Provisional Population Totals, Paper 1 of 2011, Karnataka

7/31/2019 Provisional Population Totals, Paper 1 of 2011, Karnataka

1/122

ProvisionalPopulation

TotalsPaper 1 of 2011

CENSUS OF INDIA2011

Karnataka

T.K. ANIL KUMAR

of the Indian Administrative Service

Director of Census Operations

Karnataka

Series 30


2/122

(C) Government of India Copyright 2011

DesignNational Institute of Design, Ahmedabad

Printed at

Government Central PressDirectorate of Printing, Stationery & PublicationsGovernment of Karnataka

Published byDirectorate of Census Operations, KarnatakaBangalore

Data Product No. : 29-001-2011-Cen-Book (E)

Price: (Inland): `235/- (Foreign) 3.17 $ 5.31

Census websitewww.censuskarnataka.gov.inemail: [email protected]


3/122

GRATEFULLY DEDICATED TO THE PERSON

ENUMERATED AND THE ENUMERATOR


4/122


5/122

PROVISIONAL POPULATION TOTALS 5

CONTENTS

Page No.

Figures at a glance India 7

Figures at a glance Karnataka 10

Chapter 1 Introductory note 13

Chapter 2 A prelude to analysis 33

Chapter 3 Size, growth rate and distribution o population 39

Chapter 4 Density o population 63

Chapter 5 Gender composition o population 69

Chapter 6 State o literacy 85

Maps

1) Position o Karnataka in India, 2011 9

2) Karnataka Administrative divisions, 2011 113) Karnataka Changes in administrative boundaries, 2001-2011 37

4) Karnataka Percentage decadal population growth, 2001-2011 55

5) Karnataka Density o population, 2011 67

6) Karnataka Sex ratio, 2011 80

7) Karnataka Literacy rate or persons and emales, 2011 88

Charts

1) India Comparative size o population o States/Us, 2011 42

2) Karnataka Population and net decadal accretion, 1901-2011 44

3) Karnataka Comparative size o population o Districts, 2011 47

4) Karnataka Comparative size o percentage o population andarea o the Districts, 2011 48

5) Karnataka Percentage decadal population growth, 1901-2011 56

6) Karnataka Sex ratio, 1901-2011 72

7) Karnataka rends in sex ratio 1901-2011 73

8) Karnataka Proportion o emale population in the Districts, 2011 82

9) Karnataka Literacy rates o the Districts, 2011 98


6/122

6

Annexures

able 1 Distribution o population, decadal growth rate, sex ratioand population density or State and Districts: 2011 100

able 2 Percentage decadal variation in population or State and

Districts: 1901-2011 102able 3 Sex ratio or State and Districts: 1901-2011 104

able 4 Population in the age-group 0-6, number o literates andliteracy rate by sex or State and Districts: 2011 106

able 5 Literacy rates by sex or State and District: 2001 and 2011 108

able 6 Proportion o child population in the age-group by sex 0-6: 2001 and 2011 109

Census in pictures 111

GIS enumeration block map 117GIS ward map 118

Specimen o Houselisting and Housing Census Schedule 119

Specimen o Household Schedule 121


7/122

POPULATION 1 Persons 1,21,01,93,422

Males 62,37,24,248

Females 58,64,69,174

DECADAL

POPULATION GROWTH 2001-2011

Absolute Percentage

Persons 18,14,55,986 17.64

Males 9,15,01,158 17.19

Females 8,99,54,828 18.12

DENSITY OF POPULATION 2(per sq. km.)

382

SEX RATIO(females per 1000 males)

940

POPULATION IN

THE AGE GROUP 0-61

Absolute Percentage to

totalpopulation

Persons 15,87,89,287 13.12

Males 8,29,52,135 13.30

Females 7,58,37,152 12.93

LITERATES 1 Absolute Literacy rate

Persons 77,84,54,120 74.04

Males 44,42,03,762 82.14

Females 33,42,50,358 65.46

Notes: please see notes overleaf.

ProvisionalPopulationTotals

CENSUS OF INDIA2011

FIGURES AT A GLANCEINDIA


8/122


9/122


10/122

POPULATION Persons 6,11,30,704

Males 3,10,57,742

Females 3,00,72,962

DECADAL

POPULATION GROWTH 2001-2011 Absolute Percentage

Persons 82,80,142 15.67

Males 41,58,824 15.46Females 41,21,318 15.88

DENSITY OF POPULATION(per sq. km.)

319

SEX RATIO(females per 1000 males)

968

POPULATION INTHE AGE GROUP 0-6

Absolute Percentage tototal

population

Persons 68,55,801 11.21

Males 35,27,844 11.36

Females 33,27,957 11.07

LITERATES Absolute Literacy rate

Persons 4,10,29,323 75.60

Males 2,28,08,468 82.85

Females 1,82,20,855 68.13

FIGURES AT A GLANCEKARNATAKA

ProvisionalPopulationTotals

CENSUS OF INDIA2011


11/122


MAP 2


12/122


13/122

1INTRODUCTORY NOTE


14/122


15/122


16/122


17/122


18/122


19/122


20/122


21/122


22/122

22

this objective o enlisting the co-operation o all sections o societyas well as to gain confdence amongthe general public that inormationprovided will be kept confdentialas required under the law, a strategywas planned and executed with theelectronic and print media.

Census 2011 witnessed the use oa Mascot a lady enumerator. Tiswas done in order to encourage andacknowledge the services o the realprotagonists o the Census, namelythe enumerators.

During Houselisting operations,

held between April and May 2010,the pitch o the publicity campaignwas kept at a moderate level. For the Population Enumeration phase held rom 9th to 28th February 2011the publicity campaign was on a massive scale and aimed to enhance awareness about this gigantic exerciseo national importance seeking co-operation o the people or its success. Special eorts were made to

sensitize target groups such as women,children, workers and the disabled. Apartrom this, attention was also ocusedon accurately capturing emale workparticipation which is very oen subjectto omission. In addition to the publicity

measures undertaken at the central level,this Directorate also made all signifcanteorts to reach all sections o the society inthe State by utilising the local mass media.V channels, All India Radio, FM radiochannels, cable networks, news papers,public transport vehicles, auto rickshaws,rail and bus stations, hoardings in publicplaces, public announcements, etc., were

extensively used to propagate Census

messages. V and Radio spots,advertisement in the news papers,messages rom the dignitaries andcelebrities, panel discussions in Vchannels and All India Radio werelaunched. Te State governmentPublic Sector Undertakings werealso roped in to sponsor some othe publicity activities undertakenby this Directorate. Te Stategovernment departments issued

circulars which ensured that thepublicity materials were displayedprominently at all Panchayt Raj

Publicity Poster in Kannada or Population Enumeration

Population Enumeration Publicity hoarding on a Bus Shelter in BBMP

His Excellency the Governor o Karnataka and Honble Chie Minister o Karnatakalaunching the publicity campaign or Population Enumeration by releasing Census

balloon during the Republic Day Parade on 26.01.2011


23/122


24/122

24

District/aluk Level Census Coordination Committee: Headed by theDeputy Commissioners o concerneddistricts and ahsildars o the concernedtaluks respectively, the District/alukLevel Census Co-ordination Committeeswere constituted to monitor the Censusoperations in their districts/taluks.

Conerence o Principal CensusO cers: Te frst State level conerencewas held on 6th February 2010 orPrincipal Census O cers. Hon`bleMinister or Home, Government oKarnataka, Dr V.S.Acharya inauguratedthe conerence and Sri.G.KarunakaraReddy, Honble Minister or Revenue,

Government o Karnataka,presided over the conerence. Tekey note address was deliveredby Dr.C.Chandramouli, RegistrarGeneral and Census Commissioner,India. Director o Census Operations,Karnataka, imparted training to thePrincipal and Additional PrincipalCensus O cers. Tis conerencekicked o the fled operations o the

Census 2011 in the State.

Video Conerencing: Te KarnatakaState Wide Area Network (KSWAN)was put to good use during the Censusoperations in the State. Monthlymeetings chaired by the State NodalO cer were conducted which helped

in monitoring the feld operations.rainings were also conducted using

this medium to Charge o cers. TeVillage and own Directory rainingwas done using the EDUSA networkwhich helped in ensuring uniormtraining to the aluk level o cialsacross the State.

Conerence o District Census

O cers and Additional DistrictCensus O cers: wo trainingprogrammes were organised

or District Census O cers andAdditional District Census O cers inBangalore.

