FinGaryEsq. Law Oice of Gary Fin 8263 2Hghwa y 11, Suite 2 IndoCA 9200Executive Oce r Immgraton Rvew Board of Immigration Apeals Oce of he Cek LS/CE Office of Chi ef Cousel IMP 115 Nmperial AveECetoCA 92243 Name: GALVEZ VDOVINOSRAUA 090-066373 Dae of this oice: 11/2/201closed s a copy of he Board'desod oder n e above-reenced cae. Ecose PMbCy, hScely, DC wDona Carr Ceerk kn For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished Cite as: Raul Galvez Valdovinos, A090 066 373 (BIA Nov. 21, 2014)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
No ce S 212 (a (2 (A )(i)( , N Ac 8 U S C§ l182 (a )(2 )( (i)( ) ] -Controlled subs ce iolation
PLICAT ON Term nation
he Dep ent of Homeland S rity ("DHS ) app als om the Immi ion Judge's D ember 14 2 12, deci io ter nati g the r pon ent s re ov roce ing responde t, a ve d citize of Mexico d la l pe ent reside of the Un ted St e ,oppo es he app a The appe w ll b dismiss
e re ew r cle e or the n i gs o fac clu ing the d natio of credib lmade by he Immi on udge 8 C.F.R§ 003. (d)( )(i). We review de novo l o er issues,
nclud g w ther the ie have me the relev t burden of proo i sues of discre8 C F.R § 003. (d ( 3)(ii)
We adopt nd f t Im i a on udge s decision te mi at ng e res ond s rproce ngs The respondent was ch ged wit being removable a an alien convi e ocon ll subs nce violation as a re lt of a 1999 convi on r po session of a con ollesubs ce in violation o io 11 77 o Cali a H lt S e Code that case, e re pondent r eived a de ed en o jud ent d the case was d sm ss on June 122 0, r e succes l y com le the requ ed div ion pro( J at 1
The DHS contends on app that the r s on ent s 9 o ens ted i a c nvnder se ion 10(a )( 48 A of the mi io d Nation ity Act 8 U S C§1101(a ( 8 A )
The HS sser s hat the deci ion o the nit d St es Cou o pea s r the i CircL A endz v. IS 222 F d 728 749(9 C 2000 , which provid to the contradoes not apply thi c e b e it was ove led byNunez-R es v Holr, 646 F 3d 68 ,
ITED STATES DEP TMENT OF JUSTICEEXECUT VE OFF CE FOR M G TION REVIEW
GR T ON CO RT2409 A BRUCHER E RO
IMPERIAL CA 92251
AW OFF CE OF G Y FIG Y FI , ESQ;82632 H Y 11 , STE B-2
ND O CA 92201
Date: Dec 1 20 2
File A090 0 6 7
n he Ma er of:GA Z VA DO NOS RAU
� At ached is a copy of the wri en decisio of he Immigra io Judge.This decision is fin l u less appe is aken o he Board of
mmigratio Appeals The e closed copies of FO EOIR 26 Notice o Appeal a d FORM EO R 27 Notice of E r as A tor ey orReprese a ive properl exec ed m st be f led wi h the Board of
mmigr io Appeals on or beforeThe appeal mus be accompanied by proo of paid fee ($ 0 00)
E c osed is copy of he oral decision
E closed is a ranscrip of the tes imo y o record.
Yo are gran ed ntil to s it a briefo his office i s ppor of your appea
Opposi g co sel is gra ed u i o s bmi a brief i opposi ion o he appeal
� nclosed is copy of the order/decis o of he mmigra ion Jud e
papers fi ed wi he Cour sha l be accompa ied by proofof service upo oppo ing counse
cc DISTR CT CO SE1115 N IM ER A AE ENT O A 9224 0000
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JS ICEEXC TIV OFFICE FOR IMMIGRA ION REVIEW
IM I RA ON COU TI PE L, C IFO
F LE O 9 066 373
)IN HE TE OF: )
)aul G Z Val ov nos )
esponde )
A P ICATION Mo on o Te na e
On Behalf of esponde tGa y F nn82632 g way 11 , Su te B-2
nd o, C 90014
MOV PROCEEDI GS
December 14 20
O e a f f t e G v rnme t
W a o e c5 N I per a ve
El Cen ro C 9 243
ECISION AN O ER T G MOT O O E M E
On Oc o er 6, 2 1 , e Dep ent o Ho e d ecur y eg heseremova proceed ngs w e l ng of a No ce o A e da ed Se ember 28,20 1 T s no ce o a e s perseded a No ce o Appear ssued l 25, 1In e ed No ce o A e , D S c arged a e res onden s removab e forhav ng been conv c ed n J y 999 of a con ro ed subs ce o ense re a g
e possess on of me p e ne n v o at on of§ 11377 of e Cal fo aea a d Sa y Code T e responden oved to e m na e e roceed ngs
because e wa gr ed a defe ed en y of d en der§ 000 of e
Ca fo a Penal Code T e respon en 's case a d sm ssed on J e 2, 0 ,a er e success ly co p eted e equ ements of e d vers on s a u e
e p es o od spu te he ovee d t oo e c so the c e Theys pl sagree a out e appl ca l y oujan- m nd v F 3d 7 8(9 h Cr . 0 T a case hel t a conv ct ons n state co a e no conv c onun er t e m g a on c ey wou d qual or rel ef under e ederal