8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
1/36
S# Date Location Surveillance Description Category SATIP SAIC DisciplineStanda
Catego
30111/11/2007
6:51:19 AM
6" DGA-1371,sht. 3 of 6, spool I to K is
3mm close to 3 number columns. A
violation to Aramco standard SAES-L-310
ara. 12.4. SP to verif for ossible
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
30211/25/2007
5:17:42 PM
Pipes are used as support to another
pipes. The lines are: 1)DGA-1287,near
FB-07 col. 7 south. 2) DGA-1338 bet.
columns 7-8 & 9. 3) DGA-1413 8" bet.
col. 6 & 7 middle column. 4) DGA-1293
20" bet. col. 11 & 12 south. 5) DGA-1327
16" bet. col. 19 & 20 north bet. PR 15-15
and fin fan cooler. 6) DGA-1299 24" bet.
B65-C-102 and PR 15-16 and on the
su ort one rust cs bolt is touchin the
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2022 Mechanical SAES
30311/27/2007
1:00:19 PM
Two installations that needs modification:
1) Pipe 2" CS, DGA-1482 spl. AI is
clashing with 1" SS pipe DGA-1459 spl. C.
Note: DGA-1482 not yet installed when
DGA-1459 was hydrotested. 2) 1" SSpipe DGA-1459 spl. B - is resting on
su orts without SS ad. SP to modif
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2022 Mechanical SAES
30412/30/2007
7:09:19 AM
Remove fabricated reducer connected to
thermal oxidizer stack B65-F-104.
Violations to SAES-L-105, SAES-L-310,
SAES-L-101. Reducer to be installed shall
com l ASME B 16.9 ASTM A403
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2006 Mechanical SAES
3051/23/2008
7:05:09 AM
Entire steam line header S-1781 has
been fully insulated prior to pressure
testing. This is a violation to SAES-L-150
ara 7.3. All oints shall be ex osed rior
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004
02SAIC-A-2015 Mechanical SAES
3061/29/2008
7:55:30 AM
Contractor has pressure tested test pack
B65-2-TLTP-050 with lube oil as test
medium instead of demin water as per
approved test pack. Contractor shall
issue RFI for cleanin and de reasin the
Violation-After The
Fact
NA NA Mechanical Schedul
3074/14/2007
11:48:33 AM
Found, MAC Welding Machine with
overdue calibration (SN: 496R10031,
Model: Mega Arc 5040D, LAST
CALIBRATION: 27 Jun 2006) Schedule
for re-calibration ASAP Accom lish SAIC-
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2011 Mechanical SAES
3084/9/2008
7:18:25 PM
42" Valve 64-ZV-01 installed on piping #
42" P-1297 showed leakage from body
joint during the Hydro-testing of the
piping system Test Package # B68-2-
603. The valve shall be removed and
repaired in an approved valve shop. Field
hydro-testing shall be applied on the
valve prior to its installation in thes stem. Please confirm b test records
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004
02SAIC-L-2015 Mechanical SAES
3097/24/2008
8:30:23 AM
Contractor GAMA has demobilized all its
welding, piping, and Mechanical
Inspectors with out following any
demobilization plan, prior to the
competion of construction activities
violating the requirement of Schedule-Q.
Problems are being faced to verify the
remaining construction activities such as
installation of PZV reinstatement of lines
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical Schedul
310
12/12/2007
11:02:16 AM
Contractor has proceeded for chemical
cleaning even though the hydrotesting
was not accepted by ID. It is SAPMT and
contractor responsibility to repeat the
test (for the small section that failed) orprovide the waiver as per last meeting
with PQM. Otherwise, the whole job will
be re ected and MCC will not be si ned
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004
02 SAIC-A-2015 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
2/36
3118/13/2008
2:48:06 PM
This is with reference Sales Gas
Compressor after cooler B68-E-102
A/B/C/D. Approved Drawings for 2 Vent
& Drain Nozzles of the Tube Bundles
show LWN flanges of 600# rating while
the Flanges installed are ASME B16.5,
300# rating. Vendor Nuovo Pignone has
provided the calculations and revised the
drawings supporting this change of
flange rating. It is advised that design
calculations submitted for 300# Flan es
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical SAES
3121/5/2008
7:26:03 AM
Surveillance conducted on B68-1 area
found out that during re-instatement the
contractor are using teer pull and come
along to align the two flanges. The piping
circuits are 48" with line no. P-1003 and
P-1007. Misalignment tolerance as per
SAES-L-350 was 2.4 mm and actual
dimension for misalignment is 100 mm.
Contractor are not requesting for any
inspection for flange alignment and
parallelism. The contractor was advisednot to force the line that will affect for
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
3131/19/2008
1:30:23 PM
Inspection of Strainers for the suction
piping of compressors B68-K101/102 has
shown that partially cut wires of the
screen, gas cutting/welding flux deposits
entrapped inside the corners of strainers.
These debris can get detached and enter
the compressors and cause damage to
the machine. It is advised that the
strainers installed on the suction piping
48" P-1029-3CS9P & 42" P-1297-6CS9P
shall be removed and inspected for
mentioned defeciencies to avoid any
damages to machine. The welds made
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2017 Mechanical SAES
3144/10/2008
7:47:07 AM
FB-30 & FB-31 of piping 2" IA-1586-
3SD0P showed leaks during the
Pneumatic testing at 125 Psig test
pressure. The number of 2" diameter
stainless steel butt welds that leaked
during pressure testing is now 7 and the
recent leaks like previous welds are from
the edje of the weld. Although failure
analysis results are awaited from CSD we
should complete the necessary
investigation from our side.Welding
Records, Material certificates, welding
consumables certificates and fillers from
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004
01SAIC-A-2021 Mechanical SAES
31512/4/2007
7:25:03 AM
Surveillance conducted and found out
damage face on check valve when
disconnected prior to hydro
test.Transverse scractch found caused by
weldin s atter. The contractor advised
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAEP
3165/15/2007
6:33:44 PM
2x2- Seal drain lines buckled up to
approximately 7450mm (1st Riser)
elevation and a 3" flange detached from
its tack welds during the course of
rigging, mounting of the stack risers (1-
5 to its anchor bolts foundation.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-A-2010 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
3/36
3179/12/2007
9:36:42 AM
During the inspection for FAFCO record
for humidity and temp we found them
copy paste from last three days, because
they dont have instrument for that.
