Top Banner
Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological methods Report from Germany Sebastian Pflugbeil All methods and data belong to the group represented by Hagen Scherb, Helmholtz-Center Muenich-Neuherberg 1
33

Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Mar 21, 2018

Download

Documents

hoangngoc
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional

epidemiological methods

Report from Germany

Sebastian Pflugbeil

All methods and data belong to the group represented by Hagen Scherb, Helmholtz-Center Muenich-Neuherberg

1

Page 2: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Background and Motivation Radiation and Sex Ratio or Sex Odds

Sex Ratio (SR) is the pertinent term for the number of newborn boys divided by the number of newborn girls SR = boys/girls = m/f

The male probability pmale = boys/(girls + boys) = m/(m+f) leads to the more appropriate Sex Odds (SO) SO = pmale/(1- pmale) = boys/girls = SR

Comparing two SO, exposed and unexposed, leads to the obvious and natural measure Sex Odds Ratio SOR = SOexposed/Sounexposed

The inconvenient term “Sex Ratio Ratio” is avoided (in German: Geschlechtsverhältnisverhältnis vs. Geschlechtschancenverhältnis)

Page 3: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Congenital Malformations (Birth Defects)

Definition of a birth defects proportion (rate): number of birth defects : number of total births

3

Page 4: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Trends of male and female congenital malformations

(n=29962) in Bavaria according to quintiles of the annual

exposure dose

0.11 mSv/a 0.16 mSv/a

0.23 mSv/a 0.39 mSv/a

0.65 mSv/a

4

Page 5: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

The increase in congenital malformation rates is proportional to the mean dose

in five exposure quantile classes from 96 Bavarian districts; n = 29961

Boys: 32 % per mSv/a 95% CI [13, 54] p < 0.0001

Girls: 82 % per mSv/a 95% CI [53, 117] p < 0.0001

! 5

Page 6: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Birth proportions of congenital heart malformations ICD9 745.4 (VSD) + 745.5 (ASD), n=2797 in Bavaria

37.2 kBq/m2

4.5 kBq/m2

RR = 1.013, p = 0.0020 per kBq/m2

RR = 1.830, p = 0.0020 per mSv/a

6

Page 7: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Birth proportions of deformities of the skull, face, jawbone, neck, spine, hip joints, long bones of legs, and feet

(ICD9 754.0-754.4, 754.6-754.8, 756.5), n= 3686 in Bavaria

RR = 1.018 p = 0.000036, highly significant, per kBq/m2 of cesium 137 RR = 2.295 p = 0.000036, highly significant, per mSv/a

37.2 kBq/m2

4.5 kBq/m2

7

Page 8: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

odds ratio (OR) for jump in October 1986: OR = 2.26, 95% CL [1.58, 3.23], p-value < 0.0001

Odds ratio (OR) for the jump in October 1986: OR = 2.26, p < 0.0001

Congenital malformations in reproductive organs of boys (ICD9 752.8) in Bavaria

8

Page 9: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Stillbirth

Definition of a stillbirth proportion (rate): number of stillbirths : number of total births

9

Page 10: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Mean cesium 137 deposition density: 4.5 kBq/m2 No significant change point observed

Stillbirth proportions (SBp) for the ten combined, least contaminated districts in Bavaria

10

Page 11: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Mean cesium 137 deposition density: 37.2 kBq/m2 Significant change point in 1987, p = 0.0091

Stillbirth proportions (SBp) for the ten combined, most contaminated districts in Bavaria

11

Page 12: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Mean cesium 137 deposition density: 37.2 kBq/m2 Significant change point in 1987, p = 0.0091

Stillbirth proportions (SBp) for the ten combined, most contaminated districts in Bavaria

+100

12

Page 13: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Stillbirth proportions for Denmark, Bavaria + GDR + West Berlin, Hungary, Iceland, Latvia, Norway, Poland, and Sweden combined, Change-Point (CP) and reduced Change-Point (CPr) models +3240, 95% CI [1973, 4560], p = 0.00000031

