Quality of Life Council Committee Meeting Record
(DRAFT)
Meeting Date: 10-12-2009 Convened: 12:00 p.m. Adjourned: 1:58 p.m.
Pauline Medrano, Chair Vonciel Jones Hill, Vice-chair Sheffie Kadane
Briefing Presenters:
Steve Salazar Carolyn R. Davis David Neumann Angela Hunt Non-Committee Members: Dwaine Caraway Tennell Atkins Special Guests: Deborah Dennis, Rex Dennison & Mike Navarro with Oncor Electric
-David Cossum, Department of Sustainable Development & Construction -Elizabeth Ramirez, Public Works & Transportation Staff Present: Forest Turner, Kathleen Cervenka, Rick Galceran, Vernon Young, Gary Titlow, Patty Ramirez, Paul Currington, Chief Golbeck, Laura Foland, Daniel Soliz, Errick Thompson, Stephanie McHenry
AGENDA: 1. Approval of September 29, 2009 minutes
Presenter(s): Information Only: Action Taken/Committee Recommendation(s): Motion to approve the September 29, 2009 minutes with the correction of council member Hunt absent on “official City business”.
Motion made by: Vonciel Jones Hill Motion seconded by: Steve Salazar Item passed unanimously: __X__ Item passed on a divided vote: Item failed unanimously: Item failed on a divided vote:
2. Screening for Outdoor Storage
Presenter(s): David Cossum Information Only: __X__
Action Taken/Committee Recommendation(s):
The briefing discussed screening for outside storage and questions raised such as: are current screening requirements adequate, are current parking requirements appropriate, are all districts which currently allow an outside storage used appropriately, are metal fences appropriate to meet screening requirements. The City Planning Commission (CPC) made several recommendations: strike outside storage as a permitted main use in the CA district, require outside storage to be screened in an IM district, limit maximum stacking height, add a landscape buffer requirement when screening fence is visible and within 200 feet of right-of-way, and reduce parking requirements to one space per 5,000 square feet of outside storage area.
Quality of Life Council Committee Meeting Record
(DRAFT) Next steps include having a City Council Public Hearing to consider the amendments on November 9, 2009 and provide the Quality of Life Committee with a follow-up briefing on alternatives. Motion made by: Motion seconded by: Item passed unanimously: ____ Item passed on a divided vote:
Item failed unanimously:
Item failed on a divided vote:
3. Street Lighting – Process to Report & Repair Outages Presenter(s): Elizabeth Ramirez, Deborah Dennis, Rex Dennison & Mike Navarro
Information Only: __X__ Action Taken/Committee Recommendation(s): All lights are maintained by ONCOR, which creates a one stop shop. ONCOR maintains lights on public streets, repairs lights on failure, and keeps a database of outstanding and completed repairs. City Staff are responsible for resolving complaints on repeated calls or lack of service, enforces contract requirements, warrants and approves new installations, and patrols streets and freeways for outages. Property owners are responsible for lighting private properties for guard lights, alley lighting and security lighting. When reporting a street light outage it can be done either by calling 311 or online at www.oncorstreetlight.com. The new online system was launched on August 1, 2009 and allows customers the option to enter contact information and receive automated notification when repairs are completed. The intake screens also allow for history maintenance with each street light to be used to identify repeat failures. Future enhancements to the system will be made such as adding City-owned street light locations on maps and adding Tx-DOT owned street lights. Outage repairs are made by ONCOR contractors and are given required response times. Routine repairs are 5 days, circuit repairs are 15 days, and knockdowns are 30 days. ONCOR is not required to patrol for outages, yet the City of Dallas has signal maintenance technicians that are dedicated to patrolling during the night shifts. Only major streets and freeways are patrolled. Future actions include returning to the Quality of Life Committee with patrolling results, enhancements to ONCOR’s street light outage reporting system, and the status of new technologies related to energy savings and remote monitoring.
