Top Banner
QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005
13

QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Eugene Bradford
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

QEvC issues

Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005

Page 2: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Feedback mechanism

Data generat

or

Data use

1. Data control and validation versus reference

2. Evaluation versus requirements

3. Improvements versus technology

1. automatically? part of control, automatic pre-validation & control

2. Manually by the operator *3. R&D project

Page 3: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

choice

1 data & warning, rather automatically, the easy way

e.g. on-line via desktop

2 data & application, manually, help yourselfe.g. by XLS macro

Page 4: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Presentaion of errors & bias

1. Gross errors & bias like in GDPS2. Distribution & standard deviation

O-B temperature difference distributionQEvC 2003Q02

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

O-B temperature difference (°C)

perc

en

tag

e

950 500pressure /hPa

5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00

102010101000990980970960950940930920910900850800750700650600550500450400350300250200150

0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 +5 +4 +3 +2 +1

O-B temperature difference (°C)

pre

ssu

re (

hP

a)

O-B temperature difference distributionQEvC 2003Q02

Δp=10hPa

Δp=50hPa

Page 5: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

By aircraft

Aircraft type

MedianLVR/LVW/°C

MedianASC/DES/°C

Medianall data

/°C

width(50%)

/°C

A-300, A-310 0.15 0.24 0.23 0.41

A-318, A-319, A-320, A-321 0.46 -0.04 0.06 0.90

A-320 -0.22 -0.17 -0.18 0.29

A-318, A-319, A-321 0.76 0.64 0.71 0.40

A-330, A-340 0.18 0.09 0.14 0.30

B-737 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.36

B-747 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.30

B-757, B-767 -0.05 0.08 0.05 0.48

O-B temperature difference distributionQEvC 2004Q01

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

A-300,A-310

A-320 A-318,A-319,A-321

A-330,A-340

B-737 B-747 B-757,B-767

aircraft type

tem

pera

ture

diff

ere

nce

(K

)

Page 6: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Amsterdam International Airport Schiphol

-300

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2003-10-01

2003-10-03

2003-10-05

2003-10-07

2003-10-09

2003-10-11

2003-10-13

2003-10-15

date & time

pre

ssu

re a

ltit

ud

e (

m)

ASC FM42 DES FM42 pressure altitude at RWY

QE

vC

©K

NM

I 20

04

Pressure altitude control

Amsterdam International Airport Schiphol

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

2003-09-06

2003-09-08

2003-09-10

2003-09-12

2003-09-14

2003-09-16

2003-09-18

2003-09-20

2003-09-22

2003-09-24

2003-09-26

2003-09-28

2003-09-30

date & time

pre

ssu

re a

ltit

ud

e (

m)

ASC FM42 DES FM42 pressure altitude at RWY

QEv

C ©

KN

MI 2

004

Pressure altitude control

Page 7: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Position (lat, lon)

51.5

52.0

52.5

53.0

3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

ASC FM42

DES FM42

ASC BUFR

DES BUFR

EHAM

period:2003-10-18 00:002003-10-19 00:00

QE

vC

©K

NM

I 2

00

4

Amsterdam International Airport Schiphol

-

Amount

N[ DES FM42] = 0 N[ ASC FM42] = 0

N[ ASC BUFR] = 71

N[ DES BUFR] = 20

Take off positionEU2897 4.72°E 52.45°N

EHAM4.75°E 52.33°N

Page 8: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

BUFR issues

BUFR record length: 326

Edition number (should be 3!) : 2

Section 1 (length 18):Master table number : 0Originating/generating sub-centre: 0Originating/generating centre : 74Update sequence number : 0Optional section indicator : 0 ==> Optional section present : NoData category : 4Data sub-category : 255Version number of master tables : 2Version number of local tables : 1Year of century : 5Month : 6Day : 15Hour : 13Minute : 7Byte 18 : 0

<master_tables version="001" date="1991-10-31"> <table_B file="master_table_b_001.xml" /> <table_D file="master_table_d_001.xml" /> </master_tables>

<master_tables version="002" date="1993-06-30"> <table_B file="master_table_b_002.xml" /> <table_D file="master_table_d_002.xml" /> </master_tables>

-------

<master_tables version="007" date="2020-12-01"> <table_B file="master_table_b_007.xml" /> <table_D file="master_table_d_007.xml" /> </master_tables>

Subset 1 (with 35 elements):

