Top Banner

of 32

pzpackets0307

May 31, 2018

Download

Documents

ficanetwork
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    1/32

    PLANNING AND ZONING PACKET MARCH 2007

    AGENDA

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSION

    PUBLIC HEARING

    MONDAY , MAR CH 12, 2007, 7:00 P.M.

    ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT, DIVISI ON I I COURTROOM

    TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

    Call to Order:Establishment of QuorumExplanation of Meeting ProceduresPresentation of Exhibits

    Public Hearings:Tutorial/Trade SchoolVHC StorageCoon Creek Business ParkSteve Harris Project

    Autumn Ridge165 Marina ViewBriarwood Phase 2

    Superior RentsEmory Creek RanchCascadesMonarch GymChateau CoveWilderness Valley LLCNorthwoods Estates

    Old and New Business:Estates on Lea RidgeStage Coach RV Lot Split

    Adjournment.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    2/32

    AGENDA

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSION

    REGULAR MEETING

    MONDAY , MAR CH 19, 2007, 7:00 P.M.ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT, DIVISI ON I I COURTROOM

    TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

    Call to Order:Establishment of QuorumExplanation of Meeting Procedures

    Review and Action:Minutes, February 2007

    Final Votes:Tutorial/Trade SchoolVHC StorageCoon Creek Business ParkSteve Harris Project

    Autumn Ridge165 Marina ViewBriarwood Phase 2Suuperior RentsEmory Creek Ranch

    CascadesMonarch GymChateau CoveWilderness Valley LLCNorthwoods Estates

    Concepts:Spring Ridge EstatesKassel RockPatton SubdivisionThe Jewelry Studio

    Westgate Branson Lakes at Emerald PointePoverty Point Lake LotsBig Cedar Wilderness Club

    Old and New Business:

    Adjournment.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    3/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    TUTORIAL/TRADE SCHOOLMARCH 12, 2007

    #07-05

    Public Hearing for Tutorial/Trade School located at Deer Lane Road in the Swan Township, Sec.35 Twp. 23 Rng. 20.

    The applicant, Aaron Boldman request approval to operate an accredited tutorial trade school.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 10 acres and is located at the end of DeerLane Road on the right where the blacktop ends. The adjoining properties to the request consist

    of residential and agricultural.

    Review: The proposed will be serviced by individual wastewater system and private well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following

    requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code that

    include plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2).b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)

    d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain ManagementOrdinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)

    f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts(Appendix C)

    g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipments or solid waste materials.

    4. Division II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development(Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    4/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    VHC STORAGE BUILDING ADDITION

    MARCH 12, 2007#07-01

    Public Hearing for VHC Storage building addition located off St. Hwy. 76 in the Swan Township,

    Sec. 19 Twp. 22 Rng. 20.

    The applicant Ken Kline requests approval to construct an additional warehouse/logistics facility

    adjacent to the current building.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 21.93 acres and is located off St. Hwy. 76.The adjoining properties to the request consist of commercial, residential, and agriculture.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of an 11,250 sq. ft. building. The property is serviced byan individual sewer system and Public Water Supply District #2.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following

    requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code that

    include plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)

    d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain ManagementOrdinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)

    f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts(Appendix C)

    g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development(Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    5/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORTCOON CREEK BUSI NESS PARK

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-08

    Public Hearing for Coon Creek Business Park located at Coon Creek Road in the Oliver Township,Sec. 10 Twp. 22 Rng. 21.

    The applicant, Ken Barth, requests approval to construct an office warehouse and retail structure.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 12.10 acres and is located off St. Hwy. BB

    and Coon Creek Road. The adjoining properties to the request consist of commercial, residential,agricultural, and municipality.

    Review: The property will be serviced by the City of Hollister sewer and water.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the followingrequirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)

    c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain Management

    Ordinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking the utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development

    (Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B)

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120

    days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    6/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORTSTEVE HARR IS PROJECT

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-10

    Public Hearing for Steve Harris Project located at 344 Blackberry Lane in the Oliver Township,Sec. 18 Twp. 21 Rng. 21.

    The applicant, Steve Harris requests approval to develop a single family residential subdivision.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 25 acres and is located off Blackberry Lane.

    The adjoining properties to the request consist of residential and agricultural.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of 6 lots ranging in size from 2 to 7 acres. The propertywill be serviced by individual septics and a private well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the followingrequirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)

    c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain Management

    Ordinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division I Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development

    (Chapter 3 Sec. Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120

    days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    7/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ONDIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    AUTUMN RI DGE

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #06-88

    Public Hearing for Autumn Ridge located off St. Hwy. 165 in the Oliver Township, Sec. 24 Twp.

    22 Rng. 22.

    The applicant, Tri-Sons Construction and Development to develop a condominium project.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 11.55 acres and is located off St. Hwy. 165.The adjoining properties to the request consist of residential, agricultural and multi-family.

    Review: The proposed request will consist of 30 buildings with 4 units per building with a total of130 units and will be platted as condominiums. The site is to be serviced by Taney County

    Regional Sewer District and water from Aqua Missouri.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following

    requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)

    d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain ManagementOrdinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division I Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development(Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120

    days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    8/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    165 MARINA VIEW

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-09

    Public Hearing for 165 Marina View Restaurant located at 5403 ST. Hwy. 165 in theOliver Township, Sec. 27 Twp. 22 Rng. 22.

    The applicant, Rodney and Carla Wright request approval to operate a restaurant.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 2.76 acres into a restaurant/take outbusiness to be added to a previous approval for a convenience store and boat storagebusiness. The adjoining properties to the request consist of commercial.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of a restaurant to seat up to 27 people. Theproperty is to be serviced by central sewer and a private well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, thefollowing requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development GuidanceCode that includes plans for the following:

    a. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)b. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential

    tracts (Appendix C)c. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities

    (Table 6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in thedevelopment (Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Officewithin 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    9/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORTMARCH 12, 2007

    BRIARW OOD PHASE 2

    #07-04

    Public Hearing for Briarwood Phase 2 located at Lakeshore Dr. in the Branson Township, Sec. 28Twp. 23 Rng. 21.

