doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12517385.v1 Rapid Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease from Sebum using Paper Spray Ionisation Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Depanjan Sarkar, Drupad Trivedi, Eleanor Sinclair, Sze Hway Lim, Caitlin Walton-Doyle, Kaneez Jafri, Joy Milne, Monty Silverdale, Perdita Barran Submitted date: 19/06/2020 • Posted date: 26/06/2020 Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Citation information: Sarkar, Depanjan; Trivedi, Drupad; Sinclair, Eleanor; Lim, Sze Hway; Walton-Doyle, Caitlin; Jafri, Kaneez; et al. (2020): Rapid Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease from Sebum using Paper Spray Ionisation Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. ChemRxiv. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12517385.v1 Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder for which identification of robust biomarkers to complement clinical PD diagnosis would accelerate treatment options and help to stratify disease progression. Here we demonstrate the use of paper spray ionisation coupled with ion mobility mass spectrometry (PSI IM-MS) to determine diagnostic molecular features of PD in sebum. PSI IM-MS was performed directly from skin swabs, collected from 34 people with PD and 30 matched control subjects as a training set and a further 91 samples from 5 different collection sites as a validation set. PSI IM-MS elucidates ~ 4200 features from each individual and we report two classes of lipids (namely phosphatidylcholine and cardiolipin) that differ significantly in the sebum of people with PD. Putative metabolite annotations are obtained using tandem mass spectrometry experiments combined with accurate mass measurements. Sample preparation and PSI IM-MS analysis and diagnosis can be performed ~5 minutes per sample offering a new route to for rapid and inexpensive confirmatory diagnosis of this disease. File list (2) download file view on ChemRxiv D.Sarkar PSI IM-MS Sebum Parkinsons disease.pdf (1.62 MiB) download file view on ChemRxiv D.Sarkar PSI IM-MS Sebum Parkinsons disease SI.pdf (2.03 MiB)
27
Embed
Rapid Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease from Sebum using ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12517385.v1
Rapid Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease from Sebum using Paper SprayIonisation Ion Mobility Mass SpectrometryDepanjan Sarkar, Drupad Trivedi, Eleanor Sinclair, Sze Hway Lim, Caitlin Walton-Doyle, Kaneez Jafri, JoyMilne, Monty Silverdale, Perdita Barran
Submitted date: 19/06/2020 • Posted date: 26/06/2020Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Citation information: Sarkar, Depanjan; Trivedi, Drupad; Sinclair, Eleanor; Lim, Sze Hway; Walton-Doyle,Caitlin; Jafri, Kaneez; et al. (2020): Rapid Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease from Sebum using Paper SprayIonisation Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. ChemRxiv. Preprint.https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12517385.v1
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder for which identification ofrobust biomarkers to complement clinical PD diagnosis would accelerate treatment options and help to stratifydisease progression. Here we demonstrate the use of paper spray ionisation coupled with ion mobility massspectrometry (PSI IM-MS) to determine diagnostic molecular features of PD in sebum. PSI IM-MS wasperformed directly from skin swabs, collected from 34 people with PD and 30 matched control subjects as atraining set and a further 91 samples from 5 different collection sites as a validation set. PSI IM-MS elucidates~ 4200 features from each individual and we report two classes of lipids (namely phosphatidylcholine andcardiolipin) that differ significantly in the sebum of people with PD. Putative metabolite annotations areobtained using tandem mass spectrometry experiments combined with accurate mass measurements.Sample preparation and PSI IM-MS analysis and diagnosis can be performed ~5 minutes per sample offeringa new route to for rapid and inexpensive confirmatory diagnosis of this disease.
phosphatidylserine (brain, porcine) (sodium salt) (PS), and 1',3'-bis[1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-
3-phospho]-glycerol (sodium salt) (18:1 cardiolipin) (CL). Tandem mass (MS2) spectra were
recorded for these lipids using PSI-MS. Solutions (1 mM) of PC in CHCI3:MeOH (50:50, v/v),
PS in CHCl3, and CL in MeOH were used for tandem mass spectrometric measurements. A
source was designed in-house (using Autodesk Inventor 2018) and 3D-printed (Ultimaker 3
Extended, GoPrint3D, Ripon, UK) for paper spray analysis on a Waters Synapt G2-Si HDMS
mass spectrometer. Copper micro-alligator clips (Premier Farnell UK Ltd., UK) were used to
hold the paper triangles at a high potential, followed by positioning it close to the MS inlet.
