Quantitative measurement of specific biomarkers for protein oxidation, nitration and glycation in Arabidopsis leaves Ulrike Bechtold 1,* , Naila Rabbani 1,2 , Philip M. Mullineaux 1 and Paul J. Thornalley 1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK, and 2 Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, University Hospital, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK Received 14 January 2009; revised 13 March 2009; accepted 7 April 2009. *For correspondence (fax +44 1206 872595; e-mail [email protected]). SUMMARY Higher plants are continually exposed to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species during their lives. Together with glucose and reactive dicarbonyls, these can modify proteins spontaneously, leading to protein oxidation, nitration and glycation. These reactions have the potential to damage proteins and have an impact on physiological processes. The levels of protein oxidation, nitration and glycation adducts were assayed, using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, in total leaf extracts over a diurnal cycle and when exposed to conditions that promote oxidative stress. Changes in the levels of oxidation, glycation and nitration adducts were found between the light and dark phases under non-stress conditions. A comparison between wild-type plants and a mutant lacking peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase (pmsr2-1) showed increased protein oxidation, nitration and glycation of specific amino acid residues during darkness in pmsr2-1. Short-term excess light exposure, which promoted oxidative stress, led to increased protein glycation, specifically by glyoxal. This suggested that any increased oxidative damage to proteins was within the repair capacity of the plant. The methods developed here provide the means to simultaneously detect a range of protein oxidation, nitration and glycation adducts within a single sample. Thus, these methods identify a range of biomarkers to monitor a number of distinct biochemical processes that have an impact on the proteome and therefore the physiological state of the plant. INTRODUCTION The proteome of plants is continually subjected to attack by reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide anion radicals, hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), singlet oxygen and the hydroxyl radicals. Amino acid residues undergo oxidative modifications, with sulfur-containing amino acids being particularly susceptible. Cysteine thiols are oxidized to glu- tathione-mixed disulfides, sulfenic and sulfinic acid deriva- tives, while methionine residues are oxidized to methionine sulfoxide (MetSO, Figure 1). Tyrosine residues are oxidized to dityrosine (Figure 1), and tryptophan residues are oxi- dized to N-formylkynurenine (NFK, Figure 1) (Simat and Steinhart, 1998; Dro ¨ ge, 2002; Møller and Kristensen, 2006). Oxidative modification may change and impair the function of the protein, and target oxidized proteins for proteasomal or lysosomal destruction (Davies, 1993; Grune et al., 1997). Oxidative damage to proteins has been implicated in chan- ges in gene expression, growth and development, and senescence (Lander et al., 1997; Wautier and Schmidt, 2004; Feechan et al., 2005; Unterluggauer et al., 2008). The enzy- matic and non-enzymatic anti-oxidant systems of plants suppress oxidative damage to proteins, but repair of pro- teins is also an indispensable function in plants (Bechtold et al., 2004; Romero et al., 2004). For example, plant peptide MetSO reductase (PMSR) removes MetSO residues in pro- teins by reducing them to methionine (Boschi-Muller et al., 2005; Hansel et al., 2005; Weissbach et al., 2005), and it has been shown previously that loss of one isoform of PMSR in Arabidopsis thaliana had a detrimental effect on both metabolism and plant growth (Bechtold et al., 2004). The plant proteome is also exposed continually to reactive nitrogen species (RNS) such as nitric oxide (NO), peroxy- nitrite and related RNS. These are highly reactive signalling molecules that rapidly diffuse and permeate membranes (Durner et al., 1998; Neill et al., 2003). In plants, peroxynitrite has generally been regarded as the side product of a scavenging reaction to control levels of NO (Van Camp et al., 1998). In animals, peroxynitrite is a strong oxidizing agent and hence a precursor of the oxidation adducts ª 2009 The Authors 1 Journal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Plant Journal (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03898.x
11
Embed
Quantitative measurement of specific biomarkers for protein oxidation, nitration and glycation in Arabidopsis leaves
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Quantitative measurement of specific biomarkers for proteinoxidation, nitration and glycation in Arabidopsis leaves
Ulrike Bechtold1,*, Naila Rabbani1,2, Philip M. Mullineaux1 and Paul J. Thornalley1,2
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK, and2Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, University Hospital,
Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
Received 14 January 2009; revised 13 March 2009; accepted 7 April 2009.
