Top Banner
EPI, Part 2: variants 1 Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants • Segmentation • Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo • Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE
25

Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 1Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

EPI, Part 2: variants

• Segmentation• Partial Fourier• Spin echo vs.

gradient echo• Inversion recovery• Long vs. short TE

Page 2: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 2Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Last week– Chemical shift

• Subcutaneous fat resonates at a frequency 3.5 ppm different from water

• Shift in resonant frequency results in shift in location in image

– FLASH-like images: PE direction is impervious; errors show up in read-out direction

– EPI-like images: PE direction is the bad guy

– Idle curiosity: why does myelin not show up shifted?

Page 3: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 3Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

This week

• Review– Hardware– Pulse sequence diagrams

• Read vs. phase encode

– Pulse sequences• FLASH vs. EPI

Page 4: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 4Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Fancy fenders

Hardware: everything’s a coil

Superconducting coil (“magnet”)

http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~peterj/lectures/hbm_1/sld010.htm

Gradient coils (“gradients”)

RF coil (“body coil”)

RF coil (“head coil”)

(from http://www.novamedical.com/)

Page 5: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 5Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Single-shot EPI pulse sequence

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

TE

Page 6: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 6Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Spin Echo EPI pulse sequence

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

TE/2TE/2

Page 7: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 7Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Inversion Recovery Spin Echo EPI

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

TE/2TE/2

Page 8: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 8Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Inversion Recovery FLASH

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

NPE

NRO

Page 9: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 9Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Segmented EPI pulse sequence

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

TENPE/NSEG

Page 10: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 10Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Turbo Spin Echo (turbo factor = 4)

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

TE? NPE/TF

Page 11: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 11Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

128

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC 128 128 128 128

… (32 times)

Echo spacing = 0.75ms

Pulse sequence diagram:

Flip angle = 40 degrees

Sequence type: segmented EPI

Contrast: T1 and T2*

Image resolution: 128 x 128

Segment acq. time: 32 x 0.75ms = 24 ms

Image acq. time: 1 sec

TE = 20ms (16th line)

Nrep = 4

TR = 0.25 s

Sequence type: ___________

Contrast: ___________

Image resolution: ___________

Segment acq. time:

Image acq. time: ___________

Page 12: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 12Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

K-space trajectory and scaled T2* decay in gray matter:

128 (complex-valued) points

Tacq,seg = 24msTE = 20ms

time (ms)

M

…………

128 lines

Page 13: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 13Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Image:

Page 14: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 14Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

128

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC 128 128 128

… (96 times)

Echo spacing = 0.75ms

Pulse sequence diagram:

60 deg.

Sequence type: GE EPI(partial Fourier acquisition)

Contrast: T2*

Image resolution: 128 x 128

Image acq. time: 96 x 0.75ms = 72 ms (distortion!)

TR = 1 s

TE = 30ms (32nd line)

Sequence type: ___________

Contrast: ___________

Image resolution: ___________

Image acq. time: ___________

Page 15: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 15Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

K-space trajectory and scaled T2 & T2* decay in gray matter:

128 (complex-valued) points

Tacq = 72 msTE = 30 ms

time (ms)

M

96 lines

T2*

T2

Page 16: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 16Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Image:

GE EPI, long TE and read-out GE EPI, shorter TE and read-out

Page 17: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 17Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

128

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC 128 128 128

… (96 times)

Echo spacing = 0.75ms

Pulse sequence diagram:

90 deg.

Sequence type: SE EPI(partial Fourier acquisition)

Contrast: T2

Image resolution: 128 x 128

Image acq. time: 96 x 0.75ms = 72 ms

TR = 5 s

TE = 60ms (32nd line)

180 deg.

Sequence type: ___________

Contrast: ___________

Image resolution: ___________

Image acq. time: ___________

Page 18: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 18Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

K-space trajectory and scaled T2 & T2* decay in gray matter:

128 (complex-valued) points

Tacq = 72 msTE = 60 ms

time (ms)

M

96 lines

18090

T2*

T2

Page 19: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 19Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Image:SE, more superior

GE

SE, more inferior

Page 20: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 20Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

Echo spacing = 0.75ms

Pulse sequence diagram:

90 deg.

Sequence type: IR SE EPI (4-shot)Contrast: T1 and (some) T2

Image resolution: 128 x 128

Image acq. time: 4 x 2.5s = 10 s

TE = 25ms (16th line)

180 Nrep = 4

TR = 2.5 sTI = 0.9 s

180

Sequence type: ___________

Contrast: ______________________

Image resolution: ___________

Image acq. time: ___________

(32 times)

Page 21: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 21Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

K-space trajectory and scaled T2* decay in gray matter:

128 (complex-valued) points

…………

128 lines

Tacq,seg = 24msTE = 40ms

time (ms)

M

18090

T2*

T2, white matter

T2, gray matter

Page 22: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 22Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Image:

Page 23: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 23Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Pulse sequence diagram:

Nrep = 176 x 224

256 points

RF

GSS

GPE

GRO

DAC

Sequence type: 3D FLASH(slab-selective excitation)

Contrast: T1

Image resolution: 256 x 224 x 176

Image acq. time: 176 x 224 x .01s = 6 min 34s

Sequence type: ___________

Contrast: ______________________

Image resolution: ___________

Image acq. time: ___________

TR = 10ms

Page 24: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 24Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

K-space trajectory and scaled T2* decay in gray matter:

256 (complex-valued) points

Tacq = 2.5msTE = 5ms

time (ms)

M

224 lines

176 partitions

Page 25: Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 EPI, Part 2: variants1 Segmentation Partial Fourier Spin echo vs. gradient echo Inversion recovery Long vs. short TE.

EPI, Part 2: variants 25Psy 8960, Fall ‘06

Image: