•1 t ,^Mf^.fi 1 d ^)()~r- '•'' REGION V O United States v. Harshaw Chemical Cor^Jpany - Close of Action J?.;nes 0. f'cDonald, .Director Enforces:-nt Division ' • .-Stanley Leqro Assistant Administrator for Enforceinent (EN-329) us EPA RECORDS CENTER REGION 5 468491 Enclosed please find a Settlonient Anroerrient and Modified Consent Decree entered in United Star.es v. Harshav.' Chenical Ccnrpany, Case m. C-72--214 (U5DC ND Ohio) on .Mr<rch 4, 1977. A Petition vvas filed on August 30, 197G-, seeking to find Marsha\,' in contenpt, for violations of the original Conssnr, Decree betv/een th;? parties. The latter decree vias entered in 1972. Settlement v/as reached as follov/s: 1) Modification of the Consent Decree; a) Initial Effluent Liniitations extended until July 1. 1977; b) Diversion of ifarshaw's discharges from the Black River to the City of Elyria municipal treatment systein by July 1, 1977. 2) Payment of Seventeen Thousand Five-l'undred ($17,500.00) dollars by Harshaw to the United States for past Consent Decree violations. The above sun has been received and deposited in Miscellaneous Finos, Accoijnt !io. 631099. The U.S. Attorney for the liorthern District of Ohio has filed a stipulation vn'tli the Court dismissing our Petition, with prejudice, and has closed his file on this n'atter. Janes 0. McDonald U~^; 0. MoDOirAIJ) Enclosure cc: Jeffrey G. Miller Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water Enforcement Enforcement Division (EM-33J) J. Brian Molloy, Director Enforccrient Division (EN-333) John C. Goliioke Cor;:.pli:inc.-^ iir.'inch Orftco of l'.;l:ijr llwi Liz" f'roop. Attorney Advisor Lcnal branch LI 1 1 1.1 \^l.i.i>Jil L 1/ I / I ii 1',111 \i_..-J...-, "^.^••f^y.'ri^-rf:: "r'---'JBS/••;•:• vv.v
18
Embed
[REDACTED] EPA MEMO RE: US V HARSHAW CHEMICAL CO - … · 2020. 12. 10. · efendant Harshaw Chemical Company is a subsidiary of ustries Inc. and is a corporation licensed to do busi
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
•1 t ,^Mf^.fi 1 d ^)()~r- '•'' REGION V O
United States v. Harshaw Chemical Cor Jpany - Close of Action
.-Stanley Leqro Assistant Administrator for Enforceinent (EN-329)
u s EPA RECORDS CENTER REGION 5
468491
Enclosed please find a Settlonient Anroerrient and Modified Consent Decree entered in United Star.es v. Harshav.' Chenical Ccnrpany, Case m . C-72--214 (U5DC ND Ohio) on .Mr<rch 4, 1977. A Petition vvas filed on August 30, 197G-, seeking to find Marsha\,' in contenpt, for violations of the original Conssnr, Decree betv/een th;? parties. The latter decree vias entered in 1972. Settlement v/as reached as follov/s:
1) Modification of the Consent Decree;
a) Initial Effluent Liniitations extended until July 1. 1977;
b) Diversion of ifarshaw's discharges from the Black River to the City of Elyria municipal treatment systein by July 1, 1977.
2) Payment of Seventeen Thousand Five-l'undred ($17,500.00) dollars by Harshaw to the United States for past Consent Decree violations.
The above sun has been received and deposited in Miscellaneous Finos, Accoijnt !io. 631099. The U.S. Attorney for the liorthern District of Ohio has filed a stipulation vn'tli the Court dismissing our Petition, with prejudice, and has closed his file on this n'atter.
Janes 0. McDonald
U~^; 0. MoDOirAIJ)
Enclosure
cc: Jeffrey G. Miller Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water Enforcement Enforcement Division (EM-33J)
J. Brian Molloy, Director Enforccrient Division (EN-333)
John C. Goliioke Cor;:.pli:inc.- iir.'inch Orftco of l'.;l:ijr l lwi
Liz" f'roop. Attorney Advisor Lcnal branch L I 1 1 1.1 \^l.i.i>Jil L 1/ I / I ii 1',111 \i_..-J...-,
" ^ . ^ • • f ^ y . ' r i ^ - r f : : "r'---'JBS/••;•:• vv.v
UNirrn STAIT:S ENVIRONM;..rj I AL PUOTLCIIOrNl AGIZNCY
r U " G 1 0 N V
230 S O U T H U U . A n n O H N ST.
C H I C A G O . I L L I N O I S bOGO'l
o ^.5;,' 9
% i r^L' ' -^/c- ioi^
TO: Financial Management Section A t t n : Col lec t ion O f f i ce r
FROM: Enforcement Div is ion
SUBJECT: Check in sett lement o f a c i v i l penalty case under
the Federal Water Po l lu t ion Control Ac t , as amended.
