Reaction kinetics: 1 st order reactions • • • • • • • • • • • [A] t k 1 A B (+ C ) cay reactions, like radio-activity; reactions [A] k = dt d[A] 1 Rate: - Rewriting: - dt k = [A] d[A] 1 Integration gives: t 0 t 0 ktd d[A] [A] 1 So: ln[A] t – ln[A] 0 = -kt or: = ] A [ ] A [ ln 0 t -kt
36
Embed
Reaction kinetics: 1 st order reactions [A] t Decay reactions, like radio-activity; S N 1 reactions Rate: - Rewriting: - Integration gives: So: ln[A] t.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Reaction kinetics: 1st order reactions•
•••
• • • • • • •
[A]
t
k1A B (+ C)
Decay reactions, like radio-activity;SN1 reactions
[A]k=dt
d[A]1Rate: -
Rewriting: - dtk=[A]
d[A]1
Integration gives: t
0
t
0
ktdtd[A][A]
1
So: ln[A]t – ln[A]0 = -kt or: =]A[
]A[ln
0
t -kt
t 1/2 = ln2/k = 0.693/k
The time for half of the reactant initially present to decompose, its half-time or half-life, t1/2 , is a constant and hence independent of the initial concentration of reactant.
By substituting the relationship [A] = [A0] / 2 when t = t1/2 into ln [A]=ln [A]0 - ktand rearranging:
The half-time for a second order reaction is expressed t 1/2 = 1/k [A]0 and therefore, in contrast to a
first order reaction depends on the initial reactant concentration.
Second-order reaction 2A P
A+B P
Here, the reaction is said to be first order in A and first order in B.
Unimolecular and bimolecular reactions are common. Termolecular reactions are unusual because the simultaneous collision of three molecules is a rare event. Fourth and higher order reactions are unknown.
Sucrose + H2O glucose + fructose
Enzyme Kinetics
ß-fructofuranosidase:
When [S] » [E] : the rate is zero order with respect to sucrose
The Michaelis-Menten Equation
This equation cannot be explicitly integrated, however, without simplifying assumptions, two possibilities are
1. Assumption of equilibrium. Leonor Michaelis and Maud Menten, building on the work of Victor Henri, assumed that k-1 » k2, so that the first step of the reaction reaches equilibrium.
Ks is the dissociation constant of the first step in the enzymatic reaction
The Michaelis-Menten Equation
1. Assumption of steady-state. Figure illustrates the progress curves of the various participants in reaction
under the physiologically common conditions that substrate is in great excess over Enzyme ([S] » [E]).
ES maintains a steady state and [ES] can be treated as having a constant value:
The so called steady state assumption, a more general condition than that of equilibrium, was first proposed in 1925 by G. E. Briggs and B. S. Haldane
The Michaelis constant, KM , is defined as
Letting [E] = [E]T - [ES] and rearranging yields
The Michaelis-Menten Equation
Solving for [ES],
The Michaelis-Menten Equation
The expression of the initial velocity (v0) of the reaction, the velocityat t=0, thereby becomes
The maximal velocity of a reaction, Vmax occurs at high substrate concentrations when the enzyme is saturated, that is, when it is entirely in the ES form
Therefore, combining the last two equations, we obtain:
This expression, the Michaelis-Menten equation, is the basic equation of enzyme kinetic.
Significance of the Michaelis Constant
The Michaelis constant, KM, has a simple operational definition. At the substrate concentration at which [S] = KM, this equation
yields v0 = Vmax/2 so that
KM is the substrate concentration at which the reaction velocity is half maximal
Analysis of Kinetic Data
Lineweaver-Burk or double-reciprocal plot
S >> Kmvi=VmaxVmax= k2Et
Vmax= 10 M/seg Km=10 x10-5 MSi en el ensayo se usaron 5mg/L de preparación enzimática, entonces:v= Vmax = k2 ET k2= 10/5 = 2 moles/mg seg
¿Qué predicciones podemos hacer a partir de esta información?
