Top Banner
QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS LAB-DATA PACKAGE (<r u-,./-"- ^A Case No.: Z(Tj^S/fa (06fi. Applicable Sample No.'s: Mg. ZLOl^_ ~ ——— ""'' |: Contract No.: —""" Region: ^ . _In IL lift- ' ' ; i,' Contract Laboratory: ^c^*"! . Reviewer: Applicable IFB No.: _______ Review Date: The Inorganic analytical data for this case has been reviewed. The quality assurance evaluation 1s summarized 1n the following table: FRACTION ' VIEWER'S EVALUATION* Acceptable Acceptable with . r^pfrionU) !lu'est1 enable Unacceptable TASK I: ICP or AA , Motsle / / TASK II: Furnace AA , Motale / / . • • . TASK III: Cold vapor W 7 TASK III: Cvanlde r4- TASK III: Anraonla . -/ TASK III: *tf- *Def1n1t1ons of the evaluation score categories follow. This evaluation was based upon an analysis of the review Items Indicated below: Q DATA COMPLETENESS [] INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION .;,* , Q BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS Q CONTINUING"CAL~IBRATION VERIFICATION .[] MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS Q INTERFERENCE QC RESULTS .•'.', D DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS Q DETECTION LIMITS RESULTS Q STANDARD ADDITIONS RESULTS Q INSTRUMENT SENSITIVITY REPORTS Data review forms are attached for each of the review Items Indicated above. COWENTS: $$^ •3! •w- m'..:. —————.————— —— . ,-,^!v/l M'wl tin '* 'I '' '•'''•''• '' •''•' i .''•,'•'' '-.'.I 'ir'i'.^-.'.'A;•*:i''.' 'irijlfl;.'^', ,1 .' . . '• : '' :;r j' ' '".'•'.'•.>'•',','-!•"':;^.V;>.'.V,''• I
64

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

Nov 28, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OFV ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS LAB-DATA PACKAGE (<r u-,./-"- A

Case No.: Z(Tj S/fa (06fi. Applicable Sample No.'s: Mg. ZLOl^_~ ——— ""'' |:

Contract No.: —""" Region: ^ . _In IL lift- ' ' ; i,'Contract Laboratory: c *"! . Reviewer: .£Applicable IFB No.: _______ Review Date:

The Inorganic analytical data for this case has been reviewed. The qualityassurance evaluation 1s summarized 1n the following table:

FRACTION '

VIEWER'S EVALUATION*

Acceptable

Acceptable with .r^pfrionU)

!lu'est1 enable

Unacceptable

TASK I:ICP or AA ,Motsle /

/

TASK II:Furnace AA ,Motale /

/

. • • .

TASK III:Cold vapor W

7TASK III:Cvanlde

r4-TASK III:Anraonla .

-/

TASK III:

*tf-

*Def1n1t1ons of the evaluation score categories follow.

This evaluation was based upon an analysis of the review Items Indicated below:

Q DATA COMPLETENESS [] INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION.;,* , Q BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS Q CONTINUING"CAL~IBRATION VERIFICATION

.[] MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS Q INTERFERENCE QC RESULTS.•'.', D DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS Q DETECTION LIMITS RESULTS

Q STANDARD ADDITIONS RESULTS Q INSTRUMENT SENSITIVITY REPORTSData review forms are attached for each of the review Items Indicated above.

COWENTS:

$$

•3!

•w-m'..:.

—————.————— —— . ,-,!v/lM'wltin '* 'I

'' '•'''•''• '' •''•' i .''•,'•'' '-.'.I 'ir'i'. -.'.'A; •*:i''.' 'irijlfl;.'', ,1

.' . . '• : '' :;r j' ' '".'•'.'•.>'•',','-!•"':; .V;>.'.V,''• I

Page 2: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

. -J

QtV

A 1

J Z

r 2.

/I 1A 1

C-142-5T A 1

A 1

002143

s

Page 3: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

c-rm

f • ! •

.': Q $nmiww o/LI/okh'

Hle^WlfiA

VjFl"""

C\

1.fisft.1..:&SlKBBf.

iia»mS!way.

•• yai/si

Page 4: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

w O £y**fv.• r*»

f cUfa^ Ov, /^

CM-

(L-n? -

. fli'

<?/•r*, £>

i<« S(Wy4<'». fa-

s^*y3<^- s *-* pcon. fro ( /('-HI'/*,Kfff- iWtw

•ft/'

arotLOtv.* fcu,-cjt>\ a^Tf-ecr14 -C,1. . •,

t,

%

Page 5: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

l*~•1 .

O'

d*. j-tfcf* i 4 < ce-nW* ' «*i*

72 /£>«

-Wit!

* i*(,COM

W,

ir

i'

I

>^ • . • • • ' $i

^mvmsMK-ii; ..•Aviii'wrwfl'.ftaHsr" • •

Page 6: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …
Page 7: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

}V

M Iv fo

• c jj ctmr i . i '-.£/ j 8l)ftftft35U yw hi, f/ fMVwA IfrtlJL- WUfart/ W$} iiu' frUtl < Mk

" - li u .f- * / / /fj££jtfe&Lirt*£~£--m *

:r'3( tf /Is frVlhrjML MfrMsl (AfyjL OW ' k n l 9 tffjlftlwji* i/rtUL. I HTUJLJ] JM A/ <fo /o & ML M^ tww- "f ' ' / / i

fl

Page 8: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

u >:-!:ilHf

Page 9: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

jim 'fitvtlrfrH /Uct-rtuti . J~ t

Page 10: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

;;:iM.'i.'.::-.i.:.-.*...i»J.J~i

••••1 i «5 yTV- 2/0 yV- o tfi J1 Jjmr ^ M,

,S'3/< 3

^ tf'///lL r<L.

M /y 20$1Ltt

Page 11: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

BwffllBsialffllBlM)

....,„....

Page 12: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

• . • • \ ' c«• " \ '

!^

-:V,'';>', /;.*!m

\~

' SilSJiiyifilS ,r*r• ^ ^ ^ ft ^ MwiyF ^'."—^OTf. >.-.L....,<jK»v.«>«<i».

.: J$JEg:ittf ^

nrH tm*jtf»;%-iJ'»H "'''-"t"Tf"<i* '"'in "-'rH*" .»—niWMMtMTi*ni.itnwr •««*«*• I***!*! *•,«

| i _ .'. %'.'''{ [ Vi-i'iTa\av'7'!i\'.,!-'V.vii«'Vs:v:v:./'v''.' •..-.! . . .• ' • ' • ' '.iB;e<j3>i »0»ifi3!>&9Sjj4»>*s ^ •' 1 • • |

— ...—...,. ..~..<nMt..lif. .1 ..I••• i

,,,! ,||||t|i|

.• • .5KntV»;"i''»i''iHi ?iiiiiiJifc'« i«'Mii.'r»>*iiMTMFiii'iiiiiiini*if*thM t*t,i**iat\trki***r'<rY»(+n*:ird*i*n*K-i'ir< n»»«fn > iiiu.»- Wt»tnii»MiHBvf* 'Sft«'''JlMr»*r-*r • iti"rm">rt> n>.'J**i«n<>p(- I'r*"*

*- ,• J» f ; *1l-MtM. * 4W. W. . ^ . .A•V ^ «m rMl/Jn ifft VB ?*;* "•" t.tjl—'L.-. .*•.•• -«,.....t*»»*B.t.**«t .,,..«, ,,II;«.MI..,; aato<saa ^ .

