Proposal: Illinois Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative The State is posting this proposal for a 30-day public comment period (February 17, 2012 through March 19, 2012) prior to submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for consideration of approval. Please submit your comments by 5 P.M. on March 19, 2012 using the subject line “Dual Capitation Initiative” to the following email address: [email protected]. To seek further input on the proposed demonstration, the State will hold additional stakeholder conferences. The first stakeholder videoconference will be held on February 23, 2012 at 1 P.M at 401 S. Clinton St, 7th Floor in Chicago, or 201 S. Grand Avenue East, 3rd floor in Springfield. See the care coordination website for dial-in information for the February 23, 2012 meeting and for the dates, times, and locations of future stakeholder meetings: http://www2.illinois.gov/hfs/PublicInvolvement/cc/Pages/default.aspx. The State is particularly interested in receiving comments on defining adequate access to care, maintaining continuity of care as beneficiaries are transitioned into the demonstration, and beneficiary protections particularly related to self-direction and long-term services and supports. 1. Executive Summary This draft proposal – to integrate care for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid under one managed care program – is one in a series of initiatives undertaken by the State of Illinois (State) through its Innovations Project. The State’s Innovations Project is in an effort to redesign the health care delivery system to one that is more person-centered with a focus on improved health outcomes, enhanced beneficiary access, and beneficiary safety and to implement IL Public Act 96-1501 1 . Due to the fragmented care dual eligible beneficiaries often receive – Medicare and Medicaid often work at cross purposes and impede care coordination – and the high cost of providing care to this population, the State is focusing efforts on improving care for dual eligible beneficiaries while reducing cost growth through its Innovations Project initiatives. On a national level, dual eligible beneficiaries make up 25 percent and 46 percent of Medicare and Medicaid spending respectively. In contrast, dual eligible beneficiaries only constitute 16 percent and 18 percent of Medicare and Medicaid enrollment respectively. 2 In 2005, combined national average per capita spending totaled $26,185. In Illinois, full dual eligible beneficiaries 4 . ndividuals eligible for Medicare and full Medicaid benefits I 4 IBID 3 beneficiaries. June 2010, page 131. Report to the Congress: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Chapter 5: Coordinating the care of dual eligible Medpac 2 coordination program by January 1, 2015. based care - a risk in to be enrolled administered by the Department of Health Care and Family Services programs edical benefits in all of recipients eligible for comprehensive m requires at least 50 percent 1501 - ct 96 Public A IL 1 3 1
41
Embed
Proposal: Illinois Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative...Proposal: Illinois Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative ... and the ability to change or opt out of plans at any time.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
The State is posting this proposal for a 30-day public comment period (February 17, 2012 through March 19, 2012) prior to submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for consideration of approval. Please submit your comments by 5 P.M. on March 19, 2012 using the subject line “Dual Capitation Initiative” to the following email address: [email protected].
To seek further input on the proposed demonstration, the State will hold additional stakeholder conferences. The first stakeholder videoconference will be held on February 23, 2012 at 1 P.M at 401 S. Clinton St, 7th Floor in Chicago, or 201 S. Grand Avenue East, 3rd floor in Springfield. See the care coordination website for dial-in information for the February 23, 2012 meeting and for the dates, times, and locations of future stakeholder meetings:http://www2.illinois.gov/hfs/PublicInvolvement/cc/Pages/default.aspx.
The State is particularly interested in receiving comments on defining adequate access to care, maintaining continuity of care as beneficiaries are transitioned into the demonstration, andbeneficiary protections particularly related to self-direction and long-term services and supports.
1. Executive Summary
This draft proposal – to integrate care for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid under one managed care program – is one in a series of initiatives undertaken by the State of Illinois (State) through its Innovations Project.
The State’s Innovations Project is in an effort to redesign the health care delivery system to one that is more person-centered with a focus on improved health outcomes, enhanced beneficiaryaccess, and beneficiary safety and to implement IL Public Act 96-15011. Due to the fragmented care dual eligible beneficiaries often receive – Medicare and Medicaid often work at cross purposes and impede care coordination – and the high cost of providing care to this population, the State is focusing efforts on improving care for dual eligible beneficiaries while reducing cost growth through its Innovations Project initiatives.
On a national level, dual eligible beneficiaries make up 25 percent and 46 percent of Medicare and Medicaid spending respectively. In contrast, dual eligible beneficiaries only constitute 16 percent and 18 percent of Medicare and Medicaid enrollment respectively.2 In 2005, combined national average per capita spending totaled $26,185. In Illinois, full dual eligible beneficiaries4
.ndividuals eligible for Medicare and full Medicaid benefitsI4IBID3
beneficiaries. June 2010, page 131.Report to the Congress: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Chapter 5: Coordinating the care of dual eligible Medpac2
coordination program by January 1, 2015. based care -a riskin to be enrolledadministered by the Department of Health Care and Family Services programs
edical benefits in all of recipients eligible for comprehensive mrequires at least 50 percent1501 -ct 96Public AIL 1
make up 10.3% of Medicaid full benefit enrollment as of December 31, 2010 and 30.0% of Medicaid calendar year 2010 net claims-based costs.
The IL Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative (demonstration) will integrate Medicare and Medicaid benefits and services to create a unified delivery system that is easier for beneficiaries to navigate. In addition, integrated financing streams will help to improve care delivery and coordination by eliminating conflicting incentives between Medicare and Medicaid that encourage cost shifting, reduce beneficiary access to high-quality care and community-based services, and result in a lack of care management for chronic conditions. The State and CMS will contract with managed care entities (Plans) that will be accountable for the care delivered to dual eligible beneficiaries including robust care coordination efforts where performance will be measured and payment will be tied to quality measurement goals. The demonstration will ensure access to all Medicare and Medicaid benefits and comprehensive services that address the Enrollees’ full range of needs. The State is proposing to exclude the Adults with Developmental Disabilities home and community based (HCBS) waiver services from the demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase-in these services at a later date in order to assure extended stakeholder input and consistency with the Integrated Care Program (ICP). Care will be delivered in a team-based setting with integrated care coordination and care management services based on the needs and goals of Enrollees.
Enrollment in the demonstration will be voluntary – beneficiaries will have a choice of whether or not to enroll. Beneficiaries who choose to enroll in the demonstration will choose a medical home that will deliver care in a team-based environment with an emphasis on integrated primary and behavioral health services and coordinating care across providers. Enrollment will be supported by clear and accessible information – so that beneficiaries have all necessary information to make the choice to enroll – and facilitated by a neutral enrollment broker.
The State will ensure sufficient beneficiary protections including choice to enroll in the demonstration, choice of providers within the network, opportunities to maintain relationships with existing providers, and the ability to change or opt out of plans at any time. In addition, Plans will be required to implement meaningful consumer input processes in their ongoing operations and measure quality of service and care. The State will also maintain stakeholder meetings throughout the operation of the demonstration to ensure beneficiary satisfaction andquality of care.
With the release of this draft proposal, the State will describe its approach to developing and implementing a Medicare-Medicaid alignment model that will improve care for dual eligible beneficiaries, help the State achieve its goal to implement Public Act 96-1501 by January 1, 2015, and align with Affordable Care Act initiatives. The State proposes to enter into three-year contracts with managed care entities to provide the full array of benefits and supportive services (including pharmacy) afforded individuals under both Medicare and Medicaid5. The proposal uses the State’s experiences implementing the Integrated Care Program (ICP) to develop a
P.stakeholder input and consistency with the ICextendedorder to assure in these services at a later date in -demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase
dults with Developmental Disabilities HCBS waiver services from the The State is proposing to exclude the A5
2
managed care program that will improve the quality of care delivered to dual eligible beneficiaries.
