Page 1
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
July 2019
Draft for comments
1
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2
REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONAL INSPECTORATES 3
(July 2019) 4
DRAFT FOR COMMENTS 5
6
7 © World Health Organization 2019 8 9 All rights reserved. 10 11 This draft is intended for a restricted audience only, i.e. the individuals and organizations having received this draft. The draft 12 may not be reviewed, abstracted, quoted, reproduced, transmitted, distributed, translated or adapted, in part or in whole, in any 13 form or by any means outside these individuals and organizations (including the organizations' concerned staff and member 14 organizations) without the permission of the World Health Organization. The draft should not be displayed on any website. 15 16 Please send any request for permission to: 17 18 Dr Sabine Kopp, Group Lead, Medicines Quality Assurance, Technologies Standards and Norms, Department of Essential 19 Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland, email: [email protected] . 20 21 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this draft do not imply the expression of any opinion 22 whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or 23 of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate 24 border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. 25 26 The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or 27 recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and 28 omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. 29 30 All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this draft. 31 32 However, the printed material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility 33 for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for 34 damages arising from its use. 35 36 This draft does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization. 37
38
Please send any comments you may have to Dr Valeria Gigante ([email protected] ), Technical Officer,
Medicines Quality Assurance, with a copy to Ms Claire Vogel ([email protected] ) by 20 September 2019.
Working documents are sent out electronically and they will also be placed on the WHO Medicines website
(http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/guidelines/en/) for comments under
the “Current projects” link. If you wish to receive our draft guidelines, please send your e-mail address to
[email protected] and your name will be added to our electronic mailing list.
.
Page 2
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 2
SCHEDULE FOR DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT QAS/19.811: 39
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 40
FOR NATIONAL INSPECTORATES 41
Description of Activity Date
During the Joint Meeting on Regulatory Guidance for
Multisource Products, several WHO guidances were
identified for updating, including the Quality Management
System for National Good Manufacturing Practise
Inspectorates (WHO Technical Report Series (TRS), No.
902, Annex 8, 2002).
Copenhagen, July 2016
The Fiftieth World Health Organization (WHO) Expert
Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations
(ECSPP) confirmed the need to update the guidances that had
been selected for review during the Joint Meeting on
Regulatory Guidance for Multisource Products (Copenhagen,
July 2016) including the Quality System Requirements for
National Good Manufacturing Practices Inspectorates.
17 - 21 October 2016
Preparation of an in-depth situation analysis with regard to
the need for updating the guidance texts identified in the
before-mentioned meetings.
October 2017 – June 2018
During the consultation on Good Practices for Health
Products Manufacture and Inspection, the WHO Secretariat
presented the detailed analysis conducted on the cluster of
guidelines proposed for revision.
10-12 July 2018
The Fifty-third ECSPP recommended the WHO Secretariat
revise the Guideline Quality Management System for
22-26 October 2018
Page 3
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 3
National Inspectorates according to the proposals made by
the WHO Secretariat.
Preparation of the first draft working document by Dr
Dimitrios Catsoulacos from the WHO Prequalification (PQ) -
Team Inspection.
February - May 2019
Circulation of the draft document to WHO (PQ) - Team
Inspection for comments.
May 2019
Mailing of working document inviting comments, including
to the Expert Advisory Panel on the International
Pharmacopoeia and Pharmaceutical Preparations (EAP),
and posting of the working document on the WHO website
for public consultation.
May – 23 June 2019
Consolidation of comments received and review of feedback.
Preparation of working document for discussion.
End of June 2019
Discussion of working document and feedback received
during the public consultation in the informal Consultation on
Good Practices for Health Products Manufacture and
Inspection.
2 -5 July 2019
Revision of the working document based on comments
received during the informal Consultation on Good Practices
for Health Products Manufacture and Inspection.
July 2019
Mailing of the revised working document for second round
inviting comments, including to the EAP, and posting the
working document on the WHO website for public
consultation.