    The applicant, David Hover requests approval to construct additional units with parking.

    History: Approved for concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 3.39 acres and is located off Lakeshore Dr.

    The adjoining properties to the request consist of commercial, residential, multi family andagricultural.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of 24 unit buildings with parking garages on the bottomfloors. The property is to be serviced by Taney County Regional Sewer District and a community

    well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following

    requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)

    d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain ManagementOrdinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII)

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid materials.

    4. Division I Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development(Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120

    days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    10/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    SUPERIOR RENTS

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-02

    Public Hearing for Superior Rents located at 221 B Adair Rd. in the Branson Township,Sec. 5 Twp. 23 Rng. 21.

    The applicant, Steve Wohnoutka requests approval to operate an equipment rentalbusiness from an existing building.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 4.1 acres and is located on the outerroad parallel to St. Hwy. 65. The adjoining properties to the request consist ofcommercial.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of some interior remodel of the existing mainbuilding for the purpose of renting tools and equipment. Access will be from Adair Road.The property is to be serviced by an individual septic tank and community well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, thefollowing requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development GuidanceCode that include plans for the following:

    a. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking andutilities (Table 6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of solid waste materials.

    4. Division II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in thedevelopment (Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Officewithin 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    11/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    EMORY CREEK RANCH P HASE III

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-07

    Public Hearing for Emory Creek Ranch Phase III located at St. Hwy. 248 in the Branson andJasper Townships, Sec. 25, 30, 31, Twp. 24 Rng. 22, 21.

    The applicant, Emory Creek Ranch, LLC requests approval to develop 216 lots.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 217.76 acres into 216 lots. The adjoiningproperties to the request consist of residential and agricultural.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of 216 residential lots. Access will be from St. Hwy. 248.

    The property is to be serviced by a private treatment plant, and community well or Public WaterSupply District #3.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the followingrequirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)

    c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain Management

    Ordinance 60.3b Sec. A)e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division I Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development

    (Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    12/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    CASCADESMARCH 12, 2007

    #07-11

    Public Hearing for the Cascades located at the intersection of St. Hwy. 176 and 65 in the JasperTownship, Sec. 8, 17 Twp. 24 Rng. 21.

    The applicant, Design Dev. Group, LLC and WGV Assoc., LLC request to develop a patio homeproject with amenities.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 55.4 acres and is located at the southeast

    corner of intersection of St. Hwy. 176 and 65. The adjoining properties to the request consist ofresidential and agricultural.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of two plex and four plex patio homes, welcome center,offices, clubhouse, recreation center, pool, spa, tennis/racquetball courts, and gated access. The

    property will be serviced by a treatment plant and community well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following

    requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)

    d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain ManagementOrdinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division I and II Permits will be required for all applicable structure in the development(Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120

    days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    13/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    MONARCH GYMNASTICS CHEERLEADING AND DANCE

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-12

    Public Hearing for the Monarch Gym located at 111 Warehouse Road in the BransonTownship, Sec. 16 Twp. 23 Rng. 24.

    The applicant, Noell Caylor requests approval to operate a gym for the purpose ofgymnastics, cheerleading, and dance instruction.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains acre and is located off Rinehartand Warehouse Road behind Amerigas. The adjoining properties to the request consistof commercial.

    Review: The proposed site consists of an existing 6000 sq. ft building. Access is fromWarehouse Rd. The property is serviced by an individual wastewater system until theTaney County Regional Sewer District central sewer lines are installed to the area. Wateris provided by Taney County Public Water Supply.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, thefollowing requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development GuidanceCode that include plans for the following:

    a. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)b. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential

    tracts (Appendix C)c. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities

    (Table 6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in thedevelopment (Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Officewithin 120 days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    14/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ON

    DIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    CHATEAU COVEMARCH 12, 2007

    Public Hearing for Chateau Cove located at 2436 Hwy. 265 in the Branson Township, Sec. 10

    Twp. 22 Rng. 22.

    The applicant, C.J. Perme requests approval to develop 8 condominium buildings for multi-family

    use.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007, previously approved as Branson LakesideCondominiums Permit #05-34.

    General Description: The subject property contains 17. 08 acres and is located off the north of St.

    Hwy. 265. The adjoining properties to the development consist of single family residential,commercial, and undeveloped.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of 8 condo buildings consisting of 32 units each for a totalof 256 units along with amenities such as a clubhouse and pool. Access will be from St. Hwy. 265

    (a 24 paved surface) with an existing 22 access, and inner 11 existing road. The property willbe serviced by central water and sewer.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the followingrequirements shall apply unless revised by the Taney County Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)

    c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain Management

    Ordinance 60.3b Sec. A)e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division I and II Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development

    (Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    15/32

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    16/32

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSI ONDIVISION II I STAFF REPORT

    NORTHWOODS ESTATES

    MARCH 12, 2007

    #07-06

    Public Hearing for Northwoods Estates located at Canyon Creek in the Branson Township, Sec. 36

    Twp. 24 Rng. 22.

    The applicant, Jay Grimstead requests approval to add an extra lot to the existing subdivision.

    History: Approved for Concept February 20, 2007.

    General Description: The subject property contains 62 acres and is located off St. Hwy. 248 andCanyon Creek Road. The adjoining properties to the request consist of residential andagricultural.

    Review: The proposed site will consist of an additional lot to Northwoods Estates Subdivision. The

    property is to be serviced by individual septic tanks and a private well.

    Summary: If the Taney County Planning Commission approves this request, the following

    requirements shall apply, unless revised by the Planning Commission:

    1. Compliance with the provisions of the Taney County Development Guidance Code thatinclude plans for the following:

    a. Sediment and erosion control (Appendix B Sec. VI Item 2)b. Stormwater management (Appendix B Item 3)c. Land grading permit (Appendix B)

    d. Delineation of the 100 year floodplain (Taney County Floodplain ManagementOrdinance 60.3b Sec. A)

    e. Utility easements and building line setbacks (Table 12)f. Foliage screening or fencing for commercial area that adjoins residential tracts

    (Appendix C)g. Improvements with scale of buildings, streets, onsite parking and utilities (Table

    6)

    2. Compliance letters from the Fire, Sewer and Water Districts (Chapter VI-VII).

    3. No outside storage of equipment or solid waste materials.

    4. Division I Permits will be required for all applicable structures in the development(Chapter 3 Sec. I Item B).

    5. The Decision of Record shall be filed with the Taney County Recorders Office within 120

    days or the approval shall expire (Chapter II Item 6).

