Page 1
Richard Kerry – TYPSA Country Representative - BULGARIA – Management Board Member BACCRC
Project DirectorPlovdiv-Svilengrad Railway Supervision Team (PSRST)GSM: +359 (0) 885 007 518 – Email: [email protected] - Consortium Partners: TYPSA, SYSTRA, Louis Berger, Rubicon, Trademco
Project Website – plovdivsvilengradrailway.com
10 November 2011
Page 2
1. Project Overview
2. Progress
3. Challenges
4. Project Summary
Bg version of presentation available at Project Website plovdivsvilengradrailway.com
Page 5
Funding Split - EU Commission / EIB / Local Varying Percentages ISPA / OPT / EIB Circa. 420m Eur Total Out-turn (Budget Estimate) ISPA Cut-Off End 2010 ‘Bridge Project’ – ISPA to OPT (‘One-off’) ISPA – ‘Leg 1’ – Phase 1, 2 & Systems OPT – ‘Leg 2’ – Phase 3, 4 & Systems
Page 6
PHASE 4a T.B.C.
PHASE 4b T.B.C.
PHASE 4c T.B.C.
Page 7
Project Length – approx. 150 Km Approx. 17 Km Double Track (Phase 1) 160 Km/hr Conventional Trains 200 Km/hr Tilting Trains Standard UIC Gauge – 1435 mm, UIC 60 Rails ‘Classic’ Single Phase 25 Kv AC Current 50 Hz OHL 27 Stations & Halts – New Build / Rehabilitation Connection to 110 Kv National Power Supply Traction Power sub-stations (5 No.) Extensive Structures – Bridges, Underpasses,
Culverts Etc.
Page 9
Katunitsa Station – Phase 1Katunitsa Station – Phase 1
Page 10
Skobelevo Halt – Phase 2Skobelevo Halt – Phase 2
Page 11
Karadjalovo Station – Phase 2Karadjalovo Station – Phase 2
Page 12
Parvomai Station – Phase 1Parvomai Station – Phase 1
Page 13
Parvomai TrackworkParvomai Trackwork
Page 14
Karadjalovo – View WestKaradjalovo – View West
Page 15
Phase 1 – Double Track SectionPhase 1 – Double Track Section
Page 16
Phase 1 - Double Track SectionPhase 1 - Double Track Section
Page 17
Phase 2 – Road OverpassPhase 2 – Road Overpass
Page 18
Phase 3 – Maritza BridgePhase 3 – Maritza Bridge
Page 19
Phase 3 – Maritza BridgePhase 3 – Maritza Bridge
Page 20
Phase 1 – Chesnigirovo HaltPhase 1 – Chesnigirovo Halt
Page 21
Systems – Power Dispatchers SCADA display Systems – Power Dispatchers SCADA display
Page 23
Project Not Technically Challenging, but:
Operational railway Changing Standards / Regulations Changing Technology Adjacent River (Maritza) / High water table Interfacing between contracts / other
stakeholders Materials supply Design / Build Philosophy
Consider construction technology Manage the process (invest in this)
Page 24
Phase 3 – Time Saving Solution Phase 3 – Time Saving Solution (Design / Build ‘Innovation’) (Design / Build ‘Innovation’)
Page 25
Late, inadequate, mobilisation Insufficient understanding of the market Insufficient experienced resources (cost
cutting) Inadequate ‘ownership’ of designer / sub-
contractor inputs Contractor required to ‘Manage’ the process, Contractor required to manage to programme
(invest in this ) Low bids
Page 26
Foreign / Local understanding each other Respect?
Decision making Delegated Authority Responsibility / Accountability
Appreciation of ‘urgency’ Authorities Municipalities
Planning – Foresight – not ‘Firefighting’ Safety
Employer
Page 27
Territorial Arrangement Act Construction Permits Act 15/ 16
Public Procurement Act Change Management – Art 90 Change is Difficult
Law of Contracts and Obligations Contract operates within this Good Faith
NRIC Regulations
Page 28
Competitive Tenders Contractors’ / Consultants’ Risk!
Change? – See Public Procurement Act
Cashflow Advance Payment Payment Terms – As Contract
Page 29
Land Acquisition Trees Archaeology Municipalities Roads Agency – Junction Tie-ins Interoperability Accessibility (Ramps if Possible) Environmental
Page 31
Difficult project First of its size and complexity in modern
times in Bulgaria Approx 80Km (55%) of total Plov-Svil
railway (track) is implemented Many lessons being learnt by many
stakeholders Positive inputs for the future development
of the railways in Bulgaria Project primary objectives – will be met
Still some way to go….
Page 32
General Observations
Thorough pre-planning is essential – all stages
Invest in design / investigation – all stages Engage Municipalities / Roads Agency early Recommend Standard Contract Documents
(Eg. FIDIC) – Apportion risks fairly, certainty Training of stakeholders Consider modification to the legal framework
for such projects? Consider implementation of ‘Lessons Learnt’