Mid-July – September
2019
Page 4
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 4
42
43
Consolidation of comments received and review of feedback.
Preparation of working document for discussion by the
ECSPP.
End of September 2019
Presentation to the Fifty-fourth meeting of the ECSPP. 14 -18 October 2019
Any other follow-up action as required.
Page 5
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 5
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 44
FOR NATIONAL INSPECTORATES 45
46
BACKGROUND 47
48
During the Joint Meeting on Regulatory Guidance for Multisource Products (Copenhagen, July 49
2016), several World Health Organization (WHO) guidances were identified for update. In 50
October 2016, the Fiftieth WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical 51
Preparations (ECSPP) confirmed the need to update the selected guidances. 52
53
Following up on the recommendation from the Fiftieth ECSPP, the WHO Secretariat conducted 54
a detailed analysis of the cluster of guidelines proposed for revision. The outcome of this 55
analysis was discussed during the consultation on Good Practices for Health Products 56
Manufacture and Inspection (Geneva, July 2018). In particular, considering that the WHO 57
Quality System Requirements for National GMP Inspectorates (1) defines the basic 58
requirements applicable to quality systems for the operation of inspection services within 59
national regulatory authorities (NRA) concerned with GMP inspections, the WHO Secretariat 60
proposed a strategy for revision that includes aligning the guidance with ISO 9001:2015 61
principles (2) and with Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention/Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S) 62
relevant guidance (3), as well as broadening its scope to include all GXP-related inspections 63
conducted by a NRA. 64
65
The Fifty-second ECSPP endorsed the proposal for revision and recommended the WHO 66
Secretariat to revise the WHO Quality System Requirements for National GMP Inspectorates 67
aligning its content to international standards, the latest quality management systems (QMS) 68
principles and to expanding the scope. 69
70
1. Introduction 71
2. Scope 72
3. Glossary 73
4. Quality management system 74
5. Context of the inspectorate 75
Page 6
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 6
6. Management and leadership 76
7. Management system planning 77
8. Resources 78
9. Documentation 79
10. Operational planning and performance evaluation 80
11. Publications 81
82
References 83
Further reading 84
85
86
Page 7
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 7
1. INTRODUCTION 87
88
1.1 This document describes the quality management system (QMS) requirements 89
for the operation of inspection services within national regulatory authorities 90
(NRA) or other state structures (for the purpose of this guidance, the term 91
“NRA” will be used in the text to represent both NRA and other state 92
structures). It is intended that each inspection service uses these requirements 93
as the basis for developing and implementing its own QMS. Where the 94
inspectorate operates under the umbrella of the NRA QMS, consideration 95
should be given to the WHO Guideline on the Implementation of Quality 96
Management Systems for National Regulatory Authorities (4). 97
98
1.2 The adoption of a common standard for QMS requirements is an essential 99
element in achieving consistency in inspection practices and facilitating 100
structured communication with other units of the NRA, as well as enabling 101
mutual confidence and permitting recognition between pharmaceutical 102
inspectorates. 103
104
2. SCOPE 105
106
This document outlines the QMS requirements for pharmaceutical inspectorates, competent 107
for the oversight of GXP operations. 108
109
3. GLOSSARY 110
111
corrective actions 112
Steps taken to eliminate the cause of existing nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. 113
The corrective action process tries to make sure that existing nonconformities and potentially 114
undesirable situations do not happen again. 115
116
117
118
Page 8
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 8
good practices (GXP) 119
Acronym for the group of good practice guides governing the preclinical, clinical, 120
manufacturing, testing, storage, distribution and post-market activities for regulated 121
pharmaceuticals, biologicals and medical devices, such as good laboratory practices (GLP), 122
good clinical practices (GCP), good manufacturing practices (GMP), good pharmacovigilance 123
practices (GPP) and good distribution practices (GDP). 124
125
internal audit 126
An examination and assessment of all or part of a quality system with the specific purpose of 127
improving it. An internal audit is usually conducted by an independent (of the function to be 128
audited) and qualified team of experts designated by the management for this purpose. 129
130
quality indicators 131
Selected data intended to be monitored and used in assessing trends in performance. 132
