_3 YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT C DOCUMENT APPROVAL SHI QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE: SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUAL SUPPLIERS LIST APPROVAL PROJECT MANAGER: Original signed by emra, fr-,tt 11/22/89 Date Signature DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: James Blaylock 11/22/89 Date Signature T&MSS Proj. Xgr. (OTHER, AS REQUIRED) W. V. Hacnabb Signature 11/20/89 Date REVISION 0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/29/89 . REVISIONS INITIAL AND DATE REVISION 2 REVISION 3 REVISION 4 DIRECTOR. QA: I f )/)Jm hd& t- . 6 #R156 N/A (OTHER. AS REQUIRED) N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/19/90 Pae I d 45 901101020S 901026 PDR WSTE PDC WM-1 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
_3
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT CDOCUMENT APPROVAL SHI
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE: SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALSUPPLIERS LIST
APPROVAL
PROJECT MANAGER: Originalsigned by
emra, fr-,tt 11/22/89DateSignature
DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: James Blaylock 11/22/89DateSignature
T&MSS Proj. Xgr.
(OTHER, AS REQUIRED)
W. V. HacnabbSignature
11/20/89Date
REVISION 0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/29/89.
REVISIONS
INITIAL AND DATEREVISION 2 REVISION 3 REVISION 4
DIRECTOR. QA:
If )/)Jm hd&� �t-. 6 #R156
N/A
(OTHER. AS REQUIRED)
N/A
EFFECTIVE DATE:10/19/90
Pae I d 45901101020S 901026PDR WSTE PDCWM-1 1
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
TiteQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
T-his procedure establishes the requirements, responsibilities and methods forevaluating suppliers and maintaining the Yucca Mountain Project Office(Project Office) Qualified Suppliers List (QSL).
2.0 APPLIC&BILIfl
2.1 This procedure applies to the evaluation and selection of suppliersthat provide services purchased in accordance with the requirements of theOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Quality AssuranceProgram Description Document (QAPD), Section VII, Control of Purchased Itemsand Services.
2.2 This procedure applies to Project Office staff involved in supplierevaluations activities for services affecting quality.
2.3 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is exemptfrom the requirements of this procedure.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1 FACILITY SURVEY
An activity which involves a direct evaluation of the supplier's facility todetermine the capabilities of a supplier to satisfy the procurement documentquality requirements for a defined or anticipated scope of work, byevaluating the supplier's facilities, personnel and quality assurance (QA)program implementation, thereby ensuring only qualified suppliers areselected and utilized.
3.2 QUALIFIED SUPPLIER
A supplier that has been evaluated and determined to be capable of providingservices, as appropriate, in accordance with the requirements of theprocurement documents.
3.3 QUALIFIED SUPPLIER LIST
A list of qualified suppliers that have been evaluated to determine theircapability to supply services and have been categorized as Qualified.*
Effective Date Revison Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QHP-07-04, Revision 0 2 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
3.4 SERVICE
The performance by a supplier of activities such as design, design review,nondestructive examination, inspection, analyses, audit, testing,calibration, surveillance, training, and etc.
3.5 SUPPLIER
Any individual or organization under contract for furnishing services. Thisincludes the terms vendor, consultant, seller, contractor, subcontractor, andtheir sub-tier level suppliers where appropriate.
3.6 TRIENNIAL AUDIT
The triennial period begins when an audit is performed. An audit may beperformed when the supplier has completed sufficient work to demonstrate thatits organization is implementing a QA program that has the required scope forpurchases placed during the triennial period. A facility survey, whenperformed in accordance with this Quality Management Procedure (OMP), Section5.4, Facility Survey, qualifies as the first triennial audit.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 PROJECT OFFICE, DIRECTOR, QA
The Director, QA shall have overall responsibility for the establishment andimplementation of the supplier evaluation program as described in thisprocedure, and:
4.2.1 Ensuring through evaluation, that the supplier is capable of complyingwith quality requirements in accordance with the procurementdocuments.
4.2.2 Approving supplier evaluations.
4.2.3 Approving the QSL, including all revisions and change notices thereto.
4.2.4 Approving QSL deletion notices.
4.2.5 Ensuring that surveillances and audits are performed in accordancewith established procedures, once a supplier has been placed on theQSL.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 3 i 45 QMP-07-04
'YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4"O
TitueQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
4.3 PROJECT OFFICE QA
Project Office QA shall be responsible for:
4.3.1 Conducting evaluations of suppliers in accordance with therequirements of this procedure.
4.3.2 Maintaining the QSL in accordance with the requirements of thisprocedure.
4.3.3 Transmitting the approved QSL, including all revisions, changenotices, and deletions thereto to Document Control for controlleddistribution in accordance with Administrative Procedure (AP)-1.5Q,Issuance and Maintenance of Controlled Documents.
4.3.4 Performing supplier surveillance and audits in accordance withapproved procedures.
4.4.1 Providing the contracting officer a list of potential suppliers, usinginput from the requester, trade publications, registers, referrals,and other sources of information.
