Top Banner
Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?
17

Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Vicente Rodd
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of SerbiaEuropean Integration Office

WRAP UP SESSION

Have we learned something?

Page 2: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

Hierarchy of Strategic Documents

IPA II Regulation / Rules of Application

Enlargement Package (EU Enlargement Strategy, SAA, European Partnership, EC Progress Report)

Country /Multi-Country Strategy Paper

National Sector Programme or (IPA-specific) Sector Planning Document -SPD)

Action Documents (ADs)

(Draft) Action Programme (AP)

Financing Proposal

Commission Implementing Decision

Financing Agreement

Annexed: SPDs

Annexed: ADs

Annexed: AP

Page 3: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

There might also be cases where an individual Action Programme is made up of one single Action, particularly where an Action (and therefore the entire Action Programme) focuses on a defined sector (e.g. through Budget Support).

Page 4: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

Programme Types

Page 5: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

A Country Action Programme

Page 6: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

Page 7: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

The Sector Planning Document

Page 8: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

Sector Planning Document1. Sector Description1.1 National Sector Policy & Strategy1.2 Sector Institutional Framework, Coordination, Capacity1.3 Performance Assessment Framework

2. Sector Programme Rationale2.1 Sector Status & Problem Analysis2.3 SWOT Analysis

2.4 Cross-Cutting Issues SDP Core Element 1: Intervention Logic2.5 Links with other sectors

3. Sector Programme Description3.1 Overall & Specific Objectives SDP Core Element 2: Sequencing

(Actions)3.2 Impact Indicators3.3 Results3.4 Measures & Operations3.5 Past and on-going experience, lessons learned3.6 Sustainability3.7 Assumptions & Pre-conditions3.8 Institutional Arrangements for Implementation

4. Budget4.1 Summary of Indicative Budget4.2 Budget breakdown per year

Page 9: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

SPD: Intervention Logic

NAD /CSP SPD AD

Overall Objective /Enlargement

Strategy

Priority /Target

Measure

Results

Results

Overall Objective

Specific Objective

Overall Objective

Specific Objective

Page 10: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

How do we make SPD?

Screening NAD measures

Overview of existing and future projects

Evaluations

EC Progress Report 2013

CSP targets

Sector absorption capacity

Solutions

Problems

Page 11: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

POTENTIAL OPERATIONS 2014-2016 and INDICATIVE TIMETABLEThemes for discussion 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 20201. Support to acquis in environment and climate change sector

Preconditions: To be in line with NPAA, forthcoming benchmarks and sequenced with bilateral aquis support;

2. Project preparation in waste management

Preconditions: The line ministry leading role in development of GAP reports within the Methodology of selection and prioritization of projects;Policy decision: Finalization of the revisions of the Waste Management Strategy;

3. Project preparation in water management systems (water suply, wastewater, flood protection)

Preconditions: The line ministry leading role in development of GAP reports within the Methodology of selection and prioritization of projects;Policy decision: Systematic decision on improvement of management water related projects in order to avoid usual bottlenecks; Legal establishment of responsibilities between the Contracting Authority, ministry in charge and local authorities;Development of the Water Strategy.

4. Investment in waste management systems

Preconditions: The number of waste management related projects at the bottleneck list significantly reduced;Policy decision: Systematic decision on improvement of management water related projects in order to avoid usual bottlenecks; Legal establishment of responsibilities between the Contracting Authority, ministry in charge and local authorities;

Page 12: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

POTENTIAL OPERATIONS 2014-2016 and INDICATIVE TIMETABLEThemes for discussion 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 20201. Border management (implementation of IBM strategy) (Assessment of the needs for improvement of the organisation and management of borders, Harmonize the existing administrative procedures for joint operation of border services, TNA and training plan for the border services, Needs assessment and recommendations for synchronized development of the telecommunications and information technologies, Construction of border crossings)