Motion made by: Motion seconded by: Item passed unanimously: _ ___ Item passed on a divided vote: ____ Item failed unanimously: Item failed on a divided vote:
_________________________ _________________________ Pauline Medrano Witness Chair
Urban Forest Inventory Using LiDAR & Hyperspectral Images
• Larger existing trees provide 60-70 times the benefit of newly planted trees
• Highest priority in managing any urban forest is a complete tree inventory
• Traditional method of inventory involves volunteers surveying only public trees
• These methods were very labor intensive, time consuming and often inaccurate
• Since public trees comprise only 15-20% of the entire urban forest, the traditional method only provides a small part of the picture
Project History
• Since a traditional survey was not ideal, extensive researched was completed which included hyperspectralimages (a new type of image)
• Dr. Fang Qiu was asked by the chair if the new images could be used for a complete tree inventory.
• “It may be possible…but it has never been done”• Chair works diligently to convince others of the value by
personally funding the field work portion of the project ($13K) and contributing almost a year of time
• Chair raises over $100K to complete the project• Chair authorized the project to move forward lacking
$30K of the required budget
Dallas on the “Cutting Edge”
• First complete tree inventory ever based on laser scanning and hyperspectral images using highly advanced computer algorithms
• New technology developed by Dr. Qiu and the chair which allows all tree inventory data to be easily accessed and utilized in makingcritical urban forest management decisions
• This is a first in the history of urban forestry in that someone can now effectively manage ALL trees (public & private) by simply sitting at their computer
• Hyperspectral images can also be used to manage water quality & quantity, street markings or light fixtures and many others relating to existing land cover management (grey & green infrastructure)
Cost and Next Steps
• The projected cost to complete all of the city is 1.25 million for collection and 1.25 million for processing
• When other city departments understand the potential use of the images in infrastructure management, the cost can be shared and become very economical
• As the use of hyperspectral images increases in the future, the cost will decrease
• Brief other departments on the potential uses
• Brief NCTCOG, EPA, Texas Forest Service and others to gain backing & financial support in completing a city & regional tree inventory & infrastructure mapping project
Urban Forestry Inventory using Urban Forestry Inventory using Concurrent Airborne Concurrent Airborne LiDARLiDAR and and HyperspectralHyperspectral Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Fang Fang QiuQiu
University of Texas as DallasUniversity of Texas as Dallas
Sponsored by Sponsored by
Dallas Urban Forest Advisory CommitteeDallas Urban Forest Advisory Committee
OutlineOutline
Study areaStudy area
Remote Sensing Data CollectionRemote Sensing Data Collection LiDAR, HyperspectralLiDAR, Hyperspectral
Field Data Collection and AnalysisField Data Collection and Analysis In situ spectroradiometer data collection and analysisIn situ spectroradiometer data collection and analysis
Field tree specie, GPS location collectionField tree specie, GPS location collection
LiDAR Data Filtering LiDAR Data Filtering Segmentation and DTM generationSegmentation and DTM generation
Ground/nonGround/non--ground separationground separation
LiDAR Tree Mass Point Extraction LiDAR Tree Mass Point Extraction Hyperspectral NDVI Hyperspectral NDVI
0-2
OutlineOutline
Urban Tree Top (UTT) IdentificationUrban Tree Top (UTT) Identification Tree Top ClimbingTree Top Climbing
Tree heightTree height
Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) DelineationUrban Tree Canopy (UTC) Delineation Donut Expanding and Sliding Donut Expanding and Sliding –– Canopy DiameterCanopy Diameter
Base height, crown depth Base height, crown depth
Urban Tree Species (UTS) IdentificationUrban Tree Species (UTS) Identification NeuroNeuro--fuzzy classificationfuzzy classification
Digital 3D Tree Canopy Model ConstructionDigital 3D Tree Canopy Model Construction Individual Tree Modeling Individual Tree Modeling
0-3
Study AreaStudy Area City of DallasCity of Dallas
