Recognition of Impending Systemic Failure Saul Flores, MD,* Paul A. Checchia, MD, FCCM, FACC* *Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX Education Gap Early recognition of impending systemic failure is critical for timely interventions. However, some evidence demonstrates lower identification rates of impending systemic failure by primary care and emergency department physicians. Objectives After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Discuss how impending systemic failure (SF) presentation varies by age. 2. Delineate the epidemiological risk factors for the development of impending SF. 3. List the signs and symptoms of impending SF. 4. Recognize the laboratory findings associated with impending SF. 5. Define the various types of SF. 6. Describe the physiological parameters used to monitor critically ill patients at risk for impending SF. 7. Plan the management of impending SF. 8. Describe measures to prevent the development of SF. 9. Describe the implementation of rapid response teams. 10. Identify irreversible systemic failure (eg, brain death, hepatic failure, cardiogenic shock). CASE STUDY You are the senior resident on call and part of the rapid response team (RRT) this evening. You are about to evaluate a 10-month-old infant in the pediatric inpatient ward after the parents activated the RRT. The patient’s bedside nurse informs you that for the past hour, the patient is more tachycardic and tachypneic and is febrile to 101.3°F (38.5°C) with increase of the pediatric early warning score (PEWS). In addition, the patient’s mother discloses that she has not had to change any dia- pers in the past 3 hours, and she also noticed the patient’s abdomen becoming more enlarged. The infant’s physical examination findings are a gallop, intermit- tent wheezing, and hepatosplenomegaly. The infant’s laboratory findings are AUTHOR DISCLOSURE Dr Flores has disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article. Dr Checchia has disclosed that he has a patent application for a nitric oxide delivery service and a research grant for a multicenter respiratory syncytial virus research project and that he is a consultant for AbbVie. ABBREVIATIONS AKI acute kidney injury ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ICU intensive care unit IV intravenous MH malignant hyperthermia NIRS near-infrared spectroscopy PALS pediatric advanced life support PEWS pediatric early warning score RRT rapid response team SF systemic failure 520 Pediatrics in Review by guest on November 27, 2017 http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/ Downloaded from
12
Embed
Recognition of Impending Systemic Failure · 1. Discuss how impending systemic failure (SF) presentation varies by age. 2. Delineate the epidemiological risk factors for the development
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Recognition of Impending Systemic FailureSaul Flores, MD,* Paul A. Checchia, MD, FCCM, FACC*
*Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Education Gap
Early recognition of impending systemic failure is critical for timely
interventions. However, some evidence demonstrates lower identification
rates of impending systemic failure by primary care and emergency
department physicians.
Objectives After completing this article, readers should be able to:
1. Discuss how impending systemic failure (SF) presentation varies by
age.
2. Delineate the epidemiological risk factors for the development of
impending SF.
3. List the signs and symptoms of impending SF.
4. Recognize the laboratory findings associated with impending SF.
5. Define the various types of SF.
6. Describe the physiological parameters used to monitor critically ill
patients at risk for impending SF.
7. Plan the management of impending SF.
8. Describe measures to prevent the development of SF.
9. Describe the implementation of rapid response teams.
You are the senior resident on call and part of the rapid response team (RRT) this
evening. You are about to evaluate a 10-month-old infant in the pediatric inpatient
ward after the parents activated the RRT. The patient’s bedside nurse informs you
that for the past hour, the patient is more tachycardic and tachypneic and is febrile
to 101.3°F (38.5°C) with increase of the pediatric early warning score (PEWS). In
addition, the patient’s mother discloses that she has not had to change any dia-
pers in the past 3 hours, and she also noticed the patient’s abdomen becoming
more enlarged. The infant’s physical examination findings are a gallop, intermit-
tent wheezing, and hepatosplenomegaly. The infant’s laboratory findings are
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE Dr Flores hasdisclosed no financial relationships relevant tothis article. Dr Checchia has disclosed that hehas a patent application for a nitric oxidedelivery service and a research grant for amulticenter respiratory syncytial virusresearch project and that he is a consultantfor AbbVie.
ABBREVIATIONS
AKI acute kidney injury
ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome
ECMO extracorporeal membrane
oxygenation
ICU intensive care unit
IV intravenous
MH malignant hyperthermia
NIRS near-infrared spectroscopy
PALS pediatric advanced life support
PEWS pediatric early warning score
RRT rapid response team
SF systemic failure
520 Pediatrics in Review by guest on November 27, 2017http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/Downloaded from
Gastrointestinal Ileus, feeding intolerance GI bleeding, distended abdomenwith signs of peritonitis
Hepatic Right upper quadranttenderness, hepatomegaly
Jaundice AST > 200 U/LALT > 200 U/LINR > 1.5 in the absence of
anticoagulation therapy
Hematologic Endothelial and plateletactivation
Disseminated intravascularcoagulation
Platelet counts <50 � 103
or 400 � 103
PT of 20 saPTT of 40 sFibrinogen level <100 mg/dL
or >400 mg/dL
Metabolic Mild acidosis Severe acidosis, hyperlactatemia Lactate level >2 mmol/L
ALT¼alanine aminotransferase; aPTT¼activated partial thromboplastin; AST¼aspartate aminotransferase; BNP¼brain-type natriuretic peptide; FIO2¼fraction ofinspired oxygen; GCS¼Glascow Coma Scale; INR¼international normalized ratio; NH4¼ammonium; O2ER¼oxygen extraction ratio; PaCO2¼partial pressure ofcarbon dioxide, arterial; PaO2¼partial pressure of oxygen, arterial; PT¼prothrombin time; sCr¼serum creatinine; SvO2¼mixed venous oxygen saturation.To convert picograms per milliliter to nanograms per liter for BNP level, multiply by 1. To convert milligrams per deciliter to micromoles per liter for sCr level,multiply by 88.4. To convert international units per liter tomicrokatals per liter for aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, multiplyby 0.0167. To convert milligrams per deciliter to grams per liter for fibrinogen level, multiply by 0.01.