4.4.2 Requesting the contracting officer to arrange for Project Office QAevaluation of suppliers.
4.5 TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS
Technical specialists shall be responsible for planning and conducting thetechnical phase of a facility survey (when assigned or requested by theprocuring organization). The technical evaluation is performed under the
direction of Project Office QA and is incorporated into the Project Office QAevaluation.
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS
5.1.1 General Requirements
5.1.1.1 The evaluation of suppliers for addition to the QSL shall beconducted in accordance with one, or a combination of, the following:quality records review, supplier history review, or a facility survey.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 4 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT .OPROCEDURE 4190
Tlt'.QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
5.1.1.2 Suppliers may be placed on the QSL, through an evaluation of thesupplier's capability to implement the quality elements.
1. Evaluations shall be conducted by Project Office QA personnel anddocumented on the Supplier's Evaluation Report, Figure 2. Theresults of the evaluation shall be submitted to the Project OfficeDirector, QA for approval.
2. Evaluation of commercial suppliers shall be performed specific tothe service and associated quality elements as specified in theprocurement document in accordance with QMP-04-02 Yucca MountainProject Office Procurement Actions.
5.1.1.3 Deficiencies identified during supplier evaluation activities shallbe resolved with the supplier or acceptable corrective action obtained fromthe supplier prior to approving the supplier for placement on the QSL.Justification for approving the supplier prior to the implementation ofcorrective action shall be documented on the Supplier Evaluation Report.
5.1.1.4 Based upon the evaluation results, the supplier may be categorizedas "Qualified' or "Qualified with RestrictionsO. The 'Qualified' suppliershall be placed on the QSL.
5.1.1.5 For those suppliers categorized as "Qualified with Restrictionswthe restriction shall be noted on the QSL in the restriction column. Asupplier's committed corrective actions shall either be verified prior toplacement of the purchase document or concurrently by requiring sourcesurveillance in the purchase document to verify implementation of thecommitted actions.
5.2 QUALITY RECORDS REVIEW
5.2.1 The supplier's quality records supported by qualitative andquantitative information may be objectively evaluated. This shallinclude the review and evaluation of the supplier's QA program manual,procedures, or other similar documents, including subsequentrevisions. The Supplier Quality Program Review checklist, Figure 3,shall be used for this review/evaluation.
1. Comments generated during the review/evaluation shall betransmitted to the supplier utilizing the QA DocumentationApproval Sheet, Figure 4.
2. Comments which are not resolved within 30 days and couldjeopardize quality may be cause for the supplier to be removedfrom the QSL.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 - QP-07-04, Revision 0 5 Of 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT 4-AD-001PROCEDURE 480
TrbeQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
5.3 SUPPLIER HISTORY REVIEW
Supplier history reviews/evaluations may be conducted by Project Office QAbased upon documented information relative to the supplier's past performancein providing the same or similar services.
1. This evaluation shall include the following sources of inputinformation:
a. QA records that have accumulated in connection with previousprocurement actions and service operating experience. Theserecords include but are not limited to Purchase Orders,Supplier Nonconformance Documents, Source Verification, AuditReports or information from other purchasers relative tosupplier's performance in supplying the same or similarservices.
b. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection results andsupplier background information as documented in the currentNUREG-0040.
c. NRC Information Notices and Bulletins.
5.4 FACILITY SURVEY
5.4.1 Facility surveys may be conducted by the Project Office QAorganization when determined to be necessary. The necessity toconduct a facility survey shal. take into consideration, but need notbe limited to, the following ::-.itions:
1. Evaluation of the comple:::v-y, criticality, application, inherentcharacteristics or simi'a: considerations reveals that specialattention to the quality program implementation should be taken.
2. Documented evidence does not exist to confirm that the supplierhas successfully implemented his quality program.
3. The results of the quality records and supplier history reviewsdo not provide sufficient evidence that the supplier's qualityprogram complies with the quality requirements.
5.4.2 Supplier Scheduling and Notification
1. Project Office QA shall --::rdinate through the COTR to requestthe contracting officer : notify potential suppliers of intendedsurveys. Mutually accep:.z-e date(s) shall be established and
Eftectve Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 6 i 4 5 QNP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
the survey scheduled. The schedule shall allow sufficient timefor preparation and allocation of survey duration to investigate.all factors influencing quality.
5.4.3 Facility Survey Planning
1. The responsible Project Office QA evaluator shall initiate aSurvey Checklist, Figure 3. The checklist shall address theappropriate quality element requirements of the procurementdocument (QMP-04-02). The checklist may be supplemented withadditional characteristics, as necessary, to adequately evaluatea given supplier.
2. When necessary,-the checklist will be supplemented by a list ofcharacteristics prepared by the technical specialist that addresstechnical requirements of the procurement document.
5.4.4 Conduct of the Facility Survey
1. A pre-survey conference shall be conducted at the supplierfacility. This conference shall be attended by members of thesurvey team and the appropriate supplier managementrepresentative. The pre-survey conference should address:
a. Introduction of team members and supplier representatives.b. Purpose and Scope of the survey.c. Objective.d. Topics/area to be surveyed.