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    17/32

    MINUTES

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSION

    REGULAR MEETINGTUESDAY, FEBRUAR Y 20, 2007, 7:00 P.M.

    ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT, DIVISI ON I I COURTROOM

    TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

    Call to Order:Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. A

    quorum was established with six members present. They were: Sarah Klinefelter,Jim Brawner, Joey Staples, Craig Trotter, Shawn Pingleton, and RandallCummings. Staff present: Eddie Coxie, Kurt Larsen, Bonita Kissee, Marla Pierce,and Bob Paulson.

    Eddie Coxie read a statement explaining the meeting procedures.

    Review and Action:Minutes, December 2006, January 2007: Jim Brawner made a motion to

    approve the December minutes. Joey Staples seconded. The vote to approvewas unanimous. A motion was made by Joey Staples to approve the Januaryminutes. Randall Cummings seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Final Votes:

    Lakestyle Cottages: request by Clinton E. Kasten to develop 3.41 acresinto a private gated community for single-family residences as detachedcondominiums located at 135 Hammock Way. Greg Whitlock from Great RiverEngineering was present with Mr. Kasten to address any questions from thePlanning Commission. Discussion followed regarding the clarification of theproject being whole ownership condominiums, compatibility, long-termownership, and wastewater. A motion was made by Jim Brawner to approvebased upon the decision of record. Joey Staples seconded. The vote to approvewas unanimous.

    Dixon Dock Parking was withdrawn.

    Westgate Branson Lakes at Emerald Pointe: request by Mark Waltrip toconstruct two condominium buildings containing 72 units located off EmeraldPointe Dr. Mrs. Klinefelter presented letters from the Fire District and waterdepartment. Alan Johnson representing the applicant asked that the request bewithdrawn at this time and will present a document to the staff at a later date.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    18/32

    Myer Land Sales Office: request by Myer Land Development Co. to utilize

    an existing structure as an office located at Sante Fe Ave. Mr. Gail Myer waspresent to address questions from the Commission. Discussion followedregarding previous uses, signage, and future plans for the site. Joey Staplesmade a motion to approve based upon the decision of record. Jim Brawner

    seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Manna Office: request by Marci Manna to construct a building forcommercial use located at the Corner of Timberland and St. Hwy 248. MarciManna was present to address questions from the Planning Commission.Discussion followed regarding compatibility to the surrounding area. Jim Brawnermade a motion to approve a special use permit based upon the decision ofrecord. Randall Cumming seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Underhill Heights: request by Jason Brawner to develop a gatedtownhouse community located at Victor Church Road. Jason Brawner waspresent to address questions from the Planning Commission. Discussion followedregarding number of units. Mr. Coxie reported that the project was one unit overthe allowable number of units. Discussion followed with legal counsel regardingcondominium type of development, cluster developments, and common ground.Jim Brawner left the room during discussion and voting because of being relatedto the applicant. Compatibility to the surrounding area was discussed. Mr.Staples and Mr. Pingleton discussed density with Eddie Wolfe who was alsorepresenting Mr. Brawner. A suggestion by Mr. Pingleton to Mr. Brawner, that abuffer could be done surrounding the project between the single-familyresidences and this multi use request. Mr. Wolfe stated that if 14 units could not

    be done it would not be feasible to the applicant. Randall Cummings made amotion to approve based upon the decision of record with the addition of only 14units and double the buffer around the property closest to any single-familydwelling. Joey Staples seconded. The vote to approve was four in favor and onenot in favor. Jim Brawner did not vote. Shawn Pingleton voted no.

    Crabwell Corners: request by Richard E. Deppe to replat Lots 11, 12 andpart of Lot 13 into 4 lots in Crabwell Corners Subdivision at Beaumont Lane.Eddie Wolfe representing the developer addressed questions from the PlanningCommission. Discussion followed with Joey Staples making a motion to approvebased upon the decision of record. Seconded by Shawn Pingleton. Jim Brawner

    abstained. The vote to approve was five in favor and one abstention.

    Mill Creek Phase 2: request by Affiliated Investors, Inc. to develop 19.65acres into a single-family residential subdivision at Mill Creek Road. SteveMatlock representing Affiliated Inv. addressed questions from the PlanningCommission. Shawn Pingleton made a motion to approve based upon the

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    19/32

    decision of record. Randall Cummings seconded. The vote to approve wasunanimous.

    Whispering Meadows: request by Charles Hagston to develop a single-family residential subdivision off Walkington Lane. Mr. Hagston was present to

    address questions from the Planning Commission. Discussion followed regardingtraffic flow from East St. Hwy. 76. Shawn Pingleton noted the traffic situationand made a motion to approve based upon the decision of record. Craig Trotterseconded. The vote to approve was five in favor and one against. Joey Staplesvoted no.

    Pleasant Hollow Estates: request by Thomas A. & Lawanda M. Gibbs todevelop a single-family residential subdivision off Yandell Cove Road. Eddie Wolferepresenting the developer addressed questions from the Planning Commission.Mr. Staples stated that this is a good development because the tracts are big.Randall Cummings made a motion to approve based upon the decision of record.Seconded by Joey Staples. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Tony Knight: request by to operate a bed and breakfast on 6 acres off ST.Hwy. O. Artie Hawkins representing Ms. Knight addressed questions from thePlanning Commission. Jim Brawner noted that this is a special use permit andmade a motion to approve based upon the decision of record. Seconded by JoeyStaples. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Aable Auto Sales/Storage: request by Paul Simon to use an existinglocation to store cars and pickups for sale located off St. Hwy. DD. This project

    was withdrawn.

