8/3/2019 Reactors 1
1/53
Performance equations for reactors
output = f(input, kinetics, contacting pattern)
e.g. Fig.4.1.1 (Rich) Mixed reactor with first orderreaction kinetics
We have now seen other reaction rate expressions.
These were obtained in batch reactors, so we are
already familiar with them.
There are other reactor types as well.
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
2/53
Rich, Fig. 4.1.1
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
3/53
Review of figures from Levenspiel
Fig. 4.1 Reactor types
Fig. 4.2 and Eqn.1 Material balance on a reactorvolume element
Fig. 4.3 and Eqn.2 Energy balance on a reactor volumeelement
Fig. 4.4 Review of notation for batch reactors
Fig 5.3 Notation for a mixed reactor
Fig. 5.5 Notation for a plug flow reactorFig. 5.1 The three ideal reactors
Fig. 11.1 nonidealities in flow patterns
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
4/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
5/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
6/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
7/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
8/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
9/53
Notation Summary
C: concentration, mol/L
X: conversion
V: volume, Lv: volumetric flowrate, L/h
F : molar flowrate, mol/h
Subscripts:
A : reactant A0: initial or inlet
f: final or outlet
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
10/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
11/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
12/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
13/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
14/53
Performance equation for a batch reactorreaction = accumulation (no input or output)
tioninterpretagraphicalgivesFigure5.2
1;1
:thesegintegratin
;
:writtenbealsocanwhich
;
0
0
00
0
0
00
AA X
A
A
A
tX
A
A
A
t
A
AA
AA
A
A
A
A
A
dXr
CdtdXVr
Ndt
dt
dXCr
dt
dX
V
Nr
dt
dCr
dt
dNVr
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
15/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
16/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
17/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
18/53
Performance equation for mixed flow reactorsteady state case: (no accumulation)
A
AA
A
A
A
AAAA
A
AAA
AA
r
XC
v
V
r
X
F
V
VrXFFVrREACTION
XFFOUTPUT
CvFINPUT
0
0
0
00
0
000
s
1
:velocityspaceandtimespaceofsdefinitiontheusing
)1(:
)1(:
:
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
19/53
Steady state mixed flow reactor
Again, there will be an algebraic relation in terms of
concentrations and the rate constant for each specificcase, e.g. -rA = kCA CA does not change with time
For a well mixed reactor CAis the same at all points
in the reactor and is equal to the outlet concentrationCAf
A
AA
r
XC
v
V
0
0 s1
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
20/53
Steady state mixed flow reactor
area of rectangle on y vs x coordinates = (y)(x)
Thus Fig 5.4 gives the graphical interpretation of theperformance equation for a mixed flow reactor,comparable to the one for the batch reactor (Fig. 5.2)
A
AA
A
AA
XrC
rXC
vV
1
s
1
0
0
0
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
21/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
22/53
Performance equations
Batch Reactor Mixed Reactor
t
X
A
A
A
dt
dX
r
C
A
0
0
0
1
A
AA
r
XC
0
These can be found in Table 5.1.
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
23/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
24/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
25/53
Performance equation for plug flow reactorsteady state case: (no accumulation)
Mass balance on cylindrical element of small thickness:
From the definition of XA, FA=FA0(1-XA)
dFA=-FA0dXA
Substituting, we get: FA0dXA = (-rA) dV
dVrdFFF
NCONSUMPTIOOUTPUTINPUT
AAAA
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
26/53
Performance equation for plug flow reactor:
AfX
A
A
AdX
rC
0
0
1
But this is exactly what we had for a batch reactor!
Consecutive elements in a plug flow reactor can beanalyzed as individual batch reactors
0
0
000
11
A
A
X
A
A
V
A
C
F
V
dXr
dVF
Af
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
27/53
Systems with varying density
Fractional change in volume of the system between no conversionand complete conversion of reactant A:
(Equation 64, Chp 3)
Typically negligible for liquid systems.
Can be determined from stoichiometry for gaseous systems
0
01
A
AA
X
XX
A
V
VV
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
28/53
Systems with varying density
0
0
00
0
00
1
1
:arranging-re
1
1
)1(
)1(
)1()1(
A
A
A
A
A
A
AA
A
A
AA
AAA
A
AAAAA
C
C
C
C
X
X
XC
XV
XN
V
NC
XNNXVV
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
29/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
30/53
Table 5.1 gave performance equations for thecase of constant density, A=0
Table 5.2 gives performance equations forthe case of varying density, A 0
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
31/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
32/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
33/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
34/53
Example 5.1 demonstrates that we can observe thereaction rate in a mixed flow reactor by observing thesteady state concentrations going in and out of the
reactor We do not even have to use stoichiometry for
observing this but the stoichiometry can also bededuced
Observing the reaction rate does not mean we obtain
a reaction rate expression, or a reaction mechanism
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
35/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
36/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
37/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
38/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
39/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
40/53
Example 5.2 demonstrates that we will needmultiple runs in a mixed flow reactor to arrive
at a reaction rate expression
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
41/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
42/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
43/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
44/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
45/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
46/53
Example 5.3 demonstrates the design of a mixed flowreactor (i.e. the determination of the size) and theoperating conditions (flowrates) required to achieve a
given objective when the reaction stoichiometry andreaction rate expressions are known (probablydetermined in a batch reactor beforehand, using themethods of Chapter 3)
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
47/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
48/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
49/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
50/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
51/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
52/53
8/3/2019 Reactors 1
53/53
Example 5.4 demonstrates the design of a plug flowreactor (the determination of space time, hence thesize for a given flowrate) required to achieve a given
objective when the reaction stoichiometry andreaction rate expressions are known (probablydetermined in a batch reactor beforehand, using themethods of Chapter 3)
It also demonstrates that the integral involved in the
performance equation of a PFR can be evaluatedgraphically or numerically, as well as analyticallywhen that is possible.