Two pilot study sites, with a Two pilot study sites, with a total area of 20 square milestotal area of 20 square miles
0-4
Remote Sensing Data CollectionRemote Sensing Data Collection Terra Remote Sensing, Inc (TRSI)Terra Remote Sensing, Inc (TRSI)
Sydney, British Columbia, CanadaSydney, British Columbia, Canada
Mission partner at University of VictoriaMission partner at University of Victoria
Date: September, 23Date: September, 23--24, 200824, 2008
Aircraft Type: Piper NavajoAircraft Type: Piper Navajo Altitude: 960 m and 1260 mAltitude: 960 m and 1260 m
Flying air speed: 235km/hrFlying air speed: 235km/hr
Total Data VolumeTotal Data Volume HyperHyper--Spectral Imaging Data: 181 GBSpectral Imaging Data: 181 GB Radiance (60.6 GB) +Reflectance (121 GB)Radiance (60.6 GB) +Reflectance (121 GB)
LiDAR Data: 3.4 GBLiDAR Data: 3.4 GB 64 GB after uncompressed64 GB after uncompressed
0-5
LiDAR DataLiDAR Data Terrain Scanning Laser SystemTerrain Scanning Laser System
LiDAR Point Cloud Density LiDAR Point Cloud Density (Average Spacing: 1/D(Average Spacing: 1/D1/21/2))
9/23/2008: 2 pts/m9/23/2008: 2 pts/m2 2 (0.7 m)(0.7 m) Due to overlap, 3.5 pts/mDue to overlap, 3.5 pts/m22 (0.53 m)(0.53 m)
9/24/2008: 1.25 pts/m9/24/2008: 1.25 pts/m22 (0.89 m)(0.89 m) Due to overlap, 2 pts/mDue to overlap, 2 pts/m22 (0.7 m)(0.7 m)
%Overlap: 80%Overlap: 80
Number of Returns: 2 Number of Returns: 2 First and Last ReturnsFirst and Last Returns
Bandwidth: 1064 nmBandwidth: 1064 nm
Beam divergence: 0.45 mradBeam divergence: 0.45 mrad
0-6
LiDAR DataLiDAR Data
3D visualization of elevation of LiDAR points over the Reverchon park study area
LiDAR DataLiDAR Data: Turtle Creek Corridor: Turtle Creek Corridor
3D visualization of elevation of LiDAR points over the Turtle Creek Corridor
HyperHyper--spectral Imaging (HSI) Dataspectral Imaging (HSI) Data AISA DUAL HSI Sensor AISA DUAL HSI Sensor Spectral Spectral
Imaging Ltd. FinlandImaging Ltd. Finland
Simultaneous acquisition of Simultaneous acquisition of VNIR and SWIR dataVNIR and SWIR data
AisaEAGLE (VNIR)AisaEAGLE (VNIR)
AisaHawk (SWIR)AisaHawk (SWIR)
492 Band (400492 Band (400--2500 nm)2500 nm) VNIR (400VNIR (400--970nm, 2.44 nm)970nm, 2.44 nm)
SWIR (970SWIR (970--2500nm, 6.28 nm)2500nm, 6.28 nm)
Spatial Resolution Spatial Resolution 9/23/2008: 1.2 m 9/23/2008: 1.2 m
9/24/2008: 1.6 m 9/24/2008: 1.6 m
Sidelap: 22%Sidelap: 22%
0-9
AisaEAGLE(400-970 nm)
AisaHAWK(970-2500 nm)
AisaDUAL sensor assembly, side view(AisaEAGLE on the right, AisaHAWKon the left)
AisaDUAL sensor assembly, back view
Mosaic of HSIMosaic of HSI
0-10
Color Infrared Color Infrared Composite ImageComposite Image Red: 841.13 nmRed: 841.13 nm
Green: 677.11 nmGreen: 677.11 nm
Blue: 561.66 nmBlue: 561.66 nm
Typical ColorsTypical Colors Trees: RedTrees: Red
Buildings: CyanBuildings: Cyan
Water: Blue/blackWater: Blue/black
In Situ Spectroradiometer Data CollectionIn Situ Spectroradiometer Data Collection FieldSpec Pro ASD SpectroradiometerFieldSpec Pro ASD Spectroradiometer
Spectral Range from 350 Spectral Range from 350 –– 2500 nm2500 nm
Spectral Sampling of 1.4 nm in 350Spectral Sampling of 1.4 nm in 350--1050 nm and 2nm in 10501050 nm and 2nm in 1050--2050 nm 2050 nm range resulting in 2151 bandsrange resulting in 2151 bands
Scan time of less than 3 secondsScan time of less than 3 seconds
Spectroradiometer High Intensity Contact Probe
In Situ Spectroradiometer Data CollectionIn Situ Spectroradiometer Data Collection
Sampling areasSampling areas Reverchon parkReverchon park
Turtle Creek areaTurtle Creek area
Reflectance Spectral Signature for 50 speciesReflectance Spectral Signature for 50 species
Mean Spectral Profile for each species used as Reference Spectra
Species Spectral Seperability analysisSpecies Spectral Seperability analysis
Using GFLVQ approach (50 Testing Samples)Using GFLVQ approach (50 Testing Samples)
About 60About 60--72% of accuracy was achieved72% of accuracy was achieved
Double the % accuracy of the spectral angle mapping Double the % accuracy of the spectral angle mapping Trial Accuracy
1 64%
2 62%
3 62%
4 68%
5 64%
6 60%
7 70%
8 72%
9 68%
10 70%
Trial Accuracy
1 34%
2 30%
3 34%
4 42%
5 42%
6 36%
7 40%
8 42%
9 40%
10 42%
GFLVQ SAM
Urban Tree Field Survey Data by Halff Association
Turtle Creek CorridorTurtle Creek Corridor Total 2602 trees surveyed.Total 2602 trees surveyed. Total 46 species foundTotal 46 species found 10 most frequently occurring 10 most frequently occurring
species identified. species identified.
