RADIOISOTOPE-BASED PROPULSION SYSTEM ENABLING EXPLORATION WITH SMALL PAYLOADS Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2015 Albuquerque, New Mexico February 24 th , 2015 A Project Overview: NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase I Award FY 2014 Nathan Jerred, Troy Howe & Dr. Steven Howe Center for Space Nuclear Research Adarsh Rajguru University of Southern California
29
Embed
Radioisotope Propulsion System - American Nuclear …anstd.ans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/5098_Jerred-et...RADIOISOTOPE-BASED PROPULSION SYSTEM ENABLING EXPLORATION WITH SMALL
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
RADIOISOTOPE-BASED PROPULSION SYSTEM ENABLING EXPLORATION WITH SMALL PAYLOADS
Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2015 Albuquerque, New Mexico
February 24th, 2015
A Project Overview: NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase I Award FY 2014
Nathan Jerred, Troy Howe & Dr. Steven Howe Center for Space Nuclear Research
Adarsh Rajguru University of Southern California
• Limited budgets make large missions more difficult to fund – achieve more science-per-dollar
– long-lived and long-ranged mobile platform – off-the-shelf propulsion system – propulsion system for micro-satellite payloads
Inspiration
1U CubeSat frame
Project GOAL – deliver 6U CubeSat payload to Enceladus orbit (~15 kg) – develop an appropriately sized propulsion system concept – develop the mission architecture
• Target small launch vehicles – less than 1,000 kg to LEO
• heritage use within NASA – high specific energy: 1.6 x 106 MJ/kg (thermal)
• Chemical propellants: 10 MJ/kg (thermal) • RTG: 9.6x104 MJ/kg (6%) vs Li-ion: 0.72 MJ/kg (electric)
– poor specific power: 0.392 W/g [238PuO2]
O’Brien et al.
Concept energy source
Tungsten-based CERMET
238 PuO2 Pellet
DOE
• Fuel Containment – fuel encapsulated in a tungsten-based matrix
• provides high strength & toughness – can provide great energy density
• Radioisotope-Based Core – decay energy accumulated within central core, i.e. thermal
capacitor
Approach
– direct propellant heating for propulsion
• radioisotope thermal rocket (RTR) – thermal energy converted to
electrical energy • electric propulsion • power generation
– accumulated energy is depleted through each impulse
artistic rendering of the concept in Earth orbit
• Thermal Capacitor Qualifications – high thermal storage, high thermal conductivity,
high melting temperature – sensible heat based on a material’s heat
capacity – latent heat based on energy needed to induce
a material’s phase change
Allows for an operational temperature of around 1700 K
Concept energy storage
• Core Material – Silicon identified as a suitable material ΔHfusion = 1.8 MJ/kg kth = 148 W/m-K Tmelt = 1687 K
Radioisotope Heats
Thermal Capacitor
Core Reaches Peak
Temperature
Blowdown of Gas
Through Core
Electrical Conversion
System Produces
Power
Propellant Injected into
Core Produces
Thrust
Impulse-based
Function Performed
Energy Depleted from Core
Regeneration Cycle
• Thermal Capacitor Qualifications – high thermal storage, high thermal conductivity,
high melting temperature – sensible heat based on a material’s heat
capacity – latent heat based on energy needed to induce
a material’s phase change
Concept energy storage
Thermal Capacitor
Radioisotope Power Source
Insulation
Support Structure
Flow Channels
Qin Component Mass Thermal Budget
RPS [kg] 6.44 Qin [Wt] 1,180 238PuO2 [kg] 3
Qresidual [Wt] 385 Silicon [kg] 15.6
Supports [kg] 2.1 Estored [MJ] 30
Insulation [kg] 108
Qloss [Wt] 795 TOTAL [kg] 132
• Thermal interactions within the subsystem – details such as isotope loading, capacitor size, insulation, etc. – determine heat-up time of the thermal subsystem
– 385 Wt for melting the core – heat-up: 20.5 hrs
Thermal Subsystem Modeling
full thermal subsystem
heat-up time modeling
Silicon & W/PuO2 Core
• Direct Propellant Heating – provides thermal-based propulsion – heated propellant expelled through
nozzle creating thrust • Energy Conversion
– closed loop Brayton cycle – 10’s kWe per day
thermal propulsion flow schematic
dual Brayton engines
Concept dual-mode
electrical conversion flow schematic
• Dual -Brayton Engines – 2 x 12.5 kWe
• 25 kWe per pulse – 6 min pulse per day – ~30 % efficiency
• Mass – Turbine/Compressor: 54.1 kg – Heat Rejection: 16.9 kg – Alternator: 15.9 kg – Housing/Pipping: 10 kg
Total: 97 kg
dual Brayton engines
Conversion Subsystem Brayton Engine
electrical conversion flow schematic
heat rejection subsystem dissipation of thermal energy
• Heat Rejection *able to dissipate thermal energy between pulses – Lithium ideal absorber material (Cp = 3.58 kJ/kg-K & Tmelt = 453 K)
• will need a containment canister *enables a low mass, low footprint thermal rejection system & overall conversion subsystem
Conversion Subsystem Heat Rejection
electrical conversion flow schematic
heat rejection subsystem dissipation of thermal energy
interactions between gas & core • Demonstration of Enabling
Technologies
Current & Future Work
decadal survey – enceladus orbiter concept
– energy storage within PCM, i.e. thermal capacitor
– energy conversion with open- & closed-loop Brayton cycle
– demonstrate passive heat rejection with absorber
Europa?
