WHAT IS VISION 2050? VISION 2050 is Southeastern Wisconsin’s long-range land use and transportation plan. It makes recommendations to local and State government to shape and guide land use development and transportation improvement, including public transit, arterial streets and highways, freight, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, to the year 2050. Developing VISION 2050 involved substantial work over a three-year period, culminating with SEWRPC adopting the plan in July 2016. The process was guided by the Commission’s Advisory Committees on Regional Land Use Planning and Regional Transportation Planning, which are also guiding work on the currently proposed plan amendment. Given that the Regional Planning Commission is an advisory agency, implementing the VISION 2050 recommendations for land use and transportation depends on the actions of local, county, areawide, State, and Federal government agencies. Commission staff will continue to work with these various entities as they conduct more detailed local planning related to plan implementation. PROPOSED VISION 2050 AMENDMENT WHY IS THE PLAN BEING AMENDED? VISION 2050 was adopted in July 2016, prior to any knowledge of the Foxconn development that is being constructed in the Village of Mount Pleasant. Given the size and significance of this development, VISION 2050 needs to be amended to incorporate land use changes to accommodate additional residents and jobs related to the Foxconn manufacturing campus. In addition, the plan amendment incorporates transportation improvements to serve the Foxconn area. As part of the plan amendment, based on changes in funding for transportation projects in the last State budget, staff also revisited the analysis of expected transportation costs and revenues. This updated analysis identifies the portion of the recommended transportation system that can reasonably be funded, which is referred to as the Fiscally Constrained Transportation Plan. HOW TO PROVIDE INPUT Once you have reviewed the information presented at today’s meeting regarding the proposed plan amendment, we encourage you to provide your feedback to us. Written Comments Please use the comment cards available at this meeting to write down any comments you might have. Verbal Comments Please speak to the court reporter or a staff member if you prefer to provide verbal comments. If you would prefer to comment at a later time, you can submit comments through September 30, 2018, in any of the following ways: > Website: vision2050sewis.org > E-mail: [email protected] > Mail: P.O. Box 1607 Waukesha, WI 53187-1607 > Fax: (262) 547-1103 HOW WILL MY COMMENTS BE CONSIDERED? All comments submitted by September 30, 2018, will be entered into the public record, and will be considered as staff prepares a revised plan amendment for consideration by the VISION 2050 Advisory Committees and the Regional Planning Commission.
PROPOSED VISION 2050 AMENDMENT · > E-mail: [email protected] > Mail: P.O. Box 1607 aukesha, WI 53187-1607W > Fax: (262) 547-1103. HOW WILL MY COMMENTS BE CONSIDERED? All comments
Oct 02, 2020
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
WHAT IS VISION 2050?VISION 2050 is Southeastern Wisconsin’s long-range land use and transportation plan. It makes recommendations to local and State government to shape and guide land use development and transportation improvement, including public transit, arterial streets and highways, freight, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, to the year 2050.
Developing VISION 2050 involved substantial work over a three-year period, culminating with SEWRPC adopting the plan in July 2016. The process was guided by the Commission’s Advisory Committees on Regional Land Use Planning and Regional Transportation Planning, which are also guiding work on the currently proposed plan amendment.
Given that the Regional Planning Commission is an advisory agency, implementing the VISION 2050 recommendations for land use and transportation depends on the actions of local, county, areawide, State, and Federal government agencies. Commission staff will continue to work with these various entities as they conduct more detailed local planning related to plan implementation.
PROPOSED VISION 2050 AMENDMENT
WHY IS THE PLAN BEING AMENDED?VISION 2050 was adopted in July 2016, prior to any knowledge of the Foxconn development that is being constructed in the Village of Mount Pleasant. Given the size and significance of this development, VISION 2050 needs to be amended to incorporate land use changes to accommodate additional residents and jobs related to the Foxconn manufacturing campus. In addition, the plan amendment incorporates transportation improvements to serve the Foxconn area. As part of the plan amendment, based on changes in funding for transportation projects in the last State budget, staff also revisited the analysis of expected transportation costs and revenues. This updated analysis identifies the portion of the recommended transportation system that can reasonably be funded, which is referred to as the Fiscally Constrained Transportation Plan.