LiDAR Data FilteringLiDAR Data Filtering
Segmentation using MNNSegmentation using MNN
Ground and nonGround and non--ground ground separationseparation
Digital Terrain Model Digital Terrain Model generationgeneration
Lidar FiltringLidar Filtring
Ground pointsGround points
NonNon--ground pointsground points
Lidar filtering of ground and nonLidar filtering of ground and non--ground pointsground points
LiDAR Data FilteringLiDAR Data Filtering: Ground points: Ground points
LiDAR Data FilteringLiDAR Data Filtering: Non: Non--groundground
Ground Points
0-23
LiDAR Tree Mass Point ExtractionLiDAR Tree Mass Point Extraction Normalized Difference Vegetation Normalized Difference Vegetation
Index (NDVI) Index (NDVI)
Red: 660nm (band 113)Red: 660nm (band 113)
NearNear--infrared: 860nm (band 198)infrared: 860nm (band 198)
nir red
nir red
NDVI
0-24
Urban Tree Top Identification & Canopy DelineationUrban Tree Top Identification & Canopy Delineation
3.0
3.5
4.8
5.9
6.5
7.2
8.3 9.0
8.07.5
6.7
6.2
5.2
4.2
2.8
3.1
Crown Diameter
Urban Tree TopUrban Tree Top: Results: Results
Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Delineation Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Delineation : Results: Results
Urban Tree Species (UTS) IdentificationUrban Tree Species (UTS) Identification: Results: Results
Accuracy AssessmentAccuracy Assessment
0-28
Species Name Accuracy Species Name Accuracy
American Elm 39.39% Bois d'arc 91.67%
Hackberry 47.89% Sycamore 72.73%
Pecan 65.55% Black Locust 87.50%
E. Red Cedar 62.93% Redbud 100.00%
Shumard Red Oak 77.27% Persimmon 100.00%
Tree of Heaven 76.36% Slash pine 100.00%
Cedar Elm 83.54% Gingko 100.00%
Green Ash 87.23% Southern Magnolia 100.00%
Red Mulberry 84.62% Dogwood 100.00%
Chinaberry 78.79% White Ash 100.00%
Gum Bumelia 88.89% Pear 100.00%
Baldcypress 84.00% Chinese Pistache 100.00%
Cherry Laurel 95.00% Chinese Tallow 100.00%
Boxelder 90.00% Southern Catalpa 100.00%
Post Oak 100.00% Sweetgum 100.00%
Live Oak 89.47% Golden Raintree 100.00%
Bur Oak 94.12% Black Walnut 100.00%
94.12% Honey Locust 100.00%
Crepe Myrtle 100.00% Western Soapberry 100.00%
Black 93.75% Catalpa 66.67%
Kappa 64.4% Total Accuracy: 68.8%
40 Species which have field number >= 2
Digital 3D Tree Canopy Model ConstructionDigital 3D Tree Canopy Model Construction Tree top locations (xt,yt)
Tree heights (z)
Tree base heights(bh)
Tree crown depths (ch)
Tree crown radius (cr)
1:( ) ( )( )1
2 :
n nnt t
n n
n conical shapex x y yz bhn elliptical shapech cr
Tree model: Results
Individual Tree Extraction and Visualization
Individual Tree Structure Model Individual Tree Structure Model
0-32
Katy Trail Extensionfrom
McCommas Boulevard to White Rock Station
Presented to the Quality of Life Committee
By Public Works and Transportation
October 26, 2009
2
Purpose of Briefing
Provide updates on Phase III, IV, and VI of the Katy Trail Extension from McCommas Boulevard to the White Rock Station
3
Background Katy Trail Extension is being implemented in the
following phases: Katy Trail Phase III - from McCommas Boulevard to
Skillman Street Katy Trail Phase IV - from Skillman Street to the White Rock
Station Katy Trail Phase VI - from Ellsworth Avenue north to
Worcola Street (Mockingbird Pedestrian Bridge) Phase VI was separated from Phase III in 2006 due
to numerous issues related to the design of the grade separated crossing at Mockingbird Lane