Precondition: Project documentation and necessary permits relevant for construction/reconstruction of border crossings; Clear prioritization according to the CAS Business Plan2. Migration management (Asylum - improvement of accommodation; Support to improvement of migration management system in the Republic of Serbia and its compliance with the EU standards and recommendations; Capacity building for all competent institutions on national and local level responsible for providing education, health protection, employment, social welfare and administrative (such as issuance of documentation) services; Support to statistical data gathering and sharing, monitoring of the migration flows and recommendations for improved and existing regulations to be aligned with the EUROSTAT methodology; Support to IDPs - voluntary sustainable return and improvement of living conditions)

Precondition: Acceptance of the local community to construct asylum centre; Project documentation and necessary permits relevant for construction/reconstruction of asylum centre in place3. Fight against organized crime(Analyze the legal and institutional capacities for development of the NCIS, TNA and multidisciplinary training programme for improving capacities for financial investigation, Need assessment and recommendations for establishing uniformed databases in order to develop ILP-Intelligence-led Policing, Create legal and institutional framework for development of the ILP-Intelligence-led Policing, Develop and establish the ILP, Fight against terrorisms, cyber-crime, drugs and money laundering)

Page 13: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

AF Intervention logicOVERALL OBJECTIVEThe Action contribution to sector policy objectives (impact)

OVIHow the overall objective is to be measured (SMART)

SoVHoe the information will be collected, when and by whom

ASSUMPTIONS

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVECentral objective in terms of sustainable benefits to be delivered to the Action beneficiaries

OVIHow the specific objective is to be measured (SMART)More details in section 4

SoVHoe the information will be collected, when and by whom

If specific objective is achieved, what assumptions must hold true to achieve the overall objective

RESULTSTangible products or services

OVIHow the results are to be measured (SMART)

SoVHoe the information will be collected, when and by whom

If results are achieved, what assumptions must hold true to achieve the specific objective

ACTIVITIESTasks to be undertaken, can be grouped in components

MEANSService contractGrant Twinning

OVERALL COSTTotal cost for the entire Action(not to be broken down)

If activities are completed, what assumptions must hold true to deliver the results

Page 14: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

Operating Structure  IPA Monitoring Committee

Sector Monitoring Committee

Sector Working Group

SECTOR OPERATING STRUCTURE

Sector Lead Institution

Body Responsible for Measure 1

Body Responsible for Measure 2

Body Responsible for Measure N

Contracting Authority

End Beneficiaries

Contractors /Service Providers

NIPAC/ NIPAC-TS

EC-HQ /EUD

National Authorising Officer /National Fund

Audit Authority

Page 15: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

SPD – sector support budgetSOURCES OF FUNDING

TOTAL EXPENDITURE

TOTAL PUBLIC EXPENDITURE

IPA CONTRIBUTION

NATIONAL PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION PRIVATE CONTRIBUTION

IB INV (a)=(b)+(e) (b)=(c)+(d) EUR(c)

%(2)

Total EUR

(d)=(x)+(y)+(z)

%(2)

Central EUR(x)

Regional/local EUR

(y)

IFIsEUR(z)

EUR (e)

%(3)

Action/measure 1

Activity/Operation 1.1

…..

Action 2

Activity 2.1

Activity 2.2

…..

TOTAL IB

TOTAL INV

TOTAL SECTOR SUPPORT

(2) Expressed in % of the public expenditure (b)(3) Expressed in % of the total expenditure (a)

Page 16: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office

AF - budget

Budget Timeline*

Implementation modalities Total EU contribution

Launch of procedure

Contract signature

PROCUREMENT

Number of tenders to be launched and their types (service, FWC, supplies, works) and expected number of contracts deriving from tenders

GRANTS

Call for proposals, direct grants and indicate a rough number of expected contracts

TWINNING

…..

OTHER

Timeline in Q (Q1, Q2)Contract signature date for direct grants

Page 17: Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office WRAP UP SESSION Have we learned something?

Project funded byThe European Union

Government of the Republic of Serbia

European Integration Office