Inauguration o First State Level Conerence o Principle Census Ofcers Lighting o Lamp by Honble Minister or Revenue, Govt. o Karnataka

Dr. C. Chandramouli, Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, anked bySri K.S.Prabhakara, State Nodal Ofcer and Sri T.K. Anil Kumar, Director o Census

Operations, Karnataka monitoring the Population Enumeration work in Karnatakathrough Video Conerence o Principal Census Ofcers

Training Conerence o District and Additional District Census Ofcers in Bangalore


25/122


26/122

Introductory note


27/122


Census 2001 Code Census 2011 Code

Drinking Water Source Main Source of Drinking Water

Tap 1 Tap water from treated source 1

Handpump 2 Tap water from untreated source 2

Tubewell 3 Covered well 3

Well 4 Un-covered well 4

Tank/pond/lake 5 Hand pump 5

River/canal 6 Tube well/borehole 6

Spring 7 Spring 7

Any Other 8 River/canal 8

Tank/pond/lake 9

Other Sources 0

(iv) Source o Lighting: Te heading has been modifed as Main Source o Lighting

(v) Bathing acility within premises: Realising that bathroom within the house was a predominantlyurban phenomenon, the heading has been changed as bathing acility within the premises. Moreover,the categories have been expanded to include Enclosure without roo . Te code list or the Census2011 along with codes as were in Census 2001 are given below:


Bathroom within the house Bathing facility available within premises

Yes 1 Bathroom 1

No 2 Enclosure withoutroof

2

No 3

(vi) Latrine: In Census 2001, inormation was sought on the availability o latrine within the house; inCensus 2011 it has been modifed as available Within the premises. Attempt has also been madeto include other types o latrines. Tese categories are more in keeping with the WHO/UNICEFcategories. Te set o codes as used in Census 2011 and the corresponding Census 2001 Codes are asollows:


No Latrine 0 F lush/pour flush la tr ine connected to

Service Latrine 1 Piped sewer system 1

Pit Latrine 2 Septic system 2

Water Closet 3 Other system 3

Pit Latrine

With slab/Ventilated Improved Pit 4

Without slab/open pit 5

Night soil disposed into open drain 6

Service Latrine

Night soi l removed by human 7

Night soil serviced by animals 8

No latrine within premises

Public Latrine 9

Open 0


28/122

28

(vii) Computer: Tis is a new question. Computer and internet penetration in the country is still a mattero conjecture as there are no authentic sources or this data. Te Census 2011 would give rich data onthis, which would be a vital input or policy planning. Te codes or the new question in Census 2011are as ollows:

Census 2011 Code

Computer/Laptop possessedYes

With Internet 1

Without Internet 2

No 3

(viii) elephone: Te scope o the question on elephone has been expanded to separately include MobilePhone also. With the rapid expansion o Mobile Phone coverage, traditional land line telephones havebecome less attractive. Te present Census would give rich data on this aspect. Te codes in Census2011 are as ollows:

Census 2001 Code Census 2011 CodeTelephone Telephone/Mobile phone

Yes 1 Yes

Landline only 1

Mobile only 2

No 2 Both 3

No 4

POPULAION ENUMERAION

Te new eatures in Household Schedule o the Population Enumeration Census 2011 as compared to theprevious Census are as ollows:

a) Preprinting o Location particulars up to District: A highlight o Census 2011 was the pre-printingo location codes up to District level and the use o shorter Location Codes in the feld. Tis reduced theburden on the Enumerators to an extent and improved compliance in the writing o location Codes onevery Schedule.

b) Printing o Bar Codes/ Form Number: Te introduction o unique Form Number and Bar Codesin each Schedule was a new eature. Tis acilitated proper inventory management and tracking oSchedules.

c) Colour DropOut: Te colours chosen or printing the Schedule were such that they dropped outtotally aer scanning. Tis is designed to acilitate considerable improvement in Intelligent CharacterRecognition (ICR).

d) Edge Cut: Cutting one edge in the Schedule is designed to acilitate proper alignment o Schedulesduring scanning.

e) Linking o Houselisting with Population Enumeration: A procedure to link the Housing Census datao matched households to the Population Enumeration data has been attempted or the frst time.

) racking system in case o more than one orm is used: A provision to record the number o thecontinuation orms used in the case o normal/Institutional households where more than one Schedulehas been used has been made.

g) Description o Institutional Households: A provision has been made or recording the descriptiono Institutional households.


29/122


30/122


31/122


32/122


33/122

2A PRELUDE TO ANALYSIS


34/122


35/122


2A prelude to analysis

Te Indian Census has a long tradition o releasing the population data on a provisional basis within a shorttime aer the completion o the Population Enumeration. Te Provisional Population otals are compiledby each enumerator directly rom the page totals o a ew data items o each page o the Household Schedule,which are then consolidated at the enumerators block level. Te totals o various administrative levels atthe taluk, town, the district and the State are consolidated through a process o successive aggregation. Teentire exercise o aggregation right rom the enumerators block level to the State level is completed withina short span.

Te data items on which the provisional totals are collected and compiled or each sex are Population,Child Population in the age group 0-6, and Literate Population. Te actual processing and fnal tabulationo this volume o data takes time, thereore, provisional data relating to some key aspects o the populationbecomes extremely useul to the data users. In the present publication, the frst in the series o publicationso Census o India 2011, the ollowing tables are included:-

Table Contents

Provisional

Population

Total Table 1

Distribution of Population, Decadal

Growth Rate, Sex Ratio and Population

Density for State and Districts: 2011

Provisional

Population

Total Table 2

Percentage Decadal Variation in Popula-

tion for State and Districts: 1901-2011

Provisional

Population

Total Table 3

Sex Ratio for State and Districts: 1901-

2011

Provisional

Population

Total Table 4

Population in the Age-group 0-6,

Number of Literates and Literacy Rate

by Sex for State and Districts: 2011

Provisional

Population

Total Table 5

Literacy Rates by Sex for State and

District : 2001 and 2011

Provisional

Population

Total Table 6

Proportion of Child Population in the

Age-group by Sex 0-6: 2001 and 2011

Te data presented in these tables have been briey analyzed. Te analysis is supported by maps/diagrams,which highlight certain basic eatures o the population statistics presented in the tables.


36/122

36

Te districtwise tables and statements presented in this publication are arranged in ascending order o theLocation Code Numbers given to dierent districts at the Census o India, 2011. Statement showing list odistricts arranged as per their present Location Code Numbers is given below:

Name of the District Location Code NumberBelgaum 01

Bagalkot 02

Bijapur 03

Bidar 04

Raichur 05

Koppal 06

Gadag 07

Dharwad 08

Uttara Kannada 09

Haveri 10

Bellary 11

Chitradurga 12

Davanagere 13

Shimoga 14Udupi 15

Chikmagalur 16

Tumkur 17

Bangalore 18

Mandya 19

Hassan 20

Dakshina Kannada 21

Kodagu 22

Mysore 23

Chamarajanagar 24

Gulbarga 25

Yadgir 26Kolar 27

Chikkaballapura 28

Bangalore Rural 29

Ramanagara 30

Tere have been a ew jurisdictional changes in the boundaries o the districts aer 2001 Census due to thecreation o three new districts. Te boundaries o the ollowing three districts and change in the number otaluks in these districts are given below:-

Sl. No. District Number of Taluks Reasons for thedifference

2001 20111 Bangalore Rural 8 4 Four taluks t ransferred to newly c reated Ramanagara di st ric t

2 Kolar 11 5 Six taluks transferred to newly created Chikkaballapura district

3 Gulbarga 10 7 Three taluks transferred to newly created Yadgir District

It will be important or the data users to bear in mind that the frst ush o Census results, Te ProvisionalPopulation otals, is rather raw data and not subjected to the intensive checks and cross checks as in the caseo usual Census data. Further, the numbers given are somewhat tentative and the fnal fgures are bound tobe dierent. Tereore, some caution is necessary while interpreting the results. Te intelligent data userwill have these limitations at the back o his mind but, still use the data to pick up some early demographictrends.

Note: For Census 2011, the population o Others has been clubbed with the Males or working out

population, 0-6 population, literates and related rates and ratios.

A prelude to analysis

MAP 3


37/122


MAP 3


38/122


39/122

3SIZE, GROWTH RATE ANDDISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION


40/122

3


41/122


3Size, growth rate and

distribution of populationAs per the provisional results compiled or the Census o India 2011, the population o India at 00.00 hourso 1st March 2011 stood at 1,21,01,93,422 comprising o 62,37,24,248 males and 58,64,69,174 emales.Statement - 1 given below shows the distribution o population among the States and Union erritories andtheir percentage share o population. Te distribution o population is graphically presented in Chart - 1.

STATEMENT - 1POPULATION OF STATES/UTs BY SEX AND PERCENTAGE SHARE OF POPULATION IN TOTAL POPULATION

State/ UT

Code

India/State/Union

Territory #

Total population Percentage share in total

populationPersons Males Females- INDIA 1,21,01,93,422 62,37,24,248 58,64,69,174 100