Phases I, II, and V are complete
4
Background (continued)
5
Katy Trail Phase III –from McCommas to Skillman
Joint project between City of Dallas and the Texas Department ofTransportation (TxDOT)
Limits: McCommas Boulevard at North Central Expressway to Sandhurst Street just west of Skillman Street (Approximately 1.15 miles)
Scope: 12-ft wide concrete trail Current total estimated cost – $2.8 M, originally $2M Current funding sources
RTC – $2M Federal share $1.6 M (80%) Local share $400,000 (20%)
Additional local share - $800,000 $250,000 – 2006 bond program $550,000 - savings from two cancelled projects on Skillman
between Union Pacific Railroad and Lovers(authorized by Council on 10/26/2005)
6
Katy Trail Phase III –from McCommas to Skillman (continued)
City is the lead agency to administer design and construction
Estimated Schedule Environmental clearance completed - April 2009 Design completed – August 2009 ROW acquisition complete - December 2009 Utility relocation complete - December 2009 Construction letting – January 2010 Construction begin – March 2010 Construction complete – March 2011
7
Katy Trail Phase IV – from Skillman to White Rock StationJoint project between City of Dallas and TxDOT Limits: from Skillman Street to the White Rock Station
(Approximately 2.5 miles) Scope: 12-ft wide concrete trail with four 12-ft wide pedestrian
bridges (Skillman, Abrams, Ridgewood Park, UPRR at Fisher) and passing zones along the Northwest Highway segment for the shared trail and alley
Current funding sources - $4,812,000 Federal share $3,849,600 (80%) Local share $962,400 (20%)
– 2006 bond program has $962,400 towards local share Current total estimated cost – $5.4 M, originally $4,812,000 Additional $588,000 is needed. We anticipate using the
contingency funds to fund this additional cost. Bidding may reduce the construction cost.
8
Katy Trail Phase IV – from Skillman to White Rock Station (continued)
City is the lead agency to administer design and construction
Estimated Schedule (if local share becomes fully funded) Environmental clearance complete - February
2010 Design complete – March 2010 ROW acquisition complete - February 2010 Utility relocation complete - March 2010 Construction letting – June 2010 Construction begin – September 2010 Construction complete – September 2011
9
Katy Trail Phase IV – from Skillman to White Rock Station (continued)
10
Katy Trail Phase IV – from Skillman to White Rock Station (continued)
11
Katy Trail Phase VI –from Ellsworth to Worcola
Joint project between City of Dallas, TxDOT, and Dallas County
Limits: from Ellsworth Avenue to Worcola Street (Approximately 0.65 miles)
Scope: 12-ft wide concrete trail 841-ft long, 16-ft wide signature pedestrian bridge
over Mockingbird Lane 94-ft long, 14-ft wide pedestrian bridge over DART
track
12
Katy Trail Phase VI –from Ellsworth to Worcola (continued)
13
Katy Trail Phase VI –from Ellsworth to Worcola (continued)
Mockingbird Pedestrian Bridge
14
Katy Trail Phase VI –from Ellsworth to Worcola (continued)
Mockingbird Pedestrian Bridge
15
Katy Trail Phase VI –from Ellsworth to Worcola (continued)
Current total estimated cost – $8.1 M Current funding sources
Federal share $6.48 M (80%) Local share $1.62 M (20%)
Dallas County $810,000 2008 MCIP
City of Dallas $810,000. This amount could come from: Contingency funds Naming rights to the Mockingbird Bridge (J.C.
