PROJECT SCOPING REPORT/ FINAL DESIGN REPORT

PROJECT SCOPING REPORT/ FINAL DESIGN REPORT

September 2013

1

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor JOAN MCDONALD, Commissioner

Bridge Replacement Project, P.I.N. 0229.40, BIN: 1049350

Carlls Straight Path over I-495 (Long Island Expressway) Town of Huntington

Suffolk County

September 2013 Project Scoping Report/Final Design Report PIN 0229.40

The following table of approximate conversion factors provides the relationship between metric and U.S. Customary units for some of the more frequently used units in highway design. The table allows one to calculate the U.S. Customary Unit by multiplying the corresponding Metric Unit by the given factor.

Metric Unit x Factor = U.S. Customary Unit

Length

kilometer (km) x 0.621 = miles (mi)

meter (m) x 3.281 = feet (ft.)

Area hectare (ha) x 2.471 = acres (a)

square meter (m2) x 1.196 = square yards (sy)

square meter (m2) x 10.764 = square feet (sf)

Volume cubic meter (m3) x 1.308 = cubic yards (cy)

cubic meter (m3) x 35.315 = cubic feet (cf)

Speed kilometer per hour (km/h) x 0.621 = miles per hour (mph)

meter per second (m/s) x 3.281 = feet per second (ft/s)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVER (Title / PIN / Location) METRIC TO U.S. CUSTOMARY UNIT CONVERSION TABLE (also on back cover) ............................ i PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET .............................................................................................................. ii LIST OF PREPARERS .......................................................................................................................... iii CHAPTER 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Where is the Project Located? ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.2 Why is the Project Needed? ............................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.3 What are the Objectives/Purposes of the Project?.......................................................... 1-2 1.3 What Alternative(s) is Being Considered? .................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Environmental Review .................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5 How will the Alternatives Affect the Environment? ....................................................................... 1-4 1.6 What are the Costs and Schedules? ............................................................................................ 1-5 1.7 Which Alternative is Preferred? .................................................................................................... 1-6 1.8 Who will decide which Alternative is Chosen and How Can I be Involved in this Decision? ....... 1-6 CHAPTER 2 – PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 Local Plans for the Project Area ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Abutting Highway Segments and Future Plans for Abutting Highway Segments ........................ 2-1 2.3 Transportation Conditions, Deficiencies and Engineering Considerations .................................. 2-1 2.3.1 Traffic and Safety and Maintenance Operations ................................................................ 2-1 2.3.1.1 Functional Classification and National Highway System (NHS) ............................ 2-1 2.3.1.2 Control of Access ................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1.3 Traffic Control Devices .......................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1.4 Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1.5 Speeds ................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.1.6 Level of Service ..................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.1.7 Work Zone Safety and Mobility .............................................................................. 2-3 2.3.1.8 Safety Considerations, Accident History and Analysis .......................................... 2-3 2.3.1.9 Ownership and Maintenance Jurisdiction .............................................................. 2-4 2.3.2 Multimodal ........................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.2.1 Pedestrians ............................................................................................................ 2-4 2.3.2.2 Bicyclists ................................................................................................................ 2-5 2.3.3 Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.3.1 Design Standards .................................................................................................. 2-5 2.3.3.2 Critical Design Elements ........................................................................................ 2-5 2.3.3.3 Other Design Parameters ...................................................................................... 2-6 2.3.3.4 Existing and Proposed Highway/Bridge Plan and Section .................................... 2-6 2.3.3.5 Non Standard/Non Conforming Features .............................................................. 2-6 2.3.3.6 Pavement and Shoulder Conditions ...................................................................... 2-6 2.3.3.7 Drainage Systems ................................................................................................. 2-7 2.3.3.8 Geotechnical .......................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3.3.9 Structures ............................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3.3.10 Hydraulics of Bridges and Culverts ..................................................................... 2-10 2.3.3.11 Utilities ................................................................................................................. 2-10 2.3.3.12 Guide Railing, Median Barriers and Impact Attenuators ..................................... 2-11 2.3.3.13 Right of Way ........................................................................................................ 2-11 2.3.3.14 Landscaping/Environmental Enhancement ......................................................... 2-11 2.4 Miscellaneous ............................................................................................................................. 2-11

iv


v

CHAPTER 3 – SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) ...................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Additional Environmental Information ........................................................................................... 3-2

APPENDICES

A. Maps, Plans, Profiles & Typical Sections B. Environmental Information C. Traffic Information and Pedestrian Generator Checklist D. Public Information Plan


CHAPTER 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. Introduction The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) has prepared this Project Scoping Report/ Final Design Report (PSR/FDR) to address structural deficiencies present in the Bridge (BIN 1049350) carrying Carlls Straight Path over I-495 (Long Island Expressway) in the Town of Huntington, Suffolk County, New York. This PSR/FDR identifies the existing structural deficiencies; presents and evaluates alternative solutions to improve or eliminate the existing deficiencies; and identifies the preferred alternative to be advanced into Final Design and Construction. This report was prepared in accordance with the NYSDOT Project Development Manual, 17 NYCRR (New York Codes, Rules and Regulations) Part 15, and 23 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 771. Transportation needs have been identified (section 1.2), objectives established (1.2.3) to address the needs, and cost-effective alternatives developed (1.3). This project is federally funded. 1.2. Purpose and Need

1.2.1. Where is the Project Located?

1


1.2.2. Why is the Project Needed? This project proposes to address structural deficiencies associated with normal deterioration, fatigue-prone special emphasis details, and impact damage. The structural deficiencies include the poor condition of the deck, deck joints, sidewalks, damaged and deteriorated girders, deteriorated and outdated bearings, and deteriorated pier caps with substructures inadequate to resist seismic forces. The stringers in the long center spans over the Long Island Expressway (LIE) have cover plates attached with transverse welds. Additionally, operational deficiencies exist with the structure involving inadequate bicycle accommodations on Carlls Straight Path, and a need for an increase in the span to accommodate increased horizontal clearance on the LIE for anticipated extension of the access ramps for the truck rest stops just east of the structure.

1.2.3. What are the Objectives/Purposes of the Project?

(1) Restore the bridge condition rating to 5, or greater, for at least 75 years using cost effective techniques to minimize the life cycle cost of maintenance and repair.

(2) Address the structural deficiencies of the girders, bearings, and deck. (3) Increase the minimum vertical clearance over the LIE to 14’-6” to prevent damage to primary and

secondary members from impacts, while optimizing beam depth. (4) Provide for standard horizontal and vertical clearances on the LIE for the anticipated future

extension of the deceleration and acceleration lanes for the truck rest stops east of the bridge. (5) Provide standard bicyclist and pedestrian accommodations along Carlls Straight Path.

1.3. What Alternative is Being Considered? Project alternatives were developed to meet the overall project objectives. A No Build or "No Action" Alternative is presented to establish a baseline of comparison for no remedial action. Alternative 1 - No Build The No Build Alternative will make no physical improvements to the bridge but will continue NYSDOT's current maintenance and repair efforts, addressing the most serious areas of deterioration while maintaining the bridge in a state of good repair. Critical structural deficiencies would remain unaddressed. This alternative will result in the continued deterioration of the bridge elements, especially the deck which will increase the likelihood of localized deck spalls and deterioration of the stay-in-place forms creating a hazard to traffic on the Long Island Expressway. The girders over the Long Island Expressway will continue to suffer impact damage due to the low vertical clearance. The existing substructures are in the same spatial location as the anticipated future extension of the LIE deceleration and acceleration lanes for the truck rest stops east of the bridge, and their retention would make the LIE deceleration and acceleration lane extensions impractical to construct. This alternative will not rectify the structural or operational deficiencies as outlined in the project objectives. The No Build Alternative was eliminated from further consideration because it will not meet the project objectives. Alternative 2 - Superstructure Replacement When this alternative was initially developed, it was prior to the realization that the project needed to accommodate the anticipated future extension of the LIE deceleration and acceleration lanes for the truck rest stops just east of the bridge. However, because the existing substructures would remain in the same

2


spatial locations where the deceleration and acceleration lane extensions would be constructed, their retention would make the lane extensions impractical to construct, and as a result this alternative was eliminated from further consideration. Although discarded, it is still presented here to document its initial consideration. This alternative considered replacing the existing four-span superstructure. The existing superstructure would be demolished and removed. The new superstructure would be designed to accommodate the AASHTO HL-93 Live Load. Continuity of stringers at the center pier would be considered. This continuity would reduce the current seismic deficiency related to insufficient seat length and would reduce the possibility of span collapse in the longitudinal direction. The stringers at the abutments and the pier would be supported on the seat at the same level which would reduce the vulnerability to the loss of support related to the inadequate restraint in the transverse direction. The scope of work also included minor substructure repairs, new bearings, new bridge approach slabs, new median barriers and bridge railings and approach pavement reconstruction. This alternative would be expected to provide an additional 75 years of service life for the bridge structure provided that the substructures are rehabilitated periodically. The vertical clearance would be improved with this alternative, but may not provide the full clearance required to avoid all future collision damage. The proposed roadway section at the bridge would be the same as the existing roadway section. Since a new superstructure would be provided, the need for costly maintenance repairs associated with regular painting cycles would be significantly reduced. As stated earlier, since the existing substructures would be in the same spatial location as the anticipated future extension of the LIE deceleration and acceleration lanes, their retention would make the LIE deceleration and acceleration lane extensions impractical to construct. Also, since the existing bridge substructures do not meet current seismic standards, both significant retrofit and reconstruction to support a new wider bridge superstructure is also not practical, as better materials and attaining current design standards, and innovation of construction are all better-served by replacement of the existing bridge pier and abutment substructures for the current design load conditions. The cost for this alternative is $6.86M. This cost is 94% of the replacement cost. When the rehabilitation cost exceeds 85% of the replacement cost, bridge replacement is preferred. Although this alternative would address most of the structural deficiencies, it does not address all of the operational deficiencies or future needs, as described above and in the project objectives. The Superstructure Replacement Alternative was eliminated from further consideration. Alternative 3 – Bridge Replacement With this alternative, the bridge will be replaced with a two-span continuous superstructure to address the structural deficiencies associated with the deteriorated deck, girders, and bearings, along with other structural elements. The new deck will insure that the bridge remains serviceable for at least 75 years. A new deck will eliminate the need for a wearing surface replacement and costly maintenance repairs associated with eventual underside deck spalls as the stay-in-place forms fail due to corrosion. Further, elimination of the existing transverse deck joints will result in maintenance cost savings. This alternative will insure the bridge meets all modern requirements for seismic resistance. In addition, the new bridge will have increased roadway width to meet pedestrian and bicycle needs. Vertical clearances will be increased above the minimum to the desirable for interstates. By replacing the existing substructures and increasing the span length over the LIE, allowances can be made for the anticipated increase in length of acceleration and deceleration lanes for the truck rest stops just east of the bridge. The new bridge can be constructed on a slightly improved alignment which will conform to the

3


approach alignment. The approach roadways will be reconstructed, as necessary, to meet the raised bridge profile. This alternative is the preferred solution. For a more in-depth discussion of the design criteria see Section 2.3.3.2 of this report. 1.4 Environmental Review NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act): After completion of the investigations identified here and the NEPA Assessment Checklist (included in Appendix B), it has been determined that the project is a Class II Programmatic Categorical Exclusion. This is because it will not cause a significant environmental impact, either individually or cumulatively with other area projects or actions. As a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion, the project is exempt under NEPA from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or an Environmental Assessment (EA). FHWA has concurred programmatically with the environmental determination. SEQRA (State Environmental Quality Review Act): In accordance with 17 NYCRR Part 15, “Procedures for Implementation of State Environmental Quality Review Act,” the Department has determined that this project is a SEQR Type II Action and that no further SEQR processing is required. The project has been identified as a Type II Action per 17 NYCRR Part 15, Section 15.14, Subdivision (e), Item (37), Paragraph (iv): ‘replacement reconstruction or rehabilitation, at present sites of existing bridges, culverts or other transportation structures, including railroad crossing structures, not involving substantial expansion of the structure.’ This permits the project to be classified as Type II since the project does not violate any of the criteria contained in subdivision (d) of Section 15.14. 1.5 How will the Alternatives Affect the Environment? Exhibit 1.1 Comparison of Alternatives Alternatives Category Bridge

Replacement Null

Wetland impacts None None None 100 year floodplain impact None None

Archeological Sites Impacted None None Section 106/Section 4(f) impacts None None

Visual Impacts None None Impact to forested areas None None Noise Impacts None None

Suspect ACM identified Asbestos Impacts None

Property impacts None None

Load Rating HS 20 HL 93 Construction Cost None $13.02 M

4


Anticipated Permits/Certifications/Coordination:

Coordination • Coordination with Federal Highway Administration

Certifications

• NYS Department of Labor: Asbestos Variances; if determined to be necessary

Others • Construction Staging Permit • Town of Huntington Inspection Permit

1.6 What are the Costs & Schedules?

Exhibit 1.3 – Comparison of Alternatives’ Project Costs (in millions)

Bridge Replacement

Activities

Construction Costs

Bridge $7.26 Highway $0.72 SPDES Permit Compliance $0.00

Incidentals (10%) $0.80

Subtotal 1 $8.77 Contingency (15% at Design

Approval) $1.32

Subtotal 2 $10.08

Field Change Order $0.00

Subtotal 3 $10.08

Mobilization (4%) $0.40 Subtotal 4 $10.49 Design (8%) $0.84

Expected Award Amount (Inflate current costs/prices at

3%/yr. to midpoint of construction to arrive at $

amount to be entered here) See HDM 21.6.3.2 B

$0.64 Construction Inspection (10%) $1.05 ROW Costs $0

Total Alternative Costs $13.02

5


Design Approval is scheduled for October 2013 with Construction scheduled to last 19 months beginning in April of 2014.

