Project Cost : Rs. 210.00 Lakhs Prepared by PIA & BDO, AIBAWK

1

AREA : 1400 Ha

Project Cost : Rs. 210.00 Lakhs

Prepared by PIA & BDO, AIBAWK

Aizawl District, Aizawl

2

INDEX

1. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------- 3

2. Project Profile ------------------------------------------------------------- 8

3. History of Project Villages --------------------------------------------------- 11

4. Basic Information -------------------------------------------------------------- 13

5. Participatory Rural Appraisal ----------------------------------------------- 35

6. Problem Typology --------------------------------------------------- 36

7. Project Intervention Plan --------------------------------------------------- 39

8. DPR Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------ 60

9. Consolidation and Withdrawal Phase ---------------------------------- 61

10. Institutional & Capacity building Plan ------------------------------ 62

11. Basic Profile of the project location --------------------------------------- 64

12. Maps of the project ------------------------------------------------------------ 65

13. Institutional mechanism ------------------------------------------------------ 69

14. Memorandum of Understanding ------------------------------------------- 70

15 SWOT Analysis of PIA ------------------------------------------------------- 78

16. PIA & Watershed Committee details ------------------------------------- 79

17. Convergence Plans ----------------------------------------------------------- 80

18. Expected Outcomes ---------------------------------------------------------- 81

19. Expected Estimate Outcomes --------------------------------------------- 83

20. Monitoring & Evaluation ----------------------------------------------------- 84

21. List of Institution identified for capacity building ----------------------- 86

22. Farm & Societies Registration format ------------------------------------ 87

3

1. INTRODUCTION:

Land is a critically important national resource in which all human activity is based. Its

efficient management is vital for economic growth and development of Rural Areas to harness

the full potential of the available land resources and prevent its further degradation,

development of rainfed area, degraded area is of great significance. Its management is complex

and multi dimensional and its development requires scientific, holistic and innovative approach.

Unprecedented population and cattle pressure and demands of Society on scarce land, water

and biological resources and the ever increasing degradation of these resources is affecting the

stability and resilience of our ecosystem and the environment as a whole. The expansion of

human settlement and infrastructure, intensification of Agriculture, expansion of agriculture into

marginal areas and fragile ecosystem emphasizes the need for integrated planning and

management of resources.

With ever increasing population, the needs of the people is also ever increasing. The

population of Mizoram has now reached 10 lakhs resulting in increasing demand for

commodities and lack of work for both the urban and rural population. Most of the rural

population depends on shifting cultivation for their livelihood. Shifting Cultivation is practiced by

clearing forest areas. The previous year’s jhumland is kept fallow for 5-6 year’s depending on

the area available for cultivation for each village.

Shifting Cultivation results in burning of large areas of forest including those that are not

required for cultivation thereby destroying forest cover, there are fewer trees and shrubs to

decrease the flow of water, hence only the top soil becomes wet leading to increased runoff

speed of rain water resulting in low underground water table. Those natural springs we have

that we so proudly say never runs dry have now become dry during the winter months. The

water we have left barely meets the requirement for human consumption not to mention those

required for irrigation of farmland.

The thinning forest cover decreases moisture content of the soil making it unsuitable for

plantation of trees and crops. Temperature also increases considerably because of this. Our

once fertile lands will soon become deserts if we do not put a stop to shifting cultivation soon.

Each watershed area under the project is a micro level effort to achieve the objective of

watershed programme through treating under productive and hitherto unproductive lands and

taking up allied activities for the benefits of the rural poor and landless. This project adopt a

common strategy of multi-resource management involving all stakeholders within the

watershed, who together as a group, co-operatively identify the resources, issues and concerns

of the watershed as well as develop and implement a watershed plan with solutions that are

environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.

4

The objective of the project will be:-

1. Developing water, land/degraded land and abandoned jhum land on watershed basis,

keeping in view the capacity of land, local condition and needs.

2. Promoting overall economic development and improving Socio-economic condition of

the poor and disadvantaged section inhabiting the project area.

3. Restoring ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and developing natural

resources. i.e. land, water and vegetative cover.

4. Encouraging village community for sustainable community action for operation and

maintenance of assets created and further development of potential of natural resources

in the watershed.

5. Employment generation, poverty alleviation, community empowerment and development

of human and other economic resources of the village.

Watershed Management works will be taken up in multi-tier approaches as below:-

1. First Tier-Canopy/Ridge Area Treatment

(a) Stoppage of Shifting Cultivation: Under IWMP farmers are encouraged to

practice permanent farming in compact areas. All the areas which were

previously used for cultivation will be left fallow and in due course of time natural

forest growth will be regenerated.

(b) Afforestation: Besides the natural forest areas, more areas are proposed for

afforestation under IWMP and other Schemes. Increased forest area will result in

decrease of runoff water, soil water content and increased precipitation/rainfall,

increased underground water table.

(c) Prevention of soil erosion: Due to the hilly nature of Mizoram and

deforestation, rain water easily erodes the fertile top soil. Fertility decreases

considerably in places of minimal forest cover. To prevent more soil erosion,

construction of terraces, afforestation and other means are proposed so that

there will be minimum soil content in the runoff water.

2. Second Tier-Horticulture Crop Area Treatment

(a) Construction of water harvesting structures and better utilization of water

resources: Rainfall is still moderate and whatever rainfall we get, if we have

proper harvesting structures, is more than enough for every household use

without any other source of water. In place of permanent cultivation where

natural streams are available for water harvesting using gravity and in those

places where water is not available by gravity also, water harvesting should be

encouraged. The harvested water can be used both for human consumption as

well as for irrigating farmlands and will provide the required water during dry

season.

5

(b) Land Development: The areas covered under IWMP project are planned to be

developed in such a way that the productivity will increase. The areas proposed

for afforestation will be developed by making terrace. Construction of terrace will

prevent unnecessary water runoff, thereby, recharging the water table. In places

where permanent cultivation will be practiced, depending on the slope of the

terrain, terrace, bench terrace and contour trench will be constructed. Cultivation

of commercial crops will be practiced in such places and irrigation facilities for dry

season will be provided.

