Real Estate Joint Ventures: Waterfall Structures, Developer Promote, IRR Lookback, Clawback and Catchup Calculating and Structuring Promote, Planning for Phantom Income, and Taxation of Carried Interest Today’s faculty features: 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1. THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2019 Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation with interactive Q&A Seth R. Hoffman, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel, HighBrook Investors, New York Benjamin R. Weber, Partner, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York
40
Embed
Real Estate Joint Ventures: Waterfall Structures, Developer Promote ...media.straffordpub.com/products/real-estate-joint-ventures-waterfall... · 31-01-2019 · Real Estate Joint
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Real Estate Joint Ventures:
Waterfall Structures, Developer Promote,
IRR Lookback, Clawback and CatchupCalculating and Structuring Promote, Planning for Phantom Income, and Taxation of Carried Interest
• Any company formed by two or more parties as the vehicle through which they will make an investment
• “Partnership”/ “Limited Liability Company”
• Although there is of course a substantive difference, we will use the terms as interchangeable, although in practice we work almost exclusively with LLCs
• “Member” / “Partner”
• Also will be used interchangeably
• “Sponsor”
• The initiating Member/Partner; will provide management and earn some incremental additional compensation beyond just a return on its capital investment
• “Investor Member”
• A Member included mainly for the capital it can provide, also sometimes referred to as the “money partner”
1. Purpose – Why is the venture being formed; what is the expected investment timeframe and will there be any limits on the scope of the venture’s business? How many partners and who will they be?
2. Management – Who will control the venture and how? If the Sponsor will manage, will the other partner(s) have approval rights or any other ability to assert control? Can the Managing Member be removed as manager and, if so, when and how will the replacement be determined and what other consequences will be suffered by the Sponsor and its affiliates? How will the partners develop (and update) the venture’s business plan and budget?
3. Capital Contributions – Who can call for additional capital and when? What level of commitment is being given by each partner; will capital be funded pro rata or on some other basis; is the funding obligation mandatory or voluntary; and what will the consequences be if a partner fails to fund when capital is called?
4. Distributions – How and when will revenues be shared among partners?
5. Transfer Rights – What approval will a partner need in order to be able to transfer its interest; and how will that rule apply to indirect transfers?
6. Exit Mechanism; Dispute Resolution – How and when will the venture end? What options will exist if the partners cannot agree on a major decision or if one partner wants or needs to exit and the other is not ready to sell?
• General Rule: Partners owe each other the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care; Managing Member bears this in particular
• Often the Investor Member will disclaim any duties, fiduciary or otherwise, to the fullest extent permitted by law
• Permitted in DE; but no Member can avoid the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (must act with honesty and not contrary to the spirit of the agreement in the performance and enforcement of a contract)
• Disclaimer should not override Managing Member’s responsibility to meet the agreed operating standard
• Consider whether the disclaimer should apply to the non-managing Member if it has replaced the Sponsor as Managing Member (for cause?)
Fiduciary Duty is “something stricter than the morals of the market place. Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most
sensitive, is then the standard of behavior.”1
Fiduciary Duty is “something stricter than the morals of the market place. Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most
sensitive, is then the standard of behavior.”1
1Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545 (N.Y. 1928) (Justice Cardozo).
• The Managing Member/Sponsor may have one or more affiliates that can provide services the JV would otherwise have to hire from a 3rd party
• Examples include:
• Acquisition Fee / Finder’s fee
• Asset Management Fee
• Property Management Fee
• Leasing Agency Fee
• Construction Management Fee
• Financial Advisory Fee
• Disposition Fee
• Guaranty Fee
• Fees to affiliates are generally paid before distributions (although they could be layered into the distribution waterfall) and should be taken into account when assessing overall economics to the Sponsor
• Sponsor affiliates may be able to provide services at a discount to market rate
• Sponsor affiliate may be willing to defer fees during cash flow shortage, something a 3rd party provider would be less likely to accept
• Mortgage lender will expect subordination from affiliate service providers
• Committee of Member Representatives (if so, what vote required?)
• Administrative Member (implies more limited authority)
• Both Members (all actions require joint approval)
• Will Investor Member have any authority to act alone?
