Quantum Gravity and Gravity Control

Quantum Gravity and Gravity Control

Lucian M. Ionescu

Abstract

Quantizing the qubit space, i.e. the SU2 gauge group, yields the Platonic solids as fundamental

states. They correspond to triplets of flavored quarks, in duality. The structure of the positive electric

charge of the proton, and of the neutral neutron in first approximation, is claimed to yield Gravity as

a residual force. The ensuing breaking the isotropy symmetry allows for the use of Dynamical

Nuclear Orientation to control the gravitational potential and hence inertial mass, the corresponding

effective charge. This Gravity theory in a thermodynamic formulation was first proposed and tested

by Dr. Frederick Alzofon in the 1980s. The above foundations based on the SM were added only

recently by the author. Moreover, the current Standard Model gauge group U(1) x SU(2) x SU(3) is

just a “blow-up” of the local parameterization of SU(2) viewed as a Hopf fibration (see Piotr

Zenczyhowski, Elementary particles and Emergent Phase Space). This approach leads to a true

unification of “fundamental” interactions. The ppp presents the main idea in a simple and intuitive

way. For additional insights see the author’s recent preprints.

Prof.Dr.LucianM.IonescuDepartmentofMathematics

IllinoisStateUniversity,Normal,IL

PleasesupportKickstarterProjectGravityTheoryandControl:https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/virequest/62358340/edit/previewVIRequest– GravityProject

TakeHomeContent

-EM/GChargeshavestructureinStandardModel

-GravityemergesasadeformationofElectroweakTheory

-ARelativisticUnifiedFieldTheoryisathand…

-Experiments:Alzofon(1970’s)and…(1990’s)

EMCHARGESHaveStructure!(ThisistheMainPoint)

� Protonsp+(uud)andNeutronsn0(udd)aremadeofquarks:upuand“downquark”d.

� ElementaryCHARGES:Q(up)=+2/3&Q(down)=-1/3…that’sit![Antimatter:ONLYinhighenergyprocesses]

� QuarkFlavorscorrespondtoPlatonicSymmetry/Solids;up/downflavorscorrespondtoTetrahedralSymmetry[TOIgroups&fundamentalgeometries]

� Matterconstituentsp+,e-,n0haveUnifiedVectorFieldsofINDEXES:(++-),(---),(+--)

� ThemutualinteractionsyieldEMandGravity!

Abriefrecap…

QuarkFlavorsandNuclei[seeMoon’sModelandNormanCook:anotherstory!]

� Picturep+(uud)andn0(udd)as3D-bubbles,

ande-asanorbitalcloudratherthanapoint!

� NucleihaveFaceCenteredCubicsymmetry,andgrowlikecrystals,withvariousorientationsoftheG-axis.

WhyGravityEmerges[Einstein’sRicciTensorvs.VFIndex]

� GRusesdeformationsofthemetric:

Ricij–Rgij=GTij

[“departurefromaconformalmetricisduetoanisotropyofmatter”]

Themoderninteractiontheories(QFT)usepropagators.

� The“Elevatorjustification”ofusingRiccitensorcanberepeatedforp+,e-,n0andGravityemergesasadeformationofEM(skippingdetails:seeupcomingarticle):

�  p(uud)= (+,+,+)–(0,0,+)(PerturbationofCoulombfield)

� HencepSM=2p+EM-gXYG (EMandGravitationfields)

asanticipatedbyPaulLaViolette’sSubquantumKinetics.

Neutron,Electronand…isthe

NeutrinorelatedtotheGraviton?!

�  Similarly,fortheneutron:

n(ddu)= (-1,-1,+2)= (---)+(00+)=e-SM+gXYG

reminiscentoftheBetaDecayoftheneutron:

n0->p++e-+νe νe<-?->gXYGIsthereaconnectionbetweenneutrinoandgraviton?

� TheEinstein’selevatoranalysisoftheinteractionofthreechargescanbecomparedwiththeRiccicurvaturepictureofGR.Upon“zoomingout”ityieldsaclassicalpictureofaUnifiedVectorFieldwiththeabovementionedtypesofindexes:(3,0),(2,1),(1,2)and(0,3).

FromElectroweaktoQubitModel

andbeyondtoQuantumGravity�  SoGravityisadeformationoftheElectroweakTheory(EM:U(1)inQubitModelSU(2)withSU(3)as“GaloisGroup”vs.WeinbergangletoembedU(1)inU1xSU2),neutrino(fermion)lookslikeacandidateforthegraviton(boson)…whataboutmassivebosonsW,Z?

� DeformationsofanSU(2)theorycanbeachievedbyquantizationinadirectmanner:FINITEsubgroups(DoublesofthePlatonicTOIgroups)andviaDrinfelddoubles…[Projectfornextsummer!]

