-
WHO TO CONTACT DURING THE LIVE PROGRAM
For Additional Registrations:
-Call Strafford Customer Service 1-800-926-7926 x1 (or
404-881-1141 x1)
For Assistance During the Live Program:
-On the web, use the chat box at the bottom left of the
screen
If you get disconnected during the program, you can simply log
in using your original instructions and PIN.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM
This program is approved for 2 CPE credit hours. To earn credit
you must:
• Participate in the program on your own computer connection (no
sharing) – if you need to register
additional people, please call customer service at
1-800-926-7926 ext. 1 (or 404-881-1141 ext. 1).
Strafford accepts American Express, Visa, MasterCard,
Discover.
• Listen on-line via your computer speakers.
• Respond to five prompts during the program plus a single
verification code.
• To earn full credit, you must remain connected for the entire
program.
Reconciling GAAP Basis and Tax Basis in Partnership
Income Tax Returns and K-1 Schedules
WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY
-
Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY
Sound Quality
When listening via your computer speakers, please note that the
quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of
your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, please e-mail
[email protected]
immediately so we can address the problem.
mailto:[email protected]
-
July 29, 2020
Reconciling GAAP Basis and Tax Basis in Partnership Income Tax
Returns and K-1 Schedules
John Colvin, Partner
Colvin & Hallett
[email protected]
Brian T. Lovett, CPA, JD, Partner
Withum Smith & Brown
[email protected]
-
Notice
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN
BY
THE SPEAKERS’ FIRMS TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT
OR ANY
OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES
THAT
MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING
OR
RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may
disclose to any and all persons,
without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both,
of any transaction
described in the associated materials we provide to you,
including, but not limited to,
any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in
those materials.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and
based on authorities that are
subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific
situations should be
determined through consultation with your tax adviser.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
5
SM
Reconciling GAAP Basis and Tax Basis
Brian T. Lovett, CPA, CGMA, JD, Withum
John Colvin, Colvin + Hallett
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
6
SM
Agenda
• GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital Account Reporting
• Tax Allocations and Economic Effect
• Detailed Reconciliation Example
• Financial Statement Implications for Partnerships
(ASC 740, FAS 5) Including New Partnership Audit
Rules
• Tax Basis Capital Reporting
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
7
SM
GAAP, TAX, & 704(B) CAPITAL ACCOUNT REPORTING
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
8
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital Accounts
GAAP vs. Tax vs. 704(b)
Partnerships often maintain multiple capital accounts,
including:
- Section 704(b) Basis Capital Accounts: Reflect the
partner’s
economic interests in the partnership.
- Tax Basis Capital Accounts: Reflects the partner’s interest
in
the
partnership based on federal income tax principles.
- GAAP Basis Capital Accounts: Determined in accordance
with various financial accounting principles. Limited
impact on Tax Basis and Section 704(b) Basis capital
accounts.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
9
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsGAAP vs. Tax vs.
704(b)
(+ / -)
GAAP Basis Capital
GAAP to Tax Differences
(+ / -)
Tax Basis Capital
Sec. 704(c) Adjustments
Sec. 704(b) Basis Capital
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
10
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsTax vs. 704(b)
Section 704(b) Capital Tax Basis Capital
Increases: • FMV of property
contributions,
including money
• Tax basis of property
contributions, including
money
• Partner share of
Section 704(b) income
• Partner share of taxable income
• Positive Section 704(b)
revaluations (book-ups)
• No change due to Section 704(b)
revaluations (book-ups)
Decreases: • FMV of property
distributions,
including money
• Tax basis of property
distributions, including
money
• Partner share of Section
704(b) losses
• Partner share of tax losses
• Negative Section 704(b)
revaluations (book-
downs)
• No change due to Section
704(b) revaluations (book-
downs)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
11
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsEffect of Liabilities on
Section 704(b) Capital
• Assumption of partner liability by partnership treated as
cash
distribution. Includes contribution of property subject to
liability
• Assumption of partnership liability by partner treated as
cash
contribution. Includes distribution of property subject to
liability
• Changes to allocable share of partnership liabilities is
not
an assumption and has no effect on capital
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
12
SM
AB
Example:
Building
Mortgage
Value
$100
($ 60)
Basis
$50
($60)
$120 of AB’s liabilities are allocable to
A after the contribution.
A
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsEffect of Liabilities on
Section 704(b) Capital
What is A’s CapitalAccount?
What is A’s Basis inAB?
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
13
SM
AB
A
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsEffect of Liabilities on
Section 704(b) Capital
Value Basis
Building $100 $50Mortgage ($ 60) ($60)
$120 of AB’s liabilities are allocable toA
after the contribution.
Capital = $100 Building Value - $60 Mortgage assumed by AB =
$40
Basis = $50 Building Basis - $60 Mortgage + $120 Liability
Allocation =
$110
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
14
SM
• No increase for contribution of a partners’ own note until
the
note is sold or as principal payments are made.
• No decrease for distribution of the partnership’s own note
until
the note is sold or as principal payments are made.
• If note is readily tradable on an established securities
market
the forgoing rules are inapplicable.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsEffect of Liabilities on
Section 704(b) Capital
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
15
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsRevaluations
• Partnership may periodically revalue Section 704(b)
capital accounts
• Regulations provide for Mandatory and Optional
revaluations
• Revaluations must reflect fair market value of partnership
property at the date of revaluation
• Allocation of book-up or book-down adjustment must
reflect the way the unrealized gain or loss would be
allocated if recognized
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
16
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital Accounts
Revaluations
• Revaluations have no impact on tax basis of assets
therefore
create additional Section 704(c) layers
• Revaluations generally have no GAAP impact, but
transactions
that trigger purchase accounting rules may have a similar
impact (i.e. partnership merger)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
17
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsRevaluations
Mandatory Revaluations
• Partnership is required to revalue distributed assets
immediately
before the partnership distributes property to any partner
• Partnership is required to revalue capital accounts
immediately after
an exercise of a noncompensatory option
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
18
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital Accounts
Revaluations
Optional Revaluations
• Partnership may choose to revalue capital accounts upon
certain
events:
- Contributions of money or property for a partnership
interest
- Liquidation or distribution as consideration for a
partnershipinterest
- Grant of a partnership interest as consideration for
servicesrendered
- Issuance by the partnership of a noncompensatory option,
or
- Generally accepted industry accounting practices (hedge
funds)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
19
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsDetermination of Section
704(b) Income
• GAAP Income is the typical starting point
• Determine Taxable Income by adjusting for “M-1” items
• Determine Section 704(b) Income (economic income) by
adjusting for differences between tax basis and Section
704(b)
basis
• Section 704(b) basis may not equal tax basis as a result
of
property contributed with values different than tax basis
and
Section 704(b) revaluations
• Differences between Section 704(b) and Tax basis are
addressed through 704(c) allocations
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
20
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsImpact of Section
704(c)
• Section 704(c): Income items with respect to property
contributed to the partnership by a partner shall be shared
among the partners so as to take account of the variation
between the basis of the property to the partnership and its
fair market value at the time of contribution.
