Created on: 13.01.2009 Strictly confidential — For project use only ! page 1 ELI Workpackage 8-9 (Communication) – Kick-off meeting Created by: Patrizio Antici Proposal for a high- brightness γ source for the ELI-NP facility P. Antici, on behalf of the INFN/Uni. Roma „Sapienza“ team Proposal for a high- brightness γ source for the ELI-NP facility P. Antici Layout, organization, costs and management
24
Embed
Proposal for a high- brightness Proposal for a high ... · Compton scattering / Beam dynamics (sim/theory) Scientific teams Team Assistant Procurement / Communication Human resources
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Created on: 13.01.2009Strictly confidential — For project use only !
P. Antici, on behalf of the INFN/Uni. Roma „Sapienza“ team
Proposal for a high-brightness γ source for the
ELI-NP facility
P. Antici
Layout, organization, costs and management
General Layout
Gun Sec 1+2 Sec 3+4 Sec 5+6
Sec 1+2Quadrupole
Dipole
Accelerating section
Beam dump
Interaction region
Sec 7+8 S 9+10 S 11+12
1.20.8 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.8
~20°
7.5 1 5 5 7.51 1 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.70.7
14 m 28 m 14 m
2.5 m
Gun Sec 1+2 Sec 3+4 Sec 5+6
Sec 1+2Quadrupole
Dipole
Accelerating section
Beam dump
Interaction region
Sec 7+8 S 9+10 S 11+12Sec 7+8 S 9+10 S 11+12
1.20.8 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.8
~20°
7.5 1 5 5 7.51 1 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.7 3.0 0.70.7
14 m 28 m 14 m
2.5 m
The layout is divided in 3 regions:1) Booster (up to 360 MeV)2) Chicane and first interaction region3) Second Linac, up to 720 MeV 4) Second interaction region
(1)
(2)
Linac (injector)
(1)
(2)
Linac (injector)
Infrastructure requirements
The accelerator fitsvery confortablyin the allocated spaces
Some modifications:1) Move the wall
(separate second accelerator)
2) Increase size forrecovery ring linac (size
very small and inconvenient use of space) DAFNE is 15 x 15 and isvery limited
Updates
1. Add an X-band section at the end of the LINAC in order to linearize the phase-space and with that improve the electron beam characteristics and consequently the photon beam fluence
2. Insert a electron recovery ring, already foreseen by the infrastructure (bottom left)
3. Increase laser energy of interaction laser and pulse duration
• Only 1.5 % of the produced electrons scatters and produces photons, and only few of these produces high energy photons.
• Electrons that loose energy will be automatically eliminated in the recirculation
Strategy
The Lisbon Strategy (2000)
•Increase European R & D
•Innovation
•Generate synergies between RI
•Develop a European Research Area
(ERA)
Industry
AcademiaResearch Laboratory
Amplitude (F)Thales (F)
Scandinova (S)
University of Rome„Sapienza“
INFN
Our Approach
No cash-and-carry solution
Triangle of knowledge
Cohesion and excellence(integrate ELI-NP in the landscape of EU-RI)
EU 27
Overview
• TDR• Implementation• Staffing• Training• Scheduling• Costs• Cash-flow• Integration in the landscape of RI
1st Step: TDR
a) Thomson scattering simulations and beam dynamics (Luca Serafini, Massimo Ferrario)
b) Photoinjector laser (Giancarlo Gatti, Andrea Ghigo)
c) LINAC and accelerator structure (Cristina Vaccarezza)
d) Gun, Vacuum and RF-power (Davide Alesini) e) Control system and diagnostics (Giancarlo Di
Pirro) f) Power and magnets (Roberto Boni)g) Infrastructure and CAD (Sandro Tomassini) h) Radiation safety (Adolfo Esposito)i) X-band Upgrade (Bruno Spataro)j) Electron recovery ring (tbd)k) Organization, Financing and Project
Management (Luigi Palumbo, Patrizio Antici)
•Consolidate scientific, technical choices•Finalize organisation and costs•Peer review•Basis for operations
Implementation
• Full-time and part-time personnel working dedicatedly on the project (hands-on experience)
• Use the C-band LINAC @ SPARC as test-bed/training (hands-on) for ELI-NP
• No preassembling (short time, expensive), joint FAT and/or testing at INFN, installation directly on site
• Personnel from Magurele joining the team during the entire lifecycle of the project
• Proposal Personnel goes to Magurele for joint Commissioning and Supervision
2. When able to install of the components on site (estimated June 2014 ?)
3. Arrival of funds/contracts (Mai 2012 ?)4. Contribution of people from Magurele (7-10 people ?)
Extracted fromELI Whitebook
Tentative schedule
Decision Signature
Costs
Major considered costs:1) C-Band Injector (including photocathode laser and Gun)2) C-Band accelerating Sections3) Magnets (Quadrupoles and Dipoles), including supports4) Diagnostics (BPM), vacuum equipment (pumps) and
Timing 5) Interaction laser (for the gamma production)6) Personnel Costs
Costs estimation method
For:1) C-Band Injector (including photocathode laser and Gun)2) C-Band accelerating Sections3) Magnets (Quadrupoles and Dipoles), including supports4) Diagnostics (BPM), vacuum equipment (pumps) and Timing5) Interaction laser
Orders from SPARCQuotations from companies/suppliersUse of Italian procurement lawVAT includedOverheadsExcl. contingency
Costs for Personnel, method
Senior Management and short time consultants/specialists Very experienced scientists (>10 years experience)Experienced scientists (5-10 years experience) Junior scientists (-5 years experience)
Teams of several peopleAligned to European salary gridsHigh personnel efficiency (stringent timeline)Expenses (15 %)Italian contract formLimited time contract
Total: 35-40 people (7-10 from Magurele)
Personnel classified in groups and considering different aspects:
Cash – Flow, assumption
• Personnel costs at T0 (2y (?)+2y contracts) • Procurement after TDR, so only after ~6 month
after project start (T0+6). • Adapted to companies requests (30 % + 30 %
(T+6M) + 30 % FAT + 10%)• Orders optimized with delivery time, pushing
expenses at later stage (12-18 M)• At T+48 the missing budget will be needed in
order to pay-off suppliers.
But evidently: Negociations / Gentlementagreements are possible…