Implemented in 2011, the ICP is a managed care program for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities (excluding dual eligible beneficiaries) in the IL counties of Cook, DuPage, Lake, Kankakee, Will and Kane, where local primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, nursing homes, and other providers collaborate as a team to organize care around the needs of the beneficiary in order to achieve improvements in health. Highlights of ICP include:
o Better coordination of care, as members work with a team of providers to give them the best possible healthcare;
o Opportunity for beneficiary involvement in all healthcare decisions; ando Additional programs and services to help them live a more independent and
healthy life.
Overview: IL Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative
The State is anticipating implementing a program similar to the ICP for dual eligible beneficiaries. This program will combine Medicare and Medicaid funding under a blended capitation payment to provide integrated, comprehensive care to full-benefit dual eligible beneficiaries ages 21 and over. The chosen Plans will be responsible for providing all medical, behavioral health, pharmacy, and long-term services and supports (LTSS) for Enrollees. The State is proposing to exclude the Adults with Developmental Disabilities HCBS waiver services from the demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase-in these services at a later date in order to assure extended stakeholder input and consistency with the ICP.
Plans must have networks that include providers that act as medical homes and coordinate high-quality, person-centered, planned care and are supported by care teams and the use of health information technology. The program will include unified requirements and administrative processes that – to the extent possible – accommodate both Medicare and Medicaid including network adequacy requirements, outreach and education, marketing, quality measures, and grievances and appeals processes. In addition, the program will include beneficiary protections such as:
o An ability to opt-out of the program at any time;o On-going stakeholder input process at both the State and Plan levels;o Choice of providers within Plan network; ando Emphasis on continuity of care as beneficiaries are transitioned into the program.
The chart below provides a high-level overview of the proposal.
Target Population Full benefit Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees ages21 and over included in the AABD category of assistance and excluding the spend downpopulation in the counties specified below
3
Total Number of Full Benefit Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees Statewide
278,000
Total Number of Beneficiaries Eligible for Demonstration
172,000
Geographic Service Area Plans will propose to serve one or both of the following service areas:
Greater Chicago: Cook, Lake, Kane, DuPage, Will, Kankakee
Summary of Covered Benefits All Medicare (Parts C and D) and Medicaid covered services including long-term care institutional and community-based services and supports. The State is proposing to exclude the Adults with Developmental Disabilities HCBS waiver services from the demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase-in these services at a later date.
Financing Model Fully Capitated Contracts
Summary of Stakeholder Engagement/Input Ongoing Efforts:
Throughout the operation of the demonstration, Plans will be required to have quarterly consumer advisory board meetings and the State will have ongoing, quarterly stakeholder meetings through the Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC), the MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee, the Seniors and Persons with Disabilities (SPD) stakeholder group. These meetings will be available in alternative formats for individuals with disabilities. In addition, the State will contract with an outside entity to conduct an independent evaluation with consumer participation of the demonstration to ensure Plans are meeting the needs of Enrollees and to promote continuous quality improvement.
The State will maintain an email box. Forcomments or concerns regarding the operation of the demonstration. please use the subject line “Dual Capitation Initiative” and the
MAC Meeting 1/19/12; MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee 1/10/12; Long-term Care Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC) 12/16/11;MAC 11/18/11; MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee Meeting 11/15/11;Kickoff Meeting Questions and Answersposted;Innovations Project Kickoff Meeting 10/13/11; Coordinated Care Key Policy Issues June 2011; and13 SPD stakeholder meetings between April 2010 and December 2012.
Proposed Implementation Date(s) January 1, 2013
Overall Vision/Goal
The State envisions a program that overcomes barriers to integration and improves upon and coordinates care for dual eligible beneficiaries who often have complex care needs and whose care is typically uncoordinated between Medicare and Medicaid or within either program. The following describes how the State’s model overcomes the typical barriers to integration of Medicare and Medicaid to ultimately improve the care provided to dual eligible beneficiaries:
Unified Administrative Processes: Currently, dual eligible beneficiaries have to navigate two programs with different yet overlapping benefits, differing eligibility and coverage rules, and separate sets of administrative processes and information notices to beneficiaries. Under the State’s proposed model, the State and CMS will work to create unified administrative processes for beneficiaries including a seamless enrollment and disenrollment process for both programs and a single appeals process. Plans will provide a single Enrollee handbook that educates Enrollees on how to access Medicare and Medicaid services. At the same time, combined and unified administrative processes aim to reduce costs as both programs currently have to operate separate administrative processes for activities such as enrollment.
Improved Care Coordination: Dual eligible beneficiaries often have multiple chronic conditions and/or disabilities that result in high program spending, but whose care is often uncoordinated across the two programs that provide necessary services. Lack of coordination across the two programs may often lead to unmet needs, underutilization of community-based services, and lack of care management for chronic conditions.
The State’s proposal will improve upon the care delivered to dual eligible beneficiaries –who often have considerably varied care coordination needs – by establishing medical homes and person-centered care coordination requirements so that providers are aware of individuals acute and chronic medical, behavioral health, long-term care, and social service needs and the care they receive. The State’s proposal will also increase access to appropriate and cost-effective services through improved utilization of community-based services, when appropriate, and integration of physical and behavioral health services. The demonstration will implement team-based care coordination and care planning that is based on individual need and directed by each Enrollee’s needs, goals, and preferences.
Integration of financing: The current misalignment of funding (separate payment and data collection for Medicare and Medicaid) and reliance on an inefficient fee-for-service (FFS) system further complicates the fragmented relationship between the two programs and exacerbates the effects of lack of care coordination. This financial misalignment may lead to the Medicare and Medicaid programs working in opposition and provides incentives to avoid costs rather than coordinate care. It can also lead to reliance on less appropriate and more costly hospital-based care and institutional LTSS. For example, in the past, States have not been able to share in savings to Medicare for increased Medicaid costs associated with transitioning more dual eligible beneficiaries to community-based care (typically a Medicaid covered service). In addition, States have historically not had access to Medicare data to fully understand dual eligible beneficiary utilization patterns and to implement robust care coordination programs. Integrated financing attempts to overcome these barriers and encourage coordinated care across the two programs.
Under the State’s proposal, Plans will receive a single capitation payment for all covered benefits to eliminate cost shifting incentives between the two programs. In addition, Plans receiving full payment will be linked to meeting annual quality measure targets as an incentive to study beneficiary utilization patterns and to implement the robust care coordination requirements proposed by the State.
Population
Within the selected geographic areas, the population that is eligible for the demonstration is full-benefit dual eligible beneficiaries – those that receive Medicare and full Medicaid benefits – up to 100 percent of the federal poverty level and ages 21 and over. The demonstration population includes individuals in the Aged, Blind and Disabled (AABD) category of assistance only and excludes the spend down population. Individuals enrolled in Home and Community Based (HCBS) waivers are eligible for enrollment in the demonstration. As of December 31, 2010, there were approximately 172,000 individuals in the demonstration population: 151,000 in the Greater Chicago region and 21,000 in the Central Illinois region (78% of the Greater Chicago region individuals reside in Cook county). 57.8 percent of the demonstration population is age 65 or older. The average Medicaid per member per month calendar year 2010 claims-based net costs for the demonstration population was $1,010 compared to $308 for all other full benefit Medicaid beneficiaries in Illinois. There was very little difference in costs between Greater Chicago and Central Illinois.
6
Of the demonstration population, 19 percent received care in an institutional setting and 22 percent received care in a HCBS setting, but contributed approximately 47 percent and 39 percent of total institutional care costs and HCBS costs among all full benefit Medicaid beneficiaries Statewide. Individuals with serious mental illness6 (SMI) constitute 20 percent of the demonstration population and approximately 39 percent of this subpopulation received care in an institutional setting.
