UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON DEPT. OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION NEW TEACHER WEBINAR 4 Advice for New Teachers SATURDAY, JANUARY 25, 2014 1-2 PM REACHING AND TEACHING STUDENTS IN POVERTY WITH DR. PAUL GORSKI *Recordings will be available of webinars. No names will be visible in the recordings. The recording will be available on our YouTube channel: http :// www.youtube.com/utanewteachers Dr. Paul Gorski
50
Embed
“Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty: Strategies for Erasing the Opportunity Gap”
UTA New Teacher Webinar “Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty: Strategies for Erasing the Opportunity Gap”, January 25, 2014 w/ Dr. Paul Gorski
Dr. Paul Gorski, Associate Professor, George Mason University
Bio: Paul C. Gorski is the founder of EdChange (www.edchange.org) and an Associate Professor of Integrative Studies (Social Justice Concentration) at George Mason University. His most recent books include Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty: Strategies for Erasing the Opportunity Gap and The Poverty and Education Reader: A Call for Equity in Many Voices (with Julie Landsman).
The University of Texas of Arlington presents the Spring, 2014 New Teacher Webinar Series as part of our Teacher Induction Project. The purpose of the Teacher Induction Project is to build "digital community" for current students and alumni of the department as well as new teachers beyond UT Arlington in the global community.
Link to the recording: https://elearn.uta.edu/webapps/bb-collaborate-bb_bb60/recording/launchGuest?uid=8675f213-60b0-45ae-a1a3-e7af9617318e
Recordings available in archives
YouTube Channel (UTA New Teachers) https://www.youtube.com/user/UTANewTeachers
slideshare (UTA New Teachers): http://www.slideshare.net/utanewteachers and today's slideshare (1/25/14): http://www.slideshare.net/UTANewTeachers/reaching-and-teaching-students-in-poverty-strategies-for-erasing-the-opportunity-gap
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTONDEPT. OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTIONNEW TEACHER WEBINAR 4Advice for New TeachersSATURDAY, JANUARY 25, 2014 1-2 PM
REACHING AND TEACHING STUDENTS IN POVERTY WITH DR. PAUL GORSKI *Recordings will be available of webinars. No names will be visible in the recordings.
The recording will be available on our YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/utanewteachers
Thanks for joining us! Please use the marker/pen tool to mark a small x below where you are at. You can also type it in the chat window:
Poll question: Where are you in your teaching
career? Select A-E Voting is optional! We will display the results! The drop down polling area is in the participants window next to the “hand” tool.
I am currently a:
A. Pre-service teacherB. First year teacherC. 2nd or 3rd year teacherD. 4th year+ teacherE. Faculty or none of the above
Anticipating learning…
What do you hope to learn?
Optional-type in the chat window
Please feel free to ask questions along the way, too!
Bio: Dr. Paul GorskiGeorge Mason University
Bio:
Paul C. Gorski is the founder of EdChange (www.edchange.org) and an Associate Professor of Integrative Studies (Social Justice Concentration) at George Mason University. His most recent books include Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty: Strategies for Erasing the Opportunity Gap and The Poverty and Education Reader: A Call for Equity in Many Voices (with Julie Landsman).
Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty: An Equity Literacy Approach
Paul C. GorskiEdChange & George Mason University
ObjectivesWe will: Learn about the major themes from the last 20 years of
research on teaching students in poverty; Consider what approaches for educating low-income
students might look like if we more fully understand their experiences with poverty; and
Become familiar with on-the-ground, research-based strategies for reaching and teaching students in poverty.
18
How I Know that “the Poor” Aren’t “the Problem?”
* * *
19
Starting Assumptions1. Poor people bear the brunt of almost
every imaginable social ill in the U.S.
2. It is not every educator’s responsibility to eradicate global poverty
3. However, if we don’t understand systems of poverty, we cannot understand our low-income students
20
Barriers to Progress1. Thinking we can eliminate economic
achievement gap without eradicating poverty
2. Thinking we can eliminate economic achievement gap by “fixing” poor people rather than fixing the things that disenfranchise poor people
3. School “reform” initiatives that are making things much, much worse
21
The Big Context:Poor families bear the brunt of every imaginable social ill, including lack of access to:
Healthcare Good nutrition Recreation (like playgrounds) Living wage jobs
And.. Higher rates of chronic illnesses
***Rarely do conversations about poverty and schooling in the U.S. take this context into account.
22
Equity Literacy: Principles
Outcome inequalities do not result primarily from cultural defects in low-income families
Outcome inequalities do result primarily from inequitable access to resources and experiences in and out of school
Our job as educators is to refuse to replicate that inequitable access in our spheres of influence—a matter of equity, not a matter of culture
23
A Bit of a Shocker, Perhaps
One of the factors that best predicts how well a student in poverty performs is who or what her or his teachers blame for poverty
Students whose teachers believe that poor people are poor because of their own deficiencies perform worse in school
Students whose teachers refuse to blame poor families for their poverty perform better in school
So our first step has to be shifting our attitudes about poverty and dropping the deficit views of low-income families
24
The Opportunity Gap
Not arguing that every educator is responsible for eliminating all of the inequities that make up this gap,
but that understanding students in poverty means understanding how it affects their experiences at school
and in our spheres of influence.