Significance of the Michaelis Constant
The magnitude of KM varies widely with the identity of the enzyme and the nature of the substrate. It is also a function of temperature and pH. The Michaelis constant can be expressed as
Since Ks is the dissociation constant of the Michaelis complex, as Ks decreases, the enzyme’s affinity for substrate increases. KM in therefore also a measure of the affinity of the enzyme for its substrate, provided k2/k1 is small compared to Ks, that is k2 ‹ k-1 so that the ES P reaction proceeds more slowly than ES reverts to E + S
kcat/KM Is a Measure of Catalytic Efficiency
We can define the catalytic constant, kcat, of an enzyme as
This quantity is also known as the turnover number of an enzyme because it is the number of reaction processes (turnovers) that each active site catalyzes per unit time.
Turn Over Numbers of Enzymes
Catalase H2O2
Carbonic anhydrase HCO3-
Acetylcholinesterase Acetylcholine
40,000,000
400,000
140,000
-Lactamase Benzylpenicillin 2,000
Fumarase Fumarate 800
RecA protein (ATPase) ATP 0.4
Enzymes Substrate kcat (s-1)
The number of product transformed from substrate by one enzyme molecule in one second
Adapted from Nelson & Cox (2000) Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (3e) p.263
kcat/KM Is a Measure of Catalytic Efficiency
When [S] « KM, very little ES is formed. Consequently, [E] ≈ [E]T, so
reduces to a second-order rate equation:
The quantity kcat/KM is a measure of an enzyme’s catalytic efficiency.
There is an upper limit to the value of kcat/KM : It can be not greater than k1; that is, the decomposition of ES to E + P can occur no more frequently than E and S come together to form ES. The most efficient enzymes have kcat/KM values near to the diffusion-controlled limit of 108 to 109 M-1.s-1
Chymotrypsin Has Distinct kcat / Km to Different Substrates
O R O
H3C–C–N–C–C–O–CH3
H H
= – =––
–HGlycine
kcat / Km
1.3 ╳ 10-1
–CH2–CH2–CH3Norvaline 3.6 ╳ 102
–CH2–CH2–CH2–CH3Norleucine 3.0 ╳ 103
–CH2–Phenylalanine 1.0 ╳ 105
(M-1 s-1)
R =
Adapted from Mathews et al (2000) Biochemistry (3e) p.379
- dS/dt = vi = So dX/dt
Al iniciar: t = 0, S = So
A cualquier tiempo:T = t S = S X = (So-S)/So
• As is the case with most reactions, an increase in temperature will result in an increase in kcat for an enzymatic reaction.
• From general principles, it can be determined that the rate of any reaction will typically double for every 10°C increase in temperature.
• Many enzymes display maximum temperatures around 40°C, which is relatively close to body temperature.
• There are enzymes that are isolated from thermophilic organisms that display maxima around 100°C, and some that are isolated from psychrophilic organisms that display maxima around 10°C.
Temperature Dependence of Enzymes
Enzyme Inhibition (Mechanism)
I
I
S
S
S I
I
I II
S
Competitive Non-competitive Uncompetitive
EE
Different siteCompete for
active siteInhibitor
Substrate
Ca
rtoo
n G
uid
eEq
uatio
n an
d De
scrip
tion
[II] binds to free [E] only,and competes with [S];increasing [S] overcomesInhibition by [II].
[II] binds to free [E] or [ES] complex; Increasing [S] cannot overcome [II] inhibition.
[II] binds to [ES] complex only, increasing [S] favorsthe inhibition by [II].
E + S → ES → E + P + II↓EII
←
↑
E + S → ES → E + P + + II II↓ ↓EII + S →EIIS
←
↑ ↑
E + S → ES → E + P + II ↓ EIIS
←
↑
EI
S X
Juang RH (2004) BCbasics
Competitive Inhibition
Succinate Glutarate Malonate Oxalate
Succinate Dehydrogenase
Substrate Competitive InhibitorProduct
Adapted from Kleinsmith & Kish (1995) Principles of Cell and Molecular Biology (2e) p.49
C-OO-
C-H C-H C-OO-
C-OO-
H-C-H H-C-H C-OO-
C-OO-
H-C-H H-C-H H-C-H C-OO-
C-OO-
C-OO-
C-OO-
H-C-H C-OO-
Sulfa Drug Is Competitive Inhibitor
-COOHH2N-
-SONH2H2N-
PrecursorFolicacid
Tetrahydro-folic acid
SulfanilamideSulfa drug (anti-inflammation)
Para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA)
Bacteria needs PABA for the biosynthesis of folic acid
Sulfa drugs has similar structure with PABA, andinhibit bacteria growth.