Snam. Should take immediately action
about the contractor and the C.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-H-100
01SAIC-H-2026 Mechanical SAES
318 9/11/20069:01:09 AM
Blasting garnet in the coating yard shall
not be stored on the ground. This does
not com l with SAES-H-100 ara.5.2.1
Violation-After TheFact
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2025 Mechanical SAES
3192/18/2007
6:58:25 PM
It has been observed that burried Pipe
lines crossing the fence with roads on
both side of it are placed on concrete
pedastals. This is in violation to SAES-L-
460 Para 10.2 and Standard Drawing AC-
036660 sheet 4. Concrete Pedastals can
cause dama e to the coatin which
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2019 Mechanical SAES
320 5/27/20063:34:57 PM
While conducting Surveillance at pipe
rack no. 8 & 7 the GAMA are pulling 24"
double ended coated pipe and found out
that the paint are been damage not only
scratches but severe damage. The paint
crack and peeling-off not only top coatbut primer also. Its been observed that
the rollers are not fitted to used for
heavy pipes with coating ( Epoxy Paint )
The contractor advised to use another
type of roller like rubber or equivalent
Violation-After TheFact SATIP-L-350-01
SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
3214/18/2006
2:29:59 PM
4 double ended 36" pipes that already
cleared on RT are already delivered at
site with out cover at the end and already
have debris inside. Violation on Aramco
Standard SAES-L-350. The contractor
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2017 Mechanical SAES
3226/30/2007
7:53:35 AM
Petrol Valve Gate Type 40" Diameter
150# showed a leakage from a through
defect from cast steel body of ASTM 350
CF8M material on application of testpressure of 425PSI specified for shell
testing. This faillure is not acceptable as
per the requirements of 04-SAMSS-048
Para 6.11 & 6.12 API-598 Para 3.9
Violation-After The
FactSATIP-L-108-
01SAIC-L-2042 Mechanical SAES
3235/15/2007
9:15:22 AM
Contractor is completing Flange Joint
with out implementing the flange Joint
Assembly procedures approved for the
project and the requirements of SAEP-
351. NO RFI is submitted for PID
violatin the re uirements of SATIP-L-
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAEP
3244/3/2007
1:53:46 PM
er oroug nspec on, o o we ng
machines are in violation of Sch. Q
pertaining to calibration. See Sch. Q
attachment IV para. 6.1 therein specify "
calibration cycle of any equipment notcovered by standards shall not exceed 6
months. For GAMA: 9 each no calibration
stickers, 1 each cal. expired and 5 each
with 1 year calibration. For FAFCO: 8
each no calibration stickers and 4 each
calibration expired. We asked FAFCO
supervisor Mr. Jojo how the W. machines
are being used without calibration, he
replied calibration is not required for
welding structural supports and has been
agreed by Aramco 10 months ago,
FAFCO must produce copy of said
agreement. W. machines shall be
calibrated properly and shall have sixmonths calibration cycle. GAMA must
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2011 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
4/36
3254/7/2007
5:42:09 PM
Snam Welding Inspector Mr.
Laksmananan Manikandan is currently
conducting inspection in main pipe rack
and he is si nin WDR. This is in violation
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical Schedul
3264/11/2007
8:54:22 AM
Pipe support sadle #SU-013 not in full
contact with the support/rack and do not
carr the load.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
3274/26/2007
4:09:42 PM
During the review of drawings for the
utility piping systems prior to hydro
testing it was observed that no Root
Valves are provided on the take off
connection from main header as per the
requirement of SAES-L-310 para 19.6.
Further the Contractor shall verify that
ALL the reqirements specified on section
19 of SAES-L-310 are com leted rior to
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-350-
09SAIC-L-2080 Mechanical SAES
3286/27/2007
7:50:08 AM
No Flange end covers of 3 nos.
Masonellan MOV valves, 6" class 600,
dust is building up inside due to
continuous sand storm. A clear violation,
much more for this type of MOV valves.
See SAMMS-04-035 para. 12.2. Notethese valves was installed in line on FGH-
1131, but was removed due to the
flushing activities of the line, but it was
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-108-
01SAIC-L-2041 Mechanical SAMSS
3298/21/2007
6:58:34 AM
During water filling of line P-1049 it was
discovered that 36" valve S/N 50461, Tag
no. VS-GA-E-60144RF, SAECO tag. no.
4679 has leakage through pinhole on
bonnet, see 5 photos attached. It is
believed that it has been filled hyddro
tested by SAECO noting that it bears
SAECO tag number 4679. The incident
shall be investi ated b SP with
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-108-
01SAIC-L-2042 Mechanical SAES
3309/9/2007
7:25:48 AM
Installed size of pipe branch P-1103 is 1"
and was based on old isometric dwg. no.BD-455411 dated May 2006. Whereas,
new revision no. "OA" of same drawing
and P&ID dwg. no. B72-ba-540838-002-
0F3 indicate that the pipe for branch P-
1103 shall be 2". Sp to verify and modify
the line. Note: Branch P-1103 is part of
test pack B72-014/3"-P-1035 which was
successfully passed the hydrotest on July
31, 2007 with RFI dated July 30, 2007.
Test pack B72-014 shall be re-
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004-
02SAIC-A-2015 Mechanical SAES
331 10/25/200710:51:22 AM
Cut and reweld of joints FB26, SB29 at
K.O. 72-D-101 after it was successfully
hydrotested and accepted. The joints arepart of package no. B72-900B which was
hydrotested on Sept. 9, 2007. Re-
h drotest is re uired after modification
Violation-After TheFact
SATIP-L-350-01
SAIC-L-2013 Mechanical SAES
33210/28/2007
1:48:16 PM
Miss match of flanges not acceptable as
per standards SAES-L-350 at line BD-
1301, FB-16 & BD-1303, FB-01
connected to pump flanges B72-G-101B.
A violation to SAES-L-350 ara. 9.4.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
5/36
33311/5/2007
7:36:22 AM
Original installation of branch B72-P-1103
was 1" based on old IFC ISO dwg. BD-
455411 sht. 1/2 dated May 24, 2006.