Total leaf protein extract was prepared from 5-week-old plants. Thelevel of detection is expressed as the minimum and maximum levelsdetected throughout a diurnal cycle in terms of mmol per mol ofunmodified amino acid.
0
10
20
30
40
50
Diurnal time (h)
Met
SO
(m
mo
l mo
l met
–1)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
8 13 16 0 68 13 16 0 6
8 13 16 0 6 8 13 16 0 6
Diurnal time (h)
NF
K (
mm
ol m
ol t
rp–1
)
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
Diurnal time (h)
Dit
yro
sin
e (m
mo
l mo
l tyr
–1)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Diurnal time (h)
3-N
T (
mm
ol m
ol t
yr–1
)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 3. Protein oxidation and nitration adduct
residues in total leaf extracts of wild-type and
pmsr2-1 throughout a diurnal cycle.
Plant tissue was harvested from 5-week-old
plants over a 24 h period, and total protein
extracts were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis
followed by LC/MS-MS.
(a) MetSO, (b) NFK, (c) dityrosine and (d) 3-NT.
The open and closed bars on top of the garphs
indicate the light and dark periods, respectively.
Key: black squares, wild-type control; open
squares, pmsr2-1 mutant. Data are means �SEM (n = 3).
Protein damage in Arabidopsis 5
ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03898.x
both wild-type and pmsr2-1 (Figure 3a and Figure 4d).
MG-derived MG-H1 residues were the AGE that showed
the highest content in the Arabidopsis proteome, at approx-
imately 2 mmol mol)1 Arg (Figure 4f). The contents of other
MG-derived AGE residue, CEL (Figure 4e) and MOLD (Fig-
ure 4h), were approximately 10- and 400-fold lower than
this, respectively. All the AGE residues, except for CML,
tended to show oscillatory diurnal behaviour, whereby
maximal residue contents occurred in the middle of the
light and dark periods. The G-H1 and CMA residue contents
of the pmsr2-1 mutant tended to be higher than the wild-
type control in both the light and dark periods (Figure 4c,d).
The content of other AGE residues, however, was little
changed in pmsr2-1 compared to the wild-type control.
Exposure to short-term excess light stress
Exposure to short-term excess light stress leads to the over-
reduction of components of photosynthetic electron trans-
port, and therefore to increases in thermal dissipation and
potentially damage of the light-harvesting complex of pho-
tosystem II (PSII) (Baker, 2008). Inhibition of photosynthetic
electron transport can result in the production of ROS in the
chloroplast, mainly via the reduction of O2 in the Mehler
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
8 13 16 0 6Diurnal time (h)
GO
LD
(m
mo
l mo
l lys
–1)
0
5
10
15
8 13 16 0 6Diurnal time (h)
FL
(m
mo
l mo
l lys
–1)
0
2
4
6
8
8 13 16 0 6Diurnal time (h)
CM
L (
mm
ol m
ol l
ys–1
)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Diurnal time (h)
G-H
1 (m
mo
l mo
l arg
–1)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
8 13 16 0 68 13 16 0 6Diurnal time (h)
CM
A (
mm
ol m
ol a
rg–1
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Diurnal time (h)
CE
L (
mm
ol m
ol l
ys–1
)
0
1
2
3
8 13 16 0 68 13 16 0 6Diurnal time (h)
MG
-H1
(mm
ol m
ol a
rg–1
)
0.000
0.005
0.010
8 13 16 0 6Diurnal time (h)
MO
LD
(m
mo
l mo
l lys
–1)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
Figure 4. Protein glycation adduct residues in
total leaf extracts of wild-type and pmsr2-1
throughout a diurnal cycle.
Plant tissue was harvested from 5-week-old
plants over a 24 h period, and total protein
extracts were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis,
followed by LC/MS-MS. (a) FL, (b) CML, (c) G-H1,
(d) CMA, (e) CEL, (f) MG-H1, (g) GOLD, (h) MOLD.
The open and closed bars on top of the graphs
indicate the light and dark periods, respectively.
