Public-Led Structured Finance: Public-Led Structured Finance: Overcoming Coordination Overcoming Coordination Failures? Failures? Augusto de la Torre, Augusto de la Torre, Juan Carlos Gozzi, Juan Carlos Gozzi, Sergio Schmukler Sergio Schmukler Conference “Access to Finance” Conference “Access to Finance” March 15-16, 2007 March 15-16, 2007 World Bank World Bank
31
Embed
Public-Led Structured Finance: Overcoming Coordination Failures? Augusto de la Torre, Juan Carlos Gozzi, Sergio Schmukler Conference Access to Finance.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Augusto de la Torre, Augusto de la Torre, Juan Carlos Gozzi, Juan Carlos Gozzi, Sergio SchmuklerSergio Schmukler
Conference “Access to Finance”Conference “Access to Finance”
March 15-16, 2007March 15-16, 2007
World BankWorld Bank
2
De la Torre, A., J.C. Gozzi Valdez, and S. Schmukler, 2006. Innovative Experiences in Access to Finance: Market Friendly Roles for the Visible Hand? World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Regional Study
Background MaterialBackground Material
3
1. Role of the Public Sector
2. Two Cases
3. Final Thoughts
Structure of the PresentationStructure of the Presentation
4
1. Role of the Public Sector
2. Two Cases
3. Final Thoughts
Structure of the PresentationStructure of the Presentation
5
Two contrasting and well-established views on the role of the public sector in broadening access to finance
Role of the Public SectorRole of the Public Sector
6
Development policyStrategic or socially important sectors (SMEs, agriculture, low-income housing) are underdeveloped and will not take off by themselvesProtection (temporary) and government investment is needed Growth strategies focused on accelerating capital accumulation and technological adoption through direct government intervention
Financial sector policyWidespread market failures – markets will not finance take-offGovernment should mobilize and allocate finance to strategic or socially important sectors
Public banksA policy vehicle/instrument that is functional in this contextSelective allocation of credit could also be done via regulation of private banks
The general experience with public banking and direct lending in developing countries has not been successful
Government bank ownership associated with lower financial development, wider spreads, and slower economic growth
Major incentive and governance problems in public banks’ operations result in recurrent fiscal drains
Inherent contradiction between social policy mandates and pressures to avoid losses (“Sisyphus syndrome”)
There have been some exceptions (i.e., BAAC in Thailand)
Widespread government intervention leads to financial repression
Below market rates reduce savings and efficiency of the financial sector (McKinnon, 1973)
Low returns on financial assets encourages savers to keep their savings outside the financial system
Interventionist ViewInterventionist View
8
Development policyDevelopment is hampered by heavy-handed government intervention
Government failure is widespread and outweighs market failures
Let markets breath and work (openness, privatization) and focus on strengthening “enabling” environment (macroeconomic stability, rule of law, property rights)
Financial sector policyLiberalize financial markets and shift focus to prudential oversightImprove contractual environment (creditor and minority shareholder rights, contract enforcement, accounting/disclosure, credit bureaus)
Public banksThey become de-contextualizedPrivatize or liquidate public banks (at least move to 2nd tier)Remaining public banks in search of new identity
Laissez-Faire ViewLaissez-Faire View
9
However, improving the enabling environment for financial markets is not a straightforward process
Institutional arrangements are self-reinforcing (although not always efficient) due to substantial increasing returnsFinancial development is not amenable to a “one size fits all” approach due to its evolutionary, path-dependent nature
Despite intense reform efforts, access in most segments has not increased
Gap between expectations and outcomes might be explained by impatience or insufficient reform implementationDisappointment may also be explained by excessively high expectations at the beginning of the reform process
Institutional reforms take a long time to maturePolitical pressures to broaden access in the short runUnrealistic to expect governments to remain completely disengaged from any direct intervention during the long transition
Laissez-Faire ViewLaissez-Faire View
10
Development policyLinks between reforms and development are elusive and studies of growth determinants give little policy guidanceIgniting growth and sustaining growth are different thingsProblems (poverty, low growth, inequality) are pressingBe heterodox, identify the binding constraint to mitigate second best
Need to avoid a template approach
Financial sector policyMarkets can and do broaden access to finance
Role of the government is to promote deep and efficient markets, not replace themInstitutional efficiency is the economy’s first best
However, well-designed, restricted interventions to address specific market failures can broaden accessGo back to basics, readjust expectations, and be creative