Page 13: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

- . -

tf

., * 10-ho) **.<£

• (re4"**"' y«*>A« :' I;*&{«' '•'/K. C<a"*i-tvtvT e*"7 / v 5/t«j~l<{

>T,A 08fl5 '

fj f/'cW ci 'rtj . a^«wkf t e jaod Cc 6 ,"»,eu, „

f w M-M. zn\ "0()0051 ;|

' "" '""""rP \l ^ i

Page 14: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

fr-^

V J-^ »^ ' '• l>-•-rrrr," ~\ <[,';''•' :,A,-;,JS:<:::4p;-

.•———' •- '-'•'> '"•'•• ••.•.•''. •••'•-—,wi»l.nil

T.i'C'?,*v(cn.i';rTV"».T...> ^ "V" H- •»;7w'7.';7|i," rw'' /i«K'' »»*n-m ''. '"i-•'*;•". •• • .' "_

.... .. .<«*fl .,,(f>i>i|. inl.,.< I,." '.••v'-tfq ,«. nit*.,!....* <«!»..•«•»»...,. t,t.lUVn.. .* ...1 '.,... '...1,.. . «'.!. .•. 1

' •" i ••'•>." /•>'•">,';•,•,•• «•:../' •••..>«'i;VJl.vw,i>'(Wi,V"-.i.;'•.'/»•'..« -.• v.'-T •• :• v-..'-t- '•"-, 'X/yl ,4t- ".:a;»1<|p( «i'w OTatS ! ^ .'. -. ,:"."

' ' '"'"'" '' '

-.•r ".* :Iw.SlrV:fc'.:J'' Vii'.»<«;:.'M&W' ...... . i

..i lilSiil**

fjifi ji ^

,*X4i ;i';n%<:.&: ii;«?:.Jf;.:;-r'.-',l .>,.i;. ,

- ..:;>i)'.'> *-|1^

... ..,, .. .^ Si;,tAmtuifii fr#l<i»* ,™4lj i. « ^ . in .t»<4'iri*»W.

Page 15: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' • ' 1 1 1 " " 1 "11" ^• ,-,..,•„ ;,',\:,'*

,'••/ fl •*,/,

v'7-«:«i: ^ ™ ': i»iS"••m

^

/f2. 6C

^

.'. .'18 fjfc ' <f c -scf •

'tiWs' ' 1 ' ' 1 r ' ' ' ' • ',/ ;rt«m'o* j«rf*Hfc>Tiit(Vll' i'l"rt'* »4iJW*' ''nl'»;jtlif 1'r'J(f'1"1'-/! •>'»*«:/f**j»yr''"V/j'ri'':ii'-'..w!'..,Hv /• • '«, ....i.i.iriii.ir&i ,,.'./. •4«MMfeii,iu» .iillLiJMiiiwia.iirinnr.1i|iri.n- -,,iit»W(ni*i.t,-Wi-llW,I-o i-i-i. -i.i-"4J,-,«--r»'U,r.i..tiir-jir_jf In *«!««•» i»«»««»iiiwt'»t« w».t"». ixc^' •*•* « ••• •» i

•v liiSiife ^ •

'&

.",.','... .. * ,/r A.'i.'.i rTf""'**' 1 y"*w... ,.L' fff:. ..„! ,••? v"*'*ni5<C, y <«>'V''•Sjii'SJf.'!-'^^ ""••~i:v.l.- -"••— - .' ••;:i***»,' * y ,'"l*'ri te'*iw H" i*'V'1'W*™TW*&«'Wn*.>' ^ ;" --- • «-"•*•:'V*.1 — •: .-•frtffyz$«t&ii W!S •••«. •*.«*".,,,:;r; •;.* ,.^ fl.e i i sS Sa ifi! '* ^

. • ••^ S ^ ftlto. . . . « , „

fi

Page 16: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

o

'.<;, t

Ife

(L*.'.-> •••••»'•!': v. .;;,. r. ..,.-..!'„ :..".:M'V-t ,-;,„•...-•.•' ^ • " '' ' , .I.

TO

K

IIt

Ji'U &ifa ^ / rv i v wl-N-»- 'fA***- Ut t \ jjj(

U1»J

4 4'7-a\ i IS

o?02lST

9 000054

Page 17: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

V:\~

Page 18: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

ex •

(1.

*•..j — S-....--:! . I. ..*.«..-.„. „„. _i^_ jj _, . j a _ . . . _ •, -- -- • " _ , . - . , ........ .-

;;U''v,;.; iSi ji; ' . T ?

.3r.ns3^ ":r''~: :2*....:;.•-;•.,. 7'z,-.'-.::../..?«»

'

•,(r., ,.'..' • •,......, :.;•.,.•>... .'iJAit-..7ir.'iP;B.; ; -..r. ; • ,. . "•••.".;/.*"""•:";•..':. T;V ~jjV*jTS.' • • . ' • • " f • '. ."•"-•''.irVjij--. .., • ' '

. . . ..fev'.;ia;i:."£:' E;S!S;ii'vii i ifcv^ :!

Page 19: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

.•if •.;,,'

\- '•''~J I1ATA EVALUATION SCORE CATEGORIESACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, ORTHE DATA WHICH ARE OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROLLIMITS DO NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THEANALYTICAL RESULTS,

DATA ARE NOT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHED. ACCEPTABLE LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED ANDWITH EXCEPTIONS! SPECIFIC DATA ARE STILL VALID, GIVEN CERTAINQUALIFICATIONS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW,

QUESTIONABLE! DATA ARE' NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES BRING. THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIREDATA SET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER, THE DATA VALIDITYi IS NEITHER PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLEINFORMATION,

UNACCEPTABLE: DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOTMEANINGFUL,

002160

11 oonr.fi 7

4¥r

Page 20: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

->

'rVf''t t*>

-.'• i'1 • , "'".

V••MMBp*

\. :'•'• '••. ,\ '. . • ; | • / 7

' ' PROJECT NAME! TvAvfi (.&**X '

' /• AlO( PROJECT NO,:nP I rnoN: fftlr\v ~ QUALITY ASSURAMC

0?f6'-/$*"^ y/>._,_. yr^

pfe

MH

E REVIEW OF bV "KT . ORGANIC ANALYSIS LAB DATA PACKAGE ff —^ *-A- P.1 Jr .-

{ Case No.: "~~*-U±Contract No.: <sB~Ql -£>$(• vContract Laboratory: -filet*!. (*>pqClApplicable I FB No.: ' — — s

assurance

.Applicable Sample No.'s: g--$$~/i - $?'(, ' !Region: - /2- 1<5 ff 7- J/ff: ;fe

_ ' ,;;•fHf Reviewer; •Ar J«j96«/( I2.~ is"di iV.;>.,,

Review Date: '7/04. ^-j^er-The organic analytical data for this case have been reviewed, the quality

evaluation 1s summarized 1n the following table:

REVIEWER'S. EVALUATION*

Acceptable

-.-Acceptable with'_ixcept1ori(s)

questionable

Unacceptable

Volatlles

y/

FRACTION

Adds

I/"

'Definitions of the evaluation score categories follow.

