Top Banner
Written and compiled by Jay Saker Projects Funded by the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration 2014 – 2015
19

ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

May 16, 2018

Download

Documents

LêHạnh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Written  and  compiled  by  Jay  Saker  

 

 

Projects  Funded  by  the  Bureau  of  Population,  Refugees,  and  Migration  

2014  –  2015    

 

Page 2: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  2  of  19      

Acknowledgements    

Jesuit   Refugee   Service/USA   thanks   the   U.S.   State   Department’s   Bureau   of   Population,  Refugees,   and   Migration   (PRM)   for   its   generous   support   for   refugee   programs   in   Chad,  Ethiopia,  Kenya,  and  Thailand.  PRM  has  funded  JRS  programs  across  the  globe  since  2005.  

 

 

Secondary  education  in  Kounoungou  Refugee  Camp,  Chad.  (Christian  Fuchs  –  

JRS/USA)    

Music  lessons  in  Mai  Aini  Refugee  Camp,  Ethiopia.  (Christian  Fuchs  –  JRS/USA)  

Basic  Counselling  Skills  training  in  Kakuma  Refugee  Camp,  Kenya.  (JRS/USA)  

Urban  asylum  seekers  and  JRS  staff  in  Bangkok,  Thailand.  (JRS/USA)  

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  3  of  19      

Table  of  Contents  

 Chad:  Secondary  Education  for  Sudanese  Refugees  in  Mile,  Kounoungou,  Iridimi,  Am-­‐Nabak,  and  Touloum  Refugee  Camps  ...............................................................................................................  4  

Background  .........................................................................................................................................................  4  

Program  Objectives  .........................................................................................................................................  6  

Accomplishments  .............................................................................................................................................  6  

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  ...................................................................................................................  7  

 

Ethiopia:  Provision  of  Psycho-­‐social  and  Recreational  Services  for  Eritreans  in  Mai  Aini  Refugee  Camp  .............................................................................................................................................................  9  

Background  .........................................................................................................................................................  9  

Program  Objectives  ......................................................................................................................................  10  

Accomplishments  ..........................................................................................................................................  11  

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  ................................................................................................................  11  

 

Kenya:  Kakuma  Social  Services  Program  ...................................................................................................  12  

Background  ......................................................................................................................................................  12  

Program  Objectives  ......................................................................................................................................  13  

Accomplishments  ..........................................................................................................................................  14  

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  ................................................................................................................  15  

 

Thailand:  Bangkok  Urban  Refugee  Assistance  and  Protection  Project  .........................................  17  

Background  ......................................................................................................................................................  17  

Program  Objectives  ......................................................................................................................................  18  

Accomplishments  ..........................................................................................................................................  19  

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  ................................................................................................................  19  

 

 

   

Page 4: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  4  of  19      

Chad  Secondary  Education  for  Sudanese  Refugees  in  Mile,  Kounoungou,  Iridimi,  Am-­‐

Nabak,  and  Touloum  Refugee  Camps  (S-­‐PRMCO-­‐14-­‐CA-­‐1135)  

Country:    Chad  

Locations:  Mile,  Kounoungou,  Iridimi,  Am-­‐Nabak,  and  Touloum  Refugee  Camps  

Program  Dates:  07/01/2014  –  06/30/2015  

PRM  Funding:  $440,685  JRS  Co-­‐Funding:    $0  

Direct  Beneficiaries:    4,965  People  Indirect  Beneficiaries:    113,890  People  

Refugees:    4,965  People  Non-­‐Refugees:    0  People  

 

Background  

The   conflict   in   Darfur   began   in   2003   when   the   Justice   and   Equality   Movement   and   the  Sudan  Liberation  Army  took  up  arms  against  the  Sudanese  government  in  Khartoum.  The  rebels  wanted   a   greater   share   of   political   power   and   demanded   further   development   of  Darfur’s   infrastructure,   which   had   been   greatly   neglected   by   the   central   administration.  The  Sudanese  government  fought  the  rebels  directly  and  with  armed  proxy  forces  –  mostly  Arabic   speaking   pastoral   tribes.   The   government-­‐supported   militias,   known   as   the  Janjaweed,  embarked  on  a  campaign  that  depopulated  large  swaths  of  land.  

The   violence   displaced   farmers   who   were   sympathetic   to   the   anti-­‐government   rebels   –  predominantly  those  from  the  Fur,  Massaleit,  and  Zaghawa  tribes.  Fighting  erupted  among  tribes  competing  for  scarce  resources  and  access  to  land.  In  July  2011,  one  rebel  group,  the  Liberation   and   Justice   Movement,   and   the   Sudanese   government   signed   the   Doha  Document   for   Peace   in   Darfur.   Despite   this   agreement,   insecurity,   limited   economic  opportunity,  and  land  occupation  prevent  many  IDPs  and  refugees  from  returning  home.  

The  crisis  in  Darfur  displaced  nearly  three  million  people.  Refugees  predominantly  fled  to  the  Central  African  Republic   and  Chad.  The   influx  of   refugees   since   the   conflict’s   start   in  2003   led   to   the   establishment   of   twelve   refugee   camps   in   eastern   Chad.   However,   the  environment   in  Chad  was  hardly  a  safe  haven,  as   refugees  still   faced   insecurity,  violence,  and   banditry.   In   2013,   the   refugee   situation   became  worse   as   30,000   new   refugees   fled  Darfur  for  eastern  Chad  because  of  fighting  over  gold  mines;   intertribal  violence  between  the   Salamat   and  Misseriya  was   also   a   cause   of  migration.   UNHCR   opened   a   camp   at   Ab  Gadam  for  these  new  refugees.    