Pro-Market Activism ViewPro-Market Activism View
11
New roles for the public sectorShare risk (e.g., through partial credit guarantees)
Pool risk and group otherwise atomized borrowers
Facilitate achievement of economies of scale to lower costs
Encourage adoption of technological and financial innovation
Solve coordination failures, aligning incentives of stakeholders
Type of activitiesSelective interventions
Relatively small and temporaryFocused on solving specific market failures in cost-effective mannerTailored to specific needs and institutional settings
Pro-Market Activism ViewPro-Market Activism View
12
Public Provision of Market InfrastructureBANSEFI (Mexico)NAFIN’s Reverse Factoring Program (Mexico)Correspondent Banking (Brazil)
Structured FinanceFIRA (Mexico)
Credit Guarantee SystemsFOGAPE (Chile)
Transaction Cost SubsidiesSIEBAN (Mexico)
MicrofinanceBancoEstado (Chile)
Recent Pro-Market Experiences from Recent Pro-Market Experiences from Latin AmericaLatin America
13
1. Access to Finance
2. Role of the Public Sector
3. Two Cases
4. Final Thoughts
Structure of the PresentationStructure of the Presentation
14
Problem: Coordination problem among stakeholdersFinanciers lack adequate information about borrowers
Agents with knowledge about borrowers lack funds to invest
Allocation of risks and costs among participants is not clear
Solution: Pooling and securitization of credit rightsAgent with informational advantage extends credit to borrowers, reducing principal-agent problems
Credit rights are transferred to a special purpose vehicle (SPV, separate legal entity)
Participations in the SPV are sold to investors
Pooling allows investors to diversify risk among many borrowers and reduce transaction costs
Clear assignment of risks and benefits among participants
Securities can be sold in tranches to achieve market segmentation and cater to different investors
Structured FinanceStructured Finance
15
Some factors limit the penetration of structured finance in emerging markets
Lack of adequate laws and regulations
Unfamiliarity of market participants and seeming complexity of transactions
Tailor-made solutions may be costly to implement and require minimum scale
Structured FinanceStructured Finance
16
Structured Finance – Case Study IStructured Finance – Case Study IFIRA Working Capital FinancingFIRA Working Capital Financing
FIRA is a Mexican development-oriented financial institutionProvides financial services to the rural sector
Shrimp producers had limited access to working capital finance Lack of collateral
Costly and difficult to screen and monitor small producers
Price uncertainty
FIRA created a structured finance program, involving Ocean Garden (large shrimp distributor), shrimp producers, shrimp feed suppliers, and private banks
Ocean Garden signs supply agreements with individual producers and advances working capital finance
Credit rights are then transferred to a trust fund and sold to banks
17
OCEAN GARDEN
Functioning of Scheme
$100
SHRIMP PRODUCERS
BANKS
Supply Agreement
Loan for working capital $100
Transfer of credit rights
$100
FIRA
TRUST FUND
SHRIMP FEED
SUPPLIERS
Participation certificates
Payments
Feed
Structured Finance – Case Study IStructured Finance – Case Study IFIRA Working Capital FinancingFIRA Working Capital Financing
18
OCEAN GARDEN
Functioning of Scheme in Case of Default
Guarantees (49%)
SHRIMP PRODUCERS
BANKS
FIRA
Individual guarantee (9%)
Default on supply agreement
Global guarantee (up to 25% of total fund value)
TRUST FUND
SHRIMP FEED
SUPPLIERS
Individual guarantee (15%)
Second loss guarantee (46%)
Structured Finance – Case Study IStructured Finance – Case Study IFIRA Working Capital FinancingFIRA Working Capital Financing
19
Structured Finance – Case Study IStructured Finance – Case Study IFIRA Working Capital FinancingFIRA Working Capital Financing
Transaction helps to deal with information problemsOcean Garden provides know-how in screening and monitoring producers
Pooling of debt obligations allows banks to diversify their risks and avoid exposure to a specific producer
Banks do not face Ocean Garden’s credit risk (SPV is bankruptcy remote)
Pooling also reduces transaction costs
To align incentives all industry participants provide liquid guarantees to cover initial credit losses
Producer and feed suppliers provide guarantees for specific loans covering initial credit losses up to a certain levelOcean Garden provides a general guarantee covering initial credit losses up to a certain levelOnce these guarantees are exhausted investors start facing lossesFIRA provides a guarantee that covers second losses
20
Structured Finance – Case Study IIStructured Finance – Case Study IIFIRA Inventory Financing – The ProblemFIRA Inventory Financing – The Problem
Banks not willing to lend to sugar millsSugar inventories not perceived as a good collateral
Movable collateral, difficult to secure
Lack of a warehousing market to guarantee value and quality of inventories
Difficulties in repossession and liquidation in case of default
Price volatility
Strong seasonal fluctuations in sugar cane pricesLack of integrated global markets
21