    Eastland Hills Estates: request by Randy Weber to develop a residentialsubdivision off Links Road. Eddie Wolfe representing the applicant addressedquestions from the applicant. Discussion followed regarding density, stormwaterrunoff, wastewater disposal, and greenspace. Mr. Weber discussed prices of thestructures. Mr. Pingleton asked if there could be another road accessing theproperty. Mr. Wolfe stated that at this time there were no options for anotherroad. After discussion a 50 right of way shall be added to the decision of recordon the west side of the property for an additional road for sometime in thefuture. Mr. Pingleton stated that the Planning Commission should note that the

    church was there first. Craig Trotter made a motion to approve based upon thedecision of record with the addition of; if possible shall hook to Forsyth CitySewer system, and a 50 right of way. Randall Cummings seconded. The vote toapprove was unanimous.

    LTs Honky Tonk: request by Lonnie Scott to operate a restaurant andlounge off Ridgedale Road. Lonnie Scott was present to address questions from

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    20/32

    the Planning Commission. This project was tabled. A motion was made by ShawnPingleton to take this request off the table. Craig Trotter seconded. The vote toplace this project back on the table for vote was unanimous. Mr. Scott reportedthat a sewer system has been engineered to fit the property with the addition ofmore property. Mr. Coxie reported that since the sewer system is requiring

    additional property to be added to the request, is creating a request that iscontrary to the code because it is still less than a 2 acre parcel which the coderequires. This current request would need to appear before the Board of

    Adjustment for approval. Legal counsel reported this request to be a prior non-conforming use. Central sewer is not available at this site, and the applicantcannot place the type of system on less than two acres. Discussion followed. Amotion was made to deny based upon the property being less than two acres toplace a wastewater system on which would violate the Development Code, byJim Brawner. Seconded by Shawn Pingleton. The vote to deny was unanimous.The Planning Commission advised Mr. Scott to apply to the Board of Adjustment.Discussion followed regarding what the applicant can do to receive approval byeither board.

    Concepts:VHC Storage: a request by Ken Kline to construct an additional warehouse

    for Victorian Heart located on 21 acres at 6010 E. Hwy. 76. Ken Kline presenteda site plan and explained location and plans. This storage facility will be used fortextiles for the use of tablecloths, napkins, curtains, etc. Mr. Coxie reported thehistory of the project being that the first Division III was for a small industrialpark. There will be no additional truck traffic according to Mr. Kline. Number ofemployees will not increase. Discussion followed regarding adding more buildings

    in the future. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

    Superior Rents: a request by Steve Wohnoutka to operate an equipmentrental business from an existing structure located at 221 B. Adair Road. Mr.Wohnoutka explained that he prefers to start his business at this location sincethe structure exists and then later possibly to expand if needed to the originalapproval. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

    Wilderness Valley LLC: a request by Terry M. Roeder to construct awarehouse for the use of office space for small businesses on 1.12 acres at 121Warehouse Dr. Mr. Roeder explained the location and plans. He presented a plot

    plan of the project. This project exists and this request is an additional building.Mr. Coxie stated that 12 parking spaces are required by the Code and theremight not be room for them. Discussion followed. This project will proceed topublic hearing next month. This type of request will be discussed at the Marchstudy session.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    21/32

    Briarwood Phase 2: a request by David Hover to construct a 24 unit

    building with parking garage off Lakeshore Dr. Eddie Wolfe explained the requestand stated that the first phase is currently under construction. He stated that thisis in the floodplain and will need to be built to FEMA height restrictions. Hestated that the sewer capacity analysis has been done and there is capacity in

    the sewer plant for the additions. There is a state approved well. Mr. Wolfestated that these buildings would be a mirror image of what exists. This projectwill proceed to public hearing next month.

    Tutorial/Trade School: a request by Aaron Boldman to operate a tradeschool for boys on property located at the end of Deer Lane Road on 10 acres.Mr. Boldman presented a master plan of the request. Jim Strong explained thesite plan location. Mr. Coxie reported the history of the project. Mr. Strong statedthat this is not a residential treatment facility. Range in age of students will bebetween 15 and 20 years of age. An application has been turned in to the sewerdistrict. There will be dormitory type of buildings to fit on the property as per theCode. This project will proceed to public hearing next month.

    Northwoods Estates: a request by Jay Grimstead to add another lot to anexisting subdivision located at St. Hwy. 248 and Canyon Creek. Eddie Wolferepresenting the developer reported that this was previously approved forfourteen lots and the developer would like to add one more lot. Due to the newrequirements of the State Hwy. Dept., an entrance will not be approved at thesite previously requested. Another entrance is proposed and since the plans havebeen redrawn, more land is left to add an extra lot. This project will proceed topublic hearing next month.

    Emory Creek Ranch Phase III: a request by Emory Creek Ranch, LLC todevelop 216 lots on 217.76 acres located off St. Hwy. 248. Eddie Wolferepresenting the developer presented the plans and stated that this is east ofphase two. Mr. Wolfe reported that a conservation trust is being done so theopen spaces will stay open. This project will proceed to public hearing nextmonth.

    Coon Creek Business Park: a request by Industrial Park Plaza, Inc. toconstruct an office warehouse and retail building located off St. Hwy. BB andCoon Creek Road. Eddie Wolfe representing Mr. Barth the developer presented

    site plans of the request. A landgrading permit has been issued. Plans are for 22lots for office/retail warehouse buildings. Wastewater and water will come fromthe City of Hollister. Possible annexation could occur in the future. This projectwill proceed to public hearing next month.

    165 Marina View: a request by; Rodney and Carla Wright to operate arestaurant/take-out with seating capacity of up to 27 people at 5403 St. Hwy.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    22/32

    165. Mr. Wright explained his plans and stated that this is the site of theprevious approval. He presented a picture of the future structure. This projectwill proceed to public hearing next month.

    Steve Harris Project: a request by Steve Harris to develop a 6-lot

    subdivision on 25 acres located at 344 Blackberry Lane. Mr. Harris presented asite plan of the request, and explained the location and lot size. Private septicand wells are planned to service the project. This project will proceed to publichearing next month.

