7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
1/26
PUBLIC RHETORIC:
DRAMATISM
By:
CERLINDA MUIN (2010980657)
FATIN MAHIRAH SOLLEH (2010979243)
1
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
2/26
2
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
3/26
WHO IS KENNETH BURKE?
NAME: Kenneth Duva Burke (May 5, 1897
Nov 19, 1993)
BORN :Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Vocations: Editor, Essayist, Literary Critic,
Novelist, Philosopher, Poet, Professor,
Reviewer, Rhetorician, Social Commentator,
Translator
3
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
4/26
HIS WORKS
The White Oxen. New York: A. & C. Boni, 1924.
Counter-Statement. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1931.
Towards a Better Life, Being a Series of Epistles, or Declamations. New York:
Harcourt, Brace, 1932.
Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. New York: New Republic, 1935.
The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Baton Rouge: Louisiana
State UP, 1941; revised and abridged edition, New York: Vintage, 1957.
A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1945.
A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1950.
Books of Moments: Poems 1915-1954. Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publications, 1955.
The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Boston: Beacon Press, 1961.
Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: U of
California P, 1966.
Dramatism and Development. Worcester, MA: Clark UP, 1972.4
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
5/26
CONTEXT Rhetoric is the art of effective or
persuasive speaking or writing.
For example the use of figures of
speech and compositional
techniques.
At its best, rhetoric is a thoughtful,
reflective activity leading toeffective communication.
Rhetoric typically provide
heuristics for understanding,
discovering, and developing
arguments for particular situations,such as Aristotle's three
persuasive audience appeals:
LOGOS
(LOGICAL)
ETHOS
(ETHICAL)
PATHOS
(EMOTIONAL)
The line ofargument in thespeech.
The way thespeakers character
is revealed viamessage.
The feeling thespeech draws outthe listeners.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
6/26
THE DEVELOPMENT OF RHETORIC
Since Homer in the 8th century BC, wisdom ('sophos') and skill were
prized. The Sophistswere originally itinerant poets and teachers who
spread learning and culture .
The Sophistswere the effective lawyers and advised on governance
and the new Athenian democracy.
Over time, the Sophistsfocused more on eloquent speech and rhetoric,
making grand claims about their ability to answer all questions.
Aristotle also helped separate out philosophy as a separate school,
leaving sophism as being largely about the techniques of rhetoric.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
7/26
Whilst Aristotle denounced the sophists, he also refined rhetoric in 'The Art of
Rhetoric', documenting and defining its rules and methods in the various forms of
Aristotelian argument.
In Rome, Cicero, with his 'Rhetorica ad Herennium'and Quintilian developed rhetoric
further and the five canons of rhetoric was very influential for centuries.
Across the centuries from the Greeks and Romans, various writers continued to
explore, refine and re-define rhetoric, including:
1. St. Augustine (354-430), in 'De Doctrina Christiana.'
2. Boethius (~480-524), in his 'Overview of the Structure of Rhetoric.'
3. Erasmus (~1466-1536)in 'De Duplici Copia Verborum et Rerum.'
4. Juan Luis Vives (1492-1540) in 'Rhetoricae' and other works.
5. Thomas Wilson's 'The Arte of Rhetorique' (1553)
Eloquent persuasion became a mainstay of the civilized intellectual as well as the
courtier's preferred mode of speech. From the Romans to the Middle Ages, rhetoric
was taught as a liberal art alongside logic and grammar.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
8/26
Rhetoric thus became a mainstay of priests, lawyers,
politicians, writers and all who would persuade, in
particular those who addressed a wide audience.
From the Greek 'rhetor' who addressed juries to modern
leaders who address global audiences, rhetoric is a
indeed a powerful tool.
Today, the use of the word 'rhetoric' sometimes
approaches a derogatory form, implying the use of fancylanguage to persuade, much as sophism lost credibility
amongst the Greeks, and much for the same reason.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
9/26
DEVELOPMENT OF DRAMATISM
-Burke is a symbolic theorist who pays attention to language
as a strategic human response to a specific situation.
-He considered clusters of words as dances of attitudes.
-Thus, the critic's should focuses on why a writer or speaker
selected the words that were choreographed into specific
message.
-Burke suggests the word dramatism to describe what he saw
going on when people start communicate.
-Dramatism was influenced by Aristotle's Rhetoric but was
less concerned with the persuasion but more on identication.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
10/26
-Burke used the word "substance" as the key term to describe a person's physical
characteristics, talents, occupation, experiences, personality, beliefs, and
attitudes.
-The more overlap between the substance of the speaker and the listener,
the greater the identification is.
-Burke was influenced by religious description of Martin Luther King's that was
based on Old Testament and further perceived identification as
'consubstantiation.'
-The main idea of dramatism lays on identification, without it, no persuasion
happen.
-Burke's idea of dramatism get attention after Marie Hochmuth Nichols, arhetorician from University of Illinois shown the significant contribution of the
theory to the field of communication.