In   December   2014,   UNHCR   reported   that   368,290   Sudanese   refugees   lived   in   Chad,   all  fearful  to  return  home  because  of  the  instability.  

Page 5: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  5  of  19      

Education  in  the  camps  of  eastern  Chad  offers  a  measure  of  protection  for  students,  as  well  as  a  sense  of  normalcy,  dignity,  and  a  hope  for  a  better  future.  JRS  started  operating  in  the  Mile  and  Kounoungou  camps  in  2007,  where  it  offered  training  for  primary  school  teachers.  By   2008,   JRS   had   partnered   with   UNHCR   to   offer   preschool   and   primary   school   in   the  camps.   Like   the  other   camps  of   eastern  Chad,   access   to   primary   education   had  been   generally   guaranteed;   however,  secondary   education   opportunities   for  students   completing   grade   eight   were  limited.  

JRS   recognized   the  gap,   and  by  October  2008   launched   secondary   schools   in  Mile   and   Kounoungou,   supported   by  private   donations   and   the   Scottish  Catholic   International   Aid   Fund.   By  2012,  UNHCR  had  designated  secondary  education   as   a   priority   for   Chad.   The  success   of   primary   education   created   a  growing  student  population,  but  UNHCR  budget   cuts   made   it   difficult   to  adequately   meet   students’   needs.   In  2013,   JRS   assumed   responsibility   for  three   additional   secondary   schools   in  the   camps   Iridimi,   Touloum,   and   Am-­‐Nabak.  JRS  sought  support  from  PRM  so  it   could   continue   to   provide   quality  secondary  education.  

In   2012,   an   additional   challenge   was  introduced:   UNHCR   and   the   Chadian  government   mandated   that   refugee  camp   secondary   schools   would   adopt  the   Chadian   school   curriculum   by   the  2014-­‐2015   school   year,   replacing   the   Sudanese   curriculum.  Their   objective  was   to   begin  integrating   Sudanese   refugees   into   the   national   educational   system,   instruct   students   in  French   and   Chadian   Arabic,   and   increase   opportunities   for   students   to   continue   their  studies  outside   the  camps.  However,   the  refugee  communities  were  resistant   to  adopting  the  Chadian  curriculum,  as  most  still  expect  to  return  to  Sudan,  resulting  in  dissatisfaction  among  refugee  parents  in  Chad.    

   

Image  is  courtesy  of  UNHCR.  JRS  program  sites  are  circled  in  yellow.  

Page 6: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  6  of  19      

Program  Objectives  

In  2014,   JRS   identified   that   there  were  considerable  gaps   in   terms  of   student  attendance  and   performance,   qualified   teachers,   and   the   community’s   level   of   engagement   and   self-­‐reliance   in   the   secondary   schools   of   the   Mile,   Kounoungou,   Iridimi,   Am-­‐Nabak,   and  Touloum  refugee  camps.    

JRS   sought   to   increase   the   number   of   students  enrolled   in   secondary   school.   However,   this  increase  in  students  would  create   intense  demands  on  the  educational  infrastructure  in  place,  requiring  new   teaching   and   learning   materials,   classrooms,  desks,   latrines,   incentives   for   additional   teachers,  and  additional  teacher  training.    

The   JRS   secondary   education   program   planned   to  fill   the   gaps   by   providing   the   students   with   all  necessary   school   supplies,   furnishing   classrooms  with   desks   and   furniture,   paying   for   teacher  incentives,   creating   better   learning   environments,  and  offering  teacher  development  training.  JRS  also  sought  to  teach  students  about  important  life  topics  like   conflict   resolution,   human   rights,   and   the  prevention  of  sexual  and  gender-­‐based  violence  and  HIV/AIDS,  in  order  to  increase  their  resilience  in  the  refugee  camps.    

Because   JRS  seeks   to  empower  and  build   the   capacities  of   refugee  communities,   JRS  also  taught  French  language  classes  and  prepared  students  for  the  Chadian  Baccalaureate  exam,  allowing   students   to   seek   higher   education   and   employment   in   Chad.   Further,   JRS  developed  Associations  of  Parents  of  Students  for  each  school   in  order  to  involve  parents  more   in   the   administration   of   the   schools   and   to   strengthen   their   ownership   of   their  children’s  education.    

 

Accomplishments  

Improved  learning  environments  and  opportunities:    

• 963   students   were   enrolled   in   the   five   secondary   schools,   and   all   received  instruction   with   proper   school   supplies   in   a   safe   and   learning   conducive  environment.  

• Provided  textbooks,  a  school  kit   (three  pens  and  six  notebooks),  and  one  math  kit  (compass  and  ruler)  to  all  enrolled  students.  

• Added  a  nursery  to  each  camp  so  that  the  62  students  who  are  single  mothers  can  attend  school.  

• 639  students  completed  French   language  classes   to  support   their   transition   to   the  Chadian  educational  curriculum.  