Exhibit 1.2 - Project Schedule

Activity Date Occurred/Tentative

Final RFQ Issuance 8/28/2013 Design Approval 10/16/2013

Final RFP Issuance 11/15/2013 Proposals Due 1/15/2014 Design-Build Notice to Proceed 4/15/2014

Construction Complete 11/10/2015 1.7 Which Alternative is Preferred? Only one feasible build alternative, Alternative 3 – Bridge Replacement, has been identified that meets the project objectives. A decision to enter final design will not be made until after the environmental determination and evaluation of the comments on the draft design approval document. 1.8 Who Will Decide Which Alternative is Chosen And How Can I Be Involved In This Decision? A Public Involvement Plan (PIP) has been prepared in accordance with the NYSDOT PDM. There may be a Public Information Meeting during the project design, if determined by NYSDOT to be of benefit to the public. A Public Hearing will not be required. Refer to Appendix D for the PIP. Notification letters will be sent to public officials and project stakeholders announcing the project. Meetings with Internal and External Stakeholders will be held, as needed.

Exhibit 1.4 Public Involvement Plan Schedule of Milestone Dates

Activity Date Occurred/Tentative

Notification letters sent to public officials TBD

Notification letters sent to project stakeholders TBD

Design-Build Notice to Proceed 4/15/2014

Public Information Meeting Summer 2014

6


7

• You can contact:

Gene Gaye, Project Manager

Please include the six digit Project Identification Number (PIN) 0229.40 Questions or comments email: [email protected]

Telephone: (631) 952-6645

Mailing Address New York State Department of Transportation

Region 10 Design New York State Office Building

250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788

• You can visit the Project’s website: https://www.dot.ny.gov/main/business-center/carls-i495

The remainder of this report is a detailed technical evaluation of the existing conditions, the proposed alternatives, the impacts of the alternatives, copies of technical reports and plans and other supporting information.

mailto:[email protected]

https://www.dot.ny.gov/main/business-center/carls-i495


CHAPTER 2 – PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 Local Plans for the Project Area This project is on the approved Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as project No. 0229.40. The TIP must be amended to reflect a change in the project type from bridge rehabilitation to bridge replacement. The Regional Planning Group has reviewed the local master plan prepared for the Town of Huntington. This project is consistent with the local master plan. There are no approved developments planned within the project area that will impact traffic operations. 2.2. Abutting Highway Segments and Future Plans for Abutting Highway Segments Carlls Straight Path between the south Service Road and Thornwood Drive and consists of one travel lane in each direction and a right turn lane. It is curbed on both sides with varying lane and shoulder widths. At Thornwood Drive, the roadway section consists of two 10 ft travel lanes and 6 ft curbed shoulders. Carlls Straight Path between Sweet Water Court and the north Service Road consists of one travel lane in each direction and a right turn lane. The roadway is curbed southbound with no shoulder and northbound has a varying width uncurbed shoulder. At Sweet Water Court, the roadway section consists of two 10 ft travel lanes and 6 ft curbed shoulders. The alignment is generally straight and level. The Regional Planning Group has confirmed that there are no plans to reconstruct or widen this segment of Carlls Straight Path, or the adjoining segments, within the next 20 years. On the segment of the LIE where the Carlls Straight Path bridge crosses over it, a future project is anticipated that will extend the acceleration and deceleration lanes for the eastbound and westbound truck rest stops east of the bridge. These lanes currently begin/end just east of the bridge and have non-conforming lengths. It is anticipated they would be extended underneath the bridge to some point west of the bridge. 2.3 Transportation Conditions, Deficiencies and Engineering Considerations

2.3.1 Traffic and Safety and Maintenance Operations 2.3.1.1 Functional Classification and National Highway System (NHS) –

Exhibit 2.1 Classification Data

North and South Service Roads Route(s) Carlls Straight Path I-495

Functional Classification Urban Minor Arterial Urban - Principal

Arterial Interstate Urban - Principal

Arterial, Other National Highway System (NHS) No Yes No

Designated Truck Access Route No No No

1


Qualifying Highway No Yes No

Within 1.6 km of a Qualifying Highway Yes No Yes

Within the 4.9 m vertical clearance network No No No

2.3.1.2 Control of Access – Access to I-495 is fully controlled. The service roads are partial controlled with some at-grade intersections and driveway connections. Access to Carlls Straight Path is not controlled. No changes will result from the project. 2.3.1.3 Traffic Control Devices – There are signs within the project limits, as well as traffic signals and pedestrian crossing signals and push button controls at the North and South Service Road intersections. The traffic signals and pedestrian crossing signals and push button controls are owned, maintained and control-operated by NYSDOT’s INFORM office. The condition of traffic control devices within the project limits will be determined by the design-builder. The project will provide the latest current standard of traffic signal pole and cable supports, and also the latest standard for the push button control systems with count down timers at the pedestrian safety walks. Pavement markings on Carlls Straight Path will be replaced. There are no ITS systems in operation or planned for the project area. 2.3.1.4 Traffic Volumes –

Exhibit 2.2 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes

I-495 Service Roads Carlls Straight Path

South Service Road

North Service Road Northbound Southbound

Year ADT DHV ADT DHV ADT DHV ADT DHV Existing (2013) 5012 702 5163 1084 3762 421 2885 296

ETC (2015) 5109 716 5264 1105 3834 429 2940 302

ETC+10 (2025) 5596 784 5765 1210 4192 469 3215 330

ETC+30 (2045) 6569 921 6768 1420 4909 549 3765 386

Note: ETC is the Estimated Time of Completion Future no-build design year traffic volume forecasts – The Estimated Time of Completion (ETC) + 30 design year was selected per PDM Appendix 5. The build design year traffic volume forecasts are the same as the no-build. Daily truck traffic on Carlls Straight Path is 4%. Carlls Straight Path traffic counts and turning movement counts at the North and South Service Road intersections are included in Appendix C. Due to operational and incident management considerations, the Regional Traffic Engineer has recommended that a continuous two-way left-turn lane be installed between the North and South Service Road intersections. The local Fire Department located south of the South Service Road would be better served by a continuous two-way left-turn lane, in order to administer their emergency services.

2


2.3.1.5 Speeds –

Exhibit - 2.3 Speed Data

Route Carlls Straight Path Existing Speed Limit 30 mph

Operating Speed and Method Used for Measurement Spot Speed Study - 85th percentile speeds 41 mph SB and 37 mph NB

2.3.1.6 Level of Service The Regional Planning and Program Manager does not anticipate capacity improvements within 20 years. 2.3.1.7 Work Zone Safety & Mobility A. Work Zone Traffic Control Plan Two-way traffic will be maintained at all times via lane shifts onto the existing paved shoulder. No off-site detours will be required. Routes for emergency vehicles will be maintained and open during construction. The movement of pedestrians will be maintained during construction. The details for the work zone traffic control will be prepared and evaluated during final design. B. Special Provisions Due to the close proximity to residential homes and the ability to maintain traffic with acceptable delays during the daylight hours, night time construction will not be utilized. The use of time related provisions will be evaluated during final design. The work zone traffic control will need to be coordinated with local officials and residents. With a chance of vibration during construction that could cause cracking to home foundations, water district type water well heads, residential pools, cracks in home walls, etc., a Building Condition Survey, Report and Monitoring Plan will be required for residences and buildings in proximity to the project area. C. Significant Projects (per 23 CFR 630.1010) The Region has determined that the project is significant per 23 CFR 630.1010. A Transportation Management Plan (TMP) will be prepared for the project consistent with 23 CFR 630.1012. The TMP will consist of: • A Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) plan • A Transportation Operations (TO) component • A Public Information component (PI) 2.3.1.8 Safety Considerations, Accident History and Analysis Accident data from January 1, 2010 thru December 31, 2012 was analyzed in accordance with NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 5. The accident rates for the intersection with the North Service Road and South Service Road is 0.078 accidents per million vehicle miles and 0.273 accidents per million vehicle miles respectively. Compared to the statewide accident rate for similar facilities, which is 0.24 accidents per million vehicle miles, the North Service Road intersection is below average and the South Service Road intersection is slightly above average. There are no high accident locations (HALs) within the study area.

3


The predominate accident types are:

Exhibit 2.4 Collision Summary

Type of Collision Number Percentage Overtake 1 4 Fixed Object 10 43 RT Angle 6 26 Rear End 4 17 Right Turn Against 1 4 Other 1 4

An accident analysis including an accident summary and collision diagrams is in Appendix C. The crash experience is well below any threshold for consideration of enhancing existing or installing new traffic controls. Since the proposed project is not necessary to correct an existing or potential safety problem, the Regional Traffic and Safety Office has determined that consideration of accident countermeasures is not necessary. 2.3.1.9 Ownership and Maintenance Jurisdiction – NYSDOT owns the Carlls Straight Path bridge and is responsible for its maintenance, except for the bridge deck wearing surface. NYSDOT owns Carlls Straight Path between the North and South Service Roads and the Town of Huntington is responsible for its maintenance. NYSDOT owns and is responsible for maintenance within the right-of-way of the LIE. NYSDOT owns and provides snow and ice removal on the service roads adjacent to the LIE, while Suffolk County is responsible for all other maintenance. NYSDOT owns and maintains the two traffic signal and pedestrian cross walk push button control systems at the two service road intersections. The utilities carried on the bridge are owned and maintained by the respective utility providers. Under Highway Law (Section 340-d), the bridge deck wearing surface was required to be maintained by the Town of Huntington; however the Town has declined to provide that required maintenance. NYSDOT has since advised the Town that funds will be reduced from the CHIPS apportionments related to the cost of maintaining the wearing surface on bridges carrying Town of Huntington roads over the LIE. The project will result in no changes to the ownership and maintenance responsibilities, except that now NYSDOT will be responsible for maintaining the bridge deck wearing surface. 2.3.2 Multimodal 2.3.2.1 Pedestrians – Pedestrians are accommodated on the east side of Carlls Straight Path between the two service roads on concrete sidewalk from the north LIE Service Road intersection to 24 feet south of the bridge abutment, then from there to the south LIE Service Road intersection via paved shoulder. Pedestrians cross the two service roads at painted crosswalks with push button controls along the easterly side of Carlls Straight Path. There is concrete sidewalk on the west side of the bridge, but it does not extend to the north and south service road intersections. The project will provide for continuous pedestrian accommodation via concrete sidewalk along the east side of Carlls Straight Path between the north and south LIE Service Road intersections. Sidewalks will not be provided on the west side of Carlls Straight path. The crosswalks on the east side of intersections should be restriped, and given the proximity of the residential neighborhood to the Candlewood Middle

4


School south of the bridge, pedestrian countdown timers should also be considered at the intersections to provide for pedestrian safety, and to support the Safe Routes to School Program objectives. A Pedestrian Generator Checklist is included in Appendix C. 2.3.2.2 Bicyclists – There is no bike path or bike lane currently on Carlls Straight Path; however, it is identified as a connecting route to the bicycle route on Vanderbilt Parkway. Currently, bicyclists share the roadway or use the varying width shoulder. The project will provide accommodation for bicyclists on the new 5 ft shoulders on both sides of Carlls Straight Path. 2.3.3 Infrastructure 2.3.3.1 Design Standards –

• NYSDOT Highway Design Manual Chapter 2 • NYSDOT Bridge Manual

2.3.3.2 Critical Design Elements

Exhibit 2.5 Critical Design Elements for Carlls Straight Path

PIN: 0229.40 NHS (Y/N): No Route No. & Name: Carlls Straight Path Functional Classification: Urban - Minor Arterial

Project Type: Bridge Replacement Design Classification: Urban Arterial % Trucks: 4 Terrain: Level

ADT (2045): 8674 Truck Access/Qualifying Hwy. Neither

Element Standard Existing Condition

Proposed Condition

1 Design Speed 45 mph1 30 mph posted 45 mph

2 Lane Width 11 ft Travel Lane

11 ft TWLTL HDM Section 2.7.2.2 B and BM 2.3.1 Table 2-1

2@ 10 ft 11 ft left turn

lanes @ intersections

2 @ 11 ft 1 @ 11 ft TWLTL

3 Shoulder Width 5 ft2 HDM Section 2.7.2.2 C and BM 2.3.1 Table 2-1 4 ft** 5 ft

4 Bridge Roadway Width Full approach roadway width HDM Section 2.7.2.2 D and BM 2.3.1 Table 2-1 28 ft 43 ft

5 Maximum Grade 6 % HDM Section 2.7.2.2 E, Table 2-4 4% 5.25%

(< 5% desired)

6 Horizontal Curvature 711 ft (@ e = 4%) HDM Section 2.7.2.2 F, Table 2-4 Tangent Tangent

7 Superelevation Rate 4% Maximum HDM Section 2.7.2.2 G N.C. N.C.

8 Stopping Sight Distance 360 ft HDM Section 2.7.2.2 H, Table 2-4 365 ft 360.5 ft

9 Horizontal Clearance 1.5 ft without barrier; 0 ft with barrier provided; and 3 ft at

intersections (from face of curb) HDM Section 2.7.2.2 l

4.5 ft 5.0 ft

10 Vertical Clearance 14 ft above traveled way

14 ft (14’-6” desired) to lower roadway HDM Section 2.7.2.2 H and BM 2.4.1 Table 2-2