2. A tour of the facility shall be performed, to observe theoperations and implementation of the suppliers quality programand to determine the suppliers capabilities. The SurveyChecklist shall be completed. Objective evidence shall beexamined for compliance with the checklist requirements to thedepth necessary to determine if the quality program elements areadequate for effective control and are being implementedeffectively. The results shall be documented on the checklist.
3. Upon completion of the survey, an exit conference shall be usedto summarize the survey results and indicate the areas ofsupplier quality and/or technical program that have beendetermined to be acceptable or unsatisfactory. This conferencewill also afford the suppliers management the opportunity toinitiate corrective action or provide additionalinformation/documentation to resolve the apparent deficiency.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 7 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4
rWeQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
5.5 REPORTING
5:5.1 A Supplier Evaluation Report, Figure 2, shall be completed by theProject Office QA evaluator. This report shall include the results ofany technical specialist evaluations. The following shall beaddressed:
1. The evaluator shall review the supplier survey checklists todetermine the status of each characteristic evaluated . Thefollowing ratings shall be applied: Qualified, Qualified withRestrictions, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable.
2. For each Qualified with Restrictions or Unsatisfactory rating, anexplanatory statement shall be given that delineates therestriction bounds or explains the Unsatisfactory rating.
3. The overall supplier status shall be indicated. The followingstatus indicators shall be applied: Qualified, Qualified withRestrictions, or Unsatisfactory. All restrictions shall be fullydetailed. A complete explanation shall be provided for suppliersnot placed on the QSL. A description of the two statusindicators is as follows:
a. Qualified. Selection of this disposition indicates that thesupplier has met necessary requirements consistent with thehighest quality level for which the supplier is approved.
b. Qualified with Restrictions. A prospective supplier may bequalified with restrictions if the supplier is capable ofperforming specific operations for which the qualityrequirements are readily measured. Specific compensatoryprovisions to ensure full compliance with the qualityrequirements shall be specified in the purchase document.
5.5.2 The Supplier Evaluation Report for Qualified or Qualified withRestriction(s) shall be signed and dated by the person(s) whoperformed the supplier evaluation and approved by the Project Office,Director, QA. For those suppliers with an unsatisfactory rating, onlythe evaluator signs the report, which is then maintained as anin-process document until such time as the supplier corrects theunsatisfactory conditions and resubmits the corrective action forre-evaluation.
5.5.3 Evaluated suppliers qualified with restrictions, or determined to beunsatisfactory shall be notified per Section 5.6. After receipt ofsupplier documented corrective action, the supplier shall bere-evaluated in accordance with this QMP.
Effeclive Date Revision | Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 8 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
TiteQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
5.6 SUPPLIER NOTIFICATION
A--letter shall be prepared by Project Office QA and issued within 30 days ofthe Supplier Quality History Review or Facility Survey Evaluation to informthe supplier of the evaluation results. When the results are qualified withrestriction or not qualified, the unsatisfactory program areas requiringCorrective Action or the program restrictions shall be delineated in theletter. The QA Documentation Approval Sheet, Figure 4, shall be initiatedand enclosed with the letter for a Suppliers Quality Records Review. Itshall indicate the Document, Revision, Description, Approval Status, andComments requiring resolution and/or program restrictions.
5.7 QSL ADMINISTRATION
5.7.1 Subsequent to the supplier evaluation and approval of the evaluationby the Project Office QA, suppliers deemed to be acceptable shall becategorized as Qualified/'Qualified with Restrictions" and placed onthe QSL, Figure 5.
5.7.2 QSL Content
1. The QSL shall contain the following information, as a minimum:
a. Supplier name/specific location. -
b. Identification of the type of quality program implemented bythe supplier based upon supplier evaluations).
c. Service scope for which the supplier has been approved.
d. Restrictions (if applicable).
e. The date of the next required evaluation. Each listedsupplier shall reflect a date (yr/mo) which defines when thenext evaluation is due. This activity shall be performedannually.
f. Next required audit date. Enter the month and year threeyears from the facility survey date or from the first auditdate. (See Definition: triennial audit). Leave this columnblank if a facility survey or audit of the supplier has notbeen performed.
g. Suppliers QA Manual revision level/date.
h. Remarks relative to the supplier's capability.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 9 Of 45 Q -07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
r~ueQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
5.7.3 QSL Revision
Based upon the results of supplier evaluation and supplier maintenanceactivities, suppliers may be added, retained, or deleted from the QSL.
1. The QSL shall be revised quarterly, (if necessary), toincorporate change notices occurring during the quarter. TheProject Office, Director, QA shall document approval of the QSLrevisions or changes.
2. QSL changes, which affect location, scope, or restrictionsoccurring during the quarterly period shall be documented on theQSL Cover Page/Change Notice approved by the Project Officer,Director, QA.
3. QA shall forward the approved QSL, revisions, and change noticesto Document Control for controlled distribution in accordancewith AP-1.5Q.