Overall Individuals receiving LTSS in
institutional settings
Individuals receiving LTSS in HCBS settings
Overall total 171,736 33,118 37,857
Age 65+ 103,637 23,021
Under Age 65 68,099
Individuals with serious mental 33,722 13,160 5,301
Age 65+ 11,922 7,074
Among
27,622
10,097 10,235
illness
3,128
Under Age 65 21,800 6,086 2,173
dual eligible beneficiaries, care coordination needs vary greatly depending uponconsiderations such as age, health status, whether an individual has a physical or intellectual disability, the incidence and variety of chronic conditions, and whether the individual receives care in an institutional or community setting. As such, the State proposes to implement a demonstration that is sensitive to individual health needs and goals in order to promote person-centered care coordination and planning.
2. Care Model Overview
Proposed Delivery System
Through the implementation of the demonstration, the State expects to improve the quality of care delivered to dual eligible beneficiaries through improved coordination of Medicare and Medicaid covered services and implementation of a medical home and care planning requirements that support individual beneficiary needs. The State plans to solicit proposals and to contract with Plans that will be responsible for the delivery of all covered Medicare and
affective disorder (295.7), delusional disorder -schizophrenia (295.xx), schizophreniform disorder (295.4), schizothe following diagnoses the State used , these statisticsFor purposes of Serious Mental Illness (SMI): 6
7
Medicaid benefits and for the provision of extensive care coordination activities. The State is proposing to exclude the Adults with Developmental Disabilities HCBS waiver services from the demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase-in these services at a later date in order to assure extended stakeholder input and consistency with ICP.
The State proposes to operate the demonstration in two service areas. The Greater Chicago service area will include the following counties: Cook, Lake, Kane, DuPage, Will, and Kankakee. The Central Illinois service area includes the following counties: Knox, Peoria, Tazewell, McLean,
Logan, DeWitt, Sangamon, Macon, Christian, Piatt, Champaign, and Vermilion. The State selected these regions because of the density of the dual eligible population and the existence of a robust medical infrastructure and choice of providers. The State feels that these factors will contribute to the success of this model and allow two completing Plans to be viable. Plans may choose to serve one or both of the defined service areas. Plans must offer to serve the entire defined service area(s) it chooses. During year two of the demonstration, the State is considering expanding into other geographic areas and seeks input on other possible geographic areas that could benefit from the demonstration. In these service areas, the State will seek proposals from Plans that implement and provide assurances that the Plan can manage the demonstration requirements. (The term Plan is used in this proposal to mean managed care organization (MCO)).
Under the proposed demonstration, care delivery will be anchored in a medical home and supported by care teams that are tailored and personalized to meet individual care needs and focused on providing a multidisciplinary approach to care delivery, care coordination, and care management for those with complex needs. Plans will be required to assure the integration of physical and behavioral health services. In addition, Plans will be required to develop and maintain networks that assure access to all necessary services and to maintain relationships with community-based organizations to focus on and ensure independence for individuals with disabilities. See Proposed Benefit Design for more detail.
Enrollment: This is a voluntary demonstration and Enrollees will have the choice of whether or not to participate. The State will implement a unified, passive enrollment process that provides beneficiaries the opportunity to enroll or disenroll from a Plan at any time. Beneficiaries will be provided a choice to enroll and will have the opportunity to choose from at least two Plans in a geographic area or to remain in fee-for-service (FFS). If a beneficiary does not exercise an affirmative choice, they will be auto-assigned to a Plan. Future auto-assignment will be set so that higher performing Plans (according to variables such as quality measurement and consumer satisfaction) are preferred. Poor performing plans will be at risk of suspension of new enrollment. Enrollees will not be locked-in to Plans and will be able to disenroll or transfer Plans on a month-to-month basis at any time during the year. Additionally, Enrollees will not be locked-in to PCPs. Requests to change PCPs will occur within 30 days. The State will work with the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop a single unified enrollment process.
In order to support enrollment decisions, the State will ensure that beneficiaries are educated on Plan benefits and networks, the processes for opting out of the demonstration or changing PCPs, and the unified grievance and appeals processes. The State will focus on developing
8
clear and accessible information (ensuring availability in alternative formats and languages)on available Plans and beneficiary protections (including whether members’ doctors and providers are in Plan networks and the benefits available through Plans). The State understands that beneficiaries may be hesitant to embrace managed care and will work with stakeholders to alleviate concerns and ensure that they have enough information to make an informed choice about enrollment. In order to help facilitate enrollment choices, the State will contract with a neutral enrollment broker to help deliver Plan information and to conduct outreach and education sessions for potential enrollees. To ensure that enrollment information is available and accessible to all potential Enrollees, the State will ensure that auxiliary aids and services are available.
Provider Networks: Plans will be required to establish and maintain a network of providers –either directly or through subcontractual arrangements – that assures access to all Medicaid and Medicare benefits. The networks must include a broad array of providers including PCPs, specialists, behavioral health providers, ancillary providers, hospitals, pharmacists, and providers of LTSS, home care, and other community supports. The right of Enrollees to select their own personal assistance will be preserved and protected. The State plans to ask for a detailed description of Plan networks in the proposal and evaluate each proposal thoroughly to assure adequate access including variety of available providers, after hours availability, geographic location of providers, distance, travel times, and physical accessibility for those with disabilities. In addition, Plans will be required to co-locatephysical and behavioral health and will be asked to describe their approach to co-location in the RFP. For selected health plans, the approach described in the proposal will be negotiated with CMS and the State and will become a contractual requirement.
Learning from our experience in the ICP, the State plans to ensure network adequacy before implementation. In addition, the State expects that Plans will be able to build adequate networks more quickly under the demonstration because Medicaid providers areacknowledging the movement to managed care in IL and some potential Plans will have experience and established networks with Medicare.
Plans will be limited to a number of Enrollees that does not exceed their capacity to provide the full continuum of Medicare and Medicaid benefits covered under the demonstration. Plans must be licensed according to State licensure and solvency requirements. Plans must credential providers in accordance with National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) standards, when applicable, and IL standards, otherwise, and must recredential every three years. Furthermore, Plans providing services under the demonstration must be NCQA accredited within three years of the demonstration effective date.
In addition, Plans will be required to conduct outreach to beneficiaries’ current providers and propose mechanisms for encouraging these providers to enroll in its network to ensure continuity of care; ensure providers in its network will accept new beneficiaries; and ensure network providers are multi-lingual and culturally relevant for the community it proposes to serve. In order to ensure network adequacy, the State will provide files to interested Plans of providers currently used by dual eligible beneficiaries in the demonstration areas. Plans will be asked to demonstrate how its network consists of providers with experience serving
9
various disability types and to describe its relationships with community organizations that focus on recovery and independence for those with disabilities.
o Network Adequacy / Access to Care: Plans will be required to establish and maintain provider networks that at least meet State Medicaid access standards for long-term care services and Medicare access standards for medical services and prescription drugs. In addition the following requirements will be imposed: Plans will be limited to a maximum primary care physician (PCP) to Enrollee
ratio of 1:600; Plans will be required to analyze network adequacy on a quarterly basis and
immediately identify gaps and develop recruitment strategies as necessary. Plans will be required to have contingency plans in case of network inadequacy, a provider contract termination, or insolvency;
PCPs and specialty providers must have a published after-hours telephone numberto ensure access to care; and
Plans will work with providers to comply with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) and to demonstrate the capacity to deliver services in a manner that accommodates special needs.
Outreach and Marketing: The State will develop unified marketing and outreach rules that include both Medicaid and Medicare requirements as appropriate. All Plan marketing materials will require CMS and State prior approval. To ensure effective communication, written documents must be at sixth grade reading level and Plans must offer translated materials and alternative methods of communication such as Braille. The State will contract with a neutral enrollment broker to increase awareness about the demonstration and to inform enrollment choices through avenues such as mailings or print and virtual media and through outreach and education sessions for Potential Enrollees.
Grievances and Appeals Process: The State will develop a unified grievance and appealsprocess. The appeals process will include an exhaustion of the Plan’s internal appealsprocess prior to review by the Medicare-qualified external independent contractor.o Internal appeals processes will be governed by a unified set of requirements for Plans
that incorporate relevant Medicare Advantage, Part D, and Medicaid managed care requirements; and
o The State will develop one document describing this unified process.
