1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date 3G RANOP 1 Module 5 –Inter System Handover (ISHO) Optimisation
Jan 01, 2016
1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
3G RANOP 1 Module 5 –Inter System Handover (ISHO) Optimisation
2 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Module 6 – Inter System Handover Optimisation
Objectives
• Review the 3G <> 2G Cell re-selection process and
parameters
• Understand the key areas of optimisation for 3G <> 2G
Cell re-selection process
• Review the Handover Process & Compressed Mode
• Understand 3G ISHO Service Optimisation (AMR and PS
Data)
3 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Optimisation - Agenda
• 3G <> 2G Cell Re-selection Process
• 3G <> 2G Cell Re-selection Analysis
• Handover Process & Compressed Mode
• 3G ISHO Analysis
• 3G ISHO Service Optimisation
4 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Optimisation Process- Goals
• Optimum Cell Re-selection and ISHO performance should satisfy the following
requirements;
• Optimum setting of trigger thresholds to;
• Ensure 3G<>2G transitions are triggered at the correct time to prevent call set
failures and call drops due to 3G coverage/interference
• Avoid unnecessary transitions and minimising associated signalling load
• Satisfy traffic management strategy (i.e maximise ‘Time on 3G’ if required)
• Ensure selection of good 2G GSM target cell in terms of radio conditions (best cell)
• Minimise time delays involved in the 3G<>2G reselection and ISHO processes
• Maximise end user experience
• Achieving optimum performance requires;
• Detailed understanding of the processes and associated parameters
• Field investigation analysis to benchmark current performance
• Trials to investigate potential changes to optimise performance
• Optimum 3G<>2G neighbour plan
5 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Cell Reselection 3G -> 2G Procedure
• Whilst camping in a 3G cell the UE performs intra-frequency, inter-frequency, and inter-
system measurements based on the measured CPICH EcNo of the serving cell according
to the following rules:
• Serving cell parameters Sintrasearch (12dB), Sintersearch (2dB) and SsearchRAT (4dB) are
compared with Squal (CPICH Ec/No – Qqualmin (-18dB)) in S-criteria for cell re-
selection
• UE will measure neighbour cells depending on how parameters are set (if parameters
are not sent UE shall measure all cells)
• 1 - None (Squal > Sintrasearch )
• 2 - WCDMA intra-frequency (Sintersearch < Squal Sintrasearch)
• 3 - WCDMA intra- and inter- frequency, no inter-RAT cells (SsearchRAT < Squal
Sintersearch)
• 4 - WCDMA intra- and inter-frequency and inter-RAT cells (Squal SsearchRAT ) Sintrasearch Sintersearch SsearchRA
T
WCDMA CELL
1 2 3 4
In T-Mobile UK network UE starts
measuring 2G cells when Ec/Io ≤ -
14dB
6 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Cell Reselection 3G -> 2G Procedure
First ranking of all the cells based on CPICH RSCP (WCDMA) and RSSI (GSM)
Rs = CPICH RSCP + Qhyst1(4dB)
Rn= Rxlev(n) - Qoffset1(14dB)
Rn (GSM) > Rs (WCDMA) And
Rxlev (GSM) >QrxlevMin (-111dBm)
Yes No
Cell re-selection to GSM
Neighbour WCDMA or GSM cell calculation with offset
parameter
Serving WCDMA cell calculation, with
hysteresis parameter
UE starts GSM measurements if CPICH Ec/No < qQualMin + sSearchRAT
SintraSearch
SinterSearch
SsearchRAT
CPICH EcNo
qQualMin
Second ranking (R criteria) only for WCDMA cells based on CPICH Ec/No
Rs = CPICH Ec/No + Qhyst2
Rn=CPICH_Ec/No(n)-Qoffset2 Cell re-selection to WCDMA cell of highest
R value
7 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Cell Reselection 3G -> 2G
• Optimum setting of 3G>2G cell reselection triggers depends on:
• Designed utilisation targets for the 3G network (Time on 3G)
• Desired Call Set-up Success Rate (CSSR)
• Minimising the possibility of ping – pong
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
> -4 -4 to -
6
-6 to -
8
-8 to -
10
-10 to
-12
-12 to
-14
-14 to
-16
-16 to
-18
-18 to
-21
<-21
Ec/No [dB]
[%]
Call Setup status statistics for each Ec/No range
• As long as the Ec/No is >-12…-14dB the CSSR is excellent
qQualMin + sSearchRAT ~ -14dB
• To define optimum re-selection thresholds it is important to understand Ec/Io and RSCP performance profiles for T-Mobile UK network
• Bin sizes important
8 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Cell Reselection 3G -> 2G
Dense Urban Area
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
> -60 -60 to -
70
-70 to -
80
-80 to -
90
-90 to -
100
-100 to -
112
-112 to -
115
< -115
Ec/No [dB]
[%]
Call Setup status statistics for each RSCP range
In urban area the mapping has been found as: -14dB Ec/No -> ~-102dBm RSCP
9 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Due to very different fading conditions, it may be necessary to consider different
parameter sets for 3G -> 2G reselection in different scenarios;
• 3G border
• Outdoor, typical outdoor to dedicated indoor (in case of missing 3G indoor)
• Special indoor cases without dedicated 3G where the UE speed is high (e.g.
tunnels)
• For example in 3G border
coverage environment the
EcNo level can be seen to
drop much faster
compared to RSCP
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
14:1
4:5
2.8
67
14:1
5:2
0.0
97
14:1
5:5
5.0
97
14:1
6:3
0.0
97
14:1
7:0
5.0
98
14:1
7:4
1.0
99
14:1
8:1
6.0
90
14:1
8:5
2.0
91
14:1
9:2
8.0
93
Time
Ec/N
o (
dB
)
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
RS
CP
(d
Bm
)
Cell Reselection 3G -> 2G
10 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Cell Reselection 2G -> 3G
Check levels every 5s from serving GSM cell
and best 6 GSM neighbour cells
UE starts WCDMA measurements if Rxlev running average (RLA_C) is below or above
certain threshold: RLA_C Qsearch_I and Qsearch_P (GPRS)
UE can select WCDMA cell if the level of the serving GSM and non-serving GSM cells has been
exceeded by certain offset for a period of 5 s: CPICH RSCP > RLA_C + FDD_Cell_Reselect_Offset
UE will re-select WCDMA cell in case it's quality is acceptable:
CPICH Ec/No Minimum_FDD_Threshold
Compare levels of all GSM cells
to WCDMA neighbour
Check quality of neighbour
WCDMA cells, no priorities between
WCDMA neighbours 0
5.0
8:T
his
ma
y t
ake
up
to 3
0s
11 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Re-selection measurements are controlled by parameter threshold to search WCDMA
RAN cells (QSRI)
• This parameter defines a threshold and also indicates whether these measurements are performed when RLA_C (a running average of received signal level) of the
serving GSM cell is below or above the threshold
• In GSM the UE is usually set to measure the 3G neighbours all the time i.e. Qsearch_I and Qsearch_P are both set to 7
Cell Reselection 2G -> 3G
UE starts WCDMA measurements if Rxlev running average (RLA_C) is below or above
certain threshold: RLA_C Qsearch_I and Qsearch_P (GPRS)
12 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• For the the camping in indoor environment the set-up could be :
• Indoor GSM / Outdoor GSM (serving indoor)-> Indoor WCDMA / Outdoor
WCDMA (serving indoor)
• Mobile station measuring WCDMA neighbor only when it is well inside the
building using parameter Threshold to search WCDMA RAN Cells
• The defined set-up can be also used in outdoor environment to push the UEs to
3G as soon as possible from the 2G cell to the border 3G cell
Cell Reselection 2G -> 3G
13 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• As a general rule the value for FDD_Qmin parameter can be set to –11…-12 dB
(i.e. for the case where the QqualMin +Ssearch_RAT = -14dB)
How to avoid ping-pong ?