…backtoconsequences…

TheUnifiedFieldTheory[RelaUvisUcand“hiding”theSMquarkstructure]

The“zoom-out”ofstructureofcharges,suggestsaneasyrelativisticUnifiedFieldTheoryresultsmathematically:

�  TheUnifiedFieldhassourcesofindexes(3,0),(2,1)…(0,3);

�  Thefieldofmovingcharges(currents)areobtainedviaaLorentztransformation:magnetismB(duetoE)andaCoriolis/Magnetic-likefieldC(duetoG);

�  ThetestprobedynamicsinsuchaUnifiedFieldsatisfiesNetwton-LorentzForceLaw:

FNewton-Lorentz=(E+iG)+Vx(B+iC)

wheretheLorentztransformoftheGravitypartyieldsananalogofmagneticfieldC:Gravito-Dynamics!

[Complexstructure“i”extension:1storderdeformationparameter“h”]

TheUnifiedField

Non-Commuta*ve“Coulomb”LawApairofUnifiedFieldsourcesofgeneralindexesQ(likep+

SMandn0

SM),produceastatic(chargeatrest)fieldforceFUFsatisfyinganon-commutativeQuantum“CoulombLaw”

whereQ,Q’arematricesrepresentingcharges(so3Liealgebragenerators/”quarks”),averagingoverdirectionsU.

ItisadeformationofthecommutativeproductofEM-chargesq=Tr(Q)(likee-EMandp

+EM)withGtheGravitational

couplingconstantasadeformationparameterTheQ*Q’twotermsareEMandGforces[Rel.mass/QTBD]

EUF (Q,Q ') =1

r2

Q *SO(3)∫ UQ 'dU , Q*Q ' = qq '+G [Q,Q ']SO(3)

TheMainPoint:DirecUons!ThisNC-CoulombLawassumes“chaotic”orientationsofthenucleonsinmatter;i.e.fortwobodieswithNandN’numberofnucleons,theUFtotalforceisadoublesumovernucleonsniandnj:

FUF=Sumij1/r2<Qi|Uij|Qj>

wheretheCoulombLawtermplaystheroleofapropagatorinQFT[1/r2istheusualGreenfunction].

Whenaveragingoverdirections,itshouldyieldtheusualtwoforcesEEM(Coulomb)andFG(Newton):

[ThematrixQshouldbeacombinationofchargesandquarkmasses…]

EUF (Q,Q ') =1

r2

Q *SO(3)∫ UQ 'dU = EEM +FG

NoteontheHistoryLooking“back”andstudyingpriorattempts,IcameacrossFranzMariaUlrichTheodorHochAepinus(1724-1802)whosuggestedthattheattractiveforcesbetweentwounchargedbodiesmightbeveryslightlygreaterthantherepulsiveforces,andthatthisdifferencemightbethecauseofgravitation.

…Itrefersprobably(n.a.)totheelectricforcesduetothenegativeandpositiveelectricchargesthatotherwiseoccurinequalamounts,asasum(neutralbody);ifso,hegotitquiteright!!

-  Experiments:-  1)GravityDynamics

-  2)NuclearOrientation

-  Implementations

ExperimentinGravitoDynamics:DezsőSarkadi,GravitybetweenarUficiallymovedmasses

Gvs.EMforEngineers!

ThetworesonantCIRCUITscanbeeffectivelymodeledforEngineeringpurposesusingelementsofcircuit:RLC-Model:

Take-HomeProject:Reproducetheexperiment!(Volunteers?)

[RLC-TheoryforLABExperiments:TBA@nextConference!)

ExperimentsinNuclearOrientaUon(seeFrederick&DavidAlzofonTheoryfordetails)

�  F.Alzofon,Ph.D.advancedanexplanationofGravityControlsince1970s,basedontheideaofDynamicNuclearOrientation.

�  Itisan“effectivemodel”,withoutanexplanationwhyorientationmatters,yetTESTEDandCONFIRMEDinanexperimentdoneinthe1970s[Therearealsocritiquesagainst,asalways…]

� The“effectivemodel”treatsGravityPotentialasheatpotential(harmonicfunction),andsuggestsitscontrolviaamicrowavepulsingprocedure,similartocoolingusingamagneticfield.

GravityControlviaDynamic

NuclearOrientaUon(DNO)� Theexplanationisnowclear:thenucleonsinanucleushavea“fineenergylevelsplitting”duetotheanisotropyofcharge:n0(udd)andp+(uud),whichyieldsa“G-Forcemonopole”(preferreddirection).