(c) Gestation period treatment: The Permanent Horticulture crops planted in the

2nd Tier-Area will be mostly Orange, Hatcora, Nimbu, Litchi, Mango, Avocado and

other cash crops. These crops will be harvested only after 5 years or more.

During the gestation period, farmers and cultivators will be encouraged and

assisted to introduce annual cash crops to meet their daily weeks.

3. Third Tier-Agriculture Crop Area Treatment:

(a) Wet Rice Cultivation & Mixed Farming: In places of permanent cultivation,

the land will be prepared in such a way that 2 – 3 crops can be planted in a year.

This cannot be achieved with only the natural fertility of the land; therefore,

provision will be made so that the cultivators can raise domestic animals in their

farmland. The manure collected from animals can be used to fertilize the land

making the crops produced in these farms entirely organic. Organic products are

easier to export and have a larger market.

(b) Multiple cropping: If water and manure are available in plenty, farmers can

plant different varieties of crop depending on the season. Even during the dry

season, cultivation can be done and also permanent crops can be raised.

4. Rural – Urban migration: Due to lack of employment opportunities and for various

other reasons, rural populations migrate to urban areas. In urban areas there is

deficit of work due to large influx of population from rural areas, resulting in poverty

and creating problem for resettlement to rural areas. Using IWMP this rural-urban

migration is hoped to be kept in check by providing them with means for secure

income.

5. Women empowerment: For an accelerated Socio-economic development of any

community active participation of women is essential. In a social set up like ours, i.e.,

Patriarchal family system, the participation of women in the development process

has to be ensured through tangible measures at various levels which result in

empowerment of women in the real sense. This project will address to decrease the

workload of women in the project area. Time spent for collecting drinking water will

be reduced which will result in positive impact on the quality of life and health of

women and the family.

6

6. Provision of livelihood for Asset-less families: The Asset-less families will

be provided with a scope of micro-entrepreneurship, they will be assisted and trained

to take up those activities identified under the project. Livestock farming, handicraft,

mechanics, black smithy, Tin smithy, Petty trade etc. will be encouraged by the PIA

for this Asset-less people. Necessary financial and technical support will be provided

from the project fund.

7. Creation of Assets: Using IWMP Project, plans are made to provide durable

assets to the rural population. These assets will last long after the completion of this

project and will be handed over to the public on completion of this project. The

management, repair, renovation or augmentation of these assets will be the

responsibility of the people. Plans are made in such a way that once the project is

completed the public will be able to restore or augment these assets without

Government help. A minimal charge will be collected from the user of these assets;

this collection along with WDF will be used for maintenance of these assets.

8. Convergence with other Programmes: An opportunity for convergence with

other programmes of Government of India and State Government will be opened for

the Project area as well as beneficiaries and end-users. Convergence with other

programme will be those which are not convenient to address from IWMP fund and

those needing more fund and man days which could not be met from the said

scheme. Beneficiaries will be encouraged to utilize such fund received by them from

other sources for enhancing their activity in the project area. However, parallel

funding of same activity in the same project area will be accounted separately to

avoid duplicity of utilization of fund. Care should be taken to check misappropriation

of fund. All scheme funds should be utilized in a holistic and judicious manner.

9. Connectivity of the Project Area: Even though, IWMP is silent on the

provision of connectivity to the project area, construction of road, bridges and

culverts will be given priority to ease transportation of products from the project area.

Connectivity will enhance works done per day per person since time for traveling to

the project area from habitation will be less. Connectivity will also ensure better

monitoring and supervision and implementation of works. Provision of connectivity

should be done under the existing MG-NREGA or other State Schemes. An Annual

Action Plan formulated by Gram Sabha of each project village will give priority on this

convergence approach.

7

PROJECT PROFILE

Aizawl : Aibawk IWMP - I Name of Watershed : Tuikuallui

Area of the project : 1400 Ha.

Cost of the project : Rs.210.00 lakhs

(a) Central Share : Rs.189.00 lakhs (b) State Share : Rs.21.00 lakhs

Villages to be covered

(a) Falkawn : 700 Ha

(b) Kelsih : 700 Ha

1. Drainage System: Tlawng River is one of the most important rivers of Mizoram and is

the longest river in Mizoram. It passes through five district of the State forming district

boundary lines while running along its course. It is navigable by small boat throughout

the year and hence it provides water transport route with neighboring Assam State.

Important tributaries of Tlawng River from Aizawl District are Lau lui, Changte lui, Serlui

A, Tuikual lui, Kurung lui and Durlui before it enters to Kolasib District. Aizawl –

Tlangnuam-I project covers Serlui ‘A’ micro-watershed areas.

2. Geomorphology: Aizawl - Aibawk – I Project are mainly formed by low structural Hill

include those hills which rise below 850 m from mean-sea-level.

3. Lithology: Rock types of sandstones which are fine to very fine grained, not too

bluish, grey to light brown in colour, compact and hard, thinly bedded, rarely yellowish

brown, medium grained and friable are formed in Falkawn of the project. Shale and Silt

stone, which are dark grey to grey in colour and are usually splintery, are formed in

Kelsih village area of the project.

4. Ground water Potential : In the low-lying areas including parts of flood plain and

valley fills the ground potential of water is good. Falkawn of the project area falls under

this category of good ground water potential. The project area of Kelsih, where the

recharge condition of water table and the water –yielding capacity of the ground is

neither suitable nor poor. Hence, ground water potential is moderate and needs to be

focused upon.

8

5. Land use / Land cover : The land use and cover pattern in the project area can be

classified as below:-

a) Agriculture Land : These lands are primarily used for farming and for

production of pulses and cereals and horticulture crops.

b) Plantation: This class includes areas, which are being utilized for plantation of

cash crops, the prominent ones includes Coffee, Tea, Red Oil Palm, Tung,

Arecanut.

c) Forest Area: This project area have forest that have a crown cover neither too

thick nor too thin and forest once disturbed and affected by biotic factors like

shifting cultivation and wildfire.

d) Bamboo Forest: The low lying areas near rivers and streams are covered

by bamboo forest and are also found in hill slopes.

e) Shifting Cultivation, Current and abandoned: The traditional practice of

growing crops on forest / vegetated hill slopes by clearing and burn method.