    Cascades: a request by Design Development Group, LLC to develop 55.4acres into patio homes located at the corner of St. Hwy. 65 and 176. KenHeithous representing the project presented new site plans. Mr. Coxie explainedthe location and history of the site. Mr. Heithous stated that this plan differs fromthe first plan in that there is less commercial and will be a gated community.Trees will be preserved as much as possible and most of the vegetation. Hestated that the St. Hwy. Dept. has purchased some of the property to constructan interchange sometime in the future. Total number of units will beapproximately 40 to 50 buildings in the initial plans which would be two to fourliving units per building approximately. This project will proceed to public hearingnext month.

    Monarch Gymnastics Cheerleading and Dance: a request by Noelle Caylorto utilize an existing 6000 sq. ft. building for instructionalcheerleading/gymnastics/dance and a special needs tumbling program located on acre at 111 Warehouse Road. Ms. Caylor explained that plans are to change

    the use of an existing building from a warehouse to a gymnastics facility.Discussion followed regarding wastewater disposal. Sewer district has beencontacted. The Planning Commission asked for a site plan, hours of operationwould be from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Sunday. This project willproceed to public hearing next month.

    Autumn Ridge: a request by Tri-Sons Const. and Development toconstruct 30 buildings with 4 units per building with a total of 130 units. EddieWolfe explained location and plans. He stated that Wilderness RV previouslyowned this land. This property is adjacent to the rock quarry. This project willproceed to public hearing next month.

    Old and New Business:Vogel Properties: Ross Vogel discussed his property on Mt. Branson. He

    began by giving a brief history of the previous request and stated more of theproperty owners had contacted him to purchase their properties. He feels thatmost of the property owners up in that area support the development of the site.He stated that a traffic study had been done. Mr. Pingleton stated that a decision

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    23/32

    should not be made based on how many people are for and against a request.He asked the Planning Commission for advice on how to proceed. Discussionfollowed. Mr. Paulson stated that in order for Mr. Vogel to present the samerequest again, it would have to be changed substantially. To come back beforethe Planning Commission with the same request a significant amount of time

    would have to elapse. Mr. Vogel wanted to know what a substantial changewould be. Mrs. Klinefelter reviewed the reasons the project was denied, andstated that if those issues were addressed, in her opinion the project could beresubmitted. She suggested a new proposal be presented to staff.

    Mrs. Klinefelter asked the Commission to vote to extend the meeting pastnine thirty. The vote to extend the meeting was unanimous.

    Discussion regarding Paul Simons car lot; Mr. Coxie reported the numberof cars on the lot now and stated that Mr. Simon came to the office andpresented a written request to withdraw his project. He reported at that timethat he is currently removing cars on his property. Mr. Coxie stated that it is notyet in compliance but he is working on it. The Commission recommended givingMr. Simon a time frame. Mr. Paulson stated the problems with enforcement.Shawn Pingleton made a motion to give Mr. Simon 30 days (by April 2, 2007) tocomply with the Division III Permit. Joey Staples seconded. The vote to approvewas unanimous.

    Adjournment.With no other business on the agenda for February 20, 2007 a motion

    was made by Jim Brawner to adjourn. Seconded by Craig Trotter. The vote to

    adjourn was unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    24/32

    MINUTES

    TANEY COUNTY PLANNI NG COMMISSION

    PUBLIC HEARINGMONDAY , FEBRUARY 12, 2007, 7:00 P .M.

    ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT, DIVISI ON I I COURTROOM

    TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE

    Call to Order:Chairman Sarah Klinefelter called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. A

    quorum was established with six members present. They were: Sarah Klinefelter,Shawn Pingleton, Jim Brawner, Joey Staples, Randall Cummings, and CraigTrotter. Staff present: Kurt Larsen, Eddie Coxie, Bonita Kissee, Marla Pierce, andBob Paulson.

    Mr. Coxie read and opening statement outlining the public hearingprocedure and presented the exhibits, which are attached to these minutes.

    Video recordings of all Planning Commission meetings are available through thePlanning Department Office.

    Final Votes January 16, 2007:With no quorum established at the January 16, meeting these votes were

    taken on the projects scheduled at that meeting:

    Vickis Daycare: request by Tom and Vicki Fierstine to construct a singlefamily dwelling to use as a residence and day care facility located off St. Hwy. Tto Collins Road. Mr. Brawner commented on state guidelines regarding childcare,and based upon that he made a motion to approve based upon the decision ofrecord with the addition of special use. Craig Trotter seconded. The vote toapprove was unanimous.

    Cottages at Branson Creek: request by GEP to construct a patio homedevelopment containing up to 78 dwelling units located off Branson CreekBoulevard. No added information was presented. Mr. Brawner discussed wholeownership condominium style structures with the applicant. With no other

    discussion Mr. Brawner made a motion to approve based upon the decision ofrecord. Shawn Pingleton seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Sycamore Farms Lot 2: request by Sycamore Farms Investments, LLC tosplit Lot 2 of Sycamore Farms Phase 1 into two parcels for residential housinglocated off Paleo Road. Discussion regarded location and size and review of the

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    25/32

    request. Mr. Brawner made a motion to approve based upon the decision ofrecord. Randall Cummings seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.

    Richard Chappell: request by Brent Chandler to subdivide property locatedat Poverty Gulch Road. Mr. Chandler gave a brief history of the request. Mr.

    Brawner discussed size. Randall Cumming made a motion to approve based uponthe decision of record. Joey Staples seconded. The vote to approve wasunanimous.

    Public Hearings:Lakestyle Cottages: a request by Clinton E. Kasten to develop 3.41 acres

    into a private gated community for single-family residences as detachedcondominiums located at 135 Hammock Way. Eddie Coxie read the staff reportand presented pictures and a video of the site. Greg Whitlock with Great RiverEngineering stated that the structures planned would be whole ownership single-family dwellings owned by the association. The project is a gated community.There are some lots north of the site that the treatment plant is on. The interiorstreet connects with Happy Hollow Resort. The treatment plant is large enoughto support this request and the other phase of the project. Easement rights willbe obtained to cross the road with the utilities. Mr. Kasten addressed otherquestions from the Commission. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

    Dixon Dock Parking: a request by Leo Dixon to provide parking for twocars for a boat dock located at Lot 31 Long Point Subdivision. The project waswithdrawn.