Complaint: Case No. C 72-214 •.
Finn: Harshaw Chemical Co.
Amount: $17,500.00
Please deposit t h i s check in Miscellaneous Fines, Account No. 681099.
Carolyn 'S. Gates
Regional Hearing Clerk
! > l -• ^ ^
THE HARSHAW CHEMICAL COMPANY A kav.'i'r.Qc i DusTRY
P.O. BOX 591, BHYN MAVVH, PA. 1C010
TO: PHILADCI.PM;A N A T I O N A L D A N K pnlLAUCLJ'MIA. PA.
NV).
2
C i y
17
Yr.
77
' ; • ' ; •;;p-'!i::;P | ! : ; ; : " y.<'\ .IIM;.
Pay to the order of .!i;;!Jlv1C7?,I'''':;'';v!.'',.ilL ()'',: <b*' I'MI' U
N.O. 100157
Ar^o imt or C f c ; -
s *=;:=:<* 17, 500 .
CHECK INVALID !;i< l- C.NT
fnOM DATE o f iss,_E
Trcasv i re r of The United States of A m e r i c a . ,
'^^T!k)^-^ : .< * ^^w>-/ cA'-x
A»J I nC^l i i . ' i J t l 'n^«AIu<lL
it'yKirn.-rvmii-Kwinan:- miUBjj m}.-\r9V!i B wy.<'.',-.r»H!rw< imw 'T.'.iw.TL kv.; fl. - -^'tf viv^t-iggrr.^rT?'^ r?^=g^T^y•vtr!Tr^gyrT.^^•;r^ •"^.gL.'gB r ^ i r r ^ r m :
March 4, 1977 Mr, Jair.cs McDonald D i r e c t o r Enforcameat DivioIon U.S. Euvironruentai Protection Agency Region V 230 South Dcnrborn .Street Chicago, Illinois 60604
Re: United S t a t e s v . Harshav? ClieTnical Coapany Caza No. C y2'.?14 (USDG N3 Ohio)
Dear S i r s :
Enclosed please find the following:
(I) nn executed certified true copy of the csttlcnent agrccsisnt in the ubcve-captioned riatter;
(2).. an e:-:ssuted certified true copy of tho Modified Consent Decree; and
(3) Cneck No. 100137 frora Tue Harohjri* Chcsnical Coapany payoble to the Treasurar of the United Gtntes of Aiierica in the eun\ of 517,500.00, aa called for in the Bettlctaont n-fiveemsnt, y
This check ia being laailcd to you by ccrtif;ied nail for your placeniant into tha proper fund provided for this typo of action.
Ua will now filo o ctipuljition with the Court, disniisfling our action, with prtijudicG, aa called for in tho Gcttlcnicnt ngreement, V.s v;ill then close cur ttie en this r-atter.
Very truly yours,
jjQCls FREDERIC'.; M, CQ-LP.IU^ United &i:atco A t to rney
c c : Alfred T. C n i o r z i , C h i e f rollr'.L inn C.f-:~> t:ro I f •• c . , L.-:!-.-:! (: i:r\\:i\rai±7::\tLtoi\ llc-
J u n t i c c ^ ' • ' ' " ' ' ' ' ^"" "'^ ^ ^ * Jo-neph A, Cipo l lone "' 'AttSA: .To.m Clooa.:in, A 3 i ; i s t n n t U . 3 . At to rney
Al-.torr.oy 293-433G (v7/cert , truci cy;J o i I'.ncli
. L Ci 2)
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT^;'' j':'-, .V! :;: '- cnu.-;T FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO '''^''''^/^^••••'/•i-.:,^'^^^^"^
EASTERN DIVISION 't:L../<;.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
V.