These areas are left idle for some years, after its regeneration it was again used

for jhuming. These lands are prone to deterioration due to erosion. They

generally occupy topographically high location with sparse vegetation with thin

soil cover.

6. The soils of the Project Area : Since the Project Areas lies below 800 m from MSL

and above 72 MSL. Loamy skeletal soil and Fine loamy soil are found which are mostly

formed by Typic Udorthents, Typic Dystrochrepts, Typic Hapludults, Umbric

Dystrochrepts and Humic Hapludults. In the low lying area where Serlui ‘A’ joins Tlawng

river, the soils are mostly Aquic Dystrochrepts, Fluventic Dystrochrepts and Fluvenic

Umbric Dystrochrepts. Most of the activity under the project will be at Hill Slope with 10%

- 45% slope; here the soils are mostly Humic Hapludults, Umbric Dystrochrepts, Typic

Hapludults and clayey Typic Dystrochrepts.

7. Land Holding: The Village Council, which is the authorized body to allot sites to

the villager, can issue House Passes within the limit of the Village Area. However, the

Village Council also issue passes and allot land even though they are not authorized to

do so beyond the village limit which were called ‘V.C. Passes’. If the allot tee properly

utilize the land so allotted, his ownership was always accepted by the Government. In

this ways V.C’s leased out a big portion of lands lying between the village area and the

jhum land. Also in some cases, there are periodic patta passes issued by Revenue

Department. However, in remote areas, V.C was the sole authority to issue passes.

9

8. Rainfall : Although pre-monsoon rains break in from the early part of March

with occasional thunder-storms, the monsoon period really starts from the middle week

of April and the peak period is in the month of July to August. It declines gradually and

ceases during November. Occasional showers of low to medium intensity also occur

during the period from December to February due to the influence of the retreating

monsoon.

The rainfall recorded during 2000 -2009 as per the record of Padma Shree Pu

C.Rokhuma, Aizawl, Mizoram.

2000 ------------------ 97.70 inches 2001 ------------------ 84.90 inches

2002 ----------------- 95.40 inches 2003 ------------------ 123.65 inches

2004 ------------------ 89.85 inches 2005 ------------------- 56.90 inches

2006 ------------------- 64.75 inches 2007 ------------------- 96.45 inches

2008 ------------------ 62.05 inches 2009 ------------------- 55.75 inches

The minimum & maximum temperatures between 1986 – 2008 recorded during January was 70C min - 260C max, during April was 130C min – 350C max, During July was 180C min - 340C max.

9. Ethnology : The Project Area is inhabited by Mizo tribe comprising of Ralte,

Hmar, Paihte, Sailo and other Lusei Tribes. Mizo dialect is the common language.

10

HISTORY OF THE VILLAGES

FALKAWN:

Falkawn is young village and was established in 1974 due to the hard work & foresight

of Pu R.Lalawia (L), Pu.Lalzamlova Sailo (L) & other prominent persons from Muallungthu &

Kelsih villages with the guidance and help of the Government. The Government was eager and

responsive to the proposal made by the above mentioned people to set up a village in the area

between Muallungthu and Kelsih village as it has an ideal terrain. The government accepted the

proposal and thus was born Falkawn Plan later on to be known as Falkawn village. The

boundary of the village was demarcated by taking small areas from Muallungthu and Kelsih

village areas. The government build identical houses which were occupied by 10 families each

from the neighboring village. The light that was turned on by the people then has continued till

now even after 32 years.

The name of the village comes from “Sakei Fal” which basically means ‘Tiger Trap’

which was set up in the area now occupied by Referral Hospital. After 32 years Falkawn village

now has 300 households. As it has ideal terrain, important government projects such as

Referral Hospital and Art & Culture Department projects are set up in this village and its name

has spread far and wide in Mizoram.

As already mentioned, Falkawn is still a young village but it is lucky in the sense that

there have never occured any earth shattering calamities even though it has faced minor forest

fires and storms destroying several houses. With regard to religion, the village has had revival

from time to time. At such times community feast are usually the form of celebration regardless

of denomination.

As the village was set up by demarcating areas of the neighboring village, there is not

much land for cultivation; therefore, there is not much worth mentioning in terms of agricultural

productivity as compared to other villages. Even under these circumstances the villagers still

produce enough to feed their families and few who are lucky enough gather huge harvest.

Maybe because of its youth, Falkawn village has so far not been visited by National

Leader, State Chief Minister; Minster & Governor, Government Official have often visited the

village. This could be due to its potential for growth and productivity.

11

The Village has educational institutions from Primary School to Higher Secondary

School. Initially the village was under Muallungthu village council area. During this time Primary

School – II was set up. A private H/S was also started during this period. Later on this was

provincialised to Government High School and was taken over simultaneously by Falkawn

village council. The Government use to set up Comprehensive School but now the village has

separate Primary, Middle & High Schools.

The Village started recieving power supply around 1982. Initially the poles were wooden

poles constructed with the Government’s help, all the poles have now been converted to iron

poles. Regarding roads, the exact time of construction is difficult to pin point as the main road to

Lunglei and southern districts of Mizoram use to pass through this area. For a long time this

road was abandoned but now it has become busy once again due to construction and

renovation of the state highway by World Bank.

Falkawn village has no specific identity as such because most of the villagers come from

different parts of the state. The traditional Mizo values and principles are still upheld. The major

festivals of Christmas & New Year are celebrated with community feast organized by the

Churches of different denominations as practiced everywhere in the state.

Games & Sport Development is a big part of the village community. Even after the main

playground was given to the State Government as the site for Referral Hospital, the village still

managed to make a good name for itself in the state level and area level competitions and

district wise high school sports. Therefore, the great sacrifice of the sportsmen of Falkawn

village should not be in vain and the government should help in any way it can for sports

promotion and development of playground & courts.

