Top Banner
Typography is the strategic use of type to create texture, hierarchy, organization, and clear communication
26

Proportional vs. Monospace

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Benedict Davis

Typography is the strategic use of type to create texture, hierarchy, organization, and clear communication. Proportional vs. Monospace. Serif vs. sans serif. Serif font (Times New Roman) Sans Serif font (Helvetica) For body text Serif best for print Sans serif best for web. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Proportional vs. Monospace

Typography is the strategic use of type to create texture, hierarchy, organization, and clear communication

Page 2: Proportional vs. Monospace

Proportional vs. Monospace

Page 3: Proportional vs. Monospace

Serif vs. sans serif

• Serif font (Times New Roman)

• Sans Serif font (Helvetica)

• For body text– Serif best for print– Sans serif best for web

Page 4: Proportional vs. Monospace

Standard serif and sans serif fonts:

• PC: Times New Roman/Arial• Mac: Times/Helvetica

Page 5: Proportional vs. Monospace

Display Fonts

• Association- have to do with our past experience

• Visual communication—appearance of the font

Page 6: Proportional vs. Monospace

Association

Page 7: Proportional vs. Monospace

Visual Communication

Page 8: Proportional vs. Monospace

Legibility

• Legibility--function of typeface design

• Informal measure of how easy it is to distinguish one letter from another in a particular typeface

Page 9: Proportional vs. Monospace

Readability

• Dependent upon how the typeface is used

• Contrast• Line spacing (leading)• Line length

Page 10: Proportional vs. Monospace

Print vs. web

• Print is a higher resolution medium (>150 dpi)

• Typical screen resolution is 72-96 dpi

• Read slower on computer screen

Page 11: Proportional vs. Monospace

Fonts for the web

• In print you specify • On the web you suggest an

ordered list of fonts

Page 12: Proportional vs. Monospace

Optimized for screen

• Verdana: Sans serif, optimized for reading on screen

• Georgia: Serif typeface used frequently on the web

Page 13: Proportional vs. Monospace

Alignment

• Justified text• Centered text• Right justified text• Left justified text (ragged right)

Page 14: Proportional vs. Monospace

Justified

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Page 15: Proportional vs. Monospace

Centered

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do

eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut

enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea

commodo consequat.

Page 16: Proportional vs. Monospace

Aligned Right

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do

eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut

enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco

laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Page 17: Proportional vs. Monospace

Ragged right

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Page 18: Proportional vs. Monospace

Line length

• Avoid very long lines of text• The eye’s span of acute focus is only

about three inches wide• Designers keep text in columns or

blocks not much larger than that comfortable eye span

• Two columns are easier to read than one wide column—not on web, though

Page 19: Proportional vs. Monospace

Optimal line lengths

• Too short means too much tracking back and forth

• Too long means too hard to find the next line

• Rules of thumb vary. Some say 40-60 characters, some will go as high as 80.

• Web: 65 characters per line

Page 20: Proportional vs. Monospace

Text as graphics

• Create graphic using Photoshop and specifying font—logos, buttons.

• Avoid for body text-load time, search engine issues, maintenance.

Page 21: Proportional vs. Monospace

Typography on the web

• Font tags• CSS Styles• Very limited typefaces are

available• Very little control

Page 22: Proportional vs. Monospace

Font size on the web

• Pixels• Ems• Avoid points• Older browsers - User resize fonts

when specified in ems, not pixels.

Page 23: Proportional vs. Monospace

Readability on the web

• Reading speed is about 25% slower on screen vs. print. (resolution).

• Contrast issues: Black text on white background most readable.

Page 24: Proportional vs. Monospace

Leading (line spacing)

• Default is 1.15x or so• Increase to 1.25 for longer lines or

for effect• CSS line-height property (in pixels

or ems).

Page 25: Proportional vs. Monospace

Emphasizing text

• Bold• Italic• Underlined• Color• ALL CAPS

Page 26: Proportional vs. Monospace

Future

• @font-face property (Web fonts)• Example #1 – Skylark Lounge• Example #2 – Hi*Beams• Google Web Fonts• Example #2 – Midwinter Bluegrass• Purchasing license• Browser support