01 Jammu & Kashmir 1,25,48,926 66,65,561 58,83,365 1.04

02 Himachal Pradesh 68,56,509 34,73,892 33,82,617 0.57

03 Punjab 2,77,04,236 1,46,34,819 1,30,69,417 2.29

04 Chandigarh # 10,54,686 5,80,282 4,74,404 0.09

05 Uttarakhand 1,01,16,752 51,54,178 49,62,574 0.84

06 Haryana 2,53,53,081 1,35,05,130 1,18,47,951 2.09

07 NCT of Delhi # 1,67,53,235 89,76,410 77,76,825 1.38

08 Rajasthan 6,86,21,012 3,56,20,086 3,30,00,926 5.67

09 Uttar Pradesh 19,95,81,477 10,45,96,415 9,49,85,062 16.49

10 Bihar 10,38,04,637 5,41,85,347 4,96,19,290 8.58

11 Sikkim 6,07,688 3,21,661 2,86,027 0.05

12 Arunachal Pradesh 13,82,611 7,20,232 6,62,379 0.11

13 Nagaland 19,80,602 10,25,707 9,54,895 0.16

14 Manipur 27,21,756 13,69,764 13,51,992 0.22

15 Mizoram 10,91,014 5,52,339 5,38,675 0.09

16 Tripura 36,71,032 18,71,867 17,99,165 0.30

17 Meghalaya 29,64,007 14,92,668 14,71,339 0.24

18 Assam 3,11,69,272 1,59,54,927 1,52,14,345 2.58

19 West Bengal 9,13,47,736 4,69,27,389 4,44,20,347 7.55

20 Jharkhand 3,29,66,238 1,69,31,688 1,60,34,550 2.72

21 Orissa 4,19,47,358 2,12,01,678 2,07,45,680 3.47

22 Chhattisgarh 2,55,40,196 1,28,27,915 1,27,12,281 2.11

23 Madhya Pradesh 7,25,97,565 3,76,12,920 3,49,84,645 6.00

24 Gujarat 6,03,83,628 3,14,82,282 2,89,01,346 4.99

25 Daman & Diu # 2,42,911 1,50,100 92,811 0.02

26 Dadra & Nagar Haveli # 3,42,853 1,93,178 1,49,675 0.03

27 Maharashtra 11,23,72,972 5,83,61,397 5,40,11,575 9.29

28 Andhra Pradesh 8,46,65,533 4,25,09,881 4,21,55,652 7.00

29 Karnataka 6,11,30,704 3,10,57,742 3,00,72,962 5.05

30 Goa 14,57,723 7,40,711 7,17,012 0.12

31 Lakshadweep # 64,429 33,106 31,323 0.01

32 Kerala 3,33,87,677 1,60,21,290 1,73,66,387 2.76

33 Tamil Nadu 7,21,38,958 3,61,58,871 3,59,80,087 5.96

34 Puducherry # 12,44,464 6,10,485 6,33,979 0.10

35 Andaman& Nicobar Islands #

379,944 2,02,330 1,77,614 0.03

CHART 1


42/122

42

Uttar

Pradesh

Maharas

htra

Bihar

WestBengal

Andhra

Pradesh

Tamil

Nadu

Ma

dh

ya

Prad

esh

Rajasth

anKar

nataka

Gujarat

Orissa

Kerala

Jharkhand

Assam

Punja

b

Chhatisgarh

2 55 40 196 2.11 %

Haryana

2 53 53 081 2.09%

* NCT of Delhi

1 67 53 235 1.38 %

Jammu & Kashmir

1 25 48 926 1.04 %

Others

3 61 78 981 2.98 %

INDIA1 21 01 93 422

INDIA

COMPARATIVE SIZE OF POPULATIONOF STATES/ UTS* 2011

Others

UttarakhandHimachal PradeshTripuraMeghalaya

ManipurNagalandGoa

Arunachal Pradesh* Puducherry* ChandigarhMizoramSikkim* Dadra & Nagar Haveli

* Andaman & Nicobar Islands

* Daman & Diu* Lakshadweep

3 61 78 981

1 01 16 75268 56 50936 71 03229 64 007

27 21 75619 80 60214 57 72313 82 61112 44 46410 54 68610 91 0146 07 6883 42 853

3 79 944

2 42 91164 429

2.98 %

0.84 %0.57 %

0.30 %0.24 %0.22 %0.16 %0.12 %0.11 %0.10 %0.09 %0.09 %

0.05 %0.03 %0.03 %

0.02 %0.01 %

913

4773

6

7.55

%

112372972

9.29%

1038

04637

8.58

%

19958147716.49%

846655

33

7.00%

725 97565

6.00%

721389585.96%

68621012

5.67%

61130704

5.05%

60383628

4.99%

419473583.47%

333876772.76%

329662382.72%

31169272

2.58%

27704236

2.29%

UTS * - Union Territories


43/122

CHART 2


44/122

44

KARNATAKA

PO

PULATIONANDNETDECADALACCRETION1901-2011

INCRORES

FIGURESONTOPOFTHEBARSREPRESEN

TS

TOTALPOPULATIONFOREACHCENSUSYEAR.

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-

1

CENSUSYEARS

13054754

6

1130704

52850562

44977201

37

135714

29299014

23586772

135252511

3

3775991

4632992

16255368

19401956

1901

1911

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

1921

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

47

0

497

-14

7

652

125

5

393

162

2

376

314

6

588

418

4

816

571

2

242

783

6

700

784

1

487

787

3

361

828

0

142

NETACCRETION

NETDEDUCTION

Size, growth rate and distribution of population

Statement - 3 shows the population o the districts and their percentage share in the population o the State.Te percentage share o population among the districts is graphically depicted in Chart 3


45/122


Te percentage share o population among the districts is graphically depicted in Chart - 3.

STATEMENT - 3POPULATION OF DISTRICTS BY SEX AND PERCENTAGE SHARE OF POPULATION IN TOTAL POPULATION

District

Code

State / District Total population Percentage share in

total populationPersons Males Females

- Karnataka 6,11,30,704 3,10,57,742 3,00,72,962 100

01 Belgaum 47,78,439 24,27,104 23,51,335 7.82

02 Bagalkot 18,90,826 9,52,902 9,37,924 3.09

03 Bijapur 21,75,102 11,12,953 10,62,149 3.56

04 Bidar 17,00,018 8,70,850 8,29,168 2.78

05 Raichur 19,24,773 9,66,493 9,58,280 3.15

06 Koppal 13,91,292 7,01,479 6,89,813 2.28

07 Gadag 10,65,235 5,38,477 5,26,758 1.7408 Dharwad 18,46,993 9,39,127 9,07,866 3.02

09 Uttara Kannada 14,36,847 7,27,424 7,09,423 2.35

10 Haveri 15,98,506 8,19,295 7,79,211 2.61

11 Bellary 25,32,383 12,80,402 12,51,981 4.14

12 Chitradurga 16,60,378 8,43,411 8,16,967 2.72

13 Davanagere 19,46,905 9,89,602 9,57,303 3.18

14 Shimoga 17,55,512 8,79,817 8,75,695 2.87

15 Udupi 11,77,908 5,62,896 6,15,012 1.93

16 Chikmagalur 11,37,753 5,67,483 5,70,270 1.86

17 Tumkur 26,81,449 13,54,770 13,26,679 4.39

18 Bangalore 95,88,910 50,25,498 45,63,412 15.69

19 Mandya 18,08,680 9,09,441 8,99,239 2.96

20 Hassan 17,76,221 8,85,807 8,90,414 2.91

21 Dakshina Kannada 20,83,625 10,32,577 10,51,048 3.41

22 Kodagu 5,54,762 2,74,725 2,80,037 0.91

23 Mysore 29,94,744 15,11,206 14,83,538 4.90

24 Chamarajanagar 10,20,962 5,13,359 5,07,603 1.67

25 Gulbarga 25,64,892 13,07,061 12,57,831 4.20

26 Yadgir 11,72,985 5,91,104 5,81,881 1.92

27 Kolar 15,40,231 7,79,401 7,60,830 2.52

28 Chikkaballapura 12,54,377 6,37,504 6,16,873 2.05

29 Bangalore Rural 9,87,257 5,07,514 4,79,743 1.61

30 Ramanagara 10,82,739 5,48,060 5,34,679 1.77

It can be seen rom Statement-3 that Bangalore district, home to the State head-quarters, with its shareo 15.69 percent population is the most populous district in the State. In other words, or every 6 personin the State one belongs to Bangalore district. Belgaum with a share o 7.82 percent occupies the second

place, ollowed by Mysore (4.90), umkur (4.39), Gulbarga (4.20) and Bellary (4.14) districts. All these 5districts have more than 2 5 million population each and together contribute one ourth to the States total


46/122

46

districts have more than 2.5 million population each and together contribute one ourth to the State s totalpopulation. Among these fve districts, 4 districts have Municipal Corporations within their jurisdiction,which is a actor or them to have more population. Kodagu with a population o just 0.55 million is theleast populous district in the State, preceded by Banglore Rural district with 0.98 million. Except or thesetwo districts in the State, all other districts have more than 1 million population. Te comparative size o

population and area o the districts, 2011in terms o percentage is depicted in Chart-4.In terms o ranking, Bangalore district with a share o 15.69 percent ranks frst, ollowed by Belgaumdistrict (7.82 percent), Kodagu district with 0.91 percent share occupies the last rank preceded by BangaloreRural district (1.61 percent). In the statement - 4 given below, it can be seen that 14 districts have retainedthe same ranks as in 2001 Census. It is interesting to note that inspite o increase in the total populationo Bangalore Rural district during the decade 2001-11, the percentage share o its population to the totalpopulation o the State remains identical at 1.61 percent or both the decades.

Census publicity hoarding at IOCL petrol bunk, Bangalore.

Enumeration of Honble Chief Justice, High Court of Karnataka


CHART 3


47/122


CHART 4


48/122

48

KA

RNATAKA

COMPARATIVESIZEOFPERCENTAGEO

FPOPULATIONANDAR

EAOFTHEDISTRICTS

2011

INPERCENT

FIGURESONTOPOFTHEBARSREPRESENT

STOTAL

POPULATIONANDAREAINSQ.KM.FOREA

CHDISTRICT.