The subject branch was changed from 1"
to 2" on last week of October 2007 based
on latest revision of ISO dwg. The
concern branch was part of header 3" P-
1035 under package B72-014 which was
successfully hydrotested and accepted on
July 31, 2007. SP to conduct retesting
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
33411/13/2007
6:42:09 AM
During Reinstatement Inspection for TP
B72-072 conducted on 09 Nov 2007, PID
Inspector has found a wrong valve
installed on line 2" RL-2671, wherein the
installed valve was Globe Valve and
required valve should be Gate Valve.
There was no pretest punch, and the
installed valve is complete with the
correct gasket (yellow colored handle)
and bolts on final torque . GAMA and SP
ins ectors has missed this item but was
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
3354/27/2006
4:21:25 PM
On the job surveillance at GAMA Shop it
was found out that one of the 36" pipe
that already fitted had been damage in
hauling which is acceptable but the worst
thing was the damage inside. It was
intentionally grinded with a 30mm x
50mm a rox. The i e is now re ected.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
08SAIC-L-2034 Mechanical SAES
3365/15/2007
6:56:07 PM
PMCP packages are submitted with out
any punch list from the contractor side
violating the requirements of GI-2.710
and ualit item of P I.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004-
02SAIC-A-2010 Mechanical SAES
3379/29/2007
2:59:38 PM
Welding department of GAMA is
operating W/O an approved "Welding
Engineer" violating the requirements of
Schedule Q Attachment VI Para 2 &Table VI-2. GAMA has not provided any
replacement for the Welding Engineer
who was approved for the project and
left on emergency leave. Welding reject
rate is steadly rising and there is no
effective action from GAMA side to
control it. Root causes of weld failures
need to be analyzed and corrective &
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
3384/4/2007
7:39:22 AM
e o n s rec y on op o g r er co
51) where support should be placed, this
is not allowed. To rectify the problem,
GAMA is to cut out the pipe 600 mm see
RFI 21682 at weld joint FB-74 near col.
52 without approve TQ/SI by Snamengineering. This is a violation of SCH.Q
para 1.3 & 1.4, quote 1.3 " contractor
shall be totally responsible for the quality
of work, quote 1.4 "in conformance with
all drawings". But it seems that GAMA is
carrying the rectification by themselves,
because the drawing used doesnt have
red line from Snam engineering attested
by PMT & PID through TQ/SI. Noting that
the rest of pipe will move after cutting,
so clearance must be secured first from
Snam engineering. Also, Snam welding
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
6/36
3396/19/2007
6:26:48 AM
42" SS spool was installed on line # RL-
2639 without providing the bottom drain
line 2"-B72-BD-1359-ISD0P shown on the
drawing referenced above. Since the
materials of the drain attachment are
ASTM A312 TP 316L, welding works will
require back purging. Contractor shall
provide its technical expalanation (a
method statement) how the required
back purging can be achieved on the
installed piping. Also, contractor shall
submit RFI for verification of Pikotek
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
NA NA Mechanical Schedule
3405/2/2007
1:28:34 PM
Face of flanges damage (accross the
flange face) violation as per SAEP 351
para. 4.3 and SAES-L-109 para. 8.2. Also,
micro serration groove of four raise face
flanges have been removed by hand
power buffing tool, line HWS-2178
column 39 round level west side
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
3414/12/2006
9:25:39 AM
pes opera ng a ove , n opera on
90% of the time and covered by
Insulation are being coated with Coating
System APCS-17A CSD response for
above: Coating is not required for
insulated piping operating above 70 C
for the main reason of cathodic reversal.
At more than 80 C, zinc becomes the
cathode, and the carbon steel corrodes in
preference to zinc in the presence of
moisture, causing pits in the steel. The
moisture present could be introduced
during construction or by rain or
condensation during downtime. Hence
we recommend that application of APCS-
17A / Inorganic Zinc Primer shall be
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-H-100
01SAIC-H-2023 Mechanical SAES
3424/7/2007
11:00:04 AM
Flange should not be painted, however
during Inspection of pipe spools for
release to site , it was noted that spool A
of B64 P1072 SB1 and spool AB of B64
P1002 SB 119 were painted. Should we
continue this ractice flan e face ma
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
3433/28/2007
11:39:53 AM
It was noted that storage for
prefabricated pipework was inconsistently
complying to the requirements of SAES L-
350 regarding the provision of end
protectors on pipes, weld bevels,socket
ends, and flanges. Any flanges that may
be dama ed durin handlin and
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
3444/24/2007
6:40:00 AM
During my witness of RFI for spool
release at the laydown area , the
following flanges with paint has catched
my attention. Extra precautions is
advised during paint removal , otherwise
any damages on flange face in the form
of deep scratches shall be rejected
durin installation works. SP Paint
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
3455/9/2007
11:11:24 AM
Witnessed during loading to truck of 36 "
dia stainless steel prefabricated pipework
that pipe ends has struck the f lange face
of the 36" dia RF flange which at that
time has no end protection. The flange
face was damage and was part of spool
BW BV of line 36" dia RLC-2769 under
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
7/36
346
5/21/2007
5:57:39 PM
Visual inspection of 33 Nos. dummy pipe
support shows that the weld joint has no
root penetration. Since these supports
was prefabricated in Gama Fab shop in
Jubail , it was highlighted that there was
no visual inspection conducted on these
supports by Gama Welding Inspector. As
these supports arrived in HNRP-GTC , SPWelding inspector has accepted the
delivery with no comments not until
SAPID has brought into the attention of
Mr. Bijo (SP) to reject the support in
question. SP Welding inspector did not
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01 SAIC-W-2007 Mechanical SAES
347 4/16/200710:56:01 AM
e o owng s an ess s ee we ers
except G-021/G-023 who has only 26
mm thick qualifications have welded 33
mm thick P8 materials as follows: B65B
P1052 FB33/SB34 G-084/G027 B65B
P1052 FB24/SB25 G-084/G027 B65B
P1052 SB11 G-084/G027 B65A P1022
SB34/FB33 G-017/G021 B65A P1022
SB20/SB8 G-084/G027 B65A P1022
SB34/FB33 G-017/G021 B65A P1022 SB6
G-084/G027/G019 B65A P1022 FB25 G-
017/G021/G023 To clear this violations,
proposed solutions are as follows 1) Take
100 per cent RT on all joints involved. 2)
Grind 10 mm of weld metal and reweld
using other stainless welder. Welding
Violation-After TheFact
SATIP-W-011-01
SAIC-W-2005 Mechanical SAEP
3485/24/2007
1:37:10 PM
ocumen rev ew on e ers
performance for week ending 20 May
2007 have shown that the following
welders has continued production
welding without RT acceptance of their
first 3 joints. These welders were G-095,G-106,G-132,G-144,G-150,G-154,G-
180,G-193,G-196,G-207,G-223,G-230,
and G-239 and they have violated the
requirements of SAEP 323 par. 6.2.2
regarding acceptance of radiograph for
the first 3 joints before they will be
permitted to continue production
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical SAEP
3495/26/2007
9:53:19 AM
as mon ore e r arr va an
they arrived at 7:30 am , but
unfortunately on Mr. Suresh has come
out to his workplace and the the other
inspectors stay in the QC office.