Medical Q-tips swabs (Fisher Scientific, UK and Copan Diagnostics, USA) were used for
sample collection.
Study Participants
For initial method development of paper spray ionization mass spectrometry (PSI-
MS) using sebum, samples from healthy controls were used. The developed method was
further tested using samples from participants with PD. The participants for this study were
part of a recruitment process taking place at 27 NHS clinics all over the UK (Table S1). A
subset comprising, 34 people with PD and 30 matched control subjects, was measured as a
training set and a further 91 (47 PD and 44 control) samples from 5 different collection sites
13
were used as a validation set. Ethical approval for this project (IRAS project ID 191917) was
obtained from the NHS Health Research Authority (REC reference: 15/SW/0354).
Sample Collection
Sebum samples were non-invasively swabbed from the mid-back of participants with
medical Q-tip swabs. Each swab, secured in its individual holder, was transported under
ambient conditions in sealed envelopes to the central facility at the University of
Manchester, where they were stored at -80 ⁰C until analysis.
Paper spray ionization mass spectrometry (PSI MS)
Sebum was transferred from the Q-tip swabs onto the paper substrates by gentle
touch and roll of the swab on to the sampling area. After sample transfer, the paper triangle
was clipped onto the copper alligator clip using tweezers avoiding contamination. Each
copper clip was cleaned by ultrasonication in acetone before use. For each sample, a new
clip and tweezer was employed to avoid cross-contamination. The clip was connected to a
custom paper spray ion source built in-house, adapted to the Synapt G2 Si HDMS ion
mobility mass spectrometer. PSI MS measurements were commenced by positioning the
paper tip in front of the MS inlet using a movable xyz nESI stage and subsequently applying a
voltage (2.5-3 kV) to the alligator clip by adapting the ESI capillary voltage supply. Upon
elution with a polar solvent at that elevated potential, a spray plume of tiny charged
droplets was observable at the tip of the paper simultaneously with the appearance of ion
signal.
All mass spectra were recorded over the range of m/z 50-2000. The critical
instrument parameters for each PSI-MS experiment were: capillary voltage at 2.5 kV, source
temperature at 80oC, sampling cone at 30 V and source offset of 40 V. No desolvation or
cone gas was used. Mass spectra were recorded for two minutes at a scan rate of 2 sec per
scan. A total of 60 scans were used for further data analysis.
Use of internal standards
To check the reproducibility of paper spray across different samples, TM was used.
For these experiments, 3.5μL of the TM solution was spotted on paper triangles and air-
14
dried. Dried paper triangles were used for PSI MS measurements of sebum samples
following an identical method described in the previous paragraph.
Data processing
After recording IM MS data from all the participant samples under identical
conditions, the raw data were deconvolved using Progenesis QI (Waters, Wilmslow, UK).
Peak picking initially identifies accurate mass m/z values and coincident ion mobility drift
times (DT). These correlated m/z-DT features are then aligned, and area normalization
carried out with reference to the best candidate sample, within the entire data set, chosen
by default set of parameters. Peak picking limits were set to automatic with default noise
levels, to balance signal to noise ratio according to the data quality. Signal acquired before
0.1 min of infusion and after 1.4 min of infusion were discarded during processing to only
retain reproducible signal. For annotation, accurate mass features were extracted and mass
matched with both the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) and LipidMaps.22,23
Validation of PS-IM-MS data and extension to other sites
To determine the significance of this approach we repeated the analysis with ten PD
samples from five additional collection sites, to investigate the influence of location or the
person who collected sebum on the data. Principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure S8),
support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) modelling classified samples by
collection sites. No obvious separation was possible using PCA, as expected for complex
data, since PCA is an unsupervised method of dimension reduction. To employ supervised
learning, the samples were repeatedly split into training set (75%) and a test set (25%) for
100 times. Each time a model was trained on training set and then tested using test set. The
prediction output from each test was output as a confusion matrix. Finally, a confusion
matrix representing the average of 100 tests was reported (Table S2 and S3 for SVM and RF
models, respectively). This analysis indicates that this data cannot be classified by collection
site, further, since samples from different sites and patients were acquired on different
days, we surmise that PSI IM-MS can be applied to detect differences in the molecular
composition of sebum that can diagnose PD without influence from the sampling
environment nor batching effects.