Vol. 38 No. 11 NOVEMBER 2017 523 by guest on November 27, 2017http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/Downloaded from
significant negative consequences of pulmonary fluid over-
load and exacerbation of myocardial dysfunction. After
initial resuscitation, diuretic use in patients with SF and
AKI is controversial. Loop diuretics theoretically reduce tubu-
lar oxygen consumption and prevent intratubular obstruction,
which can prevent AKI or slow AKI progression. At the same
time, forcedfluid removal by using diuretics can be associated
with an increased risk of AKI and acute tubular necrosis. (9)
The main form of renal support therapy, electrolyte
control, and acid-base disturbance correction in SF is dial-
ysis. Existing data favor initiation of dialysis before clinically
significant (>15%) fluid overload. As with any invasive
procedure, renal support therapy can have complications;
however, most of the time, the benefits appear to outweigh
the risks.
Nutritional SupportAvoidance of fasting and provision of early nutritional
support in children with SF are important. Occasionally,
providers face challenges with determining the proper
route, the amount and caloric density of nutrition, and
the timing of initiation. Regardless of the etiologic origins
of SF, enteral nutrition is the preferred route, even in patients
with postoperative trauma. The use of parenteral nutrition
should be reserved for patients who are unable to tolerate
enteral nutrition or for complementing enteral nutrition.
Moreover, nutritional support should be started early, as
soon as there is hemodynamic stability—preferably within
48 hours of admission or the completion of a surgical
procedure. Lastly, it is recommended that full caloric feeding
be avoided in the first week and limited to low-dose feedings,
advancing only as tolerated.
Refractory SFCorticosteroids. The use of hydrocortisone in the manage-
ment of SF is reserved for children at risk for absolute
adrenal insufficiency or adrenal pituitary axis failure and for
some patients with refractory shock, despite vasoactive
medication infusion. Ideally, administration of hydrocorti-
sone should be preceded by a blood sample for subsequent
determination of baseline cortisol concentration.
Extracorporeal Therapies. The use of extracorporeal mem-
brane oxygenation (ECMO) is a feasible therapeutic option in
children with refractory SF precipitated by septic shock
or sepsis-associated respiratory failure. However, it is recom-
mended that providers search for unrecognized com-
orbidities, such as myocardial dysfunction, neurological
injury, or hypoxemia respiratory failure, prior to activating
the ECMO team, since ECMO support is only potentially
effective when implemented before irreversible organ injury
develops. Therefore, timely ECMO activation and appropriate
patient selection are important and can lead to survival rates
as high as 80%, as demonstrated in newborns.
PROGNOSIS AND OUTCOMES OF SF
Progression of impending SF implies irreversible vital
organ injury, greater number of organs failing, and, poten-
tially, death. Despite the difficulty of assessing health-related
quality of life in children with critical illness, it is not un-
common to observe detrimental effects inmultiple domains
of functioning in survivors of SF. Furthermore, long-term
outcomes after SF have not been completely characterized.
More studies are required to determine the postdischarge
implications of SF.
In summary, early identification and appropriate imple-
mentation of therapeutic strategies are crucial. In addition,
increased understanding of the pathophysiology of SF is
necessary for the development of newer pharmacological
strategies to block the propagation of the systemic inflam-
matory response and to restore normal mitochondrial and
cellular function.
References for this article are at http://pedsinreview.aappublications.
org/content/38/11/520.
SUMMARY1. On the basis of some research evidence, as well as consensus,
recognition of patients at risk for impending systemic failure (SF)in the ward is indicated by changes in the clinical examination orvital signs. (1)(4)(5)(6)
2. On the basis of some research evidence, as well as consensus, theuse of different recognition tools, management guidelines, andpediatric early warning scores and the effective implementationof rapid response teams for the recognition of impending SFimprove patient outcomes. (4)(5)(6)
3. On the basis of strong research evidence, oliguria and furtherneurological deterioration in patients with shock is amanifestation of loss of regional blood flow autoregulation. (5)
4. On the basis of strong research evidence, the goal of hemodynamicsupport in impending SF is tomaintain perfusionpressure above thecritical point, below which blood flow cannot be effectivelymaintained in individual organs. (4)(5)(6)(7)
5. On the basis of strong research evidence, in patients at risk forimpending SF due to septic shock, the administration of broad-spectrum intravenous antimicrobials should occur within thefirst hour of recognition of septic shock. (4)(5)(6)(7)
6. On the basis of primarily consensus, due to lack of relevantclinical studies, nutritional support should be started within 48hours of admission in hemodynamically stable patients. (7)
528 Pediatrics in Review by guest on November 27, 2017http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/Downloaded from
PIR QuizThere are two ways to access the journal CME quizzes:
1. Individual CME quizzes are available via a handy blue CME link under the article title in the Table of Contents of any issue.