14.096 ft 14 ft – 6 in

11 Travel Lane Cross Slope 1.5% Min. to 2% Max. HDM Section 2.7.2.2 K 2% 2%

12 Rollover 4% between travel lanes; 8% at edge of traveled way; HDM Section 2.7.2.2 L 4% 4%

5


NYSDOT LRFD Specifications

AASHTO HL-93 Live Load and

NYSDOT Design Permit Vehicle

13 Structural Capacity

New and Replacement Bridges NYSDOT LRFD Specifications AASHTO HL-93 Live

Load and NYSDOT Design Permit Vehicle HDM Section 2.7.2.2 M and BM 2.6

HS20

14 Pedestrian Accommodation

Complies with HDM Chapter 18 HDM Section 2.7.2.2 M

4 ft ** Complies with HDM Chapter 18

(1) The Regional Traffic Engineer has concurred that the use of a Design Speed of 45 mph is consistent with the anticipated off-peak 85th percentile speed within the range of functional class speeds for the terrain and volume. (2) Shoulder to accommodate bicyclists

**Denotes non-standard feature.

2.3.3.3 Other Design Parameters

There are no other design parameters considered for this project. 2.3.3.4 Existing and Proposed Highway/Bridge Plan and Section – Carlls Straight Path at the bridge is a two lane arterial with 10+/- ft wide travel lanes, 4+ ft wide striped shoulders and 4 ft wide sidewalks on both sides of the bridge. There are 8-inch high non-mountable curbs on both sides of the bridge. On the bridge approaches, the roadway widens and transitions to provide 11+ ft wide left turn lanes at the signalized intersections with the North and South Service Roads. The north approach roadway has 6-inch high non-mountable curbs on both sides, a 1+ ft paved shoulder on east side, a variable width shoulder on the west side tapering from 4+ ft at the bridge to 14+ ft at the intersection, a concrete sidewalk on the east side with W-beam corrugated guide railing and an asphalt sidewalk on the west side with box beam guide railing. The south approach has no sidewalks, a variable width shoulder on the east side tapering from 4+ ft at the bridge to 10+ ft at the intersection, a 6-inch high non-mountable curb only on the west side, and box beam guide railing on both sides. The proposed section of Carlls Straight Path between the North and South Service Road intersections will consist of two 11 ft wide travel lanes, one 11 ft wide two-way left-turn lane, 5 ft wide shoulders and a 5 ft wide sidewalk with snow storage along the east side. Existing and proposed plans (with proposed lane configuration) and sections are found in Appendix A. 2.3.3.5 Non Standard/Non Conforming Features - The existing non-standard 4 ft sidewalk width on the bridge (both sides) will be replaced with a standard 5 ft sidewalk on the east side. The project proposes no non-standard or non-conforming features. The 2011 Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines specifies that where existing physical constraints make it impracticable for altered facilities to fully comply with the requirements for new construction, compliance is required to the extent practicable within the scope of the project. Due to the physical constraints in which the bridge can be constructed, it may be impracticable to meet the HDM Chapter 18 5% maximum grade required for sidewalks. An objective of this project is to raise the bridge such that a minimum 14’-6” vertical clearance over the LIE is obtained. To do so, may require raising the profile of the Carlls Straight Path with grades slightly above 5%. The contractor will be instructed to achieve the 5% maximum grades to the extent practicable. 2.3.3.6 Pavement and Shoulder Conditions - The pavement condition rating is 5. The project will provide for reconstruction of the north and south approach roadways by removing the complete pavement to expose the ground surface followed by the installation of a new pavement system.

6


2.3.3.7 Drainage Systems - There are the four drainage catch basins with grates along the curb line in the each of the four bridge approach quadrants, just beyond the two bridge abutments. The east side and west side catch basins are connected together by a 15 inch diameter CMP culvert, then outlets to the LIE via 15 inch diameter CMP culvert from the west side catch basins to an underground drainage system that is parallel and well outside the bridge, and is under the LIE roadway where it eventually connects with the LIE retention basins located between the eastbound LIE roadway shoulder and the eastbound LIE service road. There is no anticipated impact to buried drainage systems for the LIE except where the local connection of the bridge approach catch basins lateral pipe within the abutment embankment side slope occurs and maybe locally impacted by relocation of these basins toward the replacement bridge carried roadway curb line position. Drainage will be designed as needed for the required storm runoff, making use of existing drainage systems in the approaches with any retrofit or repairs, and/or new drainage systems will be installed in the bridge approaches if current design standards and condition of the existing system makes that necessary. No bridge scupper systems will be placed on the bridge deck. 2.3.3.8 Geotechnical – There are no special geotechnical concerns with the soils or rock slopes within the project area. 2.3.3.9 Structures – Description: The bridge carrying Carlls Straight Path over I-495 (Long Island Expressway) is a four-span structure with an overall length of 229’-7 ½”and an out-to-out width of 39’-10”. The superstructure is comprised of 6 Rolled Steel WF Beams for the stringers with a reinforced concrete deck and a bituminous overlay in the travel lanes. The substructures are comprised of reinforced concrete cantilevered type abutments with U-wingwalls on spread footings and three multi-column piers each on a spread footing. There is a longitudinal expansion joint over each pier. The lengths and features crossed for each span are as follows:

• Span 1 and Span 4 are 35’ 11 1/16” long approach spans. • Span 2 is a 78’ 10 ⅝” long span crossing Eastbound I-495. • Span 3 is a 78’ 10 ⅝” long span crossing Westbound I-495.

This structure carries 8 ½” of 37 ½”-high four rail galvanized steel bridge rail, 4’ sidewalk with steel faced brush curb, and is striped for 4’-0” shoulder and a 10’-0” wide travel on each side of the centerline. In addition, there are four lighted Overhead Sign Structures (OSS), two for Eastbound LIE traffic and two for Westbound, supported by the fascia girders. The electric service for the OSS is provided via wooden poles at each end of the bridge. This project proposes to address structural deficiencies associated with normal deterioration and the low minimum vertical clearance of the bridge carrying Carlls Straight Path over I-495 (Long Island Expressway). This has led to increasingly costly repairs and inspections. It will also address operational deficiencies associated with left turn lanes and bicycle accommodations on the bridge and acceleration and deceleration lanes associated with a truck rest stop just east of the bridge. History – This bridge was built in 1963 under Contract No. FALIE 60-3. The bridge inventory does not have records of any major bridge rehabilitation work on this bridge. Past work on this structure includes:

• 1978 - D 95335 - Clean and paint • 1991 - D252949 - Repair and replace steel members • 1995 - D254006 - Bridge pier protection

7


• 1997 - D256285 - Sandblast, clean and paint • 2000 - Straighten and repair Girder G-1 • 2008 - D260394 - Clean and paint

The structures’ primary members are rolled WF shape steel beams that were fabricated from ASTM A7 steel. The bridge has undergone general maintenance and some steel repairs for impact damage. The cover plate end welds at the bottom flange of stringers S2 thru S5 of spans 2 & 3 are fatigue prone details. Inspection & Deficiencies - According to the 2011 Biennial Inspection, the NYSDOT General Recommendation is 4 and the Computed Condition Rating is 4.266. An in-depth inspection of the structure was performed by HNTB Engineers in March 2012. The inspection was performed in accordance with the latest edition of NYSDOT Bridge Inspection Manual. A visual inspection was performed on both the top of the bridge deck and the underside. The underside of the deck Spans 1 to 4 shows 80% of the area exhibits signs of moderate to heavy deterioration of the galvanized metal pan stay-in-place forms. It appears that water is penetrating through the concrete deck causing deterioration of the stay-in-place forms. At Spans 1 thru 4, the asphalt wearing surface exhibits scattered small potholes, cracks, rutting and uneven and cracked asphalt patches. The asphalt patches are mostly near the abutments, pier joints and at center line of the bridge. The ride quality is poor. In the most recent biennial inspection, the structural deck for all spans was rated “3”. The stem walls of the abutments are in good condition with a few minor cracks. The back wall, bridge seat, and pedestals are all in good condition. Approach and bridge railing are rated 4 with some damage. The original plans indicate that aluminum bridge rail was specified for this bridge. The steel stringers are all in good condition with surface corrosion and pin point rusting in local areas with the exception of those areas on the stringers and diaphragms which show damage from impacts. In Span 2, stringer S1 at the first interior diaphragm has a 12" long full crack at the bottom portion of web. Stringer S1 is deformed due to heavy impact at the bottom flange between diaphragms D1 (first interior diaphragm) and D2 (second interior diaphragm) and is bent out of plane approximately 6" horizontally. In addition, due to the impact the first interior diaphragm is deformed and buckled. In Span 3, on the right side of right fascia girder there were two points of impact, causing gouges in the bottom web and cover plate. No cracks were detected at this point of impact. The bottom of the girder is displaced to the left between intermediate diaphragms to a maximum of approximately 1 ½" at point of impact. On the left side of the girder there is a vertical crack in bottom of the weld on both sides of the diaphragm connection plate. On the right side of right fascia girder, there were two points of impact, causing gouges in the cover plate. The existing steel sliding bearings are rated 4 but are showing deterioration due to corrosion. This type of bearing is no longer recommended for use on NYSDOT bridges. There are signs of water leakage on the pier cap due to the deteriorated joints over the piers. The pier columns/stems and the caps are in mostly in good condition except for few minor cracks and a localized spall area with exposed rebar on one pedestal. In Span 3, a section of the panel of the OSS that is attached to the right fascia stringer is bent at the bottom due to impact damage. The bottom of the middle vertical strut member is also bent. The sign structure is secure and the remaining sign structure support members are in good condition. Bridge inspection reports are on file and available.

8


Bridge Inspection Ratingsenter BIN 1049350 Las t Inspection Date 3/19/2012 Spans : 4

Spans 1 2 3 4

Deck Element Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings

Condi tion Rating Wearing Surface 3 3 3 3

3

2 2 2 8

3

3

Federa l Suffi c iency Rating Curb 5 5 5 5Genera l Recommendation Sidewa lk, Fascia s 5 5 5 5

AbutmentBegin Ratings

End Ratings Ra i l ing, Parapets 5 5 5 5

Joint with Deck 8 8 Scuppers 8 8 8 8

Bearings , Bol ts , Pads 5 5 Gra tings 8 8 8 8

Sea ts and Pedesta l s 6 6 Median 8 8 8 8

Backwa l l 5 5 Mono Deck Surface 8 8 8 8

Stem (Breas twa l l ) 8 8 Superstructure Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings

Eros ion or Scour 5 5 Structura l Deck 4 4 4 4

Footing 9 9 Primary Members 5 4 5

Pi les 8 8 Secondary Members 8 5 5 8

Recommendation 5 5 Pa int 6 5 6 6

WingwallBegin Ratings

End Ratings Joints

Wa l l s 6 6 Recommendation 4 4 4 5

Footing 9 9 Pier Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings

Eros ion or Scour 5 5 Bearings , Bol ts , Pads 4 4 4 8

Pi les 8 8 Pedes ta l s 6 6 4 8

Channel Top of Cap or Beam 6 6 5 8

Stream Al ignment Stem Sol id Pier 8 8 8 8

Eros ion and Scour Cap Beam 6 6 6 8

Water Opening Pier Columns 6 6 6 8

Bank Protection Footing 9 9 9 8

Approach Eros ion or Scour 6 6 6 8

Dra inage Pi les 8 8 8 8

Embankment Recommendation 5 5 5 8

Settlement Utility Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings

Eros ion Lighting 8 6 8

Pavement Sign Structure 8 5 4 8

Guide Ra i l ing Uti l i ties and Support 5 6 6 5

5

4.266

49.1

4

Overall Ratings

Ratings

8

8

8

8

Ratings

5

5

5

4 Load Rating and Fatigue Analysis – A Virtis Level 2 analysis of the steel superstructure, calculated by the biennial consultant in March of 2012, indicates that the steel has an Inventory Rating of 23 tons for H 20, and 31 tons for HS 20. The Operating Rating for H 20 is 38 tons, and for HS 20, is 51 tons. New load rating calculations are not required since the existing load rating reflects as-inspected conditions of the bridge that are consistent with what was found during the 2012 biennial inspection. The Span 3 fascia girder is the governing member under flexural strength. Restrictions – None

9


Waterway – None 2.3.3.10 Hydraulics of Bridges and Culverts – There are no bridge scuppers with down spouts. 15-inch diameter CMP culverts connect the east side and west side drainage catch basins at each end of the bridge, just beyond the two bridge abutments. From the west side catch basins, a 15-inch diameter CMP culvert outlets to the LIE. The bridge does not cross over any waterways within the project limits. Drainage will be designed as needed for the required storm runoff, making use of existing drainage systems in the approaches with any retrofit or repairs, and/or new drainage systems will be installed in the bridge approaches if current design standards and condition of the existing system makes that necessary. 2.3.3.11 Utilities – Continuity of all utility services will be maintained throughout the project’s construction duration.