Adapted from Bohinski (1987) Modern Concepts in Biochemistry (5e) p.197
Domagk (1939)
Enzyme Inhibition
Competitive Inhibition
Many substances alter the activity of an enzyme by reversibly combining with it in a way what influence the binding of substrate and/or its turnover number. Substances that reduce an enzyme’s activity in this way are known as inhibitors
A substance that competes directly with a normal substrate for an enzyme’s substrate-binding site is known as a competitive inhibitor.
Here it is assumed that I, the inhibitor, bind reversibly to the enzyme and is in a rapid equilibrium with it so that
And EI, the enzyme-inhibitor complex, is catalytically inactive. A competitive inhibitor therefore reduces the concentration of free enzyme available for substrate binding.
Enzyme Inhibition
This is the Michaelis-Menten equation that has been modified by a factor, , which is defined as
Competitive Inhibition
Is a function of the inhibitor’s concentration and its affinity for the enzyme. It cannot be less than 1.
Enzyme Inhibition
Competitive Inhibition
Recasting in the double-reciprocal form yields
A plot of this equation is linear and has a slope of KM/Vmax, a 1/[S] intercept of -1/ KM, and a 1/v0 intercept of 1/ Vmax
Enzyme Inhibition
Uncompetitive Inhibition
In uncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds directly to the enzyme-substrate complex but not to the free enzyme
In this case, the inhibitor binding step has the dissociation constant
The uncompetitive inhibitor, which need not resemble the substrate, presumably distorts the active site, thereby rendering the enzyme catalytically inactive.
Enzyme Inhibition
Uncompetitive Inhibition
The double-reciprocal plot consists of a family of parallel lines with slope KM/Vmax, 1/v0 intercepts of ’/Vmax and 1/[S] intercept of -’/KM
A mixed inhibitor binds to enzyme sites that participate in both substrate binding and catalysis. The two dissociation constants for inhibitor binding
Double-reciprocal plots consist of lines that have the slope KM/Vmax, with a 1/v0 intercept of ’/Vmax and 1/[S] intercept of -’/ KM
Km
Enzyme Inhibition (Plots)
I II Competitive Non-competitive Uncompetitive
Dir
ect
Plo
tsD
ou
ble
Rec
ipro
cal
Vmax Vmax
Km Km’ [S], mM
vo
[S], mM
vo
II II
Km [S], mM
Vmax
II
Km’
Vmax’Vmax’
Vmax unchangedKm increased
Vmax decreasedKm unchanged
Both Vmax & Km decreased
II
1/[S]1/Km
1/vo
1/ Vmax
II
Two parallellines
II
Intersect at X axis
1/vo
1/ Vmax
1/[S]1/Km 1/[S]1/Km
1/ Vmax
1/vo
Intersect at Y axis
= Km’
Juang RH (2004) BCbasics
Bisubstrate Reactions
Almost all of these so called bisubstrate reactions are either transferase reactions in which enzyme catalyzed the transfer of a specific functional group, X, from one of the substrates to the other:
or oxidation-reduction reactions in which reducing equivalents are transferred between two substrates.
Sequential Reactions
Reactions in which all substrates must combine with the enzyme before a reaction can occur and products be released are known as Sequential reactions
Sequential Reactions
Ordered bisubstrate reaction
Random bisubstrate reaction
A and B : substrates in order that they add to the enzymeP and Q : products in order that they leave the enzyme
Group-transfer reactions in which one or more products are released before all substrates have been added are known as Ping Pong reactions