1-7

~~ E'-'

This evaluation was based.-DATA COMPLETENESS

Base/ PCB's/^Neutrals/ Pesticides TCDD

'/

upon an analysis of the review Items Indicated below:f

^BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS QjSURROGATE SPIKE RESULTS [*

^MATRIX SPIKE/METHOD STANDARD^-RESULTS

~

DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS VEVALUATION OF CONFIRMATIONS V

Data review forms are attached for each of the review

V'"NTS• 2 35R-35

o"-*3fi

%

*<f9

R-9487

j /MpcVw^1 1 -311— R-KB8 flfTM-lo*^ K-J6fl? T\5 t .!S <• i * 3 *" TM9 II / *** «•*"/ Tfir .1 f rt^tfnf t

^"HZ/1~3lft n

;FENTATMLY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS^CHROMATOGRAPHIC SENSITIVITY CHECKSDFTPP AND BFB SPECTRUM TUNE RESULTS

["STANDARDS/•^CALIBRATION CHECK STANDARDSINTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE ,.

002181Items Indicated above.

-3£<J3-3*74

f-11/" , *-«35lS\A~\Q\r . ?" fc8s

'' /' *' U>4

8 000058r>-<o3fl ow*T«f- «o3 '7U-OIO SW^

Mf*"tiJj.-i;iSBvfit*, iyfeflfe:|

1$(''•fl

II1'(ln\'';•'••:1111':•

.,•

I'l,_ ,,....;.... - , .. .. ... , Sfj,:*'.'.);;:. v.JiV-.'r fflOi,'?-;. •

: :• , • • ' • • - ..;'i. ••'.••/'.•.• ' i.'i'Jr; '''.'''jf-'''. 1' • " . " : '.. l'\;.: ;,•'-:'':'':.) 1i i!>:M?;V,?IH'.';'H

Page 21: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

v:i

Page 22: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

oe) K-H

(ooK

r".t; •;•—*

nti*«i«««/w»a •*•**.**•••»

0. *7*53 ; "• '•''"'•'1" "• '''

v,,./.:iS ;••".•••" ••••••••«.•••••. •••••-•

.... . .. . i . .- .1 «.' . UBi.WVJ'Jy "! ^ ^ ;"/ !. t >».rf-o*Vf ••*;•.•..•'!)•• vt.' ;.M..4."

, . ,• J»\f» tT'*M*Tf"«ii( M1.MVt«i' \ * '*il*(*W1»»«>V.!«\W««iit»«»«

il?B»fpj»TJ«. ff vnffrewg ^ •'"«* .iW 'ih*. |

... ... ,..•."•'•. ..*..; ,;.•-;•'.*,••,iv,,.; tws-,. ;,.s«,,,> .• *r,»,,M« /«.'.-" ,..-..-!„.-,«-....«,.«,.«. ..-« ...- .I'- , •, ** .;t;'*'f .*lt<. .:';->.I<V>>/u .;,.,./.....

0021 3.,.......

f.vv',»•

/:.:"-;'.I't': ...1 .' -.' • •-.'. • *;!mM<tM«.<.4iif.t *".'*•*.,-."; rJ.Mw iW. 11.••*•-»«.'.;,,> .. -.

!«(!8(\"

IUl

Page 23: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

t\-*>V

;.'ty'lai J/U//- /Aw-tfy. <^ S . / tfy• --. • •..,

l )H»»«l|(J rtp»illW4MiB|« ''"'•' I

••.!•-.•.. )••.•»*-..•• >^»- .-* M J •• ."• • •• «.*. •

•i "r»,r-i'irw.rTW»i*vPn:A"y "-''<' y"IK"*'1 ^ ••> •«• \5i':?|"- :'rVi-ttcB/A!, .. 'C?.MJfr.*'*i..!??. l ,/1 :: v*~. .5w<"»3'"Uu-

.i &\*& - *iiiBiiil%fil ^

.••.,...,...•:,;: v .'Ivyyy jj-.V!-.';. '•; ''"'•":;'''-.';y;;" :;>1r-r;v .iK'; '-'•..;•'''vV.*irvi-1'' "'

;Svfc / \" a«i."u.'Z <

fe'1''

.' i ''•'.'"• .;/' 1'-': v: ''°-';'' *'lFl i?i 1'ili y -. I

Page 24: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

5f p;0 g

'.:. U^

—-•

Page 25: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

},.V' •

ffHififkliiUOUnU ——— - —— __ -™

fr *''Hpi• -• R

1 h,L. * Z. 0

4,'t

' '"•?*

" i 'WilJ iiit'SJ ^ "''" ''"'("""*.. ...n»4».;-"-—K tf f i ~'~™~«——CatuJ>.:.<g4t'c,«iti>.<«f »i.,>.i...«%l,.... .4."/v«3"H.-t /\, „———,«——.———————J*su————,.——,—————,——- . ... ... ra.............. . .„.»»....

i, S£SSiiiii ^ <

SS SMM iSISS ivi" •• - °02:83' .... -,/(

('.

r1li

',.' i . / , • )'•'• : '• ','.' ••"•'" ';-'.'''j'''v.'' '• "\'!i' 'i-i' rii:i:Vi''MV*' '. • . ..'.. .'...i-l..>.;..: !.,j :i.y;it:..l-.'..;rjL.J.!(;.ili.',Kifc.WilV(.'...."* .''•'.'•" " "i' '*' •1i'->'.v.">.-i'"./''r:1.i"';"11 'M1 '•

Page 26: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

: Sr?Si!P

•-..

*7~',...$•"kwr " ri(cj

Page 27: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

m• . • f a

CX- if/i

/1 o

...,,.,,.....,.... ..,,. .. . -.- , i/'~rwM9in«ra«»i(tjni«xAiw,i!sawi • ••

• , /, • ..•./ - irf/i.w fr (1 j»«*/ri>twi«w/.T t1wl'**t«>*; ' ?f" n* /3 '''l'a>"hru" 'A''V/L';I"CJ"'«1' i*""1"1** *. > t

'(, ~::-'r ? f "/ e/:,.i,,;5iiifeg;:S3l ^ .

' ''. ....;,,r.,.,w; -:- D^iati

A> mi.u*f,*«j>iH>t.«i,>4 ..i';u_.fl •'v-»ti* ?.',! - 1- *..f"/" MU'HV, .'• .'."••*.' ,'J.V.:;. '.vl!; ''.i1*" A..' f :; .•'.•?*.*' .•'••'f'.'i.*."* ••-

i:;:;;! . '. ;/ f M lffl« ilftilWiCTwii.mM» '"'." -i'*" ': • •'[*•• '

-|..«..-(p,«-«i;*iiiy irtUni.'f VJi i "'T7,".-.H*..v.: . •••••

. , , p , . , .