Exhibit 2.6 Utilities

Owner Type Location Work to be Performed

Dix Hills Water 8 inch diameter buried water main

west of the bridge and parallel to bridge going

under the LIE none anticipated

LIPA overhead Electric power lines

west and overhead of the bridge relocation anticipated

LIPA sidewalk encased steel ducts (4 - 4 inch dia.)

for lighting in easterly sidewalk removed and replaced

Verizon sidewalk encased fiber ducts (6 - 3.5 inch dia.)

for Telephone in westerly sidewalk remove and replace

remove and re-install for new bridge mounted

signs INFORM conduit for bridge

mounted sign lighting along both sidewalk

fascias

replace with current standard ground

mounted highway light poles, per signed Utility

Agreement

Town of Huntington street lighting and bracket arms

in bridge approach, westerly side (lights

mounted to wood utility poles)

coordinate and insure no impact by installation of approach sidewalks,

curbs, or signal intersection poles with

footing, and/or pedestrian activated

signal control poles with footing.

National Grid & other private owner natural gas lines

along the LIE service road shoulders at the

proposed bridge approach work limits

Northville Industries Gas Transmission (high pressure)

along south shoulder of north LIE service road

running thru intersection protect and maintain

10


11

2.3.3.12 Guide Railing, Median Barriers and Impact Attenuators Box beam guide railing runs along Carlls Straight Path on each side of the approaches from the service roads to the bridge, except for the east side of the north approach where there is W-beam corrugated guide railing. The project will replace all approach guide railing to current standards. Incidental reconstruction of the LIE center median and safety barrier systems affected by the bridge pier demolition and replacement with new pier substructure will be necessary. 2.3.3.13 Right of Way – Right of way acquisition is not required for this project. 2.3.3.14 Landscaping/Environmental Enhancement – There will be some localized removal by clearing and grubbing of trees and vegetation, along the bridge approach side sloped embankments as necessary to construct the wider replacement bridge and install the highway safety appurtenances (guide railings) and municipal operated and maintained road lighting that is also in the bridge approaches (along the westerly side). Some additional tree or shrub landscaping may be desirable as a visual buffer from the southerly located LIE drainage retention basin berms. The Regional Landscape Architect should be consulted before planting plans are developed. 2.4 Miscellaneous – NYS Smart Growth Public Infrastructure Policy Act (SGPIPA): Pursuant to ECL Article 6, this project is compliant with the New York State Smart Growth Public Infrastructure Policy Act (SGPIPA). This project has been determined to meet the relevant criteria, to the extent practicable, described in ECL Sec. 6-0107. Specifically, the project:

• improves existing infrastructure by replacing the Carlls Straight Path Bridge over I-495 to provide 14ft- 6 inch minimum vertical clearance, providing standard shoulder and sidewalk widths, extending center turn lane across bridge, and replacing pedestrian push button controlled crossing systems and traffic control systems at the North and South Service Roads

• is located in a developed area • provides mobility through transportation choices because the project improves bicycle and

pedestrian facilities to help promote public transit use and reduce automobile dependency • is consistent with local, county, regional and state plans

To the extent practicable this project has met the relevant criteria as described in ECL § 6-0107. The Smart Growth Screening Tool was used to assess the project’s consistency and alignment with relevant Smart Growth criteria; the tool was completed by the Region’s Planning and Program Management group on 8/23/2013 and reflects the current project scope. Railroads: There are no rail roads within the project limits and no at-grade crossings within 1 km that could impact traffic conditions. Parking: There are no areas regulated by parking restrictions within the project limits. Lighting: There is municipal street lighting within the highway limits along the west side of Carlls Straight Path. These lights are owned and maintained by the Town of Huntington. Coordination with the Town will be required during final design to determine lighting requirements and the need for any relocation.


CHAPTER 3 – SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Refer to the Environmental Checklist included in Appendix B for information on all environmental issues for which the project was screened. 3.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): The Department has determined that this project is a NEPA Class II, Programmatic Categorical Exclusion in accordance with 23 CFR 771.117d and the NEPA checklist. Class II actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant environmental effect are excluded from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or an Environmental Assessment (EA). Refer to the attached NEPA Assessment Checklist and supplemental information in Appendix B. Programmatic Categorical Exclusions do not require FHWA’s concurrence.

3.2 State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) New York State Department of Transportation is the SEQRA lead agency as per 17 NYCRR Part 15 “Procedures for Implementation of State Environmental Quality Review Act”, Section 15.5. The Department has determined that this project is a SEQRA Type II Action in accordance with 17 NYCRR, Part 15. No further SEQRA processing is required. The project has been identified as a Type II action, per 17 NYCRR Section 15.14, Subdivision (e), Item 37, Paragraph (iv). This permits the project to be classified as Type II since the project does not violate any of the criteria contained in subdivision (d) of Section 15.14, and is of a scale and scope illustrated by the following:

replacement, reconstruction or rehabilitation, at present site or immediately adjacent thereto, of existing bridges, culverts or other transportation structures, including railroad crossing structures, not involving substantial expansion of the structure;

Specifically, the project does not include or result in: 1. The acquisition of an occupied dwelling or business structure; 2. Significant changes in passenger or vehicle traffic volumes, vehicle mix, local travel patterns or

access; 3. More than minor social, economic or environmental effects upon occupied dwelling units,

businesses, abutting properties or other established human activities; 4. Significant inconsistency with current plans or goals that have been adopted by local government

bodies; 5. Physical alteration of more than 1 ha (2.5 ac) of publicly owned or operated park land, recreational

area or designated open space; 6. An effect on a district, building, structure or site eligible for, or listed on, the National Register of

Historic Places; 7. More than minor alteration of, or adverse effect upon, any property, protected area, or natural or

man-made resource of national, State or local significance, including but not limited to:

1


2

(i) Wetlands and associated areas; (ii) Floodplains; (iii) Prime or unique agricultural land; (iv) Agricultural districts, when more than one acre may be affected; (v) Water resources, including lakes, reservoirs, rivers and streams; (vi) Water supply sources; (vii) Designated wild, scenic and recreational rivers; (viii) Unique ecological, natural wooded or scenic areas; (ix) Rare, threatened or endangered species; (x) Any area designated as a critical environmental area; 8. Requirement for an indirect air source quality permit. 3.3 Additional Environmental Information – Endangered or Threatened Species According to the Department’s GIS information database, there are no Federally-protected, threatened, or endangered species located in or within ½ mile of the proposed project area. Furthermore there is no suitable habitat in the proposed work limits for the federally endangered species listed in the US Fish & Wildlife Service’s “County List” for Suffolk County. Invasive Species In conformance with Presidential Executive Order 13112 and NYSDOT EI 09-001, the project site has been screened for the presence of NYSDOT’s target invasive species. Each side of the bridge right-of-way comprises typical highway environment plant species dominated by a mix of native and non-native species, both planted and voluntary. The most prevalent tree species are Black cherry, Scarlet oak, Black locust, Norway maple, Autumn olive and crab apple. A few Red cedars, Japanese black pine, Tree-of-heaven and Willow oak were also noted. The shrub layer is minimal but includes mostly Multiflora rose and Japanese honeysuckle. The herbaceous/vine layer comprises mostly Poison ivy, Virginia creeper, English ivy and Oriental bittersweet. “Target” invasive species were not found during the field screening. Although many of the observed plant species are considered undesirable non-natives they are not target invasive plants and therefore will not be managed using specific NYSDOT specifications for removal and disposal. Replacement vegetation for the new bridge slopes shall only include plant species that are not listed on NYS regional invasive plant lists (i.e., LIISMA). Asbestos-Containing Materials An Asbestos Screening and Assessment of the impacted right-of-way and structures was performed by a NYS Department of Labor licensed firm using certified inspection staff. Asbestos-containing materials identified during this screening/assessment were sampled and positively analyzed for asbestos content; suspect asbestos-containing materials are presumed positive. The complete Asbestos Assessment Report dated August 2013 is available in the project file. All confirmed and presumed asbestos-containing materials impacted as part of the project work will be removed and disposed of in accordance with NYSDOT Standard Specification Section 210 and all applicable State and Federal Regulations


APPENDICES


APPENDIX A Plans, Profiles & Typical Sections

INDEX

INDEX AND ABBREVIATIONS

LEGEND, LINE AND POINT SYMBOLOGY

PLAN

TYPICAL SECTIONS

PROFILE

DESCRIPTION DRAWING NUMBERNUMBER

SHEET

LEG-01 TO LEG-02

INDEX

TYP-01 TO TYP-05

GNP-01 TO GNP-03

PRO-01 TO PRO-03

4-8

2-3

1

9-11

12-14

TOTAL NUMBER OF SHEETS 14 E

EMH

G

GP

GSB

GV

HYD

LP

LPG

PP

SA

SMH

ST

T

TCB

TELBOX

TEL P

TMH

CTV

W

WSB

WV

AHEAD

AZIMUTH

BACK

BASELINE

BEARING

CENTERLINE

CURVE TO SPIRAL

SUPERELEVATION RATE (CROSS SLOPE)

EQUALITY

EXTERNAL

HORIZONTAL CONTROL LINE

HEADLIGHT SIGHT DISTANCE

LENGTH OF CIRCULAR CURVE

LENGTH OF SPIRAL

LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVE

CENTER CORRECTION OF VERTICAL CURVE

MAIN LINE

POINT OF CURVATURE

POINT OF INTERSECTION

POINT ON LINE

PASSING SIGHT DISTANCE

POINT OF TANGENT

POINT OF VERTICAL CURVE

POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION

POINT OF VERTICAL TANGENT

RADIUS

SPIRAL TO CURVE

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE

SPIRAL TO TANGENT

STATION

TANGENT LENGTH

THEORETICAL GRADE LINE

TANGENT TO SPIRAL

VERTICAL CURVE

ELECTRIC

ELECTRIC MANHOLE

GAS

GUY POLE

GAS SERVICE BOX (HOUSE LINE)

GAS VALVE (MAIN LINE)

HYDRANT

LIGHT POLE

LOW PRESSURE GAS

POWER POLE

SANITARY SEWER

SANITARY MANHOLE

STORM SEWER

TELEPHONE

TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX

TELEPHONE BOX

TELEPHONE POLE

TELEPHONE MANHOLE

CABLE TELEVISION

WATER

WATER SERVICE BOX (HOUSE LINE)

WATER VALVE (MAIN LINE)

ALIGNMENT

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

HAND AUGER

DRILLING MUD

HOLLOW FLIGHT AUGER

POWER AUGER

PROBE

PERCOLATION TEST HOLE

TO BE DEFINED AT THE TIME OF EXPLORATION

SEISMIC POINT

TEST PIT

BRIDGE

CUT

DAM

FILL

CULVERT

WALL

AH

CP

DA

DM

DN

FH

PA

PH

PT

SP

B

C

D

F

K

W

X

IS MADE

BE DEFINED AT THE TIME THE EXPLORATION

TO BE USED IF ONE OF THE ABOVE CANNOT

ABUT

AOBE

ASPH

BDY

BLDG

BM

CC

CONC

CONST

CR

D

DM

DWY

EP

ES

FP

FD

FL

GAR

GR

HO

HWY

IP

MB

MON

N&W

OG

O/H

P

PAV’T

PE

PED POLE

p

POR

RR

RTE

ROW

FEE WO/A

ABUTMENT

AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER

ASPHALT

BOUNDARY

BUILDING

BENCH MARK

CENTER TO CENTER

CONCRETE

CONSTRUCTION

COUNTY ROAD

DEED DISTANCE

DIRECT MEASUREMENT

DRIVEWAY

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

EDGE OF SHOULDER

FENCE POST

FOUNDATION

FENCE LINE

GARAGE

GRAVEL

HOUSE

HIGHWAY

IRON PIN OR IRON PIPE

MAILBOX

MONUMENT

NAIL AND WASHER

ORIGINAL GROUND

OVERHEAD

PARCEL

PAVEMENT

PERMANENT EASEMENT

PEDESTRIAN POLE

PROPERTY LINE

PORCH

RAILROAD

ROUTE

RIGHT OF WAY

TOPOGRAPHY (MISCELLANEOUS)

RW

SH

SHLDR

RETAINING WALL

STATE HIGHWAY

SHOULDER

BOTTOM OF BANK (STREAM)

BOTTOM OF CURB

BOTTOM OF OPENING

CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE

CATCH BASIN

CAST IRON PIPE

CENTERLINE OF STREAM

CORRUGATED METAL PIPE

CONCRETE PIPE

BB

BC

BO

CAP

CB

CIP

CMP

CP

CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE

CULVERT

DIAMETER

DRAINAGE MANHOLE

DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PIPE

DITCH CROSSING

EXTREME HIGH WATER

ELEVATION

ELEVATION

EXTREME LOW WATER

END SECTION

HEADWALL

INVERT

MANHOLE

MEAN HIGH WATER

ORDINARY HIGH WATER

ORDINARY LOW WATER

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

TOP OF BANK (STREAM)

TOP OF CURB

TOP OF GRATE

VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE

CSP

CULV

DIA

DMH

DS

D’XING

EHW

EL

ELEV

ELW

ES

HW

INV

MH

MHW

OHW

OLW

RCP

TB

TC

TG

VCP

SPK

ST

STK

STY

SW

TE

TO

U/G

WW

SPIKE

STREET

STAKE

STORY

SIDEWALK

TEMPORARY EASEMENT

TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY

UNDERGROUND

WING WALL

AH

AZ

BK

b

BRG

c

CS

e

EQ

EXT

HCL

HSD

L

LS

LVC

E

f

PC

PI

POL

PSD

PT

PVC

PVI

PVT

R

SC

SSD

ST

STA

T

TGL

TS

VC

FEE ACQUISITION WITHOUT ACCESS

FEE FEE ACQUISITION

ABBR. DESCRIPTION

REPLACE ABBREVIATION "AB" WITH:

ABBR. DESCRIPTION

ABBR. DESCRIPTION ABBR. DESCRIPTION

ABBR. DESCRIPTION

UTILITIES

TOPOGRAPHY (DRAINAGE)

4 INCHES CASED DRILL HOLE

1 INCH SAMPLER (RETRACTABLE PLUG)

2� INCHES CASED DRILL HOLE

SICPP SMOOTH INTERIOR CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE

STRMc

RP

TP

SQUARE FEET

GALLON

’

mi

lb LB

MI

(PLANS)

SYMBOL

STANDARD

(SPECS/PROPOSAL)

NOMENCLATURE:

EQUIVALENT

ftq

YDr CUBIC YARDCY

MILES

ACRES

LINEAR FEET

TON TON TON

GAL

POUND

GAL

SF

AC AC

QUANTITIES SHEET

ESTIMATE OF

ITEM PAYMENT UNIT:

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

US

ER

=areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION

BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K

ALL DIMENSIONS IN ft UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

" - INCHES

YDq SQUARE YARDSY

LF

CONE PENTROMETER

DA, DM, DN, AND FH WITH:

ABBREVIATION "C" IN CATEGORIES:

1

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_in

d.d

gn

CARLLS STRAIGHT PATH ROAD OVER I-495

TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

INDEX AND ABBREVIATIONS SHEET

INDEX

022940_cph_ind.dgn

10

14

SUFFOLK

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

US

ER

=areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K


HAVE CORRESPONDING EXISTING FEATURES.

