cctsi.ucdenver.edu Quality and Process Improvement Program (QPIP) David R. West, PhD Member, CCTSI Executive Committee Professor of Family Medicine, Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Public Health
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Quality and Process Improvement Program
(QPIP)David R. West, PhD
Member, CCTSI Executive Committee
Professor of Family Medicine, Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and
Public Health
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Specific AimsReview
• Aim 1: Identify and remove obstacles to efficiency and process improvement in priority areas
• Aim 2: Form clearly identified and empowered process improvement teams
• Aim 3: Link with evaluators to ensure efforts are complementary rather than redundant
• Aim 4: Integrate quality and process improvement into CCTSI governance and decision-making structures
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Goals
• Efficient use of resources, streamline processes and eliminate waste
• Eliminate unnecessary variation to maintain the high-quality and client-centered delivery of services and support
• Achieve cost-savings that can be reinvested in mission-critical aspects of the infrastructure and environment for CTR.
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
A Word About Quality and Process Improvement
• Requires fidelity to stakeholder ownership
• Must follow a structured process to:
– Define scope (Logic model)
– Define Timeline and End Points (Project Plan)
– Engage process owners and stakeholders
– Fully understand current processes to be “improved” (process mapping)
– Process Owners publically espouse process revisions (not the QPIP team)
– Formal implementation and rapid cycle revision/improvement
– Accountability to Sponsor (Exec. Committee and PI)
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Year 1-2 Priority Area
Clinical Research Support Center (CRSC): Assist the CRSC to develop and implement work flows and support for pre-study approval and ongoing compliance .
Process Owner: Dr. Alison Lakin
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Pre-IRB Review Process Improvement
• Goal:
– Unified Pre-IRB review process for CHCO, UCH, SARC, and UCD
– Single port of entry for all investigators
– Single approval letter for all protocols
• Many fits and starts
• Human Subjects Research Portal went “live” 8/14 (www.UCDenver.edu/HSRPortal)
– Ongoing adjustments throughout the fall
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Next Priority Area
Three options considered by the Executive Committee:
– Biostats support through the BERD
– Leadership training and pipeline programs
– Community engagement training and partnerships
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
BERD Process Improvement Progress to Date
• Define the scope– Create a logic model (in progress)
• Identify and engage the process owner(s) and stakeholders (in progress)– Dr. Nichole Carlson (process owner)
• Fully understand the processes to be improved
– Identify the process(es) to be improved (complete): Intake, Triage, Investigator-Biostatistician Match, and Project Management (including billing)
– Initial process mapping underway (next slide)
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Response to EAC Critiques
• The EAC at its last meeting encouraged the CCTSI to hold all partners accountable for their pieces of the IRB pre-review process, including one particular partner that generated a great deal of discussion.
• Problems not entirely solved, but have been clearly isolated – putting pressure on that partner to redesign its internal processes (underway)
cctsi.ucdenver.edu
Questions for EAC
With Regard to BERD, Appropriate Performance Metrics?
• Reach: Number and “type” of investigators
• Productivity # of projects completed/FTE of biostats) # of Funded Grants # of published manuscripts Drop-out rate (# of projects w/ initial consultation only) # of Abandoned Projects