5.8 SUPPLIER MAINTENANCE
5.8.1 General
1. Suppliers may be maintained on the QSL through one or acombination of evaluations, surveillances or audits whichdemonstrate the supplier's capability to implement requiredquality elements.
a. Supplier maintenance activities shall be documented on theSupplier Evaluation Sheet, Figure 2, and approved by theProject Office, Director, QA.
b. Based upon the results of supplier maintenance activities,the supplier shall be retained or deleted from the QSL, asdirected by the Project Office, Director, QA. Activesuppliers shall not be deleted if an audit is required butis overdue. Active suppliers are those who have providedservices within one year of the scheduled audit date.
2. Deficiencies identified during supplier evaluations shall beresolved with the supplier or acceptable corrective actionobtained from the supplier prior to evaluation approval.
3. Supplier evaluation identified restrictions and documentedcommitments made by the supplier, and not implemented prior tothe supplier being approved for retention on the QSL, shall bedocumented in the restrictions column of the QSL.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 10 i 45 QMP-07-04
-4
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
ree*QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
5.8.2 Justification for Retention on QSL
Suppliers shall be reviewed annually by Project Office QA.
1. This review shall take into consideration the extent to which thesupplier has been used in the past, the uniqueness of the serviceprovided, and anticipated future need for the particularservice(s).
2. Suppliers to be deleted shall be identified on the QSL DeletionNotice, Figure 7. The Deletion Notice shall be approved by theDirector, QA and distributed to:
a. The manager of the organization initially requesting thesupplier.
b. The manager of any organization utilizing the supplier inthe previous twelve (12) months.
c. COTR.
3. Adequate justification shall be provided for maintaining thesupplier on the QSL within fifteen (15) days of issuance of theQSL Deletion Notice. Otherwise, a QSL Cover Page/Change Noticewill be initiated to delete the supplier from the QSL. Suppliersmay be deleted without the QSL Deletion Notice when the supplierhas gone out of business, refuses to comply with the requirementsof purchasing documents, or is unacceptable as evidenced by themaintenance activities.
4. Based on the justificat.^:z, the Project Office, Director, QA,shall either approve or :.sapprove the deletion of the supplierfrom the QSL.
5.8.3 Annual Performance Evaluation
This evaluation shall be conducted by the Project Office QAorganization and shall include the following, as appropriate:
1. Review of the suppliers currently approved QA program, manual,procedures or other implementing documents.
2. Review of audits and surveillance reports performed by theProject Office QA organization of the supplier.
Etladve Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 11 i 45 QtQ-07-04
3. Review of corrective action documents. This review shall includean evaluation of the cause, severity, and remedial correctiveaction.
4. Examination of Project Office/Supplier initiated correspondence.
5. Review of NRC data, i.e., NUREG-0040, Information Notices,Bulletins, etc.
6. Other data, i.e., audits conducted by other project participants,DOE projects or nuclear utilities.
7. Trend summaries.
8. Request and obtain from the Cost Account Manager (CAM) an annualevaluation of the supplier's performance.
9. When the results of an annual performance evaluation indicate asignificant decline in supplier performance, an audit shall bescheduled and performed prior to the required triennial audit.
5.8.4 Triennial Audits
The triennial audit period shall be established from the date of theFacility Survey and/or Initial Supplier Audit. The supplier's qualityprogram shall then be audited triennially, at a minimum, in accordancewith QME-18-01 Audit System for the Waste Management Project Office.The audit schedule shall be adjusted in the event of significantchange in supplier's personnel, organization, QA program or annualperformance evaluation. In addition, the need for an audit of thesupplier shall be evaluated when major changes to the purchasedocument's scope of work or work methodology occurs.
6.0 REFERENCES*
6.1 SOURCE DOCUMENTS
1. OCRWM, QAPD, DOE/RW-0215, Section 7, Control of Purchased Items andServices.
2. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Criteria 7, Control of Purchased Items andServices.
3. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Supplement 7S-1, Supplementary Requirements forControl of Purchased Items and Services.
Effective Dale Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QM-07-04, Revision 0 12 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
rETtQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
6.2 INTERFACING DOCUMENTS
1. NUREG-0040, Licensee, Contractor and Vendor Inspection StatusReport.
2. QMP-04-02, Project Office Procurement Actions.
3. QMP-16-02, Trend Analysis.
4. QMP-17-01, Records Management: Records Source Implementation.
5. QMP-18-01, Audit System for the Waste Management Project Office.
6. QMP-18-02, Surveillances.
7. AP-5.1Q, Issue and Maintenance of Controlled Documents.
7.0 FIGURES
Figure 1. Sample Supplier Evaluation Report.
Figure 2. Sample Supplier QA Program Checklist and Supplement forms.
Figure 3. Sample QA Documentation Approval Sheet.
Figure 4. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms.
Figure 5. Sample QSL Cover Page/Change Notice.
Figure 6. Sample QSL Deletion Notice.
8.0 QA RECORDS
A record package consisting of the figures resulting from the implementationof this procedure, are designated as QA records and shall be processed inaccordance with QMP-17-01, Records Management: Records SourceImplementation.