Williams Trust previously committed $250,000 if named after Mr. Williams)
16
Katy Trail Phase VI –from Ellsworth to Worcola (continued)
City is the lead agency to administer design and construction
Estimated Schedule (if local share becomes fully funded) Environmental clearance completed - April 2009 Design complete – March 2010 ROW acquisition complete - January 2010 Utility relocation complete - January 2010 Construction letting – September 2010 Construction begin – December 2010 Construction complete – December 2011
Questions and Discussion
17
OneDAY DallasCitywide Rollout in 2010
Presented to Neighborhood Quality of LifeOctober 26, 2009
Mary Nix, DirectorSanitation Services
2
Purpose• Review plan for OneDAY Dallas transition
• Solicit Council input for outreach
3
Background• January 16, 2009
– Provided a memo to Council– Advised on successful implementation of Phase 1
and plans to initiate Phase 2 in February 2009
• April 15, 2009– Council briefing on Too Good To Throw Away– Update status and look to future phases
• August 19, 2009– Briefed Council on SAN budget– Included cost savings projected with OneDAY
4
What is OneDAY ?• Phase 1 of OneDAY started in Mar 2008 with
far north Dallas• Phase 2 followed in Feb 2009 in NW Dallas• Phase 3 intended to be NE Dallas
– Council approved citywide transition with FY10 budget
– Impacts approximately 180,000 households
• Cost Savings– FY10 $2.07M– FY11 $1.60M
• Transition to occur on March 1, 2010
5
Transition Plan: Component 1 - Route Development
• Assess current routes and service styles– 55% curbside and 45% alley– Truck types and sizes– Manpower– Special needs
• Use software to re-route
• Field check each route
• Finalize routes
(April 2009 – November 2009)
6
OneDAY Service Days
7
Transition Plan: Component 1 - Route Development
• Met with individual Council members in early November– reviewed new days of service– identifed locations where service changes
are needed– planned community meetings schedule
(April 2009 – November 2009)
8
PHASE 1 COMPLETED
PHASE 2 COMPLETED
PHASE 3 March, 2010
9
Service Location Changes
10
Transition Plan: Component 1 - Route Development
• Lessons learned about …– Carts set out on wrong day– Carts placed in wrong location– Missed calls spike..and then decrease… over a
6-week period
• Anticipate increase in recycling tonnage collected
(April 2009 – November 2009)
11
The OneDAY Effect 2009 Household Recycling2007 Household Recycling
12
• Increased budget for larger outreach $1M
• Two modes: Broad scope and Targeted• Broad strategies
• Radio/newspaper advertising
• Billboards, kiosks, bus advertising
• Web site with OneDAY look-ups by address
• Dedicated call center at 3-1-1
• Community meetings (scheduled and requested)
Transition Plan: Component 2 - Public Outreach
(August 2009 – March 2010)
13
Proposed Community MeetingsCouncil Member District Day Date Time Location DAY OF SERVICE
Kadane/Davis 9 and 7 Monday 4-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Harry Stone Rec Center MONDAYNeumann/Jasso 3 and 1 Monday 4-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Mattie Nash/Myrtle Davis Rec Cente MONDAYJones Hill 5 Tuesday 5-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Janie C. Turner Rec Center TUESDAYCaraway 4 Tuesday 5-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Skyline Branch Library TUESDAYJasso 1 Tuesday 5-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. North Oak Cliff Branch Library TUESDAYAllen/Koop 10 and 11 Wednesday 6-Jan-10 7 p.m. Forest Green Branch Library TUESDAYHunt 14 Wednesday 6-Jan-10 7 p.m. Lakewood Branch Library CURBJones Hill 5 Thursday 7-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Polk Wisdom Branch Library THURSDAYNeumann 3 Thursday 7-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Mountain Creek Branch Library FRIDAYHunt/Kadane 14 and 9 Thursday 7-Jan 5:30 p.m. Central Library Auditorium CURBMedrano 2 Thursday 7-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Ignacio