HOW TO PROVIDE INPUTOnce you have reviewed the information presented at today’s meeting regarding the proposed plan amendment, we encourage you to provide your feedback to us.
Written CommentsPlease use the comment cards available at this meeting to write down any comments you might have.
Verbal CommentsPlease speak to the court reporter or a staff member if you prefer to provide verbal comments.
If you would prefer to comment at a later time, you can submit comments through September 30, 2018, in any of the following ways:
> Website: vision2050sewis.org
> E-mail: [email protected]
> Mail: P.O. Box 1607Waukesha, WI 53187-1607
> Fax: (262) 547-1103
HOW WILL MY COMMENTS BE CONSIDERED?All comments submitted by September 30, 2018, will be entered into the public record, and will be considered as staff prepares a revised plan amendment for consideration by the VISION 2050 Advisory Committees and the Regional Planning Commission.
WHAT DOES VISION 2050 ALREADY RECOMMEND?Local planning will continue for many years around the Foxconn manufacturing campus. Much of this local planning is not expected to require amending VISION 2050. As the affected communities and Racine County conduct more detailed planning, VISION 2050 should be considered as a guide and the Commission staff as a resource.
In anticipation of this planning, the amendment highlights key VISION 2050 recommendations already included in the plan that provide guidance to implementing agencies and units of government working on the Foxconn project or related activities (see the full amendment document for more details). These recommendations support:
> Efficiently and responsibly developing land
> Providing the right mix of housing for workers near their jobs
> Achieving a multimodal transportation system that serves the needs of all potential workers andresidents in the area
Highlighting VISION 2050’s recommendations as originally adopted is also important because it establishes an understanding of the recommendations before identifying what changes are being proposed under the plan amendment.
LAND USEVISION 2050 is intended to provide a guide, or overall framework, for future land use within the Region. Implementation of the land use recommendations ultimately relies on planning decisions made at the community level. Incorporating key VISION 2050 land use recommendations in future community planning decisions regarding the area around Foxconn would have many benefits to the communities and those who may seek to work and live within the communities.
A mix of housing types and land uses should be developed to provide:
> A variety of housing types (multifamily, single-family on smaller lots) affordable to a wide rangeof incomes
> Access to job opportunities for workers withtransportation barriers, which can help reduceeconomic and educational disparities betweenwhite and minority populations
> Walkable neighborhoods near amenities to attractworkers
A compact development pattern should be achieved to:
> Allow municipal services (e.g., public sewer,water, and transit) to be provided more efficientlyand cost-effectively
> Minimize impacts to natural and agriculturalresources
PERTINENT VISION 2050 RECOMMENDATIONS
PERTINENT VISION 2050 RECOMMENDATIONS
TRANSPORTATIONThe transportation component of VISION 2050 includes the following six elements: public transit, bicycle and pedestrian, transportation systems management, travel demand management, arterial streets and highways, and freight transportation. Some of these elements are more directly affected by the plan amendment than others, but there are recommendations from each of these elements that should be considered in the ongoing decision-making regarding transportation improvements to serve the Foxconn campus.