Key: black squares, wild-type control; open
squares, pmsr2-1 mutant. Data are means �SEM (n = 3).
6 Ulrike Bechtold et al.
ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03898.x
stress, particularly for components of the glyoxalase system
(Thornalley, 1993; Singla-Pareek et al., 2003).
In summary, in this paper, we describe methods that can
quantify specific damage to the proteome of Arabidopsis by
glycation, oxidation and nitration. The presence of AGEs,
oxidation and nitration products in non-stressed plants, their
diurnal pattern, and the selectivity towards certain adducts
during stress suggests that protein modifications may not
merely be unintentional damage. There is clear evidence
that protein modifications in plants occur under normal
growth conditions. Thus even so-called ‘constitutive’ mod-
ifications may play an important role in mechanisms to
regulate activity through protein abundance. The ability to
exactly determine and quantify various types of protein
damage has a clear advantage, as the underlying biochem-
ical pathways/mechanisms responsible for specific damage
can be identified and associated with environmental condi-
tions. The pmsr2-1 mutant provides an insight into how a
disturbance in the balance of oxidation and reduction of
proteins can lead to a general increase in protein damage,
and how plants have developed mechanisms to fine-tune
the oxidative load of proteins. This paper highlights the
importance of developing accurate tools to analyse profiles
of multiple protein damage in plants. The described method
has wide-ranging applications for investigation of the
involvement of protein modifications in a number of
physiological processes, especially in response to stress
and development.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Plant material and growth conditions
Plants of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 (wild-type) and a var-iant with a null mutation in PMSR2 (pmsr2-1) were grown undershort-day conditions (8 h light/16 h dark) at 22�C, 65% relativehumidity, and 150 lmol photons m)2 sec)1 light. The pmsr2-1mutant has been previously restored to wild-type by complemen-tation with a genomic PMSR2 fragment (Bechtold et al., 2004). Five-week-old plants were harvested into liquid nitrogen at various timesduring the day. The plants were subjected to excess light stress(10-fold higher than growth light conditions) 2 h after the onset ofthe light period for 1 h duration. The low-light control was kept inthe controlled environment as described above. Immediately afterexcess light stress, chlorophyll fluorescence measurements wereperformed to assess the effect of photo-damage on the efficiency ofphotosynthetic electron transport (Barbagallo et al., 2003).
Hydrogen peroxide assay
At the end of the stress treatment, leaf material was harvested fromplants treated with excess light and low light. Leaf material (100 mg)was extracted on ice in 100 mM HCl. The extract was centrifuged(11 270 g, 4�C, 10 min), and the supernatant (500 ll) was elutedthrough charcoal (500 ll of a 1:3 w/v charcoal/water mixture in amini-column, with forced flow using a 1 ml syringe). The resultingsupernatant was used for determination of the concentration of
hydrogen peroxide using Amplex� Ultra Red (Molecular Probes,http://www.invitrogen.com) and horseradish peroxidase. The pro-duct of the reaction, resorufin, was detected spectrophotometricallyat 571 nm, and the result was calibrated against a standard curve ofknown concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (0–10 nmol).
Preparation of samples for LC-MS/MS
All steps of the protein extraction were performed under nitrogen toavoid autoxidation during sample processing. Total leaf protein wasextracted on ice in 1 ml of HEPES buffer at pH 7.5. The samples werecentrifuged (4�C, 18 900 g, 30 min), and protein in the supernatantwas concentrated by microspin ultrafiltration (12 kDa cut-off,VectaSpin filter; Whatman, http://www.whatman.com). The result-ing protein concentrate was assayed by the Bradford method, andan aliquot (100 lg) was digested by exhaustive sequential enzy-matic hydrolysis with pepsin, pronase E, aminopeptidase andprolidase as described previously (Ahmed et al., 2002). Thishydrolysate was used for assay of markers of protein glycation,oxidation and nitration.