“The  secondary  schools  in  Milé  and  Kounoungou   are   now   well  equipped   with   computers,  generators,   desks   for   students,  chairs   for   teachers;   and   the   new  classrooms   in   Milé   have   solar  power.  The  refugees  often  thank  us  for  these  materials.  They  feel  more  self-­‐reliant,   and   it   motivates  teachers   and   students   to   do   their  work  well.”    Jean  Guy  Kwuimi,  Program  Officer  for  JRS/Chad  

Page 7: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  7  of  19      

• 91   students   completed   preparation   courses   for   the   Chadian   Baccalaureate   exam.  These   classes   included   supplementary   instruction   in   physics,   math,   philosophy,  Arabic,  English,  chemistry,  and  life  sciences.  

• 70%  of  students  in  the  Terminale  class  sat  for  the  Chadian  Baccalaureate  exam.  • 130  desks  and  benches  were  purchased  and  distributed  for  the  classrooms.  • 4  cabinets  were  built   for  secondary  school   libraries,  and  English  and  Arabic  books  

were  purchased  for  all  five  camps.  • 3  classrooms  were  rehabilitated,  1  classroom  was  constructed,  and  1  teachers’  room  

was  constructed.  

Provided  teacher  training  and  support:  

• All   65   secondary   school   teachers   received   the   necessary   teaching  materials,   (wall  charts,   sports   equipment,   and   science   equipment),   and   proper   supplies,   (office  equipment,  chalk,  paper).  

• All  teachers  attended  5  training  sessions  focused  on  reinforcing  their  teaching  skills  and   promoting   crosscutting   subjects,   such   as   peace   education   and   HIV/AIDS  prevention.  

• 43  teachers  attended  a  pilot  course  on  the  French  language.  

Increased  parent  involvement  and  ownership  of  the  secondary  schools:  

• 5  Association  of  Parents  of  Students  (APEs)  were  created  for  the  secondary  schools  • A   training   session   was   offered   in   every   camp   on   the   role   of   APEs   and   school  

management.  

 

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  

963   students   enrolled   in   the   secondary   schools,   689   less   than   initially   expected.   The  primary  sources  of  lower  enrollment  were  declining  income,  gender  issues,  early  marriage,  and  curriculum  change.  While  school  fees  have  remained  the  same,  the  economic  standing  of   the   refugees   was   negatively   affected   by   the   cuts   in   monthly   food   distribution   by   the  World  Food  Programme.  Therefore,  families  have  been  less  able  to  pay  for  their  children  to  attend   secondary   schools.   Further,   the   food   cuts   have   increased   malnutrition   among  children  and  young  mothers,  decreasing  attendance.  

In  the  refugee  camps,  girls  still  remain  disproportionately  engaged  in  family  life  by  caring  for   children,   gathering  water,   and   doing   other   household   chores.   Therefore,   girls   have   a  higher  rate  of  absenteeism  and  school  dropout.  In  addition,  many  girls  left  school  because  of   early   marriages.   Therefore,   girls’   attendance   and   performance   in   secondary   school   is  much  lower  in  terms  of  quantity  and  quality  when  compared  to  primary  school.  

For   teachers,   the   lack   of   manuals   in   different   subjects   and   the   difficulty   in   procuring  teachers’  materials  has  created  day-­‐to-­‐day  gaps  that  cannot  be  filled  by  training  alone.  

Page 8: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  8  of  19      

Finally,   in   the  Kounoungou   camp,  water   supply   shortages   have   led   to   delays   in   finishing  work   constructing   and   rehabilitating   classrooms.   This   water   scarcity   also   affected   the  wellbeing  of  secondary  students  attending  classes.  

   

Page 9: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  9  of  19      

Ethiopia  Provision  of  Psycho-­‐social  and  Recreational  Services  for  Eritreans  in  Mai  Aini  

Refugee  Camp  (S-­‐PRMCO-­‐14-­‐CA-­‐1243)  

Country:    Ethiopia  

Locations:    Mai  Aini  Refugee  Camp  

Program  Dates:  08/15/2014  –  08/14/2015  

PRM  Funding:  $159,838  JRS  Co-­‐Funding:  $7,101  

Direct  Beneficiaries:    2,000  People  Indirect  Beneficiaries:    2,000  People  

Refugees:    1900  People  Non-­‐Refugees:    100  People  

 

Background  

In  1993,  after  a  thirty  year  war  for  separation  with  Ethiopia,  Eritrea  gained  independence.  Since  then,  it  has  been  ruled  by  an  authoritarian  regime  which  is  responsible  for  systematic  human   rights   abuses,   including   arbitrary   detention,   domestic   surveillance,   indefinite  military   conscription,   torture,   forced   labor,   severely   limited   free   expression   and   press  freedoms,  religious  persecution,  and  sexual  violence  against  women.  

Five   years   later,   Eritrea   invaded   Ethiopia,   and   the   conflict   that   followed   killed   nearly  100,000   people,   displaced   1.4   million   more,   and   resulted   in   400,000   land   mines   being  placed   in   Eritrea’s  most   fertile   regions.   After   the  war   ended   in   2000,   Eritrean   President  Isaias  Afwerki  consolidated  power,  and  has  established  an  authoritarian  rule  that  has  made  life  unbearable  for  most  in  Eritrea.    

In   Afwerki’s   Eritrea,   national   military   service   is  compulsory.  In  practice,  this  means  indefinite  labor  on   government   owned   farms   and   businesses,  sometimes   extending   several   years   past   the   initial  enlistment   period.   Women   in   the   military   are  frequently   sexually   assaulted   and   abused   by   their  superiors.  Conscripts  face  tremendous  penalties  for  deserting   or   evading   military   service,   including  torture   or   detention   in   overcrowded   prisons.  Eritreans   are   subject   to   arrest   for   criticizing   their  government   or   practicing   an   unapproved   religion.  When   detained,   they   often   live   in   overcrowded  conditions  that  are  exposed  to  the  weather,  and  are  beaten,  tortured,  and  fed  starvation  rations.  

Since  the  conclusion  of  the  1998  Eritrean-­‐Ethiopian  War,  Eritreans  have  been  fleeing  to  Ethiopia  in  large  numbers.   As   of   December   2014,   UNHCR   reports   that   there   are   363,077   refugees   from  Eritrea,  106,670  of  which  have   fled   to  camps   in  Ethiopia.  Seeking  asylum  is  no  easy   task,  

“One   of   the   most   challenging  things  that  the  refugees  face  is  that  need  of  going  back  home.  Hope  (to  return   home)   is   not   yet   visible   in  the   near   future   …   They   have  flashbacks  of  what   they  have   seen  in   their   lives,   the   dear   ones   they  have   seen   being   killed,   the   rape  situations  they  have  (experienced),  and  all  these  situations  are  a  great  challenge.”    Tium  Debesai,  JRS  Psychosocial  Coordinator  in  Melkadida  

Page 10: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  10  of  19    

however,   as   those   who   flee   risk   capture   and   torture   by   the   Eritrean   Defense   Forces   or  exorbitant  fees  from  human  traffickers.    

The  Eritrean  refugees  in  Ethiopia  cannot  return  home,  as  they  face  indefinite  detention  and  abuse.  Therefore,  they  languish  in  Ethiopia,  waiting  for  permanent  resettlement  to  a  third  country.   Camp   life   has   provided   few   creative   outlets,   opportunities   for   education,   or  recreation.   This   has   been   especially   difficult   for   the   young   refugees  who  make   up  more  than  80%  of  the  Eritrean  refugee  population.  They  have  increasingly  turned  to  unhealthy  activities   like   drinking   and   gambling   in   search   of   recreation.   Further,   many   developed  significant  mental   health   problems,   like   loneliness,   depression,   boredom,   and   alienation.  Parents  and  older  refugees  worry  that  younger  refugees  are  losing  their  cultural  identity.  

The  Mai  Aini  refugee  camp  in  northern  Ethiopia,  in  which  JRS  operates,  is  the  second  oldest  camp   in  Ethiopia,   and   is   full   to   capacity.  UNHCR  estimates   that  18,500  Eritrean   refugees  live   there,   of   which   the   majority   are   under   age   24,   and   significant   numbers   are  unaccompanied.  These  refugees  face  limited  opportunities,  and  have  been  frustrated  by  the  inability  to  seek  asylum  in  Europe  and  other  locations.  Increasing  numbers  of  refugees  are  choosing  to  leave  the  camp  for  Europe,  which  carries  high  risks,  including  kidnapping  and  death  at  the  hands  of  human  traffickers.  

   

Program  Objectives  

In  2012,  JRS  began  a  three-­‐year   project   to   increase  recreational   opportunities  for  Eritrean  refugees  in  the  Mai  Aini   camp,   in  order   to  combat   mental   health  issues   and   self-­‐destructive  behaviors.   These   activities  were   intended   to   promote  both   the   mental   and  physical   well-­‐being   of  refugees,   and   today  include   intermural   sports,  sports  skills  and  officiating  classes,   basic   instrumental  and   vocal   music   courses,  music   appreciation   and  theory   classes,   talent  competitions,   dance  lessons,  dramatic  theater  workshops,  and  a  fine  arts  program.  In  addition,  a  camp  library  has  been  administered,  and  new  books  for  this  library  have  been  purchased  

The   program’s   recreation   activities   intended   to   decrease   idleness   and   ensure   that  participants  remain  healthy,  active,  and  productive  while  they  wait  for  a  durable  solution.  

Image  courtesy  of  UNHCR.  JRS  program  sites  are  circled  in  yellow.  

Page 11: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  11  of  19    

In   addition,   it   sought   to   prevent   dangerous   migration   to   Europe,   which   leaves   refugees  vulnerable  to  human  traffickers.    

 

Accomplishments  

Promoted  the  mental  and  physical  well-­‐being  of  refugees  and  the  positive  use  of  their  time:    

• On  average,  130  refugees  used  the  recreational  services  every  day.  • Classes   in   sports   skills  were   provided   to   253   refugees,   (in   soccer,   basketball,   and  

volleyball).  • 4  classes  were  provided  to  train  sports  officiating.  • 138   refugees   completed   basic   keyboard,   guitar,   vocal,   or   traditional   instruments  

classes.  • 137  refugees  completed  a  course  on  music  appreciation  and  music  theory.  • A   year-­‐long   talent   search   competition   was   conducted,   in   which   72   refugees  

competed.  • 4  week-­‐long  traditional  and  modern  dance  classes  were  provided.  • 4  week-­‐long  theater  workshops  were  taught,  two  on  acting  training,  one  on  theater  

directing,  and  one  on  dramatic  performance.  • 10   theater   and   dance   performances   were   conducted;   most   were   centered   on  

important  social  themes,  like  deforestation,  human  trafficking,  and  pre-­‐natal  care.    • 352  books  were  purchased  for  the  camp  library.    • 6,181  refugees  and  host  community  members  used  the  library.    • 62  refugees  participated   in  a   sketching,  drawing,  and  painting  class.  An  exhibition  

was  opened  during  their  graduation.    