Significantly improved and expanded public transit:
> Added commuter rail lines, including a Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee line with stationsthat could be connected to the Foxconn campus
> Added express bus routes, including two in the vicinity of the Foxconn campus
> Increased frequency and expanded service area of Racine-area local bus service
> Improved Amtrak Hiawatha service between Milwaukee and Chicago, which includesa Sturtevant station about three miles north of Foxconn
Significantly improved and expanded bicycle and pedestrian facilities:
> On-street bicycle accommodations on all surface arterials (non-freeways)
> Enhanced bicycle facilities that go beyond a traditional bike lane (e.g., protectedbike lane or path within a road’s right-of-way) in key regional corridors
> Expanded off-street bicycle path system
> Expanded bike share program implementation
> Safe, efficient, and accessible pedestrian facilities
Road capacity and design that address traffic impacts and safety, and accommodate all users:
> Routine maintenance, periodic rehabilitation, and reconstruction of roadway infrastructure to keep thearterial system in a state of good repair
> Complete streets concepts to allow safe and convenient travel for all roadway users traveling byvarious modes
> Strategically expanded arterial capacity to address congestion
Employer-sponsored programs to reduce vehicle trips and VMT:
> High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) preferential treatment, such as preferential parking for those who carpoolor vanpool
> Parking cash-out, which involves charging employees for parking then offsetting that cost with additionalpay to encourage alternatives to driving alone
> Live near your work programs designed to help workers buy or rent ahome near their employer
Freight improvements:
> Address forecast congestion on the regional freight highway network toimprove reliability
> Accommodate oversize/overweight (OSOW) shipments, particularly bymaintaining appropriate clearances
> Pursue a new truck-rail intermodal facility in the Region so intermodalshipments can avoid the highly congested Chicago area
LAND USE CHANGESVISION 2050 is being revised to accommodate an additional 32,400 residents and 17,000 jobs related to development associated with Foxconn. Various sources have estimated the total employment impact associated with Foxconn at about 30,000 jobs, but staff estimates that about half of these jobs could be absorbed by employment growth originally envisioned under VISION 2050.
The amendment accommodates the additional residents and jobs through revisions to the regional land use development pattern:
> Much of the new development isanticipated to be industrial andcommercial
> New housing units nearthe Foxconn campus arerecommended to be eithermultifamily housing or single-family homes on lots of 1/4 acreor less
The amendment also:
> Incorporates requestedamendments to the adoptedsewer service areas for the City ofRacine and environs and the Cityof Kenosha and environs
> Adds a new major economicactivity center encompassing thearea in and around the Foxconncampus
M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
Norway Raymond
Yorkville
Paris
Somers
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
STURTEVANT
LAKEPADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELMGROVE
BUTLER
WEST
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
CORNERS
BAY
HALES
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SOMERS
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLINOAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEKMUSKEGO
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
RACINE
KENOSHA
REVISED
M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
Norway Raymond
Yorkville
Paris
Somers
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
STURTEVANT
LAKEPADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELMGROVE
BUTLER
WEST
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
CORNERS
BAY
HALES
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SOMERS
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLINOAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEKMUSKEGO
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
RACINE
KENOSHA
ORIGINAL
SURFACE WATER
PRIMARY ENVIRONMENTALCORRIDOR
AGRICULTURAL AND OTHER OPEN LANDS
MIXED-USE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD(Residential and Other Urban Land—At Least7.0 to 17.9 Dwelling Units per Net Residential Acre)
SMALL LOT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD(Residential and Other Urban Land—At Least4.4 to 6.9 Dwelling Units per Net Residential Acre)
MEDIUM LOT NEIGHBORHOOD(Residential and Other Urban Land—At Least2.3 to 4.3 Dwelling Units per Net Residential Acre)
LARGE LOT NEIGHBORHOOD(Residential and Other Urban Land—At Least0.7 to 2.2 Dwelling Units per Net Residential Acre)
MIXED-USE CITY CENTER(Residential and Other Urban Land—At Least18.0 Dwelling Units per Net Residential Acre)
LARGE LOT EXURBAN(Residential Land—0.2 to 0.6 Dwelling Units per Net Residential Acre)
RURAL ESTATE(0.1 to 0.2 Dwelling Units per Acre)
Primary Impact Area
0 1 2 3 Miles
Source: SEWRPC
REVISIONS TO VISION 2050 LAND USE COMPONENT
2,0
19
,90
0
1,1
76
,60
0
2,3
89
,20
0
1,4
05
,70
0
2,4
21
,60
0
1,4
22
,70
0
Existing Population(2010)
Planned Population(2050 Original)
Planned Population(2050 as Amended)
Existing Employment(2010)
Planned Employment(2050 Original)
Planned Employment(2050 as Amended)
FIGURE 1 | Existing and Planned Population and Employment
FIGURE 2 | Revisions to Land Use Development Pattern: VISION 2050
Figure 2 compares the proposed land use changes to the land use development pattern originally recommended in VISION 2050.