Unfortunately SP Welding inspector is
also not present on fab shop and arrivedonly at 8:00 am. SAPID has made final
visual inspection at random and found
that 3 joints of 6" dia pipe were welded
using GTAW process and WPS GAMA 111-
002 applies only to 4" dia and below.
Moreover, 1 joint of weldolet has no root
penetration which violates SAES W-011
par.17.6.3.2. These were all attributed to
lack of welding inspectors wherein
welding works is ongoing. GAMA Welding
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2007 Mechanical SAES
350
was o serve an no e a w en
SAPID arrived in GAMA Fabrication shop
at 6:30 am there was no GAMA welding
inspector on shop No. 1 , 2 and outside
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
8/36
3514/3/2007
10:57:33 AM
Document review for welders rejection
rate on a weekly basis have shown that
welders G-073 and G-082 has
accumulated rejection rate calculated on
a linear basis of 5.2 per cent (week
ending 25 March 07) and 13.3 per
cent(week ending 18 March 07). As
todate , welders were continously
welding despite violation as stated on
-
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2016 Mechanical SAES
3524/4/2007
7:24:49 AM
Observed and noted that the use of
oxygen analyzer was not enforced to
ensure that the back purge for stainless
steel has reduced the oxygen level below
0.5 per cent as stated in SAES W-011
par. 11.4.5 An increase in oxygen level in
back ur e ma romote root oxidation
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2006 Mechanical SAES
3534/7/2007
10:51:52 AM
Physical verification of calibration of
Welding machines in use in Fabrication
shop shows that Calibrations of Welding
Machines with tag No. LF 310119C and
LC 034583 were both expired on 25March 2007 and were calibrated on 29
March 2007 and 01 April 2007
respectively. Such practice is in violation
with the requirements of Schedule Q
Attachment IV. Moreover, SP Welding
Ins ector is not aware on the ex iration
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-011-01
SAIC-W-2011 Mechanical SAES
35410/3/2006
3:26:10 PM
It was observed at the inspection of
materials that contractor has modified
(36 Nos) raised face flanges by
machining the raised face to provide flat
face flanges for the riser spools of fire
water piping. How ever machining has
created a smooth finish on the flange
faces. Contractor is informed before
installation and welding of the referencedflanges that serrations need to be
provided on the flat face per the
re uirements of ASME B 16.5 Para
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2006 Mechanical SAES
3553/31/2007
6:03:33 PM
The length and type of stud bolts
installed are incorrect. It is a violation as
per SAES-L-109 para. 12.1 and SAIC-L-
2014 section F. Stud bolts and nuts not in
accordance with SAES-L-109 must be
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
3564/19/2008
3:36:29 PM
Each Furnace Side Wall Panel has plenty
of Anchors by welding. After gritblasting,
immediately protection coat was applied
without conducting Hammer test for the
Anchors, so all Anchors should be
Hammer tested and check for any
welding stregnth/Anchors and damages
on the Anchors, because two Panels were
checked and at least three Anchors are
either became shorter or completely
removed for the weldin attachment.
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical Schedule
3572/3/2008
11:06:18 AM
The fabricated shoes were installed for
piping in GT #3 & Inlet Area without
copletion of the fillet weld on the side
plates with the Saddle from inside. The
fillet weld should be completed from
inside.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2007 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
9/36
35811/9/2008
12:29:52 PM
1 1/2 drains are provided in eccentric
reducers ( 12x 8) for the following line
12-H48-DGA-6034-84-6SAOP which has
been covered by the test package GT6-
DGA-001 . It is in violation with the
requirments of para 12.3 of SAES-L-110.
It is a re eated violation . SINOPEC TRG
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2013 Mechanical SAES
3599/24/2008
7:25:26 AM
It has been found the following in GT 5
of Area A . Welding a weldolet on a 4
piping spool( 4-H48-P-5103-33-C) which
had kept blinded on all openings and
filled completely with water. The root
pass of the weldolet has been completed
when the water level up to the groove of
the weld joint. It is a clear violation as
per para 11.2.1. of SAES W-011. All the
weld joints made on the piping spool
need to be Inspected by 100 % relevant
NDT to ensure that the weld joints , HAZ
zones are free from defects. Contractor
need to investigate further and takenecessary actions to avoid reoccurrence.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2006 Mechanical SAES
3606/11/2009
5:34:06 PM
Leakage is observed from the weep hole
of a 8"x1" lateral connection in the line
12"-H49-RL-5559-02-1CT2P covered by
the test package H49-DD5-RL-002. This
is located at EL+ 114179 , E 11451753 &
N 7497000. Leakage was occured during
pressurisation at about 400 psi while the
line required to be tested at 450 psi. TRG
is requested to investigate for the root
cause of the leakage and provide
necessary corrective action at the
earliest.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-A-004-
02SAIC-A-2015 Mechanical SAES
36111/24/2007
12:31:34 PM
During routine surveillance of quality
control records, found that TRG/Sinopec
are not utilizing quality control
attachments A, B, C & D. This is repeated
violation; refer to LBE-4483 of SAES-H-
100 Para 9.2.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-H-100
01SAIC-H-2026 Mechanical SAES
3623/30/2009
11:28:45 AM
During re-instatement the following has
been observed. Test pack # H46-IA-P-
10.3 (ISO H46-P-7022-31-3CT2P Item #
10 at M1) 6 spiral wound gasket AISI
316L/graphite installed 300 class in place
of 600class. This is violation against SAEP
351 4.1 and ISO drawing. Contractor is
advice to take corrective actionimmediately.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAEP
3632/26/2008
8:00:31 AM
The length of the segmental wear Padis
300mm while the width of the I-Beams is
300mm. About 15 saddles were already
welded to the 20" pipe, 12 Beams are
with 300mm width and 3 Beams are with
280mm. There is zero tolerance for
expansion and this is violating Standard
Drwing (AD-036555)that the length of
the segmental wear Pad is 355mm
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2018 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
10/36
3645/11/2008
5:38:17 PM
SAPID has witnessed Material Inspection
for Tie In H46-025 and H46-027 which
includes prefabricated slip blinds ,
gasket, bolts and nuts. During inspection,
it was identified that the bolts is A193 Gr.