Structured Finance – Case Study IIStructured Finance – Case Study IIFIRA Inventory Financing – The SolutionFIRA Inventory Financing – The Solution
Cargill grants credit to sugar mills backed by sugar inventories and then transfers credit rights to banks
Scheme has several built-in mechanisms to address problems of using sugar inventories as collateral
Cargill selects and monitors warehouses
A system of margin calls maintains a constant loan to value ratio, addressing concerns about price volatility
Loans are extended through repos, allowing easy repossession
Repo is legally a sale
22
Structured Finance – Case Study IIStructured Finance – Case Study IIFIRA Inventory Financing – The SolutionFIRA Inventory Financing – The Solution
Pooling of debt obligations allows banks to avoid exposure to a specific mill and reduces transaction costs
FIRA’s provides credit guarantees covering a large share of the total value of loans
FIRA charges a fee for its credit guarantee
Cargill guarantees the purchase of most repossessed inventories
FIRA’s risk exposure is limited by this guarantee
23
Structured Finance – Case Study IIStructured Finance – Case Study IIFIRA Inventory Financing – The SolutionFIRA Inventory Financing – The Solution
$80
CDs $100 Inventories $100
SUGAR MILL BANKS
CARGILL$80
Screening and Monitoring
Margin Calls
WAREHOUSES
Functioning of Scheme
FIRA
Funded Participation Agreement
CDs Repo
Sugar Inventories
24
Structured Finance – Case Study IIStructured Finance – Case Study IIFIRA Inventory Financing – The SolutionFIRA Inventory Financing – The Solution
SUGAR MILL
CARGILL
WAREHOUSES
Functioning of Scheme in Case of Default
Guarantee $76.8
BANKS
FIRAInventories (book value $100; market value ?)
Put option $64
Inventories (book value $100,
market value ?)
Default
Loss:$3.2
Loss:$12.8
25
FIRA plays multiple roles in structured finance transactions
Acts as a manager, setting up the structure and marketing the securities
Private firms may lack incentives to invest in developing innovative credit products
Provides credit guaranteesSince FIRA is a public institution, capital requirements on its guarantees are lower than those on private guarantees
FIRA requires banks to use its financingFIRA, as a second-tier lending institution, is evaluated on the basis of its loan disbursements
Structured Finance – Case StudyStructured Finance – Case StudyFIRA – ImplementationFIRA – Implementation
26
1. Role of the Public Sector
2. Two Cases
3. Final Thoughts
Structure of the PresentationStructure of the Presentation
27
Current policy thinking is dominated by stability concerns and efforts to converge to international standards
Misguided view that financial development equals convergence to standards
Historically, standards came late in financial development, not at the beginning
Standards based on developed country institutional environments may have unexpected effects in emerging economies
Impact of Basel and AML regulations on access to credit for SMEs
Big emerging issues: completing financial markets in small economies in the context of financial globalization
International standards are largely unrelated to new challenges faced by financial systems in emerging economies
Final ThoughtsFinal Thoughts
28
Is there a clear value added to pro-market activist interventions by the public sector?
Will the private sector do it by itself? If not, why?
If there is value added, what should be the optimal “visible hand” interventions?
Lender (1st or 2nd tier)? Risk sharer? Coordinator?
How to minimize unintended consequences of interventions?
Governments may be distracted away from the first-best solutionsGiven path dependence, second-best solutions may lead to traps that are difficult to exitGovernments may face political pressures to expand interventions and provide additional funds in the future
Need to establish clear sunset clauses
Final ThoughtsFinal Thoughts
29
Need to rethink some features of the financial institutions that promote development
• Institutions may have to start functioning more as development agencies than financial intermediaries
• Their mandate may need to be redefined in dynamic termsProvide incentives for institutions to move on to new activities once the market they were promoting becomes self-sustainable
• New products may require new methodologies for evaluating institutional performance
Evaluation based on credit volume perpetuates use of subsidized lending, even if liquidity is not a constraintEvaluation should focus on increase in financial activity generated
• Need to separate new instruments from other operationsProduct bundling reduces transparency
Final ThoughtsFinal Thoughts
30
Can idiosyncratic experiences lead to more general policy guidelines?
• What are the key features that make these interventions work?
• Can they be replicated in other sectors and other countries?
To what extent can we separate the organization (e.g., development bank) from the instrument?
Even if experiences are replicable, should the government create organizational capabilities where they do not exist?
Is there a role for pro-market interventions in the long-run?
• Are direct government interventions necessary once a good enabling environment is achieved?