 

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  

The  host  community  from  the  nearby  town  has  been  allowed  access  to  library  services  and  sports  games.  This  has  helped  develop  a  closer  relationship  between  the  refugee  and  host  communities,   as   both   groups   have   worked   together   in   workshops,   performances,   and  sports  competitions.    

Activities  relating   to  physical   fitness  had   the  strongest  attendance,  and  participants  were  generally  very  excited   to   learn  new  sports  and   improve   their  skills.  Classes   in   traditional  music   and   dance  were   least   attended,   likely   due   to   refugees   already   being   familiar  with  traditional   arts.   However,   as   promoting   the   refugees’   own   culture   is   important   to   the  objective  of  protecting  mental  health,  JRS  will  continue  to  offer  these  traditional  music  and  dance  classes,  seeking  other  ways  to  increase  participation.  

Refugees  in  different  classes  have  requested  more  performances  to  demonstrate  what  they  have   learned   to   community   members.   Increasing   the   number   of   performances   has   the  added  benefit  of  recruiting  more  participants  in  recreational  classes.    

Page 12: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  12  of  19    

Kenya  Kakuma  Social  Services  Program  (S-­‐PRMCO-­‐14-­‐CA-­‐1268)  

Country:    Kenya  

Locations:    Kakuma  Refugee  Camp  

Program  Dates:    07/15/2014  –  07/14/2015  

PRM  Funding:    $599,387  JRS  Co-­‐Funding:    $125,049  

Direct  Beneficiaries:    15,168  People  Indirect  Beneficiaries:    2,800  People  

Refugees:    17,070  People  Non-­‐Refugees:    898  People  

 

Background  

The  Kakuma  Refugee  Camp  in  northern  Kenya  is  home  to  174,920  refugees  from  twenty-­‐two  different  countries.  It  was  established  in  1992  to  serve  Sudanese  refugees.  Today,  the  most  significant  refugee  populations  in  the  camp  have  fled  from  Somalia  (55,050  refugees)  and  South  Sudan  (91,892  refugees),  and  others  are  from  Burundi,  the  Democratic  Republic  of  Congo,  Eritrea,  Ethiopia,  Rwanda,  Sudan,  and  Uganda.  

Somalia:   Following   the   collapse   of   the   dictatorial   Barre   government   in   1991,   Somalia  entered  a  civil  war  which  continues  today.  For  nearly  fifteen  years,  the  country  was  without  a  legitimate  or  effective  central  government.  War  has  ravaged  the  country’s  infrastructure.  Basic   services  are  non-­‐existent  and   the  population  suffers   from  extremely  high  mortality  and  malnutrition  rates.  Poor  roads  and  insecurity  hamper  the  delivery  of  international  aid.  Al-­‐Shabaab  –  an  Islamic  insurgency  that  has  been  challenging  the  legitimacy  of  the  Federal  Government   of   Somalia   –   controls   the   country’s   south,   and   bans   most   international  humanitarian  assistance.    

Al-­‐Shabaab  has   become   a   destabilizing   force   for   Somalia   and  Kenya.   The   group   executes  terrorist   attacks   inside   Kenya   –   most   notably   the  Westgate   Mall   shooting   in   September  2013   –   which   have   negatively   influenced   Kenyan   attitudes   about   Somalis   inside   their  country.  Because  of  this  deteriorating  relationship,  the  Kenyan  Government  has  enacted  a  policy  that  forces  urban  refugees  to  move  to  refugee  camps  like  Kakuma.  

Due  to  the  Civil  War’s  violence  and  low  standards  of  life  inside  Somalia,  UNHCR  estimates  that   there   are  1.1  million   Somali   IDPs   and   another  1.1  million   Somali   refugees,   of  which  462,970   are   registered   in   Kenya.   In   2014,   UNHCR   facilitated   a   tripartite   agreement  between   itself,   Kenya,   and   the   Federal   Government   of   Somalia   to   begin   the   voluntary  repatriation   of   Somali   refugees   living   in   Kenya.   However,   many   believe   that   the   high  targets  of  repatriation  are  unrealistic  and  will  not  be  achieved.    

South  Sudan:  Historically,  the  Kakuma  refugee  camp  has  been  a  refuge  for  South  Sudanese  fleeing   violence   in   Sudan.   In   2011,   South   Sudan   state   peacefully   declared   independence  from   Sudan.   By   December   2013,   however,   civil   war   broke   out   over   a   political   impasse  between  President  Salva  Kiir  and  former  Vice  President  Reik  Machar,  both  members  of  the  two  largest  ethnic  groups  in  the  new  country.  Both  Kiir  and  Machar  utilized  existing  ethnic  

Page 13: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  13  of  19    

fissures  and  fearmongering  to  mobilize  their  bases  throughout  South  Sudan.  In  addition  to  the  deaths  of  thousands  of  civilians,  the  conflict  has  created  1.4  million  IDPs  and  754,544  refugees.  The   fighting  has  also  resulted   in  widespread  Sexual  and  Gender-­‐Based  Violence  (SBGV)   and   other   human   rights   violations,   including   unlawful   killings,   detainments,   and  arrests.    

Kakuma   Refugee   Camp:   JRS   has  provided   services   in   Kakuma   since  1994.   Even   though   the   population  demographics  have  changed  over  time,  the   needs   have   remained   largely   the  same.   Refugees   arriving   at   Kakuma  have   physical,   material,   and  psychological  issues  that  threaten  their  survival.   JRS   has   specialized   in  providing   psychosocial   support   that  other  NGOs  in  the  camp  do  not  provide.    