UE will re-select WCDMA cell in case it's quality is acceptable:
CPICH Ec/No Minimum_FDD_Threshold
• The “rule” to set the FDD_Qmin value has not been possible to be fulfilled until the specification change (05.08 v8.18.0, 2003-8) has been implemented to the UEs – as below
QqualMin = -18dB
QqualMin + Ssearch_RAT = -14dB
FDD_Qmin >=-12
Camping in 3G Camping in 2G Camping in 3G
CPICH Ec/No
t
FDD_Qmin >= QqualMin + Ssearch_RAT
Fdd_Qmin mapping
Aif parameter 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Fdd_Qmin (old) [dB] -20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13
Fdd_Qmin (new) [dB] -20 -6 -18 -8 -16 -10 -14 -12
14 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Optimisation - Agenda
• 3G <> 2G Cell Re-selection
• 3G<>2G Neighbour Plan Design Guidelines
• Handover Process & Compressed Mode
• 3G ISHO Analysis
• 3G ISHO Service Optimisation (AMR and PS Data)
15 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Inter-System Neighbours – Design Guidelines
• Principles for 3G2G neighbour relations
• Neighbouring plan should be kept as simple as possible
• The best neighbours at each point of the 3G coverage border should be in
the list of adjacencies.
• If a 2G layer has a strong interference situation (tight frequency re-use),
layers with less interference could be preferred
• If a 2G layer has high blocking probability, layers with less traffic could be
preferred
• Avoid 2G neighbour lists containing multiple instances of the same RF carrier
• Ensure 2G neighbour plan maximises reuse between cells on same BCCH-
BSIC combination
• Principles for 2G3G neighbour relations
• The overlapping 3G cell should be in the list of adjacencies of all underlying
2G cells
• If the list of overlapping cells includes more than 32 GSM cells, it has to be
shortened
• One solution is to restrict neighbour list to ONE GSM band
16 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Multiple Instances of same RF Carrier in 2G Neighbour
List • Dropped in 3G PS ISHO.
• 9 Compressed Mode Activated, but no HO Command.
• During each phase of CM, RNC selects BCCH1 (2 GSM cells in ncell list BCCH1
BSIC29 & BCCH1 BSIC5) and asks UE to verify BSIC, but never receives MR
with the BSIC reported.
1f SC332 EcNo=-13dB, RSCP=-113dBm.
MC to verified the BSIC.
2G Coverage
17 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
3G-2G Adjacencies – Design Guidelines
3G
2G
3G
2G
2G 3G
Co-Azimuthed: N3G = N2G + Cell2G
Co-Sited, Not Co-Azimuthed: N3G = N2GCell1 п N2GCell2 + Cell12G + Cell22G
Not Co-Sited, Not Co-Aziluthed: Manual Design
18 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• 2G->3G: Max # of IS Neighbours per 2G cell (ADJW):
• Max number of 3G neighbours= 32
• However in Nokia implementation to allow the SI2 message in only one BCCH block the 3G neighbours list size should be limited to 10 neighbours.
• 3G->2G: Max # of IS Neighbours per 3G cell (ADJG):
• Max number of 2G neighbours= 32
• Minimize the number of 2G neighbours to improve the performances Nokia suggest to limit the number of 2G neighbours to 16 when possible
• If too many adjacencies are declared the cell will go blocked by system with alarm:
• 7761 RNW O/M SCENARIO FAILURE (BCCH scheduling error) in RN1.5.2ED2
• 7771 WCDMA CELL OUT OF USE (BCCH scheduling error) in RN2.0
• Nokia RNC software Technical Note 46 specifies Restriction on number of cells in
SIB11/12 message for 47 neighboring cells (worst case)
• On one hand the SIB type 11 and 12 messages can contain information on the
maximum of 96 cells (32 intra-frequency cells, 32 inter-frequency cells and 32 GSM
cells), but on the other hand the physical size of SIB data (no more than 3552 bits) has capacity only for 47 neighboring cells.
Inter-System Neighbours – Design Guidelines
19 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Optimisation - Agenda
• 3G <> 2G Cell Re-selection
• Neighbour planning
• Handover Process & Compressed Mode
• 3G ISHO Analysis
• 3G ISHO Service Optimisation (AMR and PS Data)
20 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Handover Triggering Thresholds set in RNC
Event Triggered Coverage/Capacity based HO fulfilled in RNC
RNC commands the UE to start IS measurements periodically
Measurements are done in Compressed Mode (CM)
UE reports best GSM cells having strongest RSSI results back to RNC
RNC makes HO decision and commands UE to target cell
RSSI measurements and verification for GSM cells
Inter System Handover 3G -> 2G Procedure
• Currently ISHO measurements can be triggered for 5 different reasons
• To measure GSM frequencies, 3G UE needs (a) dual receiver or (b) Compressed Mode capability
• Most UEs currently use CM to ‘create’ gap during which BCCH frequencies on the 2G network can be measured
• CM introduces a delay which depends on the measurement reason and pattern used
• Two types of CM measurements; GSM RSSI & GSM BSIC verification
• Methods for implementing CM are (i) High Layer Scheduling (HLS), (ii) Spreading Factor Halving (SF/2) and (iii) Puncturing
• Handover decision driven by RNC using measurements made by UE
• Compressed Mode affects 3G coverage, capacity and quality
!
21 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Downlink DPCH power UL Quality
deterioration UE Tx power CPICH RSCP CPICH Ec/I0
RAN Internal measurements Configured UE measurements
Initiate Compressed Mode Configure GSM measurements
GSM cell meets HO condition ?
Initiate Handover
Initiate Compressed Mode Configure GSM measurements
UE Reports GSM BSIC measurements
UE Reports GSM RSSI measurements
No
Yes
Is BSCI verification required for PS call ?
