Prison and Probation Challenges Punishment across Europe Natalia Delgrande, part-time lecturer & research associate School of Criminal Sciences, University of Lausanne, Switzerland VIII Annual Conference of Legal Assessment in Prisons (Compartim Knowledge Manadgment Programme of Department of Justice in Catalonia) Barcelona, October, 1 st , 2014 Avís legal Aquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Reconeixement 3.0 de Creative Commons. Se'n permet la reproducció, la distribució, la comunicació del material sempre que se citi l’autoria del material i el Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada (Departament de Justícia) i no se'n faci un ús comercial ni es transformi per generar obres derivades. La llicència Reconeixement–No comercial–Sense obres derivades es pot consultar a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.ca .
27
Embed
Punishment across Europe. Prison and Probation challenges. Natalia Delgrande
Ponència de la Jornada de Juristes de Centres Penitenciaris que va tenir lloc al Centre d'Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada, l'1 d'octubre de 2014
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Prison and Probation Challenges
Punishment across Europe
Natalia Delgrande, part-time lecturer & research associate School of Criminal Sciences, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
VIII Annual Conference of Legal Assessment in Prisons (Compartim Knowledge Manadgment Programme of Department of Justice in Catalonia)
Barcelona, October, 1st, 2014
Avís legalAquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Reconeixement 3.0 de Creative Commons. Se'n permet la reproducció, la distribució, la comunicació del material sempre que se citi l’autoria del material i el Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada (Departament de Justícia) i no se'n faci un ús comercial ni es transformi per generar obres derivades. La llicència Reconeixement–No comercial–Sense obres derivades es pot consultar a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.ca .
Contents
1. Introduction (SPACE project)
2. Current situation in Prison and Probation
3. Evolution…
4. Prison versus Probation: what alternatives?
5. Probation… or “alternatives” to Probation?
6. Conclusion (avenues for reflection…)
3
1. Introduction (SPACE project)
PROJECT
1. CoE tool for practice and research
2. GOAL: Long-time series & target an.
3. BASIS: Strong methodological background
NETWORK
1. National Prison and Probation administrations
2. Researchers3. National &
International organisations
RESEARCH
1. R&D: validity of the raw-data
2. Update of the definitions
3. Comparability4. Indicators
PRACTICE
1. Professional toolbox for reforms
2. Annual [internal] reports
3. Projections4. …
4
2.1 Prison 2.2 Probation
5
2.1 Current situation in Prison [2012]
RUS
TUR
ESP
UKR
FRA
FIN
SWE
DEU
ITA
POL
NOR
BLR
ROU
ISL
BGR
GRC
PRT
IRL
AZE
CZE
SRB
AUT HUN
LVA
LTU
GEO
BIH
SVK
HRV
EST
UK:ENG&WAL
CHE
BEL
NLD
ALB
ARM
MKD
SVN
UK:SCO
MDA
DNK
MNE
UK:NIR
CYP
LUX
AND
MLT
LIE
SMRMCO
PRISON POPULATIONPER 100,000 INHABITANTS
1ST SEPTEMBER 2012
Less than 100
From 100 to less than 150
From 150 to less than 200
From 200 to less than 250
250 and over
Data not supplied
Not a CoE Member State
HIGHEST Prison Pop. Rates (more than 200 inmates per 100,000 inhabitants):
1. Increase of the proportion of foreign inmates in
custody [2000-2012]: +2%/annually
2. In 2012, about 40% of all non-national prisoners
across EU countries were EU-citizens
Framework Decisions [FD] on the transfer of prisoners and on probation are not fully implemented
18
4.2 Alternatives? Short sentences
How many under alternatives…?
19
4.3 Challenges
20
5.1 Do we need it? 5.2 Example…
21
5.1 Do we need it?
1. Probation became part of the CJS
2. The misuse of the “fashionable” practices contributes to the net-widening effect
3. Sometimes, the criminal stigma persists
4. At the implementation level… “we cannot change the law but we can apply it in a different way” (specialised educator)
22
5.2 Example…of misuse
Recommendation CM/Rec(2014)4 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on electronic monitoring
“SCOPE:
• […] It is also intended to bring to the attention of national authorities that particular care needs to be taken when using electronic monitoring not to undermine or replace the building of constructive professional relationships with suspects and offenders by competent staff dealing with them in the community […]”
“STAFF:
• 5. Staff entrusted with the imposition or execution of electronic monitoring shall be regularly updated and trained on the handling, use and impact of the equipment on the persons concerned.
• 6. Staff shall be trained to install and uninstall technology and provide technical assistance and support in order to ensure the efficient and accurate functioning of the equipment.”
Victim Marie: 19 y. old womanPerpetrator’s ex-girlfriend
Perpetrator Claude D.: 40 y. old man
Facts Mai, 2013: Sequestrated, raped, and murdered Marie
Prior criminal record
Jan., 1998: Sequestration, rape, and murder of his ex-girlfriend
EM End of the 20 years’ prison sentence at 2/3 of his sentence home arrest with EM (ankle bracelet without GPS)
Risk Among 10 most dangerous offenders in Switzerland (psychopathic personality)
23
DEU & CHE:
New forms of penal sanctions [measures]. Enforcement in “appropriate” institutions
1.Socio-therapeutic institutions (sometimes private & fully extra-judicial) together with voluntary placements…
2.Centres for drug and alcohol addicts…
5.2 Example…of [promising] use
24
5.2 Example…of [promising] use
CJ: penal measure
(sentence imposed)
0
FEEDBACK social
inclusion
Final
Extra-penal institutions
2.1
ENFORCEMENT Execution
authority: start point of the
network
1
Judicial partnership (not control)
cPro-social desinstitu alisation
a
If needed: custodial network
2.2
Education +
treatment
b
25
Conclusion
STATISTICAL conditions:1. (Formal) rules of the collection and production of statistics
2. (Informal) application of these rules
LEGAL conditions:1. (Formal) differences between legislation and legal process
2. (Informal) differences relating to their application
IMPLEMENTATION conditions:1. Reliability on the network level (legal, implementation, results)
2. Likelihood of detection of specific cases
3. Reporting propensities between services concerned , etc.
(Based on Westfelt & Estrada, 2005)
26
Conclusion
Alternatives… Yes! But alternatives to what?...New persons new Probation statistics……but how many of them are under alternatives to custody?
National and international projections… do they follow the same trend?
1. CoE recommendations go in the line with the reduction of the use of custody by… implementing alternatives.
2. In some European countries, the national figures show the increase in both, prison and probation populations.
3. New forms of CSM: is there always a need of something new? meta-analyses are not unanimous…