P P r r o o p p o o s s e e d d AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation Public Workshop Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation Proposed AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation Public Workshop California Air Resources Board Office of Climate Change April 20, 2009 Sacramento
50
Embed
Proposed AB 32 Cost of Proposed Implementation Fee Regulation · 4/20/2009 · • Loan repayment required in 07/08 and 08/09 Budgets • Collected revenues shall be used to administer
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PPrrooppoosseedd AB 32 Cost ofImplementation Fee Regulation
Public Workshop
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Proposed AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation
Public Workshop California Air Resources Board
Office of Climate Change April 20, 2009
Sacramento
Workshop Documents
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Workshop Documents
• Slide Presentation • Proposed AB 32 Cost of Implementation
Fee Regulation and Proposed Amendment to the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation
• Fee Expenditure Background Document
2
Introduction
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Introduction
Workshop Objectives – Provide updated timeline – Discuss changes to the proposed Fee
Regulation – Discuss amendment to the Mandatory
Reporting Regulation – Provide information on Fee expenditure
3
Updated Timeline
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Updated Timeline April 24, 2009 3rd Workshop Comment Period Ends
May 8, 2009 Initial Statement of Reasons Published
June 25/26, 2009 ARB Board Hearing
Summer/Fall 2009 Final regulatory package submitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL)
December 2009 Affected Entities report 2008 emissions to ARB
January 2010 Fee Determination Notice sent to Affected Entities
March 2010 Affected Entities remit fee to ARB 4
5
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Overview of the Fee Regulation
Fee Background
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Fee Background
• Authorized by AB 32, HSC section 38597 • Included in Scoping Plan/approved by Board • Loan repayment required in 07/08 and 08/09
Budgets • Collected revenues shall be used to administer
and implement AB 32 – ARB and other State agencies – Support Scoping Plan – Repay start-up loans for ARB and Cal/EPA – Funding to be secured beginning with 09/10 Budget
• Direct, non-combustion related, CO2 emissions from clinker manufacturing
Affected Entities
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Affected Entities
Imported Electricity
• Retail providers & marketers • Fee assessed at the first point of delivery in
California
For Fee Regulation only
15
AAff ffeecctteedd EEnntt ii tt iieess
Coal Combustion
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Affected Entities
Coal Combustion Entities using coal as a fuel and subject to ARB’s Mandatory Reporting Regulation
• Cement manufacturers
• Cogeneration facilities • Others
16
Other Emissions
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Other Emissions
• Emissions not covered by Fee Regulation (15%)
• High Global Warming Potential Gases (3%) – Separate regulation being pursued
• Other GHG sources (12%) – Non-CO2 Agricultural processes
– Forest sector – Other fuels
e.g. Aviation gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene and biodiesel 17
18
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Entity-Specific Reporting Requirements
Reporting Requirements
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Reporting Requirements
Natural Gas • Public utility gas corporations
– Therms of NG delivered to end users at the meter • Interstate and intrastate pipelines
– Therms of NG gas delivered directly to end users at the meter
• Natural Gas producers consuming gas produced on-site and subject to ARB’s mandatory reporting regulation – Therms of NG produced on-site that are consumed on-site
• Producers that consume “associated gas” and are subject to ARB’s mandatory reporting regulation – Emissions resulting from combustion of associated gas
19
Reporting Requirements
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Reporting Requirements
Producers and Importers of Transportation Fuel • Gallons of California gasoline, CARBOB, and Ca
diesel supplied for use in California