- Built-in gain or loss on the sale of contributed property must
be allocated back to the contributing partner
- Tax depreciation/amortization on contributed property is
allocated first to the non-contributing partner in an
amount equal to the partner’s Section 704(b)
depreciation
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
21
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital Accounts
Impact of Section 704(c)
Section 704(c) rules apply to:
- Contributions of property where the Section 704(b) value (FMV)
is not equal to the tax basis (“Forward Section 704(c)
Layers”)
- Book up or down adjustments caused by Section
704(b)revaluations (“Reverse Section 704(c) Layers”)
- Possible to have multiple Forward and Reverse Section704(c)
Layers
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
22
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalSection 704(c) Depreciation
Allocation Methods
• Traditional Method
• Allocations are limited to the tax items associated with
the
contributed property.
• Ceiling rule limitations are not fixed, and the built-in gain
shifts to
noncontributing partners.
• Traditional Method with Curative Allocations
• Start with the traditional method
• Reallocate other partnership items to overcome ceiling
rule
• Other items must generally have the same effect as
depreciation.
• Remedial Method
• Provide correct amount to non-contributing partners.
• If figure that exceeds total tax items, contributing partner
picks up
offsetting income.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
23
SM
TAX ALLOCATIONS & ECONOMICEFFECT
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
24
SM
Tax Allocations & Economic EffectGeneral Rules
Section 704(a): Except as otherwise provided in the Code, a
partner’s share of partnership income items is determined by
the
partnership agreement.
Section 704(b): A partner’s share of income items is determined
in
accordance with the partner’s interest in the partnership
(“PIP”) if
the allocations per the partnership agreement do not have
Economic Effect. Regulations provide that the allocations
must
also be Substantial.
Section 704(c): Income items with respect to property
contributed to the partnership by a partner shall be shared
among
the partners so as to take account of the variation between
the
basis of the property to the partnership and its fair market
value
at the time of contribution.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
25
SM
Tax Allocations & Economic EffectSafe-Harbor Allocations
Economic Effect
• An allocation must be consistent with the underlying
economic
arrangement of the partners.
• Partners that are allocated income or loss must ultimately
bear the economic benefit or burden associated with the
allocations
• Regulatory Safe-Harbors
- General Test for Economic Effect
- Alternate Test for Economic Effect
- Economic Effect Equivalence
• Allocations that do not meet a regulatory safe-harbor are
allocated
based on the partner’s interest in the partnership (“PIP”)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
26
SM
Tax Allocations & Economic EffectSafe-Harbor Allocations
General Test for Economic Effect
1. Partnership maintains Section
704(b) Capital Accounts;
2. Liquidating distributions made in
accordance with positive Section
704(b) Capital Accounts; and
3. Partners have obligation to restore
any negative capital account
balance (a “Deficit Restoration
Obligation” or “DRO”)
Alternate Test for Economic Effect
1. Partnership maintains Section
704(b) Capital Accounts;
2. Liquidating distributions made in
accordance with positive Section
704(b) Capital Accounts; and
3. In lieu of a DRO, the partnership
agreement contains a Qualified
Income Offset (“QIO”) provision
Economic Effect Equivalence Partnership agreement does not
satisfy the General
or Alternate Test of economic effect. However, allocations are
deemed to have
economic effect if, as of the end of each partnership taxable
year, a liquidation of
the partnership at the end of such year or at the end of any
future year would
produce the same economic results to the partners as would occur
if the General
Test of economic effect had been satisfied.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
27
SM
Tax Allocations & Economic EffectSafe-Harbor Allocations
Substantiality
• The economic effect of an allocation is substantial if there
is a
reasonable possibility that the allocation will affect
substantially the
dollar amounts to be received by the partners from the
partnership,
independent of tax consequences.