Quantification of protein glycation, oxidation and nitration
adduct residues by LC-MS/MS
The following glycation, oxidation and nitration adducts and aminoacids were quantified by LC-MS/MS: protein glycation adducts(argpyrimidine, CML, CEL, 3DG-H, dityrosine, DOLD, FL, G-H1,GOLD, MG-H1 and MOLD), oxidation markers (NFK, dityrosine andMetSO), the nitration marker 3-NT (Figure 1), and amino acids Lys,Arg, Met, Trp and Tyr. Normal isotopic abundance and stable iso-tope-substituted calibration standards were prepared as describedpreviously (Thornalley et al., 2003). NFK was prepared by formyla-tion of kynurenine (Fukunaga et al., 1982), and [15N2]NFK was pre-pared by oxidation of [15N2]Trp with H2O2 and purification byreverse-phase HPLC (Simat and Steinhart, 1998). Samples wereassayed by LC-MS MS by the method described previously(Thornalley et al., 2003) with modifications (Ahmed et al., 2005a),and detection conditions for NFK (parent mass 237.0 Da, fragmentmass 191.0 Da, collision energy 12 eV) and [15N2]NFK (parent mass239.0 Da, fragment mass 193.0 Da, collision energy 12 eV). Glyca-tion, oxidation and nitration adduct residues of plant proteinextracts were detected in exhaustive enzymatic digests (50 lgprotein equivalent) by electrospray positive ionization.
LC-MS/MS multiple reaction monitoring
The detection response was normalized to the responses of relatedisotopic internal standards, and calibrated by assay of authenticanalytical standards. Samples were assayed by LC-MS/MS using a2690 separation module with a Quattro Ultima triple quadrupolemass spectrometric detector (Waters-Micromass, http://www.waters.com/). The ionization source temperature was 120�C, and thedesolvation gas temperature 350�C. The cone gas and desolvationgas flow rates were 150 and 550 l h)1, respectively. The capillaryvoltage was 3.55 kV and the cone voltage was 80 V. Argon gas(0.27 Pa) was used in the collision cell. Programmed molecular ionand fragment ion masses and collision energies were optimized to�0.1 Da and �1 eV, respectively, for multiple reaction monitoringdetection of analytes. The amounts of internal standard used were10 nmol for amino acids, 250 pmol for FL, and 10–50 pmol for AGEsand oxidation and nitrosation biomarkers. LC-MS/MS data analysiswas performed using the WATERS MASSLYNX program (version 4.0).
Protein damage in Arabidopsis 9
ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03898.x
Data on the genome and proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana wereobtained from the European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk).
Statistical analysis
Results are given as means � SD or SEM for 3–5 determinations, asindicated. Statistical tests were all two-sided (£0.05). The signifi-cance of differences between wild-type and pmsr2-1 or excess-lightand low-light treatments was determined using Student’s t test andthe Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. All statistical analyses wereperformed using the SPSS statistical software package (version 15.0,http://www.spss.com).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project was supported by a Royal Society Research grant (2005/R1) awarded to U.B., and a grant from the University of Essex toP.M.M. N.R. and P.J.T. thank the Wellcome Trust for support for ourresearch on protein glycation, oxidation and nitration research.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, N. and Thornalley, P.J. (2007) Advanced glycation end-products: what is their relevance to diabetic complications? Dia-betes Obes. Metab. 9, 233–245.
Ahmed, M.U., Thorpe, S.R. and Baynes, J.W. (1986) Identificationof N epsilon-carboxymethyllysine as a degradation product offructoselysine in glycated protein. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4889–4894.
Ahmed, N., Argirov, O.K., Minhas, H.S., Cordeiro, C.A. and Thorn-
alley, P.J. (2002) Assay of advanced glycation endproducts(AGEs): surveying AGEs by chromatographic assay with deriva-tization by 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl-carbamateand application to Ne-carboxymethyl-lysine- and Ne-(1-carboxy-ethyl) lysine-modified albumin. Biochem. J. 364, 1–14.
Ahmed, N., Ahmed, U., Thornalley, P.J., Hager, K., Fleischer, G.A.
and Munch, G. (2005a) Protein glycation, oxidation and nitrationadduct residues and free adducts of cerebrospinal fluid in Alz-heimer’s disease and link to cognitive impairment. J. Neurochem.92, 255–263.