Excess stillbirths +3240

Births 19,056,178 Stillbirths 99,943

13

Page 14: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

6.6 µSv 13 µSv

31 µSv 70 µSv

137.9 µSv

Stillbirth proportions in the Finnish exposure quintiles Mean values in May 1986

Increases proportional to the exposure dose observed in 1987 RR per mSv/a: 1.25 95% CI [1.10, 1.42], p = 0.0006 409 excess stillbirths in Finland, 1987-1994 14

Page 15: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Stillbirths and Congenital Malformations

Significant Relative Risk per kBq/m2

1.005 – 1.020

15

Page 16: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Newborn boys : Newborn girls m : f

Sex odds (= m : f) 105 : 100

1.05

16

Page 17: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

17

Trends of changes in the sex odds in 38 European countries – Chernobyl gap

No change in trend seen in USA

Page 18: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Lost children in Europe after Chernobyl 18

Page 19: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Changes in the sex odds (m/f) in Russia after Chernobyl in 1986

(INES 5 level accident in Chernobyl in 1982) 19

Page 20: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Changes in the sex odds (m/f) in Cuba after Chernobyl

Due to Russian food import ?

20

Page 21: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Changes in the sex odds (m/f) in Fukushima Prefecture after March 2011

http://www.mhlw.go.jp/tonkei/list/81-1.html

21

Page 22: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Lost children in Europe and USA after the period of atmospheric atomic bomb tests

22

Page 23: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Interim storage facility for highly radioactive waste near Philippsburg NPP in Germany

It opened in the middle of 2001.

Jump in the sex odds (m/f) in the middle of 2001 – highly significant 23

Page 24: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Jump in the sex odds (m/f) around 30 km from the interim storage facility in Gorleben (Germany)

First delivery of casks : Spring 1995 24

Page 25: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Jump in the sex odds (m/f) in 2000 around 30 km from Centre de Stockage (CdS) de l‘Aube - France

About 1,200 girls missing from areas around 30 km of Gorleben and CdS since 1998.

25

Page 26: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Results in Germany and Switzerland: 32 nuclear facilities (NF)

Update of published results Scherb and Voigt 2011 Kusmierz, Voigt, Scherb 2010

Page 27: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Results in France: 28 nuclear facilities (NF)

Page 28: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Overall results : France (red) Germany + Switzerland (blue)

Baseline for France was adjusted !

Page 29: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

USA

Cuba

France

Germany

Europe

Bavaria

Congenital anomalies

Stillbirths

Sex ratio

Atomic bomb tests

Nuclear facilities

Nuclear research centers

Nuclear waste storage facilities

Nuclear power plants Switzerland

Nuclear accidents

Russia

29

Page 30: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

USA

Cuba

France

Germany

Europe

Bavaria

Congenital anomalies

Stillbirths

Sex ratio

Atomic bomb tests

Nuclear facilities

Nuclear research centers

Nuclear waste storage facilities

Nuclear power plants

Switzerland

Nuclear accidents

30

Page 31: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

USA

Cuba

France

Germany

Europe

Bavaria

Congenital malformations

Stillbirths

Sex ratio, m/f

Atomic bomb tests

Nuclear facilities

Nuclear research centers

Nuclear waste storage facilities

Nuclear power plants

Switzerland

Nuclear accidents

Russia

31

Page 32: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

Dr. Hagen Scherb Institute of Computational Biology Helmholtz-Zentrum München [email protected]

Dr. Sebastian Pflugbeil German Society for Radiation Protection Berlin [email protected]

Thank you for your attention.

32

Page 33: Proof of radiation-induced health effects with ...csrp.jp/wp-content/themes/CSRP2014Ver2/slides/Pflugbeil_E.pdf · Proof of radiation-induced health effects with unconventional epidemiological

German Nuclear Map NPP, in operation NPP, shutdown NPP, decommissioned Interim storage facilities for spent fuel Central interim storage facilities for spent fuel Interim storage facilities for low and medium active waste Storage facilities with problems: ASSE and Morsleben Nuclear factories, in operation Nuclear factories, shutdown Nuclear factories, decommissioned Planned storage facilities: Gorleben and Konrad Research reactors, in operation Research reactors, shutdown Research reactors, decommissioned

www.Atommuellreport.de

33