� Themicrowavepulsingexcitationofamaterial,inamagneticfieldissimilartotheprocessinLASERs,leadingtoinversionofapopulationofstates.ActsontheelectronSPINatLarmourfrequency,andviaspin-orbital-nuclearmagneticmomentcoupling,“tilts”thenucleusthe“preferred”way[Totheexcitedhigherenergystate],inhibitingtheGravitationalcomponent.

ExperimentalConfirmaUon�  Dr.Alzofonmeasuredtheweightdecreaseofanaluminumprobe(withimpurities),subjecttomicrowavepulsesoffrequency,verifyingthatDNOallowstocontrolgravity.

�  TheparametersusedintheexperimentwerethoserecordedbyaUSAFairplaneequipedwithspecializedmeasurementequipment,duringanencounterwithaUFO[seeDavidAlzofon’sbookfordetails].

�  The“unbiasedcritique”ofDavidPrutchi,Ph.D.doesnotholdunderalogicscrutiny.

� The“coolingmodel”isagoodeffectivetheory,butitneedsinputfromTheoryofNucleibyDr.Moon/JacksonEarl&L.M.I.andFCCmodelbyNormanCook–condensedmatter/nuclearphysics!]

Dia/Para/Pro-GraviUsm…

� Paraphrasingmagneticproperties:dia/para/feromagneticmaterials,susceptibleofvariouslevelsofmagnetization.

� Magnetizationisduetoacoherent,combinedsuperpositionofindividualmagneticmomentsoftheindividualelectrons.

� Asimilarbehaviorisexpectedfrommaterials,withrespectwithDNO;somematerialsmaybecome“permanentG-anisotropic”(Grabennikov’sstory)andothersrequireEM-fieldandRotation(JohnSEARL),tomagneticmomentsoforientnuclei.

FurtherR&DregardingDNO

� AnindepthunderstandingofDNOrequiresrelatingitwithmagneticresonance(MRI)![SeeCarsonJeffries,DynamicNuclearOrientation;C.E.Byvik,Spin-TemperatureTheoryofDynamicNuclearPolarizationetc.]

� AbetterknowledgeofSolidStatePhysicsisneeded!

� ReplicationofDr.FrederickAlzofonexperimentisneeded!![butno“assuming”,“Ibelieve”etc.towards

“debunking”it;usingapositivemindsetandcreativeattitude]

StaUcversusDynamicOrientaUon

� ThetwomajortechniquestoachievenuclearorientationareSTATICorDYNAMIC.

� TheyallowtobuildGravityControlDevices,e.g.conformGrebennikov(“static”)andSearl(“dynamic”).

WewillbrieflylookatdynamicapproachestogravitycontrolinvolvingEMandGcoupling.

DuetoROTATIONofmass(G-current)ANDmovingelectriccharges(E-current),theynecessitateananalysiswhichismorecomplicated… [notclearatthistime!]

CouplingEMandGravito-Dynamics

�  ForhighpoweredspacetraveloneneedstotakeadvantageofthecouplingbetweenEMandGravity.

�  JohnSearl’sEffect/Generator:Itisnotyetcleartotheauthorhowitfunctions,butinvolvesafeedbackloop(over-unityaspect)andEM-Gcoupling.

� A.Chekurkov’sGravilladeandRusselAndersonreplicaarerecentsimilarversions:Similarly,thereprobablyisafeedbackinvolved,togetherwiththeEM-Gcoupling(Conf.UFTchargestructure).

Further“SpeculaUons”and

HistoricalAccountsofLevitaUon

Thereare“mixed”approachestoGravityControl,notinvolvingrotationandmagneticfields,achievingDNOviavarious“deliverymethods”:

�  LevitationviaAcousticStimulation:Tibetanmonks,Leedskalnin…(etc.)

�  Microwaveexcitations:Hutchinsoneffect,consistingofavarietyofstructuraleffectsinmaterials,includinglevitation(unfortunatelythelackofascientificapproach,ledtoatotallackofdocumentationANDimpossibilitytoreproducetheeffectsondemand).

TheAmazingHumanPotenUal!

Atatotallydifferentlevel,i.e.non-technological,gravitycontrolseemstobeattainablebyhumans(forgetSupermanJ),whileintrance,meditationorwhen“gettingintheZone”(sportives,ballerinasetc.):

�  IndianGuru/Yogapractitioners(notthecheaters);

� Magicians/mediums(D.D.Homeetc.)

�  FamousSaints(St.Cupertinoetc.)

� BallerinaAnnaPavlovna;dancerVaslavNijinsky

� Basketballplayers:M.Jordonetc.(50”inplay-mode)

PartyLevitaUon:Isthere“diagraviUsm”?

Diamagneticmaterialsarerepelledbymagneticfields.Isthereananalogforgravitationalfields?