Effectwe Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 13 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTPROCEDURE
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
£11.1
Eyaluate Iofra ddfionblotm
B~ QSLbypedomingcombinaon d
rovws " reeded
I
Page1 d0rOW-O0Q041
Figure 1. Flowchart of QP-07-04.
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT -Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4O90
Ttle.QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Pg. 2d3T4-?sOanl40o
Figure 1. Flowchart of QMP-07-04. (continued)
Effective Date Revision Supersedes ge No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 15 Of 45 QMP-07-04
.Jt
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
risQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Paged3sV704047X01
Figure 1. Flowchart of QMP-07-04. (continued)
Effectiv Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 16 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
rbuQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Docunar Pa . of -
SUPPUER EVALUATION REPORT R A4GE9 1
PURPOSE: 0 ADOITION 0 CHANGE 0 PROGRAM REVISIONO ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 0 TRIENNIAL AUOITO OTHER (cfy
SWPLIER NAJEJADORESS CONTACT NAME/tnE
U TELEPHONE
P7L SPECIFATON SCOPE SERVICEIR_
O PROCUREMENT DOCCUMENT NUI.BER(S)0
U GA MANUAL STATUSAMT
N CODESIS1D COMMITTED TO IN OA MANUAL
31ICFWORB 0 NOA-1.O ANSI.N 45.2 0 COMMERCIAL
Ty CIOUY RECORDS REVIEW 0 FACLTY SURVEYF O3 SUPPLER HISTORYI- SUPPLER DOCUllENTED COMMITMENTS
IE
T
CT
N
AM
KR
Cominuwod0
A DcwzUALIED0oU~jM'W iH REEVALUATION DUE DATE_______AUDOIT DUE DATE
c RESTRICTION.
A DIRECTOF_L AUJTY ASSURANCE S iDM
Figure 2. Sample Supplier Evaluation Report.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 17 d 45 QMP-07-04
-E YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
Ti..QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Dwcumnt Pap - of
SUPPUER EVALUATION REPORTFORM PAGE 2OF 4
SUPPLIER NAME:
CRITERION NO. OALWIT ELEMENT SAT UNSAT WAO*RGANIATI
itSAft ASSUPIAMc PRORAMS OESGN CONTROL
PROAREMENt OCUAENT _
E ISTRUCION. PCEWuRes NO DRAWINGS
* ocenT COaTROLO 7 CCONTRa. OF PLOCKUM MATERAL. EUIPMNT M SERVS
U 5 IDENTfIATIO AM CONTROL OF MATERIA.S. PARTS AM CCWOMP TS
A 0 CONTt.CF OfSPECALPROCESSESLI 10 INPCTION
T 11 TETCOTOY 12 CONTROL a ?ASURLNG AD TEST fEQPMENT
tS WANOLNG. STOP;E AND SHIPPING_
A U 14SPSCTIU4. TEST AND OPERATNG STATUS
C Is NONCNOR* ING MATERAL PARTS OA COCKNTS
O 1 COFRECTIYEACTIO0 1-
I s AUDTSs
DEScRPToN CF OJALIY ASSURANE PRORAM. MANUAL. PAceDURES O OTHER SISLAR DOAEW(SVEWECVALUATEDI
E ii~~~~~~~TU REVSO D ATEE
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
V
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
w
SUVEYIAUDIT DATE AITWU R __
C AUDIT PERFORMED BY:
SURVEY AUDIT RESULTS
TY
ASEUyRIOE
wV
P
O OEP1CIfINCIESdPINDINGSIDENTIFIED D YES (3 No
OCcUMENTE COMMTMENTlS FMR OPEN DEFICIENCIESMFCNG.S REVIEWED 0YS DC 0Wc AND FOUND ACCEPTABLE
TM*QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM CHECKLIST
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This Supplier Quality Evaluation Checklist establishes the measures utilizedfor evaluating the Supplier Quality Program.
2.0 APPLICABILITY
This checklist applies to the evaluation of a supplier's quality program forcompliance to the requirements defined in the procurement document's scope ofwork for service activities affecting quality.
3.0 GUIDELINES
3.1 The evaluator shall be guided by this checklist and any applicablesupplements generated, as appropriate, to the potential supplier's programand supplier's capability under evaluation.
3.2 Review the supplier's quality manual (or programs) for compliance withthe requirements for the type program delineated in their quality manual andapplicable to the evaluation. Use the 'Statement Location' on the checklistto document where a particular requirement is referenced in the supplier'squality manual. The evaluator shall record any marginal or questionableconclusions or nonconformances in the wComment' spaces provided, as required.
3.3 Prior to a facility survey, the procurement documents shall be reviewedto establish:
1. The type of procurement under consideration.
2. The type of quality program required.
3. Any scheduling requirements.
4. Any pertinent information necessary, such as a unique or difficultprocess involved, a critical characteristic, or an area-requiringparticular attention.
5. The need for a Technical Specialist participation.
Effoctve Date Re*ion Supemedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 W -07-04, Revision 0 '21 0 45 CM-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4190
Tit.QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
3.4 For facility surveys, a supplemental checklist may be generated for useduring the survey, based on the requirements stated in the Supplier QualityProgram. The checklist will include questions to be asked and objectiveevidence to be identified that will verify effective implementation of thesupplier's quality program. The checklist should also be used to confirm orclose out any open or action items from the initial program evaluation.
