Top Banner

of 49

PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

Jun 02, 2018

Download

Documents

Vigna Ruban Ram
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    1/49

    PVTPressure Volume Temperature

    (Parts 1 & 2)

    Reservoir Engineering I

    (PCB2023)

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    2/49

    Outcomes

    To describe various tests under PVT study

    To relate oil physical properties generated

    from PVT study for MBE applications

    To determine gas physical properties from

    PVT study

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    3/49

    Importance of PVT Analysis

    Provides data for field evaluation and design

    Reservoir calculations

    Well flow calculations

    Surface facilities

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    4/49

    Scope of PVT Analysis Scope of the analysis depends on the nature of the fluid.

    Oil systems: Black oil and volatile oil

    Bubble point pressure, composition of reservoir and produced fluids, Bo, GOR, oil

    viscosity, Co.

    Below Pbconsiderations: Bg, Bt, Z, gas viscosity.

    Properties are measured as functions of pressure.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    5/49

    Scope of PVT Analysis Dry gas:

    composition, specific gravity, Bg, z, and viscosity Wet gas:

    as above plus information on liquid drop out, quantities and compositions.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    6/49

    Scope of PVT Analysis

    Gas condensate:

    Reflect wet gas and oil.

    Dew point pressure

    Compressibility above Pd. Impact of dropping below Pd

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    7/49

    Sampling

    Clearly the sample has to representative of

    the reservoir contents or the drainage area.

    Desirable to take samples early in the life ofthe reservoir.

    Either sub-surface or surface sampling.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    8/49

    Sub-Surface Sampling

    Can only be

    representative whenpressure at sampling

    point is above or equal

    to the saturation

    pressure.

    At pressure close to

    saturation pressure

    serious possibility of

    sample integrity beinglost.

    In recent years

    considerable advance in

    downhole fluid sampling

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    9/49

    Surface Sampling

    Samples of oil and gas taken from a specialseparator connected with the well called the

    test separator.

    Fluids recombined in the laboratory on thebasis of the produced GOR.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    10/49

    Surface Sampling The separation of oil

    and gas as predicted

    by the phase diagramresults in each phase

    having its own phase

    diagram.

    The oil exists at itsbubble point .

    The gas exists at its

    dew point.

    This behavior has

    important implications

    on well sampling

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    11/49

    Equipment for PVT Analysis

    Apparatus for transfer and recombination ofseparator oil and gas samples.

    Apparatus for measuring gas and liquid

    volumes

    Apparatus for performing separator tests

    PVT cell and displacing pumps.

    High pressure viscometer

    Gas chromatograph or equivalent.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    12/49

    Main PVT Tests

    Quality check of surface samples

    Compositional measurements

    Flash vaporization (Constant composition

    expansion, CCE) or relative volume test

    Differential vaporization test

    Separator tests

    Density measurements

    Viscosity measurements

    Special studies: e.g. Interfacial tension

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    13/49

    Quality check of Surface samples

    Samples received in the laboratory are evaluated for theirintegrity, primarily by measuring the opening pressure and

    comparing with the reported sampling conditions.

    This may be examined by heating the sampling bottles to

    the sampling temperature.

    Any leakage from a sampling bottle containing a gas-liquid

    mixture will change the sample composition.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    14/49

    Compositional measurements

    An important test on all reservoir fluid samples is the

    determination of the fluid composition.

    The most common method of compositional analysis of high

    pressure fluids is to flash a relatively large volume of the

    fluid sample at the atmospheric pressure to form generallytwo stabilized phases of gas and liquid. The gas and liquid

    phases are commonly analyzed by gas chromatography and

    distillation, respectively.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    15/49

    Flash Vaporization (CCE or Relative Volume) Test

    Determination of the correlation between pressure

    and volume at reservoir temperature.

    The system never changes during the test.

    The gas remains in equilibrium with the oil through

    out the test.

    The behavior below the bubble point does not

    reflect reservoir behavior, where gas has greater

    mobility than the oil.

    This test determines the Bubble Pointpressure

    corresponding to the reservoir temperature.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    16/49

    Flash Vaporization (CCE or

    Relative Volume ) Test

    Liberated gas remains in equilibrium with oil

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    17/49

    Flash Vaporization (CCE or Relative Volume ) Test

    By plotting P versus V, a break in the slope is obtained at

    the Bubble Point pressure.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    18/49

    Flash Vaporization (CCE or

    Relative Volume ) Test

    Tests at constant pressure

    and varying temperature

    enables thermal expansion

    coefficient to be obtained for

    well flow calculations.