133
quality management system 134
An appropriate infrastructure, encompassing the organizational structure, procedures, 135
processes and resources necessary to ensure adequate confidence that a product (or service) 136
will satisfy given requirements for quality. 137
138
quality manual 139
A document that includes the quality policy and objectives and describes the various elements 140
of the QMS. 141
142
quality policy 143
A brief statement that describes the organization’s purpose, overall intentions and strategic 144
direction, provides a framework for quality objectives and includes a commitment to meet 145
applicable requirements. 146
147
148
149
150
Page 9
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 9
rapid alert 151
An urgent notification submitted by a NRA participating in the Rapid Alert System concerning 152
measures taken against a product placed on the market which poses a risk to consumers’ health 153
and/or safety. 154
155
risk management 156
The systematic application of quality management policies, procedures and practices to the 157
tasks of assessing, controlling, communicating and reviewing risk. 158
159
standard operating procedure (SOP) 160
An authorized written procedure giving detailed instructions for performing a task or following 161
a process in accordance with legislation, official guidance or internal standards. 162
163
4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 164
165
4.1 QMS is a wide-ranging concept which covers all matters that are necessary to 166
implement the inspectorate’s quality policy and to meet predefined objectives. 167
168
4.2 The QMS should define the inspectorate’s scope and context within the regulatory 169
mandate as well as cover all functions, processes and activities 170
171
4.3 The primary aim of an inspectorate’s QMS is as follows: 172
173
a. to ensure its ability to consistently provide services that meet the organization’s 174
objectives, as well as legal requirements and interested parties’ expectations; and 175
176
b. to facilitate continual improvement and provide a sound basis for sustainable 177
development in compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements. 178
179
4.4 The QMS should at least describe and manage organizational structure, responsibilities, 180
procedures, systems, processes and resources required, to provide value and achieve 181
results for the inspectorate and relevant interested parties. 182
Page 10
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 10
4.5 Typically, the legal basis for the establishment of the inspectorate, its mandate, the 183
quality policy and the principles of the QMS should be documented in a quality manual 184
or equivalent document. 185
186
4.6 The QMS should enable senior (“top”) management to best use available resources and 187
systems in order to achieve the inspectorate’s targets and quality objectives. Senior 188
management’s commitment and active participation is essential to ensure 189
implementation of the QMS and to support of staff within the inspectorate. 190
191
5. CONTEXT OF THE INSPECTORATE 192
193
5.1 The legal basis for the establishment of the inspectorate, its mandate, as well as statutory 194
and regulatory responsibilities and functions, should be clearly defined. 195
196
5.2 The inspectorate should determine its scope and its strategic direction in order to 197
achieve the intended objectives. 198
199
5.3 The structure and operation of the inspectorate should be such that impartiality 200
is safeguarded. Rules for deontology, confidentiality, ethics and conflict of 201
interest should be clearly defined and obeyed. Where relevant, the inspectorate 202
should implement a policy which distinguishes between the process of 203
inspection and that of providing an advisory service. This service should be of 204
benefit to all of industry and not solely to individual organizations. 205
206
5.4 The relationship of the inspectorate with other departments within the same NRA and 207
other agencies and organizations outside the inspectorate, as well as any other 208
stakeholders, should be described and documented where relevant. 209
210
MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP 211
212
6.1 Senior management should make a formal commitment to the implementation of a 213
documented quality policy that is compatible with statutory requirements and relevant 214
Page 11
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 11
objectives. 215
216
6.2 Senior management should ensure that inspectorate’s services and functions are aligned 217
with regulatory requirements and NRA’s objectives, as well as meeting interested 218
parties’ expectations. 219
220
6.3 Senior management is accountable for the integration of QMS requirements into the 221
inspectorate’s processes and functions, for communicating the importance of QMS 222
principles and for the overall effectiveness of the QMS. In addition, senior management 223
should promote the application of risk management principles and support the 224