- Overall Tax Effect Rule: One partner benefits at the expense
of another
- Shifting Tax Consequences: The net increases/decreases in the
partners'
respective capital accounts won’t differ substantially from the
baseline
allocations and the aggregate tax liability of the partners will
be reduced
- Transitory Allocations: There is a possibility that original
allocations will
be largely offset by offsetting allocations, providing there is
a strong
likelihood that the net increases/decreases in the partners'
capital
accounts won’t differ substantially from the baseline
allocations and the
total tax liability of the partners will be reduced in present
value terms
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
28
SM
Tax Allocations & Economic EffectTargeted or PIP
Allocations
In General
• Liquidating distributions are not based solely on the
partner’s
Section 704(b) Capital Accounts
• General and Alternate Test of Economic Effect cannot apply
• Targeted Allocations may have Economic Effect Equivalence
or
maybe in accordance with PIP
• Profits & loss allocations (including gross income) are
generally
made in the amounts necessary to ensure ending Section
704(b)
Capital Accounts reflect the partner’s liquidating
distribution
rights
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
29
SM
Tax Allocations & Economic EffectTargeted Allocations
Safe-Harbor Allocations
Capital Account
Beginning $50
Income/(Loss) $100
Ending Capital
Calculated
Targeted Allocations
Capital Account
Beginning $50
Income/(Loss) Calculated
Distribution Rights
$150
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
30
SM
Targeted Capital Account Provisions
▪ Generally, there are three steps to making targeted
allocations
• First, determine partially adjusted capital accounts
• Second, determine the targeted capital account based on
liquidation at book value
• Third, allocate profit or loss to bring partially adjusted
capital account to target amount
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
31
SM
Targeted Capital Account Provisions
▪ Basic example:
• Partner A contributes $600 to Partnership, and Partner B
contributes $400. The distribution waterfall provides that cash is
paid first to return capital contributions and then split 80% to A
and 20% to B. Partnership earned $500 in income during tax year
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
32
SM
Targeted Capital Account Provisions
▪ First, we need to determine partially adjusted capital
account:
• Initial year return, so each partner starts with $0
• Adjust for contributions and distributions made during the
year
• Partially adjusted capital accounts are:
Partner A = $600
Partner B = $400
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
33
SM
Targeted Capital Account Provisions
Description Partner A Partner B Total
Return capital $600 $400 $1,000
Residual allocation $400 $100 $500
Target amount $1,000 $500 $1,500
Less: partially adj. $600 $400 $1,000
Income allocation $400 $100 $500
Next, we need to determine the target amount. Once
determined,
subtract partially adjusted capital account from target amount
in order to
determine income/loss amounts.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
34
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital AccountsGAAP Capital In
Summary
• Client financial data generally comes as GAAP financial
statements, so you will already have total GAAP capital to
begin
• The GAAP amounts by partner are generally presented on the
schedule K-1s as the partner’s ending section 704(b) capital
ratio times total ending GAAP capital
• Difference between GAAP and 704(b) capital will result
based
on the schedule M-1/M-3 differences as well as any 704(c)
amounts. Additional differences may result from liabilities
that
exist for GAAP purposes but not for tax or 704(b) purposes
• The same event may give rise to GAAP/704(b) differences
(i.e. a purchase accounting transaction for GAAP purposes
treated as a carryover basis transaction for tax purposes,
partnership consolidated for GAAP purposes but stand alone
for tax purposes, etc.)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
35
SM
ASC 740 for Partnerships
▪ Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
▪ Generally, minimal impact on pass-through entities like
partnerships• State taxes that are deemed to be income taxes
need to be considered
▪ Changes in partnership audit rules raised some questions
▪ Guidance confirms that collection from the partnership remains
a tax on the partners and ASC 740 will not apply
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
37
SM
DETAILED RECONCILIATION EXAMPLE
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
38
SM
Exercise 1, Part 1
Individuals A, B and C form equal partnership ABC. A
contributes
depreciable equipment worth $18,000 with a basis of $9,000
subject to an $8,000 liability. B contributes land with a basis
of
$7,200 and value of $10,000. C contributes $10,000 cash. In
the
first year of operations,ABC earns GAAP net income of $10,000.
In
the first-year tax and GAAP depreciation are $3,000 and
$5,000,
respectively. The traditional method is chosen to apply
section
704(c).
• Determine the section 704(b) and tax basis capital
accounts.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalExercise
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
39
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution
Income
Depreciation
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalExercise
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution
Income
Depreciation
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
40
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000.
Income
Depreciation
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000.
Income
Depreciation
ExerciseA contributes depreciable equipment worth $18,000 with
abasis
of $9,000 subject to a $8,000 liability.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
41
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000.
Income
Depreciation
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200.
Income
Depreciation
ExerciseB contributes land with a basis of $7,200 and value of
$10,000.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
42
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income
Depreciation
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200. 10,000.
Income
Depreciation
ExerciseC contributes $10,000 cash.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
43
SM
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalExercise
GAAP to Tax Income Conversion:
GAAP Net Income 10,000
GAAP Depreciation 5,000
Taxable Income Before Depreciation 15,000
Tax Depreciation -3,000
Taxable Income 12,000
Tax to 704(b) Income Conversion:
Taxable Income Before Depreciation
704(b) Depreciation (Tax depr. on $18,000 of basis)
704(b) Net Income
15,000
-6,000
9,000
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
44
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation
ExerciseIn the first year of operations, ABC earns taxable
incomeof
$15,000 before tax depreciation on the equipment of $3,000.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
45
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)
13,000. 13,000. 13,000.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation
Exercise704(b) Depreciation is proportionate to tax
depreciation:
Equipment Tax Depr./ Tax Basis = $3,000 / $9,000 = 1/3rd
Equipment 704(b) Depr. = 1/3 x $18,000 = $6,000
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
46
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)
13,000. 13,000. 13,000.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation (0) (1,500) (1,500)
6,000. 10,700. 13,500.
ExerciseUnder the traditional method, tax depreciation is
allocated first to the non-
contributing partners to match 704(b) depreciation, but only to
the extent of tax
depreciation
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
47
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)
13,000. 13,000. 13,000.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200. 10,000.
Income 6,000. 4,500. 4,500.
Depreciation* 0. (1,500) (1,500)
7,000. 10,200. 13,000.
Under the traditional method with curative allocations, tax
depreciation is
allocated first to the non- contributing partners using the
traditional method,
and other items are reallocated to make up for any shortfall
Exercise
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
48
SM
704(b) Book A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)
13,000. 13,000. 13,000.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Tax Basis A B C
Contribution 1,000. 7,200. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation* 1,000. (2,000) (2,000)
7,000. 10,200. 13,000.
ExerciseUnder the remedial method, tax depreciation is allocated
first to the non-
contributing partners to match 704(b) depreciation whether or
not there is
enough tax depreciation
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
49
SM
GAAP Books A B C
Contribution 10,000. 10,000. 10,000.
Income 5,000. 5,000. 5,000.
Depreciation (1,667) (1,667) (1,666)
13,333. 13,333. 13,334.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalExerciseAssuming the GAAP
contributions were equal to fair market value, the same as
704(b) capital, the GAAP capital should be as follows
• In this example income and depreciation are broken out for
consistent presentation, the full net income would be
allocated in proportion to ownership in this case
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
50
SM
Exercise 1, Part 2
On the first day of year 2, the value of land has increased
to
$16,000 and the company has created goodwill value of
$30,000.
