RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD. JAIPUR PRESENTATION ON PREPARATION OF DPR FOR PALI(RAMASIYA) –SOMESAR - BUSI- NADOL.

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD. JAIPUR

PRESENTATION ON PREPARATION OF DPR FOR

PALI(RAMASIYA) –SOMESAR - BUSI- NADOL (SH67) – DESURI – GOMTI (SH16) ROAD

DEVELOPMENT ON ANNUAITY MODEL

Here comes your footer Page 2

PALI (RAMASYA)-GOMTI ROAD (SH-67,SH-16)


NECESSITYNECESSITY

Improved connectivity Development of the surroundings A boost to tourist Golden Triangle of Rajasthan – Jodhpur to Udaipur Shorter connection for Jodhpur with Udaipur



LENGTH (Km)LENGTH (Km)

Total Length of main Link is 91.450 Km Details of Proposed Bypasses Given below,

S.No Village NameLength of Bypass

(m)

1 Sonai Maji 2225

2 Bussi 1875

3 Devli 2875

4 Kharda 970

5 Nadol 4800

6 Desuri 4800

Total (Km) 17.545



SCOPE Preparation of Detailed Project Report

- Site reconnaissance- Road Inventory- Pavement Condition - Soil Investigation- Topographical Survey- Improvement Proposal- Finalization of Bypass Alignment - Detailed Design of Geometrics, Pavement & Structures- Detailed design of Road Appurtenances- Preparation of BOQ- Calculation of Annuity




EXISTING WIDTH

ROAD SECTIONSLENGTH

(KM)EXISTING WIDTH REMARK

RAMASYA-DESURI(Km 0/0 - Km 64/100)

64.000

3.7M CARRIAGEWAY WITH GRAVEL

SHOULDER

Widen upto 2-Lane with Paved Shoulder

DESURI-GOMTI(Km 64/100 - Km 91/450)

27.3505.5M CARRIAGEWAY

WITH GRAVEL SHOULDER

Widen upto 2-Lane with Paved Shoulder

PRESENT STATUS



SN Village Name Proposed Chainage (Km)

Start End

1 Hemawas 2+350 3+400

2 Sonai Maji 7+500 8+600

3 Gurnarkar 12+200

4 Sodawas 13+300 14+900

5 Tawali 17+900 190+00

6 Busi 21+100 23+000

7 Somesar 27+100 28+300

8 Dudhariya 29+300

9 Devli 38+800 40+200

10 Kharda 41+400 42+400

11 Nadol 47+000 49+600

12 Narlai 58+280 60+400

13 Dessuri 64+100 67200

14 Gomti 89+500 91+450

VILLAGES ENROUTE

PRESENT STATUS



CEMENT CONCRETE ROAD

SN

Chainage

LengthType of

WideningWidening

SideRemarks

From To

1 7+820 7+980 160 Concentric Both CC Road






PRESENT STATUS



EXISTING CRUST

SN SHChainag

ePit No.

SidePavement Shoulder

PMCPMC Old

BM WBM GSB GSB Soil

1

67

30 1 R 25 65 420 270

2 35 2 R 80 125 215 175

3 55 3 L 25 80 380 280

4 45 4 L 20 50 85 310 210

5 40 5 L 25 30 65 385 320

6 50 6 L 20 30+20 80 210 200

PRESENT STATUS



STRUCTURES

S No. Type Length Nos. Proposed

1 Causeway Up to 10m 10 Replaced

2 Causeway 10 to 20m 5 Replaced

3 Causeway 20 to 30m 9 Replaced

4 Causeway More than 30m 9 Replaced

S

No.