15
TOC
PSI IM MS
PD Control
Sebum
References:
1 Fereshtehnejad, S.-M. et al. Burden of neurodegenerative diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 1990–2016: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. European Journal of Neurology 26, 1252-1265, doi:10.1111/ene.13972 (2019).
2 Hassan, Q., Li, S., Ferrag, C. & Kerman, K. Electrochemical biosensors for the detection and study of α-synuclein related to Parkinson's disease - A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 1089, 32-39, doi:10.1016/j.aca.2019.09.013 (2019).
3 Moustafa, A. A. et al. Motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A unified framework. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 68, 727-740 (2016).
4 https://parkinsonsdisease.net/basics/statistics/ 5 Stocchi, F. & Olanow, C. W. Obstacles to the Development of a Neuroprotective Therapy for
Parkinson's Disease. Movement Disorders 28, 3-7, doi:10.1002/mds.25337 (2013). 6 Marek, K. & Jennings, D. Can we image premotor Parkinson disease? Neurology 72, S21-S26,
doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318198df97 (2009). 7 Krestin, D. The Seborrhoeic Facies as a Manifestation of Post-Encephalitic Parkinsonism and
Allied Disorders. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine os-21, 177-186, doi:10.1093/qjmed/os-21.81.177 (1927).
8 Ravn, A.-H., Thyssen, J. P. & Egeberg, A. Skin disorders in Parkinson's disease: potential biomarkers and risk factors. Clin., Cosmet. Invest. Dermatol. 10, 87-92, doi:10.2147/ccid.s130319 (2017).
9 Arsic Arsenijevic, V. S. et al. A laboratory-based study on patients with Parkinson’s disease and seborrheic dermatitis: the presence and density of Malassezia yeasts, their different species and enzymes production. BMC Dermatology 14, 5, doi:10.1186/1471-5945-14-5 (2014).
10 Stewart, M. E. & Downing, D. T. Chemistry and function of mammalian sebaceous lipids. Adv. Lipid Res. 24, 263-301 (1991).
11 Lovaszi, M., Szegedi, A., Torocsik, D., Szegedi, A. & Zouboulis, C. C. Sebaceous-immunobiology is orchestrated by sebum lipids. Dermatoendocrinol 9, e1375636 (2017).
12 Trivedi, D. K. et al. Discovery of Volatile Biomarkers of Parkinson's Disease from Sebum. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 599-606, doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00879 (2019).
13 Sinclair, E. et al. Sebum: a window into dysregulation of mitochondrial metabolism in Parkinson's disease. ChemRxiv, 1-20 (2020).
14 Damon, D. E. et al. Direct Biofluid Analysis Using Hydrophobic Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 88, 1878-1884, doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04278 (2016).
15 Espy, R. D. et al. Paper Spray and Extraction Spray Mass Spectrometry for the Direct and Simultaneous Quantification of Eight Drugs of Abuse in Whole Blood. Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 86, 7712-7718, doi:10.1021/ac5016408 (2014).
16 Michely, J. A., Meyer, M. R. & Maurer, H. H. Paper Spray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Comprehensive Urine Drug Testing in Comparison to Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Techniques after Urine Precipitation or Dried Urine Spot Workup. Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 89, 11779-11786, doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03398 (2017).
17 Yan, C. et al. Real-Time Screening of Biocatalysts in Live Bacterial Colonies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1408-1411, doi:10.1021/jacs.6b12165 (2017).