B7M with nuts A194 Gr L7 againsts the
required A193 Gr B7 bolts and A194 Gr.
2H nuts. Material substitution may be
permitted if the same or higher grade.
A193 Gr B7M can be accepted but A194
Gr L7 is rejected to replace the required
nuts (A194 Gr. 2H)
Violation-
PreventedInstallation
SATIP-L-350-
01 SAIC-L-2008 Mechanical SAES
3655/14/2008
5:15:44 PM
Delivered prefabricated pipe spools at
Area B plant H46 were found lying on the
ground wherein ends of pipes, flanges,
weld bevels, threads, sockets were not
protected for possible damage and
accumulation of foreign materials inside .
This negligence on the part of theContractor violates the requirements of
SAES L-350 par 7.4 .Moreover, prior to
piping erection , all pipe spools shall be
internally cleaned by air blowing .
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
3665/25/2008
3:41:39 PM
A segmental wear Pad is missing for
Location #6 counting from east on the
Line (20"-H46-P-0112-63-6CT2P1)
feedin D-049
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2018 Mechanical SAES
3675/25/2008
3:41:39 PM
A segmental wear Pad is missing for
Location #6 counting from east on the
Line (20"-H46-P-0112-63-6CT2P1)
feedin D-049
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2018 Mechanical SAES
3688/12/2008
7:05:15 AM
On top of Air cooler H46-E-59 it isnoticed that, PZVs & gate valve are laying
horizontally mixed with debris/scarp
material, left uncovered since two days,
storage & handling of PZVs are not done
as per the requirements .This is violation
of SAES-L-350 Para 7 & 8 and 04-SAMSS-
035 Para12 also refer to lessen learn
sapd-096 Date: 6/18/2008. PZVs Photos
captured on site can be avail from PID if
required. Contractor corrective and
preventive action is requested. (21-PZV-
829A/B & Gate Valve)
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-108-
01SAIC-L-2041 Mechanical SAES
3698/16/2008
5:47:52 PM
During surveillance of welding activitiesof socket joints in Area B-H46 (D006C),
found that no QC from TRG / Sinopec is
verifying axial gap 1.5 mm minimum ~ 3
mm maximum between male & female
components prior to welding. Found gap
either small or more than 6 mm. This is
repeated violation of SAES-L-110 Para
5.2.3 & SAIC-W-2037 Item B3. Corrective
Action: 1.Use SA check list.
2.TRG/Sinopec QC should make fit up
inspection and verify the axial gap prior
to welding. 3.Take 5 % RT to verify the
gap. 4.All socket joints not meeting the
requirements are cut and rewarded.5.RFI to be raised to verifying the gap
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2037 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
11/36
3708/19/2008
4:45:53 PM
It is notice in Area - B that, many new
pikotek Spiral wound gaskets 24 &
above was place in horizontal, sloping
position in unsafe condition, & some are
hanging on the scaffold/hand rails at
workplace. Such method of
storage/handling has the potential todamage the gaskets while violating the
requirements SAEP-351 Para 4.1 Ensure
that spiral wound gaskets are stored flat
especially for large sizes, 24 inches and
larger. SAES-L-350 Para 8.1 all material
shall be handle with care during
fabrication and installation to prevent
damage. Contractors corrective &
preventive action is requested. Pictures
demonstrating the violation can be avail
from SAPID if necessary.
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2007 Mechanical SAES
3718/23/2008
5:38:13 PM
For piping associated to H46-E-059
Stainless steel line # P-8056-31/32, P-
8057-31/32 & P-8033-31/32 Jointassembly of flange joint are done without
proper alignment of joints and bolting is
done by apply force while full Strain is on
bolts and equipment nozzle & piping
installation is first started from
equipment nozzles. This practice is
violation ASME B31.3 Para 335.1 (a)
joint assembly which introduces a
detrimental strain in equipment or piping
component is prohibited & (c) before
bolting up flange faces shall be aligned to
the design plane.Contractor QC vigilant
and corrective action is requested prior
hydrostatic test of line.