-Since that, thousand of communication scholars have used his persepctives as a
methodology to analyze public adress and other forms of symbolic action.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
11/26
Burkesperspectives
Identification
Thedramatic
pentad
Guiltredemption
cycle
11
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
12/26
IDENTIFICATION
Identification isconsubstantial.
Effective
communicator canshow
consubstantiality bygiving sign inlanguage and
delivery that his orher properties arethe same as theirs
Speaker couldalter the linguisticstrategy to match
the hearerssophisticated
style
Identificationworks in both
ways: audience
adaption not onlygives the
evangelist achance to swaythe audience, italso helps the
preacher fit intothe culturalmainstream.
12
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
13/26
BURKES DRAMATISM:
Life is drama. The dramatistic pentad of , and
is the tool for discovering
a speakers motives.
Without audience identification with the speaker, there is
no persuasion.
13
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
14/26
How the speaker talk what their talk about are based on 5
elements:
14
ACT: whatwas done
SCENE:
Where andwhen theact was
performed
AGENT:Person
whoperformed
the act.
AGENCY:stimulus,the agent
used to dothe deed.
PURPOSE:the goal.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
15/26
GUILT REDEMPTION CYCLE
MORTIFICATION Confession of guilt and
request for forgiveness.
VICTIMAGE
Scapegoating the processof naming an externalenemy as the source of allpersonal or public ills.
15
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
16/26
APPLICATION
Rhetorical theory is a way in which persuasion can be
used successfully.
The most common use of rhetorical theory is used within
political speeches.
Dramatism theory may be used widely in persuasive
speech, political speeches, or attention-grabbing tools.
Other than that, this theory also might be practically use
in theatre, acting, selling or may be in advertising.16
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
17/26
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
18/26
STRENGTHS
Rhetoric and dramatism skill are used widely in
order to grab peoples attention, to make them
understand, and apply it.
Its more than to persuade and to convince
people. It is the art of making people think
what the speaker has thought and practice. History has proven, a powerful speech has
changed the world and the whole content. 18
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
19/26
WEAKNESSES
Aristotle discussion of emotional proof does not really deal
with the power of speakers who rely on shock, charisma,
dynamism. His discussion may really have been targeted at
elites rather than the average people.
He promises analysis in terms of logical ethical and emotional
appeals, but actually structure his argument in terms of
speakers, speech and audience.
Lecture note form leaves many holes , lack of precision in
terms. 19
CO S C Q S
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
20/26
COMMENTS AND CRITIQUES
Burkes ideas was closely tied to symbolic interactionism
Burkes tends to flood his text with literary allusions
His writing invite active reader participation as he surrounds an idea.
He also has done us all a favor by celebrating the life-giving quality of
language.
The integrated procedure offers five artistic element tools for the critic to use
in analyzing human interaction.
It is very helpful for pinpointing a speakers motivation and the way the
speech serves that need or desire.
Burkes concept of rhetoric as identification was a major advance in a field of
knowledge that many scholars had thought complete.
He gave it contemporary luster by showing that common ground is the
foundation of emotional appeal.
His ethical stands; he refuse to let desirable ends justify unfair meaning
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
21/26
CONCLUSION
Dramatism is a very complex theory with a very
interpretive perspective. The basic idea is that
everything in life can be viewed as drama, complete
with a plot, actors, setting etc.
It also describes three lenses with which we can
view life: identification, dramatistic pentad, and
guild-redemption cycle. Dramatism focuses on the
role of the critic and their responsibility of
uncovering a speakers motives.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
22/26
SUMMARY
Burkes theory has teaches us to analyze the social movements,
using a simple dramatic ratios like the dramatic pentad, he
give us the tools to understand and critique speech, a
campaign, a social movement or a revolution. Lastly, Burkes
method is infused with the idea of moral choice and good in
unmasking hidden meaning and coded phrases.
Rhetoric is a thoughtful, reflective activity leading to effective
communication or writing and use of figure speech ,
compositional techniques and language designer to have a
persuasive or impressive effect.22
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
23/26
KEY TERMS
Identification Guilt redemption cycle
Dramatic pentad
Rhetoric
Mortification
Victimage
Logical
Ethical
Emotional
23
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
24/26
REFERENCES
Chambers, S. (2009). Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass
Democracy. Rhetoric and Public Sphere, 323-350.
Fulford, R. L. (1976). Platonism and Dramatism. Kenneth Burke's Dialectic,
n/a.
Griffin, E. (2008). A First Look at Communication Theory. New York: McGraw
Hill.
Kuypers, J. A. (2005). The Art of Rhetorical Criticism. USA: Pearson.
Smith, R. M. (2008). The Case of George W. Bush. Religious Rhetoric and
Ethic of Public Discourse, 272-300.
Weisberg, E. (1984). Kenneth Burke's Dramatism. The Rhetoric of Criticism,
n/a.
Weiser, M. E. (2004). The Development of Kenneth Burke's Dramatism.
Word Man at War, n/a.
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
25/26
25
7/31/2019 Public Rhetoric
26/26
THE END
THANK YOU
26