Quality Measurement: The State will use quality measures from both Medicaid (ICP) and Medicare to assess Plan performance. See Attachment A for a list of proposed quality measures. The State will work with CMS to jointly determine the measures to be used as pay-for-performance. See Financing and Payment for more details on pay-for-performance.The State will develop a single, comprehensive quality management and consolidated reporting process. We will work with CMS and IL stakeholders to explore additional measures of community integration and beneficiary empowerment.
Performance Improvement: The State along with CMS will require the development of an ongoing quality improvement program including performance improvement projects.
01
Proposed Benefit Design
Following the example of Illinois’ Integrated Care Program for non-Medicare eligible Seniors and Persons with Disabilities on Medicaid, the program will make selected MCOs responsible for providing or arranging to provide all Medicare services in accordance with 42 C.F.R. 422.101(including inpatient, outpatient, hospice, home health, and pharmacy) and all Medicaid services including behavioral health, long-term institutional and community based long term supports.The State is proposing to exclude the Adults with Developmental Disabilities HCBS waiver services from the demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase-in these services at a later date in order to assure extended stakeholder input and consistency with the ICP. (See Attachment B for a list of Medicaid State Plan services available under the demonstration and Attachment C for the HCBS waiver services included in the demonstration). Plans may propose to offer supplemental benefits that exceed those currently provided in either Medicare or Medicaid as long as they are provided under the blended Medicare and Medicaid capitation rate. In addition, Plans will be responsible for coordinating referrals for other non-covered services, such as supportive housing and other social services to maximize opportunities for independence in the community.
The RFP will seek Plans that are capable of operating a care coordination model that is anchored in a medical home, tailored to individual need and takes into account whether an individual has a physical or intellectual disability, and supported by multidisciplinary care teams. Plans will be required to implement care models that are built on Enrollee’s needs and preferences and delivered in a cultural and linguistically appropriate environment.
Medical Homes: Plans must operate networks – from which Enrollees will choose a medical home – that include providers that act as medical homes with a focus on Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), PCP-centered medical groups, and private practice PCP offices. Medical homes will provide evidence-based primary care services, family-centered health promotion, wellness programs, acute illness care, and chronic health condition management. Medical homes – supported by multi-disciplinary care teams and health information technology – will coordinate care across the spectrum of the healthcare system with a particular emphasis on managing transitions between levels of care and coordination between physical and behavioral health. As part of a care team, medical homes will engage in discharge planning, medication management, assuring integration of specialty care, and referrals for behavioral health and community-based resources. The Plans will be required to have a process in place to facilitate medical homes advancing towards NCQA certification.
Care Coordination: Plans will be required to provide care coordination services that ensureeffective linkages and coordination between the medical home and other providers and services, monitor transitions between levels of care, facilitate discharge planning, and provide care management for those identified to have complex needs. Plans will be required to coordinate with HCBS case managers during transition and, where applicable, may contract with HCBS case managers to provide waiver services. Effective care coordination will include the following components:
11
o Information Technology: The State will seek Plans that have technology in place to assist with care coordination that includes a clinical information system to be used to track care delivered outside the medical home (with Enrollee consent). The State will seek Plans that will operate a secure web-based application for Enrollees and providers. The State desires that the web-based Enrollee portal provide information about the Plans and include Enrollee health history and care plans. The web-based secure application for providers should include care plans, claims information, demographics, and lab results and allows for entry by providers at the point of service. Theinformation technology will be used by medical homes, the multidisciplinary care team, and other providers to monitor:
Provider/Enrollee communication; Enrollee profiles including demographics, claims payment information, goals,
care plan adherence, care gap alerts, lab results, etc.; and Inbound and outbound Enrollee contact.
Plans shall ensure the privacy of Enrollee health records and provide for access to such records by Enrollees.
o Health Risk and Behavioral Health Screening and Assessment: Plans must use best efforts to ensure completion of health risk and behavioral health screenings within 90 days after enrollment and complete assessments, identify needs for care management, and develop Enrollee care plans within 120 days after enrollment.
o Care Management: For those identified through the health risk and behavioral health screening as needing care management, a multi-disciplinary care team will work with the Enrollee to develop a care plan and provide care management services. The goals of care management are to ensure the delivery of high quality care; improve health status; enhance coordination across the spectrum of the health care system with particular emphasis on transitions between levels of care; reduce avoidable hospitalizations; and identify opportunities that support recovery and independence in the community.
Multi-disciplinary Care teams: Multi-disciplinary care teams will support medical homes and provide care management for those identified through the health risk and behavioral health assessments as medium or high risk. Teams may include (as appropriate to individual need) an assigned care coordinator, behavioral health professional, the PCP, a community liaison, pharmacist, and specialist. The Enrollee will be provided the opportunity to be an active participant in their care team.
Care coordinators will lead these multidisciplinary teams and will have prescribed caseload limits that vary based on risk-level. The care coordinator will work with the Enrollee and the multi-disciplinary team to develop and maintain the Enrollee’s care plan, to coordinate and maintain critical information sharing among the care team and Enrollee, and to ensure that Enrollees are meaningfully
12
informed about their care options. Plans will ensure that care coordinators are culturally competent and have the training to work with and address the diverse needs of the demonstration population.
Plans must ensure that Enrollees have adequate access to his or her team through methods such as regularly scheduled appointments including face-to-face visits and email and telephone options.
Multi-disciplinary Team Responsibilities include: o Supporting the medical home to coordinate care across the spectrum of the
health care system including managing transitions between levels of care;o Conducting health risk and behavioral health assessments; o Developing care plans based on Enrollee goals; o Monitoring care plans;o Managing and tracking goal attainment, assessments, lab results, and
referrals made by the PCP – to ensure timely transmission of information;o Medication reviews;o Self-management training;o Enrollee health education;o Assuring integration of the following services across settings and with the
medical home: Specialty care Medication management Institutional care Inpatient Emergency room; and
o Identifying available community-based resources and monitoring use of day-to-day of community-based services.
Care Plans: Plans will be required to work with the beneficiary and his or her family and/or caregiver to develop a single comprehensive person-centered Enrollee care plan for each Enrollee stratified through the health risk or behavioral health screening as medium or high-risk or for those Enrollees otherwise identified as needing a care plan. The care plan must incorporate strategies and identifiable goals to address the Enrollee’s needs and preferences. Plans shall use the Enrollee care plan to facilitate monitoring of an Enrollee’s progress toward their goals, and evolving service needs.
The Enrollee, their PCP, other providers, a legal representative, family and/orcaregiver shall be provided the opportunity to collaborate on the development and implementation of the Enrollee care plan. Each Enrollee will be given the opportunity to confirm agreement with the Enrollee care plan.
o Elements of Care Plan: Based on the needs and preferences as identified through the health risk or behavioral health assessment, the care plans should include:
13
Summary of Enrollee’s health history; Enrollee’s goals; Actions, including interventions to be implemented; Progress noting Enrollee’s success; Barriers or obstacles; Timeframes for completing actions; Status of Enrollee’s goals; Crisis plans for an Enrollee with Behavioral Health conditions; Determine need for community resources and non-covered
services; and Include negotiated risk identification and documentation.
o Hospitalist and SNFist programs: Plans will be required to operate hospitalist and SNFist programs. The State will require that Plans have a hospitalist program designed to minimize admissions and length of stay and to ensure adequate discharge planning. Plans will be required to have an adequate network of providers specializing in care for nursing facilities – a SNFist program – to care for the population residing in nursing homes. The SNFist program must include visiting onsite care by the SNFist in the nursing home.
o Other Requirements: In addition to providing the care coordination services outlined above, Plans will be required to assure beneficiary access to quality care including:
Telephone Access: Plans will be required to employ customer service representatives that are culturally competent and sensitive to the population served and to operate a toll-free number for benefits and eligibility information and to file grievances. Plans will also be required to operate 24-hour telephone access for confirmation of eligibility and prior approvals and a Nurse Advice line.