No
Yes
Inter System Handover 3G -> 2G Procedure
22 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• BSIC verification always performed for AMR calls – no interrupt in voice call
CN UE Node B
RNC
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
NBAP: Radio Link Reconfiguration Prepare
NBAP: Radio Link Reconfiguration Ready
NBAP: Radio Link Reconfiguration Commit
RRC: Physical Channel Reconfiguration
RRC: Physical Channel Reconfiguration Complete
NBAP: Compressed Mode Command
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
NBAP: Compressed Mode Command
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
RRC: Handover from UTRAN Command
GSM BSIC Identification
GSM RSSI Measurement
ISHO triggering (5 reasons are possible)
Initial Compressed Mode Configuration
RANAP: Relocation Required
RANAP: Relocation Command
RANAP: IU Release Command
RANAP: IU Release Complete
ISHO 3G -> 2G - AMR Signalling Flow
23 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• In most cases BSIC verification is not required (data interrupt as UE moves to 2G)
• PS makes use of RRC: CELL CHANGE ORDER FROM UTRAN message
UE
Node B
RNC
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
NBAP: Radio Link Reconf iguration Prepare
NBAP: Radio Link Reconf iguration Ready
NBAP: Radio Link Reconf iguration Commit
RRC: Physical Channel Reconf iguration
RRC: Physical Channel Reconf iguration Complete
NBAP: Compressed Mode Command
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control GSM RSSI Measurement
ISHO triggering (5 reasons are possible)
Initial Compressed Mode Configuration
CN
RANAP: SRNS Context Request
RANAP: SRNS Context Response
RANAP: IU Release Command
RANAP: IU Release Complete
RRC: Cell Change Order f rom UTRAN
RANAP: SRNS Data Forward Command
ISHO 3G -> 2G - PS Signalling Flow
24 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Compressed Mode
Procedure
• RNC informs UE of CM pattern and 2G neighbour list in RRC:
Measurement Control message
• 3GPP states that the UE must be capable of recording a
minimum number of GSM RSSI measurement samples per
transmission gap
• GSM RSSI measurements are made without acquiring GSM
synchronisation
• UE reports on strongest 6 GSM neighbours at periodic
interval defined by GSMMeasRepInterval
• RNC applies a sliding averaging window to the
measurements provided by the UE
• RNC instructs UE to perform BSIC verification (AMR=always,
PS=as required) using new CM pattern
• BSIC verification needs synchronisation to GSM frame
RNC commands the selected UEs to enter compressed mode and provides compressed mode parameters and neighbour list
During the DL reception gap UE
can make measurements from 2G network
UE measures RSSI of GSM
neighbours and reports these to RNC periodically
RNC makes HO decision
RNC commands UE to decode BSIC of cell with strongest RSSI
RNC sends handover command to UE
WCDMA
IS-HO trigger Target Cell found IS-HO command
RSSI measurements
BSIC verification
TRSSI TBSIC
25 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Compressed Mode Method
• Single frame approach (used in
spreading factor halving and HLS
½ data rate)
• Double frame approach (used in
puncturing and HLS ¾ data rate)
CM Method SF/2
AMR Speech RT Data
SF/2
NRT Data
½ or ¾ Rate HLS
• Compressed mode Methods used in Nokia
!
26 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
CMmasterSwitch RNC
Scope Configurable
Yes
Nokia Range
0 (false), 1 (true)
WCEL Yes 0 to 255
WCEL Yes
WCEL Yes
WCEL Yes
MaxNumbUECMcoverHO
PrxTarget
PrxOffset
PtxTarget
PtxOffset WCEL Yes
Default/T-Mobile UK
1
0 to 30 dB
0 to 6 dB
-10 to 50 dBm
0 to 6 dB
16
4 dB
1 dB
40 dBm
1 dB
• Compressed mode can be enabled/disabled on a per RNC basis using CMmasterSwitch
parameter
• The maximum number of UE allowed to be in compressed mode simultaneously can be limited using the MaxNumbUECMcoverHO parameter
• PrxTarget, PrxOffset, PtxTarget and PtxOffset are also used when making the decision
whether or not a UE is allowed to apply compressed mode
• If the cell exceeds Prx/txTarget then one more UE may apply compressed mode during
that radio resource indication period
• If the cell exceeds Prx/txTarget + Prx/txOffset then no more UE may apply compressed
mode during that radio resource indication period
Other Relevant CM Parameters
27 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• 3G <> 2G Cell Re-selection
• Handover Process & Compressed Mode
• 3G<>2G neighbour Plan Verification
• 3G ISHO Analysis
• 3G ISHO Service Optimisation (AMR and PS Data)
ISHO Optimisation - Agenda
28 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• 3G ISHO performance should be analysed from;
• Drive Test Data
• Network Statistics
to obtain an overall picture of ISHO performance
3G ISHO Analysis Overview
29 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Drive Test Analysis should deliver ISHO performance metrics
such as;
• Number of ISHO attempts
• ISHO & Compressed Mode Success Rate
• Trigger reasons
• Failure Causes
• ISHO Times and Interrupt Delays
• Number of CM cycles needed
ISHO Analysis from Drive Test
Data
30 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Analysis from Drive Test
Data
Need to analyse each ISHO
attempt to determine;
• Whether it was a necessary ISHO
• What the trigger mechanism was
(helps determine whether trigger
thresholds are set correctly)
• Whether the ISHO was successful
and if not the failure cause (e.g. No
cell found, UE failed BSIC
verification, UE didn’t receive
HandoverFromUTRANCommand)
• ISHO Success Rates
• Process needs to be automated
within the drive test post-
processing tool(s)
31 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
PS ISHO Failure Analysis - Example
33%
33%
7%
7%
7%
13%
Network does not isse 'Cell Change Order'
UE responds to 'Cell Change Order' with a 'Failure'
UE does not react to the 'Cell Change Order'
UE does not report any GSM RSSI measurements
UE does not receive the CM 'Measurement Control'
UE fails BSIC verification
• Generating an ISHO Failure Breakdown enables areas for further
optimisation to be identified
• May require further troubleshooting with data logging, RNC counters etc. to
determine root cause of failure
• Analysis should be performed for each service (i.e. AMR, PS etc.)
32 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
0%
22%
0%
56%
22%
UE does not read any 2G sys info
UE reads 2G sys info but does not send RACH (no cell re-
sel)
UE reads 2G sys info and sends RACH but does not est.
connection (no cell re-sel)
UE reads 2G sys info and completes 2G cell re-sel but
does not send RACH
UE reads 2G sys info and completes 2G cell re-sel and
sends RACH but does not est. connection
• 78 % of the failures occur after the UE has completed a 2G cell re-selection.
100 % of these 2G cell re-selections was onto a 2G cell which was not in the
3G system neighbour list
• The 2G neighbour lists thus appear to have missing neighbours which
subsequently result in a 2G cell re-selection and a slowing down of the inter-
system handover procedure
• This failure scenario could be used to refine the 3G system inter-RAT
neighbour lists during the post processing and analysis of any drive test data
Example PS ISHO Failure Analysis
33 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
GsmMaxMeasPeriod x GsmMeasRepInterval = 12s
ISHO Failure - No Cell Found Failure Example
Tstart = 17:22:41.7
Tstop = 17:22:53.7 MW = 12 s
Compressed Mode started
Compressed Mode stopped
34 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
RxLev = -110 + 4 = -106 dBm
4
AdjgRxLevMinHO = -104 dBm
POOR GSM
COVERAGE
No suitable cell
ISHO Failure - No Cell Found Failure Example
35 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Failure - UE receives
iuv_relocation_prep_fail
• GSM BSIC verification is achieved and
RNC sends iuv_relocation_required
message with the target CI, LAC but
receives an iuv_relocation_prep_fail
message back from the CN
• Failure due to data build error in 2G MSC
• In this failure case no
HandoverFromUTRANcommand is
observed
36 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Analysing ISHO Delay
• ISHO delay ultimately impacts overall ISHO performance > longer the delay,
greater chance of ISHO failing
• Performance impact greater on PS calls (throughput reduction)
• ISHO delay is affected by;
• RNC databuild – 2G neighbour lists provided to UE must be optimum.