311001 Sequence: SINGLE LEVEL REPORT: ASDAR/AIR -1000000000301051 Sequence: AIRCRAFT STATION DATA -1000000000001006 AIRCRAFT FLIGHT NUMBER CCITT_IA5 LH3101 002061 AIRCRAFT NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM CODE_TABLE 0301011 Sequence: DATE -1000000000004001 YEAR YEAR 2005004002 MONTH MONTH 6004003 DAY DAY 15End Seq End Sequence -1000000000301012 Sequence: HOUR/MINUTE -1000000000004004 HOUR HOUR 13004005 MINUTE MINUTE 7End Seq End Sequence -1000000000301021 Sequence: LATITUDE/LONGITUDE -1000000000005001 LATITUDE (HIGH ACCURACY) 10**-5 DEGREE 5585500006001 LONGITUDE (HIGH ACCURACY) 10**-5 DEGREE 1658667End Seq End Sequence -1000000000008004 PHASE OF AIRCRAFT FLIGHT CODE_TABLE 3End Seq End Sequence -1000000000007002 HEIGHT OR ALTITUDE (VERT.LOCATION) 10** 1 M 1159012001 TEMPERATURE/DRY BULB TEMPERATURE 10**-1 K 2167011001 WIND DIRECTION DEGREE_TRUE 228011002 WIND SPEED 10**-1 M/S 108011031 DEGREE OF TURBULENCE CODE_TABLE -1000000000011032 HEIGHT OF BASE OF TURBULENCE 10** 1 M -1000000000011033 HEIGHT OF TOP OF TURBULENCE 10** 1 M -1000000000020041 AIRFRAME ICING CODE_TABLE -1000000000End Seq End Sequence -1000000000007007 HEIGHT M -1000000000011036 MAXIMUM DERIVED EQUIVALENT VERTICAL GUST 10**-1 M/S -1000000000011076 PEAK TURBUL.INTENSITY (EDDY DISS.RATE) 10**-2 M**(2/3)/S -1000000000001008 AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION NUMBER CCITT_IA5 EU1498 002005 PRECISION OF TEMPERATURE OBSERVATION 10**-2 K -1000000000002062 TYPE OF AIRCRAFT DATA RELAY SYSTEM CODE_TABLE 3002064 AIRCRAFT ROLL ANGLE QUALITY CODE_TABLE 0

Page 9: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

FM42 issues (not E-AMDAR) [2005-09-19]

UDAF01 OEJD 190723AMDAR 1906ASC SVHZAPJ 1747N 04510E 0646 F163 MS040 034/012 TB/ S011=ASC SVHZAPJ 1747N 04513E 0646 F175 MS075 041/015 TB/ S011=ASC SVHZAPJ 1748N 04516E 0647 F186 MS100 041/015 TB/ S011=ASC SVHZAPJ 1749N 04520E 0648 F197 MS067 204/006 TB/ S011=/// SVHZAPJ 1755N 04555E 0653 F230 MS117 247/016 TB/ S111=DES SVHZAPJ 1741N 04641E 0700 F135 PS037 041/024 TB/ S011=/// SVHZAPJ 1729N 04703E 0707 F047 PS292 186/014 TB/ S111=DES SVHZAPJ 1730N 04710E 0709 F026 PS360 214/017 TB/ S011=))) SVHZA)) ))))) )))))) )))) F))) ))))) )))/))) TB) ))))=))) SVHZA)) ))))) )))))) )))) F))) ))))) )))/))) TB) ))))333 F))) VG)))=

UDAS01 RJTD 181000 PABAMDAR 1810LVR JP9Z4U57 3508N 13859E 180928 F310 MS330 224/032 TB/ S031333 F310 VG///=LVR JP9Z4WV4 3337N 13600E 180928 F390 MS550 275/014 TB/ S031333 F390 VG///=LVR JP9ZVYYZ 3403N 13044E 180929 F/// PS100 294/018 TB/ S031333 F105 VG///=LVR JP9Z4WVU 3448N 13955E 180925 F170 MS030 289/005 TB/ S031333 F170 VG///=LVR JP9Z4WVU 3454N 14024E 180930 F/// PS070 338/007 TB/ S031333 F107 VG///=LVR JP9ZVY6Z 3441N 13903E 180930 F240 MS140 245/023 TB/ S031333 F240 VG///=

UDAS02 BABJ 181045

AMDAR 1810

LVR B-2221 3655N 11702E 181045 F255 ///// /////// TB/ S//1=

Page 10: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Timeliness: definition of parameter

timeliness (cumulative) FM42+BUFRQEvC2004Q1: 24-26 March 2004

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60delay (minutes)

perc

en

tag

e r

eceiv

ed

record

s

FM42

OVERALL

BUFR

10.5 13.4 19.4

% %

50% time

E-AMDAR 2004Q12004-03-24 – 2004-03-26

timeliness

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95100105110115120

delay in minutes

nu

mb

er

Page 11: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Timeliness: definition of parameter

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84 89 94 99 104

109

114

119

25.00%

50.00%

75.00%

95.00%

98.00%

2004Q3

50.00%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

-1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84 89 94 99 104

109

114

119

50.00%

Page 12: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

Timeliness Δt: synchronisation of UTC

EU-ID N -1 0 1total 2593965 394 4 203

2004Q3 Δt < 0 Δt = 0

Page 13: QEvC issues Jitze van der Meulen, 20 Sept. 2005. Feedback mechanism Data generator Data use 1. Data control and validation versus reference 2. Evaluation.

?