Engagement of Enrollees: Plans will use a multifaceted approach to locate and engage Enrollees and shall capitalize on every Enrollee contact to engage the Enrollee in their own care. For example, Plans will implement a telephonic outreach program to educate and assist Enrollees in accessing services and managing their own care. Calls will be made by Plan staff, or by the nurse advice line, to new Enrollees and to targeted populations such as Enrollees who are identified or enrolled in care management, who have frequent emergency room utilization or who are due or past due for services.
Enrollee Health Education: Plans must offer health education programs that use comprehensive outreach and communication methods to effectively educate Enrollees, their families or caregivers about health conditions and self-care and how to access plan benefits and supports. Plans may offer Enrollee incentive programs to promote personal health responsibility and ownership. The incentives offered by the Plan to eligible Enrollees may include rewards for completing annual preventive health visits; attending a follow-up visit within
14
seven (7) days after discharge of an admission for Mental Illness; and completing other recommended preventive health and chronic health condition screenings.
Additional Benefits or ancillary/supportive services: Plans will be asked to propose additional benefits – within the blended capitation rate – that will help Enrollees stay in or move to the community.
Evidence-based Practices
The State expects Plans to apply well-established evidence-based clinical guidelines promulgated by leading academic and national clinical organizations. Plans will be required to have processes for educating providers on employing evidence-based guidelines and for monitoring providers’ use of evidence-based practices. Plans shall adopt clinical guidelines for chronic conditions including asthma; coronary artery disease; diabetes; behavioral health screening, assessment, and treatment including medication management and PCP follow up; and clinical pharmacy medication review.
In the RFP, Plans will be asked to specify evidence-based practice guidelines it expects to employ that are relevant to the demonstration. Examples include the Coleman or Naylor care transition models, Assertive Case Treatment, and Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment.
Context within Current State Initiatives
This program is one in a series of the State’s initiatives to transform the health care environment in Illinois to one that is more person-centered with a focus on improved health outcomes, enhanced beneficiary access, and beneficiary safety. Within the Innovations Project, the State is focusing on improving the care provided to those with complex needs including dual eligible beneficiaries. The State recently released a solicitation requesting proposals for Care Coordination Entities (CCE)7 / Managed Care Community Networks (MCCN)8 where hospitals, physician groups, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) or social service organizationswould form legal entities to coordinate care across the spectrum of the healthcare system for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities including those dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Their efforts are required to have a particular emphasis on managing transitions between levels of care and coordination between physical and mental health. Full payment is based on meeting specific quality indicators. This spring, the State will implement a similar proposal for children with complex medical needs
Further, implementation of a managed care program for dual eligible beneficiaries helps the State implement the Medicaid reform law of moving 50 percent of beneficiaries from fee-for-service (FFS) to risk-based care coordination by January 1, 2015. In addition, implementation of the demonstration builds upon a recent State initiative to improve care for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities, the Integrated Care Program (ICP). ICP is the State’s managed care program for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities who are not eligible for Medicare, through which Enrollees
the entities will bear risk for all services covered in its contract with the State.–by the solicitation ination requirements required in addition to fulfilling the care coord–will receive a capitation rate because sMCCN8
service system.-for-will receive an enhanced administrative fee to coordinate care in a feesCCE7
15
receive all covered Medicaid services including acute, behavioral health, and long-term care services and supports through managed care. This program, which includes robust care coordination efforts, established a foundation for the development of the IL Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative.
This proposal also fits within expected state plan activity and alignment with Affordable Care Act (ACA) initiatives. The State is planning to submit a SPA to implement the health home option offered through Section 2703 of the ACA, which would fit within this proposed demonstration as far as Plans will be required to manage the care of dual eligible beneficiarieswith chronic conditions through the use of a health home.
In addition, the State operates nine Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waivers, which allow Medicaid enrollees to receive non-traditional services in the community or in their own homes, rather than being placed in an institutional setting. Each HCBS waiver is designed for individuals with similar needs and offers a different set of services. All HCBS waivers will be renewed in calendar year 2012. Plans will be required to coordinate with HCBS case managers during transition and, where applicable, may contract with HCBS case managers to provide waiver services. Four of the nine HCBS waivers the State operates are included in the demonstration. The State is proposing to exclude the Adults with Developmental Disabilities home and community based (HCBS) waiver services from the demonstration at this time. The State is exploring with CMS the option to phase-in these services at a later date in order to assure extended stakeholder input and consistency with the Integrated Care Program (ICP). More information on these can be found in Attachment B (Medicaid Covered Services) and at the following link: http://www.hfs.illinois.gov/hcbswaivers/.
3. Stakeholder Engagement and Beneficiary Protections
Engagement of Stakeholders During Planning Process
The State began stakeholder engagement in the planning of managed care programs for the disabled and elderly populations in April 2010. Since then, the State held 13 planning meetingsspecific to managed care development and engaged stakeholders in topics pertinent to the development of a managed care program including consumer direction, quality outcomes and measurement, care management coordination, enrollment, and provider networks. The State maintains an active stakeholder group whose feedback is relevant to the development of the demonstration. Examples of stakeholder feedback and lessons learned that informed the development of the proposed demonstration include to ensure network adequacy before implementation of the demonstration; to require Plans to work with providers to meet ADA compliance; and to ensure continuity of care as beneficiaries are transitioned into the program.
The State intends to continue stakeholder engagement with additional meetings during the 30-day posting period. The State will specifically engage stakeholders on aspects important to Medicare-Medicaid alignment including enrollment methods and network adequacy.
Furthermore, the State actively engaged stakeholders in the Innovations Project planning processof which the demonstration is a component. In June, the State released its Coordinated Care Key
Policy Issues document through which it solicited stakeholder feedback on developing coordinated care programs. The State received 75 responses to its Coordinated Care Key Policy Issues document, which it used to inform the development of the Innovations Project initiatives, which includes improved care delivery for dual eligible beneficiaries.
After the State developed its framework for the Innovations Project initiatives, it hosted a kick-off meeting in October 2011 that was also available via webinar. The kick-off meeting had over 1,000 participants / webinar subscribers. Based on the information provided during the kick-off meeting, the State received over 100 questions and provided written responses to questions via its website.
In addition, the State holds stakeholder meetings at least quarterly through the MedicaidAdvisory Committee (MAC), the MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee meetings, and the SPD stakeholder group. The State provides updates on the planning and implementation of the Innovations Project initiatives including the proposed demonstration and continues to receive stakeholder feedback on its efforts through the stakeholder meetings and other avenues, including the care coordination website which includes a comment function.
Below is a list of methods the State used to engage stakeholder feedback including stakeholder meetings to date and the release of the Coordinated Care Key Policy Issues document.
Stakeholder Involvement To-Date
o Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC) – 1/19/12;o MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee – 1/10/12;o Long-term Care Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC) – 12/16/11;o MAC – 11/18/11;o MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee – 11/15/11;o Responses to Webinar Questions and Answers; o Innovations Project Kickoff (Webinar) – 10/31/11;o Coordinated Care Key Policy Issues – June 2011; ando 13 SPD stakeholder meetings between April 2010 and December 2012.
Ongoing Stakeholder Engagement
To seek further input on the proposed demonstration, the State will hold additional stakeholder conferences. The first stakeholder videoconference will be held on February 23, 2012 at 1 P.M at 401 S. Clinton St, 7th Floor in Chicago, or 201 S. Grand Avenue East, 3rd floor in Springfield. See the care coordination website for dial-in information for the February 23, 2012 meeting and for the dates, times, and locations of future stakeholder meetings: http://www2.illinois.gov/hfs/PublicInvolvement/cc/Pages/default.aspx.