Partner D is admitted as an equal partner in exchange for a
$25,000 cash contribution.
What are the 704(b) capital accounts immediately after D’s
admission…
• If the partnership agreement calls for revaluations?
• If the partnership agreement does not call for
revaluations?
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalExercise
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
51
SM
With Revaluation A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 0.
Revaluation Gain
Contribution
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) CapitalExercise
Without Reval. A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 0.
Revaluation Gain
Contribution
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
52
SM
With Revaluation A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 0.
Revaluation Gain 12,000. 12,000. 12,000. 0.
Contribution
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Without Reval. A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 0.
Revaluation Gain0. 0. 0. 0.
Contribution
ExerciseThe value of land has increased by $6,000 to $16,000 and
the company
has created goodwill value of $30,000 ($36,000 unrealized
gain)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
53
SM
With Revaluation A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 0.
Revaluation Gain 12,000. 12,000. 12,000. 0.
Contribution 25,000.
25,000. 25,000. 25,000. 25,000.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Without Reval. A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 0.
Revaluation Gain 0. 0. 0. 0.
Contribution 25,000.
13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 25,000.
ExercisePartner D is admitted as an equal partner in exchange
for a $25,000 cash
contribution.
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
54
SM
With Revaluation A B C D
Beginning 25,000. 25,000. 25,000. 25,000.
704(b) Gain on Sale
Final Distribution
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Without Reval. A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 25,000.
704(b) Gain on Sale
Final Distribution
ExerciseThe partnership sells all its property shortly after D’s
admission for $100,000 and
distributes the proceeds in accordance with the Capital Accounts
(ignoring pre-sale
activity in year of sale)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
55
SM
With Revaluation A B C D
Beginning 25,000. 25,000. 25,000. 25,000.
704(b) Gain on Sale 0. 0. 0. 0.
Final Distribution
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Without Reval. A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 25,000.
704(b) Gain on Sale9,000. 9,000. 9,000. 9,000.
Final Distribution
Exercise
The partnership sells all its property shortly after D’s
admission for $100,000
and distributes the proceeds in accordance with the Capital
Accounts (ignore
pre-sale activity)
-
WithumSmith+Brown, PC | BE IN A POSITION OF STRENGTH
56
SM
With Revaluation A B C D
Beginning 25,000. 25,000. 25,000. 25,000.
704(b) Gain on Sale 0. 0. 0. 0.
Final Distribution 25,000. 25,000. 25,000. 25,000.
GAAP, Tax, & 704(b) Capital
Without Reval. A B C D
Beginning 13,000. 13,000. 13,000. 25,000.
704(b) Gain on Sale9,000. 9,000. 9,000. 9,000.
Final Distribution 22,000. 22,000. 22,000. 34,000.
Exercise
The partnership sells all its property shortly after D’s
admission for $100,000
and distributes the proceeds in accordance with the Capital
Accounts (ignore
pre-sale activity)
-
J O H N M . C O L V I N
C O L V I N + H A L L E T T , P . S .
Revised Partnership Audit RulesUnder the BBA
57
-
Overview
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, P.L. 114-74, § 1101 (enacting
new §§ 6221-6241).
Repealed and replaced the TEFRA partnership rules and the
(seldom used) electing large partnership (ELP) rules for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2017.
The goal of the changes was to shift the burden of making
adjustmentsfrom the IRS to partnerships and their partners.
58
-
Why the Change?
After making substantive adjustments at the partnership level,
the IRS spent months or years locating partners and collected
little or no tax.
The trouble with tiered partnerships - GAO and TIGTA
reports.
Given these frustrations, It was clear that Congress was going
to revise the rules in order to assess and collect tax at the
entity level.
In October 2015, the Real Estate Roundtable Tax Policy Advisory
Committee suggested modifications, many of which were ultimately
incorporated, including the alternative K-1 “push‐out”
procedures.
BBA applies to all partnerships and entities filing partnership
returns (even if it’s later determined that the entity is not a
partnership) (§6241(1) and (8)).
59
-
TEFRA vs. BBA
60
-
Opting Out of the BBA Audit Rules
Make election on timely filed return. § 6221(b)(1)(D)(i).
Only available if partnership has 100 or fewer partners, all of
whom are eligible partners
Eligible partners: individuals, C corporations (including
foreign entities that would be taxed as C corporations), S
corporations (but counting each S corporation shareholder as a
partner for purposes of the 100-partner limit), or estates of
deceased partners. § 6221(b)(1)(B) & (C). 100-partner limit
based on the number of Forms K-1 required to be filed (not actually
filed).
See § 6221(b)(1)(B).
Ineligible partners: other partnerships (upper tier), trusts,
disregarded entities (SMLLCs, grantor trusts), estates of
individuals other than deceased partners, nominee partners
61
-
Why Opt Out?
Partners would rather trust their own tax advisors to handle
audit issues
More cumbersome for the IRS to audit, as IRS will have to deal
with multiple parties
If partnership has potential reallocation issues (§704(b)
issues)
Preserve personal penalty defenses
This could be especially important in partnerships designed for
tax-advantaged transactions
62
-
Additional Issues Regarding Opting Out
Partnership cannot opt out if partners include disregarded
entities (DREs), other partnerships, or trusts (even grantor
trusts). See § 6221(b)(1)(C).
If partnership has pass-through entities as partners, may want
to have the pass-through entities change status (e.g., have
domestic LLC formerly taxed as partnership make an S election) to
preserve the ability to opt out.
REITs and RICs are eligible partners for purpose of opting out
because these entities are technically C corporations (i.e., all
corporations are C corporations if they are not an S corporation
pursuant to § 1361(a)(2)).
63
-
Effective Date
BBA partnership audit rules generally apply to tax years
beginning on January 1, 2018.
Partnerships were allowed to elect into application of the BBA
provisions for partnership tax years beginning after November 2,
2015 (date BBA was enacted).
64
-
Partnership Representative - § 6223
Partnership will designate (in manner prescribed by the
Secretary) a partner (or other person) with a “substantial presence
in the United States” to be the Partnership Representative. §
6223(a).
