ENGINEERING REPORT FOR TIGER GRANT APPLICATION PROPOSED BERTH 6 EXPANSION PORT OF PORT ARTHUR PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS OCTOBER 2017 PREPARED FOR: PORT OF PORT ARTHUR PREPARED BY: COLLINS ENGINEERS, I NC. 650 I SLINGTON STREET, SUITE 1 PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801 COLLINS PROJECT 15-10615.00
17
Embed
PROPOSED BERTH 6 EXPANSION - portpa.com · engineering report for tiger grant application proposed berth 6 expansion port of port arthur port arthur, texas october 2017 prepared for:
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ENGINEERING REPORT
FOR
TIGER GRANT APPLICATION
PROPOSED BERTH 6 EXPANSION
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR
PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS
OCTOBER 2017
PREPARED FOR:
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR
PREPARED BY:
COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC.
650 ISLINGTON STREET, SUITE 1
PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801
COLLINS PROJECT 15-10615.00
2017 TIGER GRANT APPLICATION
PROPOSE BERTH 6 EXTENSION
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR, PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS
Page | i
October 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part 1 – Statement of Project Components ................................................................................................. 1
Figures Showing the General Layout and Location of Project Components .................................. 4
Part 2 – Feasibility Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 4
Part 3 – Proposed Method of Construction ................................................................................................. 5
Part 4 – Estimate of Useful Life .................................................................................................................... 6
Part 5 – Construction Cost Estimate ............................................................................................................ 6
Part 6 – Required Permits ............................................................................................................................ 6
Part 7 – Estimated Project Schedule ............................................................................................................ 6
Attachment A: Opinion of Construction Cost
Supporting Exhibits
Exhibit A: Project Location Map
Exhibit B: Aerial Imagery – Site Location
Exhibit C: Existing Facilities
Exhibit D: Proposed Improvements Plan
Exhibit E: Proposed Improvements – Wharf Section
Exhibit F: Proposed Improvements – Rendering
2017 TIGER GRANT APPLICATION
PROPOSE BERTH 6 EXTENSION
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR, PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS
Page | 1
October 2017
The following provides an overview of the proposed Berth 6 Expansion Project at the Port of Port Arthur
(POPA) in Port Arthur, Texas.
PART 1 - STATEMENT OF PROJECT COMPONENTS
The Berth 6 Expansion Project creates a new berth with associated backland improvements to increase
the Port’s capacity and operational efficiencies. The project includes extending the southwest limit of the
Berth 5 wharf 1,000 linear feet to create Berth 6. Similar to the existing Port structures, the Berth 6
Expansion Project includes a pile-supported wharf; a tied-back bulkhead; and a backland concrete slab.
Modification and expansion of the existing rail system will provide direct connection between the existing
rail spur and the dock tracks at Berth 5 and Berth 6. The 62-foot wide Berth 6 wharf extension maintains
the bulkhead alignment and the berthing face along Berth 5 with similar mooring hardware, fender
system, utilities, and miscellaneous appurtenances for supporting vessel and facility operations. The wharf
expansion will serve as a general-purpose berth primarily used for cargo and bulk material transport.
To create the actual berth, the project includes dredging from the terminus of Berth 5 to the southerly
limits of the proposed Berth 6. Riprap and articulated concrete mat armoring will protect the limits of the
berth.
EXISTING FACILITY
The Port of Port Arthur (POPA) is an active port located on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Sabine-
Neches Waterway with direct waterfront access to a Class 1 rail carrier service and the nation’s freight
highway network. Various classes of vessels call on the port including deep draft tankers, bulkers, break
Currently, the area of the proposed Berth 6 Expansion is an underutilized portion of the Port’s waterfront
and adjacent backland. The shoreline has no marine structure or bank protection. The backland is
vegetated with no specifically dedicated provisions for material handling or storage. However, it does
provide short-term laydown for overflow operations. The proposed Berth 6 Expansion Project increases
the port’s waterfront facility, increases material handling capabilities, and better positions the port for its
continued growth and value as a regional port.
The proposed project complements the existing facilities and seamlessly expands the port’s terminal. The
existing facilities are shown on Exhibits A through C and are summarized in Table 1: Overview of POPA
Waterfront Facilities. The table also includes near-term improvements that are pending a construction
contract award at Berth 5 and the proposed components of the Berth 6 Expansion Project.
Potential project challenges that may delay the Berth 6 Expansion project include regulatory permitting
and completion of the Berth 5 project. In planning the Berth 6 project, POPA had preliminary discussions
with environmental regulators to identify potential concerns. The discussions did not identify any atypical
requirements that would likely be imposed on the project or delay the approvals. With respect to
construction, it is anticipated that the Berth 5 project will be near completion when the Berth 6 project is
let out to bid. However, if the progress of the Berth 5 construction is not as advanced as anticipated, the
Berth 6 project may still commence with backland ground improvements and/or beginning construction
at the southerly limit of the project and working towards the north to Berth 5. This approach is feasible
considering that the bulkhead along Berth 6 will be one of the first components constructed.
2017 TIGER GRANT APPLICATION
PROPOSE BERTH 6 EXTENSION
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR, PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS
Page | 5
October 2017
TABLE 1 – OVERVIEW OF POPA WATERFRONT FACILITIES
TERMINAL
WATERFRONT
COMPONENT
STATUS DESCRIPTION
Berths 1 and 2 Existing 100 foot wide x 1,200 foot long pile supported wharf,
75-ton gantry crane travelway, and 80 foot wide Ro/Ro
dock at the end of Berth 2.