FEATURES SHOWN AT THE HEAVIER WEIGHT ARE PROPOSED ONLY AND DO NOT

BE LABELED ON THE PLANS.

SYMBOLOGY (SUCH AS THE PAVEMENT EDGE, PAVEMENT EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY) AND SHOULD

MAPPING FEATURES NOT INCLUDED ON THE LEGEND SHEET DO NOT HAVE A UNIQUE

DRAWINGS).

LINE WEIGHT. LINE WEIGHT FOR PROPOSED FEATURES IS THICKER (0.015 in ON B SIZE

PROPOSED FEATURE SYMBOLOGY IS IDENTICAL TO EXISTING FEATURE SYMBOLOGY EXCLUDING

CORRESPONDING PROPOSED FEATURES.

FEATURES SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AS EXISTING FEATURES ALSO HAVE

UTILITY LINES, ETC.) OR POINT (SIGN, UTILITY POLE, ETC.).

FEATURES ARE SHOWN AS EITHER LINEAR (ROADWAY GUIDERAIL, ROADWAY SIDEWALK,

THE LEGEND ILLUSTRATES MAPPING FEATURES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED).

ALIGNMENT

CONTROL

DRAINAGE

ENVIRONMENTAL

LANDSCAPE

ROW MAPPING

STRIPING

TRAFFIC CONTROL

AC

AD_P

AT_P

CONTROL (CENTERLINE)

DETOUR

CB

CBPR

DCP

DCP_P

DDG_P

DDP_P

DDS_P

DFL_P

EBLHS

ECT

EDMC

CURTAIN, TURBIDITY

FLOW LINE

DITCH, STONE LINED

DITCH, PAVED INVERT

DITCH, GRASS LINED

CULVERT PIPE (DIR)

CULVERT PIPE

BASELINE

BASELINE, PROJECTION

SHEET PILING

EFNS

EFNV

EWAA_P

EWFS

EWM

EWS WETLAND, STATE

WETLAND, MITIGATION AREA

WETLAND, FEDERAL

WETLAND, ADJACENT AREA

FENCE, VEGETATION

FENCE, SILT

EDMEC_P

EDMPC_P

EDMSC_P

LABL

LAHR

LAPB

LAWA

LAWE

LFILL_P

LFNC

LTRC

LTRD

LWR

LWS

AREA, BRUSH LINE

AREA, HEDGE ROW

AREA, PLANTING BED

AREA, WATERS EDGE

FILL LIMIT

FENCE

TREE ROW, CONIFEROUS

WALL, RETAINING

TREE ROW, DECIDUOUS

WALL, STONE

MDL

MEE

HIGHWAY BOUNDARY

EASEMENT, EXISTING

DEED LINE

RG

RRPLS_P

RRPSS

RRSLS_P

BROKEN LINE

TCSW SIGNAL, SPAN WIRE

UC

TRANSITION CONTROL

SIGNS

SM

SSO

SSOC

MULTIPLE POST

STRUCTURE, OVERHEAD

RRS RUMBLE STRIP

DSSD SLOTTED DRAIN

STB*

EWF

STYLE NAME DESCRIPTION

BRIDGE

BR RAIL

BSHT

FENCE, SILT & VEGETATIONEFNSV

WETLAND, FEDERAL AND STATE

SBLB BILLBOARDS

STRUCTURE, OVHD. CANTILEVER

DESCRIPTIONNAMESTYLE

AREA, WOODED AREA OUTLINE

LWH WALL, H PILE

MEP_P EASEMENT, PERMANENT

MEPA_P EASEMENT, PERMANENT, APPROX.

MET_P EASEMENT, TEMPORARY

META_P EASEMENT. TEMPORARY, APPROX.

MF_P

MFA_P FEE ACQUISITION, APPROXIMATE

MFS_P FEE ACQUISITION, SHAPE

MHB

MHBA HIGHWAY BOUNDARY, APPROX.

MHBW HWY BOUNDARY, FACE OF WALL

MHBWOA HIGHWAY BOUNDARY, W/O ACCESS

MJC JURISDICTION, CITY

MJCY JURISDICTION, COUNTY

MJHD JURISDICTION, HISTORIC DISTRICT

MJLL JURIS., (GREAT, MILITARY) LOT LINE

MJN JURISDICTION, NATION

MJPB JURISDICTION, PUBLIC LANDS

MJS JURISDICTION, STATE

MJT JURISDICTION, TOWN

MJV JURISDICTION, VILLAGE

MPL PROPERTY LOT LINE

PROPERTY LOT LINE, APPROXIMATEMPLA

MSL SUB LOT LINE

ROADWAY

DESCRIPTIONNAMESTYLE

GUIDE RAIL, MISCELLANEOUS

RGB GUIDE RAIL, BOX BEAM

RGBM GUIDE RAIL, BOX BEAM, MEDIAN

RGC GUIDE RAIL, CABLE

RGCB GUIDE RAIL, CONCRETE BARRIER

GUIDE POST

RGW GUIDE RAIL, W BEAM

RGWM GUIDE RAIL, W BEAM, MEDIAN

RPB PARKING BUMPER

RRC RAIL ROAD, CATENARY

RRER RAIL ROAD, 3RD RAIL

RAIL, PHOTO, LARGE SCALE

RAIL, PHOTO, SMALL SCALE

RAIL, SURVEY, LARGE SCALE

RRSSS RAIL, SURVEY, SMALL SCALE

RGP_P

DOUBLE BROKEN LINESTDB*

STDL* DOTTED LINE LONG

STDS* DOTTED LINE SHORT

STFB* FULL BARRIER LINE

STH* HATCH LINE

STPB* PARTIAL BARRIER LINE

STRCT ROUNDABOUT, CAT TRACKS

STRYL ROUNDABOUT, YIELD LINE

STSB STOP BAR

SOLID, EDGE

X WALK, LADDER LINE

* = W (WHITE) OR Y (YELLOW)

CONDUIT, UNDERGROUND

UCH CONDUIT, HANGING

UCO CONDUIT, OVERHEAD

UE ELECTRIC LINE, UNDERGROUND

UEH ELECTRIC LINE, HANGING

UEO ELECTRIC LINE, OVERHEAD

UESS ELECTRIC, SUBSTATIONS

UFO FIBER OPTIC, UNDERGROUND

UFOH FIBER OPTIC, HANGING

UFOO FIBER OPTIC, OVERHEAD

UG GAS, UNDERGROUND

UGH GAS, HANGING

UGO GAS, OVERHEAD

UIC INFORM CABLE, UNDERGROUND

UICH INFORM CABLE, HANGING

OIL LINE, UNDERGROUNDUO

UOH OIL LINE, HANGING

UPBP POLE, BRACE, PUSH BRACE

POLE, GUY WIRE

USA

USAH SANITARY SEWER, HANGING

SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND

UT TELEPHONE, UNDERGROUND

UTH TELEPHONE, HANGING

UTO TELEPHONE, OVERHEAD

UUU UNKNOWN, UNDERGROUND

UUH UNKNOWN, HANGING

UUO UNKNOWN, OVERHEAD

UW WATER LINE, UNDERGROUND

UWH WATER LINE, HANGING

UWO WATER LINE, OVERHEAD

UTILITIES

UETO ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION, OVERHEAD

USAF SANITARY SEWER, FORCE MAIN, UGND

USAFH SANITARY SEWER, FORCE MAIN, HANG

UTV

UTVH

UTVO

CABLE TV, UNDERGROUND

CABLE TV, HANGING

CABLE TV, OVERHEAD

FEE ACQUISITION, W/ ACCESS

BALE, STRAW

LCUT_P CUT LIMIT

STYLE NAME DESCRIPTION

UPGW

STSE*

RCZ_P

BARRIER, TEMPORARY

TRAFFIC WORK ZONE

TWZBT_P

CHANNELIZING DEVICETWZCD_P

TWZPMRC_P

TWZBTWL_P

MHA HISTORICAL, ACQUISITION

MFWOA_P FEE ACQUISITION, W/O ACCESS

CLEAR ZONE

UNDERDRAINDUD_P

STXLB X WALK, LADDER BAR LINE

EDMGSC_P

LIGHTS

BARRIER, TEMPORARY, W/ WARNING

COVERING

PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL OR

STXL

DAM, COFFER

DAM, EARTHEN CHECK

DAM, GRAVEL BAG/SAND BAG CHECK

DAM, PREFABRICATED CHECK

DAM, STONE CHECK

2

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

LEG-01

10

LEGEND SHEET - LINES

022940_cph_le

g_01.d

gn

022940_cph_leg_01.dgn

SUFFOLK

CBP

CBPOL

CBSP

CBTP

ACC

ACOGO

ACS

AEQN

AEQNAHD

AEQNBK

AEVT

APC

APCC

API

APOB

APOC

APOE

APOL

APOS

APOT

APOVC

APOVT

APORC

APT

APVC

APVCC

APVI

APVRC

APVT

ASC

ASPI

ASTS

AVEVT

AVHIGH

AVLOW

CENTER OF CURVATURE

COGO

CURVE TO SPIRAL

EQUATION

EQUATION AHEAD

EQUATION BACK

EVENT STATION

SPIRAL TO CURVE

SPIRAL TO SPIRAL

SPIRAL TO TANGENT

TANGENT TO SPIRAL

ALIGNMENT

DINV

DS

BRIDGE, SCUPPER

STRUCTURE, RECTANGULAR

INVERT

TRAP, SEDIMENT

WETLAND FLAG

DRILL HOLE

ELEVATION, SPOT

FLAG POLE

MAILBOX

PAPER BOX

ROCK, BOULDER

SHRUB, CONIFEROUS

SHRUB, DECIDUOUS

TREE, CONIFEROUS

TREE, DECIDUOUS

TREE, STUMP

SINGLE POST

DELINEATORS

REFERENCE MARKERS

EWFG

GDH

LELS

LFP

LMB

LPB

LPST

LRB

LSHC

LSHD

LTC

LTD

LTS

LUKP

LANDSCAPE

GEOTECHNICAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

SDEL

SRM

SANTENNAS

CABINET & PAD

CCTV SITE

CDPD TRANSCEIVER

CELL PHONE TOWER

CONDUIT JACK OR BORING

CONTROLLER CABINET

COMMUNICATION PULL BOX

CONDUIT TURNING DOWN

CONDUIT TURNING UP

DEFAULT

TRANSMITTAL READER

FUSION SPLICE

HAR ADVISORY SIGN

HAR SITE

LOAD CENTER

MECHANICAL SPLICE

PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD

RAMP METER

SOLAR PANEL

WEIGHT IN MOTION DETECTOR

WIRELESS VIDEO REPEATER

WIRELESS VIDEO RECEIVER

WIRELESS VIDEO TRANSMITTER

PERM. OVERHEAD VMS

PERM. VMS

ACCOU. SPEED/COUNT SNSR.S

IANT P

IASCTS

ICABPAD

ICCTV

ICDPD

ICELLT

ICJB

ICNTLCAB

ICPB

ICTD

ICTU

ICVTRT

IEZR

IEZTR

IFOXCAB

IFUSSPL

IHARADV

IHARST

IMECSPL

IMSCS

IMSCTS

IMT

IOVHVMS

IPASCS

IPEDS

IPSS

IPVMS

IRM

IRWIS

ISP

ISST

ITDB

ITP

IVTRT

IWIMD

IWVR

IWVTT

IWVRC

ILC

ITS

GAS, METER

GAS, MANHOLE

GAS, LINE MARKER

GAS/FUEL PUMP

GAS, VALVE

GAS, VENT

LIGHTING, POLE

LIGHTING, POLE, MEDIAN

LIGHTING, POLE, PED.