Partnership Representative has sole authority to act on behalf
of partnership for purposes of the BBA partnership audit rules.
Id.
If no partnership designation, the IRS “may select any person as
the partnership representative” Id. (emphasis added).
Partnership and all of its partners are bound by actions taken
by the partnership pursuant to Subchapter 68C (the BBA Partnership
Audit rules). § 6223(b)(1).
65
-
Basic Procedure
IRS sends out Notice of Selection for Examination (Letter
2205-D) (new concept in Regs). IRS sends out Notice of Initiation
of Administrative Proceeding. § 6231(a)(1). After audit complete,
IRS sends out Notice of Proposed Partnership Adjustment.
§ 6231(a)(2). Partnership provides info supporting modification
to IRS within 270-day period after
issuance of Notice of Proposed Adjustment. During this 270-day
period, the IRS is barred from issuing a Notice of Final
Partnership Adjustment. § 6225(c)(1) and (7); § 6231(b)(2)(A).
IRS sends out Notice of Final Partnership Adjustment. §
6231(a)(3). Like Notices of Deficiency, sent to the “Last Known
Address” of Partnership Representative or Partnership.
§ 6231(a) (hanging paragraph).
Unclear, but above steps may also be required if the partnership
files an AAR. § 6231(a) (hanging paragraph) (“The first sentence
shall apply to any proceeding with respect to an administrative
adjustment request filed by a partnership under section
6227.”).
66
-
BBA Basic Audit Procedure
270 days
Audit60 Day Letter
Appeals NOPPA
“Pull In”/ Partners File Amended
Returns
Options
(1)
Imputed Underpayment Modifications: Reductions to Rate (if
p-ship
will pay)
(2)
270 Days After
NOPPA
FPA
“Push Out”/ K-1
Alternative
Partnership Assessment
Petition
90 Days
45
Days
Agree
67
-
Definitions: Reviewed Year and Adjustment Year
“Reviewed Year”– the partnership taxable year to which the
item(s) being adjusted relates. § 6225(d)(1).
“Adjustment Year” – § 6225(d)(2) – the partnership tax year in
which either:
A court proceeding under § 6234 becomes final;
An AAR under § 6227 is made; or
If not covered above, the Notice of Final Partnership Adjustment
is mailed.
If partnership ceases to exists before an adjustment is made,
the former partners of the partnership are required to take the
adjustment into account. § 6241(7).
69
-
“Imputed Underpayment”
“Imputed Underpayment”– net adjustments multiplied by highest
rate of tax under section 1 or 11. § 6225(b).
Modifications that may reduce “imputed underpayment”: Take into
account any amounts reported on amended returns filed by Reviewed
Year
partners (along with payment). § 6225(c)(2).
Disregard portion allocable to tax-exempt partners. §
6225(c)(3).
Make adjustments with respect to amounts allocable to individual
partners if such amounts would have been subject to capital
gain/qualified dividend rate. § 6225(c)(4)(A)(ii).
Make adjustments with respect to amounts allocable to partners
subject to section 11 rate (if lower than section 1 rate) (i.e., C
corporations). § 6225(c)(4)(A)(i).
Other factors. § 6225(c)(5) and (6).
70
-
“Imputed Underpayment” - Character of Adjustments
Regulations attempt to preserve character as much possible in
computing “imputed underpayment” through use of grouping procedure.
Treas. Reg. § 301.6225-1.
(Net Positive Adjustments x Tax Rate) – Adjusted Credits
Adjustments first grouped: (1) reallocation grouping, (2) credit
grouping; and(3) residual grouping
Adjustments within each grouping/subgrouping are netted
(excluding the credit grouping). Netted amounts resulting in a
non-positive adjustment are disregarded for this purpose
Net adjustment is multiplied by highest rate under section 1 or
11
Product is reduced, but not below zero by net adjustment to
credits
71
-
Example – Simple Adjustments
Audit Adjustment Ordinary Subgroup Capital Subgroup Credit
Group
Increase OI $200
Decrease depreciation $40
Increase LTCG $80
Decrease LTCL $40
Increase Tax Credits $8
Total Audit Adj by Group $240 $120 ($8)
Assumed Highest Rate 40% 40%
Imputed Underpayment $96 $48 ($8)
Imputed Underpayment $136
72
-
Example – Moving LTCG to OI
Audit Adjustment Ordinary Subgroup Capital Subgroup
Increase OI $200
Decrease LTCG ($200)
Total Audit Adjustments $200 ($200)
Assumed Highest Tax Rate 40% 0%
Imputed Underpayment $80
73
-
Example – Reallocation Between Partners
Audit Adjustment Partner A Subgroup Partner B Subgroup
Reallocate OI $30 ($30)
Reallocate Deprecation ($70) $70
Total Adjustments ($40) $40
Assumed Highest Rate 0% 40%
Imputed Underpayment $16
74
-
Imputed Underpayment: Reduce by Amending Returns
The net liability of the partnership and its partners in
virtually all cases will be minimized if the partners file amended
returns within the 270-day period.
Benefit of lower marginal rates, use of partners’ other tax
attributes to mitigate the adjustment.
Any penalty at partnership level should be based on aggregate
net adjustments. The aggregate net adjustments will ordinarily be
lower if partners file amended returns.
Alternative: “pull-in” procedure which allows partnership to
submit the relevant information on behalf of the relevant partner
(reflecting what would have been owed) as well as make payment.
75
-
Some But Not All Partners File Amended Returns, AndThe
Partnership Pays Some Imputed Adjustment
Considerations:
Partners who do not file amended returns should be treated
differently from those who do not file amended returns with respect
to the imputed underpayment paid by the partnership.
Partners who file amended returns and pay tax should not have to
share in the tax burden remaining at the partnership level.
Logical solution would be to treat portion of imputed
adjustments as distribution to the non-paying partners.
76
-
Imputed Underpayment: Adjustments Relating to Inter‐Partner
Allocations
If an adjustment reallocates distributive shares of any item
from one partner to another, these are not netted. § 6225(b)(2).
Instead, the imputed underpayment is determined by disregarding any
decrease in
any item of income or gain and any increase in any item of
deduction loss or credit. § 6225(b)(2).