3.5 Accomplishment of the facility survey requires a determination that theevidence offered by the supplier meets the requirements under consideration.The evaluator shall record the identification of supporting evidence on thechecklist, as well as, observations as to their adequacy or compliance withthe checklist criteria.
3.6 Facility surveys are recognized as a sampling operation. The evaluatorexamines objective evidence to verify conformance to the requirements underevaluation. The evaluator is responsible for an adequate sample withsufficient depth of examination to conform the required quality system forthe service concerned with the potential procurement.
3.7 Commercial grade supplier selections will be based on technicalcapability and establishment of QA measures appropriate to the services to beprovided as established in the procurement documents. For example:
1. In developing the QA requirements for a supplier furnishing designanalysis, the following requirements of ANSI/ASME NQA-1 would apply.
CRITERIA TITLE REQUIREMENTS
1 Organization Partial Only2 QA Program Partial Only3 Design Control Mandatory5 Instructions, Procedures & Drawings Mandatory6 Document Control Mandatory16 Corrective Action Mandatory17 QA Records Mandatory18 Audits Mandatory
2. In developing the QA requirements for procuring conceptual tests,there are no mandatory requirements from ANSI/ASME NQA-1. Optionalrequirements to be evaluated for inclusion could include Criteria 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 18.
Effecive Dato Revision Supersedes Page.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 22 i 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-OO1PROCEDURE 4/90
1-t'rWe
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
3. In developing the QA requirements for procuring laboratoryanalytical services and speciality processing, the followingrequirements of ANSI/ASME NQA-1 would apply.
CRITERIA
125689111213161718
TITLE
OrganizationQA programInstructions, Procedures & DrawingsDocument ControlIdentification and ControlControl of ProcessTest ControlControl of Measuring & Test EquipmentHandling, Storage & ShippingCorrective ActionQA RecordsAudits
1001 Isa rwim, bw bwPecwo 1gMw ffiam giuVea~bl.E d VW xamaJd by of fo to 09I10421Wbew*VQ W* scdl~f b w* zedtwMflW 41 lihed~aanmb kwialiJom. piacidla Cd *avkwQ fwt aewkf 4 t w d81
10.3 a b % *-c -e cnn0 by kdvbnk sle tAnurn. mtw puifmw 39* 1O k-q W~p~7 ______
h. Do sdh rp- if6 rPW1 irely li* wftduawv%= o*ft as mep"Jb 1w " %CA Wft
10 wft zamaor. mrarnt% or bm of mwatsr pmcslc ptccw'd peowformd Ow s&wo&
10A NI di Eprmm"edawtofprou bb~osbb or aazngcu.b hwd id by
W7 E
po3 w o n PD Sn
10.r1 he w odbrwad rma wehb r pmvedctan ryis kadoqAs w.A bo&?
10.6 Wtiu a eaiipis k woeD vef . cceptibbad aVOW E barn. k to =PW"ba p=Womda haed en10. Ynd Spndud I "e wd 1s I P15
WW hdlstalyo s
10.7 .irds" mpecln modib. WU Q*3
nip-Abt wd biwd wicki Mt hdi nomlee
mquhud. we Va eped Ia owa kmasd hIf
10.5 tb e d he P
10CTo 10.0 SaMARY COMMENT_
mq*wed &M b Vi A pub.
70.; lt phi, eu..Wr_ C edradh
fnwm4h*b * p me oevt
11.2 "i SM be*atemu aidW mpiz ub a*#& POW
W -S dv
Iii 0WI _ i balpw b*& a wpis. prod%& oft Vi Mmkilc. prewaprlon %ft Ed
11.1 ww us "1141 "Im F-
d w bm. sYio ad d d E
dtn b ~ ~~~~~~~*
Figure 3. Sample Supplier QA Program Checklist (continued).
Effective Date Revision Supesedes I Page No.
10/19/90 1 | QMP-07-04, Revision 0 31 O 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Counmw Past*_ d _SUPPLIER QUALUTY ASSURANCE149-
PROGRAM CHECKLIST FOM PAGE g OF 13
ITEM CA PROGRAM EVALUATION CRITERMA TATEf -I -U -= 4 CMENTS
11.d ft adpoodwN b1~d po.~is bf 80urqi Iiii Faweqtds b t Otle as~ km b1W1w WOK Oluedsq*b UK wwwwnsnucn Is wmhh md used
Sinn41y"" "~~~~~~~4111U
S st mW&T MNb 82w
naideS ipefiu uw idh ps i**-ogimrE
11.5 he SN h5"d ioaine raid W~ub salxVia" Ilt I"m"f h"ae 11
SECTION 110 SUMMARY COMMENSE:
12.0 CONTOL Of EASURIG AN TEST EQLPMENT
12.1 k~ messes. esU tm beSi at efd, g4,ehew In d set r ra9*4 NS #M p ea
used hi*wW wid qiulty S p" wat.ogizd dfd t d 4d ttt ided
t2 hsukhm~ayidtm eniay vi.
