QGM 1 Queen’s Global Markets A PREMIER UNDERGRADUATE THINK-TANK Brexit P. Graham, P. Mazurek, G. Randjelovic, S. Robert 10.18.2016 A Reflection & Looking Forward
QGM 1
Queen’s Global MarketsA PREMIER UNDERGRADUATE THINK-TANK
Brexit
P. Graham, P. Mazurek, G. Randjelovic, S. Robert
10.18.2016
A Reflection & Looking Forward
2
AgendaWhat we will be discussing today
1 Social Reasons For Brexit
2 Immediate and Future Economic Impacts
3 Effects on Capital Markets
4 Political Impacts and the Future of the EU
5 Outlook
3
Distrust of Incumbent Politicians
Low Voter Turnout Anxiety Over Immigration
• David Cameron saw a drop in his approval ratings from the moment he approved of the
referendum. His numbers continued to tank until he resigned, making him a very poor figurehead
for the Remain side
- On the other hand, Boris Johnson, the figurehead for Leave, was very popular from his time as
mayor of London
• Polls suggest that the vote succeeded
because of significantly greater turnout for
older generations, shown by Leave districts
being predominantly older
• Globalisation, immigration, and multi-
culturalism were the main issues behind
Leave
- Recent geopolitical events such as the
Paris attacks and June 12th nightclub
shooting gave rise to caution
Sources: YouGov, IFS, The Independent, BBC
Society Before BrexitA Complete Collapse in Trust of Leadership
4
David Cameron Boris Johnson
Politicians Out of Favour“Remain” Activists Were Out, “Leave” Activists Were In
Sources: YouGov, The Independent, BBC, ComRes
• Set the groundwork for the referendum in
late 2015
- Set the official date in February 2016
• Campaigned heavily for Remain as a
figurehead of the pro-EU movement
• Significant drops in approval and trust
ratings leading up to the referendum
• Extremely popular mayor of London from
2008-2016
- Campaigned as a figurehead for Leave,
alongside politicians like Nigel Farage
- 45% of Britons believed he told the truth
about the EU Referendum, compared to
Cameron’s 21%
20
30
40
50
60
70
15/05/2015 12/6/2015 10/7/2015 27/10/2015 15/01/2016
David Cameron Approval
Approval Disapproval
20
30
40
50
60
70
19/4/2013 8/4/2014 13/08/2014 18/12/2014
Boris Johnson Approval
Approval Disapproval
5
Why People Voted Leave Who Voted Leave
The Issues & The TurnoutImmigration, Globalization, Liberalism At the Heart of Leave
Sources: Lord Ashcroft Polls
• Exit polling run by Lord Ashcroft Polling
provides data on why people voted to Leave
• The likelihood of voting for Brexit if you
strongly disliked one of the following terms:
- Multi-culturalism (39% disliked): 81%
- Social liberalism (35% disliked): 80%
- Immigration (54% disliked): 80%
- Environmentalism (26% disliked): 78%
- Feminism (22% disliked): 74%
- The Internet (6% disliked): 71%
- Globalization (36% disliked): 69%
- Capitalism (43% disliked): 51%
0
20
40
60
80
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Votes By Age Group
Leave Remain
0
20
40
60
80Votes by Race/Religion
Leave Remain
6
Wealth Transfers to Other Countries Sovereignty
European Economic IntegrationVoter’s Frustrations With The Single Market
Sources: Bloomberg
• Poor economic performance of the
European Union (EU) and concerns about
wealth transfers to other EU countries:
- In 2015 the UK paid £ 13 billion (C$20
billion) to the EU and received £ 4.5
billion (C$ 7 billion)
- Wealth and employment disparity
between member states
• Maastricht Treaty of 1992 transferred
powers from parliaments to Brussels
• Free movement and immigration – the EU
requires that member countries allow the
free movement of factors of production
(including labour)
- Net migration into the UK was 330,000
people in 2015, which the Leave
campaign argues is far too high (their
target is less than a third of this total)
• Refugee crisis only added to these fears
-2.00%
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
Mar
-10
Jul-
10
No
v-1
0
Mar
-11
Jul-
11
No
v-1
1
Mar
-12
Jul-
12
No
v-1
2
Mar
-13
Jul-
13
No
v-1
3
Mar
-14
Jul-
14
No
v-1
4
Mar
-15
Jul-
15
No
v-1
5
Mar
-16
YoY GDP Growth Rates
UK Eurozone
7
The Tradeoff
An Uncertain Future
Have the Cake and Eat It?Britain Will Have to Choose Between Sovereignty and Trade
Sources: The Financial Times
• Norwegian model – no participation in
political structures but access to the EU
market. Pay into the EU budget and accept
free movement of people