HARSHAW CHEMICAL COMPANY,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. C72-214
HON. JUDGE W. K. THOMAS
MODIFIED CONSENT DECREE
In this case, the Court finds that:
The Complaint having been filed herein on March 2 ,
1972, and with plaintiff and defendant by their respective at
torneys having consented, without trial of any issue of fact or
law herein, prior to the entry of this Modified Consent Decree,
and without this Modified Consent Decree constituting any evidence
or admission by any party hereto with respect to any issue of fact
or law herein:
'NOW, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony,
upon the pleadings and upon consent of the parties hereto,,and
without adjudication of any issue of fact or law, it is Ordered,
Adjudged and Decreed as follows;
This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter herein
and of the parties consenting hereto under Section 1345 of Title 28,
f •/ '.• \ -J
United States Code. The Complaint states a claim upon which relief
may be grarted against the defendant under Title 33 United States
i Code, Sectj^on 407.
II
Kewanee In
\
products-
Definitions
efendant Harshaw Chemical Company is a subsidiary of
ustries Inc. and is a corporation licensed to do busi
ness in th^ State of Ohio and is engaged in doing business at Elyria,
Ohio, with4n this Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio.
Ill
I efendant Harshaw Chemical Company maintains a manufacturing
facility a1, Elyria, Ohio, which is engaged in producing chemical
IV
I s used in this decree:
.? k "Daily average concentration" shall mean the average
of all daily concentrations determined during the month. For those
parameters monitored as a series of discrete grab samples taken at
regular intervals throughout a day and analyzed separately, the
daily concentration shall be the average of the concentrations
of the discrete grab samples taken on any one day.
B. "Daily maximum concentration" shall mean the highest
concentration appearing in any composite sample or in any average
of discrete grab samples taken during any day of the month.
r....M,.,|,tjj.p,.j,^y^,^,^||gt,,^^,i;^^i||l.,,H..j.y.;^^^^ -.. ,_,.>,.•......... f \ ' , m •T'-'-ffCT
...;
C. "Company" shall mean The Harshaw Chemical Company.
D. "Discharge" shall mean any flow of liquids or solids
from the Company's Elyria, Ohio, facility Into the navigable waters
of the United States directly or via the sewerage system of the City
.of Elyria.
E. "Regional Administrator" shall mean the Regional
Administrator for Region V of the Environmental Protection Agency,
his successor, or his authorized representative.
. F, "Concentration" shall mean the weight of any given
material present in. a unit .volume of liquid and shall be expressed
in units of milligrams per liter (mg/1).
G. "24 hour composite" shall mean a composite sample
made up of at least six increments taken at regular intervals
throughout the 2 4 hour period.
H. "Daily average loading" shall mean the numerical
average of the daily loadings determined over the days analyses
were made during a calendar month.
I. "Daily maximum loading" shall mean the highest
loading occurring on any day of the month.
J. "Loading" shall mean the weight, expressed in
pounds or kilograms, -of a canstituent in the Company's discharge.
paragraph VII is accomplished, the Company shall monitor the
non-contact cooling water discharges to the Black River, and
the discharges from the City of Elyria sewerage system overflow
located at Obitts Chemical Company.
The Company will exercise due diligence to obtain the
repair and/or modification of its flow monitoring equipment to
make it operational, and at all times when such equipment is
operational the Company shall continuously monitor the flow and
pH of all discharges limited in Table I.
VII
Treatment facilities to comply with the provisions of
paragraph XI will be constructed and made operational in accord
ance with the following schedule:
Completion of final plans by January 2, 1977
Initiation of construction by February 1, 1977
Report of progress by March 1, 1977
Report of progress by May 1, 1977
Report of progress by June 1, 1977
Completion of construction and diversion to
Elyria sewer system by July 1, 1977
Obtain operational level by August 15, 1977
VIII
The progress reports identified in the foregoing
schedule of compliance will be submitted to the agencies listed
'..'.
below and will indicate compliance or non-compliance with the
schedule. In the event of non-compliance, the report shall in
clude the cause of noncompliance, any remedial actions taken,
and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirements.