engagement and contribution of personnel in improving the QMS. 225
226
6.4 Senior management should ensure that the pharmaceutical inspectorate has sufficient 227
and appropriate resources at all levels to enable it to meet its objectives. 228
Responsibilities, authorities and reporting structure for relevant roles should be clearly 229
defined and documented in the QMS. The structure should be defined in organization 230
charts. 231
232
6.5 An appropriately experienced and qualified person should be nominated as a 233
QMS responsible person. This person should have direct access to senior 234
management. If necessary, this task may be assigned to more than one person. 235
236
6.6 There shall be a system for periodic management review of the QMS effectiveness, 237
including process improvements. Such reviews should be documented and records 238
should be maintained for a defined period. 239
240
7. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLANNING 241
242
7.1 The inspectorate should establish appropriate objectives for the intended level of 243
service and of its functions that should be consistent with the quality policy and 244
regulatory requirements. Risk management and sustainable development principles 245
should be considered for the establishment of these objectives. 246
Page 12
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 12
7.2 These objectives should be communicated to personnel at all levels and be updated 247
whenever necessary. 248
249
7.3 Appropriate resources should be available to meet these objectives. Roles and 250
responsibilities should be defined and, where appropriate, timelines for completion 251
should be established. Systems for monitoring and evaluating results should be 252
established. The inspectorate should maintain all necessary information on quality 253
objectives. 254
255
7.4 The inspectorate should establish a documented change management system that should 256
ensure that change requests are assessed, approved or rejected, that appropriate 257
resources are allocated, and that roles and responsibilities are defined. Any change 258
should be documented, communicated to the personnel and evaluated after 259
implementation to ensure the objectives are met. The change management system 260
should ensure that continual improvement is undertaken in a timely and effective 261
manner. 262
263
8. RESOURCES 264
265
8.1 The inspectorate should have an organizational structure, required resources 266
(financial, human, facilities and others) and documented procedures that enable 267
it to meet its objectives, to perform inspection activities in accordance with 268
official GXP guidelines and national legislation and carry out its functions and 269
operations satisfactorily. Where necessary, measures and resources for the 270
safety of personnel should be available. 271
272
Personnel 273
274
8.2 The inspectorate should employ the required personnel possessing the 275
appropriate expertise to perform its functions, including inspections, and to 276
determine whether the inspected entities comply with the principles of current 277
GXP guidelines and with relevant legislation. 278
Page 13
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 13
8.3 Personnel responsible for inspections should have appropriate qualifications, 279
training, experience and knowledge of the inspection process and subject and 280
should be periodically evaluated. They should have the ability to make 281
professional judgements as to the conformity of the inspected party with the 282
requirements of good practices and the relevant legislation, and be able to apply 283
risk management principles in their decision-making process. 284
285
8.4 The inspectorate should ensure that induction and continuous training is provided to 286
inspection personnel on administrative, regulatory and technical topics to maintain 287
the inspectors’ competency aligned with current industry practice, technological 288
advancements and regulatory changes. Training should be documented and its 289
effectiveness assessed periodically. 290
291
8.5 The inspectorate should maintain documented and up-to-date information on 292
the relevant qualifications, training and experience of each inspector. 293
294
8.6 Personnel should have clear, up-to-date and documented job descriptions 295
specifying their duties and responsibilities. 296
297
8.7 When products are procured from a third party and/or services are subcontracted to an 298
external body or expert, the inspectorate should ensure that the third party meets 299
predefined documented criteria, qualifications and the relevant requirements of the 300
quality management system. Senior management should ensure that these 301
external bodies or experts are periodically evaluated. Third party liability should 302
be clearly defined in the contract or agreement. 303
304
8.8 All personnel employed or contracted by the inspectorate should obey the 305
inspectorate’s code of conduct and should not be subject to any commercial, 306