• Swiss model – arrangements governed by a
number of bi-lateral agreements which
results in access of EU market for most
sectors of the economy. Contributes to EU
budget and accepts free movement of
people
• Canadian model – Comprehensive Economic
and Trade Agreement (CETA), when signed,
allows Canada preferential access to EU for most
economic sectors, without financial commitments
or free movement of people
• Hard Brexit – no preferential access to EU market
and no political commitment. Relationship would
be governed by World Trade Organization rules
• The future impact of Brexit is unknown. Theresa May, the new UK Prime Minister says she submit
Article 50, which triggers Brexit by March 2017. The UK and the EU then have two years to
negotiate a new arrangement
• Overall the effect of Brexit on the economy will be negative: limiting trade and the supply of
labour will have a negative impact on the economy
- Just how bad the impact will be will depend on the severity of Brexit
8
The Balance of Payments A Depressed Pound Gives an Opportunity to Eliminate a Long Standing Current Account
Deficit
Sources: The Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-6%
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
Jan
-88
Mar
-89
May
-90
Jul-
91
Sep
-92
No
v-9
3
Jan
-95
Mar
-96
May
-97
Jul-
98
Sep
-99
No
v-0
0
Jan
-02
Mar
-03
May
-04
Jul-
05
Sep
-06
No
v-0
7
Jan
-09
Mar
-10
May
-11
Jul-
12
Sep
-13
Current Account as a Percentage of GDP
Short-Term Impacts
Long-Term Impacts Current Account as a Percentage of GDP
How to Capitalize
• Uncertainty creating volatile financial
markets
• Risk of decrease in GDP and increase in
inflation
• A depressed pound will create an
environment where exports are cheaper
• Britain must find a competitive advantage in
the long term to export
• Britain cannot believe that they can
completely sidestep the EU
• Unless Britain finds a good substitute to the
trade that the EU provided, they will likely
be be sustaining lower growth in the long
term
• Britain must also be very careful in how it
limits its immigration – the possibility of a
demographic crisis does exist
9
FX and Equity Market Reactions – Timeline
Market Reaction to BrexitA harsh sell-off met with an aggressive buying opportunity
Sources: Bloomberg, Financial Times, Economist, The Telegraph
• Uncertainty: discouraging, portfolio flows, inward
investment, and domestic firm investment
• UK current account: reduced net capital inflows
• Loss of single market: more costly to sell goods and
services to Europe, reducing the demand for sterling
at Europeans will consequently buy less
• Reduced growth expectations; potential rate cut
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
1.30
1.35
1.40
1.45
1.50
1.55
1-Feb-16 1-Apr-16 1-Jun-16 1-Aug-16 1-Oct-16
GBP/USD FTSE Index
February 20: Date of
referendum
announced
April 3: Vote Leave
announced as official
campaign
May 27: Purdah
Starts1
June 7: Deadline to
register to vote
June 23: GBP/USD closes at 1.4877
(94% of 52 week high)
June 23/24: Polling
day / National
declaration of
referendum result
October 18: GBP/USD
closes at 1.2293 (17%
below June 23rd level)
Pound Sell-off Market Rebound
• FTSE 100: 70% of companies revenues within the
index is derived abroad, increasing profitability
• Dramatic sell-off: Investors saw bargain
opportunities in many constituents
• FTSE 100 masks the strain on the underlying
fundamentals of the domestic economy
‒ Is about flat on a currency adjusted basis
10
Continued Volatility Recent political developments have, for the time being, broken a long-standing
relationship between Sterling and gilts
Sources: Bloomberg, The Telegraph, BoE
Increased Downward Pressure
Historical Relationship Between Sterling and Gilts
Central Bank Intervention
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
18-Oct-13 18-Jul-14 18-Apr-15 18-Jan-16 18-Oct-16
10Y Gilt Yield GBP/USD
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
20-Jun-16 30-Jul-16 8-Sep-16 18-Oct-16
October 18th, 2013 – August 31st, 2015:
R2 = 0.89
Around October 1st, relationship between
Gilt yields and the Sterling dramatically
becomes inverse
• After stabilizing briefly after Brexit, the sterling
continued to sell off after warning of “hard Brexit” or
“no Brexit” from EU President, Donald Tusk
• Theresa May identified two main constraints to EU
