Understanding New Migrant Communities Dr Berhanu Kassayie
Aug 19, 2015
Objective
Demystifying the concept ‘migrant’ and migration
Examining trends and characteristics of migration
Exploring evolution in the policy and regulatory framework as well as the impact of migration
Discussion outline
1. Migration, concept and London’s new communities
2. Trends
3. Evolution in policy
4. Migration and its impact
Migration: concept
Who would be counted as a migrant? Asylum seeker Refugee Overseas student A US citizen residing in the UK EU citizen in the UK Commonwealth citizen in the UK Work permit holder Tourist A person on business A child born outside UK
Migration: concept Movement of people resulting in the change of the place of abode by anindividual.
The concept relates to space and time:
1- Space as a usual place of residence, ‘home’ and socially & politically defined in terms of nationality, citizenship , etc.
2-Time related to permanency of dwellings determined by institutionally defined time threshold and associated institutionally classified reason for staying
Migration: concept....In mainstream statistics what mattersfor International Migration is duration of stay in or away from the country permanent residence.
The reality of counting/ census .......1. declaration in country of departure and
arrival 2. declaration only in country of arrival 3 declaration only in country of departure 4. no declaration
Migration- broader context Contradictory context for immigration and
emigration: Emigration internationally recognised
human right but not immigration. 2nd art. of the Universal declarationof Human Rights of 1948
Industrialised countries- as opposed to emigration, immigration is controlled & restricted Netherlands- immigrant after 120 days ,
emigrant after 240 days United Nations 1953- at least 1 year both for
immigrant and emigrant, same for UK
Migration and the UK Premise:
Migration is a historical and permanent
feature of the UK and its specific Characteristics, impact and the challenges it poses to society are dynamic.
.......???
Migration and the UK
No %
British 75 13
EU 197 34
Common Wealth 175 30
Other foreign 131 23
Total 577 100
Gross Inflow by citizenship 2007 000’
British Non-British Total
Gross Immigration
902,000 3,688,000 4,590,000
Gross Emigration
1,521,000 1,450,000 2,971,000
Net immigration
-619,000 +2, 238,000 +1,619,000
Total Migration UK 1997-2006
Migration and the UK Trends on migration
Declining refugee protection Growing economic migration Increased irregularisation of immigrants
UK International Migration 1991-2005
2005: Refugees in Africa 2,571,000, UNHCR
Nature of contemporary migration- 2
Trends in immigration
2004 2005 Change
A8 citizens migrating long-term 52,000 80,000 +54%
Total Asylum Application 33,960 25,710 -25%
More UK example
565,000 arrive to settled in the UK in 2005 375,000 eastern European Registered workers 2004 – 2006 Roughly 310,000 to 570,000 Undocumented migrants 2006
In the mean time in 2005:
380,000 people left UK to leave abroad
EU Enlargement in 2007: No Warm Welcome for Labour Migrants
Refugees: myth and reality 2005
World refugee population * 9, 167, 900 Region Refugees Asylum seekers Total
Africa 33 33 33 Asia 39 12 36 Europe 21 29 21 Latin America & Caribbean 0 1 1 Northern America 6 25 8 Oceania 1 0 1 Total 100 100 100
Germany 0.9 0.1 0.8
United Kingdom 0.3 0.9 0.3
Refugees: myth and reality
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
Refugees Asylum seekers
Refugees: myth and reality- England
Population 49.1m. Economically inactive 29% or 14.2mPopulation support ratio 2.2:1
Asylum seekers 59,000 Potential refugee settlement demand :
0.1% of population 0.001 person / 1000 citizens.
Getting population support ratio close to the 3:1 would mean: 95,000 inward migration for the next 20
years The deficit in 2001 amounted 35,500
Refugees: myth and reality- England Estimate based on 30% success rate:
Potential refugee settlement:
0.5% population or 0.05 refugees / 1000 citizens.
Economic implications:0.03% rise in unemployment0.007% decline in unfilled vacant
positions 0.001% rise in BME population 0.9 Vacant housing per homeless
person including refugees.
The net effect .....
