Proposals till week11

Resulted from the fact that the project is deprived from ad-equate technique application and site-specificity. Several more experiments happened at site to sort out the prob-lem. The interesting and signatural structure of the site ceil-ing is very strong and preferred to be utilised.

The experiments at side was accompanied with a series of finding and solving technique problems such as not enough projectors, lack of extension cables, too much nat-ural light (direction of projectors), small image projected (short-lens projectors or mirrors), etc. Several satisfactory out-comes were made such as artificial light-changing on the pendants, but rejected for not site-specific.

The decision made so far is to project a moving sky that were prerecorded and projected on the void of beams. This lead to the idea of extended screen as the outside pro-jected in and uncomfortable space in a against-logic way.

There will be 2 installations happening on site.

One will be 1 projector projecting pre-recorded video towards the beams at the blackboard side from the window site. The video will be sky moving filmed in a sunny day.

The other one will be two projectos projecting live footages onto the ceilings inbetween two rafters in the middle of the room. The footages will stick with the digital mirroring as raised previously.

The Extended Screensidea of installations

The extension of interior space (doubling)The extension of exterior space (reflecting)

The Logic Spaceidea of a space

The Physical exterior (outside of the space)The Sychological exterior (outside of the mind)

Two Viewsidea of participants

The WatchingThe Watched(Instal. 1: watch the self but can’t see, get watched)(Instal. 2: watch the other, get watched)