    Westgate Branson Lakes at Emerald Pointe: a request by Mark Waltrip toconstruct two condominium buildings containing 72 units located off EmeraldPointe Dr. Mr. Coxie read the staff report and presented pictures and a video ofthe site. Several property owners signed up to speak. Gary Allman representingthe property owners opposing the request, presented pictures of the site withthe structures and without the structures. He endeavored to show that the viewwould be totally blocked. The property owners feel that these buildings areincompatible with the surrounding area. The existing buildings are four storieshigh and are tiered to make it possible to see the lake. Mr. Allman pointed outthat according to the current code this request does not fall into the compatibilityarea. He does not feel there is enough property to provide the required parking

    spaces. Mr. Allman also stated that this is fill land, which would prohibitunderground parking in his opinion. He also discussed the height of the twobuildings and how the fire district would fight a potential fire. Mr. Allman alsodiscussed wastewater disposal and that the plant is very close to capacity andmight not hold this added wastewater. He presented pictures from around theplant showing dead foliage proving in his opinion that it is leaking. Buffering wasdiscussed by Mr. Allman and that the Code requires buffering between the

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    26/32

    structures. He asked everyone present who oppose this request to stand up,most of the people in the room stood up. Joey Staples asked Mr. Allman if all thestructure in the entire development were four stories, and he stated that theywere. Mr. Pingleton asked Mr. Coxie how the property is currently platted. Mr.Coxie stated that all the property was platted for multi-family and the project had

    already exceeded the limit, and that is why this request is being heard. Mr.Pingleton discussed building height and how projects are platted with Mr. Coxie.Mr. Goben a property owner at Emerald Pointe Villas stated that when hepurchased his property was told that only four-story building would be builtthere. Cornelius Post president of the Homeowners Assoc. reported that thisrequest is on only three acres, and that they own an additional six acres, whichthey will also want to place more structures on and in his opinion there isntroom for the additional boats, cars, etc. Mike Moss a resident in the single-familydwelling part of the development concurred with Mr. Allmans statementsregarding the view, density, and compatibility. Steven Griffith also discussed theview, and compatibility. Bob Rood addressed the parking situation and reportedthat he had researched the parking and found they do not have enough spaces.He left his findings for the file. Other property owners discussed density,compatibility, the view, parking, wastewater, property values, and height.Barbara Sue Thomas another property owner at the Villas, discussed concernsregarding water quality, availability of adequate boat slips, maintenance of thecurrent property, and concurred with what was previously said. Dave Hughesregion manager for Westgate Resorts gave a brief history of the company. Hereported all the properties that the company has purchased in the Branson area,which in his opinion, proves that the company is in the area to stay. AllenJohnson, with General Design Group addressed the concerns of the property

    owners and presented a site plan. He stated that the existing fill would beexcavated, that the parking requirements can be met, engineers have reportedthat the remaining capacity in the wastewater treatment plant is not enough andwill be expanded. DNR has been contacted regarding this. There have beennegotiations with Mr. Snadon regarding boat storage. Mr. Johnson presented apicture of how the request would appear which clearly shows the parking facilityunderground. In terms of the international building code this building would becompatible with the requirements. He stated that he could not deny theimpediment of the view of the properties behind this request, and thencompared the site with other higher story buildings in the area. Mrs. Klinefelterasked about number of acres and where they are located. Mr. Allen explained on

    the site map where the acreage was located. This concluded the public hearingon this request and will proceed to final vote next week.

    Myer Land Sales Office: a request by Myer Land Development Co. toutilize an existing structure as an office located at Sante Fe Ave. Mr. Coxie readthe staff report and presented pictures and a video of the site. Bob Hubbard reada statement from the existing property owners asking the project be denied, for

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    27/32

    reasons of incompatibility, future use, traffic safety, increased traffic, andsuggested building a new road into the subdivision because the road was notconstructed to handle the added traffic. Gary Larmon a property owner in thesubdivision presented the covenants of the subdivision proving that the existingstructure with the requested use would not conform to these restrictions. The

    restrictions also state that no signs can be erected. He stated the same concernspreviously discussed. Chris Myer addressed the concerns and stated that aspecial use permit is requested and that the property was previously a single-family dwelling and a radio station. He presented pictures of the site as itappeared then. In Mr. Myers opinion his company will improve the looks of theproperty, and less water would be used for this use planned. Mr. Myer statedthat a property owner told him that the property owners preferred the structurenot be used as a residence. In Mr. Myers opinion this is a good location for thisuse and would keep the traffic down to a minimum in the subdivision. Thecompany has donated land to make the curve safer. There will only be signs atthe road, and a sign the Myers plan to paint a sign on the structure itself. Thestructure was built in 1988 and a radio tower was also on the site. Mr. Brawnerasked Mr. Larsen what the requirements were for signage. Mr. Larsen stated thaton premise signs were allowed without permits. Gale Myer stated that plans wereto address the road safety issues and an easement has been signed to donate80 to the county for a wider curve and will be also addressed more in the future.In the long term Mr. Myer feels that the structure should be removed. He alsoreported that it is the desire of the company to fit into the topography. Heagreed with the surrounding property owners concerns and stated that they willdo everything they can to make the property a good place to live for everyone.He reported the amount of traffic coming and going on the property would be

    approximately up to three cars a day. This hearing was closed and this projectwill proceed to final vote next week.

    Manna Office: a request by Jerry P. and Mary Ann Gray to construct abuilding for commercial use located at the Corner of Timberlane and St. Hwy.248. Mr. Coxie read the staff report and presented pictures and a video of thesite. Brent Butler representing the applicant presented a site plan and explainedthe request. He stated that Dr. Manna now is the owner of the property havingbought it from the Grays. With no questions or discussion this project willproceed to final vote next week.