Refineries • GHG emissions that result from the refining
processDirect process emissions from the steam methane reforming process
• Combustion emissions from refining process by-products from:
Catalyst and petroleum coke Refinery gas 20
Reporting Requirements
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Reporting Requirements
Cement Manufacturing • Direct CO2 emissions from clinker manufacturing
Imported Electricity • Based on MWh from each affected entity,
reported per Mandatory Reporting regulation
Coal • Tons of coal and the associated grade of coal
combusted
21
Reporting Requirements
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Reporting Requirements
Additional Requirement – Required use of ARB’s Online Greenhouse
Gas Reporting Tool – Tool will be modified to facilitate use with
the Fee Regulation
22
23
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Fee Calculations
Fee Calculation
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Fee Calculation
Common Carbon Cost (CCC) – Annual cost of the program (current fiscal
Summer 2012 New Budget Approved � CalEPA issues “Approved AB 32 Crosscut Budget Summary,” �RR 2012/2013 based on Budget Summary 40
State Agency Costs for FY 09 10Preliminary
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
-State Agency Costs for FY 09-10Preliminary
Agency Positions Funding ($millions)
Calif. Environmental Protection Agency 6.0 1.8
Calif. Air Resources Board 155.0 33.1
Integrated Waste Management Board 7.0 1.6
Calif. Energy Commission 4.75 0.6
Department of Food and Agriculture 1.9 0.5
Department of General Services 2.0 1.4
TOTAL 176.65 39
41
Year 1 3 CostsPreliminary
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
-Year 1-3 CostsPreliminary
AB 32 Implementation Costs 2007/2008 – 2009/2010
Fiscal Year Program Cost ($ millions)
2007/2008 24
2008/2009 32
2009/2010 39
Total 95
42
Breakdown of Start up Costs
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
-Breakdown of Start-up Costs
2007/2008 Fiscal Year $8.5 Million Air Pollution Control Fund $15.7 Million Loan from Motor Vehicle Account (ARB) $300,000 Loan from Motor Vehicle Account (Cal/EPA)
2008/2009 Fiscal Year $32 Million Loan from Beverage Container Recovery Fund
(ARB and Cal/EPA)
2009/2010 Fiscal Year $35 Million Budgeted Loan from Beverage Container
Recovery Fund-Do not anticipate using
43
Loan Repayment Schedule
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Loan Repayment Schedule
Payment Due Estimated amount due including interest
(millions)
June 30, 2010 $ 14.8 (MVA only)
June 30, 2011 $ 15.1 (MVA and BCRF)
June 30, 2012 $ 14.8 (MVA and BCRF)
June 30, 2013 $ 13.7 (BCRF only)
44
Total Revenue Required FY 09 10Preliminary
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
-Total Revenue Required FY 09-10Preliminary
• Total Revenue Required - $54 million – Program Costs - $39 million
– Debt Repayment - $15 million
45
Sector Specific Fee Estimates FY 09 10- -Preliminary based on TRR $54M
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Sector-Specific Fee Estimates FY 09-10 =Preliminary based on TRR=$54M
Emissions Source Emissions
(Million MTCO 2E) Estimated Fee
(Million)
Share of Costs by Emissions Source
(%)
Refinery Process Emissions 33.9 $4.3 8.2
Gasoline 143.4 $19.2 34.8
Diesel 42.8 $5.6 10.4
Natural Gas 124.5 $16.1 30.2
Associated Gas 3.2 $0.4 0.8
Cement 8.4 $1.1 2.0
Non-Cement Coal Use 5.7 $0.7 1.4
Electricity Imports 49.6 $6.6 12.1
Total 411.7 $54.0 100.0
Note: Emissions data from 2006 ARB Emissions Inventory, all other entries based on ARB calculations.
46
Costs per Unit ProductPreliminary
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Costs per Unit Product Preliminary
2009/2010 Pass Through
Product 2009/2010 Program Costs
Program Cost + Loan Repayment
Natural Gas ($/therm) 0.0005 0.0007
Gasoline & Diesel ($/gallon)
0.001 0.0014
Cement Manufacturers ($/ton)
0.05 0.07
Imported Electricity ($/MWh)
0.05 0.07
Coal ($/short ton) 0.20 0.28
Approximate Cost per Californian
$1.00 $1.50 47
Preliminary Costs and Fee Estimates
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Preliminary Costs and Fee Estimates
ARB Process for Determining Expenses
• Approved BCPs – Salaries and staff benefits – Operating expenses and equipment – Other costs
• Contracts
48
Questions or Comments?
Proposed AB 32 Fee Regulation
Questions or Comments?
Jon Costantino, Manager Climate Change Planning Section [email protected]