Falkawn village does not have much to claim in terms of producing prominent persons in

the State. Pu Rotluanga MCS currently Project Director DRDA, Aizawl District is one of the most

prominent person hailing from the village. He is the son of one of the forefathers of the village

Pu R.Lalawia (L). A number of MA/BA degree holders have hailed from this village up till now.

The village is proud of these educated people and has been honoured accordingly.

The aforementioned details are the main story of the village so far. Now that several

households have been chosen under IWDP to practice permanent cultivation, the villagers are

eager to see the success of this project and look forward to reap the rewards which this project

will give them. The villagers are earnest for the forthcoming project under IWMP occupational

and prepared to work hard to achieve sustainable and stable income & become a model village

for all the other villages of the state.

12

KELSIH: Kelsih village was set up in 1872. Previously the village was situated in

the west of the present village where these was a wide spread hill. From this area, the village

was shifted to its present place. The name of the village is derived from a stream/water hole

(Sih) near the road which was salty and gathers many goats (Kel). The chief of Kelsih village

was Lalsailova and he was the only educated chief in the nearby area. Melriat village and

Hualngohmun village used to be a part of Kelsih village.

The boundary of the village is from Falkawn Community Hall following a small stream

sharing boundary with Muallungthu village in the south. In the west the village shares boundary

with Hualngohmun village, toward the east the village area is upto Tuirial River and toward the

west the boundary is along Tuikang Stream, Tlawng River till Samtlang and Lungleng village

boundary.

In 1963, 15 houses were destroyed by fire started due to burning of jhum land. In 1979

and 1965, seven houses and ten houses respectively were completely burned down. In 1966,

during insurgency, the village was targeted by the Indian Army with a 25 pounder 80 times,

numerous domestic animals were killed in the process and one human casualty occured.

The village underwent a major religious revival in 1935, with the sounds of prayers being

heard continuously. Farming is a common occupation of the villagers. Before 1970, 2/3 families

were known to have harvest of more than 8000 kg / 80 gtl. of rice. In 2005, students from

Boston University, USA stayed in the village for a week conducting research. Primary School

was established in 1905, Middle School in 1962. Power supply reached the village in 1972.

Road construction was started in 1950. The first vehicle to entire the village was a Jeep in 1952.

The village practice traditional Mizo values and principle without any extravagant style

even in case of dowry. Christmas and New Year are celebrated as practiced throughout

Mizoram. Sport is a favourite pastime among village youth. The village has secured

championship in Hockey in the Zonal Competition in 1954. And are 5 times zonal champion in

Football. The prominent persons hailing from the village are Captain Lalrina B.A. (1945) and

Prof. Dr. Lianzela.

13

BASIC INFORMATION

VILLAGE WISE– DETAILS OF IWMP WATERSHED

FALKAWN

S. No

Name of the Project

Mapping of village

Micro Watershed Micro

watershed area (Ac)

Proposed cost (Rs.)

1 Aizawl-Aibawk –I Done Tuikuallui I&II 1750 105,00,000

EXISTING ASSETS (WORKS ALREADY COMPLETED UNDER DIFFERENT SCHEMES)

Name of the IWMP watershed : Aizawl-Aibawk -I Village : Falkawn Name of the Micro watershed : Tuikuallui I&II Mandal : Aibawk Watershed code No : 3c2a8d1a, 3c2a8d2a District : Aizawl

Sl N Name of work Survey

No./ local Name

Quantity (No. / RMTs)

Amount spent

(in Rs.)

Programme year of

Construction

Status (Functional/ to be repaired / rejuvenated)

1 School building Falkawn 4 2100000 1982-1994

Functional

2 Community Hall Falkawn 1 1250000 2002 Door &

Windows need repair

3 Anganwadi Falkawn 2 400000 2004 Functional

4 Market shed Falkawn 1 120000 2005 Functional

5 Internal roads Falkawn 3000 155000 2008-2010

Surfacing required

6 Health Sub-Centre Falkawn 1 450000 2007 Functional

7 Typical Mizo Village Falkawn 1 1100000 2005 Functional

14

Demographic Features

1 2 3 4 5

Sl.No Feature Male Female Total

1 Population

SC

ST 643 647 1290

BC

Others

2 Children (0-14 years) 105 151 256

3 Sex Ratio 643 647 1290

4 Literacy

Literates 629 632 1261

Illiterates 14 15 29

5 Work Force

Agriculture 348 329 677

Industrial

Service 4 1 5

6 Birth Rate 5 9 14

7 Death Rate 1.5 0.5 2

15

Livestock Details

1 2 3

Sl.No Feature No./quantity

Milch Animals

Cows Nil

Buffaloes Nil 1

Goat, sheet Nil

Draught Animals Nil

Ox 2 2

He Buffalo Nil

Others

Poultry 100 3

Piggery 150

4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) Nil

Fodder Availability

Dry (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce 5

Green (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce

6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce

16

OPERATIONAL HOLDING & SOCIO- ECONOMIC STATUS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sl No Type Total HHs

No. of Land Holding (Ha)

BPL HHs

Rain fed Irrigated

Annual Gross Income (Rs.)

SC ST Others SC ST Others SC ST Others TOTAL

1 Marginal (wet-1.25 ac, dry-2.5 acres) 325 56 625 2465000 2465000

2

Small Farmers (wet-2.5 ac, dry-5.0 acres)

21

100

3 Big farmers

4 Landless

TOTAL 346 725 2465000 2465000

MIGRATION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

No. of persons migrating Sl No

M F TOTAL

No. of days per year of

migration

Major reason (s) for migration

Distance of destination of migration from the

village (km)

Occupation during migration

Income from such occupation (Rs.)

