Top Banner
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann versight and Safety Divisi September 2015
21

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

Jan 04, 2016

Download

Documents

Cordelia Quinn
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Alan C. MannOversight and Safety Division

September 2015

Page 2: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

BASIC D.I.M.P.

Getting The Ball Rolling

Page 3: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

Distribution Integrity Management

• 49 CFR Part 192.1001-1015 (Subpart P)– Gas Distribution Integrity Management (IM)

3

Page 4: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 – Required Elements

a) Knowledgeb) Threat Identification

c) Evaluate and Rank Riskd) Identify and Implement Measures to Reduce Riske) Measure Performance, Monitor Results, Evaluate

Effectivenessf) Periodic Evaluation and Improvement.g) Report Results

4

Page 5: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P

192.1007 (a) KNOWLEDGE: Demonstrate an understanding of your gas distribution system(s) developed from

reasonably available information. •Records: – (1) Characteristics of the system’s design, operations, and

environmental factors.– (2) Information from past design, operations and

maintenance.– (3) Identify your “unknowns” and devise a plan to gain that

knowledge through normal activities.– (4) Develop and Implement a DIM Plan review/improvement

process. (This becomes a record of knowledge.) – (5) Capture and retain records regarding new installations.

(Location, Material-Specs, Joining Method, Personnel)5

Page 6: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P

192.1007 (b) IDENTIFY THREATS: Consider the

following categories of threats to each distribution pipeline. • CORROSION• NATURAL FORCES• EXCAVATION DAMAGE• OTHER OUTSIDE FORCE DAMAGE• MATERIAL OR JOINT FAILURE (including compression couplings)• EQUIPMENT FAILURE• INCORRECT OPERATION• OTHER CONCERNS (which could affect integrity of the pipeline)

6

Page 7: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 (c) EVALUATE and RANK RISK: Determine the relative importance of each threat, estimate,

rank risk posed to your pipeline.

Must Consider:• Current Threats• Potential Threats

• Likelihood of Failure Associated with EACH THREAT

• Potential Consequences of Such Failures

7

Page 8: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 (c) EVALUATE and RANK RISK: Determine the relative importance of each threat, estimate,

rank risk posed to your pipeline. Must Consider:• Current Threats• Potential Threats• Likelihood of Failure Associated with EACH THREAT• Potential Consequences of Such Failures• You may subdivide your pipeline into regions with similar characteristics, where similar actions would likely be effective.• Subdivisions must be contiguous and consist of mains, services and other appurtenances.• Areas with common materials or environmental factors.

8

Page 9: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 (d) IDENTIFY and IMPLEMENTMeasures to Address Risk.

• Implementation of plan to reduce the risk of failures within your distribution system.

• Plan MUST include an EFFECTIVE Leakage Management Program. (Unless all leaks are repaired when found.)

9

Page 10: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 (e) MEASURE PERFORMANCEMonitor Results, Evaluate Effectiveness. • Develop and Monitor Performance Measures from an ESTABLISHED BASELINE to evaluate program effectiveness.• Plan MUST include: ₪CATEGORIZED BY CAUSE: Number of Hazardous Leaks either ELIMINATED or REPAIRED as required by 192.703(c.) or total number of leaks if all leaks are repaired when found.₪ Number of Excavation Damages.₪ Number of Excavation Tickets.₪ Total Number of Leaks by Cause, (eliminated or repaired).₪ Additional Measures deemed necessary by the operator which are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the IM program in controlling each identified threat.

10

Page 11: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 (f) PERIODIC EVALUATION and IMPROVEMENT• Operator MUST re-evaluate THREATS and RISKS on their pipeline and consider the relevance of threats in one location to other areas.

• Also, MUST define appropriate period for conducting complete program re-evaluations based on system complexity and changes in factors affecting risk of failure.

• Program Re-evaluation must be at a minimum of 5 years.

• Operator MUST consider the results of the performance monitoring in these evaluations.

11

Page 12: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1007 (g) REPORT RESULTS

• Report on an ANNUAL basis the results of the measures listed in 192.1007 (e)(1)(i) through (e)(1)(iv) as a part of the annual reporting required by 49 CFR 191.11. (Also must report this to the Commission).

12

Page 13: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1009 REPORTING COMPRESSION COUPLING FAILURES• Annually to PHMSA and to the Railroad Commission-• Information related to Compression Coupling Failure in regard to HAZARDOUS LEAKS.• Must include: LOCATION of failures in the system Nominal Pipe Size Material Type Nature of Failure Coupling Manufacturer Lot number and Date of manufacture Other Information found on the coupling’s markings.

13

Page 14: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P192.1011 REQIRED RECORDS

• Records Demonstrating Compliance with Subpart P.

• Records must be maintained for a minimum of 10 years.

• Records must include copies of previous versions of the DIM plan, including superseded plans developed under Subpart P.

14

Page 15: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192 Subpart PUnwritten Needs:

• CAPABLE / COMPETENT DIMP MANAGER.• AVAILABILITY of ASSETS for DEVELOPMENT,

IMPLEMENTATION and RE-EVALUATION. (MANPOWER, MATERIALS/RESOURCES, TIME)

15

Page 16: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR Part 192, Subpart P

OUTSOURCING: CONTRACTING A PROGRAM DEVELOPER

• STILL requires you to provide all the information (knowledge) you would normally have with an in-house program.

• STILL requires you to constantly update the written plan as your system evolves through upgrades and threat mitigation. (This includes having the latest version of a contracted plan.)

• STILL requires you to maintain and improve records of operations and maintenance pertinent to the DIM Plan.

16

Page 17: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart PThe DIMP Manager should treat the program like it is his/her baby.

The DIMP Manager should look at the distribution system as if it was their castle, eliminating the most likely ways the fortress would be compromised in order of succession (and documenting it), until it is virtually impossible for the enemy (pipeline failures) to storm the walls (or via other routes) and putting the family to the sword.

17

Page 18: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

THE PUZZLE WILL COME TOGETHER

18

Page 19: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

THE PUZZLE WILL COME TOGETHER

19

• Don’t let this be your castle!

Page 20: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

THE PUZZLE WILL COME TOGETHER

20

• Let this be your castle!

Page 21: RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

49 CFR 192, Subpart P

QUESTIONS ?

21