 

Program  Objectives  

Due   to   the   large   influx   of   South  Sudanese   refugees   and   the   forced  encampment  of  Somali  urban  refugees,  the   population   of   Kakuma   has  expanded  rapidly  in  the  past  few  years.  These  population  increases  have  led  to  shortfalls   in   the   provision   of  psychosocial   support   to   refugees   and  children,  case  management,  alternative  care   support   for   separated   and  unaccompanied   children,  strengthening   of   community   support  mechanisms,   and   awareness   of   child  rights  and  sexual  abuse.  

Therefore,   in   2012,   JRS   began   a   three-­‐year   project   to   increase   psychosocial   support   for  Sudanese  and  Somali  refugees  in  the  Kakuma  camp.  These  services  include:  individual  and  group  counseling,  training  community  counselors,  a  specialized  facility  for  the  protection  of  women  and  children  from  SGBV,  and  a  mental  health  program  that  teaches  education  and  life  skills  to  refugees  with  developmental  disabilities.  

 

   

Image  courtesy  of  UNHCR.  JRS  program  sites  are  circled  in  yellow.  

Page 14: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  14  of  19    

Accomplishments  

Improved  psychological  well-­‐being  through  mental  health  services  and  training:    

• Refugees   were   trained   in   three   different   levels   of   Basic   Counselling   Skills:   281  graduated  from  level  one,  38  graduated  from  level  two,  and  25  graduated  from  level  three.  

• 9  Basic  Counselling  Skills  graduates  were  hired  as  community  counsellors.    • Counsellors  were  trained  in  family  and  group  therapy.  • 45  group  therapy  sessions  were  offered  to  refugees.  • 4,511  refugees  received  an  average  of  eight   individual  counselling  sessions   from  a  

trained  counsellor.    • 220   refugee   families   received   an   average   of   eight   counselling   sessions   from   a  

trained  counsellor.  • A  large,  permanent  counselling  space  with  three  rooms  for  alternative  therapy  was  

constructed.    • 5885   newly   arrived   refugees   were   provided   with   psychological   screening   and  

psychological  first  aid  to  help  them  adapt  to  the  refugee  camp.  

Increased   the   psychosocial   well-­‐being   of   SGBV   survivors   by   placement   in   a   protection  facility  and  offering  counseling:  

• 134   women   and   children   were   admitted   to  Safe  Haven.  

• All   Safe   Haven   beneficiaries   received  psychosocial   support,   food   and   non-­‐food  items,  counseling,  life  skills  training,  and  case  management  services.  

• 36  women  participated  in  at  least  80  hours  a  month  of  tailoring  training  and  adult  literacy  classes.  

• 49%   of   children   admitted   to   Safe   Haven  continued  their  education  at  least  80  hours  a  month.  

• A   training   event  was   held   on   the   root   causes   of,   prevention   of,   and   responses   to  SGBV.    

• 74  beneficiaries  were  discharged  after  durable  solutions  were  found  for  their  cases.  • Sports   equipment,   games,   and   books   were   purchased   for   the   boys’   Safe   Haven  

facility.  • 193  unaccompanied  girls  in  the  Safe  Haven  were  provided  with  sanitary  kits.  • A   total   of   51   camp   community   leaders   attended   two   different   SGBV-­‐awareness  

trainings.    • 27  foster  parents  attended  child  protection  principles  classes,  focusing  on  caring  for  

child  survivors  and  preventing  child  abuse.  • 113   unaccompanied   children   were   provided   with   secure   accommodation   with   a  

foster  family.  

“Equipping   the   safe   haven  participants   with   these   skills  improves  their  healing  process  and  enables   them   to   feel   safe,   secure  and  at  ease  with  themselves.”    Jeremiah  Orongo  Otieno,  JRS  Safe  Haven  Assistant  Coordinator  in  Kakuma  

Page 15: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  15  of  19    

 

Improved   the   psychosocial   well-­‐being   of   intellectually   and   developmentally   disabled  persons  and  their  families  through  training  and  support:  

• A  five-­‐day  training  course  on  learning  disabilities  was  provided  to  54  refugees.  • 54  parents  were   trained   in   the  management  of  people   living  with   intellectual   and  

developmental  disabilities.  • Four  centers  provided  daytime  care  to  169  children  with  learning  disabilities.  They  

received   instruction   in  numeracy  and   literacy  skills,   fine  and  gross  motor  training,  help  with  daily  activities,  music   therapy,  group  therapy,  occupational   therapy,  and  physiotherapy.    

• 28  daycare   students  were  prepared   and  discharged   to   rejoin   school   or   vocational  training.    

• 7   disability   awareness   campaigns   were   conducted   for   students   throughout   the  Kakuma  refugee  camp,  and  World  Disability  Awareness  Day  was  celebrated.  

• 8   trainings   on   mental   health   were   delivered   to   refugees   and   host   community  members   to   build   their   capacity   in   providing   services   for   children   with   learning  disabilities.  

• Disability-­‐friendly  furniture  was  purchased  for  daycare  clients.  • 55  children  with  cerebral  palsy  received  specialized  nutritious  food.  

