Top Banner
Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International
12

Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Dec 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Oswald Matthews
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs

Dr Ute Collier

Global Freshwater Programme

WWF International

Page 2: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Huge potential in developing

world

Multi-purpose nature of many

dams

Indigenous source, doesn’t require energy

imports

Often requires majorresettlement

Major local environmental impacts

Downstream ecosystem and livelihoods impacts

Cumulative impacts ofmultiple dams in a basin

The hydropower dilemma

Page 3: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Rivers at Risk

Page 4: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Dam impacts

© WWF/Ute Collier

Page 5: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Livelihoods at stake

© WWF-Canon/Michèle DÉPRAZ

Page 6: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

The legacy of bad resettlement

Resettlement outcomes

Improved7%

Restored11%

Worse82%

Based on Scudder, 2005

Page 7: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Project example Ermenek dam

• lack of public consultation• severe shortcomings in EIA• lack of options assessment• inadequate mitigation

measures

© WWF Turkey

Page 8: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

A rights and risks approach

WCD Strategic priorities for decision-making

1. Public acceptance

2. Comprehensive options assessment

3. Existing dams

4. Sustaining rivers and livelihoods

5. Entitlements and sharing benefits

6. Compliance

7. Transboundary rivers

Page 9: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Broad support for the WCD decision-making framework

• US Ex-Im• Swiss ERG• Coface• OPIC• HSBC• EU linking directive• IHA sustainability guidelines• Country dialogues – e.g. South Africa, Nepal, Vietnam

Page 10: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Opportunities for improving on WB safeguards

• WB OPs are ‘catch all’, not specific to complex, large hydro projects

• WCD specific attention to downstream impacts, river basin approach, environmental flows

• WCD resettlement recommendations require improvement of living standards, not just compensation

• Resettlement Action Plan written into loan conditions

Page 11: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

Conclusions

• Reputational risk associated with hydro remains large

• ECAs need to demonstrate that there can be ‘good’ hydro project

• WCD decision-making framework widely recognised as best practice

• Should be seen as opportunity, not constraint

Page 12: Promoting Good Practice for Hydropower – a role for ECAs Dr Ute Collier Global Freshwater Programme WWF International.

THANK YOU!

[email protected]

www.panda.org/dams

© WWF-Canon/ Zeb Hogan