United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V, Enforcement Division 230 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Attention: Chief, Compliance Section
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Northeast District Office 2110 East Aurora Road Twinsburq, Ohio 44087
IX
Monitoring results obtained during the previous three
months shall be summarized and reported on a Discharge Monitoring
Report Form CEPA No. 3320-1), postmarked no later than the 28th day
of the month following the completed reporting period. The first
report under this Modified Consent Decree is due for the period
ending March 31, 1977. Duplicate signed copies of these, and all
other reports required herein, shall be submitted to the Regional
Administrator and the State at the following addresses:
' United States Environmental Protection Agency Region V, Enforcement Division 230 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Attention: Chief, Compliance Section
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Northeast District Office 2110 East Aurora Road
The provisions of the Decree shall apply to and be
binding upon tte parties to. this action, their officers, agents,
servants, employees, successors and assigns, and upon all those
in active concert or participation with them who receive actual
Notice of this Decree by personal service or otherwise.
XVI
Either party may apply for cause (including but not
limited to changes in any regulatory standards and/or limitations
which would apply but for this Decree) to this Court for further
orders and directions as may be appropriate.
XVII
This Decree shall remain effective and in full force only
until 180 (one hundred eighty) days from the date on which all ac
tions required in paragraph VII ^.e achieved.
United States District Judge
wiTm)»wjff,tj.i.ii»,^g^t"^Mi.i,'.^>t*i•'.'.'j"TO».7'yg^"'^"i.ru"?P''*?'y^^Ty*J.:'^?J*''''^Vj''nr-'-fn-i-r-.>••.•-••• .:'''~-*r:.'•.—'r—'nr-»"«.'.-,r'*^-.-' ^ : T y i ' . ' i.,"-.i-"»J'."ii
. ,)
APPROVED AN^ CONSENTED TO:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
.7
THE HARSHAW CHEMICAL COMPANY,
Defendant
Frederick M. Coleman United States Attorney Northern District of Ohio
4' U'lr^^i-C^.ryL^^ oseRJn A. CipolZane s s i ^ t a n t Un i t ed / s t a t e s Attorney orthern Distriot of Ohio
Eben ^ Cockley / Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue 1700 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Attorney for Defendant
/
'i'^'^':r-.v"*r;"P-|.'-."'*^^*w<''
^ ' • '
^ " \ ) ( ) •
:. f;i.t>:s ii 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C0L/;<T'"''"•• • FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ^^^'
EASTERN DIVISION L L A I ' I ' D
CASE NO. C72-214
UTJITED ST/fTES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
v
HARSHAW CH :MICAL COMPANY,
Defendant
behalf of
by Federic
THE HON. W. K. THOMAS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER HOLDING RESPONDENT IN CONTEMPT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONSENT DECREE
Plaintiff, the United States of America, for and on
the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,
1 M. Coleman, United States Attorney for the Northern
Dis trict ojr
Attorney,
complete s
or may her
Ohio, by Joseph A. Cipollone, Assistant United States
and Defendant, The Harshaw Chemical Company do hereby
stipulate ind agree as follows:
1. That Defendant will pay to Plaintiff the sum of
Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred ($17,500) Dollars in full and
sttlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may now have
rafter claim to have, arising out of or connected with
the Consent Decree in this case filed on February 27, 1974, includ
ing those claims set forth in Plaintiff's Motion, filed on August
30, 19 76, for Entry of an Order to Show Cause and Order holding
rj-cfcndant in.Contempt for Failure to Comply with the Consent
t>*creo, and the documents attached thereto.
2. Plaintiff v/ill dismiss with prejudice its motion,
•> >'l O'A August 30, 197C, for Entry of an Order to Show Cause
• '-f' -r holding Defendant in Contempt for Failure to c o m p l y
oriiWMit; D o c r e o ,
3.\ Th parties will execute tho dified Consent 1
Decree attached hereto as Exhibit A, and will seek the Court's
approval of said Modified Consent Decree in accordance with
the rules of the Court simultaneously with this Settlement
Agreement. i
4. This Settlement Agreement is contingent upon
the Court's approval of Exhibit A and shall become effective on
the date the Court signs Exhibit A.
5. This Settlement Agreement shall not preclude
Plaintiff from taking appropriate legal action against Defendant
for any violations of 33 U.S.C. 1251 arising after the effective
date hereof or any future violations of Exhibit A.
Li
United States District Judge
APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO:
The United States of America,
Plaintiff
Frederick M. Coleman United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division
—J
'joa6'ph /Q. Cipqril'one • Uv^-^^^J n ^ . ^
Lseisiylnt United / Stiates At torney N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t ^f Ohio, E a s t e r n D iv i s ion \ J
Tho IUr.shaw Chemical Company
Defendant
•' K ' r * ' »(,• Eboi\ H. Cockloy-' 1700 Union ComiTierce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115