The longer the list the longer it takes UE to complete RSSI
measurements
• Radio Plan - Areas of excessive interference will hinder UE’s ability to
decode BSIC and registration procedure
• System design - Implementation of Gs interface enables faster
‘combined’ LAU/RAU registration procedure, rate of broadcasting
system information messages, e.g. SI13
WCDMA
IS-HO trigger Target Cell found IS-HO command
RSSI measurements
BSIC verification
TRSSI TBSIC
37 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO delay, AMR
Ta= activation time
Trssi= RSSI delay time. By default, the network only requires the first RSSI measurements to choose the best GSM target cell. TBSIC= Time for UE to decode the BSIC of the
chosen cell
11.3
2.0
0.2
4.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
Ta
Trssi
Tbsic
Thandover
Total delay
• Measurements taken from Nokia
test network (predominantly
suburban environment) – averaged
over a large number of calls
• BSIC verification process has the
greatest impact on AMR CM delay
• Little scope for reducing this delay
as BSIC verification always required
– but delay in AMR of less
importance as there is no service
gap to user with AMR calls during CM
Thandover
RNC
RRC: Measurement Control (IE tgmp=GSM RSSI)
RRC: Measurement Report
. .
UE
ISHO triggered: Event 6A/1F/
RRC: Measurement Control (IE tgmp=GSM BSIC)
Handover from UTRAN
. .
. RRC: Measurement report : BSIC decoded
RRC: Measurement report: BSIC no decoded
Ta
Trssi
TBSIC
Total Delay
38 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Ta= activation time
Trssi= RSSI delay time. By default, the network only requires the first RSSI measurements to choose the best GSM target cell.
1.41.2
2.6
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
seco
nd
s
Tactivation
Trssi
Total
ISHO delay, PS
• PS ISHO introduces service affecting
data interrupt (i.e. throughput reduction)
• In most cases PS calls do not require BSIC verification during ISHO process
• BSIC verification required when 2G
neighbour list contains multiple cells on same frequency as the ‘best’ RF carrier
chosen by the RNC
• Need to avoid the need for BSIC verification where ever possible
RRC: Measurement control (IE TGMP=”GSM RSSI”)
RRC: Measurement report
ISHO triggered: Event 6A/1F/
RRC: Cell change Order from UTRAN
Ta
Trssi
RNC UE
39 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Impact of 2G Neighbour List Length
on TRSSI
• UE measures all GSM carriers indicated in the Measurement Control message prior to
sending Measurement Report to RNC
• If UE is not able to measure all GSM carriers within the measurement period it sends an ‘empty’ Measurement Report
• Once UE has measured all 2G carriers (L1) it reports these measurements to L3 which
reports the top 6 strongest to RNC in Measurement Report
• In general GSM RSSI measurement delay increases as the length of the 2G neighbour
list increases. There is however quite a large scatter
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Delay to the first GSM RSSI Measurement (seconds)
Nu
mb
er
of
GS
M N
eig
hb
ou
rs
• Tests made with Nokia 7600 UE
• The general trend is that the GSM
RSSI measurement delay increases as the length of the 2G neighbour list
increases. There is however quite a
large scatter
40 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Throughput will be affected by;
• method of CM used (e.g. HLS)
• poor coverage requiring additional re-transmisisons
• Once UE has been instructed to move to 2G throughput drops to zero until UE
has registered (LAU and RAU) on the 2G network
Average = 121 kbps HLS starts
Th
rou
gh
pu
t
Time
Average = 71 kbps
• Example measurements from the
HLS method applied to the PS data
service
• 7 slot transmission gap
• Single frame approach
• 4 frame transmission gap pattern
length
• Throughput reductions
• 64 kbps service: 55 to 15 kbps
• 128 kbps service: 121 to 71 kbps
CM Throughput Reduction – HLS
Example
41 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Analysis from Network
Statistics
• ISHO counters are found in the Inter-system hard handover measurement table
(M1010Cxx)
• The inter-system handover measurement is carried out in the serving RNC
(SRNC)
• The object of the measurement is the source cell from which the handover is
attempted.
• In case of multiple cells in the AS the object of the measurement is the best cell
of the Active Set during the handover decision (except for
IS_COM_MOD_STA_NOT_POS_(N)RT) where the object is the best active
set cell during the compressed mode preparation phase
• From the measurement point of view the ISHO is divided into two phases:
• Inter-system measurement
• Inter-system handover
• Separate counters for RT and NRT services
42 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Counters for Triggering
Reasons
RNC
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
If compressed mode can NOT start (before sending Measurement Control to UE) the following counter is incremented:
IS_COM_MOD_STA_NOT_POS_(N)RT
The counter is updated when:
- Admission Control rejects compressed mode request
- Compressed mode can not start due to radio link (or physical channel) reconfiguration failure (BTS or UE reasons)
- ISHO is a parallel procedure (especially NRT)
If compressed mode can start the following counters are incremented:
IS_HHO_W_CMOD_UL_DCH_Q_(N)RT
IS_HHO_W_CMOD_UE_TX_PWR_(N)RT
IS_HHO_W_CMOD_DL_DPCH_(N)RT
IS_HHO_W_CMOD_CPICH_RSCP_(N)RT
IS_HHO_W_CMOD_ CPICH_ECNO_(N)RT
Compressed
Mode start
These counters are not incremented in this phase but they are
incremented After RxLev/BSIC verification phase together with the
ATTEMPT or NO CELL FOUND counters
The counters are updated in the best cell of the active set
CHECK TRAFFIC TABLE COUNTERS
ALSO COUNTERS FOR ISHO START WITHOUT COMPRESSED MODE EXIST (DUAL RECEIVER)
IS_HHO_WO_CMOD_XXX
43 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Counters for measurement procedure failure
If the RNC does not find a suitable cell, one of the following
counters are updated:
IS_HHO_NO_CELL_UL_DCH_Q_(N)RT
IS_HHO_NO_CELL_UE_TX_PWR_(N)RT
IS_HHO_NO_CELL_DL_DPCH_(N)RT
IS_HHO_NO_CELL_CPICH_RSCP_(N)RT
IS_HHO_NO_CELL_CPICH_ECNO_(N)RT
Triggered in the refernce cell when: 1) GsmMaxMeasPeriod measurement reports are received with an rx level
not suitable 2) GsmMaxMeasPeriod measurement reports are received with a BSIC not
verified
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
These counters are updated when either:
• No suitable GSM target cell is found in terms of RSSI
(RxLev)
• Target cell is suitable (RSSI) but BSIC verification fails
And;
Maximum number of measurement reports have been
received
44 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Compressed Mode Stopped – Case 1
-Stop RxLev measurement -Start BSIC verification phase
-Stop BSIC verification phase (GsmMaxMeasPeriod msg with measurementIdentity = 3 received before the max_meas_interval time window expires)
RNC does receive GsmMaxMeasPeriod ISHO Measurement Reports (meas id = 3) before the above max_meas_interval time window expires.
-GsmMaxMeasPeriod = 12 -GsmMeasRepInterval = 0.5s -max_meas_interval = (12+4)/2 = 8s
13 Measurement Reports: -12 with measurementIdentity = 3 -1 with measurementIdentity =5 (1f -EcNo)
meas_interval < 8 s
IS_HHO_W_CMOD_DL_DPCH_RT = +1 IS_HHO_NO_CELL_DL_DPCH_RT = +1
45 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Counters for ISHO Attempt for RT
If the RNC has found a suitable cell (both RxLev
and BSIC phases), one of the following counters
are updated:
IS_HHO_ATT_UL_DCH_Q_RT
IS_HHO_ATT_UE_TX_PWR_RT
IS_HHO_ATT_DL_DPCH_PWR_RT
IS_HHO_ATT_CPICH_RSCP_RT
IS_HHO_ATT_CPICH_ECNO_RT
The counters are triggered when the RNC sends
the RANAP: RELOCATION REQUIRED
message to the MSC
Only the SRNC can update the counters.