    Mrs. Klinefelter asked Mr. Larsen if Mr. Coxie could forgo reading thesummary portion of the staff report since there are so many projects to hear. Mr.Larson explained to the room what the summary consisted of. Mr. Staples madea motion to forgo reading the summary portion at this meeting only. RandallCummings seconded. The vote was unanimous.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    28/32

    Underhill Heights: a request by Jason Brawner to develop a gated

    townhouse community located at Victor Church Road. Mr. Coxie read the staffreport and presented pictures and a video of the site. Tom Goldsworthy wholives on Victor Church Road voiced concerns regarding compatibility, adequatewater supply, wastewater treatment, water pollution, wildlife integrity,

    stormwater retention, and sediment and erosion control. Jason Brawner, thedeveloper addressed the concerns and presented a site plan of the request. Hestated that the intention of the project is to add value to the area. This projectisnt timeshare or nightly rental, and is a pre-retirement community. He statedthat he is a 20 year resident of the area and does not plan to take advantage ofthe area and plans to keep the integrity of the land. He stated that he wants tobe a good neighbor and to be open to the neighbors concerns. Mrs. Klinefelterasked what the price range would be for the houses; Mr. Brawner stated thatthey would range between $100,000 and 150,000. They will have two cargarages and approximately 1200 sq. ft. He explained the location and water andsewer plant plans. There will be a gate at the county road site that can be usedin emergencies, which will be defined as a driveway. Mr. Larsen reminded that inthat case the property would never be eligible for county funds. Naturalvegetation will be left as much as possible, and if not more will be planted. Thisconcluded the hearing for this project and will proceed to final vote next week.

    Crabwell Corners Replat: a request by Richard E. Deppe to replat Lots 11,12, and part of Lot 13 into 4 lots in Crabwell Corners Subdivision at BeaumontLane. Mr. Coxie read the staff report and presented pictures and a video of thesite. Laura Curbow who owns 10 acres next door stated that she was promisedthe land would stay undeveloped. She owns horses and had concerns for them

    and adequate water and wastewater disposal, sediment and erosion control,stormwater runoff, and had concerns for the wildlife. Rodney Curbow wasconcerned with both projects and stated that his concerns were with runoff intothe creeks, adequate water and wastewater, traffic safety, and stated that somefoundations had been put on the property. He was concerned that because hehas a small farm that it would not be compatible with the request. Ron Scott wholives on Beaumont Lane was concerned about boundaries and that all theconstruction stayed within them, he stated that he is the legal owner of tract 13,and also was concerned with adequate water supply, and wastewater,compatibility, road access, and traffic safety. Eddie Wolfe representing thedeveloper addressed the concerns and stated that everything north of the creek

    toward the Underhill project has been platted and that there is only onestructure next to this property. There are two more structures adjacent to theUnderhill property. He addressed the question regarding tract 13 and stated thatthe applicant owns half of it and Mr. Scott owns the other half. Mr. Pingletonasked to look at the site plan. There was further discussion regarding ownershipof Lot 10. Mr. Wolfe addressed the concern and stated that what is in the surveyis what the title company stated that it owns. Clarification by the property

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    29/32

    owners stated that there were more structures bordering the property. Thisconcluded the hearing. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

    Mill Creek Phase 2: a request by Affiliated Investors, Inc. to develop 19.65acres into a single-family residential subdivision at Mill Creek Road. Mr. Coxie

    read the staff report and presented pictures and a video of the site. There beingno discussion this project will proceed to final vote next week.

    A motion was made by Shawn Pingleton to extend the meeting past 9:30p.m. Jim Brawner seconded. The vote to extend the meeting was unanimous.

    Whispering Meadows: a request by Charles Hagston to develop a single-family residential subdivision off Walkington Lane. Mr. Coxie read the staff reportand presented pictures and a video of the site. Bruce Cureton and his sisterspoke in favor of the project because they own 10 lots in Spring Meadows andfeel it would raise their property values. Mr. Staples voiced concerns regardingtraffic on Walkington Lane. Mr. Cureton stated that there are two other accessesinto this property and would not all be from Walkington Lane. Greg Whitlockrepresenting the developer addressed the traffic concern and reported that peaktraffic flow would be 45 vehicles approximately an hour and the impact would beminimal. David Hack lives in the subdivision and is in favor of single-familydwellings in the area and doesnt see the development creating any problems.Charles Hagston the developer stated that this will conform to the existingsubdivision, and he has been in contact with the homeowners assoc. for SpringMeadows and has approval to use the roads within that subdivision for this one.He stated that the road to the countys lift station would be utilized for

    construction vehicles. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

    Pleasant Hollow Estates: a request by Thomas A. & Lawanda M. Gibbs todevelop a single-family residential subdivision off Yandell Cove Road. Mr. Coxieread the staff report and presented pictures and a video of the site. Renee

    Yonkie who lives at the adjoining property was representing some other propertyowners who are concerned with density, stormwater runoff, buffering betweenthe uses, wastewater disposal, sediment and erosion control, restrictions,compatibility, drainage from the road, road maintenance, what will be allowed onthe property (trailers, stick built, livestock), and property values. Mrs. Klinefelterstated that the Gibbs should be consulted regarding some of the questions.

    Eddie Wolfe representing the developers addressed the questions. He stated thatthe existing mobile home will be left there and will be to itself. The road will bemaintained by the homeowners assoc. and be built to county standards. Wellsand septic tanks will serve the property. Plans are for stick built homes and haverestrictions. This will be average style and priced homes. Mr. Pingleton asked ifLot B bordered Yandell Cove Road. Mr. Wolfe stated that it did and that part of itwould be dedicated to the county road. Elvie Combs who lives in Ozark reported

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    30/32

    concerns for some people who live in the neighboring property, regarding thewastewater system. Dallas Dixon stated that the school bus would not originallycome down this road because there was not a turn-around. He constructed aturn-around for them and felt that the developer should provide one. This projectwill proceed to final vote next week.