negotiations:
1. Controlling migration
2. Ending European Court of Justice jurisdiction
• The previously inverse relationship between Gilts
and the sterling recently flipped to a parallel sell-off
• Debt markets and the sterling initially reacted to the
25 bps rate cut from the BoE immediately after Brexit
• The falling sterling has lead to a bond market sell-off
as returns are slashed for overseas investors
accompanied by a dramatic pickup in inflation
11
Historical Probability of a Rate Hike at December Meeting
Where to Look?Investors are quick to price-in market expectations upon release of an additional data
point
Sources: Bloomberg, Financial Times, BoE
Increased Inflation Eyes on the BoE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1-Jan-15 4-Apr-15 6-Jul-15 7-Oct-15 8-Jan-16 10-Apr-16 12-Jul-16 13-Oct-16
(%)
Probability of rate > 0.25
Probability of rate = 0.25
Probability of rate < 0.25
90%
10%
• Inflation rose 1% in September, the biggest rise in
two years and up from 0.6% the previous month
• Reducing pressure on extremely loose monetary
policy as the BoE may have less incentive to cut
interest rates and extend the gilt purchase scheme
• Current account deficit may also play a role as market
participants push the U.K.’s cost of debt upwards
• Lack of cohesion between the BoE and the Prime
Minister’s office only provides more reason for
uncertainty within markets
• Combination of a “hard Brexit” with extremely
relaxed monetary policy in detrimental to the sterling
– Can potentially act as a self-inflicting cycle
12
Impact on Major Political Parties
UKIP Scotland
• Theresa May’s faction represents a slim majority – 58% of Tories voted to Leave
- Staunch, nationalist fueled divide mirrors GOP internal conflict in the wake of the Trump
campaign, may fuel party instability and potentially weaken party positions
• Majority of Labour supporters voted Remain, albeit not overwhelmingly – 63% vs 37%
- Lab leader Jeremy Corbyn has been ambivalent towards Brexit and emphasizes moving on
- No strong movement to revise or abandon the vote
• Brexit: UKIP’s raison d’être?
• UKIP seeks to position itself as a mainstream
European far-right populist party
• Large leadership upheaval following
resignation of long-time leader Farage
• Impact of vote on party popularity is
uncertain – depends on voter attitudes
• Scotland voted remain 62%-38%
- SNP supporters voted remain 64%-36%
• Brexit represents “violation of agreements
made by UK government post
independence referendum”
• SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon is committed to
pushing independence in face of vote
Sources: BBC, Bloomberg, The Guardian, The Independent
Domestic Political ImplicationsLeadership and party shifts
13
Euroscepticism The Periphery
European Political ImplicationsDiscord across the continent
Sources: Al Jazeera, BBC, BFP, Europa, London School of Economics, Pew Research Institute
• Euroskepticism on the rise
- Part of increase in popularity of far-right
national movements with similar appeal
• Brexit precedent may spur further broad
increases in Euroskepticism
• Future growth of Euroskepticism in face of
more migrants and poor economy
• EU viewed more positively amongst
“periphery nations”
• Emerging economies dependent on EU
• Inter EU immigrants face challenges
moving forward
• Potentially beneficial towards EU
candidates
14
Nationalist Right in the West
Nationalism Globally
• Implications of successful nationalism have potential to fuel similar movements across the West
- Brexit symbolic of those shunning thinned political spectrum in Europe and North America
• Growing opposition to globalization and it’s chief tenets
- Low western approval of immigration despite continued high levels of migrant flow
- Protectionist measures increasingly popular among western workers
Sources: The Economist, Forbes, Huffington Post
Global Political ImplicationsFear of a globalized planet
• Implementation of nationalist policies and nationalist-oriented leaders throughout the world
- Ruling parties in countries such as Japan, Russia, India, Philippines describe themselves as
nationalist
• Part of a shift in global conservative politics and traditionalist politics
- Greater tendency towards nationalism, national integrity and authoritarianism
- Weaker support of classical conservative and libertarian ideas