18 Myung, S. et al. Coupling Desorption Electrospray Ionization with Ion Mobility/Mass Spectrometry for Analysis of Protein Structure: Evidence for Desorption of Folded and Denatured States. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 5045-5051, doi:10.1021/jp052663e (2006).
19 Jackson, A. T. et al. Microstructural and conformational studies of polyether copolymers. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 238, 287-297, doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2004.09.025 (2004).
20 Manicke, N. E. & Belford, M. Separation of Opiate Isomers Using Electrospray Ionization and Paper Spray Coupled to High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 26, 701-705, doi:10.1007/s13361-015-1096-z (2015).
21 Leaptrot, K. L., May, J. C., Dodds, J. N. & McLean, J. A. Ion mobility conformational lipid atlas for high confidence lipidomics. Nat. Commun. 10, 1-9, doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08897-5 (2019).
22 Wishart, D. S. et al. HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D608-D617, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1089 (2018).
23 Fahy, E. et al. Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J Lipid Res 50 Suppl, S9-S14, doi:10.1194/jlr.R800095-JLR200 (2009).
Kaneez Jafri1, Joy Milne1, Monty Silverdale2, and Perdita Barran*1
1Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, the University of Manchester, Princess Street, Manchester, UK, M1 7DN.
2Department of Neurology, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
Centre ID
Centre Name PI
01 Royal Bournemouth General Hospital Mary Smolen
02 Southern Health Foundation Trust Matthew Young
03 South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sarah Morris
04 Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Monty Silverdale
05 Nottingham University Hospitals Gillain Sare
06 Western General, Edinburgh Gordon Duncan
07 Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust Deborah Dellafera
08 Cambridge University Hospital Rachel Ahmed
09 Sheffield Rosie Clegg
10 Bury Judith Brooke
11 Royal Cornwall Hospitals Ali James
12 Salisbury Alpha Anthony
13 London Cheryl Pavel
14 London
15 Luton & Dunstable Yvynne Croucher
16 Portsmouth Catherine Edwards
17 Bath Elizabeth Whelan
18 North Tyneside/Northumbria Steve Dodds
19 MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Edinburgh
Tilo Kunath
20 Seb Derm, Edinburgh Richard Walker
21 Amsterdam, NL Anouk Rijs
22 JDR, Manchester Dani Mounfield
23 Plymouth Catherine Pitman/Sandra Morgan
24 Sunderland Anita Rutkauskaite
25 Devon Rob James
26 Gateshead Bryony Storey
27 Newcastle upon Tyne Alison Sutherland
28 Imperial College Ruby Colley
Table S1. Details of the collecting sites in the UK and the lead PI at each site.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0.0
4.0x107
8.0x107
0.0
4.0x107
8.0x107
500 1000 1500 2000
0.0
4.0x106
8.0x106
0.0
4.0x106
8.0x106
TIC Average mass spectrum
Whatman 42
Whatman 1
Inte
nsi
ty
Time (min) m/z
A C
B D
Figure S1. A-B) Total ion chromatogram of TM using PSI MS from Whatman 42 and Whatman 1, respectively. C-D) Corresponding average mass spectra. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) and the mass spectra acquired using each filter paper were visually similar, although reproducibility was higher with the Whatman grade 42 paper.
0.00E+00
1.00E-01
2.00E-01
3.00E-01
4.00E-01
5.00E-01
6.00E-01
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Whatman 1
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Whatman 42
Figure S2. Reproducibility test using a set of 10 samples (L-glutamine under identical conditions), from Whatman 1 and 42.
0 500 1000 1500 2000
0 500 1000 1500 2000
PSI MS of sebum from
touch and roll transfer
PSI MS of sebum from
quick extraction in EtOH
m/z
Nor
mal
ized
inte
nsity
A
B
Figure S3. Mass spectra collected from sebum using A) touch and roll transfer and B) quick extraction
in 100% EtOH, indicating the presence of higher mass molecules (in between m/z 1200-2000) in case