. •-'• ^ i .irJ. riu k; ^ '• - •••.-. •".,... -,:

Page 28: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

If;

V „ ., . £

n

. . .^^^ • ;"; ••;• • : •

iS ••.••-•— •' '"

. <wr.'! .TVTWv**ftflr g i< 'T rt'rn»Tn" ^ -"••• -.••••.•. ... ,

1 • ... •....•• ..-.•• ......... ............ . . . . . . ..,.,. .... , .. ,. .-.•••. .... •• . . . . . . .•..»««'J'Ti-iS.'!..;".1 -v.;;,,;. ;.ri{..>-rvr- ; .'• ••'"'..(.•"-"iif./.v.. • "V-A v . •:•.••••.•• •• •«•••••.-.• •• •' • •. ., ':.••.:: • •

! -i.'.'"!'. '-"- '''1 •",......'!• .•;•'••' ./.'.: . ••• •;'.•!;..' '"'••,;

^ '

002163

OOOOB5

Page 29: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

o DATA EVALUATION SCORE CATEGORIES

'' ACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, ORTHE DATA WHICH ARE OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROLLIMITS DO NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THEANALYTICAL RESULTS,

DATA ARE NOT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHEDACCEPTABLE LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED ANDWITH EXCEPTIONS! SPECIFIC DATA ARE STILL VALID, GIVEN CERTAIN miQUALIFICATIONS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW, 1?|

QUESTIONABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES BRING. THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIREDATA SET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER, THE DATA VALIDITYIS NEITHER PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLEINFORMATION,

UNACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOTMEANINGFUL, , i?I

' - ; • • ' • • ' ! ••• ' '•• • • '11

002170

1

Page 30: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

•</ : i;c»tfW9*ti»OTiM»*«*»'M.».l*»»»-'-- »""'i'«i|i' r •

o

• -H

•" *

•; .!*• - -'•'>• '"' "**' "•' •>'."•••' • •'• '•' 'O. ,.,...,.....,.,, ;.„..*..»,..,...,.,......„.,.,;.,/,..,.„ .:•.,, __

.' •-':•• '.?_'.' .• /•-•i.Vr-i-yi.V- ;".;:: .i'-.v-v.'v-:.vK>1"';tirV.i -Viv-, tv •''• .'•"'• • • • - • . . ' - . . • .k. •(('•.••rA.t .l>,.i| •..,»;• ;..Mi,.i.*...... l»K,v-;s ivm.iVj.i.*;v>v?1"vT.nii:.M.i;c.-... r-i-.'t';".->-;«- •:•-.;-.- ••• .*•• •-;•• -. ..-.'...,

0I 000087

Page 31: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

V

PROJECT NAME!

PROJECT NO,!n

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OFORGANIC ANALYSIS LAB DATA PACKAGE /(/' U"1'H"

CaseNo.: *- 3ji _______ Applicable Sample No. 's:Contract No.: £& ~ a ("6 7 $4- • Region:Contract Laboratory: /??£_? j dn^ Ck , Reviewer: -J n A/f /IApplicable IFB No.: —— ' — Review Date:

The organic analytical data for .this case have been reviewed* The qualityi

REVIEWER'S. EVALUATION*i

Acceptable| ———————————————————

.-.Acceptable with\_Jxcept1on(s)

Questionable

Unacceptable

*Defln1t1on•

[2G\2

Data revlevi

*P 'MTt i

nR-S

Volatiles

/

s of the evaluation score categories foThis evaluation was based upon an ana

""DATA COMPLETENESS"BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS"SURROGATE SPIKE RESULTS"MATRIX SPIKE/METHOD STANDARDRESULTS

]. DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTSEVALUATION OF CONFIRMATIONS

forms are attached for each of the rev617 ty-o/Z 9M/

^ Acids

/,

lielys

:7s

I3ew

T'Soz TV - Ol4 Surface uqxfar

FRACTIONBase/Neutrals

'

/ .

PCB's/Pesticides TCDD

-x'

/f

w.is of the revtew items Indicated below: .

^TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDSCHROMATOGRAPHIC SENSITIVITY CHECKS'DFTPP AND BFB SPECTRUM TUNE RESULTS'STANDARDS"CALIBRATION CHECK STANDARDS"INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCEk •items Indicated above.* dW fy S

ff\j

IGto '<&0dA f3fc<*H< '&*39o4 T4-Ofl " > • K-3668 -flf-ooS f Supfaf uxa&i'K-J:»oS -rtj-oo? "•

tgit TT|"O(S, '/ m.. ,.« TtJ'-rtrtiiift *Wr »F.-i'i

Wf\ TH"*

SS ril

1 ' ;

9ft& —— :: ——— T07 AVt........ jj

1iJJAfc'i.'

fi***'''

1Ik,

^|T(r ';

M mte• '::\.':j'',:.:.\'.i<--:':--'

Page 32: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

V1 nW S«:)'

l\

' ' Y / /iQMf. *i'c/i «J «_a . /ic*-- '

m

/fA. i/af* . S.X.~t-~4

£ *

<i/&—••':•••• .O'/r • - • • i..-•,..•:», '•.'.'.•.. -• .-•)'. .." • • " - '• ' • %'

I

0025.ii

(f.:

fe

Page 33: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

-ir/o- s

ui»

"TO** *•

',», T

,.° 3s-o(-____

Cnf****- p 000070

i w>li'«t*.«''*«"''fcf'i;«TiV'*'"» •. '••.••" '•• '«<-,««•••''.«-'••. ....".' i •-' . , '• ' •.-.- . ../..,. .... . . . . . / .

rr I "4 ••iy'iitf'iiiiffy i.i&'r ' fo •'« ••,'...••.•|i i«.«i:|[S«i»|J /i:!TO5<5pi^ •. •• •

'"" " " 4.'fJ.'yy/>'i*'<t'*i**i"if*(.(i'»fy. . «.rt '*«l>''|i ..'t..-- 4.t.. i.d. •(;•

»•

Page 34: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

Oft

/',; .?_N/]<:t,,i/i •k'- Jf

(I

0a*~> ,fif"

•JO (< Gfijfoit rfccVjp |

d«r 't<r

t <M • .<f"B fam

of

/t/

000071

Page 35: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

V ' f

V O

/ ,yt..

7

iertff. f<.T-t

"•• ••-•••» .n* , »»*w *- .' Wr •• '...-

..,..,l .,. ,,..rt._l2r^^

«--'>l*. -s??.r-y. li^'|."i(^ eVo>

.XV.. V,.:;

Page 36: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

1

...c/ -77C-

TO-I. C,

000073

"7.

fcfc

Page 37: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

A • (

00217«

000074

PATH pVALUATinN SCORE CATEGORIES

ACCEPTABLE; DATA ARE WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, ORTHE DATA WHICH ARE OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROLLIMITS DO NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THEANALYTICAL RESULTS,DATA ARE NOT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHED ;;i|;. ACCEPTABLE LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED AND laa

H|TH EXCEPTIONS! SPECIFIC DATA ARE STILL VALID; GIVEN CERTAIN $WQUALIFICATIONS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW,

QUESTIONABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES BRING. THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIREDATA SET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER, THE DATA VALIDITYIS NEITHER'PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLEINFORMATION,

UNACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOTMEANINGFUL,

Page 38: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

• . , . .

V'

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW FORM

'O PROJECT NAME: _••'.-.•'PROJECT MO,!

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OFORGANIC ANALYSIS LAB DATA PACKAGE

Case No.: £3 ?3_____ Applicable Sample No.'s:Contract No.: (+%•<> I ~L19V Region:Contract Laboratory: /yifffrt/-&>/«?/» .."to* Reviewer: /fcCa_ _ ftApplicable IFB No.: _______

The organic analytical data for this case have been reviewed. The qualityassurance evaluation 1s summarized 1n the following table:

"Definitions of the-evaluation score categories follow.This evaluation was based upon an analysis of the review Items Indicated below:

DATA COMPLETENESS Q"TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

FIGURE 1rr

.REVIEWER'S. EVALUATION*-•~\ ,

• •-'•'•Acceptable

Acceptable withExceptlon(s)

Questionable

Unacceptable

FRACTION

Volatlles

/

'

Adds

/Cft. /v,

Base/Neutrals

MfrlivK.