Ahmed, N., Babaei-Jadidi, R., Howell, S.K., Beisswenger, P.J. and
Thornalley, P.J. (2005b) Degradation products of proteins dam-aged by glycation, oxidation and nitration in clinical type 1 dia-betes. Diabetologia 48, 1590–1603.
Asada, K. (1999) The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: scavengingof active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev.Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 601–639.
Baker, N.R. (2008) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosyn-thesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 89–113.
Barbagallo, R.P., Oxborough, K., Pallett, K.E. and Baker, N.R. (2003)Rapid, non-invasive screening for perturbations of metabolismand plant growth using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. PlantPhysiol. 132, 485–493.
Barber, J. and Andersson, B. (1992) Too much of a good thing: lightcan be bad for photosynthesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 61–66.
Barry, B.A., el Deeb, M.K., Sandusky, P.O. and Babcock, G.T. (1990)Tyrosine radicals in photosystem II and related model com-pounds. Characterization by isotopic labeling and EPR spectros-copy. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20139–20143.
Bechtold, U., Murphy, D.J. and Mullineaux, P.M. (2004) Arabidopsispeptide methionine sulfoxide reductase2 prevents cellular oxi-dative damage in long nights. Plant Cell 16, 908–919.
Boschi-Muller, S., Olry, A., Antoine, M. and Branlant, G. (2005) Theenzymology and biochemistry of methionine sulfoxide reducta-ses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1703, 231–238.
Conklin, P.L., Pallanca, J.E., Last, R.L. and Smirnoff, N. (1997)L-ascorbic acid metabolism in the ascorbate-deficient Arabidop-sis mutant vtc1. Plant Physiol. 115, 1277–1285.
Corpas, F.J., del Rio, L.A. and Barroso, J.B. (2007) Need of bio-markers of nitrosative stress in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 12,436–438.
Davies, K.J.A. (1993) Protein modification by oxidation and the roleof proteolytic enzymes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 346–352.
Dixon, D.P., Skipsey, M., Grundy, N.M. and Edwards, R. (2005)Stress-induced protein S-glutathionylation. Plant Physiol. 138,2233–2244.
Droge, W. (2002) Free radicals in the physiological control of cellfunction. Physiol. Rev. 82, 47–95.
Walla, M.D., Thorpe, S.R. and Baynes, J.W. (1990) Reaction ofascorbate with lysine and protein under autoxidizing conditions:formation of Ne-(carboxymethyl)lysine by reaction betweenlysine and products of autoxidation of ascorbate. Biochemistry29, 10964–10970.
Durner, J., Wendehenne, D. and Klessig, D.F. (1998) Defense geneinduction in tobacco by nitric oxide, cyclic GMP, and cyclic ADP-ribose. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10328–10333.
Feechan, A., Kwon, E., Yun, B.W., Wang, Y., Pallas, J.A. and Loake,
G.J. (2005) A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant diseaseresistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8054–8059.
P.M., Nonell, S., Wilson, M.T. and Baker, N.R. (2006) Imaging theproduction of singlet oxygen in vivo using a new fluorescentsensor, Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green�. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1725–1734.
Fortpied, J., Gemayel, R., Stroobant, V. and Van Schaftingen, E.
(2005) Plant ribulosamine/erythrulosamine 3-kinase, a putativeprotein-repair enzyme. Biochem. J. 388, 795–802.
Fryer, M.J., Ball, L., Oxborough, K., Karpinski, S., Mullineaux, P.M.
and Baker, N.R. (2003) Control of Ascorbate Peroxidase 2expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status duringexcess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabid-opsis leaves. Plant J. 33, 691–705.
Fukunaga, Y., Katsuragi, Y., Izumi, T. and Sakiyama, F. (1982) Flu-orescence characteristics of kynurenine and N’-formylkynure-nine. Their use as reporters of the environment of tryptophan 62in hen egg-white lysozyme. J. Biochem. 92, 129–141.
Grune, T., Reinheckel, T. and Davies, K.J.A. (1997) Degradation ofoxidized proteins in mammalian cells. FASEB J. 11, 526–534.
Gunther, M.R., Sturgeon, B.E. and Mason, R.P. (2002) Nitric oxidetrapping of the tyrosyl radical-chemistry and biochemistry. Tox-icology 177, 1–9.