Let’sfollowChildress’AGbookonPartyLevitation[Laterintheevening,havefuntoo:anyvolunteers?]…

� OrienttheQuadrupoleHumanAntenna:1)45ooffcardinalpoints;2)Alternatingmale/female.

� Polarizing/chargingthesubject:1)Stackhandsontheheadoflevitee(L1..4;R1..4);

2)Coordinatorcountsdown:10..1(charging)the4,placepointersunderthearmpits&knees,thenlift.

Note:arecentattemptbytheauthorfailedmiserably![seeUriGeller’sdemonstrationonYT…]

Magnets,BlochWall&uudIndex

Whatisgoingon?First,theFLOWthatisessential,isthatofthevectorpotentialA(itscurlisB,the“M-forcefield”)…

Next,itisworthstudyingthearticlebyRichardLeforsClark,Ph.D.onDiamagneticGravityVortexes,inD.H.Childress’bookonA-Gandworldgrid:

�  Diagram6,p.63:theA-flowofthemagnethasa“broken8”wavezone,andthedirectionsoftheflowatthecriticalpointcorrespondtoatypical(2,1)-indextype,e.g.thatofthe(uup)ofaproton…

�  Clark’sexplanationalludestoseveralaspectsregardingGravity,mentionedearlierhere,andrelatedtotheQubitModel/StandardModel!…(TBC)

UriGeller’sHandgrowingDemo

Atfirstitmightseemunrelated…butweknowunificationrequires“zooming-out”:openingourmindsinorderto“OpenOurReality”…

� UriGeller(andKulagina,Anastasia,etc.)demonstratedhowto“ignite”aseedintosproutingasmallplant,inhispalm,withoutwateroranythingelse…visible;)

�  Itisshootingchithroughyourfingers(Gellerusedhispointer);“sword-fingers”issuchaTai-Chimove(alsocreatingachi-balletc.–seeRobertPeng’sdemos).

TheCircleofLife![FromEthericA-flowtoQi=Q.Info.&Biofields]

� Partylevitationworksbetterifopeninghandschakras(bubblingwells),andifYOUNGchildrenareperformingtheexperiment(evenonold&heavyadults).

� Briefly,theEMvectorpotentialA-flow,wasthecentralconceptinMaxwell’sTheory(etc.).CentralinAharonov-Bohmexperiment(etc.).

WhattheancientChinesecalledchi,Japanise/qi,IndianBuddhists/prana,Christians/HolySpiritetc.

�  SeeL.M.IonescuTESLAtalkson“Teslawaves,BiofieldsandEthericEnergy”,2013&“QuantumInformation,TeslawavesandBiofields”,2015(!?).

…let’sseeitsrelevancetotheStructuralCavityEffect…

BacktoLevitaUon:Bugsdoit!

�  Grebennikovused“Naturemadecavorite”(H.G.Wells:termforasubstancethatnegatesgravity):wingsofsomebeatles,buildinghis“flyingboard”.

�  Themicro-structureofthewingsseemtobeessentialforobtainingtheeffect.

�  GrebennikovnotedtheStructuralCavityEffectashavinghealthrelatedbeneficialeffect(periodicstructureslikebee-hivesetc.).

�  Theobviousconclusion:A-flowcontrolvialattices(bee-hive,cloudbuster,pyramid,bugwingsetc.)enablestoControlGravity,directly(levitation)orviaadevice(board->UFO).

� MyClaim:it’sduetoStatic/DynamicNuclearOrientation!

ToDoList(“homework”)�  DevelopNewton-LorentzGravitodynamics(Theory)�  ReproducetheGravityInductionExperiment(Lab).�  ExperimentofDr.FrederickAlzofon:playwithit!

[RelatewithwhatHutchinsonisdoing…?]

�  ExperimentswithSCE(e.g.pyramideffect)andstudytheconnectionwithA/qi-flow;effectondynamic/staticweight?

�  Trainyourself!�  InvestigateShaolinMartialArtsforjumptrainingtechniques,

accountsetc.�  Studytheeffectofmeditationonyourabilities�  Learnto“Get-in-the-Zone”!�  TryreplicatingUriGeller’sexperiments!

�  Educateothers&Network!

Bibliography[Toconsultforfurtherdetails]

�  L.M.Ionescu:

2020AUnifiedFieldTheoryapproachtoGravityControl,

2019QubitModel:APlatonicandExceptionalTheory,

2011Super-symmetry,anti-gravityandfreeenergy

�  FrederickAlzofonandDavidAlzofon:GravityControlwithPresentTechnology

�  SeeVictorGrebennikovandStructuralCavityEffect

�  SeeHutchinsoneffectetc.

� VIRequest– GravityProject–website