The partnership can avoid the imputed adjustment only if all
partners who are subject to the reallocation file amended returns.
§ 6225(c)(2)(B) & (C).
77
-
Imputed Underpayment: Assessment and Collection
“Imputed Underpayment” assessed and collected in same manner as
if it were a tax imposed for the Adjustment Year. § 6232(a).
If AAR showing tax due is filed, payment of underpayment is due
when the AAR is filed.
In tiered partnership setting, failure to comply with
consistency requirement is treated like math error. §
6232(d)(2).
Partners not subject to joint and several liability for any
liability determined at the partnership level. House 2015
Bipartisan Budget Act Section-by-Section Summary. Possibility that
IRS will assert transferee liability if there have been
distributions that
leave partnership insolvent and unable to pay tax.
78
-
Imputed Underpayment:Treat Payment as Distribution to
Partner
To the extent that the partnership obligation to pay an imputed
underpayment is related to the income/loss of (or distributions to)
any partner, the amounts required to be paid by the partnership
with respect to such partner (including taxes, penalties and
interest) seems to be appropriately treated as a distribution to
that partner.
Prop. Reg. § 301.6225-4(c) treats payments of imputed
underpayment (and any interest and penalties) as non-deductible,
non-capitalizable expenses under §705(a)(2)(B).
To the extent that the items are attributable to persons who
were partners in the Reviewed Year, but who are not partners in the
Adjustment Year, there is a disconnect.
To the extent that there is no mechanism for recovering from
departed partners, this burden will have to be spread across
Adjustment Year partners.
79
-
Partnership Generally Pays Interest and Penalties
The assessment amount is computed for the Adjustment Year by
calculating interest accrued from the Reviewed Year to the
Adjustment Year, taking into account the effect of changes in the
intervening years. § 6233(a)(2).
Regular interest runs from Adjustment Year forward. §
6233(b)(2).
Partnership is liable for penalties (including accuracy and
fraud penalties) as if it had been an individual subject to tax on
amount of imputed adjustment in Reviewed Year. § 6233(a)(3).
In case of a failure to pay an imputed underpayment for
Adjustment Year, the partnership is subject to the delinquency
penalties, including failure to pay under § 6651(a)(2). §
6233(b)(3).
80
-
Alternative to Imputed Underpayment: “Push-Out” Adjustments to
Partners in Year of Adjustment – § 6226
Must elect no later than 45 days after issuance of Notice of
Final Partnership Adjustment. § 6226(a)(1).
In the Adjustment Year, the partnership issues Form K-1-type
statements to those who were partners during the Reviewed Year. §
6226(a)(2).
Partners are required to include a tax amount on their personal
tax returns for the Adjustment Year equal to the amount (plus
interest) that would have been paid if taken into account in
Reviewed Year, plus any adjustments for intervening tax years
(years between Reviewed Year and Adjustment Year) where the
adjustments made would result in an increase in tax in those years.
§ 6226(b)(1) and (2). Deficiency procedures do not apply to
Reviewed Year partners who do not include K-1 amount on
personal
tax return.
Any tax attributes affected had adjustments been taken into
account during the Reviewed Year, or any year between Reviewed Year
and Adjustment Year, must also be “appropriately adjusted.” §
6226(b)(3). In many cases, additional income in the earlier years
would provide basis in later years (shielding
distributions). It is unclear if this can be taken into account.
File protective AARs for intervening years?
81
-
Push-Out/Form K-1 Alternative: Interest and Penalties
Interest is computed at “hot interest” rates (federal short term
rate plus 5%) from “due date of return to which the increase is
attributable” (Reviewed Year and any later year where tax is
“appropriately adjusted”). § 6226(c)(2).
Applicability of penalties determined at partnership level, but
those persons who were “partners of the partnership for the
reviewed year shall be liable for any such penalty.” § 6226(c)(1).
Thus, there is no personal defense to the penalty for the partners
who receive Forms K-1.
Even if a partner filed an amended return prior to the issuance
of the Final Notice of Partnership Adjustment, eliminating the
portion of the partnership imputed understatement attributable to
him, if penalties are applicable, the Form K-1 could require the
partner to pay his share of the penalty, plus “hot interest”
thereon.
82
-
§ 6225(a)(2) – Situations Where There Is No Imputed
Underpayment
To the extent that audit adjustments do not result in an imputed
underpayment (e.g., the audit adjustment generates refunds), the
adjustment is generally taken into account by the partnership in
the Adjustment Year as a reduction in non-separately stated income.
§ 6225(a)(2).
While the imputed underpayment includes an interest component,
there is no statutory mechanism to provide refund interest if the
adjustments result in refunds.
The Adjustment Year partners (current partners) get the benefit
of net taxpayer favorable adjustments (assuming no AAR filed),
while the Reviewed Year partners will bear the burden of net
underpayment adjustments if the § 6226 push-out method is
elected.
83
-
Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR)
Statute authorizes filing of AAR to adjust one or more items of
income, gain, loss, deduction or credit. § 6227(a).
May be filed by partnership (under “rules similar to” § 6225
default rule) or by partnership and partners (under “rules similar
to” § 6226 Form K-1 method). § 6227(b)(1) and (2).
If there is no imputed adjustment (e.g., AAR reflects a
reduction of income or increase in loss/deduction/credits), must
use the § 6226 Form K-1 method. § 6227(b) (hanging paragraph) (“In
case of adjustment that would not result in an imputed
underpayment, paragraph (1) shall not apply and paragraph (2) shall
apply with appropriate adjustments.”) Thus, any refund generated by
an AAR will go to the partners.
Must be filed within 3 years of later of: (1) date original
return was filed, or (2) due date of return without regard to
extensions. § 6227(c).
There is no stand alone “refund jurisdiction” for the courts
with respect to an AAR. If a Final Partnership Adjustment is made
as a result of an AAR, it appears that the matter may be contested
in court. See § 6231(a) (last sentence of hanging paragraph).
84
-
Observations Regarding AARs
The time limit on an AAR (3 years) makes filing one in the case
of potential timing adjustments (i.e., deficiency in one year and
refund in later year) absolutely essential.