PCB'S/Pesticides

VTCDD

j/

BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS'SURROGATE SPIKE RESULTS [P'DFTPP AND BFB SPECTRUM TUNE RESULTS

\s\•MATRIX SPIKE/METHOD STANDARDRESULTS'DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS

CHROMATOGRAPHIC SENSITIVITY CHECKS

STANDARDS

CALIBRATION CHECK STANDARDSEVALUATION OF CONFIRMATIONS IM INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFQRWUICE

TH - so -013ti)-Sb.o«<rO"'1

I1al

Page 39: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

^V"

DRAFTTABLE 2

DATA EVALUATION SCORE CATEGORIES

DATA ARE WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, ORTHE DATA WHICH ARE OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROLLIMITS DO NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THEANALYTICAL RESULTS,

DATA ARE NOT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHEDACCEPTABLE LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED ANDWITH EXCEPTIONS! SPECIFIC DATA ARE STILL VALID, GIVEN CERTAINQUALIFICATIONS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW,

QUESTIONABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,- THE DEFICIENCIES BRING. THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIRE

,' . DATA SET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER, THE DATA VALIDITYvj • . IS NEITHER PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLE'

• ." • -'INFORMATION, • ,'

UNACCEPTABLE! •••• DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,'THE DEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOTMEANINGFUL,

002*83

mi: SIISliilS fe

Page 40: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

.'W.Hii-« ,,)t4....

1iI

i ! ' '\~ n

V f'','''.'

VTV""' t

if-IS

* ' ' ' ' 'l>i ^ ff *'*y«[ ^ •*•»•*• <'*»nY*'>*<* '>r;f-.

-tti/gszBZxsiyifty ^' • • ' ' • - ' ' • • • .

,-...ja- .jji L. iij«L»..i'Jjii.i.'Vi.(iiHiiai-- ri ji-v.........,....«..•.-.....jfi. jjaai.-ji,' irii:fimn1'7 lytfiiiil. -t»uiJS3«ijr"-i_-' •*5???g§?!?.SSSSS!W!Wi!• /.;liw**. iv ri/'iiK StUv* 'i< ')«f* ^ ii M' * ^ ' T-n i>iw <""".

;_

Wdtii*fas»+j*i>

"•Sf'tf •*•»,'.•'• ,v;«4.v^M... . . . . . . . . .iS*piSi «a ^

i

R1

Page 41: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

\\~

^ ''•*'

s - -:••• -•••

rr.s; ?iji>ii g;: 'liyfff% 5a ^ .-::•• •- ••••• •-••" " ' ' " r ' " • • • ' ' ' •' ••• - ••• ••""•• •••* • ' ' ' • • • » ' • • * '' • • •

ri«''.M>V i-.. .•;..,.

••''•:••% '*2Wty 33!ti &te'-,*&-\'£& '» •;•'..'• : •."•' "'••'«;j;i:wi!g*3pa3

Page 42: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

-mn»jw—-t-.-«"«---fiw-i»-i >•;;(»•,

.. m Mii miil!®,;.v-i 111

,.,„..,._. i> iii

}V V

aBj qi iji ^ •«<, ...... ...""" 'V'" ••'-'•'/,,'.' .L.. ' "•.' ',5" .-' "-'_'•„!_ Jt'lL/i' ____ -._-_. __ . ____ ' -'- • -- '' '„•-.[.... --J-i.^y JIT'.'.-.. -.. - . - .

. .•<•'••'•:•••:

IM

l» ^ »t«»Vtin.M *i>'isWt!*W '»*M<»iM<i*l»i l«**m•'iiiiii'u'»«»" iT-rt'i«*iH;ff**HrV/-»-"JI»'<T"T * ' t- **'-""*""' ••""* *•**"•.« •• .•--'. •....' '*".**i.;i'""-'lrt.'T'V i?nj'*.';",l j.;n'f'i»'A;-<!i. r. V''."V«!'.n",-:r1.""l1''J"- " ,.•'• "'• • 'I ' "" "*

TMIJW ] npH fUtftHt' mtHi KUWtfft ITTffi (1 * V",« y irfWIV ffTlTTWSJ 'Ws TTfl

/ ohffJWfi-iJttii JtriiXv-. li'tV'uV.friM

I/?/ • . ' „ 1'V'»* v ^ <»

Page 43: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

~'--1 O

- •

y; "j;!tJK:isri7S37iCTirer7Ti:v'mTT7iJMww!ni'wi»iB«.1 r" «.7.r/"-rc.:'-«..r-;w.nrjr.-".7«r(^a&i0iii5ii^—naa^* » •?•••:' .•;:*4!'«^ '.•>'.. " -i.. ......„..,,._,,.....,.......,... .

?.

,. . ..,v,—... '•«•! -',,v? r..'• .•'ji-.'>-'«".* . >..' • 'i.

;r?:rftaipi ffl$i ; j! ^ . . . . . . . . .• •i1:'->r''/i" 'C.io\l'r A' ' V-, 'rii?it ''»l*l'''1 ' '«l-'".« ' • •• ' • '

vi..;4.. . <;j 'i W, Ji, j.jl « afllrtr«iiWrC A XT Wn«r(t:tl ilfui..'w ^ ••/.'.-. •• •• •••' *'."•• .- - • I1 ' ' " , .

•**'•-. •. " ...... .. . .5(l''5W''**'f' W?''?!??'f'''''W'' wwin*ffswMji 'r((T" •*•-'.'! (>"!•-."*

pi lWTtiiw«M(w i*tiPi> sffj«p«ep»(v,'VW(«firfl i-7r :';w • •i& 'i&ffltijii&ig:XWv«fc»ts'—r tf»/O.yvv4iT ifl. • *w»6— i •feST'?oS."ii~~.r;.5tt'S,r'.7.1"lflri,v»1.' &'•,?••:'. •;•>;•;;.•".'.: 1: "'~f;.'"-;'v!frS-.'T!i'.->.-H';1'/'.- -y-' f " l.vf •: -f"- ••*.•'•. •'.5 .»>*>y ^ /;.;ff >M}./A. ;<-. v •'.••:7::: ...;:!•"

S ^ -ftS£S«l ; fc.:fe:; ;.is:,":S: ^

..,.-,',;, '-,. •-.....:•/. , .• .,;..;' : •/;.:"' » (100080

Page 44: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

V' t

lnJv»»-»*». . .

X1. ..( .(M<rri&

.„„.....,,„„, ,,,, , , |. M T-,.l .,,,l..,i.., , -.. . «J.,itgtBMMi«a;}iMe;!i'-yp-:.'1?'"-"-.-.' • '• •J.ff>tiy fa tMB.!Lll';Ia!fe< •••" •'• '•' •' •

--•!*''i;(t'ft'A.f/'t;»!V-/"V,h|Vni(W'«itM-".'.<*-<!'"!' '•- f'.;i"'/*'i""-'»J'S'l r«":'i«;'.'f——«•*—>.•. ..,*.- .*J • , U . » .... ,. -i ,. &>v tty ixi4*/i*w,*%*ww i ^ •, - .• ••• •.I.V t rM'tr? . ^ ^ -'.-.- - •••••-••... :..'• -. '

$ y $! ^Stiiri&iH Viipiiiti'W .M-rtinV'-.-. • tiMiVMiffl<'» * 'f»* *. ii* 't i 'firaH|7F t ;a'r*'y» ni*iiMi« Mra .'.f.inv....