2. To access all CME articles, click “Journal CME” from Gateway’s orange mainmenu or go directly to: http://www.aappublications.org/content/journal-cme.
3. To learn how to claim MOC points, go to: http://www.aappublications.org/content/moc-credit.
REQUIREMENTS: Learnerscan take Pediatrics in Reviewquizzes and claim creditonline only at: http://pedsinreview.org.
To successfully complete2017 Pediatrics in Reviewarticles for AMA PRACategory 1 CreditTM, learnersmustdemonstrate aminimumperformance level of 60% orhigher on this assessment. Ifyou score less than60%on theassessment, you will be givenadditional opportunities toanswer questions until anoverall 60% or greater scoreis achieved.
This journal-based CMEactivity is available throughDec. 31, 2019, however, creditwill be recorded in the year inwhich the learner completesthe quiz.
2017 Pediatrics in Review nowis approved for a total of 30Maintenance of Certification(MOC) Part 2 credits by theAmerican Board of Pediatricsthrough the AAP MOCPortfolio Program. Completethe first 10 issues or a total of30 quizzes of journal CMEcredits, achieve a 60% passingscore on each, and startclaiming MOC credits as earlyas October 2017. To learn howto claim MOC points, go to:http://www.aappublications.org/content/moc-credit.
1. The rapid response team (RRT) was called by themother of a 3-month-oldmale infant whowas admitted to the ward with fever and lobar pneumonia. The patient has been receivingsupplemental oxygen and intravenous (IV) antibiotics for 3 days. The mother called theRRT because the baby had been sleepy and had not had a wet diaper in morethan 4 hours. The RRT began assessing the baby for signs of systemic failure (SF). Thepresence of which of the following findings is most likely associated with increasedmortality risk in a patient of this age?
A. Cardiac index of more than 2 L/min per square meter.B. Fever higher than 101.3°F (38.5°C).C. Hypotension.D. Hypoxemia on room air.E. Tachycardia with prolonged capillary refill time.
2. You are completing your shift in the emergency department. SF may manifest in a subtlemanner. Early recognition and diagnosis are key to better outcomes. Among the followingclinical scenarios, which of the clinical presentations should be most concerning forimpending SF?
A. An adolescent with headache and poor sleep.B. An infant who develops poor feeding and irritability.C. An infant with fever and rhinorrhea.D. A school-aged child with abdominal pain and constipation.E. A toddler who has enuresis after successful potty training.
3. Noninvasive monitoring in patients with SF is one of the methods used in management. Anear-infrared spectroscopy monitor, when applied to the forehead, works by measuringwhich of the following patient cerebral parameters?
A. Arterial oxygen concentration.B. Mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate concentration.C. Pulsatile signal.D. Ratio of oxygenated to deoxygenated hemoglobin.E. Venous oxygen concentration.
4. A 14 year-old-boy with dilated cardiomyopathy is admitted to the pediatric intensive careunit with SF and shock. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate nextstep in the management of this patient?
A. Fluid bolus of 20-mL/kg increments.B. Fluid bolus of 100-mL/kg increments.C. Fluid bolus of twice the maintenance volume.D. IV antimicrobials.E. Oral antipyretics.
5. In the case in the previous question,monitoring of which of the following parameters is thebest indicator of effective renal perfusion?
A. Blood urea nitrogen level.B. Fractional excretion of sodium.C. Mean arterial pressure.D. Urine sodium level.E. Urine output.
Vol. 38 No. 11 NOVEMBER 2017 529 by guest on November 27, 2017http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/Downloaded from
DOI: 10.1542/pir.2016-01022017;38;520Pediatrics in Review
Saul Flores and Paul A. ChecchiaRecognition of Impending Systemic Failure
ServicesUpdated Information &
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/38/11/520including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Referenceshttp://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/38/11/520#BIBLThis article cites 8 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at:
Subspecialty Collections
ascular_disorders_subhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/cardiovCardiovascular Disordersogy_subhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/cardiolCardiologyncy_medicine_subhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/emergeEmergency Medicine_care_subhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/criticalCritical Care_policyhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/currentCurrent Policy_cmehttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/journalJournal CMEl_education_subhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/medicaMedical Educationfollowing collection(s): This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
Permissions & Licensing
.xhtmlhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissionsin its entirety can be found online at: Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
Reprints
mlhttp://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtInformation about ordering reprints can be found online:
by guest on November 27, 2017http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/Downloaded from