    12

    2 2 1

    1 1 2 2

    V VThermal expansion,V T T

    V volume at T , V volume at T

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    19/49

    Flash Vaporization (CCE or Relative Volume )

    Test

    Above bubble point compressibility ofoil at reservoir temperature can be

    determined.

    No free gas

    2 1

    2 1 2

    2 2

    1 1

    V Vc

    V P P

    V =volume at pressure P

    V =volume at pressure P

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    20/49

    Exercise 1 Flash vaporization

    The data from a flash vaporization on a black oil at 220 oF are

    given. DeterminePband prepare a table of relative volume forthe reservoir fluid study. (data in example 10-1, Mc Cain)

    Pressure (psig) Total Volume (cc)

    5000 61.030

    4500 61.435

    4000 61.866

    3500 62.341

    3000 62.8662900 62.974

    2800 63.088

    2700 63.208

    2605 63.455

    2591 63.576

    2516 64.291

    2401 65.532

    2253 67.400

    2090 69.901

    1897 73.655

    1698 78.676

    1477 86.224

    1292 95.050

    1040 112.715

    830 136.908

    640 174.201

    472 235.700

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    21/49

    Differential Vaporization

    Differential liberation process

    Flash liberation process

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    22/49

    Differential Vaporization

    The test has been designed to simulate gas-

    liquid equilibrium system in oil reservoirs atpressures below the bubble point pressure.

    The test starts from the bubble point pressure.

    By this test it can be determined: solution gas-oil ratio, relative oil volume, total solution gas-

    oil ratio at the bubble-point pressure, Z factor,

    gas formation volume factor, and relative total

    volume.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    23/49

    Differential Vaporization 8-10 pressure reduction steps at reservoir temperature.

    Final step to 60oF.

    Remaining oil Residual Oil

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    24/49

    Differential Vaporization

    1. Solution gas oil ratio RsD

    OUTPUTSfrom Differential Vaporization test

    2. Relative Oil Volume, BoD

    Volume of oil at each pressure divided by volume of oil at std conditions

    (14.7 psia & 60 oF)

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    25/49

    Differential Vaporization

    OUTPUTSfrom Differential Vaporization test

    3. Total solution gas oil ratio at Pb, RsD

    4. Z factorRscsc

    scRR

    TpV

    TpVz

    5. Gas formation volume factor,p

    zTBg 0282.0

    6. Relative Total Volume,BtD

    )( sDsDbgoDtD RRBBB

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    26/49

    Exercise 2: Differential Vaporization

    The data from a differential vaporization on a black oil at 220 oF

    are given. Prepare a table of solution gas-oil ratios, relative oilvolumes, and relative total volumes by this differential process.

    Also include z-factors and formation volume factors of the

    increments of gas removed.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    27/49

    Exercise 2: Differential Vaporization

    Solution:

    E i 2 Diff ti l V i ti

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    28/49

    Exercise 2: Differential Vaporization

    Solution:

    E i 2 Diff ti l V i ti

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    29/49

    Exercise 2: Differential Vaporization

    Solution:

    Exercise 2: Differential Vaporization

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    30/49

    Exercise 2: Differential VaporizationSolution:

    Exercise 2: Differential Vaporization

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    31/49

    Exercise 2: Differential VaporizationSolution:

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    32/49

    Separator TestsObjectives To determine impact of separator conditions on Bo, GOR, and

    produced fluid physical properties. To determine the optimum operating conditions of the separator

    Procedure

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    33/49

    Separator Tests

    Separator volume factor = L1/L2

    PVT Cell pressure kept atbubble point

    Separator volume factor = L1/L2

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    34/49

    Separator TestsCalculations

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    35/49

    Exercise 3: Separator Test

    Data from a separator test on a black oil are given. Note that the volume

    of separator liquid was measured at separator pressure andtemperature before it was released to the stock tank. Calculate the

    formation volume factor and solution gas oil ratio.

    Volume of oil at Pb and Tres = 182.637 cc

    Volume of separator liquid at 100 psig and 75 oF = 131.588 cc

    Volume of stock-tank oil at 0 psig and 75 oF = 124.773 cc

    Volume of stock-tank oil at 0 psig and 60 oF = 123.906 cc

    Volume of gas removed from separator = 0.52706 scf

    Volume of gas removed from stock tank = 0.07139 scf

    SG of stock tank oil = 0.8217

    SG of stock separator gas = 0.786

    SG of stock tank gas = 1.363

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    36/49

    Solution of Exercise 3

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    37/49

    Selection of Separator ConditionsThe optimum operating pressure is identified from the separator

    tests as the separator pressure which results in a minimum of

    total gas-oil ratio, a minimum in formation volume factor of oil (atbubble point), and a maximum in stock-tank oil gravity (API).