HHO Attempt
Counters
The counters are updated in the best cell of the active set
RELOCATION REQUIRED
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
MSC X
RxLev meas.
BSIC verif.
46 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Counters for ISHO Attempt for NRT
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
If the RNC has found a suitable cell (most
likely only RxLev), one of the following
counters are updated:
IS_HHO_ATT_UL_DCH_Q_NRT
IS_HHO_ATT_UE_TX_PWR_NRT
IS_HHO_ATT_DL_DPCH_PWR_NRT
IS_HHO_ATT_CPICH_RSCP_NRT
IS_HHO_ATT_CPICH_ECNO_NRT
The counters are triggered when the RNC
sends the RRC: CELL CHANGE ORDER
FROM UTRAN message to the UE.
Only the SRNC can update the counters.
HHO Attempt
Counters
The counters are updated in the best cell of the active set
CELL CHANGE ORDER X
RxLev meas.
BSIC verification only in case 2 ADJG
with same BCCH
47 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
KPI for ISHO measurement procedure
AllcausesAllcauses
Allcauses
RTNxxxCMODWOHHOISRTNxxxCMODWHHOIS
RTNxxxCELLNOHHOIS
RateFailMeasISHO)_(____)_(____
)_(____
___
Compressed
Mode start
No Cell Found
Counters
HHO Attempt
Counters
NO counters
triggering
It’s not possible to distinguish between failures in the RxLev measurement or in the BSIC
verification
It’s not possible to monitor cases like: 1) the UE does not send some measurement reports 2) Drop during measurement 3) parallel procedure (e.g capacity request for NRT)
Max measurement interval not expiring
CM measurement is not interrupted
… measurement fail
… measurement not fail
Accuracy in GSM neighbour planning
Max measurement interval expiring OR
CM measurement is interrupted
KPI is useful for cell level
48 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Call Duration and ISHO procedure triggered
• Monitoring how often ISHO procedure is started ISHO Triggering threshold tuning
• The KPI on cell level does not take into account user mobility. It does make sense on
cluster/RNC level only
• The KPI can help operators in understanding the ISHO strategy
• Same KPI for NRT
(AVG_DCH_HLD_TM_PS_INTER+AVG_DCH_HLD_TM_PS_BACKG at numerator)
• Service level counter at denominator shall be used because allocation duration
counters (Traffic table) incremented in all the cells within Active Set
• Accuracy of the Indicator affected by:
• the number of ISHO procedures which have no ISHO counter incremented (e.g. drop during
CM, see previous slide)
• number of not successful ISHO procedures during the same call due to e.g. wrong ADJ
parameter, rough mobiles etc.
withoutCMwithAllcauses
OS_RT_STA_NOT_PIS_COM_MODD_RTIS_HHO_CMO
ICE/D_TM_CS_VOAVG_RAB_HLcedure_RTr_ISHO_proMinutes_pe
&,
6000
KPI is useful for cluster level and cell level as well
49 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Attempt UTRAN Failure RT
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Handover Command
When the UTRAN is not able to execute an Inter-System Handover the following counter is triggered:
UTRAN_NOT_ABLE_EXC_ISHHO_RT The counter is triggered when the ISHO fails before the
SRNC sends the handover command to the UE, in the same cell where the ISHO attempt has been updated:
• Relocation Preparation Failure or • TRelocPrep (def. 6s, from Relocation Required to
Relocation Command) expires.
The failure can take place for the following reasons:
• Radio Resource congestion in the target cell • Radio Link setup/addition failure in the BTS (IFHO) • Failure during the Relocation preparation procedure in
the CN (for example ciphering parameter not set properly in 3G MSC, LAC mismatching in RNC/MSC)
• Failure during the Relocation resource allocation procedure in the target BSC
UTRAN Failure
Counter
Relocation Procedure
50 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
KPI for ISHO Triggering Reasons
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
It’s important to know which is the most frequent triggering reason:
It’s possible to diffentiate between quality and coverage reasons
Understand the network limiting factors:
• CPICH coverage
• Pilot pollution
• UL/DL Service coverage
The triggerning reasons must be enabled: GSMcause…
Allcauses
RTNxxxCMODWHHOIS
RTNxxxCMODWHHOISpercCausexxx
)_(____
)_(______
KPI is useful for cluster level and cell level as well
51 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO UE Failure RT and NRT
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
HANDOVER FROM UTRAN
When the UE is not able to execute an Inter-System Handover the following counter is triggered: UE_NOT_ABLE_EXC_ISHHO_(N)RT The counter is triggered when the source RNC receives a failure message from the mobile with the failure cause “configuration unacceptable”. The counter is triggered in the same cell where the ISHO attempt has been updated.
UE Failure
Counter
CELL CHANGE ORDER FROM UTRAN
x
HANDOVER FROM UTRAN FAILURE
CELL CHANGE ORDER FROM UTRAN FAILURE
52 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Unsuccessful ISHO RT and NRT
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Handover Command
When the RNC receives a failure message from the mobile and the cause is not “configuration unacceptable”, one of the following counter is triggered: UNSUCC_IS_HHO_UL_DCH_Q_(N)RT UNSUCC_IS_HHO_EU_TX_PWR_(N)RT UNSUCC_IS_HHO_DL_DPCH_PWR_(N)RT UNSUCC_IS_HHO_CPICH_RSCP_(N)RT UNSUCC_IS_HHO_CPICH_ECNO_(N)RT The counter is triggered in the same cell where the ISHO attempt has been updated. Reason for failure:
• Physical channel failure (the UE is not able to establish – in the target RAT – the phy. Channel indicated in the handover command)
• Protocol error • Inter-Rat protocol error • Unspecified
Handover Failure Cell Change Failure
ISHO Unsuccess
Counters
Cell Change Order (PS)
x
53 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Successful ISHO
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Handover Command
When the source RNC receives the RANAP message “IU RELEASE COMMAND” from the core network, one of the following counter is triggered: SUCC_IS_HHO_UL_DCH_Q_(N)RT SUCC_IS_HHO_EU_TX_PWR_(N)RT SUCC_IS_HHO_DL_DPCH_PWR_(N)RT SUCC_IS_HHO_CPICH_RSCP_(N)RT SUCC_IS_HHO_CPICH_ECNO_(N)RT The counter is triggered in the same cell where the ISHO attempt has been updated. During testing the counter is updated in case of failures (RAB Active failure for RNC internal): for RT use RAB release due to SRNC relocation (relocation not used at the moment)
Handover Complete to BSC
ISHO Success
Counters
IU Release Command
CN
Cell Change Order (PS)
54 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
RRC Drop during ISHO RT
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Handover Command
When the source RCC Connection drops during the ISHO, one of the following counter is triggered: CON_DRPS_IS_HHO_UL_DCH_Q_RT CON_DRPS_IS_HHO_EU_TX_PWR_RT CON_DRPS _IS _HHO_DL_DPCH_PWR_RT CON_DRPS _IS _HHO_CPICH_RSCP_RT CON_DRPS _IS _HHO_CPICH_ECNO_RT For RT: TRelocOverall (def. 8s, from Relocation Command to Iu Release Command) expires.