1 8 2 10 30 Wage employment in

Urban Area 15

Construction works, helper, House maid

2500/ month

17

DETAILS OF CBOs ALREADY EXISTING

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Total no.of CBOs No. of members No. of ST in

each category No. of SC in

each category No. of Others in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Bank linkage S. No

Type of Group

With only Men

With only

Women

With both

TOTAL M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total No. of Amount

(Rs.)

i) Landless 4 2 6 4 2 6

ii) MF 52 104 156 18 22 40

iii) SF SHG 8 8

iv) LF

1

TOTAL 8 8 56 106 162 22 24 46

i) Landless

ii) MF

iii) SF UGs

iv) LF

2

TOTAL

3 VSS

4 RMGs

5 WUA

6 VO 1 2 3 396

417 813 22 24 46

Other related Groups

(Specify)

18

INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

1 2 3 4

S. No Infrastructure type No./Quantity Status (description)

Education Institution

Anganwadi 3 V.C

Primary School 1 Government

Secondary School 2 Government

Govt. Collage Nil

1

Vocational Institutions Nil

Services Institutions

Bank

Post office 1 Government

Primary Health Care Center 1 Government

2

Markets / Shandles 2 P.R.I

3 No. of bore wells / pump sets 1 pump set Functional

4 No. of Milk collection centers (Union/Society/Pvt. Agency/Others)

Nil -

Total Quantity of surplus milk Nil -

5 Road Connectivity (to main road by an all-weather road) (Yes/No)

Yes Surfaced road

6 Bus facility (yes /No)

Yes Regular

7 No. of HHs provided electricity 346 Regular

8 Others (specify ------------)

9 No. of HHs with access to drinking water 346 Stream, Fountain, Rain water

10 Access to Agro Industries (Yes / No ) No

11 Any other facilities (specify ------------- )

19

LAND USE PATTERN (IN ACRES)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Sl No

Village

Geographical

Area

Forest Area

Community

Land

Land

under Non Agriculture

Use

Permanent Pastures

Land under

miscellaneous tree crops and groves

Uncultivated Waste land

Cultivated area

Net

Sown Area

Net Area sown more than once

Gross

Cropped Area

Temporary fallow

Permanent fallow

Cultivated Rainfed

Cultivated Irrigated

1 Falkawn 2850 50 1750 155 160 50 75 92 213 305 - 305

* In the land used pattern, a portion of land which falls under two categories i.e. Permanent Pastures within Community Land or land under miscellaneous tree

crops and groves within community land is counted only once.

DETAILS OF CPR

1 2 3 4

Total Area (AC) Area owned / In possess of Area available for treatment (Ac) S.no CPR Particulars

Pvt. Persons Govt. (specify dept.) PRI Any other (Pl

Specify) Pvt.

Persons Govt. (specify

dept.) PRI

Any other (Pl Specify)

i) Waterland/ degraded land

255 1750 255 1750

ii) Pastures

iii) Orchards 124 124

iv) Villages Woodlot -

v) Forest 50 50

vi) Village Ponds / Tank 1 1 1 1

vii) Community Buildings 7 7

viii) Weekly Markets 1 1

ix) Temples/ Place of worship

8 8

x) Others (Pl. specify)

Total

380 50 1759 8 380 50 1759

8

20

AGRICULTURE IMPLEMENTS

1

2

3

S. No

Implements

Nos

1 Tractor Nil

2 Sprayers – manual / power Nil

3 Cultivators / Harrows Nil

4 Seed drill Nil

5 Small Hoe 514

6 Dao 388

7 Bended Dao 557

CROP CLASSIFICATION

1 2 3

S. No Crop classification

Area (Ac)

1

Single crop

Nil

2

Double crop

Nil

3

Multiple crop

72

21

CROPS & CROPPING PATTERN

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No Season Crop sown

Rain fed Irrigated Total

Area (Ac) Production

(Ton/yr) Productivity

(kgs/Ac)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./Ac)

Area (Ac)

Production (Ton/yr)

Productivity (kgs/Ac)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./Ac)

Area (Ac) Production

(Ton/yr)

Productivity

(kgs/Ac)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./Ac)

Maize 355 230 650 4000 355 230 650 4000

Ginger 250 212 850 6000 250 212 850 6000

1 Kharif

Cucumber 15 7 480 2500 15 7 480 2500

Rice 355 191 540 4000 355 191 540 4000

2 Rabi

TOTAL 975 640 2520 16500 975 640 2520 16500

SOIL CLASSIFICATION

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. N

Soil type Total

Extent (Ac)

Based on Depth (cms) – (mention area in Ac) Based on Slop (%) (mention area in Ac) Erosion (mention area in Ac)

Water Wind

V.Shallow (0.75)

Shallow (7.5-22.5)

Moderately deep (22.5 –

45.00)

Deep 945.0 – 90.0)

Very Deep (.90)

Nearly Level (0-2)

Moderate slope (2-6)

Strong slope (6-

15)

Steep (.15) Sheet Ril Gully

1 Siltstone

and Shale 7125 7125 125 2825 1925 2250 485 255

22

IRRIGATION FACILITIES

1 2 3 4

S. No Type of the Source Nos. Ayacut in Ac

1 M.I. tanks

2 Open wells

3 Bore wells

4 Canal irrigation

5 Natural spring head 14 35

STATUS OF WATER TABLE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl no

Name of the farmer

Sy. No Source

(open/bore/ well)

Date of recording

Depth of water table from

ground level (in mts)

Source located at (ridge/middle/valley

Remarks

1 Vanlalthanga P/ Patta Rain water 21.5.2010 Rain water

2 Rokunga P/ Patta Rain water 21.5.2010 Rain water

3 Lalpianga P/ Patta Rain water 21.5.2010

Ground area wet and moist

due to Monsoon rain

Rain water

QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl no

Source (Bore/ well / OHS etc)

Location Date of

collection of sample

No. of sample

s collecte

d

Specific remarks of

the lab report

Stage of ground water development (safe/semi

critical/critical/over exploited)

Reasons for over

exploitation

1 Thingthupui Tuikhur Thingthupui lui 24.5.2010 750 ml Portable Safe -

2 Phulraw Tuikhur Phulraw lui 24.5.2010 750 ml Portable Safe -

3 Bellei Tuikhur Bellei lui 24.5.2010 750 ml Portable Safe -

4 Ramri Tuikhur Ramri lui 24.5.2010 750 ml Portable Safe -

23

AVAILABILITY OF DRINKING WATER

1 2 3 4

S. No Item Units Quantity

1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs / day 51600

2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs / day 60640

3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 17

a) No. functional Nos 17

b) No. requires repairs Nos 2

c) No. defunct Nos -

4 Short fall if any Ltrs / day -

5 No. of families getting drinking water from out side the micro watershed area

Nos -

6 Requirement of new drinking water sources (if any) Nos. 4

SURFACE WATER SOURCES

1 2 3 4 5

S. No Type of water resource Nos Area irrigated

(Ac) Storage capacity

(Cu.m)