Existing Roadways to be Improved
> Widen STH 11 (Durand Avenue)from two to four travel lanesbetween 56th Road and I-94and from four to six travel lanesbetween I-94 and CTH H
> Widen CTH KR from two to sixtravel lanes between I-94 andCTH H and from two to four travellanes between CTH H and STH 32
> Widen Braun Road from two tosix travel lanes between I-94 andCTH H
> Widen CTH H from two to fourtravel lanes between CTH KR andVenice Avenue
New Roadways
> Extend International Drive as anew four-lane facility from justsouth of STH 20 (WashingtonAvenue) to STH 11 (DurandAvenue) and remove plannedextension between STH 11 andBraun Road
> Add Wisconn Valley Way as a newfour-lane facility between STH 11(Durand Avenue) and CTH KR
REVISIONS TO VISION 2050 TRANSPORTATION COMPONENT
ARTERIAL STREET AND HIGHWAY CHANGESThe Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) is designing and constructing several surface arterial improvements in the vicinity of the Foxconn manufacturing campus. The proposed VISION 2050 amendment reflects WisDOT’s planned surface arterial improvements, referred to as the Foxconn development roads, which include the new and reconstructed roadway segments listed below.
Figure 3 compares the proposed arterial improvement changes to arterial improvements originally recommended in VISION 2050.
88
6 4
6
6
6
66 6
4
6
6
6
444
4
4
64 44
6
6 6
6
4
4
44
4
4
!
!
!
!
4
")H")T
")X
")KR
")G")EA
")KR
")H
**³±
##
20
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
32
,-41
0141
,-94")A
")C
YorkvilleSomers
STURTEVANT
RACINE
ELMWOODPARK
SOMERS
MOUNTPLEASANT
REVISEDPrimary
Impact Area
!
!
!
88
4 4
6
6
6
66 6
4
6
6
6
444
4
4
44 44
!
4
")A ")V
")H")T
")X
")KR
")G")EA
")KR
")H**
³±
##20
**
³±
##
11
**³±
##
32
,-41
0141
,-94")C
YorkvilleSomers
STURTEVANT
RACINE
ELMWOODPARK
SOMERS
MOUNTPLEASANT
ORIGINAL
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
EXISTING!
ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY
NEW
WIDENING AND/OR OTHER IMPROVEMENT TO PROVIDE SIGNIFICANT ADDITIONAL CAPACITY
NEW FACILITY WITH RIGHT-OF-WAYTO ACCOMMODATE FUTUREIMPROVEMENT (ADDITIONAL LANES)
RESURFACING OR RECONSTRUCTION TOPROVIDE ESSENTIALLY THE SAME CAPACITY
SEWRPCSource:
0 1 2 Miles
RESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ACCOMMODATEPOTENTIAL FUTURE IMPROVEMENT BEYOND 2050 (ADDITIONAL LANES OR NEW FACILITY)
NUMBER OF TRAFFIC LANES FOR NEW ORIMPROVED FACILITY, INCLUDING RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATIONS (2 LANES WHERE UNNUMBERED)
4
FIGURE 3 | Revisions to VISION 2050 Arterial Street and Highway System
The recommended public transit services, which are in addition to significantly expanded and improved services already recommended in VISION 2050, include:
> Add three new commuter busroutes to the Foxconn campus
H From downtown Racine alongSheridan Road (STH 32) and CTH KR
H From western Racine County along STH 11
H From downtown Milwaukee along I-94 (extending past Foxconn into Kenosha County)
> Improve local transit service in theimpacted area
H Extend RYDE Route 1 alongBraun Road
H Shuttle service along CTH H from Sturtevant Amtrak Station
Proposed changes to the bicycle network include:
> Additional bicycle accommodationsalong the new Foxconndevelopment roads
> Extend the enhanced bicyclefacility corridors along STH 11and CTH KR in the Racine area,both connecting to the Foxconncampus
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!!!!!
!! !!!!
!!