Berths 3, 4, and 5 Existing 62 foot wide x 1,704 foot long pile supported wharf
with a 30 foot wide backland slab to transit sheds,
conveyor system to storage silos, and 75-ton gantry
crane travelway.
Pending (Berth 5)* 62 foot wide x 600 foot long pile supported wharf with
continuation of conveyor system and gantry crane
travelway.
Berth 6
(Proposed)
In design & permitting† 62 foot wide x 1,000 foot long pile supported wharf
with a 100 foot wide backland slab, continuation of
conveyor system, and 45-ton gantry crane travelway.
In planning‡ 100 foot wide backland slab build out with covered
warehouse storage.
Rail System Existing Connection to KCS Railroad. On-site rail lines include 3
wharf tracks along all berths with up to 150 car
capacity, 2 shed tracks with up to 80 car capacity, 6
track storage yard with up to 140 car capacity.
Pending (Berth 5)* Continuation of 3 wharf tracks along Berth 5.
Proposed (Berth 6)† Continuation of 3 wharf tracks along Berth 6 and
reconfigured KCS Railroad connection.
* Near-term improvement pending award of construction contract.
† Proposed work addressed by this TIGER Grant Application.
‡ Planning project for potential expansion beyond the proposed work addressed by this TIGER Grant
application.
PART 3 - PROPOSED METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION
The Berth 6 Expansion construction project will be let out as a single contract for competitive bidding by
qualified marine contractors. No portion of the work associated with this TIGER Grant Application will be
by design/build, construction management at risk, or by the applicant’s own forces. The construction bid
documents will encourage bidding by marine contractors and marine contractor teams with certifications
for Minority Owned Businesses (MBE), Women Owned Businesses (WBE), Small Disadvantaged Businesses
(SDB), and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE). As grantee, POPA will comply with purchasing and
labor requirements as applicable.
2017 TIGER GRANT APPLICATION
PROPOSE BERTH 6 EXTENSION
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR, PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS
Page | 6
October 2017
PART 4 - ESTIMATE OF USEFUL LIFE
The proposed Berth 6 marine structures will have an anticipated service life of 50 years based on industry
standards for waterfront structures in the marine environment. This service life will be attained by sizing
structural members for load scenarios consistent with long-term uses of the facility and for a corrosion
allowance, incorporating corrosion protection measures, and completing routine maintenance. The POPA
facility as it functions today has no foreseeable end of lifespan as the operations are continuously evolving
to meet industry needs. As such, it is likely that topside features and appurtenances at Berth 6 will be
modified or upgraded throughout the berth’s service life to maximum the use of the facility.
PART 5 - CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
A detailed construction cost estimate for the proposed work is included as Attachment A.
PART 6 - REQUIRED PERMITS
Based on pre-project discussions with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and similar to the recent
permitting for the Berth 5 project, the Proposed Berth 6 Project will require the following permits.
• Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Section 401 Clean Water Act certification
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Clean Water Act Individual Permit
• City of Port Arthur Building Permit
Concurrent with the above regulatory applications and review process, an Environmental Assessment for
review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) will be submitted for compliance with the
TIGER Grant requirements. NEPA review is not anticipated to affect the permitting timeline or project
schedule.
Because the Berth 5 construction will begin before the Berth 6 project, POPA has advanced pre-
coordination with the regulatory agencies with respect to the Berth 6. These discussions have included
evaluation of advantageous approaches to integrate supplemental mitigation measures for Berth 6 into
the approved mitigation associated with the Berth 5 project.
PART 7 – ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE
The Berth 6 Expansion design, permitting, and construction are anticipated to extend over 36 months as
follows:
Design and Permitting: ........................................................ 16 Months (currently underway)
Solicitation of Bids: .............................................................. 2 Months
Construction Period: ............................................................ 18 Months
2017 TIGER GRANT APPLICATION
PROPOSE BERTH 6 EXTENSION
PORT OF PORT ARTHUR, PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS
Attachment A
October 2017
ATTACHMENT A
OPINION OF CONSTRUCTION COST
Collins Engineers Inc. 2017 TIGER Grant Application
Proposed Berth 6 Expansion
Port of Port Arthur, Port Arthur, Texas
Budgetary Cost Estimate
October 2017
Item DescriptionAmount
(Roundup to $1,000)
1 General $1,540,000
2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention $40,000
3 Demolition -Civil $100,000
4 General Civil $825,000
5 Dredging $1,700,000
6 Slope Protection $3,050,000
7 Potable Water $95,000
8 Fire Protection $160,000
9 Demolition - Drainage $50,000
10 On Site Drainage $635,000
11 Wharf Drainage $225,000
12 Demolition- Structural $250,000
13 Foundation Piling $10,690,000
14 Combiwall $9,330,000
15 Deadman $6,200,000
16 Tierods $800,000
17 CIP Concrete $9,000,000
18 Bollards & Fenders $700,000
19 Rail $390,000
20 Ground Improvement $2,500,000
21 Slab on Grade (100-ft wide) $2,050,000
22 Cathodic Protection $390,000
23 Electrical $1,400,000
$52,120,000
$2,610,000
$54,730,000
$55,000,000
Subtotal
Total
5% Contingency
Say
* Individual line item cost estimates are order of magnitude estimates with respect to the total project cost estimate. Individual line item cost estimates may differ from those indicated. CEI's cost
opinion is based on our experience, the experience of others, past bid documents, other sources of readily available information. Because CEI does not control when the work will take place or
fluctuations in labor and material costs, actual costs may vary and could be significantly more, or less, than shown.