financial or other pressures which might affect their judgement and freedom to 307
act. They should not be under the control of the pharmaceutical industry and 308
must be assessed for potential conflict of interest. Personnel and third-party 309
declarations of conflict of interest should be maintained, reviewed periodically 310
Page 14
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 14
and updated where necessary. It should be ensured that any decision-making 311
process remains with the inspectorate and is not influenced by any third party 312
313
Infrastructure 314
315
8.9 The inspectorate should provide personnel with the necessary infrastructure and 316
appropriate work environment to support its functions and to enable meeting 317
the quality objectives. Infrastructure includes, but is not limited to: 318
319
a. buildings, workspace, and associated facilities; 320
b. qualified equipment, including hardware and software; 321
c. transportation resources; and 322
d. information and communication technology. 323
324
9. DOCUMENTATION 325
326
9.1 The inspectorate should establish and maintain a system for the control of all 327
documentation, including electronic files, relating to inspectorate’s QMS and activities. 328
This should include policies, procedures, guidelines, records and any documents of 329
external origin, such as legislation, which may directly or indirectly influence the 330
activities of the inspectorate; or documents received from pharmaceutical companies 331
and relevant organizations, as appropriate. 332
333
9.2 The inspectorate should ensure that its functions and operations are described 334
in SOPs that clearly define the responsibilities, processes and actions. These 335
may include, but not be limited to, training, inspections, reporting after 336
inspections, handling of complaints, licensing (issue, suspension, withdrawal), 337
certification, handling of quality, safety and efficacy issues, documentation 338
control, change and deviation management, inspection planning, risk 339
management and the handling of appeals. 340
341
342
Page 15
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 15
9.3 The system and activities relating to advising on, issue, withdrawal, suspension of 343
licenses, registrations, certifications and the application of other regulatory sanctions 344
on facilities, organizations, products or operations, should be detailed in procedures and 345
be in accordance with relevant guidelines and national legislation. 346
347
9.4 The inspectorate should establish procedures describing communication with other 348
NRA units and external interested parties (e.g. industry, media) considering any 349
statutory and regulatory requirements, where appropriate. Similarly, a procedure for 350
exchanging regulatory information with other NRAs or national quality control 351
laboratories should be available. 352
353
9.5 Activities relating to the sampling and testing of pharmaceutical products and raw 354
materials should be described in a procedure which should also include the process for 355
handling non-conforming products (e.g. substandard or falsified medical products). 356
357
9.6 The inspectorate should have procedures on handling quality, safety and efficacy issues 358
which may lead to recall or the withdrawal of products from the market. Where 359
applicable, the inspectorate should establish and maintain a system for communicating 360
Rapid Alerts. Records of recalls and withdrawals should be maintained in accordance 361
with national legislation. 362
363
9.7 The inspectorate should have documented procedures for dealing with complaints 364
arising from its activities or those of its personnel and any contracted person or 365
organization. A record should be maintained of all complaints received and the actions 366
taken by the inspectorate. These records should be retained for a specified period of 367
time. 368
369
9.8 The inspectorate should have procedures for consideration of appeals against 370
its decisions. 371
372
373
374
Page 16
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 16
9.9 The documentation control system should ensure that: 375
376
a. Documents are identified by title, author, reviewer, approver and unique 377
identification. They should be dated and authorized by the appropriate persons 378
prior to issue. 379
b. Current versions of documents are held by nominated personnel. 380
c. A register of all relevant documents and document holders should be 381
maintained. 382
d. Superseded documents are withdrawn from use but are retained for defined 383
periods of time. 384
e. Any changes to documents are made in a controlled manner and are properly 385
authorized. There should be a means of identifying changes in individual 386
documents. 387
f. Records relating to inspectorate’s activities and functions are readily available 388
and are retained for an adequate period in line with legal requirements or internal 389
standards. 390
g. Records comply with the relevant obligations under national legislation. 391