'Vffi!n-'':'*"'' ••'- '•','';"'- trf'-"• ••.'."Vy-"!' •——— .;.-.™l«» »-... .> ..t-Vh. __•*•»••.!•:•>.'V->'.li .V.l'.'J >-:..• , I ,'.w .1-tfv ./' . '• r * - - ' -ft T (T !•! • 1/.T -" ' /'w . .S ir?* feir v; >* "/a!.:—S»i ^ ...-..,:

(fiy*.£?'4 ^ ' ''-<iiia

iiI

P

"• , '•: ;li;:WSSISHM

Page 45: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

1 ' : ' . . V '. !,• ' • • * _ _ ' • i • ' • » . . . , ;

• •:•• . - . •••>'.•/:;•<.••. •. : :p, ( ,', ' .lA; '*

wMl&m. ;.,-;:i.;*i*<1l!ilfijfitiifcjBaIS!SSssSsSjS

1

*>V

' I ^ rtym i i Wili 'i y - •• •; i' 'i ''' y< "'fflr?yy fl M' ^ <M-'..J-' <,iij."V: ••,---——————— --.-————————————.•-••.- -

:i;?;Ks''rt!:fli>3l^ •':

..i .ii w ifc'-vtBV ^ t ' jrtffB ti y ^ ay vti y rt ^ ... M*,..:,..!"..-....* 4 .„. >. i

,|2i ; li,y,a /••ygtaJCTM.i Myil ii i ^. ...\l:4'V'..°Jj,\;£;ylii J ^ ~:i'--.V.'J,'u.i(1,iJi"!'';;J...',.....'-.,•.:•..!•

••.,f <f VSj»V' *'' '. *J -'''. l'y'l''''l.'''HT.*'.ffyir;pl'V'l'l.1.''T|'''l;',V ''""r. '.".'l n'pi 1*11 1 i 'H»i. il«'ri'j<n MfTI'W i "/ 'v .*»iv"s.<..A\» .1 .... -t

1•••;.'"*"'t'i!:%«;$V:'p' .-;:• '--.•••';. .• ..'•.'..,;Vr.../;

.•;;Mii;:iis€ii;i:S

w,i/A''vaiw *'Hi>. -"Xtft( fS Vr™.T)r»%-U'f-Y1'''i '«; ''* ™'' «''' ..r-;. , «iii if'iMvtf, !t\ '*0ffMfnM tnY«ArBV ,X7 . hiri fK ^

. . .•.;;:rv:/.. ..;''!' -;;.'•;.:''"•:-:?,-•''••'j jv:1..', .•;„,'. ,' ....,-.. ........,.,....,-

. v •->>.-T ..\liiV ,;i-i'!.;-V';..Vr;t'i'.',i;k<'*viR.T?.:B;W»A'^

A}"

rk

i

Page 46: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

• K&aSt am iamSe BSt

L*-// ( L '• '<!-•"—" s /

&JUL

£ Jl-

. . . .|(ii|i>'fini»iMi'i>ii|i'ii«iiiii>ii«i"i'ii'riiii ir iii iiii'ii i'i in -nnrnir- i i5ii ^ ••• •'• ••1-

OOOOR3. . . " . . ; ' • . ' - , • . . 0 ' .

••-"::• v' ist::.- '1: ^ -. -:-;-••'•••"'.• " •. • ' '' •. ,.__..„,...... . ,. ... v,fAfl-n-,.-..t..; .. : .H,..'...,_. -> • 'i

' . !. ;•: •.:r\.i.''i*¥'1.1v!'J .';';i V'.'l'?J;1JJH:y' '•, ' :«•». ."r '-i.««w'vrtiT'''f.v;,r-"-. -»rs'ni,'fti.i «(*i. «i»-:>;(r''».l •••''' "**"'f'"-ifvn-'r'<*«"«!f}i(»i.' 'a*w

'

Page 47: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

?sagr«Wi!ffi ^ • •"•-' •• '•-•'.:,r . '-"'•'•' •-'*.•'••'".!-.'"/'.-.'.v'/.;,>-'''iw-».".-,.;,.-.-.|]'-'; ,.•"• V"W.-i:"»r.•'-;•-: .•.wj'irV'Wlvy11 '."'. '-.' • • - . • ' • V •'. i>%r*|/«Ur. rf /.> *ii v'r< *.«.*iiTrt'itT;(hv.V''rfi*iW •«-. i ,i •-...- .-.;• i. • - • r

'''**'*"^ 1 « 4 A f l ^

.. , .j ;jiift'i p'yy»'ytjii<UrtiiWTi ^ *.»' *i - n -tVi-V't.".....«"/..;.

'him:

ij*i?S««aziis«!!'v.SKii;iW.t;s™:Wi''i!i'?.;•:-: • • .- '

•.'.;.';!;-y»f,v\.irC?*;- ; 'V?'$ £ . '"-'.'• """>*' . -v-';- i-1" •.-" • ; ':-•&$v''''''&:j*&£^^ .-...J,:.i'.' :':-r?-\':.. •."!-,;: ^ i; ^ ^ ^ '

. ^ , n r » i p , ' . 1 . i i i » H . - ' . * 1 i , " " . n *MM'r» - I - i fr. - • • • > - - . ' - . • ..:".•-i'i\M™'t\*~.< :'.'+' '»V' '•<* t,i}<,*,.f#'t*'\l'',~*t \}W •*&•.!>• .I.1.. ., .... . .,i.... », '..if* u > tv,i/f<i

•;.,/ ..;;:,. ;;>..:- •.••.;,•. r,- • ..'., OOODM.,.^ ifelil feiiBf ^ '

Page 48: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

.''l s ^ ^4-i\y".,. . •••-• . •

jLnf i I/jftr • *••) 7.V I

. - . r « - ~ . * - ' v ' ^ - ••. - j.,.l,.ii 7f«i iivt .4.i l.lifcyt i|i.p>* ifc i *I AI M»l1 'y ^ - - /,> <r*i|r>f> -•.-

..'... -V -.•••rJ:vi'!''P':l*l;t';f'''-?V''.''V"'.'-i-'''; ' ''•'•'• '•;•.'"!'"!'.•' -••;«"• '..'••••."••."••,-• "-• -'-.vi' •-.- ••• • ' : •.-. • •"• •*••; •i*y.-ft?Zr. i~-,*;*wi&*X&M&v&x ^ • »•••;.."••• —

. ., i;;.vr.'."t...'; ftoXi't'$wt t!WA"&wfr'iU?>tl ~'"»X''-f **'••>'n"''?""*' .-(»ij;\wm'«.'Wii?;w.«<rt V'ii;.fr«'i T.'A;..i.. ••. -.... .-.<• .. > ....,....'. -(.,H' |' .i i|fillliBt'lMI»llB»llff*i<)min*lU''i»*«HPW"«"»1H»»|TM*mr.inilU*B iil.ilil.illli nmifMi ll tm nilniaiiiinTa-mnrr- irr - -nr TrrvTrrrThif- - --f •" !3:at;:'3;z!p£:2x::,.-.j;;. ;*™"-'-: M~-~^ .; .!T.:....--.-..;.._ • i

. ,:-j!ii,:I:i;:<|i;|gUWWji'^ ••••• ••••-" .-.~i »s:iV.w , •

ljyjttjlfiit(jMM hMiit<<»ill fr/lic •• r—'

,•;'•;'••'•••.!; ;-,v V>vr,i '•'!•*?!*• "•V/','.1:;,';-'1.?-;'.1;''.'•';;•'' ..'V- ••.-•''"-'("' 'J-,t1.1«',(h'i':V"'".!;'';" ' • - ^•1-'>t ;--'.l''":'1JC''' '•',•' • -'" ' ', S/ i /S®i!";SiiiiiS!;5 ;" 'V-tx'.'( '

• ' '•jf£Vi'i'*S<»k'ii feV£-X •••"-n u ™

••.••*':•'.;•.•• '','••• . •• $*.$tfftft'&3&-'x',K^

Page 49: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

:\ f i.,..J. -

;i Vr if r i f ? w J.tim *vJr T? •

V i

V >j *i»< ^ n fik yiiyf/iit ii ii

i :::: >^Mj-.il'£S!Gfyf**ty.&pi ^ •'>,>

••••!»•••". s. •.-.