MISC. FILLER CAP

OIL, LINE MARKER

TELEPHONE, LINE MARKER

TELEPHONE, MANHOLE

CABLE TV, LINE MARKER

CABLE TV, PULL BOX

UNKNOWN, MANHOLE

UNKNOWN, VALVE

WATER, FIRE HYDRANT

WATER, METER

WATER, MANHOLE

WATER, VALVE

WATER, WELL

UGM

UGMH

UGLM

UGP

UGV

UGVT

ULP

ULPM

ULPP

UMFC

UOLM

UP

UPD

UPL

USMH

UTB

UTLM

UTMH

UTVPB

UUJB

UUMH

UUVL

UWFH

UWM

UWMH

UWV

UWW

G

G

O

P

T

C

C

W

W

SPM PARKING METER

SPREAD SPECT. TRANSCEIVER

TELEPHONE DEMARCATION BLK

SUBSURFACE TEMP. PROBE

MICRO SPEED & COUNT SENSOR

A

B

UNKNOWN, JUNCTION BOX

UTVLM

POST, SINGLE

FP

S

T

W

UUB UNKNOWN, BOX

UUPB UNKNOWN, PULL BOX

UUVT UNKNOWN, VENT

U UUW UNKNOWN, WELL

PT., WALL LOCATION

PT., TREE W/ WIRE

PT., STAKE

PT., RAILROAD SPIKE

PT., SPIKE

PT., NAIL

PT., MONUMENT, MISC.

PT., MONUMENT

PT., IRON ROD

PT., IRON PIPE

PT., FENCE LOCATION

PT., DRILL HOLE

HISTORICAL, BLDG. CORNERS

HIGHWAY BNDRY., APPROX.

HIGHWAY BNDRY, PT.

EASEMENT, PERM., SHAPE

DEED LINE, TYPE 1

DEED LINE, TYPE 2

DEED LINE, TYPE 3

DEED LINE, TYPE 4

DEED LINE, TYPE 5

EASEMENT, EXISTING

EASEMENT, PERM., APPROX.

BOX, JUNCTION

BOX, PULL BOX

BOX, SPLICE

MICROCOMPUTER CABINET

PED POLE

SIGNAL HEADS

SIGNAL POLE

ROW MAPPING

MDL1P

MHBCP

MPCC

MPDH

MPF

MPIP

MPIR

MPM

MPMM

MPN

MPRS

MPSP

MPST

MPTW

MPWL

TRAFFIC CONTROL

TCMC

TCPP

TCSH

TCSP

C

ELECTRIC, BOX

ELECTRIC, METER

ELECTRIC, MANHOLE

ELECTRIC, POLE, TRANS.

UEB

UEM

UEMH

UEPT

E

E

E

MJCP PT., JURIS. CITY

PT., CROSS CUT

UTILITIES

EASEMENT, PERM., BACK LINEEASEMENT, PERM., BACK LINE

DSMTXX_P

1

2

3

4

5

MEPAP_P

EIOP_P

ETRS_P

ADPI_P

G

A

A

P

CDPD

C

C

IDEFAULT

EZ

EZ-T

XC

H

LC

PM

M

M

VMS

PA

PVMS

RM

RWIS

SS

TC

TP

WVR

V

V

CELL DESCRIPTION CELL CELL CELLDESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

DETOUR, POINT OF INTERSECT.

DETOUR, POINT ON LINE

POINT OF CURVATURE

POINT OF INTERSECTION

POINT OF BEGINNING

POINT OF CURVATURE

POINT OF END

POINT ON LINE

POINT ON SPIRAL

POINT ON TANGENT

POINT ON VERTICAL CURVE

POINT ON VERTICAL TANGENT

POINT ON REVERSE CURVE

POINT OF TANGENCY

POINT OF VERTICAL CURVATURE

POINT OF VERT. INTERSECTION

POINT OF VERT. REVERSE CURVE

POINT OF VERTICAL TANGENCY

SPIRAL POINT OF INTERSECTION

VERTICAL EVENT POINT

VERTICAL HIGH POINT

BASELINE, POINT

BASELINE, POINT ON LINE

BSC

RISER, CONCRETE BOXERCB

LTW P TREE, WELL OR WALL

UNKNOWN POINT

SINGLE POST, PROPOSED

BACK TO BACK, PROPOSED

RFM

NAMENAME NAME NAME

SRSC3

SRSC4

SRSCT2

SRSCT4

SRSI

SRSN2

SRSN3

SRSS2

SRSS3

SRSS4

A

A

FEE ACQUISITION, SHAPE

A

MPBC PT., BUILDING CORNER

DESCRIPTIONNAMECELL

POLE, WITH UTILITY

POLE, DEAD (NO UTILITY)

POLE, WITH LIGHT

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

TELEPHONE, BOOTH

DSI STRUCTURE, INVERT

DSM STRUCTURE, MANHOLE

DSR STRUCTURE, ROUND

DST"X"CB P

STRUCTURE, RECT., TYPE "X"DST"X" P

CELL NAME DESCRIPTION

ROW ACQUISITION

MFS_P_T

PE

MEPS_P_T EASEMENT, PERMANENT

TE

METS_P_T EASEMENT, TEMPORARY

TO

METS_P_T OCCUPANCY, TEMPORARY

MFS_P_TFEE WO/A

P1

M1

M1

P1

M1

P1

M1

P1

M1

P1

FEE

FEE ACQUISITION

BRIDGE

CONTROL

TRAFFIC WORK ZONE

COMM. VEH. ROAD TRANSCEIVER

E-ZPASS READER

MICROWAVE TRANSCEIVER

PORT. ACCOU. SPD & CNT. SENSOR

VEHICLE TO RDWY TRANSCEIVER

PORT. SPEED & COUNT SENSOR

FIBER OPTIC X-CONNECT CABINET

PAVEMENT SURFACE SENSOR

RDWY WEATHER INFO. SENSOR

TWZBCD_P

GUIDE RAIL, ANCHOR

GUIDE POST, SINGLE

ROADWAY

RES P

RGA

RGP

ELEVATION, SPOT

SIGNS

TWZCMS_P CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN (PVMS)

TWZFLG_P FLAGGER

TWZFT_P FLAG TREE

TWZIA_P

TWZSDT_P

TWZAP_P ARROW PANEL

TWZAPC_P ARROW PANEL, CAUTION MODE

TWZAPT_P ARROW PANEL, TRAILER OR SUPPORT

TWZWVA_P

SYMBOL, DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

TWZSDTD_P

LUMINAIRE (TEMPORARY)

TWZSGN_P SIGN (TEMPORARY)

TWZSIG_P

TWZWL_P WARNING LIGHT

TWZWV_P WORK VEHICLE

BARRICADE (TYPE III)

TWZLUM_P

CPBM BENCHMARK

GB

SF

H/S

WIM

PRFB

CULV

POINT, HORIZ. PHOTOGRAMMETRY

POINT, SURVEY MARKER, PERM.

CPSV

CPSM

CPH

DRAINAGE

S_P

SB_P

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

US

ER

=areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K


ATS

AST

SHLD, INTERSTATE

SHLD, NATIONAL, 2 DIG.

SHLD, NATIONAL, 3 DIG.

SHLD, STATE, 2 DIG.

SHLD, STATE, 3 DIG.

SHLD, STATE, 4 DIG.

SHLD, CTY, 123 DIG.

SHLD, CTY, 4 DIG.

SHLD, CTY TOUR, 1-2 DIG.

SHLD, CTY TOUR, 3-4 DIG.

STR., INLET PROT., GRAVEL BAG

STR., INLET PROT., HAY/STRAW

STR., INLET PROT., PREFAB.

STR., INLET PROT., SILT FENCE

STR., INLET, OUTLET PROT.

"XX" = 48, 60, 72, 96

MDL2P

MDL3P

MDL4P

MDL5P

MEEP

MHBP

TCBJ

TCBP

TCBS

MEPP_P

MEPSP_P

MFAP_P

MFP_P

MFSP_P

EIPGB_P

EIPHS_P

EIPP_P

EIPSF_P

ADPL_P

POINT OF C0MPOUND CURVATURE

POINT OF VERT. CMPND CURVE

VERTICAL LOW POINT

BASELINE, SPUR POINT

BASELINE, TIE POINT

FEE ACQUISITION, BACK LINE

FEE ACQUISITION, APPROX.

MHBAP

TYPE "XX"

STRUCTURE, MANHOLE,

TYPE "X"

STRUCTURE, RECT., WITH CURB

"X" = I, K, L, M, O, P, U

"X" = F, G, N, O, P, R

FEE ACQUISITION W/O ACCESS

CRASH CUSHION (TEMPORARY)

IMPACT ATTENUATOR /

TRAFFIC DETOUR

SYMBOL, DIRECTION OF TEMPORARY

(TEMPORARY)

SIGNAL, TRAFFIC OR PEDESTRIAN

MOUNTED ATTENUATOR

WORK VEHICLE WITH TRUCK

POINT, VERT., PHOTOGRAMMETRY

v CORRESPONDING EXISTING FEATURES.

6. FEATURES SHOWN AT THE HEAVIER WEIGHT ARE PROPOSED ONLY AND DO NOT HAVE

v SHOULD BE LABELED ON THE PLANS.

v SYMBOLOGY (SUCH AS THE PAVEMENT EDGE, PAVEMENT EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY) AND

5. MAPPING FEATURES NOT INCLUDED ON THE LEGEND SHEET DO NOT HAVE A UNIQUE

v (0.015 in ON B SIZE DRAWINGS).

v EXCLUDING LINE WEIGHT. LINE WEIGHT FOR PROPOSED FEATURES IS THICKER

4. PROPOSED FEATURE SYMBOLOGY IS IDENTICAL TO EXISTING FEATURE SYMBOLOGY

v CORRESPONDING PROPOSED FEATURES.

3. FEATURES SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AS EXISTING FEATURES ALSO HAVE

v UTILITY LINES, ETC.) OR POINT (SIGN, UTILITY POLE, ETC.).

2. FEATURES ARE SHOWN AS EITHER LINEAR (ROADWAY GUIDERAIL, ROADWAY SIDEWALK,

1. THE LEGEND ILLUSTRATES MAPPING FEATURES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED).

3

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_le

g_02.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

LEGEND SHEET - POINTS

LEG-02

022940_cph_leg_02.dgn

10

SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K

DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS:

AS-BUILT REVISIONS ALL DIMENSIONS IN ft UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:

SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.

TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR

IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR,

4

12.006.00 12.00 6.00 6.006.00

1 ON

21 ON 2

TRAVEL LANE

12.00

TRAVEL LANE

12.00

TRAVEL LANE HOV LANE SHOULDER

15.00

SHOULDER HOV LANE TRAVEL LANE

12.00 12.00

TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE

ACCEL. LANE DECEL. LANE SHLDRSHLDR

CL CL

13.00 13.0015.0013.0013.00

BRIDGE DECK JOINT

CARLL’S STRAIGHT PATH ROAD

I-495 WESTBOUND I-495 EASTBOUND

L.

LE

KH

T


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

TYP-01

10

UNDER CARLL’S STRAIGHT PATH ROAD

I-495 (LONG ISLAND EXPESSWAY)

TYPICAL SECTION

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

EXISTING GROUND

PROPOSED GROUND

022940_cph_ty

p_01.d

gn

022940_cph_typ_01.dgn

TYPICAL SECTION

SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




5


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

TYP-02

10

TYPICAL SECTION


NOT TO SCALE

TYPICAL SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

CARLL’S STRAIGHT PATH ROAD APPROACH

SIDEWALK

1:2 SLOPE

1:2 SLOPE

THRU WITH LEFT TURN LANE NORTHBOUND TRAVEL LANESOUTHBOUND TRAVEL LANESHOULDER SHOULDER

2.0’5.0’VARIES2.5’ 5.0’ 11.0’ 5.0’11.0’11.0’

SOUTHBOUND TRAVEL LANE THRU WITH LEFT TURN LANE NORTHBOUND TRAVEL LANE SHOULDER SIDEWALK

1.5’5.0’

SHOULDER

6"vCURB

6"vCURB

BARRIER

CONC.

2% 2%6%

52.0’

TOTAL PROPOSED BRIDGE WIDTH

2%6%

6%2%

2% 2%6%

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E

022940_cph_ty

p_02.d

gn


TYPICAL SECTION

OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SITE CONSTRAINTS.

1. LANE, SNOW STORAGE AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS MAY CHANGE BASE ON DEVELOPMENT

NOTE:

STORAGE

SNOW

5.0’5.0’ 5.0’11.0’11.0’11.0’

SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




6

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_ty

p_03.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

TYP-03


10

PR

C

RC

PER

GB

RG

B

LA

WA

LF

NC

LA

WA

PR

C

LA

WA

RG

B

RC

PE

PE RC R

GB

LA

WA

LF

NC

TYPICAL SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

STA. CSP 4+40.83

EXISTING SOUTH APPROACH


TYPICAL SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

STA. CSP 4+80.91

EXISTING SOUTH APPROACH


THROUGHOUT APPROACH.