1 Tank

2 Pond

3 Lake

4 Check dam

5 Percolation tank

6 Channel

7 Any others (specify stream & Fountain) 17 N/A N/A

GROUND WATER STRUCTURES TO BE REPAIRED

1 2 3

No. available S. No

Type of Structure No. to be Repaired No. to be rejuvenated

No. with no interventions required

Total

1 Streams 5 12 17

2 Fountain 1 1 2

TOTAL 6 13 19

DETAILS OF EXISTING LIVELIHOODS FOR POOR

1 2 3 4

No. of beneficiaries S. No Name of activity

ST Others Total Women

Pre-project average income per HH (Rs.)

1 Shifting Cultivation 610

610 263 Rs.14,000/-

2 Carpentry 4 4 - Rs. 25000/

3 Tailoring 2 2 2 Rs. 22000/

4 Sugar cane Cultivation 36 36 14 Rs. 26000/

5 Gardening 5 5 2 Rs. 26000/

24

VILLAGE WISE– DETAILS OF IWMP WATERSHED

KELSIH

Sl. No Name of the

Project Mapping of

village Micro Watershed

Micro watershed area (Ac)

Proposed cost (Rs.)

1 IWMP Attached Tuikuallui I&II 1750 10500000

EXISTING ASSETS (WORKS ALREADY COMPLETED UNDER

DIFFERENT SCHEMES)

Name of the IWMP watershed : Aizawl-Aibawk –I Village : Kelsih Name of the Micro watershed : Tuikuallui - I & II Mandal : Aibawk Watershed code No : 3c2a8d1a, 3c2a8d2a District : Aizawl

Sl no

Name of work Survey No./ local Name

Quantity (No. /

RMTs)

Amount spent (in

Rs.)

Programme year of

Construction

Status (Functional/ to be repaired / rejuvenated)

1 School building Kelsih 5 2500000 1974-2002 Functional

2 Community Hall Kelsih 1 1250000 2004 Flooring needs

repairs

3 Anganwadi building

Kelsih 2 400000 2002-2003 Functional

4 Health Sub-Centre Kelsih 1 450000 2005 Functional

5 Waiting Shed Kelsih 1 75000 2006 Functional

25

Demographic Features

1 2 3 4 5

Sl.No Feature Male Female Total

1 Population

SC

ST 330 342 672

BC

Others

2 Children (0-14 years) 78 100 178

3 Sex Ratio 330 342 672

4 Literacy

Literates 280 242 522

Illiterates 50 100 150

5 Work Force 173 145 318

Agriculture 173 145 318

Industrial - - -

Service 4 - 4

6 Birth Rate 2 2.5 4.5

7 Death Rate 1.5 1.3 2.8

26

Livestock Details

1 2 3

Sl.No Feature No./quantity

Milch Animals

Cows Nil

Buffaloes

1

Goat, sheet 40

Draught Animals

Ox 2 2

He Buffalo

Others

Poultry 140 3

Piggery 200

4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) Nil

Fodder Availability

Dry (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce 5

Green (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce

6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce

27

OPERATIONAL HOLDING & SOCIO- ECONOMIC STATUS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sl No Type Total HHs

No. of Land Holding (Ha)

BPL HHs

Rain fed Irrigated

Annual Gross Income (Rs.)

SC ST Others SC ST Others SC ST Others TOTAL

1 Marginal (wet-1.25 ac, dry-2.5 acres) 200 65 200 1625850 1625850

2

Small Farmers (wet-2.5 ac, dry-5.0 acres) 10 65

10

347280 347280

3 Big farmers

4 Landless

TOTAL 210 65 210 1973130 1973130

MIGRATION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

No. of persons migrating

Sl No M F TOTAL

No. of days per year of migration

Major reason (s) for migration

Distance of destination of

migration from the village (km)

Occupation during migration

Income from such occupation (Rs.)

1 8 2 10 30 Wage employment

opportunity in Urban Area. 13

Domestic help, Helper & worker

2500/ month

28

DETAILS OF CBOs ALREADY EXISTING

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Total no.of CBOs No. of members No. of ST in

each category No. of SC in

each category No. of Others in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Bank linkage

S.No Type of Group

With only Men

With only Women

With only both

TOTAL

M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total No.of Amount

(Rs.)

i) Landless

ii) MF

iii) SF 58 63 131 18 31 49 SHG 7 7

iv) LF

1

TOTAL 7 7 58 63 131 18 31 49

i) Landless

ii) MF

iii) SF UGs

iv) LF

2

TOTAL

3 VSS

4 RMGs

5 WUA

6 VO 1 2 3 154

245

399

63 51 114

Other related Groups

(Specify)

29

INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

1 2 3 4

S. No Infrastructure type No./Quantity Status (description)

Education Instructions

Anganwadi 1 Government

Primary School 1 Government

Secondary School 1 Government

Govt. Collage

1

Vocational Institutions

Services Institutions

Bank

Post office 1 Branch Post Office

Primary Health Care Center

2

Markets / Shandles 1 Functional

3 No. of bore wells / pump sets 1 Functional

4 No. of Milk collection centers (Union/Society/Pvt. Agency/Others)

Nil

Total Quantity of surplus milk Nil

5 Road Connectivity (to main road by an all-weather road) (Yes/No)

Yes Surfaced road.