Type Length Nos. Proposed

1 Pipe Culvert 0.600-1.20m Dia 38 4 Retain and 34 Reconstruction

2 Slab Culvert 0.5m to 2.0m 74 26 Retain and 48 Reconstruction

Causeway

Culverts

PRESENT STATUS



SNo

Chainage (Km)

Existing Structure

Conditions RemarksType

Total Length (m)

Width (m)

1 58+550 Slab 6.0 6.0 Good Retain



4 285+732 Slab 12.6 11.3 Poor Replace


6 286+225 Slab 12.2 7.6 Fair Retain





11 296+068Arch Bridge

12.0 11.5 Poor Replace

Minor Bridges

PRESENT STATUS



Major Bridges

Sno.Chainage

(Km)

Existing StructureConditi

onsRemarks

TypeTotal Length

(m)Width (m)

1 70+040 Slab 88.4 8.3 Fair Retain

Major Bridge at Chainage 70+040 Minor Bridge at Chainage 281+172

PRESENT STATUS



Ch. Deflection MSA BM (Overlay) WMM DBM/BC

1.25 20 120 180 84

Proposed (Overlay) DBM BC PCC (<120) PCC (>120)

Th.(mm) 50 40 DBM WMM

New Crust CBR (Assumed) MSA Design Yr.

7% 20 20

New Crust Thicknesses

GSB WMM DBM BC

230 250 50 40

ESTIMATED OVERLAY

PROPOSED DEVELOPEMENT



LIST OF REPLACED BRIDGES

S. no.

Existing Chainage

(Km)

Proposed Chainage

(Km)

Proposed Structure

Type Span (m)Total

Length (m)

Width (m)

1 285+732 72+470 Box Bridge 1.0 8.0 8.0 12.9

2 286+091 72+853 Box Bridge 1.0 6.0 6.0 12.9

3 286+428 73+214 Box Bridge 1.0 8.0 8.0 12.9

4 287+742 74+506 Box Bridge 1.0 8.0 8.0 12.9

5 293+620 80+375 Box Bridge 1.0 8.0 8.0 12.9

6 296+068 82+825 Box Bridge 2.0 6.0 12.0 12.9




S.No Village Name

Chainage Length of Bypass

RemarksFrom To

1 Sonai Maji 6+980 9+040 2225 Left

2 Bussi 21+480 23+550 1875 Right

3 Devli 38+050 40+960 2875 Right

4 Kharda 41+900 42+900 970 Left-Right

5 Nadol 46+375 51+930 4800 Left

6 Desuri 64+275 67+700 4800 Left

PROPOSED BYPASS




Project Cost – 174 Cr. (Mainline 121 Cr. + Bypasses 29 Cr. + Str . 24 Cr.)

Construction Period – 2 Years

Concession Period – 20 Years

Annuity -





RAILWAY CROSSING & ROB

A Broad Gauge Railway Track Crosses the Project Corridor at Chainage Km 28+555 near Somesar Village.

No ROB has been Proposed along this Road .

Here comes your footer




DATE OF SUBMISSION OF DPR


LIKELY DATE OF START OF WORK

Page 21



TAKE OFF

STARTING AT RAMASIYA, KM 29+000 TAKING OFF FROM NH14, KM 115+000

Page 22



CANAL CROSSING REALIGNMENT PROPOSED ON RIGHT

Page 23

SHARP CURVE



FIRST VILLAGE ON THE ALIGNMENT- HEMAWAS

EARTHEN BUND ON LEFT HABITATIONON RIGHT SIDE ONLY

Page 24



BYPASS CANDIDATE – SONAI MAJI

CONJETION INSIDE EARTHEN BUND ON RIGHT

Page 25



BYPASS CANDIDATE –VILLAGE SODAWAS

VILLAGE SODAWAS JUST FIT FOR 10M

Page 26



BYPASS CANDIDATE – VILLAGE BUSSI

VILLAGE BUSSI – BYPASS CANDIDATE VILLAGE BUSSI – FROM INSIDE

Page 27



DANGEROUS CURVE

Starting chainage at 69+000

End chainage at

77+000

Page 28


Here comes your footerINDEX MAP Page 29



THANK YOU


RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD. JAIPUR PRESENTATION ON PREPARATION OF DPR FOR PALI(RAMASIYA) –SOMESAR - BUSI- NADOL.

Documents

footer page

paved shoulder desurigomti

annuaity model slide

length of bypass

gravel shoulder

30m9replaced s

structures s

total length of main