The AAR provisions make timing adjustments potentially
problematic for a partnership. Cash flow mismatch: While the
partnership could pay an imputed adjustment in the
Adjustment Year of the year under of the audit, the persons who
were partners during the AAR year would get the benefit of any
refund.
Complexity increases if a new partner arrives in the middle of a
timing adjustment, which increases income in an earlier year and
decreases income in a later year. There will be a windfall to the
incoming partner who will receive the benefit of a refund, while
the outgoing partner could end up paying a deficiency on an amended
return or under § 6226 procedures.
85
-
Other Implications
Financial Statements. Possibility that partnership will incur an
entity-level tax means that partnerships may have to reflect a
provision for taxes on their financial statements under FASB No.
109 (ASC Topic 740). FIN 48 (“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes”) may also be applicable.
86
-
Reporting Tax Basis Capital Accounts87
-
Background – Part 1
Partnerships have long been required to report capital accounts
on the Schedule K-1 to Form 1065 (and 8865).
Many partnerships maintain their capital accounts on a § 704(b)
book basis or GAAP basis, rather than on a tax basis.
Reporting on book or GAAP basis allows the partnership to better
track the economic agreement between the partners by measuring the
value of assets contributed to a partnership at the time of
contribution (rather than by their historical, pre-contribution tax
basis), but also requires taxpayers to make adjustments at tax
time, e.g., § 704(c).
Capital accounts maintained on a § 704(b) book basis or on a
GAAP basis may differ substantially from capital accounts
maintained on a tax basis.
88
-
Background – Part 2
It is permissible for a partner to have a negative capital
account balance, usually in tandem with an allocation of
partnership debt, or a deficit restoration obligation.
Negative capital accounts can result if the partner has taken a
distribution or losses financed by partnership debt. Whether a
distribution is taxable depends on whether it exceeds a partner’s
tax basis in his partnership interest (plus his share of
partnership liabilities). Similarly, partners cannot take losses in
excess of their tax basis (including their share of partnership
liabilities.)
Negative tax basis capital accounts can also result when a
partner contributes property to a partnership that is subject to
debt in excess of its basis.
Because partnerships did not previously have to report capital
accounts on a tax basis, the IRS could not readily determine if
distributions or losses exceeded basis.
89
-
2018 Returns: IRS Requires Partnerships toReport Negative Tax
Basis Capital Accounts
The instructions to Schedule K-1 to Form 1065 now require larger
partnerships (with assets of more than $1 million or gross receipts
of more than $250,000) and late filing partnerships, who do not
otherwise report capital accounts on a tax basis, to now report on
line 20 of Schedule K-1 (using code AH) the amount of every
partners’ “tax basis capital” at the beginning and end of the year
if either amount is negative.
The “tax basis capital” is essentially the partner’s tax basis
in his partnership interest (not including the partner’s share of
partnership liabilities, which is reported elsewhere on the Form
K-1). This information will make it much easier for the IRS to
determine if a partner may have received a distribution or claimed
losses in excess of basis.
90
-
Penalty Relief Provided for 2018 Tax Returns Wherethe Negative
Tax Basis Capital Accounts Were Not Reported
In light of the enormity of the task, return preparers were
worried that errors in the computation of tax basis capital
accounts could result in the assertion of penalties under §§ 6698
or 6722 for failure to file a correct partnership returns and/or
Forms K-1.
In March of 2019, in Notice 2019-20, 2019-13 IRB 1, the IRS
announced that penalties would not be imposed so long as the
required information was supplied in a separate schedule within one
year of the un-extended due date for the partnership tax return
(the contents of the schedule are set out in the FAQs discussed
below).
In April of 2019, the IRS put out an FAQ on its website
regarding “negative tax basis capital.”
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/partnerships/form-1065-frequently-asked-questions.
91
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/partnerships/form-1065-frequently-asked-questions
-
IRS FAQs - Initial Tax Basis Capital Account and Increases
Money contributed to partnership, PLUS
i. The adjusted tax basis of non-cash property contributed by
the partner to the partnership, less the liabilities assumed by the
partnership (or to which the property is subject) in connection
with the contribution;
ii. The sum of the partner’s distributive share for the taxable
year and prior taxable years of partnership income or gain
(including tax-exempt income);
iii. The partner’s distributive share of the excess of the tax
deductions for depletion (other than oil and gas depletion) over
the tax basis of the property subject to depletion;
iv. The amount of liabilities of the partnership assumed by the
partner, excluding liabilities assumed in connection with a
distribution of property; and
v. The partner’s distributive share of any increase to the tax
basis of partnership property under § 734(b) or with respect to
partnership property under § 743(b).
92
-
IRS FAQs – Decreases to Tax Basis Capital Account
i. Distributions of money to the partner;
ii. The adjusted tax basis of property distributed to the
partner from the partnership, less the liabilities assumed (or to
which the property is subject) in connection with the
distribution;
iii. The sum of the partner’s distributive share for the taxable
year and prior taxable years of partnership losses and deductions
(including expenditures which are not deductible in computing
partnership taxable income and which are not capital
expenditures);
iv. The partner’s distributive share of the tax deductions for
depletion of any partnership oil and gas property, not to exceed
the partner’s share of the adjusted tax basis of that property;
v. The partner’s distributive share of the adjusted tax basis of
charitable property contributions and foreign taxes paid or
accrued;
vi. The amount of a partner’s individual liabilities that are
assumed by the partnership, excluding liabilities assumed in
connection with a contribution of property to the partnership;
and
vii. The partner’s distributive share of any decrease to the tax
basis of partnership property under § 734(b) or with respect to
partnership property under § 743(b).