• Extends the realm of micro-satellite exploration and experimentation & engages a broader range of researchers
• Concept can be adapted for the mission – low mass power production unit for orbit station keeping – low mass, high power for deep planetary surface drilling & sampling – strictly radioisotope electric propulsion (REP) system – a planetary surface exploration probe using thermal propulsion to maneuver
Summary
• A reliable interplanetary propulsion system based on radioisotopic energy is possible
– provides versatility to use available power as needed
artistic rendering of concept in Enceladus orbit
Acknowledgments & Thanks
• Funding Provided By: NASA NIAC Phase I Award
• NIAC staff & NIAC general counsel • R.C. O’Brien
– fuel encapsulation • J. Breedlove
– turbo-machinery much insight gained through discussions with all
of CSNR staff & many others artistic rendering of proposed
concept
THANK YOU!! Questions??
O’Brien, R. C., Ambrosi R. M., Bannister, N. P., et al., Spark Plasma Sintering of simulated radioisotope materials within tungsten cermets, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2009, 393(1), 108-113.
O’Brien, R. C., Ambrosi R. M., Bannister, N. P., et al., Safe radioisotope thermoelectric generators and heat sources for space applications, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2008, 377(3), 506-521.
Mattarolo, G., “Development and Modeling of a Thermophotovoltaic System,” Thesis, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dept., University of Kassel. Kassel, Germany (2007).
Goel A., B. Franz, K. J. Schillo, S. Reddy, S. Howe. Design of a Flight Demonstration Experiment for Radioisotope Thermophotovoltaic (RTPV) Power System. Proceedings of Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space. Paper #5002. Albuquerque, NM (2015) Carl M. Stoots. “Emissivity Tuned Emitter For RTPV Power Sources.” Nuclear and Emerging Technologies For Space,The Woodlands, TX,03/21/2012,03/23/2012. (2012).
Larson W. J., Wertz J.R., Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd Edition, Microcosm Press, 2005.
Curtis H. D., Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, Elsevier Aerospace Engineering Series, 2005, pg 268-273.
Gaskell, D. R. Intro. to the Thermodynamics of Materials, 4th Ed. (2003) 587.
Kelley, K. K. “The Specific Heats at Low Temperatures Of Crystalline Boric Oxide, Boron Carbide And Silicon Carbide”. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 63 (1941) 1137-9.
Kantor, K., P. B. Krasovitskaya, R. M. Kisil, O. M. Fiz. “Determining The Enthalpy And Specific Heat Of Beryllium In The Range 600-2200” Phys. Metals and Metallog. 10 (6) (1960) 42-4. Mcl-905/1, Ad-261792.
Booker, J. Paine, R. M. Stonehouse, A. J. Wright. “Investigation Of Intermetallic Compounds For Very High Temperature Applications”. Air Development Division (1961) 1-133. Wadd Tr 60-889, Ad 265625.
Pankratz, L. B. K. K. Kelley. Thermodynamic Data for Magnesium Oxide U S Bur Mines. Report. 1-5 (1963); Bm-Ri-6295.
Kandyba, K., V. V. Kantor, P. B. Krasovitskaya, R. M. Fomichev, E. N. Dokl “Determination Of Enthalpy And Thermal Capacity Of Beryllium Oxide In The Temperature Range From 1200 – 2820” Aec-Tr-4310. (1960) 1-4.
Hedge, J. C., J. W. Kopec, C. Kostenko, J. I. Lang. Thermal Properties Of Refractory Alloys. Aeronautical Systems Division. (1963) 1-128; ( Asd-Tdr-63-597, Ad 424375 )
238PuO2 System T1/2 = 87 yr Specific Power: 0.392 W/g Isotope Mass: 3 kg Encapsulation Mass: 3.44 kg Silicon Mass: 15.6 kg TOTAL: 22 kg
Qin = 1.18 kWt
244Cm2O3 System T1/2 = 18.1 yr Specific Power: 2.269 W/g Isotope Mass: 0.52 kg Encapsulation Mass: 0.72 kg Silicon Mass: 15.6 kg TOTAL: 16.8 kg *will need increased shielding?
241AmO2 System T1/2 = 433 yr Specific Power: 0.094 W/g Isotope Mass: 12.5 kg Encapsulation Mass: 17.3 kg Silicon Mass: 15.6 kg TOTAL: 45.4 kg
Mission Design instrument package
proposed instrument package for Enceladus
*designed for about a 6U CubeSat payload
Instrument TRL Mass (kg) Volume (cm3) Peak Loading Power (W)