1. SEE DWG. GNP-02 FOR CROSS SECTION PLAN VIEW, LANE WIDTH VARIES

NOTES:

c

c

EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION

SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




7

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_ty

p_04.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

TYP-04


10


LA

WA

RG

B

RC

PE

PR

C

PE RC R

GW

LA

WA

LA

WA R

GB

RC

PE

PR

C

PE RC R

GW

LA

WA

TYPICAL SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

STA. CSP 7+50.33

EXISTING NORTH APPROACH


TYPICAL SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

STA. CSP 7+94.32

EXISTING NORTH APPROACH


c

c



NOTES:

SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




8

022940_cph_ty

p_05.d

gn


A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940


TYP-05

10

BF

BD

CB

DE

BD

RC

BDJ

BD

CB

DE

BF

TYPICAL SECTION

NOT TO SCALE



NOTES:

STA. CSP 6+18.08

EXISTING BRIDGE


c

TOTAL WIDTH OF EXISTING BRIDGE

39’-10"

SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




9

0 10 20 30 40’10

1" = 20’

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_gn

p_01.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

GENERAL PLAN SHEET

GNP-01

022940_cph_gnp_01.dgn

10

MA

TC

H

TO

DW

G.

NO.

GN

P-02

ST

A.

CS

P 3

+85.0

0

SUFFOLK

GRID

NO

RT

H


STA. CSP 2+00.55

BEGIN RAISING VERICAL PROFILE

SOUT

H SE

RVIC

E

ROAD

STA. CSP 1+70.55

BEGIN PAVEMENT WORK

BEGIN PROJECT LIMIT

CSP 1+00 CSP 2+00 CSP 3+00

CS

P 1

+00.0

0

PO

B

CS

P 1

+00.0

0

PI

CSP 1+00 CSP 2+00 CSP 3+00

CS

P 1

+00.0

0

PO

B

CS

P 1

+00.0

0

PI

GRID

NO

RT

H


STA. CSP 2+00.55

BEGIN RAISING VERICAL PROFILE

SOUT

H SE

RVIC

E

ROAD

STA. CSP 1+70.55

BEGIN PAVEMENT WORK

BEGIN PROJECT LIMIT

TC

TC

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




MA

TC

H

TO

DW

G.

NO.

GN

P-01

ST

A.

3+85.0

0

MA

TC

H

TO

DW

G.

NO.

GN

P-03

ST

A.

6+80.0

0

0 10 20 30 40’10

1" = 20’

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_gn

p_02.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

GENERAL PLAN SHEET

GNP-02


10

10SUFFOLK

GRID

NO

RT

H


PROPOSED 6’ SHOULDER

EASTB

OUND

I-495 (LO

NG IS

LAND E

XPRESS

WAY)

WESTB

OUND

I-495 (LO

NG IS

LAND E

XPRESS

WAY)

STRAIGHT PATH ROAD (SEE TYP-01)

I-495 EASTBOUND UNDER CARLL’S

PROPOSED 12’ DECELERATION LANE

(SEE DWG. TYP-03)

TYPICAL SECTION STA. CSP 4+40.83

SOUTHERN APPROACH EXISTING

(SEE DWG. TYP-03)


SOUTHERN APPROACH EXISTING(SEE DWG. TYP-05)

BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION STA. CSP 6+18.08

CARLL’S STRAIGHT PATH ROAD EXISTING

CSP 4+00 CSP 5+00 CSP 6+00CSP 4+00 CSP 5+00 CSP 6+00

GRID

NO

RT

H



EASTB

OUND

I-495 (LO

NG IS

LAND E

XPRESS

WAY)

WESTB

OUND

I-495 (LO

NG IS

LAND E

XPRESS

WAY)


I-495 EASTBOUND UNDER CARLL’S

PROPOSED 12’ DECELERATION LANE

(SEE DWG. TYP-03)


SOUTHERN APPROACH EXISTING

(SEE DWG. TYP-03)


SOUTHERN APPROACH EXISTING(SEE DWG. TYP-05)

BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION STA. CSP 6+18.08

CARLL’S STRAIGHT PATH ROAD EXISTING

SCREENING

SCREENING

OH

OH

OH

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_gn

p_03.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

GENERAL PLAN SHEET

GNP-03


10

0 10 20 30 40’10

1" = 20’

MA

TC

H

TO

DW

G.

NO.

GN

P-02

ST

A.

CS

P 6

+80.0

0

11SUFFOLK

GRID

NO

RT

H


STA. CSP 9+05.93

TIE BACK INTO EXISTING

END VERTICAL PROFILE WORK


NORT

H SE

RVIC

E

ROAD


I-495 WESTBOUND UNDER CARLL’S

PROPOSED 12’ ACCELERATION LANE

(SEE DWG. TYP-04)


NORTHERN APPROACH EXISTING

(SEE DWG. TYP-04)



STA. CSP 9+35.93

END PAVEMENT WORK

END OF PROJECT LIMIT

CSP 7+00 CSP 8+00 CSP 9+00CSP 7+00 CSP 8+00 CSP 9+00

GRID

NO

RT

H


STA. CSP 9+05.93

TIE BACK INTO EXISTING

END VERTICAL PROFILE WORK


NORT

H SE

RVIC

E

ROAD


I-495 WESTBOUND UNDER CARLL’S

PROPOSED 12’ ACCELERATION LANE

(SEE DWG. TYP-04)



(SEE DWG. TYP-04)



STA. CSP 9+35.93

END PAVEMENT WORK

END OF PROJECT LIMIT

UB

UB

VALVE

TC

TC

OH

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K



CARLL’S STRAIGHT PATH ROAD OVER I-495

ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




135

140

145

150

155

160160

135

140

145

150

155

160160

CSP 1+00 CSP 1+50 CSP 2+00 CSP 3+00 CSP 4+00

EL

EV

ATIO

N

STATION

PVI

CS

P 2

+00.5

5

EL

EV 144.2

4

PV

C

CS

P 2

+90.8

5

EL

EV 148.9

7

5.25%

L = 600.00 FT.

G1 = 5.25%

G2 = -4.72%

E= -7.48 FT.

SSD = 360.45 FT.

A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_pro

_01.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

PRO-01

022940_cph_pro_01.dgn

10


PROFILE

PROPOSED GROUND

EXISTING GROUND

0 10 20 30 40’

HORIZONTAL SCALE

01

2’

VE

RTIC

AL

SC

AL

E

12SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K




ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




135

140

145

150

155

160160

135

140

145

150

155

160160

CSP 4+00 CSP 5+00 CSP 6+00 CSP 6+75

EL

EV

ATIO

N

STATION

PVI

CS

P 5

+90.8

5

EL

EV 164.7

1

HIG

H

CS

P 6

+06.6

2

EL

EV 157.2

5


A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_pro

_02.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

PROFILE

PRO-02


10

0 10 20 30 40’

HORIZONTAL SCALE

01

2’

VE

RTIC

AL

SC

AL

E

I-495 (LONG ISLAND EXPRESSWAY)

EXISTING GROUND

PROPOSED GROUND

BIN 1049350

11.5" 9.5"

I-495

EA

ST

BO

UN

D

CE

NT

ER

LIN

E

I-495

WE

ST

BO

UN

D

CE

NT

ER

LIN

E

L = 600.000 FT.

G2 = -0.047

E= -7.475 FT.

SSD = 360.449 FT.

G1 = 0.052

PR

OP

OS

ED

ED

GE

OF

SH

OU

LD

ER

ST

A.

CS

P 5

+32.2

PR

OP

OS

ED

ED

GE

OF

DE

CE

L

LA

NE

ST

A.

CS

P 5

+38.2

13SUFFOLK

28-

AU

G-2013 15:3

6

areynolds

CONTRACT NUMBER

DRAWING NO.

SHEET NO.


BRIDGES CULVERTSPIN

JO

B

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

N

SU

PE

RVIS

OR

DOCUMENT NAME:

COUNTY:

PR

OJ

EC

T

MA

NA

GE

RD

ESIG

ND

RA

FTIN

GC

HE

CK

CH

EC

K




ON:

AFFIX SEAL:

FIL

E

NA

ME

=

US

ER

=

DA

TE/

TI

ME

=

ON:

ALTERED BY:




135

140

145

150

155

160160

135

140

145

150

155

160160

CSP 6+75 CSP 7+00 CSP 8+00 CSP 9+00 CSP 9+50

EL

EV

ATIO

N

STATION

PV

T

CS

P 0

+890.8

5

EL

EV 150.5

4

PVI

CS

P 9

+05.9

3

EL

EV 149.8

3

-0.05 L - 15.09 FT.

L = 600.000 FT.

G1 = 0.052

G2 = -0.047

E= -7.475 FT.

SSD = 360.449 FT.


A.

RE

YN

OL

DS,

P.E.

022940_cph_pro

_03.d

gn


TOWN OF HUNTINGTON

022940

PROFILE

PRO-03


10

0 10 20 30 40’

HORIZONTAL SCALE

01

2’

VE

RTIC

AL

SC

AL

E

EXISTING GROUND

PROPOSED GROUND

I-495 (LONG ISLAND EXPRESSWAY)

BIN 1049350

PR

OP

OS

ED

ED

GE

OF

AC

CE

L

LA

NE

ST

A.

CS

P 6

+98.5

PR

OP

OS

ED

ED

GE

OF

SH

OU

LD

ER

ST

A.

CS

P 7

+04.5

14SUFFOLK


APPENDIX B Environmental Information

August 2013 PIN 0229.40

BIN 1049350 – Carlls Straight Path over LIE, Bridge Replacement

Social, Economic and Environmental Resources Checklist

PIN: 0ABP.09 TYPE FUNDING: Federal/State DESCRIPTION: BIN 1049350 – Carlls Straight Path over L.I. Expressway (I-495)

DATE: July 3, 2012 REVISION DATE:

TOWN: Huntington NEPA CLASS: 2 COUNTY: Suffolk SEQRA TYPE: 2

SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

PRESENCE OR ANALYSIS NEEDED? IMPACT OR ISSUE?

YES NO YES NO

Social Land Use

Neighborhoods and Community Cohesion

General Social Groups

School Districts, Recreation Areas and Places of Worship

Economic Regional and Local Economies

Business Districts

Specific Business Impacts

Environmental Wetlands

Surface Waterbodies and Watercourses

Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers

Navigable Waters

Floodplains

Coastal Resources

Aquifers, Wells, and Reservoirs

Stormwater Management

General Ecology and Wildlife Resources

Critical Environmental Areas

Historic and Cultural Resources

Parks and Recreational Resources

Visual Resources

Farmlands

Air Quality Analysis

Energy Analysis

Noise Analysis

Asbestos

Contaminated and Hazardous Materials

Construction Effects

Indirect (Secondary) Effects

Cumulative Effects

August 2013 PIN 0229.40


ANTICIPATED PERMITS

No Permits are anticipated.

Documentation for “Yes” Answers Identified Above Asbestos: The Regional Environmental Group reviewed current photos, the BIN folder and available as-built plans for this bridge. This information revealed that there appears to be some minor amounts of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) to be disturbed by the proposed project. However, the potential presence of ACM will not significantly affect the environment as the Department utilizes standard items and NYS Department of Labor-approved procedures for its’ safe removal. NYSDOT will perform a full asbestos survey, and if necessary collect samples to determine whether any additional asbestos–containing materials are present. After the Department reviews and approves the survey report, the D/B consultant will, as necessary, recommend the appropriate items and notes to be included in the construction phase.

August 2013 PIN 0229.40


NEPA ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

Answer the following questions by checking YES or NO. I. THRESHOLD QUESTION YES NO 1. Does the project involve unusual circumstances as described in 23 CFR §771.117(b)? ____ __X__ M If YES, the project does not qualify as a Categorical Exclusion and an EA or EIS is required. You may STOP COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST. M If NO, go on. II. AUTOMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION YES NO 2. Is the project an action listed as an Automatic Categorical Exclusion in 23 CFR §771.117(c) (C List) and/or is the project an element-specific project classified by FHWA as a Categorical Exclusion on July 22, 1996? ____ __X__ M If YES to question 2, the project qualifies for a C List Categorical Exclusion. You may STOP COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST. The checklist should be included in the appendix of the Final Design Report (or Scope Summary Memorandum/Final Design Report). The CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION memo is to be sent to the appropriate Main Office Design liaison unit with a copy of the Final Design Report (or Scope Summary Memorandum/Final Design Report). A copy of the CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION memo must also be sent to the Office of Budget and Finance, Project and Letting Management, and others (see sample DETERMINATION memo attached). M If NO to question 2, go on. III. PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION YES NO 3. Is the project on new location or does it involve a change in the functional classification or added mainline capacity (add through-traffic lanes)? ____ __X__

August 2013 PIN 0229.40 YES NO 4. Is this a Type I project under 23 CFR 772, "Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction"? ____ __X__ 5. If the project is located within the limits of a designated sole source aquifer area or the associated stream flow source area, is the drainage pattern altered? ____ __X__ 6. Does the project involve changes in travel patterns? ____ __X__ 7. Does the project involve the acquisition of more than minor amounts of temporary or permanent right-of-way (a minor amount of right-of-way is defined as not more than 10 percent of a parcel for parcels under 4 ha (10 acres) in size, 0.4 ha (1 acre) of a parcel 4 ha to 40.5 ha (10 to 100 acres) in size and 1 percent of a parcel for parcels greater than 40.5 ha (100 acres) in size? ____ __X__ 8. Does the project require a Section 4(f) evaluation and determination in accordance with the FHWA guidance? ____ __X__ 9. Does the project involve commercial or residential displacement? ____ __X__ 10. If Section 106 applies, does FHWA’s determination indicate an opinion of adverse effect? ____ __X__ 11. Does the project involve any work in wetlands requiring a Nationwide Wetland Permit #23? ____ __X__ 12. Does the project involve any work in wetlands requiring an individual Executive Order 11990 Wetland Finding? ____ __X__