93
-
FAQs – Example of Negative Tax Basis Capital Account
Example 1: On January 1, 2019, A and B each contribute $100 in
cash to a newly formed partnership. On the same day, the
partnership borrows $800 and purchases Asset X, qualified property
for purposes of § 168(k), for $1,000. Assume that the partnership
properly allocates the $800 liability equally to A and B under §
752. Immediately after the partnership acquires Asset X, both A and
B have tax basis capital accounts of $100 and outside bases of $500
($100 cash contributed, plus $400 share of partnership liabilities
under § 752). In 2019, the partnership recognizes $1,000 of tax
depreciation under § 168(k) with respect to Asset X; the
partnership allocates $500 of the tax depreciation to A and $500 of
the tax depreciation to B. On December 31, 2019, A and B both have
tax basis capital accounts of negative $400 ($100 cash contributed,
less $500 share of tax depreciation) and outside bases of zero
($100 cash contributed, plus $400 share of partnership liabilities
under § 752, and less $500 of share tax depreciation).
94
-
FAQs – Tax Capital Account Where Partner AcquiresInterest in
Partnership from Another Partner
A partner that acquired its partnership interest by transfer
from another partner, for example, by purchase or in a
non-recognition transaction, has a tax capital account immediately
after the transfer equal to the transferring partner’s tax capital
account immediately before the transfer with respect to the portion
of the interest transferred, except no portion of any § 743(b)
basis adjustment the transferring partner may have is transferred
to the partner acquiring the interest as part of the
transaction.
If the partnership has a § 754 election in effect, the
partnership increases or decreases the tax capital account acquired
by the transferee partner by an amount equal to the positive or
negative adjustment to the tax basis of partnership property under
§ 743(b) as a result of the transfer.
95
-
FAQs – Safe Harbor For Determining Whether Or Not A Partner Has
A Negative Tax Basis Capital Account
Partnerships may calculate a partner’s tax basis capital account
by subtracting the partner’s share of partnership liabilities under
§ 752 from the partner’s outside basis (safe harbor approach).
If a partnership elects to use the safe harbor approach, the
partnership must report the negative tax basis capital account
information as equal to the excess, if any, of the partner’s share
of partnership liabilities under § 752 over the partner’s outside
basis.
96
-
FAQs – Certain Partnerships Not Required to ReportNegative Tax
Basis Capital Account Information
A partnership that satisfies all four of the conditions provided
in question 4 on Schedule B to the Form 1065 does not have to
comply with the requirement to report negative tax basis capital
account information. The conditions are:
a. The partnership’s total receipts for the tax year were less
than $250,000;
b. The partnership’s total assets at the end of the tax year
were less than $1 million;
c. Schedules K-1 are filed with the return and furnished to the
partners on or before the due date (including extensions) for the
partnership return; and
d. The partnership is not filing and is not required to file
Schedule M-3.
97
-
2020 Partnership Tax Returns Changes
Some draft 2019 partnership forms and instructions (Forms 1065
and 8865) required most partnerships to report all partner capital
accounts on a tax basis. Predictably, there was an outcry.
In Notice 2019-66, 2019-52 IRB 1509, the IRS delayed this
requirement until 2020.
The Notice indicates that further guidance on the definition of
partner tax basis capital accounts will be published, and comments
requested.
98
-
Notice 2020-43, 2020-27 I.R.B. 1
IRS provides two alternative methods for determining tax basis
capital accounts Modified Outside Basis Method
Modified Previously Taxed Capital Method
Methodology set out in FAQs discussed above (transactional
approach) would not be permitted (IRS believes providing guidance
would be too burdensome)
For years after 2020
Unless something changes, these will be the only two methods
available to compute tax basis capital accounts
Comments requested
99
-
Notice 2020-43Modified Outside Basis Method
Either the partnership or a partner will determine the partner’s
outside basis in the partnership interest
Subtract from the partner’s outside basis the partner’s share of
liabilities under §752; the difference is the tax basis capital
account number
Partners may provide their own outside basis to the partnership,
in writing within 30 days of year-end
Partnership can rely on partner provided information unless it
is clearly erroneous
100
-
Notice 2020-43Modified Previously Taxed Capital Method
Must calculate a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership
using FMV, GAAP or §704(b)
Previously taxed capital is equal to: The amount of cash the
partner would receive on liquidation, plus
The amount of tax loss allocated to the partner from the
hypothetical sale, less
The amount of tax gain that would be allocated to the partner
from the hypothetical sale
Must include a statement that a partnership is using this method
and the method used to determine net liquidity value of
partnership
101
-
Notice 2020-43Modified Previously Taxed Capital Method -
Example
Account Book Tax
Cash $500 $500
Inventory $1,000 $1,000
Equipment $500 $500
Land $1,000 $1,000
Total Assets $3,000 $3,000
Debt $5,000 $5,000
Partner A (50%) ($1,000) ($1,000)
Partner B (50%) ($1,000) ($1,000)
102
-
Notice 2020-43Modified Previously Taxed Capital Method – Example
(cont.)
Under the Modified Previously Taxed Capital Method, tax capital
would be equal to: The amount of cash a partner would receive - $0
in this case since the debt exceeds
the book basis of the assets
Plus the loss allocated to each partner - $0
Less the gain that would be allocated to each partner – $1,000
($5,000 amount realized de to the debt, less $3,000 book basis in
the assets, split between the 2 partners)
$0 + $0 - $1,000 = ($1,000) tax capital for each partner
103
-
Other Reporting Change – Unrecognized § 704(c) Gain/Loss
For 2019 partnership tax returns, the IRS imposed a requirement
that taxpayers report the partners’ shares of unrecognized § 704(c)
gain or loss. Form 1065 , Schedule K-1, Item N.
The instructions did not provide a definition of “unrecognized §
704(c) gain or loss.”
Commenters requested additional guidance, especially with
respect to multiple layers of forward and reverse § 704(c) gain
& loss, tiered partnerships, and partnership mergers and
divisions.
Notice 2009-70, 2009 IRB 255, requested comment on these issues
prior to the imposition of the reporting requirement.
Notice 2019-66, 2019-52 IRB 1509, provided a stopgap definition
of “unrecognized §704(c) gain or loss” for 2019 reporting, defining
it as “the partner's share of the net (“net” means aggregate or
sum) of all unrecognized gains or losses under § 704(c) in
partnership property, including § 704(c) gains and losses arising
from revaluations of partnership property.”
Additional guidance is likely forthcoming.
Notice 2019-66 also clarified that this requirement will not
apply to publicly-traded partnerships until further notice.
104