Zaragoza FRIDAYJasso 1 Saturday 9-Jan-10 North Oak Cliff Branch Library TUESDAYDavis 7 Saturday 9-Jan-10 Martin Luther King Rec Center TUESDAYSalazar 6 Saturday 9-Jan-10 Anita Martinez Rec Center TUESDAYJones Hill 5 Saturday 9-Jan-10 Thurgood Marshall Rec Center FRIDAYCaraway 4 Monday 11-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Beckley Saner Rec Center MONDAYSalazar 6 Monday 11-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Arcadia Park Branch Library MONDAYAtkins 8 Tuesday 12-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Singing Hills Rec. Center TUESDAYDavis 7 Tuesday 12-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Larry Johnson Rec Center TUESDAYNeumann 3 Thursday 14-Jan-10 7 p.m. Park in the Woods Rec Center FRIDAYAtkins 8 Thursday 14-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Fireside Rec. Center THURSDAYHunt 14 Thursday 14-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. K.B. Polk Rec. Center THURSDAYJones Hill 5 Saturday 16-Jan-10 Pleasant Grove Branch Library TUESDAYDavis 7 Saturday 16-Jan-10 Eloise Lundy Rec Center MONDAYMedrano 2 Saturday 16-Jan-10 Samuell Grand Rec Center FRIDAYAllen 10 Monday 18-Jan-10 7 p.m. Willie B. Johnson Rec Center MONDAYMargolin 13 Monday 18-Jan-10 7 p.m. Preston Royal Branch Library MONDAYMedrano 2 Thursday 21-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Samuell Grand Rec Center FRIDAYKadane 9 Thursday 21-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Harry Stone Rec Center FRIDAYHunt 14 Thursday 21-Jan-10 6:30 p.m. Lakewood Branch Library FRIDAYAtkins 8 Saturday 23-Jan-10 Tommie Allen Rec Center FRIDAYNeumann 3 Saturday 23-Jan-10 Hampton Illinois Branch Library THURSDAYSalazar 6 Saturday 23-Jan-10 Jaycee Zaragoza Rec Center MONDAYJasso 1 Saturday 23-Jan-10 North Oak Cliff Branch Library TUESDAYNeumann/Salazar 3 and 6 Saturday 30-Jan-10 Dallas West Branch Library TUESDAYCaraway 4 Saturday 30-Jan-10 Lancaster Kiest Branch Library FRIDAYAllen 10 Saturday 30-Jan-10 Audelia Road Branch Library TUESDAYKadane 9 TBD TBD 6 p.m. Lochwood Branch Library CURB
14
Transition Plan: Component 2 - Public Outreach
• Targeted strategies• Direct calls to households
• Invitations to community meetings
• Letters to households
• Cart hangers
• Emails to community associations
• Special messaging on city utility bills
(August 2009 – March 2010)
15
02468
10121416
Jul
Sept
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Planning Operations Outreach Evaluation
Transition Plan: The TimelineDetails of Transition Plan in Appendix
16
OneDAY: Follow-up Plans
After March 2010 implementation:
• Survey customers
• Share early findings with Council– 3-6 months after roll-out– customer adjustments (“missed” calls)– changes in recycling volumes
• Use early findings to adjust proposed FY11 budget for savings
(March 2010– Summer 2010)
Request for Council Feedback
AppendixTimeline Detail: Planning stageTimeline Detail: Operations Timeline Detail: Outreach activities Advertisements HOA email Invitation Post Card Cart hangers Notification Letter Web site in a snap-shot
19
02468
10121416
AprilJu
ne
Aug Oct Dec
Feb AprJu
ne
Budget Dev Route Dev Council Mtgs Outreach Planning
Timeline detail: Planning
20
05
1015202530
AprilJu
ne
Aug Oct Dec
Feb AprJu
ne
Routing Carts Ordered Carts InventoriedCarts Delivered Trucks Ordered Eval to Council
Timeline detail: Operations
21
0
5
10
15
20
AugSep
tOctNovDecJa
nFeb Mar AprMayJu
ne
Planning WRR Dallas WeeklyUnivision Radio Bus Ads BillboardsKiosks HOA emails Press Event
Timeline detail: Outreach (Broad Scope)
22
Ads
Bus Ad Sample
Print Ad Sample
Billboard Ad Sample
Kiosk Ad Sample
Click to hear Radio PSA (English Sample)
23
0
5
10
15
20
AugSep
tOctNovDecJa
nFeb Mar AprMayJu
ne
Planning Council Input Community MtgsWeb site Ltrs Phone CallsCart Hangers HOA emails Survey
Timeline detail: Outreach (Personalized)
24
Email Alert
25
Post Card
26
Cart Hangers
27
Notification Letter
28
www.OneDAYDallas.com