 

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  

With  the  increase  in  population,  there  has  been  a  corresponding  demand  on  the  available  resources  in  the  Kakuma  camp.  Further,  the  new  camp  that  was  expected  to  open  this  year  has   been   delayed.   However,   some   progress   has   been   made   in   the   recent   past,   as   an  agreement  was  signed  between  the  Kenyan  Government,  the  Turkana  County  Government,  UNHCR,   and   the   host   community   to   open   the   new   camp   the   next   few  months,   hopefully  reducing  the  demand  for  JRS  services  in  Kakuma.    

Mental  health  trainings  offered  to  parents  and  community  members  were  highly  valued  by  the   refugee   community,   and  most  participants  wished   that   the   trainings  would   continue.  Due   to   the   strain   on   transportation   –   JRS   has   a   limited   number   of   vehicles   available   in  Kakuma   –   the   trainings   all   occurred   in   a   central   location.   This  was   an   inconvenience   to  most   participants,   who   had   to   travel   long   distances   from   different   parts   of   the   camp.  Therefore,   the   program   plans   to   use   available   resources   to   alternate   training   locations,  rather  than  hosting  all  events  in  a  central  place.  

One  of   the  greatest  values  of   the  Safe  Haven   facility  has  been   its  ability   to  provide  a   safe  environment   to   women   and   children   survivors   of   SGBV   free   from   stigma,   threats,   and  prejudice.  However,   this   capacity   is   challenged  by   the   small   space  available,  which   limits  the  number  of  SGBV  survivors  that  can  be  assisted.  An  additional  challenge  is  that  finding  durable  solutions  to  SGBV  cases  is  a   long  process,  which  requires  survivors  to  stay  at  the  Safe  Haven   for   a   long   time.   This   overstaying   has   increased   anxiety   and   conflict   between  

Page 16: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  16  of  19    

Safe  Haven  beneficiaries,  who  have  a  limited  number  of  activities  and  resources  that  they  must  share.    

Staff  turnover  continues  to  be  one  of  the  greatest  challenges  to  the  program.  In  response,  JRS   is   seeking   to   increase   salaries   and   to   motivate   the   staff   through   team-­‐building  activities.  

Many  parents  have  approached  the  mental  health  centers  seeking  material  support,  which  is  not  readily  available.  This  is  because  the  agencies  charged  with  providing  non-­‐food  items  (NFIs)   cannot   meet   the   overwhelming   demand   due   to   increases   in   the   Kakuma   camp’s  population.  

In   the   course   of   outreach,   new   children   with   cerebral   palsy   in   need   of   supplementary  nutritional  support  were  identified,  doubling  the  total  number  of  children.  However,  these  new   children   were   not   accounted   for   in   the   original   budget,   straining   the   financial  resources  available.  

Although   the   Kakuma   Refugee   Camp   has   not   had   serious   security   issues   in   the   past,  residents  have  been  warned  several  times  that  it  may  be  a  soft  target  for  terrorist  attacks,  especially   those   seeking   to   target  humanitarian   aid  workers.  This  has  made  aid   agencies  anxious  about  serving  refugees  in  the  camp.  

 

   

 

   

Page 17: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  17  of  19    

Thailand  Bangkok  Urban  Refugee  Assistance  and  Protection  Program  (S-­‐PRMCO-­‐14-­‐CA-­‐1184)  

Country:    Thailand  

Locations:    Bangkok  

Program  Dates:    09/15/2014  –  09/14/2015  

PRM  Funding:    $254,808  JRS  Co-­‐Funding:    $79,287  

Direct  Beneficiaries:    3,110  People  Indirect  Beneficiaries:    5,000  People  

Refugees:    2,610  People  Non-­‐Refugees:    5,500  People  

 

Background  

Thailand  is  not  a  signatory  to  the  1951  Refugee  Convention  or  its  1967  Protocol.  Therefore,  the  Thai  government  regards  all  persons  without  valid  visas  –  including  those  seeking  asylum  and  those  recognized  by  UNHCR  as  refugees  –  as  illegal  immigrants.  Refugees  in  Thailand  are  subject  to  arrest,  detention,  denial  of  services,  and  deportation.  Consequently,  Thailand  is  home  to  growing  populations  seeking  international  protection,  but  who  are  unable  to  work,  and  have  no  access  to  health,  education,  or  other  public  services.  

According  to  recent  UNHCR  statistics,  the  number  of  registered  asylum  seekers  and  refugees  in  Thailand  has  quadrupled  since  2013.  The  majority  of  asylum  seekers  are  Christians  and  Ahmadi  Muslims  fleeing  religious  persecution  in  Pakistan,  Syrians  and  Palestinians  fleeing  war  in  Syria,  and  Vietnamese.  Small  numbers  of  asylum  seekers  from  countries  like  China,  Sri  Lanka,  Iran,  and  Cambodia  also  live  in  Bangkok.  In  recent  months,  the  inflow  of  Pakistani  asylum  seekers  has  increased,  placing  large  demands  on  UNHCR’s  capabilities.    

In  May  of  2014,  Thailand’s  military  briefly  imposed  martial  law  before  staging  a  coup  d’état  and  assuming  control  of  the  Thai  government.  Since  then,  the  country  has  experienced  low-­‐level  instability  and  public  demonstrations,  which  have  kept  asylum  seeker  communities  on  edge.  Beginning  in  March  2015,  the  Thai  government  has  become  more  aggressive  toward  asylum  seekers  in  Bangkok.  Mass  arrests  of  asylum  seekers  occurred  in  March  and  April  2015,  and  a  second  wave  of  immigration  and  security  checks  occurred  after  the  Bangkok  bombing  in  August  2015.  These  arrests  have  increased  the  vulnerability  of  asylum  seekers,  as  in  many  cases  heads  of  families  were  arrested  or  detained  and  are  now  unable  to  support  their  spouses  and  children.  