    Tony Knight: a request by Ms. Knight to operate a bed and breakfast on 6acres off St. Hwy. O. Mr. Coxie read the staff report and presented pictures anda video of the site. Artie Hawkins representing the applicant stated that theproperty sits back from the road. No one signed up to speak. This project willproceed to final vote next week.

    Aable Auto Sales/Storage: a request by Paul Simon to use an existinglocation to store cars and pickups for sale located off ST. Hwy. DD. Mr. Coxieread the staff report and presented pictures and a video of the site. ColbyMitchell discussed concerns of the fluids coming from the cars possibly pollutingthe creek. James Ironside was concerned about water pollution from the cars,Dana Ironside also voiced concerns regarding water pollution, and trashing upthe property. Lyn Mitchell was concerned about traffic, trashing up the propertywith cars, property values, water quality, and type of people. Dennis Case wasconcerned with property values, fluid polluting the creek, and trash on theproperty. Walter Rogers, who owns the property next door, was concerned withhis property values, fluid from the cars going to the creek, and junking up theproperty. Cody Rogers was concerned with site nuisance from the cars, andsafety of children living next door. Tony Todd who has lived next to the propertyall of his life, was concerned with property values, and people this use would

    bring in, and water pollution. Dusty Rogers had the same concerns as the others,including traffic safety. Bill Austin was concerned with site nuisance and propertyvalues. Paul Simon addressed the concerns and stated that he does not plan asalvage yard, and will not sell cars from this property. He stated that he hasspent approximately $5000.00 in cleaning up the place and plans a privacy fencebetween the property and the adjacent residence. He stated that no car wouldleak any fluid from it. He only plans to store the cars there until he has room athis sales lot for them and will store up to 30 cars on the property. He also plansto move the mobile home off the property. Mr. Pingleton voiced a concern abouthow long Mr. Simon plans to leave cars sitting on the property. Mr. Simon didntknow, but that if a car sits on his property very long he will sell it for salvage. He

    stated that if needed he will repair the septic system. He was very adamate thathe will not run a salvage yard. Mr. Pingleton and Mr. Cummings cautioned Mr.Simon about having too many cars on his current lot and Mr. Craig stated that hehad double the amount of cars that the Planning Commission approved. Thisproject will appear for final vote next week.

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    31/32

    Mrs. Klinefelter reminded the room that the hearing next week will be held

    on Tuesday.

    Eastland Hills Estates: a request by Randy Weber to develop a residentialsubdivision off Links Road. Mr. Coxie read the staff report and presented pictures

    and a video of the site. Lisa Owen whose family owns property west of therequest, had several questions regarding density, average lot size, water quality,effect on agricultural land, compatibility, traffic flow, road maintenance, roadaccess, damage to the land, and setbacks. Alan Sulgrove, who owns the dairyfarm next to the property, was concerned about the health of his herd and publichealth, water quality, and wastewater disposal. He suggested using the City ofForsyth sewer system for this project rather than a treatment plant. He askedthat a decision by the Planning Commission be postponed until a study from DNRcan be obtained regarding wastewater discharge from this type of plant. Hestated that he could lose his state permit if his herd suffers contamination by thisdevelopment. Mrs. Klinefelter asked how much land he owns which adjoins thisproject. Mr. Sulgrove stated that he has 40 acres of land joining this request.Danny Hankins pastor of the Riverview Church and Christian School voicedconcerns regarding the road and number of cars passing by the school and thesafety of the children and parishioners. The church owns eleven acres betweentheir property and this one, which an auditorium is planned to be built. EddieWolfe addressed the concerns and stated that Links Road is the only access tothe property, however there is a wide access to the property from the road. Thelots that are planned are very large lots, which will meet the current code.Condominium units are platted. There is detention and retention planned for theproperty and precautions will be taken to prevent pollution to Mr. Sulgroves

    property. The sewer plant will be contracted by a private company to bemaintained continually. Mr. Wolfe asked Mr. Sulgrove if he had any problemswith Rolling Meadows mobile home park discharge. Mr. Sulgrove stated thatsome wildlife previously that were on the property are no longer were there. Mr.Pingleton asked where the City of Forsyth sewer system was. Mr. Wolfe statedthat it is not next door to the property and would be cheaper to build a plant andthat contact had been made with the City regarding their plant. Private groundwould have to be crossed in order to get to the Citys plant. Mrs. Klinefeltercalled this hearing to a close. This project will proceed to final vote next week.

    Old and New Business:

    David Akers, Chateau Cove: Mr. Akers has a client who has purchasedproperty previously approved by the Planning Commission, and would like toproceed with the approval. His question was if the permit could be extended ordoes the Planning Commission want to rehear the request. Mr. Akers gave thehistory of the approval and stated that nothing different will be done. Noextensions have been requested and no work has been done on the site. Mrs.Klinefelter suggested that the applicant start at the beginning of the process

  • 8/14/2019 pzpackets0307

    32/32

    because so much development is being done in that area and the environment iscompletely different from that time. Discussion followed with Mr. Akers statingthat up to a four story building is planned. Mr. Coxie reported that some of theapprovals given in that vicinity have been controversial. Mr. Paulson suggestedto Mr. Akers that it might be worthwhile for him to advise his clients to proceed

    to the Division III process for this reason. After discussion a motion was made byJim Brawner to allow this meeting to be used for the Concept Hearing and allowthe project to proceed to public hearing, with the proper paperwork delivered tothe office. Joey Staples seconded. The vote was unanimous.

    Mr. Coxie reported that LTs Honky Tonk will appear next meeting for finalvote, and also reported that Mr. Larsen suggested that this project be deniedbecause of the amount of land and sewer system concerns.

    Mr. Coxie then reported that Vogel Properties request would be discussedat the next meeting under old and new business at their request.

    Discussion followed regarding the Simon request and amount of cars andthe notice of violation.

    Adjournment:With no other business on the agenda for February 12, 2007 a motion

    was made by Randall Cummings to adjourn. Seconded by Joey Staples. The voteto adjourn was unanimous. The meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m.