h. Records are safely stored during their retention period and held under conditions 392
that guarantee their security and confidentiality unless otherwise required by 393
national legislation. The destruction of records after their retention period 394
follows a predefined procedure. 395
i. Electronic documentation and record management systems should provide at 396
least the same level of assurance, compliance, accuracy and security as a manual 397
system. 398
399
9.10 An inspection should be categorized in accordance with GXP guidelines (e.g. GMP, 400
GDP, GCP) and its scope (e.g. product, process) and type (e.g. triggered, routine, 401
follow-up) should be appropriately defined and documented. 402
403
9.11 The inspectorate should plan inspections in advance and elaborate a written programme 404
as part of the inspectorate’s annual workplan. Risk management principles should be 405
considered when establishing an inspection programme and prioritizing inspections as 406
Page 17
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 17
well as when conducting an inspection. Where repeated inspections of a company or 407
organization have to be carried out, the frequency should be determined based on risk 408
management principles defined in a procedure. 409
410
9.12 Inspection-related documents and records as defined in relevant inspection procedures 411
(e.g. inspection plan, aide-memoire, checklists, worksheets and company documents 412
and records) should be maintained for a defined period. 413
414
9.13 When more than one inspector is involved in an inspection, a lead inspector should be 415
appointed to coordinate inspection activities. The inspection report should be prepared 416
by the lead inspector with the assistance of all participating inspectors and/or experts 417
and should be agreed upon by all participating inspectors and or experts. 418
9.14 The inspection report should follow a pre-approved format. Observations and/or data 419
obtained in the course of inspection should be recorded in a timely manner in order to 420
prevent loss of relevant information. 421
422
9.15 The inspection report should be sent to the inspected company or organization within 423
the inspectorate’s established timelines. The lead inspector and all concerned 424
inspectors and/or experts should participate in assessing the company’s response to 425
determine the appropriateness of corrective and preventive actions as well as the GXP 426
compliance status of the company or organization. 427
428
9.16 Completed inspections should be reviewed to ensure that requirements are met. 429
430
10. OPERATIONAL PLANNING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 431
432
10.1 An annual workplan should be developed, documented and periodically reviewed by 433
senior management, including all inspectorate’s activities in accordance with a written 434
procedure. Regulatory, statutory and scientific requirements should be taken into 435
account during the planning of operations and services. Consideration should also be 436
given to the availability of required resources and the ability to consistently provide 437
services that meet legislative requirements and stakeholder expectations. Risk 438
Page 18
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 18
management principles should be used during planning to determine, monitor and 439
manage risks and to identify opportunities for process improvements. Any changes to 440
the workplan should follow the inspectorate’s change management system. 441
442
10.2 Appropriate quality indicators and methods should be established in order to monitor 443
and periodically evaluate the inspectorate’s processes and level of improvement and 444
service (including contracted-out services) and demonstrate that they were carried out 445
as planned and met predefined quality objectives. These quality indicators, methods, 446
analyses and results should be documented. 447
448
10.3 The results of the analyses should be used to evaluate the performance and effectiveness 449
of the QMS, the adequacy of actions taken to address risks and the need for further 450
improvements. 451
452
Internal Audits 453
454
10.4 The inspectorate should implement a system of periodic and documented 455
internal audits of its operations to assess compliance with the requirements of 456
the QMS. Internal audits should be conducted at least once a year. 457
458
10.5 Internal audit processes, criteria, scope and documents should be defined. 459
Auditors qualifications and selection criteria should be documented. Internal 460
audit records, including the findings, conclusions, recommendations and 461
follow-up actions, should be retained for a defined period. 462
463
10.6 Corrective actions corresponding to audit findings should be identified, 464
documented and implemented in a timely manner. The effectiveness of these 465
actions should be evaluated and the risk plan should be updated to take note of 466
the root causes to the non-conformances. 467
468
469
470
Page 19
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 19