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
3728/27/2008
10:43:22 AM
It is noticed that, minimum distance
between 16 inch piping flange and
vertical structure is not maintained for
stainless steel line # H46-P-8056-32
spool-I, the flange touches with
structural column. This is violation to
SAES-L-310 Para 12.4 A minimum
clearance of 50 mm shall be provided for
inspection and freedom of pipe
movement between above ground piping
crossing with any structure (including
pipe support structure). Contactor
corrective action is requested prior to
Hydrotest of piping.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
12/36
3739/2/2008
1:11:48 PM
Noticed that, for distortion of piping & to
bring it in alignment Contractor has
heated the pipe/fitting & force by
hammering and masked by buffing the
heated/effected area on Package H46-P-
028 (2 inch line # H46-P-7006-82 weld #
36,35 & 34), such practice has potentialof thermal cracking and effect on
material properties . This is the violation
of SAIC-W-2036 item # A7 Welds
requiring re-work by heating shall require
approval by CSD and SAES-W-011 Para
18.5 and Schedule Q Para 7
.3.5.Contactor corrective and preventive
action is requested for such repeated
violations.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
3749/28/2008
10:45:45 AM
Noticed that, spool I of 42-H46-RL-7001-
01 is used to support other 24 inch pipe
(line # 24-H46-RL-7001-33). This is
violation to SAES-L-350 Para 11.2 unless
consult & approved by chairman of pipingstandards committee. Contractor action
is requested prior to perform welding
activity.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES
37510/12/2008
5:12:34 PM
Noticed that, line # 24-H46-P-0110-
81(Package H46-P-005) was tested with
24inch valve item # 18 as test removed
(RT) now it is observed that 24 inch valve
is placed with unacceptable offset with
the pipe flanges and . This is the violation
of SAES-L-350 Para 8.1. Contractor is
requested to verify gasket seating area
for any damage utilizing SAIC-L-2014 and
avoid bolting the flanges by force without
proper alignment for all the valves to
installed in this package and any
modification / cut and re- welding need
Aramco approval.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
376
one end of the valve stick without any
gasket in-between which means there
have been valve & pipe flange strike
durin installation
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
37710/16/2008
3:42:49 PM
36 Venturi 21-FE-102 Inlet area:
unacceptable imperfection (deep
scratches) on flange face is noticed, this
is the violation of SAEP-351 Para 4.3
The flange facing, particularly the
seating area, shall be visually examined
for cleanliness and ensure that no
damage, such as scratches exist and
also observe some of orifice flanges &
valves are store directly on concrete,
violation of SAES-L-350 Para 8.1 all
material shall be handle with care during
fabrication and installation to prevent
damage. Imperfection shall be repaired
with Aramco approved procedure
Contractors Corrective action and
verification through SAPID is requested
prior installation of venturi.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
13/36
3781/16/2008
9:41:15 AM
In the Fabshop, more than 200joints
have been branch welded and so far
contractor didnt perform DPT on SS and
MPI on CS branch joints which is a
violation of SAES-W-011. Contractor is
recommended to perform NDT ( as per
the line class(10% or 100%) calls for) tothe above said branch connections with
intimation to Aramco Inspection.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2007 Mechanical SAES
3798/12/2008
7:01:33 AM
In inlet area facility it is noticed that,
shop welded joint Line number: H46-P-
8047-32 6CT2P 16 inch dia are cut and
re-welding/modification of joint in field
was in process without pre-welding &
joint fit-up inspection as required by
SATIP-W-011-01 item 3.6 & 3.7 and not
utilizing of SAIC-W-2036 and SAES-W-
011 Para 18.4 by Contractor is the
violation of Schedule Q attachment VI
Para 4A. Contractor corrective and
preventive action is requested.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
380
3/29/2009
1:12:58 PM
During routine inspection visit, the
following has been observed. Electrodes
oven for drying and holding in area B
(Near SWS) is not properly controlled
and maintained as per the requirement.
There is no record of low hydrogen 5.1,
5.5 and stainless steel electrode drying
for two hours at 260-430, 370-430 and
120-250 degree Celsius respectively. All
electrodes E 8013, E 316 and E 309 are
kept in same oven and some electrodes E
309 and E 316L electrodes are kept both
together in same place. Too manycellulose electrodes E 6010 also kept
inside with E 7018 in oven which are not
require any storage and conditioning.
There is no record of electrodes returned
on an end of shift and re-conditioning of
these electrodes. Periodic checks of the
temperature achieved with each portable
oven are not carried out. These are all
violation against SAES-W-011 (6.1).
Contractor is advice to take corrective
action immediately.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01 SAIC-W-2032 Mechanical SAES
38111/20/2007
8:30:55 AM
During surveillance of Storage &exposure of filler wires- ER 70S-2,found
that filler wires are being stored in work
areas in open containers & in open
environment. These wires are getting
rust/ contamination, and which is one of
the root causes of root porosity and high
WWR. As per SAES-W-011, Attachment
2, which states all electrodes & wires,
shall be stored in sealed containers in dry
environment. Any wires that have visible
rusting or contamination shall not be
used and shall be discarded.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2032 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
14/36
3828/19/2008
4:37:24 PM
Field Welding by SMAW process was
ongoing by unqualified welder T- 115 JCC
# 228, weld joint # 71 line number 24-
H46-P-0110-83. NPS of joint is 24
thickness 24.6mm were as welder is
qualified to weld for maximum thickness
11.5mm in SMAW and the weaving widthof the hot-pass by this welder was notice
15mm that violates WPS. Also no
identification marking for welder, fit up
check & WPS is notice adjacent to weld
joint. These are the violation to SAES-W-
011 Para 8.1 and Para 16.1 and violation
to SATIP-W-011-01. Contractors
corrective on action/examination and
preventive action is requested.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2006 Mechanical SAES
3833/9/2009
11:39:42 AM
During surveillance inspection visit in
Inlet area (Area B), Drawing no. 36-H46-
P-7000-6CT2P joint no. 36 cut being re-
welded by welder no.T-074 & T-034. The
following observed has been found 1) No
information was made to cut the joint 2)
Joint not having any traceably joint no,
line no, wps no. 3) Joint was not
inspected and 10mm high low measured
4) Preheating was not done as confirm
by welder 5) Welder was not having
welder ID 6) Welder was using cold
electrode 7) Electrode was used E-8013
C3 instead of E-7018 as per WPS- CS-
04A 8) This is absolutely violation
against SAES-W011, SAIC-W-2005 &
2006 and WPS. Contractor is advice to
take correction action immediately.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2006 Mechanical SAES
384No welding coverage from TRG and
Sinopec welding inspector
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
3853/11/2009
1:02:18 PM
During walk through of test pack # H46-
IA-P-020, the weldolet joint # 9A found
lack of fusion at root (Drg.BB-250248-
023). This is violation against SAIC-W-
2007. Contractor is advice to repair
immediately and also require more
vi ilant for Visual ins ection.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2007 Mechanical SAES
38611/5/2008
4:25:58 PM
Noticed that, PWHT is not performed onwelds that required PWHT but Contractor
submitted false/corrupt record. Not
performing PWHT is violating SATIP-W-
011-01 item 3.14 requirement & such
practice is violation of Schedule Q
attachment VI Para 4A & IV Para 7.2.