4778439

13415

1890826

6575

2175102

10494

1700018

5448

1924773

8441

1436847

10291

1846993

4260

1598506

4823

8450

1660378

8440

1137753

1755512

8477

1391292

5575

4656

1946905

5924

1177908

3880

2681449

10597

1065235

2532383

7201

2190

554762

4102

2083625

4560

1776221

6814

2994744

6854

1020962

5101

1808680

4961

2564892

10989

1172985

5235

1540231

4013

4210

1082739

3576

987257

2239

1254377

9588910

BELGAUM

BAGALKOT

BIJAPUR

BIDAR

RAICHUR

KOPPAL

GADAG

DHARWAD

UTTARAKANNADA

HAVERI

BELLARY

CHITRADURGA

DAVANAGERE

SHIMOGA

UDUPI

CHIKMAGALUR

TUMKUR

BANGALORE

MANDYA

HASSAN

DAKSHINAKANNADA

KODAGU

MYSORE

CHAMARAJANAGAR

GULBARGA

YADGIR

KOLAR

CHIKKABALLAPURA

BANGALORERURAL

RAMANAGARA

16

14

12

10 8 6 4 2 0

POPU

LATION

AREA


STATEMENT - 4RANKING OF DISTRICTS BY POPULATION SIZE :


49/122


2001 AND 2011

Rank In 2011 State/ Districts Population 2011 Percent to total Populationof District

Rank in 2001

2011 2001

- Karnataka 6,11,30,704 100.00 100.00 -1 Bangalore 95,88,910 15.69 12.37 1

2 Belgaum 47,78,439 7.82 7.97 2

3 Mysore 29,94,744 4.90 5.00 3

4 Tumkur 26,81,449 4.39 4.89 4

5 Gulbarga 25,64,892 4.20 4.11 5

6 Bellary 25,32,383 4.14 3.84 6

7 Bijapur 21,75,102 3.56 3.42 8

8 Dakshina Kannada 20,83,625 3.41 3.59 7

9 Davanagere 19,46,905 3.18 3.39 9

10 Raichur 19,24,773 3.15 3.16 12

11 Bagalkot 18,90,826 3.09 3.13 13

12 Dharwad 18,46,993 3.02 3.04 15

13 Mandya 18,08,680 2.96 3.34 10

14 Hassan 17,76,221 2.91 3.26 11

15 Shimoga 17,55,512 2.87 3.11 14

16 Bidar 17,00,018 2.78 2.84 17

17 Chitradurga 16,60,378 2.72 2.87 16

18 Haveri 15,98,506 2.61 2.72 18

19 Kolar 15,40,231 2.52 2.62 19

20 Uttara Kannada 14,36,847 2.35 2.56 2021 Koppal 13,91,292 2.28 2.26 21

22 Chikkaballapura 12,54,377 2.05 2.17 22

23 Udupi 11,77,908 1.93 2.10 24

24 Yadgir 11,72,985 1.92 1.81 28

25 Chikmagalur 11,37,753 1.86 2.16 23

26 Ramanagara 10,82,739 1.77 1.95 25

27 Gadag 10,65,235 1.74 1.84 26

28 Chamarajanagar 10,20,962 1.67 1.83 27

29 Bangalore Rural 9,87,257 1.61 1.61 29

30 Kodagu 5,54,762 0.91 1.04 30

able - 2 given in the Annexure shows the percentage decadal growth rate o each district since 1901. Tedecadal growth rates, 2001 - 2011 or the districts are depicted in Map - 4.

Statement - 5 shows the selected indicators o population growth in dierent districts o the State. Te percentagedecadal growth o population in districts 1901-2011 is depicted in Chart - 5. Te percentage decadal growth opopulation in the inter-censal period 2001 -2011 varied rom a negative rate o -0.28 percent in Chikmagalurdistrict to the highest o 46.68 percent in Bangalore district. Te average decadal growth rate or the Statestands at 15.67. Tere are seven districts including Bangalore, which have registered growth rate above the Stateaverage, whereas in the remaining 23 districts the decadal population growth rate is below the State average

o 15.67. Among these 23 districts, apart rom Chikmagalur district which has a negative decadal growth, 14districts have registered below 10 percent decadal growth, with Kodagu recording the least o 1.13 percent.


50/122


Statement - 6 presents the distribution o the districts by ranges o percentage decadal growth and percentageo population o these districts. It clearly brings out the major shi in distribution o districts by ranges o

th t b t 1991 2001 d 2001 2011


51/122


growth rates between 1991-2001 and 2001-2011.

STATEMENT - 6DISTRIBUTION OF DISTRICTS BY RANGE OF PERCENTAGEDECADAL GROWTH: 1991-2001 AND 2001-2011

Percent-age

decadalgrowth

Number ofDistricts

1991-2001

Percentage ofpopulation tototal popula-

tion 2001

Number ofDistricts

2001-2011

Percentage ofpopulation tototal popula-

tion 2011


52/122

52

CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL GROWTH OF STATE 1991-2001 AND 2001-2011

DistrictCode

States / Distrticts Decadal growth of population(Absolute)

Percentage contribution tototal growth of the state

1991-2001 2001-2011 1991-2001 2001-2011

- Karnataka 78,73,361 82,80,142 100 100

01 Belgaum 6,30,899 5,63,934 8.01 6.81

02 Bagalkot 2,61,633 2,38,934 3.32 2.89

03 Bijapur 2,69,187 3,68,184 3.42 4.45

04 Bidar 2,46,574 1,97,645 3.13 2.39

05 Raichur 3,17,953 2,55,011 4.04 3.08

06 Koppal 2,38,011 1,95,203 3.02 2.36

07 Gadag 1,12,793 93,400 1.43 1.13

08 Dharwad 2,29,358 2,42,740 2.91 2.93

09 Uttara Kannada 1,33,384 83,203 1.69 1.00

10 Haveri 1,69,903 1,59,390 2.16 1.92

11 Bellary 3,71,140 5,05,243 4.71 6.10

12 Chitradurga 2,05,179 1,42,482 2.61 1.72

13 Davanagere 2,31,730 1,55,953 2.94 1.88

14 Shimoga 1,90,286 1,12,967 2.42 1.36

15 Udupi 74,144 65,665 0.94 0.79

16 Chikmagalur 1,23,622 -3,152 1.57 -0.04

17 Tumkur 2,78,892 96,738 3.54 1.17

18 Bangalore 16,97,962 30,51,786 21.57 36.86

19 Mandya 1,19,331 44,975 1.52 0.54

20 Hassan 1,51,985 54,552 1.93 0.66

21 Dakshina Kannada 2,41,565 1,85,895 3.07 2.25

22 Kodagu 60,106 6,201 0.76 0.07

23 Mysore 3,59,374 3,53,717 4.56 4.27

24 Chamarajanagar 82,097 55,500 1.04 0.67

25 Gulbarga 3,88,604 3,90,150 4.94 4.71

26 Yadgir 1,60,149 2,16,805 2.03 2.62

27 Kolar 1,75,204 1,53,169 2.23 1.85

28 Chikkaballapura 1,43,976 1,05,370 1.83 1.27

29 Bangalore Rural 1,33,443 1,36,289 1.69 1.65

30 Ramanagara 74,877 52,193 0.95 0.63

Statement - 8 presents the absolute increase in population o the districts o the State during the Censusdecade 1991-2001 and 2001-2011. Te percentage contributions o each o the districts to the total growth othe State or the decades 1991-2001 and 2001-2011 have also been shown in Statement - 8. Although, in theState as a whole there has been an increase in net accretion in the population during 2001-2011 as compared

to 1991-2001, as many as 23 districts have shown a reverse trend in this respect. Te district o Bangalore hascontributed 36.86 percent to the total growth o the State in the decade 2001-2011.


53/122

by 2.38 percentage points. Among the disticts the highest proportion o child population (0-6) is ound inYadgir district (15.83 percent) which incidentally had the highest proportion o child population (0-6) in2001 also. Te least proportion o child population (0-6) is recorded in Udupi district (8.54 percent) which


54/122

54

p p p p ( ) p ( p )also had the lowest proportion in 2001 Census. Te proportion o child population (0-6) is above the Stateaverage o 11.21 percent in only 12 districts o the State.

STATEMENT - 10

DISTRIBUTION OF DISTRICTS BY THEIR RANGES OF THE PROPORTIONOF CHILD POPULATION IN THE AGE GROUP 0-6 FOR 2001 AND 2011

Range of pro-portion of childpopulation in theage group 0-6

Number ofDistricts 2001

Percentage ofpopulation tototal population2001 (all ages)

Number ofDistricts 2011

Percentage ofPopulation tototal population2011 (all ages)

Less than 9.00 0 0 4 9.65

9.00-11.99 7 29.74 17 57.42

12.00-13.99 12 33.16 7 27.86

14.00-15.99 5 19.79 2 5.07

16.00-17.99 5 15.51 0 0

18.00 and above 1 1.81 0 0

Te distribution o districts by their ranges o the proportion o child population in the age group 0-6 orthe 2001 and 2011 Censuses is given in Statement - 10. It would be o interest to note that in 2001 only 7districts had percentage o child population in the age group 0-6 less than 12 percent with a share o 29.74percent o the States population. Tis number o districts has swelled to 21 in 2011 and now has a share o67.07 per cent. Te number o districts having child population less than 16 per cent has increased rom 24with a share o about 82.69 percent o the States population in 2001 to 30 with a share o 100 percent in 2011.Tese results perhaps broadly indicate a drop in ertility across the State.

Meeting with Special Charge Officers

Census Publicity hoarding atKPCL office premises, Bangalore.


MAP -4

O OO O OO74 75 76 77 78 79


55/122


KARNATAKA

M

A

H

A

R

A

S

H

T

R

A

PR

A

D

E

SH

T A M I L

N

AD

U

KE

R

A

L A

A

N

D

H

R

A

PERCENTAGE DECADALPOPULATION GROWTH

2001 - 2011

ARABIAN

SEA

LA K

SH ADW

EE P

S E

A

G

O

A

020 20 40 60 80 100

KILOMETRES

STATE

DISTRICT

BOUNDARIES :-

74 75 76 77 78 79

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

16

17

18

12

13

14

15

OOOOOO74 75 76 77 78 79EAST OF GREENWICH

18

17

16

O

O

O

15

14

O

O

13

12

O

O

PERCENTAGE DECADAL POPULATIONGROWTH 2001 - 2011

The responsibility for the correctness of internal det ails rests with the publisher.

The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twel ve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line.The external boundaries and coastlines of India agree wit h the Record/Master Copy certified by Survey of Ind ia.

15.01 - 20.00

( State Average 15.67)

... ... ...

... ...

5.00 & BELOW

10.01 - 15.00

20.01 & ABOVE

0.00 & BELOW

GAIN

LOSS

Government of India Copyright, 2011.