Norway Raymond
Yorkville
Paris
Somers
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
STURTEVANT
LAKEPADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELMGROVE
BUTLER
WEST
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
CORNERS
BAY
HALES
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SOMERS
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLINOAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEKMUSKEGO
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
RACINE
KENOSHA
W A U K E S H A C O . M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
**
³±
##
32**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
24**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
119
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
794
**
³±
##
36
**
³±##
31
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
158
**
³±
##
165
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
241
**
³±
##
175
0141
0118
0145
0141
0141
0145
0145
0145
0141
,-94
,-43
,-94
,-94
,-794
,-894
,-43 ,-894
,-94
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
REVISED
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!!!!!
!! !!!!
!!
Norway Raymond
Yorkville
Paris
Somers
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
STURTEVANT
LAKEPADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELMGROVE
BUTLER
WEST
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
CORNERS
BAY
HALES
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SOMERS
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLINOAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEKMUSKEGO
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
RACINE
KENOSHA
W A U K E S H A C O . M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
**
³±
##
32**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
24**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
119
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
794
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
158
**
³±
##
165
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
241
**
³±
##
175
0141
0118
0145
0141
0141
0145
0145
0145
0141
,-94
,-43
,-94
,-94
,-794
,-894
,-43 ,-894
,-94
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
ORIGINAL
SEWRPCSource:
0 1 2 3 Miles
TRANSIT SERVICES LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE AREA AND PEAK FREQUENCY
EVERY 15 MINUTES OR BETTER
LESS FREQUENT THAN EVERY 15 MINUTES
ONE DAY ADVANCE-RESERVATION SHARED-RIDE TAXI
STREETCAR LINE
INTERCITY RAIL
COMMUTER BUS ROUTE & PARK-RIDE
COMMUTER RAIL LINE & STATION
EXPRESS BUS ROUTE
RAPID TRANSIT LINE
!!
TO BURLINGTON
REVISIONS TO VISION 2050 TRANSPORTATION COMPONENT
Figure 4 compares the proposed transit service changes to the transit services originally recommended in VISION 2050.
PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE AND BICYCLE NETWORK CHANGESThe recommended public transit element and bicycle and pedestrian element would also be amended to meet the multimodal transportation needs in the area of the potential new development.
FIGURE 4 | Revisions to VISION 2050 Transit Services
PREVIOUS FINANCIAL ANALYSISWhen VISION 2050 was initially prepared, the financial analysis identified a difference between the cost to build, maintain, and operate the recommended transportation system and what the Region’s existing and expected revenues would allow the Region to afford. As a result, the funded portion of the plan, referred to as the “Fiscally Constrained Transportation Plan (FCTP),” was identified. The FCTP originally included all transportation elements of VISION 2050 except for portions of the public transit element.
Specifically, most of the major transit improvement and expansion components in VISION 2050 were not included in the FCTP, and reductions in current transit service were expected to continue. However, the analysis noted that the recommended arterial system improvements, particularly reconstructing the regional freeway system, would require funding levels from State budgets of the previous decade to be maintained.
UPDATED FINANCIAL ANALYSISIn revisiting this analysis of existing and reasonably expected costs and revenues associated with the transportation system recommended in VISION 2050, staff reconfirmed insufficient funding for the recommended public transit improvements. The updated analysis also shows that expected revenues will be insufficient to complete the recommended reconstruction of several portions of the Region’s arterial street and highway system by 2050. This will result mostly in a reduction in the amount of freeway that can be reconstructed, but will also reduce the amount of surface arterials (non-freeways) that can be reconstructed with additional lanes or can be newly constructed by 2050.
UPDATED FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR VISION 2050 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
PublicTransit
Capital
Bicycle &Pedestrian
Streets &Highways
$129
$719 $90 $809
$253 $382
$6
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Operations and Maintenance
PublicTransit
Bicycle &Pedestrian
Streets &Highways
$99
$459 $79 $538
$111 $210
$6
FIGURE 5 | Transportation System Investment Required for VISION 2050 as Amended (Average Annual in Millions of 2017$)
FIGURE 6 | Funding Available for VISION 2050 as Amended (Average Annual in Millions of 2017$)
UPDATED FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR VISION 2050 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
MAP 1 | Fiscally Constrained Transit System as Revised
MAP 2 | Schedule for Reconstructing the Freeway System Under the Revised FCTP
MAP 3 | Fiscally Constrained Arterial Street and Highway System as Revised
!!