Hansel, A., Heinemann, S.H. and Hoshi, T. (2005) Heterogeneity andfunction of mammalian MSRs: enzymes for repair, protection andregulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1703, 239–247.
Hoganson, C.W. and Babcock, G.T. (1992) Protein-tyrosyl radicalinteractions in photosystem II studied by electron spin resonanceand electron nuclear double resonance spectroscopy: compari-son with ribonucleotide reductase and in vitro tyrosine. Bio-chemistry 31, 11874–11880.
Jez, J.M. and Penning, T.M. (2001) The aldo-keto reductase (AKR)superfamily: an update. Chem. Biol. Interact. 130, 499–525.
Kuhn, D.M., Sakowski, S.A., Sadidi, M. and Geddes, T.J. (2004)Nitrotyrosine as a marker for peroxynitrite-induced neurotoxicity:
10 Ulrike Bechtold et al.
ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03898.x
the beginning or the end of the end of dopamine neurons?J. Neurochem. 89, 529–536.
Lander, H.M., Tauras, J.M., Ogiste, J.S., Hori, O., Moss, R.A. and
Schmidt, A.M. (1997) Activation of the receptor for advancedglycation end products triggers a p21ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway regulated by oxidant stress.J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17810–17814.
Lindermayr, C., Saalbach, G. and Durner, J. (2005) Proteomic iden-tification of S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.137, 921–930.
Møller, I.M. and Kristensen, B.K. (2006) Protein oxidation in plantmitochondria detected as oxidized tryptophan. Free Radic. Biol.Med. 40, 430–435.
Murthy, U.M. and Sun, W.Q. (2000) Protein modification by Ama-dori and Maillard reactions during seed storage: roles of sugarhydrolysis and lipid peroxidation. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 1221–1228.
Neill, S.J., Desikan, R. and Hancock, J.T. (2003) Nitric oxide signal-ling in plants. New Phytol. 159, 11–35.
Pryor, W.A. and Squadrito, G.L. (1995) The chemistry of peroxyni-trite: a product from the reaction of nitric oxide with superoxide.Am. J. Physiol. 268, L699–L722.
Rabbani, N. and Thornalley, P.J. (2008a) Assay of 3-nitrotyrosine intissues and body fluids by liquid chromatography with tandemmass spectrometric detection. Methods Enzymol. 440, 337–359.
Rabbani, N. and Thornalley, P.J. (2008b) The dicarbonyl proteome:proteins susceptible to dicarbonyl glycation at functional sites inhealth, aging, and disease. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1126, 124–127.
Rinalducci, S., Murgiano, L. and Zolla, L. (2008) Redox proteomics:basic principles and future perspectives for the detection of pro-tein oxidation in plants. J. Exp. Bot., 59, 3781–3801.
Romero, H.M., Berlett, B.S., Jensen, P.J., Pell, E.J. and Tien, M.
(2004) Investigations into the role of the plastidial peptidemethionine sulfoxide reductase in response to oxidative stress inArabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 136, 3784–3794.
Romero, H.M., Pell, E.J. and Tien, M. (2006) Expression profileanalysis and biochemical properties of the peptide methioninesulfoxide reductase A (PMSRA) gene family in Arabidopsis. PlantSci. 170, 705–714.
Romero-Puertas, M.C., Campostrini, N., Matte, A., Righetti, P.G.,
Perazzolli, M., Zolla, L., Roepstorff, P. and Delledonne, M. (2008)Proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsisthaliana undergoing hypersensitive response. Proteomics 7,1459–1469.
Rouhier, N., Santos, C., Tarrago, L. and Rey, P. (2006) Plant methi-onine sulfoxide reductase A and B multigenic families. Photo-synth. Res. 89, 247–262.
Sadanandom, A., Poghosyan, Z., Fairbairn, D.J. and Murphy, D.J.
(2000) Differential regulation of plastidial and cytosolic isoformsof peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase in Arabidopsis. PlantPhysiol. 123, 255–263.
