Top Banner
Theories on Human Rights R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013
12

R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Kristopher Holt
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Theories on Human Rights

R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013

Page 2: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Aims of Course

The development of human rights thoughts Theoretical approach to human rights

The concept of justice The concept of law and human rights

Page 3: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

References

Heard, Andrew (1997) Human Rights: Chimeras in Sheep’s Clothing? www.sfu.ca

Donnelly, Jack (1989) Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Page 4: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Theory, what is that?

An analysis of facts which are connected each �other

One thing that makes sense or scientifically acceptable general principle or the principle of building that offers an explanation for the phenomenon

Page 5: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Theoretical approach to human rights

Libertarian

Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974), Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge: John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice, & John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971)

Utilitarian

David Lyons’ "Utility and Rights," Nomos XXIV: Ethics, Economics and the Law (New York: New York University Press, 1982), Russell Hardin’s "The Utilitarian Logic of Liberalism," Ethics, 97, 1 (October, 1986), 47-74, Richard B. Brandt’s Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)

Page 6: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Naturalist

Richard Tuck, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979) & James W. Nickel, Making Sense of Human Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).

“Human rights represent a social choice of a particular moral vision of human potentiality, which rests on a particular substantive account of the minimum requirements of a life of dignity” (Donelly 1989: 17)

Page 7: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Approach to rights (1)

How do you see rights perspective from this pic. ?

Is there rights for street vendor?

Page 8: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Approach to rights (2)

And, how about this children?

Is there rights for a child?

Page 9: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Marxian approach to human rights

Marx denounced rights as a fabrication of bourgeois society

‘Market friendly human rights’ (Baxi 2002)

Page 10: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Poverty cycle?

Rights based approach: ‘entitled vs. given?’

Page 11: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.
Page 12: R. Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, 8 October 2013.

Claim Rights

The most common interpretation given to the `right' in human rights is that of claim-rights. There is a defined benefit to which individuals are entitled, and there is a correlative duty on others in relation to that benefit.

This tendency may be partly due to the increasing codification of human rights into legal documents.

It is far more efficacious if human rights are conceived of as claimrights, because those who are deprived of their rights may argue that others (usually their government) must be compelled to fulfill a duty to provide the benefit.