RRC Drop
Counters IU Release Request
CN
55 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
RRC Drop during ISHO NRT
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
When the source RCC Connection drops during the ISHO, one of the following counter is triggered: CON_DRPS_IS_HHO_UL_DCH_Q_NRT CON_DRPS_IS_HHO_EU_TX_PWR_NRT CON_DRPS _IS _HHO_DL_DPCH_PWR_NRT CON_DRPS _IS _HHO_CPICH_RSCP_NRT CON_DRPS _IS _HHO_CPICH_ECNO_NRT For NRT: RRC-TmrlRCC = T309+ InterRATCellReselTmrOffset expires where: T309 parameter = 5 s (SIB1) InterRATCellReselTmrOffset is hidden parameter 3s
RRC Drop
Counters
IU Release Request CN
Cell Change Order (PS)
56 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
KPI for ISHO Failure Rate
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report” (3,4,5)
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Handover Command
Allcauses
RTxxxATTHHOIS
RTSuccessNbrRTAttOverRateFailISHO
____
__1_____
withoutCMwithAllcauses
Allcauses
OS_NRT_STA_NOT_PIS_COM_MODD_NRTIS_HHO_CMO
NRTxxxHHOISSUCC
NRTRateFailISHOOverall
&,
____
1____Cell Change Order (PS)
Nbr_Success_RT =
RAB_ACT_REL_CS_VOICE_SRNC, SRNC Reloc/IFHO off SUM(SUCC_IS_HHO_XXX_RT), SRNC Reloc/IFHO on
Allcauses
Allcauses
NRTxxxATTHHOIS
NRTxxxHHOISSUCC
NRTAttOverRateFailISHO____
____
1_____
withoutCMwithAllcauses
OS_RT_STA_NOT_PIS_COM_MODD_RTIS_HHO_CMO
RTSuccessNbrRTRateFailISHOOverall
&,
__1____
KPI are useful for cluster level and cell level as well
57 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Analysis from Network
Statistics
CN UE Node B RNC
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
NBAP: Radio Link Reconf iguration Prepare
NBAP: Radio Link Reconf iguration Ready
NBAP: Radio Link Reconf iguration Commit
RRC: Physical Channel Reconf iguration
RRC: Physical Channel Reconf iguration Complete
NBAP: Compressed Mode Command
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
NBAP: Compressed Mode Command
RRC: Measurement Report
RRC: Measurement Control
RRC: Handover f rom UTRAN Command
GSM BSIC Identification
GSM RSSI Measurement
ISHO triggering (5 reasons are possible)
Initial Compressed Mode Configuration
RANAP: Relocation Required
RANAP: Relocation Command
RANAP: IU Release Command
RANAP: IU Release Complete
58 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• ISHO success rate on Beckton3 (URKKT03) had always been poor (<80%) with
UTRAN_NOT_ABLE_EXEC_ISHO_RT the largest failure counter (>90% increments on
<6 cells)
ISHO Analysis from Network Statistics UE doesn’t receive HandoverFromUTRAN Command
• Similar pattern was observed across a
number of other RNCs
59 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
ISHO Analysis from Network Statistics UE doesn’t receive HandoverFromUTRAN Command
UTRAN_NOT_ABLE_EXEC_ISHHO_RT counter according to customer documentation
60 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
PROCEDURE IS STARTED.....
ISHO Analysis from Network Statistics UE doesn’t receive HandoverFromUTRAN Command
61 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
GSM SUITABLE CELL IS FOUND AND BSIC VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED....
1
BSIC IS CORRECTLY VERIFIED.... 2
RELOCATION IS REQUIRED TO MSC... Timer TRelocPrep (6s) is started
3
ISHO Analysis from Network Statistics UE doesn’t receive HandoverFromUTRAN Command
62 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Timer TRelocPrep (6s) expires Relocation Cancel msg is sent to MSC.....
Note that, in the meantime, no parallel procedure is allowed.....
ISHO Analysis from Network Statistics UE doesn’t receive HandoverFromUTRAN Command
63 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• 3G <> 2G Cell Re-selection
• Neighbour planning
• Handover Process & Compressed Mode
• 3G ISHO Analysis
• 3G ISHO Service Optimisation (AMR and PS Data)
ISHO Optimisation - Agenda
64 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
3. Decision Algorithm
UE Tx Power (Event 6A) •Threshold: GsmUETxPwrThrXX •L3 filter: GsmUETxPwrFilterCoeff •Hysteresis margin: GsmUETxPwrTimeHyst •Data rate threshold HHOMAxAllowedBitrateUL
UL Quality •Timer: ULQualDetRepThreshold •Data rate threshold HHOMAxAllowedBitrateUL
DL DPCH power •Threshold: GsmDLTxPwrThrXX •Data rate threshold HHOMAxAllowedBitrateDL
(XX=AMR,CS,NrtPS,RtPS)
CPICH RSCP (Event 1F) •Thresholds: HHoRscpThreshold HHoRscpCancel L3 filter: HHoRscpFilterCoefficient •Timers: HHoRscpTimeHysteresis HHoRscpCancelTime
CPICH Ec/Io (Event 1F) •Thresholds: HHoEcNoThreshold HHoEcNoCancel •L3 filter: EcNofilterCoefficient •Timers: HHoEcNoTimeHysteresis HHoEcNoCancelTime
AdjgTxPwrMaxTCH AdjgRxLevMinHO (n) GsmMeasAveWindow
GsmMeasRepInterval GsmNcellSearchPeriod GsmMinMeasInterval GsmMaxMeasPeriod
Handover Execution
2G-to-3G back prevention
GsmMinHoInterval
2. GSM measurement reporting
Inter System Handover 3G -> 2G Tuning
1. Triggering
2. GSM measuring
3. Decision
65 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Inter System Handover 3G -> 2G Tuning
The IS-HO process consists of several independent sub-processes. Therefore the optimisation can be applied to each sub-process individually:
1. Triggering process:
• Parameters that belong to this process defines the starting of the GSM measurements: filters, hysteresis, timers and thresholds
2. GSM Measurement reporting process
• Following parameters control the reporting of the GSM measurements
• GsmMinMeasInterval: Establish minimum time between successive GSM measurements
• GsmMaxMeasPeriod: Maximum duration of the GSM measurements in CM
• GsmMeasRepInterval: Reporting period of the GSM measurements during CM
3. Decision process:
• Parameters that participate in the selection of the best target cell:
• AdjgRxLevMinHO(n): Minimum RX level of the GSM cell to do handover
4. ISHO cancellation parameters:
• Cancellation parameters are built for CPICH EcNO and CPICH RSCP triggering functionality only
66 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Each triggering procedure makes use of filters, hysteresis and thresholds which
are used to control the inter-system handover behaviour
• The purpose of the hysteresis and filters is to improve the accuracy of the
measurements
• The purpose of the thresholds is to control 3G boundary of the different
services
• Each 3G cell had in average 4 GSM neighbour cells.
• By modifying the network configuration (blocking of cells etc), the radio conditions
in each route was aconditioned so that the need for an inter-system handover
was due to the triggering condition studied
• For example, when the UE Tx power trigger was studied, the radio
conditions along the routes were modified so that the uplink path was the
critical one, in this way the IS-HO performance was not affected by other
reasons e.g. poor CPICH EcNo
• During the tests the following traces were recorded:
-The coordinates where the CM starts
-Unsuccessful/successful ISHO events
ISHO Triggering Process
67 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Different CPICH EcNo thresholds were used with setting 3:
IS-HO performance at threshold values of –11 dB and –12 dB is very similar.