L A K EM I C H I G A N
Dover
Norway RaymondWaterford
Yorkville
Burlington
Port Washington
Grafton
BelgiumFredonia
Cedarburg
Saukville
Salem
Paris
Somers
Randall
Brighton
Wheatland
Linn
Troy
LyonsGeneva
Sharon
Darien Delavan
Richmond
Walworth
La Grange
Lafayette
Bloomfield
East TroyWhitewater
Sugar Creek Spring Prairie
West Bend
Polk
Erin
Wayne
Barton
Addison Trenton
Jackson
Kewaskum
Hartford
Farmington
Eagle
Merton
Ottawa
Vernon
Lisbon
Waukesha
Delafield
Mukwonago
Oconomowoc
Brookfield
Germantown
Genesee
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
WATERFORD
ROCHESTER
STURTEVANT
BAY
GENOACITY
BLOOMFIELD
SHARON
DARIEN
WILLIAMS
WALWORTH
FONTANA ONGENEVA LAKE
EASTTROY
NEWBURG
SLINGER
JACKSON
GERMANTOWN
KEWASKUM
BELGIUM
FREDONIA
SAUKVILLE
THIENSVILLE
GRAFTON
TWIN
LAKE
LAKE
LAKES
SILVER
PADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELM
LAKE
WALES
EAGLE
NORTH
GROVE
MERTON
SUSSEX
LANNON
BUTLER
PRAIRIE
DOUSMAN
HARTLANDPEWAUKEENASHOTAH
CHENEQUA
BIGBEND
MUKWONAGO
MENOMONEE FALLS
OCONOMOWOC
LAC LABELLE
WEST
BAYSIDE
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
BROWNDEER RIVER
HILLS
CORNERS
BAY
FOX
WHITEFISH
HALES
POINT
RICHFIELD
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SUMMIT
SOMERS
WEST BEND
HARTFORD
LAKEGENEVA
DELAVAN
ELKHORN
WHITEWATER
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLIN
GLENDALE
OAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEK
PORT
MEQUON
CEDARBURG
WASHINGTON
MUSKEGO
WAUKESHA
DELAFIELD
OCONOMOWOC
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
PEWAUKEE
RACINE
BURLINGTON
KENOSHA
W A S H I N G T O N C O .
W A U K E S H A C O . M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
O Z A U K E E C O .
W A L W O R T H C O .
,-94
,-94
,-94
,-43
,-43
,-43
,-94
,-94
,-794
,-894
,-43
,-43
,-43,-894
,-94
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
**
³±
##
60
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
33
**
³±
##
28
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
144
**
³±
##
144
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
24
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
119
**³±
##
100
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
794
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
60
**
³±
##
33
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
89
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
120
**³±
##
120
**
³±
##83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##32
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
31**
³±
##
142
**
³±
##
158
**
³±
##
165
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
241
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##83
**³±
##36
011801180118
0141
0145
0118
0145
0141
0141
0145
0145
0112
0112
0114
0114
0112
0112
0114
01450141
0141
0145
0145
0141
SEEINSET
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Miles
SEWRPCSource:
MILWAUKEE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT INSET
TRANSIT SERVICES
RAPID TRANSIT LINE
COMMUTER RAIL LINE & STATION!!