The State plans to continue active stakeholder involvement in the development, implementation, and operation of the demonstration. The State welcomes ongoing feedback related to the demonstration and has an email address dedicated to receiving comments on an ongoing basis.
All comments, questions, or concerns can be emailed using subject line “Dual Capitation Initiative” to the following email address: [email protected].
In addition to the stakeholder meeting and dedicated email address, the States proposes additional methods for continuing stakeholder involvement throughout the operation of the demonstration:
o Plans will be required to have quarterly consumer advisory board meetings;o The State will have ongoing, quarterly stakeholder meetings to continue to receive
input on the operations and success of the program including through the MAC and the MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee, and the SPD stakeholder group. The State will use this feedback as a means for determining program and contract improvements; and
o The State will make stakeholder meetings available in alternative formats for individuals with disabilities, when requested.
Description of Beneficiary Protections
The State carefully designed the demonstration to ensure adequate beneficiary protection through various methods. In addition, the State invites feedback on ways to continue to improve beneficiary protections under the proposed demonstration. Below highlights the protections that the State plans to include in the demonstration:
Adequate Networks: Plans will be required to establish and maintain provider networks that at least meet State Medicaid access standards for long-term care services and Medicare access standards for medical services and prescription drugs. Where there is overlap in services covered between Medicare and Medicaid, the State and CMS will negotiate and determine the appropriate network adequacy requirements. In addition, Enrollees will have a choice of providers from a broad network of providers including PCPs, behavioral health providers, specialists, ancillary providers, hospitals, pharmacists, and providers of LTSS, home care and other community supports.
Continuity of Care: The program will emphasize continuity of care as Enrollees are transitioned into it. The protections will go beyond the requirements for transition of care in Illinois’ Managed Care Reform and Patient’s Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/25, which can be found at http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/021501340K25.htm). Below lists some of the proposed continuity of care protections for Enrollees:
o In addition to a 180-day period in which Enrollees may maintain a current course of treatment with an out-of-network provider, they will be able to maintain existing PCP arrangements for 180 days and all current providers will be offered Single Case Agreements to continue to care for that Enrollee beyond the 180 days if they remain outside the network;
o All prior approvals for drugs, therapies or other services existing in Medicare or Medicaid at the time of enrollment will be honored for 90 days post enrollment and will
not be terminated at the end of 90 days without advance notice to the Enrollee and transition to other services if needed;
o Plans shall assume responsibility for an Enrollee receiving medical care or treatment as an inpatient in an acute care hospital on the effective date of enrollment; and
o Plans shall assume full responsibility for pre-existing conditions upon effective date of enrollment.
Self-directed care: The right of Enrollees to select their own personal assistance will be preserved and protected. Plans will be contractually required to provide assurances of consumer-direction throughout their care plans and service delivery model. Personal assistance will be guaranteed a fair wage.
Enrollee Rights: Plans must ensure the Enrollee right to:
o Be treated with respect and consideration for their dignity and privacy;o Receive information on available treatment options and alternatives, presented in a
manner appropriate to the their condition and ability to understand;o Participate in decisions regarding their health care, including the right to refuse
treatment;o Be free from any form of restraint or seclusion used as a means of coercion, discipline,
convenience, or retaliation;o Request and receive a copy of their medical records, and to request that they be
amended or corrected; ando Exercise their rights, and that the exercise of those rights will not adversely affect the
way they are treated.
Grievance and Appeals Processes: The State will develop a unified grievance and appeals process. The appeals process will include an exhaustion of the Plan’s internal appeals process prior to review by the Medicare-qualified external independent contractor.
Communication: Plans will be required to meet the following requirements for all communications with Enrollees including but not limited to marketing and outreach materials, basic health plan information, Enrollee health education campaigns, and telephoneaccess and shall meet the following requirements:
o Written documents shall be at a sixth grade reading level; o Plans will offer alternative methods of communication (Braille, sign language, etc.) as
well as translated materials; ando All Enrollee material shall require CMS and State approval prior to use.
19
4. Financing and Payment
Financial Alignment Model
The program will use a full-risk capitation model for the full range of Medicare and Medicaid (both state plan and HCBS waiver) services. Rate cells will be designed to incent plans to provide services in the least restrictive setting. The State will make monthly payments to Plans for the Medicaid portion of the capitation rate. CMS will make monthly payments to Plans for the Medicare portion of the capitation rate including Part D.
Rates for participating Plans will be developed by the State in partnership with CMS based on baseline spending in both programs and anticipated savings that will result from integration and improved care management. The Part D portion of the rate will be based on the standardized national average bid amount and will be risk adjusted in accordance with the rules that apply for all other Part D plans.
Incentive Payment Plan
The State proposes to implement a pay-for-performance structure similar to that in the ICP. The State will withhold a specified percentage from capitated payments on a monthly basis, which Plans will be eligible to receive as an incentive payment for meeting specific quality measure targets. Plans will be required to meet quality measure targets annually in addition to a minimum performance standard to earn incentive payments. Each measure will have an equal share of the incentive payment associated with it.
Below lists the total amounts proposed to be withheld per demonstration year:
o Year One: 1%o Year Two: 1.5%o Year Three: 2%
Quality Measures
In order to compare performance across State initiatives for similar populations, the State plans to measure Plan performance using at a minimum the ICP quality measures. See Attachment Afor a list of the ICP quality measures. The State will work with CMS to add to this list of measures to reflect quality measures appropriate to the population and to meet other federal requirements, as necessary.
In addition, the State will work with CMS to identify quality measures that will be used as pay-for-performance and expects the identified measures will include at least some of the measures included in Attachment A. The State will also work with CMS to identify quality measure baselines and annual targets. This information will be included in the RFP.
20
Payments to Providers
Plans will be asked to propose creative payment plans that encourage a holistic approach to beneficiaries, quality outcomes and evidence-based practice. Plans will be encouraged to propose payment structures for medical homes that include a balanced combination of capitation, fee-for-service and pay-for-performance to encourage care coordination, preventive care and maintenance of chronic conditions, such as bundled payments for episodic specialty care. Safeguards will be in place to ensure full encounter data is received from any capitated entity.
5. Expected Outcomes
State ability to monitor, collect and track data on quality and cost outcome metrics
The Department of Healthcare and Family Services (HFS) has a knowledgeable staff within the Bureau of Managed Care with many years experience monitoring and tracking Medicaid quality and cost data including with the ICP and the State’s voluntary managed care programs. HFS will build upon this experience and infrastructure to develop a quality and cost measurement program and strategy for the Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative. The State is hiring additional personnel in quality, encounter data collection, and data analytics to provide additional capacity to monitor, collect, and track data on quality and cost outcomes in the proposed demonstration.The State has a state-of-the-art data warehouse and is adding analytical tools to allow the State to more fully analyze and track data related to the proposed demonstration.
On an operational level, the ICP quality measures are already programmed in State’s data warehouse, which will help to create a smooth transition when implementing the Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative quality program. Furthermore, the State will require Plans collect and report encounter data using a uniform encounter reporting method to be developed by the State and CMS.
Reporting Measures: As discussed in Financing and Payment, the State will use qualitymeasures from both Medicaid (the State’s ICP) and Medicare to assess Plan performance.See Attachment A for an initial list of proposed measures. The State will jointly develop with CMS a single, comprehensive quality management and consolidated reporting process.Furthermore, the State and CMS will jointly determine quality measure targets.
Performance Improvement: The State along with CMS will require the development of an ongoing quality improvement program including performance improvement projects.
Expected impact of the proposed demonstration on Medicare and Medicaid costs
The State expects an integrated program to result in improved quality of care for dual eligiblebeneficiaries. Through improved care coordination and reduced cost shifting incentives between Medicare and Medicaid, the State’s goal is to ensure access to all Medicare and Medicaid benefits and comprehensive services that address the Enrollees’ full range of needs and improve utilization of appropriate and cost-effective services including community-based services. As such, the State expects:
21
o An increase in the number of beneficiaries participating in and receiving care coordination;
o An increase in the number of health risk and behavioral health screenings;o An increase in the number of beneficiaries with care plans;o Improved access to HCBS waiver and other supportive services;o Reduced hospital readmissions, inappropriate ER utilization, and non-emergency
transportation costs particularly for nursing home residents; ando Improved beneficiary satisfaction.