5.01 - 10.00

T = TumkurT

BELGAUM13.38

BIJAPUR20.38

TUMKUR3.74

GULBARGA17.94

RAICHUR15.27

BELLARY24.92

SHIMOGA6.88

BIDAR13.16

HASSAN3.17

MYSORE13.39

YADGIR22.67

KOPPAL16.32

BAGALKOT14.46

GADAG9.61

HAVERI11.08

UTTARA KANNADA6.15

UDUPI5.90

KOLAR11.04

MANDYA2.55

CHITRADURGA9.39

CHIKMAGALUR-0.28

KODAGU1.13

DHARWAD15.13

DAKSHINA KANNADA9.80

DAVANAGERE8.71

CHAMARAJANAGAR5.75

RAMANAGARA5.06

CHIKKABALLAPURA9.17

BANGALORE46.68

BANGALORE RURAL16.02

CHART 5

A


56/122

56

BELGAUMBAGALKOT

BIJAPUR BIDAR

-10

0

10

20

30

-10

0

10

20

30

-10

0

10

20

30

-10

0

10

20

30

RAICHUR

KARNATAKA

PERCENTAGE DECADAL POPULATION GROWTH 1901-2011

-10

0

10

20

30

40

PE

R

C

E

N

T

A

G

E

D

EC

A

D

A

L

V

A

R

IA

T

IO

N

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

-10

0

10

20

30

40

KOPPAL

CENSUS YEARS CENSUS YEARS

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11


CHART 5

B


57/122


GADAG

-10

0

10

20

30

DHARWAD

UTTARA KANNADA HAVERI

BELLARY

-10

0

10

20

30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

P

E

R

C

E

N

T

A

GE

D

E

C

A

D

A

L

V

A

R

IA

T

IO

N

0

10

20

30

CHITRADURGA

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

-10

0

10

20

30

40

-10

0

10

20

30

40

CHART 5

C


58/122

58

-10

0

10

20

30

40

DAVANAGERE

-100

10203040506070

SHIMOGA

UDUPI

0

10

20

30

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

CHIKMAGALUR

TUMKUR

0

10

20

30

P

E

R

C

E

N

T

A

G

E

D

E

C

A

D

A

L

V

A

R

IA

T

IO

N

BANGALORE

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

010203040

50607080


CHART 5

D


59/122


MANDYA

0

10

20

30

HASSAN

DAKSHINA KANNADAKODAGU

MYSORE

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0

10

20

30PE

R

C

E

N

T

A

G

E

D

E

C

A

D

A

L

V

A

RI

A

T

IO

N

-10

0

10

20

30

CHAMARAJANAGAR

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

CHART 5

E


60/122

60

GULBARGA

-10

0

10

20

30

YADGIR

KOLAR

-10

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

CHIKKABALLAPURA

BANGALORE RURAL

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

P

E

R

C

E

N

T

A

G

E

D

E

C

A

D

A

L

V

A

RI

A

T

IO

N

0

10

20

30

RAMANAGARA

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11


CHART 5

F


61/122


PERCENTAGEDECADALVARIATION

KARNATAKA

-10

0

10

20

30

CENSUS YEARS

1901-11

1911-21

1921-31

1931-41

1941-51

1951-61

1961-71

1971-81

1981-91

1991-01

2001-11


62/122


63/122

4DENSITY OF POPULATION


64/122

4Density of population


65/122


Density of population

One o the important indices o population concentration is the density o population. It is defned as thenumber o persons per square kilometre. Te population density o Karnataka in 2011 was 319 persons persquare kilometre an increase rom 276 in 2001. It means that, on an average 43 more people inhabit everysquare kilometre area in the State than the numbers that lived a decade ago.

Te population density o Karnataka rom 1901 to 2011 is shown in statement-11. At the beginning o thetwentieth century, the density o Karnataka was as low as 68 and this has steadily increased rom one decadeto another to reach 319 in 2011. While in terms o absolute value it has increased, the percentage o increase

over 2001 indicates a downward trend. Te percentage increase in 2011 is 15.58 percent compared to 17.45percent in 2001.

STATEMENT - 11DENSITY OF POPULATION, KARNATAKA: 1901-2011

Census year Density(per sq. km)

Absoluteincrease

Percentageincrease

1901 68 - -

1911 71 3 4.41

1921 70 -1 -1.41

1931 76 6 8.57

1941 85 9 11.84

1951 101 16 18.82

1961 123 22 21.78

1971 153 30 24.39

1981 193 40 26.14

1991 235 42 21.76

2001 276 41 17.45

2011 319 43 15.58

In Statement - 12 the districts in the State are ranked in descending order according to the density opopulation. Bangalore district with 4378 persons per square kilometre is the most densely populated andranks frst in the State. Bangalore district which includes the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike limits inits jurisdiction has increased its habitants by 1393 per square kilometre during the decade. Kodagu is theleast populated district in the State with the density o 135 persons per square kilometre. Kodagu whichranked at the 29th place in 2001 Census has slipped to the last position. Te density o Chikmagalur district

remained constant over the last decade at 158 persons per square kilometre. Te districtwise density opopulation o Karnataka as in 2011 Census is given in Map - 5.

STATEMENT - 12RANKING OF DISTRICTS BY DENSITY : 2001 AND 2011

Rank in 2011 States/Districts Density (per sq.km) Rank in 2001

2011 2001


66/122

66

- Karnataka 319 276 -

1 Bangalore 4,378 2,985 1

2 Dakshina Kannada 457 416 23 Bangalore Rural 441 380 4

4 Mysore 437 385 3

5 Dharwad 434 377 5

6 Kolar 384 346 7

7 Mandya 365 356 6

8 Belgaum 356 314 8

9 Haveri 331 298 10

10 Davanagere 329 302 9

11 Bidar 312 276 13

12 Udupi 304 287 1213 Ramanagara 303 288 11

14 Bellary 300 240 18

15 Chikkaballapura 298 273 14

16 Bagalkot 288 251 16

17 Hassan 261 253 15

18 Tumkur 253 244 17

19 Koppal 250 215 19

20 Gulbarga 233 198 21

21 Gadag 229 209 20

22 Raichur 228 198 2223 Yadgir 224 183 25

24 Bijapur 207 172 27

25 Shimoga 207 194 23

26 Chamarajanagar 200 189 24

27 Chitradurga 197 180 26

28 Chikmagalur 158 158 28

29 Uttara Kannada 140 132 30

30 Kodagu 135 134 29

STATEMENT - 13RANKING OF NEIGHBOURING STATES AS PER DENSITY:2001 AND 2011

Rank in 2011 India/ States Density ( per sq. km.) Rank in 2001

2011 2001

- India 382 325 -

8 Kerala 859 819 8

12 Tamilnadu 555 480 11

16 Goa 394 364 14

17 Maharashtra 365 315 17

19 Karnataka 319 276 2020 Andhra Pradesh 308 277 19

A comparison with theneighbouring States o Karnatakais given in Statement - 13. Kerala isthe most densely populated State inthe Southern Region, which ranksat 8th place. From the statement itcan be seen that Karnataka whichranked 20th in 2001 has moved upto 19th rank in 2011 Census.

Density of population

MAP 5

KARNATAKA

O OO O OO74 75 76 77 78 79


67/122


KARNATAKA

M

A

H

A

R

A

S

H

T

R

A

PR

A

D

E

SH

T A M I L

N

AD

UK

E

R

A

LA

A

N

D

H

R

A

DENSITY OF POPULATION

2011

ARAB IAN

SEA

LAKS H

A D

W E

EP

SEA

G

O

A

020 20 40 60 80 100

KILOMETRES

STATE

DISTRICT

BOUNDARIES :-

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

16

17

18

12

13

14

15


18

17

16

O

O

O

15

14

O

O

13

12

O

O

PERSONS PER Sq. Km

Government of India Copyright, 2011.

351 - 425

T

( State Average 319 )

... ... ...

... ...

200 & BELOW

276 - 350

426 & ABOVE

The responsibility for the correctness of internal details rests with the publisher.

The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twelve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line.

The external boundaries and coastlines of India agree with the Record/Master Copy certified by Survey of India.

201 - 275

T = Tumkur

BELGAUM356

BIJAPUR207

TUMKUR253

GULBARGA233

RAICHUR228

BELLARY300

SHIMOGA207

BIDAR312

HASSAN261

MYSORE437

YADGIR224

KOPPAL250

BAGALKOT288

GADAG229

HAVERI331

UTTARAKANNADA

140

UDUPI304

KOLAR384

MANDYA365

CHITRADURGA197

CHIKMAGALUR158

KODAGU135

DAVANA-

GERE329

DHARWAD434

DAKSHINAKANNADA

457

CHIKKABALLAPURA298

CHAMARAJANAGAR200

RAMANAGARA303

BANGALORE4378

BANGALORE RURAL441


68/122


69/122

5GENDER COMPOSITIONOF POPULATION


70/122


71/122

68 1

1

CHART 6


72/122

72

KARNATAKA

SEXRA

TIO1901-2011

FIGURESONTOPOFTHEBARSREPRESENTS

SEXRATIOFOREACHCENSUSYEAR.