Routes EcNo (IS-HO Success) % IS-HO
Threshold /(Attempts) success rate
Route 2 -11 12/12 100%
-12 12/12 100%
-14 3/9 33.3%
Route 4 -11 7/9 77.7%
-12 8/9 88.8%
-14 7/9 77.7%
Route 6 -11 13/16 81.25%
-12 13/16 81.25%
-14 9/20 45%
-11 32/37 86.50%
Total -12 33/37 89.20%
-14 19/38 50%
ISHO Triggering Process – Ec/Io Threshold
68 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Routes RSCP (IS-HO Success) % IS-HO
Threshold /(Attempts) success rate
-105 9/9 100%
Route 2 -106 9/9 100%
-107 8/9 88%
Route 3 -105 10/10 100%
-106 14/15 93.3%
-107 11/15 73.3%
-105 8/9 88%
Route 4 -106 8/9 88%
-107 6/9 66%
-105 21/25 84%
Route 6 -106 16/20 80%
-107 -- --
-105 48/53 90.5%
Total -106 47/53 88.7%
-107 25/33 75.8%
IS-HO performance at threshold values of –105 dB and –106 dB is very similar.
ISHO Triggering Process – RSCP Threshold
69 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Routes UE Tx Pwr (IS-HO Success) % IS-HO
Threshold /(Attempts) Success rate
-1 6/6 100%
Route 2 -3 6/6 100%
-5 6/6 100%
-1 10/10 100%
Route 3 -3 9/9 100%
-5 9/10 90%
Route 4 -1 6/6 100%
-3 6/6 100%
-5 6/6 100%
-1 22/30 73.30%
Route 6 -3 27/30 90.00%
-5 22/25 88%
-1 44/52 84.60%
Total -3 48/51 94.00%
-5 43/47 91.50%
The results show that a threshold= -3 dB is large enough to provide a good performance.
ISHO Triggering Process – UE Tx Power Threshold
70 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Routes RSCP (IS-HO Success) % IS-HO
Threshold /(Attempts) success rate
-1 0/6 0%
Route 2 -2 0/6 0%
-3 6/6 100%
-1 1/6 16.6%
Route 4 -2 1/6 16.6%
-3 6/6 100%
-1 6/20 --
Route 6 -2 -- --
-3 13/20 65%
-1 7/32 21.9%
Total -2 1/12 8.3%
-3 25/32 78%
Clearly, the IS-HO performance at the threshold GsmDlTxPrwAMR =–3 dB is the best: excellent performance (100 % success rate) at medium speeds but degradation occurs at high speed (route 6).
ISHO Triggering Process – DL Tx Power Threshold
71 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Parameter Suggested values
HHoEcNoThreshold -12 dB
HHoEcNoCancel -9 dB
CPICH EcNo HHoEcNoCancelTime 640 ms
HHoEcNoTimeHysteresis 100 ms
EcNoFilterCoefficient 600 ms
HHoRscpThreshold -105 dBm
CPICH RSCP HHoRscpCancel -103 dBm
HHoRscpFilterCoefficient 200 ms
HHoRscpTimeHysteresis 100 ms
HHoRscpCancelTime 640 ms
UL Tx Power GsmUETxPwrThrAMR -3 dB
GsmUETxPwrFilterCoeff 10ms
GsmUETxPwrTimeHyst 320ms
DL DCH GsmDLTxPwrThrAMR -3 dB
UL Quality ULQualDetRepThreshold 0.5s
Measurement GsmMeasRepInterval 0.5 s
Reporting GsmNcellSearchPeriod 0
Parameters GsmMaxMeasPeriod 20 meas. report
GsmMinMeasInterval 2s
HO AdjgRxLevMinHO -98 to -100 dBm
Decision AdjgTxPwrMaxTCH 33 dBm
Algorithm GsmMeasAveWindow 6 meas. report
ISHO Triggering Process – Parameter Summary
72 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
GSM Measurement Reporting Process
RNC
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
GsmMeasRepInterval (default 0.5s)
GSMMaxMeasPeriod Max 6 GSM cells reported
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement report”
RRC: ”Measurement Control”
Handover Command
Handover Complete
Handover Failure
Triggering
Details about the measurements
• Inter-system measurement stops if RNC has not been able to perform inter-system handover after GSMMaxMeasPeriod (value 10, default =20, 1…20, step 1 meas report)
• RNC could not initiate inter-system measurements if:
• The UE has « recently » performed an inter-system HO: GSMMinHoInterval / 10s, 0…60, step 1s
• An inter-system HO « recently » fails for this UE: GSMMinMeasInterval / 10s, 0…60, step 1s
The first measurement report has info from the best GSM cell: BCCH freq & RSSI, no filtering
used in UE
73 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• The RNC databuild parameters GsmMeasRepInterval (0.5 s) and
GsmMaxMeasPeriod (10 measurement reports) define the maximum combined
time which may be used for GSM RSSI measurements and BSIC verifcation, i.e.
5 secs
• If GSM RSSI measurements are completed successfully and if there is only a
single GSM neighbour on the strongest GSM RF carrier then the RNC issues the
Cell Change Order from UTRAN message
• If GSM RSSI measurements are completed successfully and if there are multiple
GSM neighbours on the strongest GSM RF carrier then the RNC instructs BSIC
verification only for the neighbours on that RF carrier
• Both RSSI measurements and BSIC verification make use of a 7 slot
transmission gap every 4 radio frames
GSM Measurement Reporting Process
74 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
GsmMeasRepInterval (default value=0.5 seconds)
• The GSM measurement reporting interval given by this parameter should be
kept to 0.5 seconds (default value)
• Increasing the reporting interval would increase the IS-HO process delay
• Besides, accuracy requirements related to the GSM measurements in
compressed mode are given for a reporting interval of 0.5 seconds (480ms TS
25.133)
GsmMaxMeasPeriod ( default value = 20 measurement reports)
• This parameter controls the maximum compressed mode duration time for
each GSM RSSI and BSIC decoding measurement process. The duration of
this parameters in seconds is given by:
max_meas_time (s) = GsmMaxMeasPeriod x GsmMeasRepInterval
• Thus, the default value of GsmMaxMeasPeriod in seconds is 12
GSM Measurement Reporting Process
75 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
GsmMinMeasInterval (default value=10 seconds):
• In case of an unsuccessful IS-HO attempt, the network will deactivate compressed
mode for a time period given by this parameter value
• The network will reactivate automatically compressed mode after the timer has
expired unless a cancellation event is sent by the terminal during that period
• In case IS-HO cancellation event does not occur, and the mobile is leaving clearly the
3G boundary, then there is a death time equal to 10 seconds in which the UE is not
able to attempt new GSM measurements in case of an unsuccessful IS-HO.