Single  women  –  especially  those  with  children  –  are  often  the  most  vulnerable  asylum  seekers  in  Bangkok.  These  women  often  do  not  have  financial  support  from  their  family,  and  cannot  find  day  care  for  their  children  if  they  have  jobs.  Further,  they  are  often  illiterate  and  do  not  feel  safe  traveling  around  Bangkok  to  find  social  services  for  asylum  seekers.  Because  most  asylum  seekers  are  illegally  present  in  Thailand,  women  cannot  

Page 18: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  18  of  19    

have  no  means  of  protection,  assistance,  and  redress  for  things  like  domestic  violence  or  sexual  assault.    

Children  are  also  a  significant  vulnerable  population  in  Bangkok.  Of  the  overall  asylum  seeker  population  of  8,000,  UNHCR  estimates  that  3,000  are  children,  the  majority  of  whom  are  under  15  years  of  age.  There  are  approximately  80  unaccompanied  or  separated  asylum  seeking  children.  

 

Program  Objectives  

Since  2014,  JRS  has  been  the  only  service  to  provide  a  comprehensive  and  holistic  range  of  services  to  the  urban  refugee  community  in  Bangkok,  including  emergency  protection,  legal  and  financial  assistance,  and  mental  health  programs.  

JRS  has  two  teams  providing  services  to  urban  refugees.  The  JRS  legal  team  gives  professional  legal  advice  and  representation  to  asylum  seekers  speaking  with  UNHCR  Thailand  at  every  stage  of  the  asylum  process,  including  appeals  and  reapplications.  JRS  also  has  a  team  of  social  caseworkers  and  psychosocial  counselors  who  provide  social  and  mental  health  services  through  needs  assessments,  interviews,  financial  assistance,  home  visits,  and  counseling  (individual,  family,  or  group).  Finally,  JRS  accompanies  asylum  seekers  to  access  basic  services  in  Thailand,  such  as  education,  medical  care,  and  housing.    

The  primary  targets  of  JRS  services  in  Bangkok  are  extremely  vulnerable  asylum  seekers,  including:  unaccompanied  and  separated  children,  single  parents,  pregnant  women,  LGBT  individuals,  survivors  of  SGBV,  the  elderly  without  family  support,  individuals  with  chronic  illnesses,  individuals  with  disabilities,  and  large  families.  

 

Accomplishments      

Image  courtesy  of  UNHCR.  JRS  program  sites  are  circled  in  yellow.  

“Group  sessions  help  them  feel  less  alone.  …   [Women   can   speak]  with  women   who   relate.   They   can   also  mirror   positive   behavior   for   their  own   development.  …   They  need   to  find   a   way   to   function   in   a   place  where   they   are   considered   illegal,  which   is  why  these   sessions  are   so  vital.”    Jennifer  Martin,  Psychosocial  Group  Counselor  in  Bangkok  

Page 19: ProjectsFundedbytheBureauof)Population,) …Population,) ... Department’s’ Bureau’ of’ Population,’ Refugees,’and’Migration’ ... Document’ for’ Peace’ in ...

Page  19  of  19    

Improved  access  to  primary  healthcare,  medical  services,  mental  health,  and  psychosocial  support  for  critically  vulnerable  urban  refugees  and  asylum  seekers:  

• 636   extremely   vulnerable   individuals   received   intensive   casework   and   financial  assistance.  

• 717  asylum  seekers  and  refugees  received  emergency  assistance,  including  shelter,  food,  medical  treatment,  and  referrals  to  other  organizations.  

• 667   asylum   seekers   and   refugees   received   psychosocial   support.   86%   reported  improved  mental  health.    

 

Lessons  Learned  &  Challenges  

The  mass  arrests  of  asylum  seekers  and  refugees  in  Bangkok,  combined  with  the  increased  intensity  of  police  and  immigration  sweeps,  has  affected  JRS  program  implementation.  The  heightened  police  and  military  presence  in  the  city  caused  a  steep  decline  in  the  number  of  clients  approaching  JRS,  many  fearful  of  unnecessary  travel.  JRS  had  to  cancel  or  postpone  many   large-­‐group   activities   in   order   to   minimize   the   security   risks   to   asylum   seekers.  Further,  staff  members  and  interpreters  who  are  asylum  seekers  were  unable  to  come  to  work  on  several  occasions  due  to  increased  security  presence  around  their  homes.    

The  large  population  of  asylum  seekers  has  placed  a  tremendous  demand  on  the  program.  Caseloads  are  quickly  increasing,  despite  an  expansion  in  human  resources.  The  stresses  on  staff  and  the  risk  of  burnout  are  carefully  being  managed.  

The   program   will   continue   to   provide   group   sessions   for   counselling   and   psychosocial  activity  as  it  has  proven  to  be  an  efficient  model  in  responding  to  high  needs  with  limited  resources.  Group   sessions,   as  opposed   to   individual   counselling  or   intake   sessions,   allow  the  counsellors  to  make  assessments  of  many  at  a  time  and  enable  group  members  to  form  support   linkages   amongst   themselves.   The   more   vulnerable   cases   can   be   identified   for  individual  follow-­‐up  if  personalized  counselling  is  deemed  necessary.