985

980

975

970

965

960

955

950

983

966

960

959

957

963

960

965

96

965

969

981

FEMALESPER1000MALES

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

20

CENSUSYEARS


73/122

CHART 7

B


74/122

74

GADAG DHARWAD

UTTARA KANNADA HAVERI

BELLARY CHITRADURGA

F

E

M

A

L

E

S

PE

R

1

0

0

0

M

A

L

ES

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011


Gender composition of population

CHART 7

C


75/122


DAVANAGERE SHIMOGA

UDUPI CHIKMAGALUR

TUMKUR BANGALORE


F

E

M

A

L

E

S

P

E

R

1

0

0

0

M

A

L

E

S

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

CHART 7

D


76/122

76

MANDYA HASSAN

DAKSHINA KANNADAKODAGU

MYSORE CHAMARAJANAGAR


F

E

M

A

L

E

S

P

E

R

1

0

0

0

M

A

L

E

S

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011


CHART 7

E


77/122


GULBARGA YADGIR

KOLAR CHIKKABALLAPURA

BANGALORE RURAL RAMANAGARA


F

E

M

A

L

E

S

PE

R

1

0

0

0

M

A

L

E

S

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011

1901

1911

1921

1931

1941

1951

1961

1971

1981

1991

2001

2011


78/122


began the 20th Century with avourable sex ratio o emales out numbering males, recorded unavourableratios in 2011. Further it can be seen rom the table that Udupi and Dakshina Kannada have maintainedtheir sex ratio avourabe to women throughout the period o analysis with some uctuations in the ratios. Itis interesting to note that in 2011 Udupi district has registered the lowest sex ratio in the last 10 decades.

STATEMENT - 16SEX RATIO OF TOTAL POPULATION AND CHILD


79/122


POPULATION IN THE AGE GROUP 0-6 : 2001 AND 2011

DistrictCode

States / Districts Sex ratio (females per1,000 males)

Total Population Child Population inthe age group 0-6

Population aged7 and above

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

- Karnataka 965 968 946 943 968 971

1 Belgaum 960 969 921 931 967 974

2 Bagalkot 980 984 940 929 988 994

3 Bijapur 950 954 928 930 955 958

4 Bidar 949 952 941 935 950 955

5 Raichur 983 992 964 949 987 9996 Koppal 983 983 953 953 989 988

7 Gadag 969 978 952 944 972 983

8 Dharwad 949 967 943 942 950 970

9 Uttara Kannada 971 975 946 947 974 979

10 Haveri 944 951 957 945 941 952

11 Bellary 969 978 947 954 973 982

12 Chitradurga 955 969 946 933 957 973

13 Davanagere 952 967 946 931 952 972

14 Shimoga 978 995 956 960 981 999

15 Udupi 1,130 1,093 958 955 1,151 1,106

16 Chikmagalur 984 1,005 959 963 988 1009

17 Tumkur 967 979 949 952 970 982

18 Bangalore 908 908 943 941 903 904

19 Mandya 986 989 934 934 993 994

20 Hassan 1,004 1,005 958 964 1,010 1,009

21 Dakshina Kannada 1,022 1,018 952 946 1,032 1,026

22 Kodagu 996 1,019 977 977 999 1,024

23 Mysore 964 982 962 956 964 984

24 Chamarajanagar 971 989 964 942 971 994

25 Gulbarga 958 962 931 935 964 967

26 Yadgir 982 984 952 942 989 993

27 Kolar 977 976 965 955 979 979

28 Chikkaballapura 966 968 952 945 968 970

29 Bangalore Rural 945 945 939 947 946 945

30 Ramanagara 964 976 945 960 967 977

Statement - 16 gives the sex ratio o the total population, sex ratio in the age group 06 and sex ratio o

population aged 7 and above or 2001 and 2011 or all the districts o Karnataka State. Te sex ratio o thedistricts as per the Provisional Population otals, 2011 is depicted in Map - 6.

KARNATAKA

SEX RAT IOKILOMETRES

O OO O OO74 75 76 77 78 79

MAP 6


80/122

80

M

A

H

A

R

A

S

H

T

R

A

P

R

A

D

E

S

H

T A MI

L

N

A

D

U

K

E

R

A

L

A

A

N

D

H

R

A

2011

ARABIAN

SEA

L

A

K

S

H

A

D

W

E

E

P

S

E

A

G

O

A

020 20 40 60 80 100

STATE

DISTRICT

BOUNDARIES :-

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

16

17

18

12

13

14

15

OOOOOO74 75 76 77 78 79EASTOF GREENWICH

18

17

16

O

O

O

15

14

O

O

13

12

O

O

FEMALES PER1000MALES

Government of IndiaCopyright, 2011.

986-1000

T

(StateAverage 968)

.. . . .. . ..

. .. . ..

955& BELOW

9 71 - 98 5

1001& ABOVE

Theresponsibility forthe correctnessof internaldetailsrests withthe publisher.

Theterritorialwatersof Indiaextendintothe seato a distanceof twelvenautical milesmeasuredfrom theappropriatebase line.

Theexternal boundaries andcoastlines ofIndia agree withthe Record/MasterCopy certifiedby Survey ofIndia.

95 6 - 97 0

T= Tumkur

BELGAUM969

BIJAPUR954

TUMKUR979

RAICHUR992

GULBARGA962

BELLARY978

SHIMOGA995

BIDAR952

HASSAN1005

MYSORE982

YADGIR984

KOPPAL983

GADAG978

HAVERI951

BAGALKOT984

UDUPI1093

UTTARAKANNADA975

MANDYA989

KOLAR976

CHITRADURGA969

CHIKMAGALUR1005

KODAGU1019

DAVANAGERE967

DHARWAD967

DAKSHINAKANNADA1018

CHAMARAJANAGAR989

RAMANAGARA976

CHIKKABALLAPURA968

BANGALORE908

BANGALORERURAL945


81/122

RAMANAGARA

KARNATAKA

49.19

49.38

9

CHART 8


82/122

82

K

ARNATAKA

PROPORTIONOFFEMALEPOPULATIONINDISTRICTS2011

53

52

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

INPERCENT

BELGAUM

BAGALKOT

BIJAPUR

BIDAR

RAICHUR

KOPPAL

GADAG

DHARWAD

UTTARAKANNADA

HAVERI

BELLARY

CHITRADURGA

DAVANAGERE

SHIMOGA

UDUPI

CHIKMAGALUR

TUMKUR

BANGALORE

MANDYA

HASSAN

DAKSHINAKANNADA

KODAGU

MYSORE

CHAMARAJANAGAR

GULBARGA

YADGIR

KOLAR

CHIKKABALLAPURA

BANGALORERURAL

49.21

49.60

49.17

49.20

49.44

48.75

49.37

49.15

49.45

49.58

49.79

48.77

48.83

49.88

50.12

49.48

47.59

49.72

50.135

0.44

50.48

49.54

49.72

49.04

49.61

48.59

49.18

49.40

52.21

FIGURESONTOPOFTHEBARSREPRESENTSPERCENTAGE

OFFEMALEPOPULATIONTOTOTALPOPULATION.


STATEMENT - 19SEX RATIO OF TOTAL POPULATION ANDCHILD POPULATION IN THE AGE GROUP 0-6: 1961-2011

Census years Sex ratio in the age group 0-6 years Overall sex ratio

1961 987 959

1971 978 957

1981 974 963


83/122


1991 960 960

2001 946 965

2011 943 968

Statement - 19 gives the sex ratio o the total population and child population in the age group 0-6 rom 1961to 2011. It is clear that the sex ratio in the age group 0-6 has decreased at a much aster pace than the overallsex ratio o the State aer 1981. While the 0-6 sex ratio has declined by 3 points between 2001 and 2011 theoverall sex ratio has increased by 3 points.

STATEMENT - 20DISTRIBUTION OF DISTRICTS BY RANGE OF

SEX RATIO OF CHILD POPULATION IN THE AGE-GOUP 0-6 : 2001 AND 2011Sex ratio Number of

DistrictsPercentage of Populationto total population 2001

(0-6 age)

Number ofDistricts

Percentage of population tototal population 2011

(0-6 age)

880 & below 0 0 0 0

881-915 0 0 0 0

916-950 15 61.79 19 71.91

951-985 15 38.21 11 28.09

986 & above 0 0 0 0

Statement - 20 gives the distribution o the districts by ranges o sex ratio o child population in the age

group 0-6 and their relative share in these ranges in terms o percentage o population to the total populationo the State in 2001 and 2011. None o the districts in the State has the child sex ratio below 915 and above986. Te trend that was observed in 2001 Census is witnessed in this Census also. However it is worrying tonote that number o districts with sex ratio 951-985 had reduced to 11 in 2011 resulting in over 10 percentdecrease in the share o population in this range during the decade.

STATEMENT - 21DISTRIBUTION OF DISTRICTS BY RANGE OFSEX RATIO OF POPULATION AGED 7+ : 2001 AND 2011

Sex ratio Number of Districts

Percentage of Population tototal population 2001

(7+ age)

Number ofDistricts

Percentage of population tototal population 2011

(7+ age)880 & below 0 0 0 0

881-915 1 12.62 1 15.86

916-950 4 10.13 1 1.63

951-985 15 51.48 16 53.52

986 & above 10 25.77 12 28.98

Statement - 21 provides the distribution o the districts by ranges o sex ratio o population in the agegroup o seven and above or the years 2001 and 2011. It also gives the percentage o population to thetotal population o the districts in each o the categories. It is seen rom the table that or the range o916-950 the percentage to total population has drastically reduced to 1.63 per cent in 2011 rom 10.13

percent in 2001.


84/122


85/122

6STATE OF LITERACY


86/122


87/122

KARNATAKA

A

LITERACY RATE FORPERSONS AND FEMALES

2011020 20 40 60 80 100

KILOMETRES

O OO O OO74 75 76 77 78 79

MAP 7


88/122

88

M

A

H

A

R

A

S

H

T

R

A

P

R

A

D

E

S

H

T A MI

L

N

A

D

U

K

E

R

A

L

A

A

N

D

H

R

A

2011

ARA BIAN

SEA

L

A

K

S

H

A

D

W

E

E

P

SE

A

G

O

A

STATE

DISTRICT

BOUNDARIES :-

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

16

17

18

12

13

14

15


18

17

16

O

O

O

15

14

O

O

13

12

O

O

62.01 - 71.00

80.01 & ABOVE

PERCENTAGE OFLITERATES TOTOTALP OPULATION EXCLUDING0 - 6 A G E - GR OU P

Government of India Copyright,2011.