!«t,rtj«-«* t(Sj,OTj«*» j(j|WtV*'r*.Ji.ii-ij»;.."*-*ir»'in! •->•««•—«•• .. >-* •> . .,.-.. .,.• .. t

irtvV'vJ- .•-••*'«-..• -::.w',~l.,'f.- .'•;!••.'•.-."„ -V "".'*•'• '-. ' !(iti.wri.,vwuv-. :/,wuiMU«.c.-.-.i"-'t";i.i "'i;'•' '/*• • :- ••"—....-'• ."• c ••;; ••••'• . . . . . . . i .ft'f.. »»,'»i..iw.-j'**Mf***n1>'in« ':''|('i':.'V'iM'»'i.j'*i*i.,.'.t(«." i. t»'(t...-, . , .• .... .• . .... i

"ttflMMtSfcvunt J(f,Vl1.'rti«»1*T.Tlt.'V( -I •.*!•*.

. \.«xSl.'..in.-, -•'-,.. ;••'-vs^ " ' ---•-•'••—•"•--•••••-•--•--•-—-—--•-- — --------

A i... «• ' ' • ' ' " *

ITfJI;.'••<j. j.: "&•-

w»pi'Way

P#5

• •Hv'vicVT.vV.l .'/rvi .vV p Vrt y'f EV'fog W. 'SiUfr* lYfl »-lll

'*"' " '•-'••' •'«V'-i.v"'W'..'':**'V''fel!!f&l{*>%

Page 50: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

T».>f H''!>r\f ::;.>•„ ..,„.,„_,.

• i

O QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF

PROJECT .NAME!

PROJECT NO,!

j • ORGANIC ANALYSICase No.: 2.iiiContract No.: ,6 (-61 4-Contract Laboratory: KkddL CyMfaC^Applicable IFB No.: ——

i The organic analytical data forassurance evaluation 1s summarized In the fo

!i

1

REVIEWER'S. EVALUATION* Volat1

Acceptable

Acceptable with . ./—, Exception) s) ^'•*~S

' • Questionable >

! "" """"Unacceptable

i> "Definitions of the evaluation score categorii

This evaluation was based upon a

~2 EATA COMPLETENESS' JLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS^'SURROGATE SPIKE RESULTS|— ixM/VTRIX SPIKE/METHOD STANDARLinJESULTSQjWPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS[^EVALUATION OF CONFIRMATIONS

Data review forms are attached for each of th

BRENTS: < a ' itjj} s/uefcw

~~ i«u ( *lfe> EworW °^ «

S LAB DATA PACKAGEApplicable Sample No. 's: <J S'i'1 S»'»yo6»t.Region: > ft is1/ 7- Z2.Reviewer: • ^ -f'adlReview Date: f/?6/0f

this case have been reviewed. The qualityllowlng table:

FRACTION. . . .Hc Base/ PCB's/les fields Neutrals Pesticides TCDQ

/ / s

~T~/' '_,//:

es follow.n analysis of the review Items Indicated below:

• [ TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS^ CHROMATOGRAPHIC SENSITIVITY CHECKS"'TJFTPP AND BFB SPECTRUM TUNE RESULTS

D ~ STANDARDSQ'CALIBRATION CHECK STANDARDS[TflNTERNAL STANDARDS PEWfBlRMfiNJCE1 — ' ^ift'-v

e review items Indicated above.

—————— r ——— 0001 7 ———————(V~v Kr«flM~ icu*C /«=»«.

R-3SH l -SIO.ts-ioW R'3S2'« T</"#* (.&-t)J,«"»«• Tj-3/iv x .jjR-Sflil Ttf3»i to-4><L-*-Tjr AH 1V-3I+ C1rJJ\r , 1

55*1- -n "3IS ' CS-«*>- --—•—-- -• -— I

"" jj " .:':t "; ; ;;; :i':if|ilt

JWj(>

"'|:'- t1>'i - i ..TI'.I.:

I;#1

I1II1iiPiis5??•'i{•'

fcr-U;!'>ik;f't .•f',i''':

Page 51: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

viV.

fc

7/7

JC

Z)«-

t,

H-71-

1000088

1

a

Page 52: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

imy maaar am

c-*U. r<J S (Sft-dy- ff-

et wv zs^" r<c0<'<"yf 01

. , ^vt -. ( ( c / t .^""''''*'!'11'"'''* «"•«*""*•» •.~">4<»v.'>1!*»""'' •!»•<" .w-."'i A- .',— •. - i- •• "

^ ^ •••••'-

.tfvi. ... a. A,., c t, ..Cot/*/

. ..' - j -'i'

;. |,.,,,-,--:- ;.0, ].:r,.. .. .: ,. • ," •.,....:,.;..•„..:• 8

Page 53: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

I\- '

V' o

"\

5-6w

Page 54: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

oJ5i'te>C

,U I "Ml -£*?•

f 7'-P/

i i i— (oo(<{ VfH tfiaaffy

(1% i (fr,

.7

-L ft

'

Page 55: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

t I . ........... .jwaHnw?1-**

VV': n

-s.T

(2.-

'•• .xim/i'ftWi ifciJSii ^ •^ ' '" "S!!!!!!!!; :T>" .~ -!

. .'"".V.,". ''•-:'":, .iv r'&jY

........ .

./?••»«• --t .. • • •

1> ' •lly

•H

Page 56: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

V DATA EVALUATION SCORE CATEGORIES

ACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, ORTHE DATA WHICH ARE OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROLLIMITS DO NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THEANALYTICAL RESULTS,

'•i'f»;

DATA ARE NOT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHED It,..ACCEPTABLE LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED AND »«\-iWITH EXCEPTIONS! SPECIFIC DATA ARE STILL VALID, GIVEN CERTAIN

QUALIFICATIONS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW,

QUESTIONABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES BRING THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIREDATA SET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER, THE DATA VALIDITYIS NEITHER PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLEINFORMATION,

UNACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOTMEANINGFUL,

Bjfei

Ill

llI

11$jpi_j#,l»y"j!

''u'aa-'i1:H'vi\t ,• i'V'.>.t(V.;f'**'•

,l..ll

Page 57: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

PROJECT NAME: T

PROJECTNO<!X*

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEH OFORGANIC ANALYSIS LAB DATA PACKAGE 7

Case No.: _ * .O_____ Applicable Sample No.'s:Contract No.: fcg'-<3/-67f5'4 Region: j____Contract Laboratory: flltfal (',Cb Reviewer: - .Wrf /( __ __ __Applicable IFB No.: — • • • - Review Date: "t/j

The organic analytical data for this case have been reviewed. The qualityassurance evaluation Is summarized In the following table:

REVIEHER'S. EVALUATION*

Acceptable \J

Acceptable with'-• Exceptlori(s) • ' V?

Questionable ' ?

