Top Banner
BioSharing – connecting data policies, standards & databases in the life sciences BioSharing WG Peter McQuilton, PhD Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Rebecca Lawrence and Simon Hodson 06/03/2017 rd-alliance.org 1
11

RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

Apr 13, 2017

Download

Science

Peter McQuilton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 1

BioSharing – connecting data policies, standards &

databases in the life sciences BioSharing WG

Peter McQuilton, PhDSusanna-Assunta Sansone, Rebecca

Lawrence and Simon Hodson

06/03/2017

Page 2: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 2

What challenges did the WG face? What were the aims?

To develop guidelines for linking information on databases, content standards and journal and funder data policies in the life sciences

06/03/2017

Data policies by funders, journals and other organizations

(100s)

Database, tools and services

(>1000)

Data/metadata standards(650+)

Formats Terminologies Guidelines

Page 3: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 3

What challenges did the WG face? What were the aims?

To develop a curated registry (running since 2011), to access and cross-search this information, such that a variety of stakeholders can make decisions on which standards and databases to use or endorse

https://www.biosharing.org

06/03/2017

Page 4: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

A web-based, curated and searchable portal that monitors the development and evolution of standards, their use in databases and the adoption of both in data

policies, to inform and educate the user community.

What is BioSharing?

06/03/2017 rd-alliance.org 9

Page 5: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

Describe the output – biosharing.org

06/03/2017 rd-alliance.org 8

Page 6: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 6

What are the ramifications of not having the problem resolved?

Standards are reinventedDatabases use the wrong standards

Data policies fail to endorse appropriate resourcesIncreasingly, data is lost as it is not • Findable• Accessible• Interoperable• Reusable

(The FAIR principles)

06/03/2017

Page 7: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 7

Who is affected by this WG?Data creators and (re)users in

the life, biomedical and environmental sciences

People who recommend or endorse the use of data standards and databases in the life, biomedical and environmental sciences

06/03/2017

Page 8: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 8

Describe the Working Group structure (how many members, diversity of experience, geographies, etc.)

>50 members from around the worldStandard/database developersFundersJournal data editorsResearchersData managers/librarians

06/03/2017

Page 9: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

RDA/Force11 BioSharing WG

Page 10: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

Standard developing groups, incl.:Journals/publishers/Funders, incl.:

BioTools

Cross-links and data exchange, incl.:

Societies and organisations, incl.: Institutional RDM services, incl.:

Projects/programmes, incl.:

Adoption & Implementation

06/03/2017 rd-alliance.org 10

Page 11: RDA Plenary 9 BioSharing WG output/recommendation

rd-alliance.org 11

Feedback and commentsOutput report available now

Help us define and refine our guidelines for linking data policies, databases and data standards in the life, biomedical and environmental sciences

Contacts: [email protected] [email protected]

06/03/2017