71.01 - 80.00

T

( StateAverage 75.60 )

... . .. .. .

. .. .. .

53.00 & BELOW

62.01 - 71.00

80.01 & ABOVE

Theresponsibilityfor thecorrectness of internal details rests withthe publisher.

Theterritorial waters ofIndia extend intothe seato a distanceof twelve nauticalmiles measuredfrom theappropriate baseline.

Theexternalboundaries andcoastlinesof Indiaagreewith theRecord/MasterCopy certifiedby Survey of India.

53.01 - 62.00

T = Tumkur

71.01- 80.00

53.00 & BELOW

53.01- 62.00

( State Average 68.13)

THEFIGURES WITHINTHE DISTRICTSREPRESENTS FEMALELITERACY RATE

PERCENTAGEOF FEMALELITERATESTOTOTAL FEMALEPOPULATION EXCLUDING0- 6A GE- G RO UP

BELGAUM64.74

BIJAPUR56.54

TUMKUR66.45

RAICHUR49.56

BELLARY58.28

SHIMOGA74.89

BIDAR61.66

HASSAN68.30

MYSORE66.59

YADGIR41.31

KOPPAL56.22

GADAG65.29

HAVERI70.65

UTTARAKANNADA

78.21

UDUPI81.41

KOLAR66.56

MANDYA62.10

KODAGU77.91

DAVANA-GERE69.39

GULBARGA55.87

BAGALKOT58.55

CHITRADURGA66.05

CHIKMAGALUR72.88

DHARWAD73.57

CHAMARAJANAGAR54.32

DAKSHINAKANNADA

84.04

RAMANAGARA61.30

CHIKKA-BALLAPURA

61.55

BANGALORE84.80

BANGALORERURAL70.73


89/122

Statement - 23 shows the population aged seven and above and the absolute number o literates in2001, their percentage and decadal dierence during 2001 and 2011. Te percentage decadal increase inpopulation aged seven years and above during 2001 and 2011 is 18.85 percent while the correspondingincrease in the number o literates in the age group is 34.81 percent. Te districts which have showndecadal percentage increase o more than 50 per cent are Yadgir (66.44), Bangalore (59.12), Bellary (51.58)and Koppal (50.67). Tough Yadgir is the only district in the State to record less than 60 per cent literacyrate in 2011, in terms o percentage increase in number o literates during the decade it ranks frst in the

State with 66 44 per cent


90/122

90

State with 66.44 per cent.STATEMENT - 24NUMBER OF ILLITERATES, DECADAL DECREASEIN ILLITERATES AND PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTION IN DECREASE : 2001 - 2011

DistrictCode

States/Districts Number of illiterates Decadaldecrease innumber ofilliterates

(4-3)

Percentagecontributionin decrease

2001 2011

Karnataka 1,52,33,500 1,32,45,580 -1987920 100

01 Belgaum 12,85,195 10,87,623 -1,97,572 9.94

02 Bagalkot 5,92,235 4,98,073 -94,162 4.74

03 Bijapur 6,53,526 6,13,880 -39,646 1.99

04 Bidar 4,92,498 4,29,952 -62,546 3.15

05 Raichur 7,09,895 6,53,171 -56,724 2.85

06 Koppal 4,53,538 3,91,666 -61,872 3.11

07 Gadag 2,82,638 2,32,840 -49,798 2.51

08 Dharwad 3,93,441 3,22,446 -70,995 3.57

09 Uttara Kannada 2,76,117 2,06,113 -70,004 3.52

10 Haveri 3,97,895 3,15,947 -81,948 4.12

11 Bellary 7,27,571 7,04,349 -23,222 1.17

12 Chitradurga 4,68,671 3,88,189 -80,482 4.05

13 Davanagere 5,05,057 4,12,356 -92,701 4.66

14 Shimoga 3,65,448 3,07,763 -57,685 2.90

15 Udupi 1,87,078 1,47,706 -39,372 1.98

16 Chikmagalur 2,78,651 2,15,292 -63,359 3.19

17 Tumkur 7,51,064 6,23,781 -1,27,283 6.40

18 Bangalore 9,82,019 9,90,466 8,447 -0.42

19 Mandya 6,07,098 4,91,581 -1,15,517 5.81

20 Hassan 4,77,420 3,90,701 -86,719 4.36

21 Dakshina Kannada 2,77,932 2,14,121 -63,811 3.21

22 Kodagu 1,05,446 87,760 -17,686 0.89

23 Mysore 8,46,317 7,43,296 -1,03,021 5.18

24 Chamarajanagar 4,17,825 3,60,027 -57,798 2.91

25 Gulbarga 8,29,102 7,60,037 -69,065 3.47

26 Yadgir 4,67,921 4,70,318 2,397 -0.12

27 Kolar 4,10,337 3,53,799 -56,538 2.84

28 Chikkaballapura 4,06,996 3,37,966 -69,030 3.47

29 Bangalore Rural 2,26,117 1,92,170 -33,947 1.71

30 Ramanagara 3,58,452 3,02,191 -56,261 2.83


91/122

STATEMENT - 26NUMBER OF FEMALE ILLITERATES, DECADAL DECREASE IN FEMALEILLITERATES AND PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTION IN DECREASE : 2001 -2011

DistrictCode

State/ Districts Number of femaleilliterates

Decadal decreasein number of

female illiterates

Percentagecontribution in

decrease2001 2011

Karnataka 96,86,751 85,24,150 -11,62,601 100

01 Belgaum 8 41 669 7 26 180 1 15 489 9 93


92/122

92

01 Belgaum 8,41,669 7,26,180 -1,15,489 9.93

02 Bagalkot 3,89,096 3,36,157 -52,939 4.55

03 Bijapur 4,19,721 3,98,012 -21,709 1.87

04 Bidar 3,14,448 2,77,729 -36,719 3.16

05 Raichur 4,41,429 4,16,341 -25,088 2.16

06 Koppal 2,96,669 2,60,503 -36,166 3.11

07 Gadag 1,95,174 1,61,387 -33,787 2.91

08 Dharwad 2,57,094 2,12,990 -44,104 3.79

09 Uttara Kannada 1,83,660 1,39,041 -44,619 3.84

10 Haveri 2,55,401 2,01,897 -53,504 4.60

11 Bellary 4,60,886 4,52,727 -8,159 0.70

12 Chitradurga 2,97,975 2,48,213 -49,762 4.28

13 Davanagere 3,17,400 2,62,517 -54,883 4.72

14 Shimoga 2,35,202 1,98,112 -37,090 3.19

15 Udupi 1,32,491 1,05,191 -27,300 2.35

16 Chikmagalur 1,79,262 1,41,266 -37,996 3.27

17 Tumkur 4,82,683 4,03,834 -78,849 6.78

18 Bangalore 6,16,123 6,20,945 4,822 -0.41

19 Mandya 3,76,393 3,11,119 -65,274 5.61

20 Hassan 3,13,634 2,58,013 -55,621 4.78

21 Dakshina Kannada 1,93,314 1,52,044 -41,270 3.55

22 Kodagu 66,395 56,109 -10,286 0.88

23 Mysore 5,02,776 44,8931 -53,845 4.63

24 Chamarajanagar 2,41,068 2,10,843 -30,225 2.60

25 Gulbarga 5,16,416 4,79,990 -36,426 3.13

26 Yadgir 2,77,521 2,88,631 11,110 -0.96

27 Kolar 2,64,597 2,28,011 -36,586 3.15

28 Chikkaballapura 2,53,730 2,13,882 -39,848 3.43

29 Bangalore Rural 1,45,807 1,25,889 -19,918 1.71

30 Ramanagara 2,18,717 1,87,646 -31,071 2.67

Statement - 26 presents the district level fgures o emale illiterates in the 2001 and 2011 Censuses, thedecadal decrease in emale illiterates and the percentage contribution in the decrease. Te number o emaleilliterates in the State decreased rom 96,86,751 in 2001 to 85,24,150 in 2011 Census. Te maximum numbero emale illiterates decreased in Belgaum district, a decrease o 1,15,489 (contributing to 9.93 per cent o thedecrease in the State). It is pertinent to note that the number o emale illiterates have increased in Yadgir

and Bangalore districts in the decade 2001-2011.