According to a 2011 CMS report, Illinois is among the highest – sixth highest – in potentially avoidable hospital readmission rates among dual eligible beneficiaries nationally.9 Additionally, according to CMS, Illinois is among the highest in institutional payments and lowest in HCBS spending as a percentage of all long-term care spending.10 Using federal fiscal year (FFY) 2009 data, the CMS analysis indicates that Illinois had the eighth highest level of institutional payments nationally and the third lowest rate nationally of HCBS spending as a percentage of all long-term care spending in the State.11 While this information is not specific to dual eligible beneficiaries, full dual eligible beneficiaries account for approximately 68 among percent of all long-term care (institutional and HCBS) spending in IL Medicaid. Furthermore, according to State estimates, the full dual eligible beneficiaries accounted for approximately 47 percent of all nonemergency medical transportation costs in the State in 2010. These statistics indicate that there is need in IL to improve care delivery for dual eligible beneficiaries and to shift long-term care utilization from institutions to the community, as appropriate.
The federal government contracted with Mercer to perform an analysis of the demonstration and to provide detailed financial Medicare and Medicaid projections over the next three years, including estimates of how much savings are anticipated. Therefore, detailed financial projections and further analysis of cost savings will be provided at a later date.
6. Infrastructure and Implementation
State Infrastructure/Capacity
HFS has a knowledgeable staff within the Bureau of Managed Care with many years experience monitoring the State’s voluntary managed care programs and the ICP. Furthermore, in the last several years, the State implemented a Primary Care Case Management program (PCCM), disease management, and managed care (ICP) program. In addition, the State is hiring personnel in managed care administration including expertise in Medicare to provide additional capacity to monitor contract compliance and otherwise implement the proposed demonstration.
.ram Initial AnnouncementBalancing Incentive Payments ProgPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act Section 10202 State :Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services10
Center for Strategic Planning, Policy and Data Analysis Group Policy Insight Report: Dual Eligibles and 9
22
Expected Use of Contractors
The State will use an External Quality Review Organization (EQRO) to complete readiness reviews, compliance reviews, validate performance measures, validate performance improvement projects, and provide technical assistance as needed. The State is in the process of procuring a new EQRO and the State will include the responsibilities associated with the demonstration in the RFP.
In addition, the Department expects to contract with an outside entity to conduct an independent evaluation of the demonstration similar to that performed by the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) for the ICP.
Overall Implementation Strategy and Anticipated Timeline:
Feb 17 – Mar 19 State posts proposal for 30 days IL
Mar 26 – Apr 24 CMS posts proposal for 30 days CMS
Apr 30 RFP Release IL / CMS
Apr 30SPA (to implement voluntary Medicaid managed care for dual eligible beneficiaries) submitted to CMS
IL
Jun 15 Proposals Due Plans
July 30 SPA approved CMS
July 31 Plan selections announced IL / CMS
July – Sept Readiness Reviews IL / CMS
Aug 1 Hiring program staff complete IL
Sept 20 Contracts signed IL / CMS / Plans
Oct 1 Enrollment materials sent to beneficiariesPlans / Enrollment Broker
Oct 15 – Dec 7 Open Enrollment Plans
Oct 15 – Nov 15 System Changes complete / Testing begins IL
Jan 1, 2013 Enrollment effective date
23
Jan, 2013 and beyondContract monitoring and complianceStakeholder feedback
IL / CMS / Plans
7. Feasibility and Sustainability
Potential barriers/challenges and/or future State actions
None anticipated.
Statutory and/or regulatory changes needed
None needed.
New State funding commitments or contracting processes necessary
None needed.
Scalability of the proposed model and its replicability in other settings/States
The State will test the demonstration in the geographic areas chosen through the RFP process and hopes to determine replicability in other areas of the State through evaluation of program success (e.g. achievement of quality measures goals; cost measurement). To assist in these efforts, the Department expects to contract with an outside entity to conduct an independent evaluation of the demonstration similar to that performed by the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) for the ICP.
8. Additional Documentation (as applicable)
List of State Plan Amendments
The State anticipates submitting the following State Plan Amendments:
To allow dual eligible beneficiaries into voluntary Medicaid managed care; and Health Homes.
24
#
Category Quality MeasureSpecification
Source
1
Behavioral Health Risk Assessment and Follow-up
New Enrollees who completed a behavioral health assessment (BHRA) within 60 days of enrollment. Also measures percent of Enrollees with a positive finding on BHRA who receive follow-up with MH provider within 30 days of assessment
1) Behavioral Screening/ Assessment within 60 days Assessment within 60 days of enrollment
State
2) Behavior Health follow2) Behavior Health follow-up within 30 days of screening
State
2Alcohol and other Drug Dependence Treatment
Enrollees with new episode of alcohol or other drug (AOD) dependence who received initiation and engagement of AOD treatment.
HEDIS®
3 Behavioral Health SupportAppropriate follow-up with any Provider within 30 days after initial BH diagnosis.
State
4
Behavioral Health Support Follow-up after hospitalization for Mental Illness
1) Follow-up in 7 days HEDIS®
2) Follow-up in 30 days HEDIS®
5Care Coordination Influenza Immunization Rate
Enrollees who received at least one influenza immunization annually.
State
6
Dental Utilization Enrollees who receive an annual dental visit
1) Annual Dental Visit –All State
2) Annual Dental Visit – DD only
State
7 Dental ER UtilizationEmergency room visits for Enrollees with dental primary diagnoses.
State
8Diabetes Care
Increased utilization of disease specific therapies. Meet two of numbers 1, 2, and 3 and one of numbers 4 and 5.
1) HbA1c testing 1x per year HEDIS®
of numbers Increased utilization of disease specific therapies.
up with any Provider within 30
Enrollees with new episode of alcohol or other drug
up with MH Also measures percent of Enrollees with a positive assessment (BHRA) within 60 days of enrollment.
behavioral health
25
1) HbA1c testing 1x per year
DD
All
Influenza Immunization
Behavioral Health Support
Behavioral Health Support
Alcohol and other Drug
within 30 days of screening
1) Behavioral Screening/
upBehavioral Health Risk
MeasuresQuality
AAttachment
2) Microalbuminuria testing 1 X per year
HEDIS®
3) Cholesterol testing 1X per year
HEDIS®
4) Statin Therapy 80% of the time
State
5) ACE/ARB 80% of the time
State
6) DD Waiver Program Support
Services for Enrollees in DD Waiver and Enrollees with DD Diagnostic History - HbA1c testing 1x per year
HEDIS®
9
Congestive Heart FailureIncreased utilization of disease specific therapies (meet 2 of 3).
1) ACE/ARB 80% of the time
State
2) Beta Blocker 80% of the time
State
3) Diuretic 80% of the time State
10
Coronary Artery DiseaseIncreased utilization of disease specific therapies (meet 2 of 4).
1) Cholesterol testing 1X per year
HEDIS®
2) Statin Therapy 80% of the time
State
3) ACE/ARB 80% of the time
State
4) Beta Blocker Post MI for 6 months following MI
HEDIS®
11
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Increased utilization of disease specific therapies (meet 2 of 3).
