Top Banner
Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota’s Experience Tammy L. Pust PACER Boardr August 6, 2013
34

Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Feb 18, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Prone Restraint in School:

Minnesota’s Experience

Tammy L. Pust

PACER Boardr

August 6, 2013

Page 2: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

History in Minnesota

1975 – EAHCA/(now IDEA)

passed by US

1987 – “Rule 40” passed

regulating restrictive

procedures in MN-DHS

facilities

1993 – first “behavior

intervention rule” passed to

regulate seclusion/restraint in

MN schools

Page 3: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Some Definitions

“Restrictive Procedures” =

seclusion or physical holds

used in an emergency.

“Seclusion” = child alone;

egress barred

“Physical Holds” = body

contact used to limit

movement to prevent injury.

Page 4: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Recent History

2009 – MN’s behavior intervention rule repealed effective 8/2011 New law prohibited any

restraint that “impaired ability to breathe”

Didn’t use the word “prone restraint” Was prone restraint allowed

or banned?????

Would it be banned at effective date of repeal????

Page 5: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Not Prone Prone

Page 6: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Prone Restraint: Feds “Push” States

1998 Hartford

Currant report

1998 Harvard

Center for Risk

Analysis

2009 GAO report

July 2009 Letter to

the states from

Secretary Duncan,

US DOE

Page 7: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

2012 Efforts in MN

Page 8: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Strengths = Partners

Page 9: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Strengths²

Lots of People Committed to Doing the

Best for Children

Data Collection and Required Reporting

Legal Framework that Already Existed in

State Law

Political Influence of Partners

DHS Litigation Settlement

Page 10: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Weaknesses

New Administration

Time Constraints

Under-developed

relationships with

potential partners

Page 11: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Threats

Lack of Trust

Differing Agendas

Partisan Politics

Economic Realities

Page 12: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Opportunities

Data

Data

Data

Page 13: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

2012 Report and All the Data

http://education.state.mn.us/M

DE/SchSup/SpecEdComp/Co

mplMonitor/

Legislative Report

Summary of every incident

reported

Page 14: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Result: 2012 Legislative Changes

Gains:

Support for PBIS

“Prone” definition

Banned breathing or

communication

impairment and placing

any weight or pressure

on child

No prone if < age 5

Qtrly data reports

Effective date of repeal:

6/2013

“Losses”

Prior medical certification

Required reporting of ALL

restrictive procedures (not

just prone)

Got for 2012

Complete ban on prone

restraint

Page 15: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

The Effort Continued

Legislative Mandate:

statewide plan to reduce

use of all restrictive

procedures, including

prone restraint

Stakeholders specified

PACER represented

Data collection

continued

Page 16: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

What the Data Showed

Page 17: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

All Restrictive Procedures 11-12

Incidents

16,604 holds

5,236 seclusions

21,840 incidents

Students

2,592/127,561 (total sped) = approx. 2%

Averages

physical holds/student = 7.2%

seclusion/student = 6.6%

restrictive procedures/student = 8.4%

Page 18: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Restrictive Procedures – by Age

Page 19: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

All Restrictive Procedures - Gender

Page 20: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Restrictive Procedures - Disability

Page 21: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center
Page 22: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Restrictive Procedures by Race

Page 23: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center
Page 24: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Prone: Reports v. Incidents

Page 25: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Prone: Reports v. Incidents

Page 26: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

7:1 – Male to Female

August 16, 2011 – January 13, 2012 596

January 14, 2012 – April 14, 2012 360

April 15, 2012 – July 14, 2012 462

Page 27: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center
Page 28: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Students\Incidents – by Disability

Page 29: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center
Page 30: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Prone Restraint by Race

Page 31: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

2013 Group Recommendations

Use of Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS)

Increasing Access to School-Linked Mental Health Services

Reduce Barriers to Accessing Day and Residential Treatment

Increase and Dedicate Safe School Levy Funds

Provide Training on Statutory Requirements

Develop Models for Post-Use Debriefing and Oversight Committee

Ensure Adequate Provider Training

Develop and Publish Resources

Define Data-Driven Process for MDE Targeted Technical Assistance

Continue Current Stakeholder Group Efforts

Page 32: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

2013 Legislative Changes

Definition of “emergency”

Definition of “blocking egress” for seclusion

More detail for district oversight committee

Changes to requirements for post-use IEP Team meetings

Holding/seclusion can’t be used for discipline

Extended allowed use of prone restraint until 8/1/2015

Page 33: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Lessons Learned

Be at the table

Build coalitions

Knowledge is power: Get and

publish the data

Do the right thing

Spend necessary political capital

Set limits; Know who you are

sleeping with…

Never ever ever give up. Winston Churchill

Page 34: Prone Restraint in School: Minnesota's Experience - PACER Center

Thanks PACER – for all you do

for kids and families!