93/122

STATEMENT - 28RANKING OF DISTRICTS BY LITERACY RATE : 2001 AND 2011

DistrictCode

States/Districts Literacy rate Rank Decadal differencein literacy rate

2001 2011 2001 2011

- Karnataka 66.64 75.60 - - 8.97

1 Belgaum 64.21 73.94 17 16 9.73

2 Bagalkot 57.30 69.39 24 22 12.09


94/122

94

3 Bijapur 57.01 67.20 25 26 10.19

4 Bidar 60.94 71.01 20 19 10.07

5 Raichur 48.81 60.46 29 29 11.65

6 Koppal 54.10 67.28 27 25 13.18

7 Gadag 66.11 75.18 14 13 9.07

8 Dharwad 71.61 80.30 8 7 8.69

9 Uttara Kannada 76.60 84.03 5 4 7.43

10 Haveri 67.79 77.60 11 10 9.81

11 Bellary 57.40 67.85 23 24 10.43

12 Chitradurga 64.45 73.82 16 17 9.37

13 Davanagere 67.43 76.30 12 11 8.87

14 Shimoga 74.52 80.50 6 6 5.98

15 Udupi 81.25 86.29 3 3 5.04

16 Chikmagalur 72.20 79.24 7 8 7.04

17 Tumkur 67.01 74.32 13 15 7.31

18 Bangalore 82.96 88.48 2 2 5.5719 Mandya 61.05 70.14 19 20 9.09

20 Hassan 68.63 75.89 10 12 7.26

21 Dakshina Kannada 83.35 88.62 1 1 5.27

22 Kodagu 77.99 82.52 4 5 4.53

23 Mysore 63.48 72.56 18 18 9.08

24 Chamarajanagar 50.87 61.12 28 28 10.25

25 Gulbarga 54.34 65.65 26 27 11.31

26 Yadgir 39.90 52.36 30 30 12.46

27 Kolar 65.84 74.33 15 14 8.49

28 Chikkaballapura 59.24 70.08 22 21 10.84

29 Bangalore Rural 69.59 78.29 9 9 8.70

30 Ramanagara 60.71 69.20 21 23 8.49

Statement - 28 gives ranking o the districts by literacy rates o 2001 and 2011 along with decadal dierence.In terms o overall literacy rate by order o ranking, the ranking in 2001 and 2011 Censuses show a similartrend. Te decadal dierence in literacy rate or the State is 8.97 per cent. Out o 30 districts in Karnataka,16 districts have decadal dierence above the State average and 14 districts below the State average. Koppal

has the highest decadal dierence o 13.18 per cent ollowed by 12.46 per cent in Yadgir district.

State of literacy

STATEMENT - 29LITERACY RATES AND DECADAL DIFFERENCE IN LITERACY RATES BY SEX : 2001-2011

DistrictCode

States/Districts 2001 Gap inliteracy

rate

2011 Gap inliteracy

rate

Decadal difference inliteracy rates

Males Females Males Females Males Females

- Karnataka 76.10 56.87 19.23 82.85 68.13 14.72 6.75 11.26

01 Belgaum 75.70 52.32 23.38 82.90 64.74 18.16 7.20 12.42

02 Bagalkot 70.88 43.56 27.32 80.16 58.55 21.61 9.28 14.99


95/122


03 Bijapur 69.94 43.47 26.47 77.41 56.54 20.87 7.47 13.07

04 Bidar 72.46 48.81 23.65 79.94 61.66 18.28 7.48 12.85

05 Raichur 61.52 35.93 25.59 71.35 49.56 21.79 9.83 13.63

06 Koppal 68.42 39.61 28.81 78.21 56.22 21.99 9.79 16.61

07 Gadag 79.32 52.52 26.80 84.89 65.29 19.60 5.57 12.77

08 Dharwad 80.82 61.92 18.90 86.83 73.57 13.26 6.01 11.65

09 Uttara Kannada 84.53 68.47 16.06 89.72 78.21 11.51 5.19 9.74

10 Haveri 77.61 57.37 20.24 84.22 70.65 13.57 6.61 13.28

11 Bellary 69.20 45.28 23.92 77.24 58.28 18.96 8.04 13.00

12 Chitradurga 74.66 53.78 20.88 81.37 66.05 15.32 6.71 12.27

13 Davanagere 76.37 58.04 18.33 83.02 69.39 13.63 6.65 11.35

14 Shimoga 82.01 66.88 15.13 86.11 74.89 11.22 4.10 8.01

15 Udupi 88.23 75.19 13.04 91.69 81.41 10.28 3.46 6.22

16 Chikmagalur 80.29 64.01 16.28 85.66 72.88 12.78 5.37 8.87

17 Tumkur 76.78 56.94 19.84 82.05 66.45 15.60 5.27 9.51

18 Bangalore 87.92 77.48 10.44 91.82 84.80 7.02 3.90 7.32

19 Mandya 70.50 51.53 18.97 78.14 62.10 16.04 7.64 10.57

20 Hassan 78.37 59.00 19.37 83.55 68.30 15.25 5.18 9.30

21 Dakshina Kannada 89.70 77.21 12.49 93.31 84.04 9.27 3.61 6.83

22 Kodagu 83.70 72.26 11.44 87.24 77.91 9.33 3.54 5.65

23 Mysore 70.88 55.81 15.07 78.44 66.59 11.85 7.56 10.78

24 Chamarajanagar 59.03 42.48 16.55 67.88 54.32 13.56 8.85 11.84

25 Gulbarga 66.18 42.06 24.12 75.11 55.87 19.24 8.93 13.81

26 Yadgir 51.35 28.32 23.03 63.33 41.31 22.02 11.98 12.99

27 Kolar 75.99 55.46 20.53 81.94 66.56 15.38 5.95 11.10

28 Chikkaballapura 69.80 48.33 21.47 78.36 61.55 16.81 8.56 13.22

29 Bangalore Rural 78.99 59.67 19.32 85.44 70.73 14.71 6.45 11.06

30 Ramanagara 69.88 51.22 18.66 76.92 61.30 15.62 7.04 10.08

Statement - 29 presents literacy rates and decadal dierence in literacy rates by sex or 2001-2011. It isquite evident rom the statement that the gender gap in literacy rate between 2001 and 2011 Censuses hadnarrowed down over the period o ten years in all the districts. As it was already pointed out that emalesoutnumber males in terms o increase in absolute number o literates, the percentage decadal dierence inliteracy rate also depicts the same trend. It may be observed rom the statement that this decadal dierenceis high among emales in all the districts.

STATEMENT

DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION AND

SHARE OF

Range ofLiteracyrate

No. ofDistricts

2001

Population Literates

Absolute Percentage Absolute Percentage

Total 30 5,28,50,562 100.00 3,04,34,962 100.00

0 39 99 1 9 56 180 1 81 3 10 588 1 02


96/122

96

Te statistics presented in able 4 have been summarized in Statement - 30. Te comparable fgures othe 2001 and 2011 Censuses have been presented in this statement. As per the provisional fgures o 2011

Census, number o districts alling under dierent ranges as given in the statement have remarkably changedduring the decade. None o the districts in the State have below 50 per cent literacy rate. Yadgir is the only

0-39.99 1 9,56,180 1.81 3,10,588 1.02

40-49.99 1 16,69,762 3.16 6,76,799 2.22

50-59.99 7 1,09,71,250 20.76 51,87,429 17.04

60-69.99 13 2,34,16,365 44.31 1,32,12,600 43.41

70-79.99 5 62,89,908 11.90 40,62,659 13.35

80+ 3 95,47,097 18.06 69,84,887 22.95

Total 30 26,898,918 100.00 1,76,61,211 100.00

0-39.99 0 0 0 0 0

40-49.99 0 0 0 0 0

50-59.99 2 9,72,287 3.61 4,55,622 2.58

60-69.99 7 56,20,942 20.90 32,02,412 18.13

70-79.99 13 1,22,28,044 45.46 79,15,012 44.82

80+ 8 80,77,645 30.03 60,88,165 34.47

Total 30 2,59,51,644 100.00 1,27,73,751 100.00

0-39.99 3 18,94,532 7.30 5,51,763 4.32

40-49.99 7 55,31,229 21.31 20,94,382 16.40

50-59.99 12 1,07,66,523 41.49 51,68,225 40.46

60-69.99 4 28,25,797 10.89 16,10,693 12.61

70-79.99 4 49,33,563 19.01 33,48,688 26.22

80+ 0 - 0 - 0

State of literacy

-30

LITERATES BY LITERACY RATES : 2001-2011

DISTRICTS

2011 Range of LiteracyrateNo. of

DistrictsPopulation Literates

Absolute Percentage Absolute Percentage

30 6,11,30,704 100.00 4,10,29,323 100.00 Total

0 0 0 0 39 99


97/122


0 - 0 - 0 0-39.99

0 - 0 - 0 40-49.99

1 11,72,985 1.92 5,16,940 1.26 50-59.99

8 1,45,82,969 23.86 83,75,022 20.41 60-69.99

14 2,69,30,193 44.05 1,78,47,162 43.50 70-79.99

7 1,84,44,557 30.17 1,42,90,199 34.83 80+

30 3,10,57,742 100.00 2,28,08,468 100.00 Total

0 0 0 0 0 0-39.99

0 0 0 0 0 40-49.99

0 - 0 - 0 50-59.99

2 11,04,463 3.56 6,29,118 2.76 60-69.99

10 98,45,449 31.70 66,52,669 29.17 70-79.99

18 2,01,07,830 64.74 1,55,26,681 68.07 80+

30 3,00,72,962 100.00 1,82,20,855 100.00 Total

0 - 0 - 0 0-39.99

2 15,40,161 5.12 6,12,296 3.36 40-49.99

6 57,07,301 18.98 28,17,991 15.47 50-59.99

12 1,19,93,783 39.88 70,15,344 38.50 60-69.99

7 46,02,245 15.30 30,50,778 16.74 70-79.99

3 62,29,472 20.71 47,24,446 25.93 80+

district that alls in the range 50.00 59.99 rate. wenty one districts in the State have literacy rate above 70percent. With regard to males, 28 districts can be proud o having more than 70 percent literates. However,

the scenario is not so remarkable in case o emales. Tere are 20 districts which have less than 70 percentemale literacy.

CHART 9

75.6082.85

68.13

69.2076.92

61.30

78.2985.44

70.73

78.3661.55

CHIKKABALLAPURA

BANGALORERURAL

RAMANAGARA

KARNATAKA


98/122

98

67.8577.24

58.28

73.8281.37

66.05

80.50

86.1174.89

86.2991.69

81.41

79.2485.66

72.88

74.3282.05

66.45

88.4891.82

84.80

70.1478.14

62.10

75.8983.55

68.30

Provisional Population Totals, Paper 1 of 2011, Karnataka

Documents