Contractor corrective and preventive
action is requested with root cause
analysis. Weld numbers for such
concerns are 36-H46-P-7000-82 Field
welds # 96,100,102.24-H46-P-7046-31
Field welds # 1.24-H46-P-7047-31 Field
welds # 1.24-H46-P-7031-31 Field
welds # 1.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2004 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
15/36
38710/12/2008
4:42:15 PM
Noticed that, 30- H46-P-7001-31 joint #
02 & 03 (30 inch heavy thickness pipe
26.97mm) were field welded and PWHT
activity is started without joint fitup, pre-
heat control, in-process welding, weld
visual inspection and no welder identifiedon joint. Joint number 02 shown as shop
weld in ISO drawing is welded in field
and other joints indicated as shop weld in
ISO are to be welded in field. Not
performing inspection by Contractor QC
is the Violation of not implementing
SATIP-W-011-01 item 3.6, 3.7& 3.9.
Contractor is requested to perform NDE
(RT) for above two welded joint
irrespective of line class NDE
requirement. Contractor is also requested
to perform welding inspection as per
SATIP in SWS & Thermal oxidizer areas.
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2005 Mechanical SAES
3882/26/2008
10:12:51 AM
In area B, Contractor hasnt started
radiography, which now became a RT
backlog of more than 100joints, which is
a violation of SAEP-324, Para: 6.2.7 and
SAIC-W-2015. This condition shall affect
the trend analysis of weld rejection rate
and the early detection of non-
conforming welders and weld joints. So
the contractor is recommended to start
radiography as early as possible to
reduce the backlog and pull out bad
welders.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2015 Mechanical SAEP
3898/17/2008
2:02:29 PM
For Leakage noticed from HAZ of welded
joint # 2003 line BB250248-093 (HTPackage H46-IA-P-035) during HT
preparation, The weld joint is begin cut-
out in spite of proactive/request by
SAPID to investigate the root cause,
verify PMI, welding & NDE records/film
(as the weld joint was RT accepted) and
Aramco approval prior to proceed for
repair activity as per SA procedures/
Schedule Q Para 7.3.4 & 5 and utilizing
SATIP-W-011-01/SAIC-W-
2036.Contractors prompt corrective and
preventive action is requested .
Violation-After The
FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
3908/19/2008
4:54:05 PM
Many weld joints in field are cut and re-weld/modification of joint in field are
performed without pre-welding & joint fit-
up inspection as required by SATIP-W-
011-01 item 3.6 & 3.7 and not utilizing of
SAIC-W-2036 and SAES-W-011 Para 18.4
by Contractor is the violation of Schedule
Q attachment VI Para 4A. (Example: H46-
SOW-7001-31 shop weld # 01, weld
joints of line H46-P-8031-33, H46-P-8045
32 & H46-SOW-7000-33 joint connecting
7001-31 line) Contractor corrective and
preventive action is requested for such
repeated violation.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
16/36
3918/25/2008
5:50:30 PM
Noticed that,for distortion of piping and
in some case to bring joint assembly into
alignment Contractor is heating the
pipe/fitting and quenching by using flame
cutting torch and applying water on it to
cool, such practice has potential of
thermal cracking and effect on materialproperties. (Example of this practice line
# H46-SOW-7000-31, SOW-7003/4-33 in
Inlet area) this is the violation to SAES-W-
011 Para 18.5 and Schedule Q Para 7
.3.5. And such violation activity was
highlighted to TRG QC.Contactor
corrective and preventive action is
requested prior to Hydrotest of such
piping system.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
3928/25/2008
5:50:38 PM
Noticed that,for distortion of piping and
in some case to bring joint assembly into
alignment Contractor is heating the
pipe/fitting and quenching by using flame
cutting torch and applying water on it tocool, such practice has potential of
thermal cracking and effect on material
properties. (Example of this practice line
# H46-SOW-7000-31, SOW-7003/4-33 in
Inlet area) this is the violation to SAES-W-
011 Para 18.5 and Schedule Q Para 7
.3.5. And such violation activity was
highlighted to TRG QC.Contactor
corrective and preventive action is
requested prior to Hydrotest of such
piping system.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
3938/27/2008
10:38:42 AM
On stainless steel line # H46-P-8056-32
welds 39, 40, & 41 noticed that, for
distortion of piping and/or to bring joint
assembly into alignment Contractor has
heated the weld joints by using flame
cutting torch and applying water on it to
cool, such practice has potential of
thermal cracking and effect on material
properties. This is the violation of SAIC-W
2036 item # A7 Welds requiring re-work
by heating shall require approval by CSD
and SAES-W-011 Para 18.5 and Schedule
Q Para 7 .3.5.Contactor corrective and
preventive action is requested for such
repeated violations .( refer related
Surveillance Number: 12611, 13074 &
12867).
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
3949/13/2008
1:23:52 PM
Noticed that on line # H46-SOW-7002-31
Orifice flange, Contractor heated the pipe
nipple/fitting by using flame cutting torch
and twisting to position it, such practice
has potential of thermal cracking and
effect on material properties. This is the
repeated violation to Schedule Q Para 7
.3.5 and refer to SAES-W-011 Para
18.5.Contactor corrective & preventive
action and TRG assessment to fine the
widespread of such problem is
requested.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
17/36
39510/16/2008
4:15:24 PM
Notice that, many weld joints marked as
shop weld in IFC isometric are been
welded on site example of PID
observation are stainless steel 316L 4
line H46-VT-D049-44-6SD0Z weld #
123,138,122 & 134.also noticed
contractor is using supersededISO/documents and unavailability of
WPS, SATIP on the work site etc this is
violation of SAEP-1154, Para 5.4.2.3c
Provide correct versions of documents
at point of use and also Schedule-Q,
Para 3.7. Contractor is requested to
perform NDT on all such field welded
joints (marked as shop joints in ISO) as
per line class requirement. TRG QC
vigilance on such amendment welding
practice and providing applicable
document on work site and document
control is requested.
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2005 Mechanical SAES
39610/29/2008
2:26:08 PM
During final review of TRG accepted weldsummary in HT Packages noticed that,
many weld joints cut and re-
weld/modification in field without pre-
welding & joint fit-up inspection and
mention as shop weld in weld summary.