UK born
Foreign born
Net contribution to exchequer 2001/02
-£222 +£331
Net cost the exchequer 2003/04
£892 £74
Migration impact UK
Migration and the UK Public Services Majority of migrants use relatively fewer
public services than indigenous households
Inter-community relationship Social cohesion within London has
generally remained strong, but there are pockets
Migration and the UK Housing Effects Migrants form fewer households than their
indigenous counterparts, hence consume less
house and live disproportionately in private rented sector
Long-term impact depend on income and churn
Migrants and foreign investors pressure on house prices
Eligible for social housing varies and changes, is a factor for tension
Migration and London Historically founded by migrants from Italy A multi-cultural world city Cosmopolitan
residents from 147 countries (2001 census) Dynamic hyper diversity
Migration and London
Dynamic hyper diversity but with somepredominant groups, not necessarily thosefeaturing in mainstream discourse
The trend for inward migration is upwards but this should be factored into London’s place within the UK and worldwide
Migration and London
Qualitative impact : diversity, flexibility, international experience and skill setsQuantitative contribution: expanding labour supply, enabling employment growth, reducing upward wage pressure
Migration and London
London- migration impact London’s Population Change: + 800,000
people in 20 years since 1998, total 2 millEconomic and Labour Market- High net inward migration in the working
age range employment rates & earnings of migrants
are lower than comparable Londoners. downward pressure on wages at the bottom
end of market encouraging job growth employment and skill potential of migrants
underused
Changing times: forces & factors Historically, the law of uneven development across regions and nations is the primary driver of migration throughout the world.
Dynamics since 1990 Rapid globalisation
The end of the cold war
Dynamics of Western nations
September 11
Rapid globalisation
Disproportionate distribution of advancement and widening gap in opportunities
Enhanced flow of capital and goods but restricted movement of labour
The world has become a global village Broader implication to society
Transnational economy, culture Persistent nationalistic
institution
Changing times: forces & factors
Changing times: forces & factors
The collapse of the Soviet system - ‘end of history’
Capitalist transformation Re-emergence of
‘Nationalism ‘New nations’ and new conflicts
New migration from ‘non-traditional’ regions
Increased conflict and immigration from Third World
The end of the cold war
Changing times: forces & factors
Race in ‘globalisation’ Aging population
Increased demand for inward migration
Rise in right wing politics
EU enlargement
Dynamics of Western nations
September 11
Changing times: forces & factors
“... there was a time, not very long ago at all, when North African diplomats called Britain “Europe’s terrorist heaven” and itsCapital “Londonistan”. Hundreds of veterans of jihad struggles in Afghanistan and North Africa settled in Britain. Whereelse could terrorists Receive housing, unemployment benefit and legal protectionjust by applying for asylum?”
The Economist January 2002Increasing appeal for right-wingpolitics‘Security-led’ immigration policy
anddiscourse
Changing perspective: A quest to redefine the fundamentals?
The UN 1951 Convention Exclusion clause
Deterrence led restrictive policy focusIncreasingly restricted means of entryOff-shore processing in transit centresEthnic profiling, Detention, electronic monitoring, restricted rights, dispersalRediscovering resettlement
Discourse and emerging policy framework
Managed migration The social cohesion agenda:
A move away from multiculturalism Destitution in material welfare Integration a governance challenge of community relation
A human right or positive-contribution argument for immigration?
Does this mean changes in globally and in receiving countries are making refugees ‘visible’ migrants we can do without?
Discourse and emerging policy framework
The debate to be had:
The right for protraction
Citizenship, culture- dynamic?
Immigration control, governance and integration
Discourse and emerging policy framework
A nebulous concept shaped by ideological, political and socio-historical factors
A mutual adaptation process focusing on overcoming the differential disadvantage of refugees.
Integration the concept
Approach
Legal and Political domain
Cultural domain
Social and economic
domain
Individual Individual
rightsLiberal Pluralism
Equal Opportunity
Group
Group rights
Multi-culturalism
Equity / Affirmative
action
Integration- approaches
Historical roots
Dissociation of asylum from integration
Integration policy: Assimilation / multiculturalism
Community/ social cohesionLaissez fare / corporatistThe social cohesion agenda and citizenship
Deterrence led policy
Integration- policy framework
The broad picture: ‘Fear of the unknown’ Perceived/ real pressure on resources and opportunities Socio cultural diversity
How do these translate into immigrant settlement
& integration? Symbolic or cultural integration
Normative cultural homogeneity Notions of ‘majority’ and ‘minority’
Functional- Social and civic integrationResidential IntegrationLinguistic IntegrationLabour Market Integration Educational Integration Civic/Political Integration
Link to Identity & Nationality
Challenges to identity and nationality
For Immigrants
As individuals: Refugees Migrant workers Undocumented
As social groupsIntegration policy and support framework
Interaction with receiving community Length of stay in receiving country
Size of own community
Connection with origin country
Generation
Stage in immigration process
Motive for immigration
Knowledge and skills
Nature of settlement support
Connection with origin country
Challenges to identity and nationality
As individualsValues and perception of identity Experience with migrantsSocio-economic background
As social groupsTraditions of in-ward migrationSocio-economic background, cycleSocio-political orientationNational policy and media
For receiving communities
Challenges to identity and nationality
Possible issues dominating discourse in the coming years:1) What values & approach to migration? Management of destitution and disadvantage Human rights and social justice2) What should the focus of Service delivery for migrant communities be? Ameliorating obstacles
Community led holistic integration
Thank you
Looking forward...