• Should represent JV in matters involving possible conflict with the Sponsor (e.g., matters arising pursuant to an agreement between the JV and the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor)
• May reserve a right to act when Sponsor has failed (after notice)
• May retain the right to take any and all Major Decisions unilaterally (particularly if 80% or more of equity)
• Consider what this really means (e.g., can Investor Member amend the LLC agreement, cause breach of loan documents or act in violation of the LLC agreement. . .?)
Guaranty Obligations• JV may need external guaranty to support a financing, lease or other
obligation (common for commercial mortgage debt)
• If a partner provides credit support, directly or through a credit worthy affiliate, the partner or its affiliate may require compensation (e.g., a guaranty fee or incremental additional share of distributions)
• JV agreement should address reimbursement of guaranty payments• Deemed capital contribution by guarantor
• Special capital call to restore balance
• Repayment before distributions
• Special management rights (e.g., right to initiate forced sale)
• Some Major Decisions warrant special consideration (e.g., bankruptcy or other willful breach of loan terms)
• Treatment may be different depending on basis for guaranty claim• Environmental vs. voluntary bankruptcy, transfer in breach or other “bad boy” act)
• May address in JV agreement or in a separate agreement between principals
• Failure to address could result in unintended windfall to unaffiliated partners
• Consider treatment upon transfer by or removal of guarantor/affiliate• Condition buyout (or removal?) upon obtaining release (prospective only)
• Capital normally is called only when $ is needed (timing will impact annualized returns)
• Will partners fund pro rata or on some other basis?
• Pro rata is the norm
• One partner may fund disproportionately initially or until a target is reached
• Preferred equity may defer funding until common equity has achieved minimum target
• Sponsor may have a right to bring in additional partners if initial partners reach a funding limit or otherwise decline further investment
• Will the Sponsor be responsible for cost overruns (e.g., in development project)? Will the Sponsor receive credit for $ contributed to cover overruns and, if so, how and when?
• Managing Member – when needed or when approved by Investor Member (specifically or by virtue of the approved budget)
• Investor Member (when Managing Member is failing to act)
• Is funding voluntary or mandatory? Is there an upper limit?
• What are the remedies/consequences for failure to fund (hard to draft well)
• Return funded capital to the Members pending agreement
• Allow funding Member to cover shortfall as:
• A loan to the Company, to be repaid before distributions to Members;
• A loan to the non-funding Member (to be repaid from distributions otherwise payable to the non-funding Member; any recourse?); or
• Additional capital that dilutes the non-funding Member’s interest
• Funding Member may have the right to convert a Member loan to equity at will or after an agreed delay (to allow non-funding Member to raise funds to repay)
• Penalties for failure to fund capital when called; options include:
• No penalty if funding is not mandatory (but % will be diluted)
• Punitive dilution if funded as equity (e.g., 2:1 credit, with corresponding adjustment to invested capital and % interests)
• Partner loan to non-funding partner or to JV, in either case with interest at a default rate
• Action to compel funding by defaulting partner (or guarantor thereof – not common, but important to consider if an investor funded through a special purpose entity)
• Admit a new investor to fund the shortfall (terms?)
• Buy out defaulting partner • Based on invested capital, FMV or discount to FMV (may be delayed
until a threshold is reached, e.g., dilution below X% or representing more than Y% of initial investment)
• Elimination of rights (vote or other rights; entire interest)
• Loss of capital credit (e.g., 50% reduction in capital contribution credit)
• Special Considerations re Penalty for Failure to Fund
• If non-funding Member is diluted, will there be any change in percentage interest used for subsequent capital calls?