    Example of selecting optimum separator conditions for Good Oil

    Co. Well No. 4.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    38/49

    Flash vaporization is used to characterize reservoir fluid above and below reservoir

    bubble point pressure.

    Differential vaporization considered to be representative of the process in the

    reservoir below bubble point pressure.

    Separator test considered to be representative of the process from the bottom of the

    well to the stock tank when the reservoir pressure is equal or less than Pb.

    COMPARISON BETWEEN THE

    THREE TESTS

    Under these assumptions, fluid properties abovebubble

    point pressure can be estimated by a combination of Flashvaporization and separator test.

    Fluid properties belowbubble point pressure can be simulated

    by a combination of differential vaporization and separator test.

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    39/49

    OIL FORMATION VOLUME FACTOR

    FOR MBE & RESERVOIR STUDIES

    At pressures above bubble-point pressure, oil formation volume factors

    are calculated from a combination of flash vaporization data and

    separator test data.

    P Pb

    At pressures below the bubble-point pressure, oil formation

    volume factors are calculated from a combination of

    differential vaporization data and separator test data.

    P Pb

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    40/49

    Example of Oil Formation Volume Factor Data

    Oil Formation Volume Factor at 200 F

    1.000

    1.100

    1.200

    1.300

    1.400

    1.500

    1.600

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

    Pressure, psig

    OilFormationVo

    lumeFacto

    bbl/stb

    exp sim

    SOLUTION GAS OIL RATIO

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    41/49

    SOLUTION GAS OIL RATIO

    FOR MBE & RESERVOIR STUDIES

    Solution gas-oil ratio at pressures above bubble-point pressure is a

    constant equal to the solution gas-oil ratio at the bubble point.

    @ P Pb

    Solution gas-oil ratios at pressures below, bubble-point pressure are

    calculated from a combination of differential vaporization data and

    separator test data.

    @ P < Pb

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    42/49

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    43/49

    GAS FORMATION VOLUME FACTOR

    FOR MBE & RESERVOIR STUDIES

    Gas formation volume factors are calculated with z-factors measured

    with the gases removed from the cell at each pressure step during

    differential vaporization.

    TOTAL FORMATION VOLUME FACTOR

    Total formation volume factors may be

    calculated as

    If relative total volumes, Btare reported as a part of the results of the

    differential vaporization, total formation factors can be calculated as:

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    44/49

    COEFFICIENT OF ISOTHERMAL

    COMPRESSIBILITY OF OIL

    The following Equation may be used with the flash vaporization data to

    calculate oil compressibility at pressures above the bubble point.

    When the pressure is below the bubble point pressure, the following

    equation can be used to calculate the Co

    Density measurements

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    45/49

    Density measurements

    Oil Density at 200 F

    0.700

    0.720

    0.740

    0.760

    0.780

    0.800

    0.820

    0.840

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

    Pressure, psig

    OilDensity,g

    /cc

    exp sim

    Density of oil at reservoir temperature and different pressures

    can be measured by an instrument attached to the PVT cell.

    Example of Density Data

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    46/49

    Viscosity measurements

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    47/49

    Oil and Gas Viscosity

    0.000

    0.500

    1.000

    1.500

    2.000

    2.500

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

    Pressure, psig

    Viscosity

    ,cP

    Oil viscosity Gas viscosity

    Example of Viscosity Data

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    48/49

    Special Studies of Reservoir Fluids:

    Different methods of enhanced oil recovery (EOR)

    require different reservoir fluid studies.

    Examples:

    EOR by miscible gas injection requires measuring the

    minimum miscibility pressure.

    EOR by surfactant flooding requires measuring the interfacial

    tension.

    EOR by foam flooding requires measuring foaming ability ofthe surfactant used in presence of reservoir fluids.

    High Pressure / High Temperature, HP/HT

  • 8/11/2019 PVT_Dr M Idrees_Parts 1 and 2

    49/49

    High Pressure / High Temperature, HP/HT

    Fluids

    Recent years exploration activity has moved deeper.

    High pressure and temperature accumulations found

    Conventional PVT facilities do not enable testing

    these fluids. Ranges 250oC and 20,000 psi.

    At these conditions role of water cannot be ignored.