August 2013 PIN 0229.40 YES NO 13. Has it been determined that the project will significantly encroach upon a flood plain based on preliminary hydraulic analysis and consideration of EO 11988 criteria as appropriate? ____ __X__ 14. Does the project involve construction in, across or adjacent to a river designated as a component proposed for or included in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? ____ __X__ 15. Does the project involve any change in access control? ____ __X__ 16. Does the project involve any known hazardous materials sites or previous land uses with potential for hazardous material remains within the right-of-way? ____ __X__ 17. Does the project occur in an area where there are Federally listed endangered or threatened species or critical habitat? ____ __X__ 18. Is the project, pursuant to EPM Chapter 1A and Table 2 and Table 3 of 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93, non-exempt or does it exceed any ambient air quality standard? ____ __X__ 19. Does the project lack consistency with the New York State Coastal Zone Management Plan and policies of the Department of State, Office of Coastal Zone Management? ____ __X__ 20. Does the project impact or acquire any Prime or Unique Farmland as defined in 7 CFR Part 657 of the Federal Farmland Protection Policy Act and are there outstanding compliance activities necessary? (Note: Interpret compliance activity to mean completion of Form AD 1006.) ____ __X__

August 2013 PIN 0229.40 M If NO for questions, 3-20, go on to answer question 21. M If YES to any question 3-20, project will not qualify as a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion. Answer questions 21 and 22 for documentation only and go on to question 23. 21. Does the project involve the use of a YES NO temporary road, detour or ramp closure? __ _X_ M If NO to questions 3-20 and NO to question 21, the project qualifies as a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion. You may STOP COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST. M If YES to question 21, preparer should complete question 22 (i-v). If questions 3-20 are NO and 21 is YES, the project will still qualify as a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion if questions 22 (i-v) are YES. 22. Since the project involves the use of temporary YES NO road, detour or ramp closure, will all of the following conditions be met: i. Provisions will be made for pedestrian access, where warranted, and access by local traffic and so posted. _ _ ____ ii. Through-traffic dependent business will not be adversely affected. _ _ ____ iii. The detour or ramp closure, to the extent possible, will not interfere with any local special event or festival. _ _ ____ iv. The temporary road, detour or ramp closure does not substantially change the environmental consequences of the action. _ _ ____ v. There is no substantial controversy associated with the temporary road, detour or ramp closure. _ _ ____

August 2013 PIN 0229.40 M If questions 3-20 are NO, 21 is YES and 22 (i-v) are YES, the project qualifies for a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion. You may STOP COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST. M If questions 3-20 are NO, 21 is YES and any part of 22 is NO, go on to question 23. 23. Is the project section listed in 23 CFR YES NO §771.117(d) (D List) or is the project an action similar to those listed in 23 CFR §771.117(d)? ____ ____ For those questions which precluded a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion, documentation should be provided for any YES response to questions 3-20 or for a NO response to any part of questions 22 (i-v). This documentation, as well as the checklist, should be included in the Design Approval Document, i.e., Final Design Report, etc., to be submitted to the Main Office/FHWA Design liaison unit for submission to the FHWA Division for classification of the project as a D List Categorical Exclusion.


APPENDIX C Traffic Information and Pedestrian

Generator Checklist

Stra ht llow

Carlls Straight Path at I495Latest 3 Years (Jan 1, 2010 ‐ Dec 31, 2012)

DMV Case #Case Year

DateMilitTim

ary e

Nuofmbe Veh

r AccideClass

nt ManColl

ner of ision

NSR SSRCStrP

arlls aight ath

IA

ntersewith

t ction NSR

Intw

At ersection ith SSR

Road Character

WeatherLight

ConditionsRoad Surface

Contributing Factors

Comments

33636948 2010 1/23/2010 0:35 2 PDO Overtake X Curve and Level

ClearDark Road Lighted

DryUnsafe Lane Change

33857131 2010 6/19/2010 5:09 1 PDO Fixed Object X Straight and Level

Clear Dawn Dry Fell Asleep Fence

33880112 2010 6/25/2010 10:50 2 PDO Right Angle X Unknown Clear Daylight DryDriver

Inattention

33900063 2010 7/12/2010 20:53 1 PDO Fixed Object X Curve and Level

Clear Daylight DryAlcohol

involvementMailbox, Tree

34079302 2010 11/16/2010 8:35 1 INJ Fixed Object X Straight and Level

Cloudy Daylight WetPavement Slippery

Tree

34122029 2010 12/1/2010 8:20 2 PDO Rear End X Straight and Level

Rain Daylight WetDriver

Inattention

33891499 2011 4/18/2011 18:00 2 INJ Right Angle X Straight and Level

Cloudy Daylight DryTraffic Control Disregarded

33919859 2011 4/16/2011 15:48 2 INJ Right Angle X Straight and Grade

Rain Daylight WetTraffic Control Disregarded

34083451 2011 9/26/2011 16:15 3 INJ Other X Unknown Unknown UnknownUnknow

nUnknown

34274128 2011 5/9/2011 8:20 2 INJ Rear End X Straight Following tooig and Grade

Clear Daylight DryFo ing too

close

34405701 2011 12/20/2011 14:48 2 PDO Right Angle X Straight and Level

Cloudy Daylight DryTraffic Control Disregarded

X and ey

uny

X and ly

ose y

34403284 2011 12/19/2011 9:50 1 PDO Fixed Object X Straight and Grade

Clear Daylight Dry

Reaction to other

uninvolved vehicle

Utility Pole

34405906 2011 12/27/2011 22:45 2 PDO Right Angle X Straight and Level

CloudyDark Road Lighted

WetDriver

Inattention

34521226 2012 3/25/2012 9:35 2 PDO Rear End X Straight and Level

Cloudy Daylight WetDriver

Inattention

34517430 2012 3/15/2012 14:15 2 INJ Right Angle XStraight and

HillcrestCloudy Daylight Dry

Failure to Yield ROW

34593915 2012 6/7/2012 9:00 1 PDO Fixed Objectj X Straight and Grade

Clear Daylight Dry

Reaction to other

uninvolvedUtility Pole

Grady g

involved vehicle

34475713 2012 7/13/2012 20:37 1 INJ Fixed Object X Straight and Grade


DryAlcohol

involvementUtility Pole

34543322 2012 9/24/2012 1:52 1 INJ Fixed Object X Curve and Level


DryUnsafe Speed

Driver Inattention

Guide Rail

34692112 2012 7/26/2012 19:00 2 PDORight Turn Against X Straight

and LevelClear Daylight Dry

Traffic Control Disregarded


Clear Daylight Dry Unsafe Speed Utility Pole

34718173 2012 8/25// /2012 16:15 2 INJ Rear End X Straight and Level

Clear Daylight DryFollowing too

closely Levey g

cl l


Clear Daylight DryDriver

InattentionParked Car


Clear Daylight DryDriver

InexperienceFence

NYSDOT Highway Design Manual, Pg.18-6 Exhibit 18-1

Pedestrian Generator Checklist P.I.N.: 0229.40/ BIN 1049350 Project Location: Carlls Straight Path over LIE Project Description: Bridge Replacement Note: The term “generator” in this document refers to both pedestrian generators (where pedestrians originate) and destinations (where pedestrians travel to). A check of “yes” indicates a potential need to accommodate pedestrians and coordination with the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator is necessary during project scoping. Answers to the following questions should be checked with the local municipality to ensure accuracy. 1. Is there an existing or planned sidewalk, trail, or pedestrian-crossing facility? 2. Are there bus stops, transit stations or depots/terminals located in or within 800 m of the project area? 3. Is there more than occasional pedestrian activity? Evidence of pedestrian activity may include a worn path. 4. Are there existing or approved plans for generators of pedestrian activity in or within 800m of the project that promote or have the potential to promote pedestrian traffic in the project area, such as schools, parks, playgrounds, places of employment, places of worship, post offices, municipal buildings, restaurants, shopping centers, or other commercial areas, or shared-use paths? 5. Are there existing or approved plans for seasonal generators of pedestrian activity in or within 800 m of the project that promote or have the potential to promote pedestrian traffic in the project area, such as ski resorts, state parks, camps, amusement parks? 6. Is the project located in a residential area within 800 m of existing or planned pedestrian generators such as those listed in 4 above? 7. From record plans, were pedestrian facilities removed during a previous highway reconstruction project? 8. Did a study of secondary impacts indicate that the project promotes or is likely to promote commercial and/or residential development within the intended life cycle of the project? 9. Does the community’s comprehensive plan call for development of pedestrian facilities in the area? 10. Based on the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, would the project benefit from engineering measures under the Safe-Routes-To-School program? Eligible infrastructure-related improvements must be within a 3.2 km radius of the project. The Candlewood Middle School is located within a 3.2 radius of the project limits Note: This checklist should be revisited due to a project delay or if site conditions or local planning changes during the project development process.

NOYES

Comments: We agree that reconstructing the sidewalk on the east side of the bridge to meet current standards will give greater utility and the best accessible route to pedestrians, further supported by the connection to the existing sidewalk along the east side of Carlls Straight Path running north and south of the bridge . Additionally, the connecting curb ramps on each side of the bridge at the Carlls Straight Path and LIE Service Road intersections should be upgraded to meet current standards. Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator: L. Wexler Project Designer: T. Quadri/DB team Checklist Prepared by: P. Elgut Reviewed by: S. Fathi Date: 07/11/2013 0 drive/landscape arch.& environment/forms&letters/pedestrian generator checklist


APPENDIX D Public Information Plan

Public Involvement

Scope

The goal of the public involvement activities is inform the public and agency participants, and providing timely information throughout the design and construction process.

Standards

The Design-Builder shall perform the Public Involvement Plan support activities in accordance with the following Standard unless otherwise stipulated in the Project Requirement herein:

a) NYSDOT Project Development Manual: Appendix 2, Public Involvement Manual

Requirements

Public Outreach This contract is a product of the Departments goal to eliminate bridge structural deficiencies and improve the vertical clearance through the New York Works Program. The public outreach component is intended to foster a close working relationship with residents, land owners, community groups, local officials, educational institutions, businesses, etc.

Because the scope of this project is complex, the Design-Builder will have a subordinate role in public outreach to the Regional Public Involvement Coordinator (RPIC) and the Regional Public Information Officer (PIO) and will coordinate public information through the NYSDOT Construction QA Engineer. This will primarily have to do with notifying key stakeholders (road users, general public, area residences, educational institutions, emergency services, businesses, etc.) with road closure information, project milestones or construction related activities in proximity to adjacent homeowners.

This project has been identified as a New York Works Project through the Office of the Governor and is subject to various public information requirements. Coordination and advance notice, with the Regional Public Information Officer, is expected prior to opening the bridge to traffic.

Media Relations

Media Inquiries: All media inquiries, requests for interviews from local print or broadcast news media, trade magazines or other must be referred to the Regional Public Information Officer in the Regional Director's Office. The NYSDOT Construction QA Engineer, under direction of PIO, or the PIO will handle all requests.

Travel Advisories: Since most of the public information will be relative to work zone public information, reasonable advance notice of start of work, any lane closures, full road closures, etc. is expected to be given to the Regional Public Information Officer/Regional Director’s office via the NYSDOT Construction QA Engineer to allow for timely dissemination.

The Design-Builder shall support communications strategies by the Department that seek to inform affected road users, the general public, area residences and businesses, and appropriate public entities about the roadway closures, commuter alternatives, and any potential impacts on traffic.

The goal of these efforts is to keep the public informed, in advance whenever possible and in real-time, regarding Project actions that would affect road users, the general public, area residences and businesses, especially regarding roadway closures and possible travel alternatives. These activities, which would be consistent with the requirements of Project Requirements 17 – Work Zone Traffic Control and Access, will include Construction Bulletins on published by the Department, based on information provided by the Design-Builder, especially focused on traffic changes, higher-noise construction periods or locations, or other construction activities of potential concern to the public. The Design Builder will be responsible for the daily interaction with the affected homeowners and businesses with regards to but not limited to; security of their properties, utility services, night time operation, access to their properties, etc.

Written Materials Written materials will be created by DOT and disseminated electronically via e-mail distribution lists, the project web site and printed copies. Support by the Design-Builder to reproduce materials will be required. This will include providing background information for project specific on daily operations. This may include letters and/or flyer providing scheduled operations to the homeowners and businesses that may be impacted by the construction.

Public Information Meeting A public information meeting may be considered, with the Regional Directors approval in mid 2014 to offer an opportunity for the public at large to learn more about this and other ongoing highway projects in this area. Support by the Design-Builder to provide construction-related information will be required. Technical information about Design-Build process, schedule, or construction methods being used that may interest attendees, etc. may be incorporated. Coordination with the Regional Public Involvement Coordinator (RPIC) and NYSDOT Construction QA Engineer will be needed. A representative of the Design-Builder will be required to attend the meeting.

PROJECT SCOPING REPORT/ FINAL DESIGN REPORT

Documents