COMMUTER BUS ROUTE & PARK-RIDE
INTERCITY RAIL
STREETCAR LINE
LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE AREA AND PEAK FREQUENCY
ONE DAY ADVANCE-RESERVATION SHARED-RIDE TAXI
EVERY 15 MINUTES OR BETTER
LESS FREQUENT THAN EVERY 15 MINUTES
L A K EM I C H I G A N
Dover
Norway RaymondWaterford
Yorkville
Burlington
Port Washington
Grafton
BelgiumFredonia
Cedarburg
Saukville
Salem
Paris
Somers
Randall
Brighton
Wheatland
Linn
Troy
LyonsGeneva
Sharon
Darien Delavan
Richmond
Walworth
La Grange
Lafayette
Bloomfield
East TroyWhitewater
Sugar Creek Spring Prairie
West Bend
Polk
Erin
Wayne
Barton
Addison Trenton
Jackson
Kewaskum
Hartford
Farmington
Eagle
Merton
Ottawa
Vernon
Lisbon
Waukesha
Delafield
Mukwonago
Oconomowoc
Brookfield
Germantown
Genesee
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
WATERFORD
ROCHESTER
STURTEVANT
BAY
GENOACITY
BLOOMFIELD
SHARON
DARIEN
WILLIAMS
WALWORTH
FONTANA ONGENEVA LAKE
EASTTROY
NEWBURG
SLINGER
JACKSON
GERMANTOWN
KEWASKUM
BELGIUM
FREDONIA
SAUKVILLE
THIENSVILLE
GRAFTON
TWIN
LAKE
LAKE
LAKES
SILVER
PADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELM
LAKE
WALES
EAGLE
NORTH
GROVE
MERTON
SUSSEX
LANNON
BUTLER
PRAIRIE
DOUSMAN
HARTLANDPEWAUKEENASHOTAH
CHENEQUA
BIGBEND
MUKWONAGO
MENOMONEE FALLS
OCONOMOWOC
LAC LABELLE
WEST
BAYSIDE
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
BROWNDEER RIVER
HILLS
CORNERS
BAY
FOX
WHITEFISH
HALES
POINT
RICHFIELD
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SUMMIT
SOMERS
WEST BEND
HARTFORD
LAKEGENEVA
DELAVAN
ELKHORN
WHITEWATER
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLIN
GLENDALE
OAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEK
PORT
MEQUON
CEDARBURG
WASHINGTON
MUSKEGO
WAUKESHA
DELAFIELD
OCONOMOWOC
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
PEWAUKEE
RACINE
BURLINGTON
KENOSHA
W A S H I N G T O N C O .
W A U K E S H A C O . M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
O Z A U K E E C O .
W A L W O R T H C O .
,-94
,-94
,-94
,-43
,-43
,-43
,-94
,-94
,-794
,-894
,-43
,-43
,-43,-894
,-94
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
**
³±
##
60
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
33
**
³±
##
28
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
144
**
³±
##
144
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
175
**³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
24
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
100
**³±
##
181
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
119
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
794
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
60
**
³±
##
33
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
89
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
36
**³±
##
20
**
³±
##
120
**
³±
##
120
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
31**
³±
##
142
**
³±
##
158
**
³±
##
165
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
241
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##83
**
³±
##36
011801180118
0141
0145
0118
0145
0141
0141
0145
0145
0112
0112
0114
0114
0112
0112
0114
01450141
0141
0145
0145
0141
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Miles
SEWRPCSource:
FREEWAY
TO BE COMPLETED BEYOND 2050
COMPLETED PRIOR TO 2018
PLANNED TO BE COMPLETED BETWEEN 2018 AND 2050
Note: New freeway segments are shownas dashed lines.
!
O
!