12. b heias d
*2J III. be V of m dni. Is d eg ib at m n t e Wad O ofd "t w- W
12.3 n SW d faasomwooSt f OWN melit Mbat2 %4d e veidw %00 mb ke_ _ _
_ eiped En #? ________12.4 Is bsesckm M1eev1104 wOrit sOM puien WsuY
b.ad lo e As raftn ulaft mpsied or Okod?
i2.5 Are moods arm~eth and fsumed aitbly maVud
SECTION 12.0 SUMMARY COMMENTS:
Figure 3. Sample Supplier QA Program Checklist (continued).
Effectve Date Revision Supersedes age No.
10/19/90 1 | QMP-07-04, Revision 0 32 d 45 |QP07-04
' YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
iT
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
OouW Pago- d
SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE II-"8"2PROGRAM CHIECKLIST FORM PAGE 10 OF 13
STATEMENT OUAXY PFGRAM TYKTEM CA PROGRAM SYALUAT10U CRITERIA 1 0 t I -_4 C- MYENTS
_ 3 OUANIDU. STOAAGE AND SU4P__
131kuaaewbhd^w(1 hk~b '._am". wiwv. dw I and PIn d sOrd SqtUmm-t ard affv4 hI rdanc wM k
Ordbu; F c bwVftwDwvr~fO
13.2 Wan msary bp pod V a eAf dro mnb, wd kinn Du arsoaw,
sef fdfedwre ambr Is _d _evrlr _w
13.3 Are Woos Iwf IWAb Ord 2QWiPmet b d WAI&Md In WwdtCs WM U0 P*Mdyft EdoodItd *Msa W mwty 2W Si b*b Ord ***w*M
12.4 k r0 *" of NOWhiciu br hMIL d bdq bc"=
_ mn Ed~ _tq _ _ _ _
13. u5 i ad.Hequt al.bib n~d reto rt n hbon r Si w d
SECtUM 130 SUMMARY COMMENI:
1%0 SbSPECT1CN, TEST ANO OPERATN STATUS
14.1 kA maures sxdW b - I NO
Otte milUbg ffau. Si Mat of inm~we Edb
I" eawad urPonkvi
dim wae sawomtdU Passed ma*gOd mapeeftiEd ju., wliai bamawy t pudi& b*Mnmmt".wM such kwpKsm Ed SM7
143 kAr masum *#eaMkhd S Wd to OFr~
bpI dbnw autde BabyWheu-aE s
t4S O~~~bsb~~dsh
13.4 W ofU.bdr"a umim Wd O .SECTO N US SUMMAR Y _Ed__UC S 1. UW~AYCUET
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 39 f 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90
rTitQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Department of EnergyW06aI owegols offce a
P a onx 13511Lo WVOWs V 391934518 EISA
V0,,1- ;s990
John I. NelsonSechnical Project Officer for Yucc Maintain ProjectScience Applications Iternational Corporationthe valley Bank Center, Suite 407101 Convention Center DriveLas Vegas, N 09109
oPLIlFED SPPLIIRS LIST (QSL)* IEvlSICR 2, APRIL 1990
me enclosed OSL contains those suppliers that ve been evaluated by QualityAssuanCt ICA) and found to be acceptable for procuremnt of item or servicesaffecting quality.
Revision 2 of the QS1 incorporates Change Notices 1 through A for ruVlieraqualified during the first quarter of 1990.
procurement all be limited to the C6L Wlliers at the locations noted forthe products or services specified. In te event restcletion apply, % willspjcify alternate mthods to caensate for supplier program deficiencies,I.e., earce srwveillance. testing after teceipt, en calibration by anapproved soure. etc.
g51L Cover page chang notices will be generated to team or incoporate uwvpproved vuppliers to the 05L as sutppiers are evaluated and pproved a an
interim wasre umtil the 061 Is revised.
If yu have aNy qstiUS, please contact Jams 3laylock of my staff at1944913.
Denuld G. Borton, VinctorQuality Assurance
Ygsa-3223 nrca mountain Projfct Office
fzclosure:06L. sevision 2
Figure 5. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms.
Effectve Date Revision Supersedes |pae No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 40 f 45 |Q -P07-04
r
I YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 429O
TWOQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
MMn B. INlsn -2- MAY 01 199
Cc:Ralph Stain. 0 1-30) fCW0. C. Shelor, 0 (3W-3) MRISJ. W. Gilray, nC, Lus Veg"as, NVD. J. Harris. Harz, Las Vegas, W, S1/1 S- 4W. D. tiviln. SUC, Las Vegas. WV S17/-04N. N. ussman, SJUC. Las VegasY, UY S17/-11J. S. Harper, SUC. Las Vegas, NW S17/T-38C. B. Prater, SAC, Las Vegas, WV, S17/1-06J. C. Vinaer, SUC. Las Vegas. W, S17,-15J. R. Statler, SUC, Las Vegas. WN, 517?-02C. T. Taylor. SC. a Vegas, Mt, S17/T-22J. E. terieni, LUC. s Vegas, N, S171-40J. S. Treadwell, SAIC, s V"eas, NW, S17,7-17
V. Voegele, SPlC. Uas Vegas. NV, 517/A-03s. v. woolfolk. LUC, tas Vegas, NW, S171-29R. J. aorich, Las Vagas W, 517/1-7
Figure 5. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms. (continued)
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page - No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 41 O 45 QMP-07-04
,A
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD1PROCEDURE 4/90
QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
amimu LIrm ST (O00me IM/90*-1
vznmAi 2, AUL 190
SOIM mm_
M=w01AW
AM ACd uc'S W
2M CIRM Mimmi aGTS, 1.