These are the violation of SATIP-W-011-
01 item 3.6 & 3.7 and not utilizing of
SAIC-W-2036 and SAES-W-011 Para 18.4
by Contractor is the violation of Schedule
Q attachment VI Para 4A. (Example is HT
packages H46-S-001, H48-FG-02/03)
Contractor corrective and preventive
action is requested for such repeated
violation.
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
39710/30/2008
3:05:55 PM
Repeated violations are noticed in field
Area B & C for not performing inspection
(welding activities) by Contractor QC
particularly for SATIP-W-011-01 item 3.6,
3.7, 3.9 & 3.17 (joint fitup up to weld
completion and verification of welder).
PID current observation are 24- H46-P-
7001-01 Rev B joint # 39 & start of
repair activity for 42- H46-P-8010-01
42inch Tie in flange (also No approved
repair procedure) and many many welds
cutout & modification in SWS area.
Contractor is requested for prompt
corrective and preventive action on suchrepeated violation.
Violation-
Prevented
InstallationNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
18/36
39811/6/2008
7:08:18 AM
Notice that, second time PWHT/heating
done in field for some shop welded &
heat treated joints probably for
alignment. This is the violation of SAES-
W-011 Para 13.10 & SAIC-W-2036 item
# A7 welding or heating after the final
PWHT is not permitted if the PWHT isrequired for service.. Weld numbers for
such concerns are 24-H46-P-7047-31
welds # 5.36-H46-P-7000-81 welds #
81.18-H46-P-7035-31 welds # 9.36-
H46-P-7000-01 welds # 56. Contractor
corrective and preventive action is
requested with root cause analysis.
Violation-After The
FactSATIP-W-011-01
SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
39911/6/2008
1:20:10 PM
During final review of TRG accepted weld
summary in HT Package H46-P-004
noticed that, many weld joints cut and re-
weld/modification in field without pre-
welding & joint fit-up inspection and
without PWHT, NDE (as applicable).
These are the violation of SATIP-W-011-
01 and not utilizing of SAIC-W-2036 and
SAES-W-011 Para 18.3 & 18.4 by
Contractor is the violation of Schedule Q
attachment VI Para 4A. (Example is 24-
H46-P-7031-31 welds # 4.18-H46-P-
7031-31 welds # 17, 18.16-H46-P-7047-
33 welds # 61 & 73.16-H46-P-7047-32
welds # 35, 46, 45, 27& 38.) Contractor
corrective and preventive action is
requested for such repeated violation.
Violation-
Prevented
Installation
SATIP-W-
011-01SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES
40010/29/2007
4:18:53 PM
Generally, some branches connection
were made either without reducing Tee,weldolet or no reinforcement pad which
are violating Saudi Aramco Standard,
SEAS-L-110 , Paragraph 12.1.1 (Chart
1.). Some spools are listed below: 1).6-
H46-RL-3603-31-1CT2P-C (Two 2
Branches have no Reinfo. Pad) 2).8-H46-
S-3605-83-1CSIS-I (One 6 Branch has
no Reinfo. Pad) 3). 6-H46-W-3604-81-
1CS2P-E (One 6 Branch has no
Reinfo. Pad) 4).24-H48-DGA-5022-01-
1T9P1-MP (One 16 Branch as no
Reinfo. Pad) 5).3-H49-S-5169-02-1CS2S-
C (One 2 Branch has no Reinfo. Pad)
6).12-H49-RL-5559-02-1CT2P-F (One 6 Branch & one 8 Branch have no
Reinfo. Pad)
Violation-After The
Fact
SATIP-L-350-
01SAIC-L-2013 Mechanical SAES
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
19/36
Is it related
to Design
error
Is it
H, W, S
Areas of
Concern
Comments on the
LogbookComments on
Blank/Others
Yes SProcess
Piping
No SProcess
Piping
No SProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No H Hydrotest
No H Hydrotest
No W Welding
No H Hydrotest
No NA
NO QC
Personnal/Q
C tools /
organization
chart
No H Hydrotest
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
20/36
Yes NA
IFC/P&ID/Ve
ndor
/standard
Drawing
error/misma
tch/violation
No WProcess
Piping
No HProcess
Piping
No H Hydrotest Pneumatice Test
No WProcess
Piping
No HProcess
Piping
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
21/36
No H Coating
No W Coating
No H Coating
No SProcess
Piping
No HProcess
Piping
No W Valves
No WProcess
Piping
No W Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
22/36
No W
NO QC
Personnal/Q
C tools /
or anization
No SProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No W Valves
No H Valves
No NA Hydrotest
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
23/36
No NA Hydrotest
No NA
IFC/P&ID/Ve
ndor
/standard
Drawing
error/misma
tch/violation
No SProcess
Piping
No H Hydrotest
No NA Schedule Q
No S Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
24/36
No NA
IFC/P&ID/Ve
ndor
/standard
Drawing
error/misma
tch/violation
No WProcess
Piping
No H Coating
No WProcess
Piping
No SProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No SProcess
Piping
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
25/36
No W Welding
No W Welding
No W Welding
No W Welding
No NA
Personnal/Q
C tools /
organization
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
26/36
No W Welding
No S Welding
No W Welding
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No S Others
No W Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
27/36
No WProcess
Piping
No S Welding
No H Hydrotest
No H Coating
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
28/36
No WProcess
Piping
No SProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No W Valves
No W Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
29/36
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No SProcess
Piping
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
30/36
No H Welding
No SProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
No WProcess
Piping
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
31/36
No W Welding
No H Welding
No W Welding
No W Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
32/36
No S Welding
No S Welding
No S
NO QC
Personnal/Q
C tools /
organization
chart
No W Welding
No W Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
33/36
No W Welding
No W Welding
No NA Schedule Q
No H Welding
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
34/36
No H WeldingSchedule Q para number not
matching.
No H WeldingSchedule Q para number not
matching.
No H WeldingSchedule Q para number not
matching.
No H WeldingSchedule Q para number not
matching.
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
35/36
No W Welding
No H Welding
No NA
NO QC
Personnal/Q
C tools /
organization
chart
8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400
36/36
No H Welding Schedule Q para number notmatching.
No H Welding
No WProcess
Piping