25
Out-of-School Opportunity Gap
This opportunity gap is characterized by lack of access to:
Healthcare, including preventative healthcare
Quality childcareTutoring and other “shadow education”Recreational opportunitiesSafe housingWell-stocked public librariesValidating society
26
In-School Opportunity Gap
This opportunity gap is characterized by the lack of access to:
Quality preschool Adequately funded schools School nurses, counselors, and other school
support services Affirming school environments (bullying) High academic expectations Higher-order, engaging pedagogies Opportunities for family engagement
27
Case Study: Family Engagement
Families in poverty don’t value education, which is why they don’t participate in school-based involvement as consistently as wealthier families (culture of poverty view)
Opportunities for family engagement are not structured in ways that make sense for caretakers who work multiple jobs, work nights, can’t afford childcare, don’t have paid leave, use public transportation… (equity literacy view)
How might we solve this problem differently given these different views?
28
Research-Based Strategies for Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty
Incorporate music, art, and theater across the curriculum (Pogrow, 2006; Wetz, 2004).
Less likely to have access out of school Improves engagement and performance
across subjects
29
Research-Based Strategies for Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty
Have and communicate high expectations (Figlio, 2005; Jessim & Harber, 2005; Rouse & Barrow, 2006).
Pedagogically, especially
30
Research-Based Strategies for Reaching and Teaching Students in Poverty
Almy, S., & Theokas, C. (2010). Not prepared for class: High-poverty schools continue to have fewer in-field teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
Basch, C. (2011). Physical activity and the achievement gap among urban minority youth. Journal of School Health, 81(10), 626-634.
Children’s Defense Fund [CDF]. (2008). Child poverty in America. Retrieved March 22, 2011, from http://www.childrensdefense.org/child-research-data-publications/data/child-poverty-in-america.pdf
CDF. (2010). The state of America’s School. Washington, DC: Author.Duke, N. K., Purcell-Gates, V., Hall, L. A., & Tower, C. (2006). Authentic literacy
activities for developing comprehension and writing. Reading Teacher, 60, 344–355.
Fahlman, M. M., Hall, H. L., and Lock, R. (2006). Ethnic and socioeconomic comparisons of fitness, activity levels, and barriers to exercise in high school females. Journal of School Health, 76(1), 12-17.
Figlio, D. N. (2005). Names, expectations, and the black-white achievement gap. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Freeman, E. (2010). The shifting geography of urban education. Education and Urban Society, 42(6), 674-704.
Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
Jennings, P. K. (2004). What mothers want: Welfare reform and maternal desire. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 31(3), 113-130.
42
ReferencesJessim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-
fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131-155.
Jones, S. (2008). Grass houses: Representations and reinventions of social class through children's literature. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 4(2), 40-58.
Kelley, J. E., and Darragh, J. J. (2011). Depictions and gaps: Portrayal of U.S. poverty in realistic fiction children’s picture books. Reading Horizons, 50(4), 263-282.
Kellett, M. (2009). Children as researchers: What we can learn from them about the impact of poverty on literacy opportunities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4), 395-408.
Kennedy, E. (2010). Improving literacy achievement in a high-poverty school: Empowering classroom teachers through professional development. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 384-387.
Li, G. (2010). Race, class, and schooling: Multicultural families doing the hard work of home literacy in America’s inner city. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26, 140-165.
Machan, S., Wilson, J., and Notar, C. (2005). Parental involvement in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 13-16.
43
ReferencesPatterson, J. A., Hale, D., & Stessman, M. (2008). Cultural
contradictions and school leaving: A case study of an urban high school. The High School Journal, 91(2), 1-16.
Pogrow, S. (2006). Restructuring high-poverty elementary schools for success: A description of the Hi-Perform school design. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(3), 223-229.
Ramalho, E. M., Garza, E., and Merchant, B. (2010). Successful school leadership in socioeconomically challenging contexts: School principals creating and sustaining successful school improvement. International Studies in Educational Administration, 38(3), 35-56.
Robinson, J. G. (2007). Presence and persistence: Poverty ideology and inner-city teaching. Urban Review, 39, 541-565.
Rouse, C. E., & Barrow, L. (2006). U.S. elementary and secondary schools: Equalizing opportunity or replacing the status quo? The Future of Children, 16(2), 99-123.
Sánchez , L. (in press). Fostering wideawakeness: Third grade children researching their community. In J. Landsman & P. Gorski (Eds.), The poor are not the problem: Insisting on class equity in schools. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
44
ReferencesSano, J. (2009). Farmhands and factory workers, honesty and humility:
The portrayal of social class and morals in English language learner children’s books. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2560-2588.
Sherman, J. (2006). Coping with rural poverty: Economic survival and moral capital in rural America. Social Forces, 85(2), 891-913.
Streib, J. (2011). Class reproduction by four year olds. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 337-352.
Tayler, P., Kochhar, R., Fry, R., Velasco, G., & Motel, S. (2010). Wealth gaps rise to record highs between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.
Vera, D. (2011). Using popular culture print to increase emergent literary skills in one high-poverty school district. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(3), 307-330.
West-Olatunji, C., Sanders, T., Mehta, S., & Behar-Horenstein, L. (2010). Parenting practices among low-income parents/guardians of academically successful fifth grade African American children. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(3), 138-144.
Wetz, J. (2004) Promoting inclusion in school through the arts: a case study, Support for Learning, 19(20), 66–70.
45
A big THANK YOU to our panelists and faculty!
Thanks to everyone for attending!
Let’s give the panelists a virtual round of applause for taking time to share their expertise and experience with us!
What do you think?Optional-type in the chat window!
What information stood out to you from
Dr. Gorski’s presentation?
What questions do you have?
“I hope to think more about.…”“I learned….”“I want to know….”
Recording will be here on the UTA New Teacher Blog