L A K EM I C H I G A N
Dover
Norway RaymondWaterford
Yorkville
Burlington
Port Washington
Grafton
BelgiumFredonia
Cedarburg
Saukville
Salem
Paris
Somers
Randall
Brighton
Wheatland
Linn
Troy
LyonsGeneva
Sharon
Darien Delavan
Richmond
Walworth
La Grange
Lafayette
Bloomfield
East TroyWhitewater
Sugar Creek Spring Prairie
West Bend
Polk
Erin
Wayne
Barton
Addison Trenton
Jackson
Kewaskum
Hartford
Farmington
Eagle
Merton
Ottawa
Vernon
Lisbon
Waukesha
Delafield
Mukwonago
Oconomowoc
Brookfield
Germantown
Genesee
BAY
WIND
NORTH
POINT
UNIONGROVE
ELMWOODPARK
WATERFORD
ROCHESTER
STURTEVANT
BAY
GENOACITY
BLOOMFIELD
SHARON
DARIEN
WILLIAMS
WALWORTH
FONTANA ONGENEVA LAKE
EASTTROY
NEWBURG
SLINGER
JACKSON
GERMANTOWN
KEWASKUM
BELGIUM
FREDONIA
SAUKVILLE
THIENSVILLE
GRAFTON
TWIN
LAKE
LAKE
LAKES
SILVER
PADDOCK
PLEASANT
PRAIRIE
ELM
LAKE
WALES
EAGLE
NORTH
GROVE
MERTON
SUSSEX
LANNON
BUTLER
PRAIRIE
DOUSMAN
HARTLANDPEWAUKEENASHOTAH
CHENEQUA
BIGBEND
MUKWONAGO
MENOMONEE FALLS
OCONOMOWOC
LAC LABELLE
WEST
BAYSIDE
GREENDALE
MILWAUKEE
SHOREWOOD
BROWNDEER RIVER
HILLS
CORNERS
BAY
FOX
WHITEFISH
HALES
POINT
RICHFIELD
CALEDONIA
MOUNT PLEASANT
BRISTOL
SUMMIT
SOMERS
WEST BEND
HARTFORD
LAKEGENEVA
DELAVAN
ELKHORN
WHITEWATER
ST.
SOUTH
CUDAHY
FRANCIS
FRANKLIN
GLENDALE
OAK
MILWAUKEE
WAUWATOSA
MILWAUKEE
GREENFIELD
WESTALLIS
CREEK
PORT
MEQUON
CEDARBURG
WASHINGTON
MUSKEGO
WAUKESHA
DELAFIELD
OCONOMOWOC
NEW BERLIN
BROOKFIELD
PEWAUKEE
RACINE
BURLINGTON
KENOSHA
W A S H I N G T O N C O .
W A U K E S H A C O . M I L W A U K E E C O .
K E N O S H A C O .
R A C I N E C O .
O Z A U K E E C O .
W A L W O R T H C O .
**
³±
##
60
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
33
**
³±
##
28
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
144
**
³±
##
144
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
24
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
119
**
³±
##
100
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
794
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
190
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
16
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
38
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
164
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
60
**
³±
##
33
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
57
**
³±
##
167
**
³±
##
181
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
89
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
59
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
36
**
³±
##
20
**
³±
##
120
**
³±
##
120
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
31
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
50
**
³±
##
31**
³±
##
142
**
³±
##
158
**
³±
##
165
**
³±
##
32
**
³±
##
241
**
³±
##
145
**
³±
##
175
**
³±
##
67
**
³±
##
11
**
³±
##
83
**
³±
##
36
011801180118
0141
0145
0118
0145
0141
0141
0145
0145
0112
0112
0114
0114
0112
0112
0114
01450141
0141
0145
0145
0141
,-94
,-94
,-94
,-43
,-43
,-43
,-94
,-94
,-794
,-894
,-43
,-43
,-43,-894
,-94
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
,-41
SEWRPC
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Miles
Source:
ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
FULL FREEWAY INTERCHANGE WHERE AHALF INTERCHANGE CURRENTLY EXISTS
M
NEW FREEWAY INTERCHANGE!
PRESERVE EXISTING CROSS-SECTION
ARTERIAL TO BE WIDENED WITHADDITIONAL TRAFFIC LANES
NEW ARTERIAL
WHAT DOES THE FUNDING IMPACT LOOK LIKE?The impact of insufficient funding for public transit and arterial streets and highways can be seen in the maps on this board. For transit, minimal improvements would be included in the FCTP, and regional service levels are expected to decline by about 10% rather than more than double as VISION 2050 recommends.
For arterial streets and highways, several segments of the regional freeway system and two non-freeway segments would be removed from the FCTP. Specifically, only 35 miles of the total 233 miles of recommended freeway reconstruction would be expected to be implemented by 2050 under the revised FCTP.
Related Documents