1) Acute COPD Exacerbation w/corticosteroid
HEDIS®
2) History of hospitalizations for COPD with a bronchiodilator medications
HEDIS®
3) Spirometry testing (1 time in last three years)
HEDIS®
HbA1c testing 1x per Services for Enrollees in DD Waiver and Enrollees
SourceSpecification
26
3) Spirometry testing (1 time
bronchiodilator medications
2) History of hospitalizations
1) Acute COPD Exacerbation
4) Beta Blocker Post MI for 6
3) ACE/ARB 80% of the
2) Statin Therapy 80% of the
1) Cholesterol testing 1X per
Coronary Artery Disease
3) Diuretic 80% of the time
2) Beta Blocker 80% of the
1) ACE/ARB 80% of the
Congestive Heart Failure
5) ACE/ARB 80% of the
4) Statin Therapy 80% of the
3) Cholesterol testing 1X per
2) Microalbuminuria testing 1
Quality MeasureCategory
#
12 Ambulatory Care Emergency Department visits per 1,000 Enrollees HEDIS®
1) Waiver Program Support
Services for Population in DD Waiver and Clients with Diagnostic History - Emergency Department Utilization Rate per 1,000
HEDIS®
13Ambulatory Care followAmbulatory Care follow-up after Emergency Department Visit
Follow-up with any Provider within 14 days following Emergency Department visit
State
14Inpatient Utilization-General Hospital/ Acute Care
General Hospital Inpatient Utilization Admits per 1,000 Enrollees
HEDIS®
15 Mental Health UtilizationMental Health services utilization per 1,0000 Enrollees
HEDIS®
16Ambulatory Care FollowAmbulatory Care Follow-up after Inpatient Discharge
Ambulatory care follow-up visit within 14 days of every inpatient discharge
State
17Inpatient Hospital Re-Admission
Inpatient Hospital 30 day readmissions. In addition, Mental Health readmissions reported separately
State
18Long Term Care Residents – Urinary Tract Infection Hospital Admission
Hospital Admissions due to urinary tract infections for LTC Residents
AHRQ
19Long Term Care Residents – Bacterial Pneumonia Hospital Readmission
Hospital Admission due to bacterial pneumonia for LTC Residents
HSAG
20Long Term Care Residents – Prevalence of Pressure Ulcers
LTC Residents that have category/ stage II or greater pressure ulcers.
State
21 Medication ReviewsAnnual monitoring for Enrollees on persistent medications
HEDIS®
22 Medication Reviews
Antidepressant Medication Management - At least 84 days continuous treatment with antidepressant medication during 114 day period following Index Episode Start Date (IESD)
HEDIS®
23 Medication ReviewsAntidepressant Medication Management - At least 180 days continuous treatment with antidepressant medication during 231 day period following IESD
HEDIS®medication during 231 day period following IESD180 days continuous treatment with antidepressant
At least
medication during 114 day period following Index
At least 84
LTC Residents that have category/ stage II or greater
Hospital Admission due to bacterial pneumonia for
Hospital Admissions due to urinary tract infections
Inpatient Hospital 30 day readmissions. In addition,
up visit within 14 days of
General Hospital Inpatient Utilization Admits per
Emergency Department Services for Population in DD Waiver and Clients
SourceSpecification
27
Prevalence of Pressure Long Term Care Residents
Long Term Care Residents
Urinary Tract Infection Long Term Care Residents
Mental Health Utilization
General Hospital/ Acute
Quality MeasureCategory
#
24 Medication ReviewsPercentage of Enrollees diagnosed with schizophrenia who maintain medication adherence at 6 months and 12 months
State
25 Preventive Services Colorectal Cancer Screening HEDIS®
26 Preventive Services Breast Cancer Screening HEDIS®
27 Preventive Services Cervical Cancer Screening HEDIS®
Enrollees who had an annual ambulatory or preventive care visit with Enrollee’s assigned PCP.
State
30
Retention Rate for LTC and HCBS Waiver Enrollees Service in the Community
LTC and HCBS Waiver Enrollees served in the community at the beginning of the year and continued to be served in the community during the year.
Statecommunity at the beginning of the year and continued
preventive care visit with Enrollee’s assigned PCP.
who maintain medication adherence at 6 months and schizophrenia
SourceSpecification
28
Enrollees Service in the
Retention Rate for LTC
Quality MeasureCategory
#
Attachment B12:Medicaid Services
o Advanced Practice Nurse services;oo
Ambulatory Surgical Treatment Center services;
oAnnual adult (over age twenty (20)) dental cleaning;
oAudiology services;
oChiropractic services;
oDental services, including oral surgeons;
oFamily planning services and supplies;
oFQHCs, RHCs and other Encounter rate clinic visits;
oHome health agency visits;
oHospital emergency room visits;
oHospital inpatient services;
oHospital ambulatory services;
;o
Laboratory and x-ray servicesMedical supplies, equipment, prostheses and orthoses, and respiratory equipment and supplies;
o Mental health services provided under the Medicaid Clinic Option or Medicaid Rehabilitation Option;
oo
Nursing Facility services;
oOptical services and supplies;
oOptometrist services;
oPalliative and Hospice services;
oPharmacy Services;
oPhysical, Occupational and Speech Therapy services;
oPhysician services;
oPodiatric services;
oPost-Stabilization Services;
oRenal Dialysis services;
oRespiratory Equipment and Supplies;Subacute alcoholism and substance abuse services pursuant to 89 Ill. Admin. Code Sections 148.340 through 148.390 and 77 Ill. Admin. Code Part 2090; and
o Transportation to secure Covered Services.
payer for many of the services.lan services. For dual eligible beneficiaries, Medicare is the primary PAttachment B lists all Medicaid State
12
29
Attachment C: Home and Community-Based ServicesDoA DHS-DDD
Persons
who are
Elderly
Persons with
Disabilities
Persons with
HIV/AIDS
Persons with
Brain Injury
Adults
with DD*
DOA:
89 Il.Adm.Code 240.1505-1590
Contract with Department on Aging,
Contract requirements,
DD:
59 Il.Adm.Code 120.70Contract with Department on Aging,
Contract requirements,
DRS:
89 Il.Adm.Code 686.100
DOA:
89 Il.Adm.Code 240.1505-1590
DRS:
89 Il.Adm.Code 686.100
DOA:
89 Il.Adm.Code 240.1430
89 Il.Adm.Code 220.605
DD:
Community-based agencies -
Entity under contract with the
Operating Agency that provides
Individual Service and Support
Advocacy.
Services must be provided
personally by a professional
defined in federal regulations as
a Qualified Mental Retardation
Professional.
59 Il.Adm.Code 120.70DRS:
Required to have at least a GED or
CNA as well as experience in
working with individuals with
disabilities, independent living
services, and home care, and a
background in the medical aspects
of disabilities.
Case
Management
(Administrative
Claim)
x x
Adult day service is the direct care and
supervision of adults aged 60 and over in a
community-based setting for the purpose of
providing personal attention; and promoting
social, physical and emotional well-being in a
structured setting.
The DD version of adult day service also
includes transportation.
DOA, DRS
The amount, duration, and scope of
services is based on the service plan and is
included in the service cost
maximum/monthly cost limt.
This service will not be duplicative of other
services in the Waiver.
DD
For participants who chose home-based
supports, this service is included in the
participant’s monthly cost limit.
The annual rate is spread over a State
fiscal year maximum of 1,100 hours for any
combination of day programs.
No more than two units of transportation
shall be provided per MFP participant in a
24 hour period, and shall not include trips to
a physician, shopping, or other
miscellaneous trips.
Case management includes services that
assist participants in gaining access to needed
MFP, waiver and state plan services, as well
as medical, social, educational and other
services, regardless of the funding source for
the services. Responsibilities include
assessment, care plan development and
ongoing monitoring and review.
Adult Day
Service
x xx x x
Adult Day
Service
Transportation
x x x x
Service
DHS-DRS
Definition Standards Service Limits
xxx
DoA:Department on Aging
DHS-DRS: Department of Human Services-Division of Rehabilitation Services
DHS-DDD: Department of Human Services-Division of Developmental Disabilities
*Excluded; the State is exploring a phase-in for these services. 1
Attachment C: Home and Community-Based ServicesDoA DHS-DDD