QUPER Paper Outline Yuri Sprockel. Update Unfortunate CCV date pick Cost view elaboration New QUPER PDD almost finished.

QUPERPaper Outline

Yuri Sprockel

Update

•Unfortunate CCV date pick

•Cost view elaboration

•New QUPER PDD almost finished

Message to the world

Concerning QUPER’s applicability in domains other than Telecom

AND

How Method Engineering was involved in the tailoring the QUPER method.

OutletRequirements Enigneering: -Journals -Conferences -Workshops

IEEE RE was 31 August – 4 September

Paper Outline•Abstract

•Introduction Quality in Requirements Engineering

•Acknowledgements

•References

•Related Work

•Conclusion and Further Research

•Case Study Findings

•Results Evaluation

•Research Method/Approach

IntroductionQuality Requirements and main introduction of QUPER

Introduce main interesting result

Paper Outline

Hypotheses: -General Applicability of QUPER (over all domains) -The Suitability of ISO9128 and QUPER

RQ: How can the applicability of QUPER be evaluated for other domains with Method Engineering as a Research Method?How can the applicability of QUPER be evaluated for other domains using Method Engineering?

Problem Statement: QUPER has been designed, but only tested in the Telecom Domain. The validity of QUPER (General or Tailored)

Introduction(The Quper Model)Main introduction of QUPER

Motives for creating a model like QUPER

QUPER Goals and Assumptions

Concepts

Views

Problems that QUPER ‘hopes’ to solve

Research MethodCCV Case study -Experiment Set-up -Interview instrument -Workshop

Key Contribution of Research

The role of Method Engineering in the tailoring of QUPER for CCV -QUPER PDD -QUPER Template

Case Study FindingsMost interesting examples of elaborated Quality aspects -Quality levels -Breakpoints and Barriers -Roadmap

QUPER PDD tailored for CCV -Difference with Original QUPER PDD

Quality Factors covered; with respect to ISO9128 -Or not?

Quality Factors

Regnell, 2009

Results EvaluationEvaluation of Interview data -In depth analysis of answers of the interviews

?

Evaluation of Workshop data -Practitioners’ actions in working with QUPER

Evaluation of possible documents on existing RE Processes

Collaboration with Svensson

Related WorkLiterature of QUPER’s authors -Early work of Svensson and Regnell

Software Product Management (I. van de Weerd) -Release planning -Requirements Engineering

Catalina’s work on QUPER

Conclusion and Further ResearchRecap of QUPER and problem statement

Lessons learned for future research with/on QUPER

Recap of most important and relevant finding

Limitations -QUPER -Case Study

Answer to the RQ

Validate Hypotheses

Acknowledgements and ReferencesThanks -CCV -Svensson and Regnell