Unacceptable ryy

FRACTION

Volatlles

i/

^Definitions of the evaluation score categories foThis evaluation was based upon an ana

2. DATA COMPLETENESS|] 'BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS* 'SURROGATE SPIKE RESULTSnfMATRIX SPIKE/METHOD STANDARDLJ. RESULTSn/DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTSQ EVALUATION OF CONFIRMATIONS

Data review forms are attached for each of the rev

/Acids

/

Base/ , PCB's/Neutrals Pesticides TCDD

x / •

/ / '

How.lysis of the review Items Indicated below:

I ^TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS"^CHROMATOGRAPHIC SENSITIVITY CHECKS~2_ iHPP AND BFB, SPECTRUM TUNE RESULTS"'STANDARDS

^CALIBRATION CHECK STANDARDS^INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE

lew Items Indicated above. . fj,Q'2l'*

4632. TV-Zo"* 1 R-3i66 T</-/07^ R-J6M Bt A//(/R.363o Ty-^iH3/ 12-3*67 ry-io«//R363I T/-2I3 f R3C6S TV-206/

!:

fc onnnpfnj'

r! ''" ' : , . - • •• - •: '•'•, • '-'.•'•'• '-•-•• ',; •'0 ." f-'v' h'-i ' ' ' .' - . - " •',.".'. ;•;•,.'-. •.V'.'1'',;- ' ''y',r.*',Jvi

• • ' , - • , . . ' , ' ;•',•(!';.. '"''•' ''tp'1'','-!''!1'.'.'''*,1-• • , , < . ...•• ,.• :, •• i,-.;r!'.M.," .v.. •{•• , p ' . .',-: . ' . " . .' i,1 ': . "''i ''i-i. •. '.'.', . •'!. • • '> ;'.."''.• "'•','>••'

Page 58: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

X)

f)

H.-W

~ fiff><-t

•«/

000093

-, ..- ftr*-** /""fi di'lfjt

«i~\ '

Page 59: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

i -

;j, tA/u.

«JHb

» D / 'i ', / </ i /nfifflicWi i/»( Wt i o/( OuTy. i ! r

Jaffa. t^^ c-^^/ A*

..-./?%. X-V^• • - • - • • • • • • • • • • • -

'' n 44 '.'' '' • 15"a ooonqg

&

Page 60: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

- Zett

- t~e((

'«/v ''**•/?'ns*«\ L...I.".•••v« >*< /.....'• -.1 .,.•!, . . ........ ...... .

. .:••'.:r-r •.-:.•

v . * . . , , - ™ , . .

^

'• ~ - ' •' • '"•"• -.-/.-.';.v;.'.r.'p;'. - '.'.•' .'; 'lfl',*4."..'"l,ov/•^ '.J','

Page 61: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

is!/"—

1 •'•'••' •y wv'..-' •?•'• *•*••• •'• i"'«""• .•'/,-"-.•-'.'..

•8 000098

r*i.i.

?«'lit Amiw

Page 62: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

%y;V 0 DATA EVALUATION SCORE CATEGORIES

____ DATA ARE WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, ORTHE DATA WHICH ARE OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROLLIMITS DO NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THEANALYTICAL RESULTS,Ml

DATA ARE NOT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHED if!,1. ACCEPTABLE LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES'ARE IDENTIFIED AND yfe|WITH EXCEPTIONS! SPECIFIC DATA ARE STILL VALID, GIVEN CERTAIN

QUALIFICATIONS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW,

QUESTIONABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS.THE DEFICIENCIES BRING. THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIREDATA SET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER, THE DATA VALIDITYIS NEITHER PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLEINFORMATION,

UNACCEPTABLE! DATA ARE NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS,THE DEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOT' •'MEANINGFUL,

Page 63: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

. . - . - ' .

1 • •" " ' ' "•'

V o"v r/0/vCase No.: J? 7/f! ' i

\ Contract No. :' *" f*AContract Laboratory: Cwi

Applicable IFB No.:The Inorganic e

assurance evaluation Ujj

REVIEWER'S EVALUATION1

| Acceptable

Acceptable with .!pipt1on(s)

1 Questionable

Unacceptable\

--

f PROJECT

J* PR

QUINORGA

m/asf

NAME: /OJECT NO,!

\>,,;. , . _ _ ; _ - ' ' 1

. ,(. ..'..'.. .k»»u-,.«l.|s|. aGfejue*.

ALITY ASSURANCE REVIEH OFNIC ANALYSIS LAB DATA PACKAGE. / s

Applicable Sample No. 's: fa£j>,5l:iLz_0$3ARecRe\Rev

1on: 7?«**

1ewer: PButo)£lew Date: V/W7V

nalytlcal data for this case has been reviewed. The qualityummarlzed 1n the following table:

FRACTIONTASK I:ICP or AA

/'-

TASK II:•urnace AAMetals

/

... . ...

TASK III:Cold vapor A/

.

.

TASK IIICvanlde

*

TASK III: TASK III:Annipnl3 suifide

^Definitions of the evaluation score categories follow.i1

This, evaluation. .was based upon an analysis of the review Items Indicated below:1 , :"'.'•••

! 0DATA COMPLETENESS J2f INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION ,

1 (•f BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS jjj CONTINUING "CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

[/{'MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS [v/f INTERFERENCE QC RESULTS|]/| DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS [^DETECTION LIMITS RESULTftQR^'l

i Q STANDARD ADDITIONS RESULTS Q INSTRUMENT SENSITIVITY REPORTS: Data review forms are attached for eaclr of the review Items Indicated above!* * &*****

; C ENTS: \jt! s re*t / n ; pb «' Ifwit* www fe CwwMuJ. thttift™HjL f<Mwu£">'fi ftm. C0yniMl/U<t+r\ */ l*ttJ dMjJu»JZ» MR Osll-IYIfost.0*J MlttS-Jall/aJjLtmtML. IbrdqC wJMl 'q*tvUL

VlR.osr?.(J fcPfofinikAt. !/>-2o70 w/ /WWL. VAMtto ifri fofot- ifofovn.ifot, . (LvfaWL b

tfa* AJmL/ AeJ7 faJ<Mj&t UA*

.-«/*

.Ji '•'. : :>Ik'MfjUOMtffrUi*- fat- 1

rr V '

'••: .'. '•'..,•,;•' " ' .v i i/S Sfl

'''•''-•'••.••:'::''JM^, ,/; ;' ;.';;::, ;.v--i:Hi: i\;1®f|'f

1jjWw)

%I ; ,'•'* ,

tem

|11111iii1|l111

1i-:'l

1

Page 64: QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF V ' INORGANIC ANALYSIS …

\- • n DATA EVALUATION SCORE CATEGORIES

ftcCEPTABLE! DATA IS WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS^ OR THEDATA WHICH IS OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITSDOES NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF THE ANALYTICALRESULTS.

• •.- ' DATA is NQT COMPLETELY WITHIN ESTABLISHED. CONTROLACCEPTABLE:.. LIMITS, THE DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED AND SPECIFICWITH, EXCEPTIONS! DATA IS STILL VALID, GIVEN CERTAIN QUALIFICATIONSWHICH ARE LISTED BELOW,QUESTIONABLE; DATA is NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, THE

DEFICIENCIES BRING THE VALIDITY OF THE ENTIRE DATASET INTO QUESTION, HOWEVER; THE DATA VALIDITY ISNEITHER PROVED NOR DISPROVED BY THE AVAILABLE'INFORMATION,

llNflrr.EPTABLE.!

'••J

DATA is NOT WITHIN ESTABLISHED CONTROL LIMITS, THEDEFICIENCIES IMPLY THE RESULTS ARE NOT MEANINGFUL,

OOO;HU