• A Member loan at default interest may be more tax-efficient for the funding Member than imposing punitive dilution due to timing of income recognition
• A REIT may not want to own unsecured debt (bad REIT asset); some REITs propose a special preferred equity interest in lieu of debt (should be available to all Members on same basis)
• Straight up: all distributions paid pro rata in accordance with invested capital
• Priority: to Investor Member until “X”, and then to Sponsor Member as catch-up and thereafter pro rata
• Based on character of funds: e.g., operating revenues per one provision and capital event proceeds per another
• Promote: to all partners pro rata untila certain IRR and thereafter a special allocation to one partner (the “promote” interest) and the balance to all partnerspro rata
• Disproportionate distribution to the Sponsor, usually only after all Members have achieved an agreed minimum return
• Simple example on prior slide
• Terminology: “twenty percent over a five”, which means a special allocation to the Sponsor of 20% of all cash available for distribution after all Members have achieved a 5% IRR
• Consider how the IRR hurdle is drafted (e.g., after a named partner has achieved an agreed IRR vs. after all partners have achieved an agreed IRR)
• Can be portfolio-based or asset-by-asset
• Clawback
• Provision that addresses a situation in which, with the benefit of hindsight, early installments of promote are later determined to have been unwarranted
• Can arise in multi-asset portfolios, if promote is paid on a by-asset basis, and also if additional capital is required after the Sponsor has earned promote
• Can address by return of promote (for reallocation among Members) and/or by adjusting subsequent capital funding to reverse prior promote
• Because Managing Member is often a single purpose entity with no other assets, consider whether a credit parent should guaranty the obligation to fund clawback payments (recognizing that final determination would be made at end of investment, when Managing Member may not be receiving sufficient further distributions to fund the clawback payment)
• Escrow – alternatively, the Managing Member could be required to leave promote payments in escrow (e.g., with the JV) pending confirmation that promote will not be subject to clawback
• Clawback is not always required,particularly if no expectation ofpromote payments before sale
• JVs do not pay entity-level income tax; income, loss and other tax attributes are allocated to Members per JV agreement
• JV gives each partner a report of annual income (Form K-1)
• Income is allocated to the Members in the year realized, regardless of whether the JV actually distributes any cash
• If distributions are not paid on a strictly pro-rata basis, the allocations of tax items (income, loss, deduction) must be made in a manner that corresponds with economic reality
• The tax rules permit more than one method of allocating tax items, and the differences can have a significant impact on the tax treatment of a Member’s investment
• Important to include tax counsel early and throughout the preparation and negotiation of any JV agreement
• JV partners sometimes agree in advance that, if it has the cash available at the end of the year, the JV will make a special distribution to help the partners pay the taxes due as a result of their having been JV partners during that year
• Distributions of this type are referred to as “tax distributions”
• In general, the partners agree that if aggregate distributions to a partner in a particular tax year did not at least match the federal, state and city income tax owed by the partner on income allocated to it for that year (assuming highest marginal tax rates), the JV will make a special distribution to the partner as necessary to cover the shortfall
• Tax distributions, if any, are then taken into account when computing subsequent distributions, and adjustments are made, as necessary to bring the partners back into conformity with the general distribution regime
• JV agreements often prohibit all transfers, unless approved by the Managing Member or pre-approved in the transfer section
• Approving a proposed transfer is often a Major Decision• Does this mean the Managing Member can approve its own
transfers?
• Members sometimes negotiate for pre-approval of:• Transfers to affiliates
• Transfers among existing Members
• Transfers for estate planning
• A transfer if the interest is first offered to existing Member(s)
• Approved transfers are often more accommodating to the Investor Member than the Sponsor/Managing Member
• Consider whether the prohibition should also apply to transfers of interests in a Member (indirect transfers) and, if so, how far up and what exceptions are needed (e.g., for transfers of LP interests in a fund or of publicly traded shares)
Members are reluctant to be trapped in a JV; here are some options if the JV relationship starts to break down:
• If Investor Member owns substantial majority, it may have final say on any disagreement
• Allow transfer of interest – subject to agreed limitations
• Allow transfer after a right of first offer (ROFO)
• Grant the other Member a right of first refusal (ROFR) – right to match
• Buy/sell
• Initiating Member offers to buy the other; recipient must choose either to sell or to reverse the transaction and buy the initiating Member’s interest at the valuation implied by the initial offer
• Can work against a Member with limited access to capital
• Financing and/or credit support arrangements (i.e., a guaranty) may have an impact on decision whether to initiate or how to respond
• Forced sale – the dissatisfied Member can require that the JV market and sell the property and dissolve the JV
• Solves for lack of capital
• Consider who will run the sale process and how
• Non-initiating Member should have option to buy out the initiating Member at implied valuation to avoid sale
• Purchase price is based on hypothetical sale/liquidation
• Should address transfer tax and other costs (actual vs. deemed)
• Arbitration may be good for legitimate dispute re value or another factual matter, but is less useful for mere disagreement about a business decision
• Business teams may be inclined to say “we’ll just have to work it out”, but is bad planning to allow true deadlock
Exit Mechanism; Dispute Resolution, Page 2
Benjamin WeberPartnerSullivan & Cromwell [email protected](212) 558-3159