Saito, S., Yamamoto-Katou, A., Yoshioka, H., Doke, N. and Kawakita,
K. (2006) Peroxynitrite generation and tyrosine nitration in defenseresponses in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 689–697.
Simat, T.J. and Steinhart, H. (1998) Oxidation of free tryptophan andtryptophan residues in peptides and proteins. J. Agric. Food.Chem. 46, 490–498.
Singla-Pareek, S.L., Reddy, M.K. and Sopory, S.K. (2003) Geneticengineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads toenhanced salinity tolerance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100,14672–14677.
Tang, X.S., Zheng, M., Chisholm, D.A., Dismukes, G.C. and Diner,
B.A. (1996) Investigation of the differences in the local proteinenvironments surrounding tyrosine radicals YzÆ and YdÆ in pho-tosystem II using wild-type and the D2-Tyr160Phe mutant ofSynechocystis 6803. Biochemistry, 35, 1475–1484.
Thornalley, P.J. (1993) The glyoxalase system in health and disease.Mol. Aspects Med. 14, 287–371.
Thornalley, P.J. (2003) Glyoxalase I – structure, function and a crit-ical role in the enzymatic defence against glycation. Biochem.Soc. Trans. 31, 1343–1348.
Thornalley, P.J. (2005) Glycation free adduct accumulation in renaldisease: the new AGE. Pediatr. Nephrol. 20, 515–522.
Thornalley, P.J. (2006) Quantitative screnning of protein glycation,oxidation, and nitration adducts by LC-MS/MS: protein damage indiabetes, uremia, cirrhosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. In RedoxProteomics (Dalle-Donne, I., Scaloni, A. and Butterfield, D.A.,eds). Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, pp. 681–727.
Thornalley, P.J., Langborg, A. and Minhas, H.S. (1999) Formation ofglyoxal, methylglyoxal and 3-deoxyglucosone in the glycation ofproteins by glucose. Biochem. J. 344, 109–116.
Babaei-Jadidi, R. and Dawnay, A. (2003) Quantitative screening ofadvanced glycation endproducts in cellular and extracellularproteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Biochem. J. 375, 581–592.
M., Nystrom, T. and Jansen-Durr, P. (2009) Identification of Hsc70as target for AGE modification in senescent human fibroblasts.Biogerontology, 10, 299–309.
Valderrama, R., Corpas, F.J., Carreras, A., Fernandez-Ocana, A.,
Chaki, M., Luque, F., Gomez-Rodriguez, M.V., Colmenero-Varea,
P., del Rio, L.A. and Barroso, J.B. (2007) Nitrosative stress inplants. FEBS Lett. 581, 453–461.
Van Camp, W., Van Montagu, M. and Inze, D. (1998) H2O2 and NO:redox signals in disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 3, 330–334.
Vandelle, E. and Delledonne, M. (2008) Methods for nitric oxidedetection during plant–pathogen interactions. Methods Enzymol.437, 575–594.
Wautier, J.L. and Schmidt, A.M. (2004) Protein glycation: a firm linkto endothelial cell dysfunction. Circ Res. 95, 233–238.
Weissbach, H., Resnick, L. and Brot, N. (2005) Methionine sulfoxidereductases: history and cellular role in protecting against oxida-tive damage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1703, 203–212.
Yadav, S.K., Singla-Pareek, S.L., Reddy, M.K. and Sopory, S.K.
(2005) Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing glyoxalaseenzymes resist an increase in methylglyoxal and maintain higherreduced glutathione levels under salinity stress. FEBS Lett. 579,6265–6271.
Yamauchi, Y., Ejiri, Y. and Tanaka, K. (2002) Glycation by ascorbicacid causes loss of activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carbox-ylase/oxygenase and its increased susceptibility to proteases.Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1334–1341.
Yamauchi, Y., Ejiri, Y., Toyoda, Y. and Tanaka, K. (2003) Identifica-tion and biochemical characterization of plant acylamino acid-releasing enzyme. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 134, 251–257.
Y.S., Pinsky, D. and Stern, D. (1994) Enhanced cellular oxidantstress by the interaction of advanced glycation end productswith their receptors/binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9889–9897.
Protein damage in Arabidopsis 11
ª 2009 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03898.x