• Experience in the field has shown that the probability of having a cancellation event
(event 1B,1E), after an IS-HO was requested, is very low and therefore the
GsmMinMeasInterval is reduced to a lower value (2 seconds) to speed up the
reactivation of the compressed mode
Trigger threshold
Cancelation threshold
Terminal in Compressed mode
Unsuccessful ISHO 8 s 10 s
Terminal in normal mode
Terminal in Compressed mode
Compressed mode is reactivated automatically by
the network af ter the GsmMinMeasInterval timer
expires
GSM Measurement Reporting Process
76 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• The Inter-system handover decision process need to be optimized so that the network selects the best GSM target cell which compliance with the following formula:
AVE_RXLEV_NCELL(n) > AdjgRxLevMinHO (n) + max( 0, AdjgTxPwrMaxTCH (n) -
P_MAX )
• AVE_RXLEV_NCELL(n): is the average RSSI level from the cell n
• P_MAX is the maximum power in GSM classmark (+33 dBm)
• AdjgTxPwrMaxTCH (n): is the maximum power of the traffic channel in GSM (default=+33 dBm)
• AdjgRxLevMinHO (n): Minimum required RX level of the target GSM cell to do handover (default=-95 dBm)
• Thus, if P_MAX and AdjgTxPwrMaxTCH (n) default values are used, then the formula simplifies to:
AVE_RXLEV_NCELL(n) > AdjgRxLevMinHO (n)
• AdjgRxLevMinHO(n): The sensitivity of a GSM MS is –104/-102 dBm in GSM 900 MS and –100/-102 dBm for DCS 1800 MS (TS 45.005)
• Since the handover decision process usually only uses one RSSI measurement sample per neighbour with an accuracy of +/- 6 dB (from specs), it may happen that the terminal reports a GSM level of –95 dBm when actual level is –101 dBm
• Could consider using average at RNC with lower threshold value
Handover Decision Process Optimisation
77 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Optimized values
CPICH EcNo
HHoEcNoCancel 3dB above EcNo threshold
HHoEcNoCancelTime 640 ms
CPICH RSCP
HHoRscpCancel 3dB above RSCP threshold
HHoRscpCancelTime 640 ms
• The cancellation thresholds 3dB above the triggering works the best
• Values of the cancellation filters (HHoEcNoCancelTime and HHoRscpCancelTime) depend actually on coverage i.e. in case of fast changes then the filters values should be relatively long to avoid possible ping-pong (initiate IS-HO, cancel, initiate and so on…)
• In case some such ping-pong noted then longer cancellation filters should be tried
ISHO Cancellation Parameter Optimisation
78 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
3G->2G for PS data (network controlled cell reselection)
•Uses compressed mode (in both RAN & mobile) for measuring how good 2G coverage exists, before RNC moves the control of the call to BSC
•No resources reserved in BSS in advance; thus the PS data call continues on best effort basis, like all PS data calls in 2G
•No need for BSIC identification
2G->3G for PS data (UE controlled cell-reselection)
•Terminal measures neighboring cells during different time slots (no compressed mode needed) for measuring how good 3G coverage exists, before BSC moves the control of the call to RNC •No resources reserved in RNC in advance; thus the PS data call continues on best effort basis in 3G
WCDMA <-> GSM PS data inter-working functionality
79 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Throughput degradation in the 3G->GSM frontier exists partly due to the CM activation but also due
to the poor 3G radio conditions
• Below is the average throughput in good and poor 3G coverage
• The definition of poor and good coverage is defined as :
• Good 3G coverage: CPICH EcNo>=-10 dB, CPICH RSCP>-100 dBm
• Poor 3G coverage: CPICH EcNo<-10 dB, CPICH RSCP< -100 dBm
ftp Throughput in ISHO Zones, 384 RAB (server
x.x.x.111 /121)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1
kB
ps
Good 3G coverage
Poor 3G coverage
GPRS
ftp Throughput in ISHO Zones, 64 RAB (server
x.x.x.111 /121)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
kB
ps
Good 3G coverage
Poor 3G coverage
GPRS
ftp Throughput in ISHO Zones, 128 RAB (server
x.x.x.111 /121)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1
kB
ps
Good 3G coverage
Poor 3G coverage
GPRS
6.51
5.41
2.7
17 %, downgrade
43.03
37.76
2.7
12 %, downgrade
15.35
13.82
2.7
10 %, downgrade
10 to 17 % Service downgrade due to coverage and CM between good and poor 3G coverage areas
Throughput in poor coverage includes throughput during compressed mode .
64k RAB 128k RAB 384k RAB
WCDMA <-> GSM PS data inter-working functionality
80 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Cell Change Order (CCO) to GSM
• Triggers
• GsmUETxPwrThrNrtPS (range -10..0 dB,default: -1 dB): This parameter determines the UE
TX power threshold for a non-real time PS data connection. Values –1 dB and –3dB tested.
• GsmDLTxPwrThrNrtPS (range –10..0 dB,default;- 1 dB): This parameter determines the
downlink DPCH TX power threshold for a non-real time PS data connection. Values –1dB
and –3 dB tested.
• Other Parameters Parameter Default Values used
HHoEcNoThreshold -22 dB -12 dB
HHoEcNoCancel - 20 dB -9 dB
CPICH EcNo HHoEcNoCancelTime 1280 ms 640 ms
HHoEcNoTimeHysteresis 640 ms 100 ms
EcNoFilterCoefficient 600 ms 600 ms
HHoRscpThreshold -105 dBm -105 dBm
CPICH RSCP HHoRscpCancel -100 dBm -103 dBm
HHoRscpFilterCoefficient 200 ms 200 ms
HHoRscpTimeHysteresis 640 ms 100 ms
HHoRscpCancelTime 1280 ms 640 ms
UL Quality ULQualDetRepThreshold 5 s 0.5s
UL Tx Power GsmUETxPwrThrNrtPS -1 dB -1, -3 dB
GsmUETxPwrFilterCoeff 10 ms 10ms
GsmUETxPwrTimeHyst 1280 ms 320ms
DL DCH GsmDLTxPwrThrNrtPS -1 dB -1, -3 dB
81 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
• Required equipment for 3G/2G neighbour refining
• 2G and 3G scanners + UE in dual mode (outdoor measurements)
• 3G->2G neighbours could be optimized with a prioritization algorithm.
• Priority 1: ISHO failure
• Find the missing neighbours which cause the call failure during the drive test.
• Careful analysis with 2G Scanner and UE data
• Priority 2: poor 3G coverage but good GSM coverage
• 2G and 3G scanner data used to compare signals.
• 3G signal is compared to ISHO triggering parameter values (e.g.
HHoRSCPThreshold, HHoEcNoThreshold)
• GSM neighbor is added if the ISHO condition is met. (2G RSSI>
GsmncellRxLevMinHO)
• Priority 3: good 3G and GSM coverage (probable ISHO when going inside the
building
• 2G and 3G scanner data used to compare signals.
• GSM neighbours of this class are added only when there is still room to reach
the max # of ADJG per cell.
• GSM RSSI > GSMncellRXLevMinHO +Indoor loss (15-25 dB)
3G/2G Neighbour Verification Process - Example
82 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Module 5 – Inter System Handover Optimisation
Summary
• Proper Cell reselection will improve call setup success, it
can be managed with parameters, some margin should be
left to avoid ping-pong
• Good inter-system neighbour planning is key to maintain
the service, the neighbour list should be not too long
• Compressed mode delays the ISHO, for PS data it is
shorter due to no need of BSIC decoding but PS
throughput will be degraded during CM
83 © Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date
Version control
Version Date Status Owner
RAN04 2006 Base version Mike Roche, Steve Hunt,
Gareth Davies, Pekka Ranta