Top Banner
Quick Review: Scale Theories
30

Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Shannon Sims
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Quick Review: Scale Theories

Page 2: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Characteristic Scales: Example

Page 3: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Hierarchy theory: exampleS

patia

l sca

leT

empo

ral s

cale

Landscape

Stand

Gap

Stand Stand

Mechanisms

GapGap

Gap Gap

GapGap

GapGap

Gap

Constraints/boundaries

physiography soil parent materallandscape position

tree physiologyroot respiration

annual productivity

Stand Dynamics:Tree diameters

Spp Composition

Objective: predict forest stand dynamics over 100 years

Page 4: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Hierarchy Theory: Example

soilnutrients

succession

Living and DeadBiomass

Disturbances

CLIMATE and GEOLOGY

productivity

decomposition

competi-tion

Page 5: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Hierarchy Theory: Assignment

For Tuesday, February 1

• Create your own diagram of a system based on hiearchy theory.

• Email your diagrams to me by monday, January 31 @ NOON. Send as either a PowerPoint file or as a *.jpg file.

• I will randomly choose diagrams to discuss. Be prepared to describe your system and your diagram. If you are not randomly chosen, you will be next time!

• Be creative! Feel free to diagram political, social, aquatic, terrestrial, systems. Don’t copy my examples.

Page 6: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic constraints to landscape pattern and

processes

Lecture 4January 27, 2005

Page 7: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Pattern and Process

landscapepattern

non-spatialprocesses

scale

landscapeprocesses

Page 8: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Pattern and ProcessIf a process is NOT a function of pattern, then it is a non-spatial process.

=

If a process is a function of pattern, then it is a spatial, or landscape process.

Page 9: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Landscape ProcessesLandscape Processes are sensitive to landscape pattern because they include the lateral transfer of information, energy, or matter.

Information

Energy

Matter

Page 10: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Landscape ProcessesIf there are no landscape/spatial processes, landscape configuration DOES NOT MATTER.

Other examples of Landscape Processes?

Page 11: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Pattern and Process

landscapepattern

non-spatialprocesses

landscapeprocesses

Abiotic Constraints

Level of Focus for this class

What are the components (explanation)?- Biology- Human activity- Disturbance

Page 12: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

From Urban et al. 1987

Pedogenisis

Climate

Characteristic Scales of Abiotic Constraints

Landform

Page 13: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic Constraints on Landscape Pattern and Function

Climate = long term or prevailing weather affecting the distribution of energy and water in a region

• Temperature• Moisture

Landform = geomorphic features affecting physical relief and soil development

Page 14: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic Constraints: Climate

Climate Definitions

Climate Regime: composite, long-term weather patterns of a region.

Weather: Finer temporal scale changes in temperature, precip, e.g., daily fluctuations

Microclimate: Finer spatial scale differences in temperature and precip, e.g., N and S sides of hill

Page 15: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Climate controls several large scale processes:Hydrologic cycleLandforms and erosion cyclesPlant/animal life cycles and distributionsFire and wind disturbance regimes

From Bailey 1998

Page 16: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Climate and the Hydrologic Cycle

Actual Evapotranspiration (AET) is the quantity of water that is actually removed from a surface due to evaporation and transpiration.

Potential Evapotranspiration (AET) is the maximum water removal possible (w/o control).PET >> AET.

Page 17: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Climate and the Biota

Curtis 1959: Climate and the Wisconsin tension zone

Page 18: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Climate and the Biota Long-term climate change and species distributions

• Distributions of biota have changed due to Milankovich cycles – which appear to be related to glacial/interglacial periods.

• In response, biota may evolve and speciate, migrate, or go extinct.

• Ecotones have shifted drastically in response to long-term climate change, but species respond individualistically,not as communities.

Page 19: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Climate and Disturbance

Direct (Weather):Wind SpeedWind DurationLightening StrikesOverland flowFlood magnitudeFlood duration

Indirect:Fuel QuantityFuel Moisture

Page 20: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic Constraints: Landform

• Next level down in hierarchy of constraints.

• Modifies and is modified by climate.

• Provide the template for disturbance and biotic responses.

Landform

Page 21: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

• Landforms affect water movement and concentration, and soil development differences.

• Topography and gravitational movement of water, and evapotranspiration create a toposequence or catena of soils.

Landforms and Geomorphology

Erosion rates vary with rock type and climate: enough moisture for soil development and vegetative cover?

Page 22: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic Constraints: Landform and Climate Interactions

Landform and climate interact at all scales (continental to landscape to site).

Elevation, aspect, and surface texture interrupt air masses and influence energy input from sunlight, and precipitation and nutrient inputs.

Page 23: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

From Bailey 1998

Example: Greater insolation on south slopes causes warmer sites, greater evapotranspiration.

Landform and Climate Interactions

Page 24: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Example• Robert Whittaker (1952, 1953) sampled vegetation across a

range of montane habitats, spanning elevation and aspect differences.

• Found that species responded individualistically to changing environment.

• But communities could be discerned within environmental space defined by elevational and aspect gradients.

Landform, Climate, and Biota

Page 25: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

From Whittaker 1956

Page 26: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

An extension of landform and climate interactions

Below large scale geomorphology or landform levels.

Landscape position has been shown to be important in causing pattern in many different systems, including systems with relatively little relief.

Abiotic Constraints: Landscape Position

climate andlandform

landscapeposition

Page 27: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Landscape Position and Hydrology

Example:Position of lakes in the northern Wisconsin

Low (Landscape Position) High

Spe

cific

Con

duct

anc

e Northern Lakes, Wisconsin(Kratz et al. 1991)

Page 28: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Landscape Position and DisturbanceLandforms interact with climate and increase or

decrease susceptibility to disturbance. Examples:• Hill slopes may shelter or expose forests to windthrow.• The greater vulnerability of ridges to fire ignition.• Wetlands and lakes in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area that serve as barriers to fire spread.

Page 29: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic Confounding Factors

Direct inferences between the abiotic template and landscape patterns are not always obvious!

•Environmental gradients are correlated and do not always change in concert. For example, temperature and precipitation may be inversely correlated in mountains.

• Physical factors all vary across scales and have their own unique variability across scales.

Landforms

Microclimate

Weather

DecadalClimate

Spatial scale

Tem

po

ral

scal

e

CoarseFine

Long

Short

GlacialClimate

Page 30: Quick Review: Scale Theories. Characteristic Scales: Example.

Abiotic Confounding FactorsDirect inferences between the abiotic template and landscape patterns are not always obvious!

• Biotic responses to physical factors are not always predictable due to differential rates of establishment, growth, mortality.

• Interactions such as competition may confound the relationships.

• Disturbance may alter biotic composition.