60005-4692
CLTRMNCS aCw140 WIl2 FLCinu,. aI 11116
EX.
45750
M.2411 34 ?MBW Ml93940
uOIMM rSY.
; ,Z a OMMSCN23= I
WM. SWYIC=a CMES - C~MTim a nwWa
50I U=6. SO-UTIO
StWIZESVLrATIGM a
CAMAn= I
CALELMC Qr HSS
mrT a U=LaSIS
ERADION SEVIE
ama. sNM a WTWIS
uIA -/-12/92 13
1112/19/U
U/A 3/A -/-3/93 4 MV aU/A
msmNamy xnasa00OMR oEzFC~
-/-1193 4 uIAuA
u/A N/A -/-2/33 1 WA2 010/67
rO =M DOWN= 10
IMeu7m WflZOWITM 0srECan cI 3E
D6
-/-12/92 1 *02 71/98
1 10CY990-62 fth-1
3 mlS a 45.24 C36074CIAI,
Figure 5. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms. (continued)
Efeceve Date Revision Supersedes PaR o to.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 42 Of 45 IM-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE "O
QWP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
calW" Sapp= Lin3r .APo-rw5szm 2, Aww. 1190
SU1LU Wi VICO= Uv=JI1 0% 2L_ mvzsz
as, -. .- 9-xw WI WLEl
M s-3ZCMAN. VA.19352
55-C RMWLA m". VM
6S9s
3DGL 5.w
m. D.0-
9C= r INTDu1NI £ XaMCKs
50 W
uA 01/92-.4/1 2 Ua7/21/81
U/ARL
rrO
12/ W122 4 el12/1J8/
Bk IN. wvs, wALM2883 D SYAL MM UC 3DI0=XlCIL SM,
uw n, IN 47502 AM C =s
*A K/A 021-2/93 4 WV 541d6I 0
nFM Cns:I 19=5O-62 M-1
a Awl 3 45.28 LoHEC
Figure 5. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms. (continued)
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 43 O 45 |QMP-07-04
. YUCCA-MOUNTAIN PROJECT - Y-AD-WOPROCEDURE 4/90
rut'QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Documft Page.. d
QUALFIED SUPPUER(S) UST 1148"9COVER PAGE HANGE NOTCE FORM PAGE I OF I
CSL REVISION CHANGE NOTICE EFFECTIVE DATE
NUMBER YEAR .- NUBJER YEAR
SUPPLIER NAMEJADDRESS CONTACT NAUEjInTLE
Su TELEPHONEP
L SPECIFICATION SCOPE SERVICE
A
O COOESJSTD COMM___D TO IN OA MANUAL:
010CQRS0B O NIAi13 OAHsi-w4s2
0 0 COMMERCIAL____________
00
A CHANGE NOTICE:CT 0 INCORPORAION CF NEW SUtPPLER TO THE OSL
O O REMOVE SUPPUER FROM OSLN
R LIMITATIONS, SUPPLIER VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR DOCUMENTED COMMITMENTSE
TR
T
IN
s ~C^oneadDAI
A
K-8 CowivedO
A 0 QUAIFID
O QUAoFIED WllH REEVAWATION DUE DATE AUDIT ME DATEV RESTRICTION
A 0MCT0FkC UV
Figure 6. Sample QSL Cover Page/Change Notice.
Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 44 O 45 QMP-07-04
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-OD1PROCEDURE 4/90
r-iteQM2-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST
Docummnw Papge dQUALIFIED SUPPLIERS UIST su-
DELETION NOTICE FORM PAGE I OF I
WUPPtER IIAIE:
SUPPLIER AD0RESS.' SERVMC SCOPE-
BASIS FM OELETION:
_VALUAT T DATE:
DISTRIBUIOfON:
O3c cNAL REou>RJE
F 7RE.IOUS SWPIDER USERS
TME ABIOVE REFERENCED SWPULIER IS SCHEWULED TO EEDELETED IRO r#4E COLONppOA wRammTE J~qAWZION PRIOR TO THIS DATE SHUD CNTIUD MANEAC OFTHS SUPIR BE RR
J USFI CAT ION :
SINATUJRE. | OA
O3 APfflOVE
O aSAPPD4 O0lECKCOUALM ASSRAC SDn- a
Figure 7. Sample QSL Deletion Notice.
Effeebw Date Revision Supersedes Page No.
10Jl9/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 45 Of 45 QM"-07-04