Management Review 471
472
10.7 Senior management should review the inspectorate’s QMS at planned intervals 473
to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy, effectiveness and alignment with 474
the inspectorate’s strategic direction and legislative requirements. Management 475
reviews should be conducted at least once a year. 476
477
10.8 A management review should include, but not be limited to: 478
479
a. the status of the actions from previous management reviews; 480
b. any internal or external changes affecting the QMS; 481
c. any deviations affecting the functionality of the QMS 482
d. the extent to which quality objectives have been met; 483
e. process performance analyses; 484
f. audit results and effectiveness of corrective actions; 485
g. complaints and appeals; 486
h. adequacy of resources; 487
i. any identified risks and mitigation measures; and 488
j. opportunities for improvements. 489
490
11. PUBLICATIONS 491
492
11.1 The inspectorate should issue and maintain an up-to-date list of inspected and licensed 493
facilities and organizations, including information on the outcome of inspections. This 494
list may become publicly available in accordance with national legislation. 495
496
11.2 The inspectorate should ensure that other relevant publications, such as technical 497
guides, GXP guidelines and regulatory requirements, are publicly available. 498
499
500
501
502
Page 20
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 20
References 503
504
1. Quality System Requirements for National GMP Inspectorates (WHO Technical 505
Report Series, No. 902, Annex 8, 2002). 506
507
2. Quality Management Systems —Requirements. International Standard ISO 9001. 508
Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 2015. 509
510
3. Recommendation on Quality System Requirements for Pharmaceutical 511
Inspectorates – Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention/Co-operation Scheme 512
(PIC/S) PI002-3, 2007. 513
514
4. WHO Guideline on the Implementation of Quality Management Systems for 515
National Regulatory Authorities (Working document QAS/19.783). 516
517
Further reading 518
519
1. WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main 520
Principles. WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical 521
Preparations. Forty-eight Report, Geneva, World Health Organization, 2014 522
(WHO Technical Report Series, No. 986 Annex 2). 523
524
2. WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (WHO 525
Technical Report Series, No. 957, 2010, Annex 2). 526
527
3. WHO Good Practices for Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories (WHO 528
Technical Report Series, No. 957, 2010, Annex 1). 529
530
4. Good Distribution Practices for Pharmaceutical Products (WHO Technical Report 531
Series, No. 957, 2010, Annex 5). Update in progress. Good Storage and 532
Distribution Practices (QAS/19.793). 533
Page 21
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 21
https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/qas19_793_534
good_storage_and_distribution_practices_may_2019.pdf?ua=1 (last access 16 July 535
2019). 536
537
5. Good Trade and Distribution Practices for Pharmaceutical Starting Materials 538
(WHO Technical Report Series No. 996, 2016). 539
540
6. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice for Trials on Pharmaceutical Products 541
(WHO Technical Report Series, No. 850, 1995, Annex 3). 542
543
7. WHO Guideline on the Implementation of Quality Management Systems for 544
National Regulatory Authorities. Working document QAS/19.783, January 2019. 545
546
8. Quality Systems Framework for GMP Inspectorates, Compilation of Community 547
Procedures on Inspections and Exchange of Information - European Commission, 548
EMA/572454/2014 Rev. 17, 2014. 549
550
9. Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary. International 551
Standard ISO 9000. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 2015. 552
553
10. Quality Management - Quality of an Organization - Guidance to Achieve 554
Sustained Success. International Standard ISO 9004. Geneva, International 555
Organization for Standardization, 2018. 556
557
11. Conformity Assessment -- Requirements for the Operation of Various Types of 558
Bodies Performing Inspection. International Standard ISO 17020. Geneva, 559
International Organization for Standardization, 2012. 560
561
12. Risk Management – Guidelines. International Standard ISO 31000. Geneva, 562
International Organization for Standardization, 2018. 563
564
565
Page 22
Working document QAS/19.811/Rev.1
Page 22
13. Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems. International Standard ISO 19011. 566
Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 2018. 567
568
14. Medical Devices – Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Regulatory 569
Purposes. International Standard ISO 13485. Geneva, International 570
Organization for Standardization, 2016. 571
572
15. Pharmaceutical Quality System Q10. International Conference on Harmonization, 573
2008. 574
575
*** 576