6 Bus facility (yes /No)

Maxi Cab Service Available

7 No. of HHs provided electricity 140

8 Others (specify ------------)

9 No. of HHs with access to drinking water Nil

10 Access to Agro Industries (Yes / No) -

11 Any other facilities (specify ------------- ) -

30

LAND USE PATTERN (IN HACTARE)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Sl No

Village Geographical Area

Forest Area

Community Land

Land under Non Agriculture

Use

Permanent Pastures

Land under miscellaneous tree crops and groves

Uncultivated Waste land Cultivated area

Net Sown Area

Net Area sown

more than once

Gross Cropped

Area

Temporary fallow

Permanent fallow

Cultivated Rain fed

Cultivated Irrigated

1 Kelsih 1750 75 1050 25 48 105 75 35 205 132 - 132

* In the land used pattern, a portion of land which falls under two categories i.e. Permanent Pastures within Community Land or land under miscellaneous tree crops and groves within community land is counted only once.

DETAILS OF CPR

1 2 3 4

Total Area (AC) Area owned / In possess of Area available for treatment (Ac) S.no CPR Particulars

Pvt. Persons Govt. (Forest dept.) PRI Any other (Pl

Specify) Pvt. Persons

Govt. (specify dept.)

PRI Any other (Pl

Specify)

i) Waterland/ degraded land 20 1050 20 1050

ii) Pastures 55 55

iii) Orchards 48 48

iv) Villages Woodlot -

v) Forest 75

vi) Village Ponds / Tank 4

vii) Community Buildings 5 4

viii) Weekly Markets 1 5

ix) Temples/ Place of worship 5 1

x) Others (Pl. specify) 5

Total 123 75 1065 123 1065

31

AGRICULTURE IMPLEMENTS

1 2 3

S. No Implements Nos

1 Tractor Nil 2 Sprayers – manual / power Nil

3 Cultivators / Harrows Nil

4 Seed drill Nil

5 Miniature Hoe 317

6 Dao 298

7 Bended Dao 344

CROP CLASSIFICATION

1 2 3

S. No Crop classification Area (Ac)

1 Single crop Nil

2 Double crop Nil

3 Multiple crop 120 (AC)

32

CROPS & CROPPING PATTERN

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No

Season Crop sown

Rain fed Irrigated Total

Area (Ac)

Production (Ton/yr)

Productivity (kgs/Ac)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./Ac)

Area (Ac)

Production (Ton/yr)

Productivity (kgs/Ac)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./Ac)

Area (Ac)

Production (Ton/yr)

Productivity (kgs/Ac)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./Ac)

Maize 134 99 700 2800 134 99 700 2800

1 Kharif

Paddy 385 123 600 3000 385 123 600 3000

2 Rabi

TOTAL 519 222 1300 5800 519 222 1300 5800

SOIL CLASSIFICATION

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No

Soil type Total

Extent (Ac)

Based on Depth (cms) – (mention area in Ac) Based on Slop (%) (mention area in Ac) Erosion (mention area in

Ac)

Water Wind

V.Shallow (0.75)

Shallow (7.5-22.5)

Moderately deep (22.5 – 45.00)

Deep 945.0 – 90.0)

Very Deep (.90)

Nearly Level (0-2)

Moderate slope (2-6)

Strong slope (6-15)

Steep (.15) Sheet Ril Gully

1 Siltstone

Shale 4375 4375 234 2165 675 300 314 219

33

IRRIGATION FACILITIES

1 2 3 4

S. No Type of the Source Nos. Ayacut in Ac

1 M.I. tanks - -

2 Open wells - -

3 Bore wells - -

4 Canal irrigation - -

5 Natural spring head 14 385

* If no. 5 is tapped, it could irrigate on approximate area of 385 Acres.

STATUS OF WATER TABLE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl no

Name of the farmer

Sy. No Source

(open/bore/ well)

Date of recording

Depth of water table from

ground level (in mts)

Source located at (ridge/middle/vall

ey Remarks

1 Lalchhuanthangi V/C Pass Rain Water 21.5.2010 Rain Water

2 Thianghlima V/C Pass Rain Water 21.5.2010 Rain Water

3 Vanlalruala

V/C Pass

Rain Water

21.5.2010

Ground was wet and moist due to early

onset of Monsoon

Rain Water

QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl no Source

(Bore/ well / OHS etc)

Location Date of

collection of sample

No. of samples collecte

d

Specific remarks of the lab

report

Stage of ground water development

(safe/semi critical/critical/over

exploited)

Reasons for over

exploitation

1 Chuma Tui Khawhnuai 21.5.2010 1 litres Portable Safe -

2 akawr Tui Fangfar lui 21.5.2010 750 ml Portable Safe -

3 Lengkir hla Sih lui 21.5.2010 750 ml Portable Safe -

AVAILABILITY OF DRINKING WATER

1 2 3 4

S. No

Item Units Quantity

1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs / day 26880

2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs / day 33420

3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 4

a) No. functional Nos 4

b) No. requires repairs Nos -

c) No. defunct Nos -

4 Short fall if any Ltrs / day -

5 No. of families getting drinking water from out side the micro watershed area

Nos 210

6 Requirement of new drinking water sources (if any) Nos. 5

34

SURFACE WATER SOURCES

1 2 3 4 5

S. No Type of water resource Nos Area irrigated (Ac) Storage capacity (Cu.m)

1 Tank

2 Pond

3 Lake

4 Check dam

5 Percolation tank

6 Channel

7 Streams & Fountain 14 N/A N/A

GROUND WATER STRUCTURES TO BE REPAIRED

1 2 3

No. available

S. No Type of Structure No. to be Repaired

No. to be rejuvenated

No. with no interventions

required Total

1 Streams 4 - 8 12

2 Fountains 1 - 2 3

TOTAL 5 10 15

DETAILS OF EXISTING LIVELIHOODS FOR POOR

1 2 3 4

No. of beneficiaries S. No

Name of activity

SC ST Others Total Women

Pre-project average income per HH (Rs.)

1

Shifting Cultivation

-

610

610

263

Rs.14,000/-

2 Carpentry 4 4 - Rs. 25000/

3 Tailoring 2 2 2 Rs. 22000/

4 Sugar cane Cultivation 36 36 14 Rs. 26000/

5 Gardening 5 5 2 Rs. 26000/

35

PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating

accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to

include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning,

implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the

stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and

watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires.

Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations

(apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the

farmers.

FINDINGS: The PRA exercise done in the project area revealed that the villages even after

lengthy lecture and deliberate discussion could not make the difference between what they want

and what they need. In each village the people thought that they need-

a) Community hall with Badminton Court.

b) Playground with a minimum size of 120m x 70m which is medium standard football

ground.

c) Internal roads and steps.

d) Market or waiting sheds.

e) Office building for various NGOs i.e., YMA, MHIP and MUP.

f) Construction of roads under MG-NREGA to connect their jhum land.

In view of the above points, none of the above items except Sl /No. (d) and (f) could not

alleviate poverty nor lighten the burden of loads they carry from their jhum land. Therefore, what

seem to be their needs are actually what they want to have.

Then, in the second exercise of the PRA, the need of the people was revealed, what they

want becomes negligible since their wants could not fulfill the needs of the rural populace.

Therefore, the following points came up which will be addressed with various R.D. Programme.

a) Water and moisture conservation for domestic and irrigation purposes.

b) Land development for horticulture, agriculture and pisciculture.

c) Afforestation and regeneration of village community land.

d) Construction of link road to each potential area to ease transportation.

e) Construction of storage facility and market infrastructure.

f) Training and capacity building for rural artisans and their sponsorship to various

institutions for up-gradation of skills.

36

PROBLEM TYPOLOGY

1 2 3 4 S. No

Problem area Problem analysis Proposed interventions to over come

problems

1

Soil Conservation

(slope, erosion, soil loss, rainfall, productivity ,

etc)

Soil lost is immense due to direct rain drop resulting in soil erosion, destruction of vegetative barrier, decreased rainfall. Top soil loss decreases fertility of the land resulting in less productivity.

Soil and moisture conservation will be done by way of construction of farm ponds, dug-out ponds, terracing, bench terracing, half moon terrace, contour trenching and planting trees, shifting cultivation will be controlled.

2

Water conservation

(water budget, Ground water

norms, productivity)

Decrease in vegetative barrier resulted in high run off speed of rain water and less chance of recharging water table. Direct sun light also decreases the moisture content of the soil. Once perennial streams become ephemeral.

In order to utilize every drop of water in a meaningful way, all the streams in the project area will be tapped to irrigate farm land. Rain water will be harvested in farm ponds, dug-out ponds and water harvesting structures to recharge the ground water content. Check dams will be constructed in various places to make ephemeral streams into perennial streams.

3

Crop coverage – { 80% of w/s area should be with canopy}

Practice of shifting cultivation destroyed crops and vegetative coverage; Sporadic wild fire also destroyed a vast portion of land every year. Abandoned jhum land increases resulting in less vegetative coverage

Permanent farming will be introduced in the project area by three tier system. Canopy areas will be treated to regenerate forest, in the second tier horticulture will be introduced; the third tier will be covered with WRC and Terrace for Agriculture activity.

4

Agriculture productivity (crop wise

compare with dist. Average)

Due to Loss of top soil, the productivity of land decreases tremendously, the productivity of land in case of paddy is only 600 Kg per acre, which is almost 50% less than 10-15 years ago. The crop wise district average for major crops is as below:-

S.No Project Area Dist Average

(a) Paddy–600 Kg/Ac 750 Kg/Ac

(b) Maize-800 Kg/Ac

950 Kg/Ac

(c) Banana–700 Kg/Ac

1000 Kg/Ac

The productivity will be enhanced by way of multiple cropping. Permanent crops will be introduced in slope areas, during the gestation period seasonal and annual crops will be sown which will doubled the income of the farmer. Organic manures will be used for enhancing the production as well as ensuring quality. Drip-irrigation will be provided to each farmer for irrigating crops. WRC areas will be provided with open or pipe irrigation to enhance productivity and enable farmer to sow more than once in their area.

5 Livestock

productivity

Lack of grazing ground for milch animals, draught animals and small ruminants. Lack of technical know how of animal management, remoteness of the project area and lack of financial support and infrastructure.

Developing the existing pasture land with proper management and technical inputs for livestock farming. Training at various identified institute to ensure growth and productivity. Developing infrastructures for production and marketing with logistic support.

37

6

Existing Livelihood

activities for Asset less persons

No employment opportunities in the project area to earn a living except in jhum lands where weeding is required. Lack of creativeness, training and financial support for such persons.

Organizing the people to form SHG’s and imparting training at various identified institutes, Door-step training at local area for Old-aged and handicapped persons. Developing infrastructures for production and marketing, provision of logistic support to the groups.

7

Community Based

Organisation & Social capital

base

The existing CBO’s i.e. YMA, MHIP and MUP are not aware of the importance of SHG’s and Federations and lack creativity and innovative mind.

Training for CBO’s/ VO’s in order to enable them to facilitate the newly formed SHG’s and federation for their growth and impart sense of ownership.

8

Capacity Building

(participation, awareness of

watershed community

There is no proper capacity building and awareness campaign.

Capacity building will be held at regular intervals. In order to ensure mass-participation, the time and venue should be notified in advance to all concerned.

9 Work Culture

of Labour force

Due to the implementation of various employment generation schemes, the people are used to earning their livelihood easily without much toil and sweat. They became irresponsible and forget the Mizo work culture where every family is self-sufficient.

In order to change the existing work-culture, comprehensive plan should be worked out to ensure better profits from works done by each individual. Ensure market for each produce and induce the spirit of ownership of every work done. Every one should be made to deliver considerable effort for his and his family’s self-sufficiency without external support.

10 Land

ownership Pattern

During the implementation of NLUP and MIP in Mizoram, community land available for jhuming was distributed to every family at the rate of 4 Acres. Even after the dis-continuance of the programmes, the allotee usually claimed their land allotted to them even if they could not look after it.

The Village Council in consultation with Revenue Department, Government of Mizoram should declared the allotment of land to those allotees null and void, and re-distribute the land to deserving families who are willing to take up the activities under IWMP.

11

Connectivity of Watershed Area and Potential

Areas

Due to lack of foresight, the village authorities could not formulate plans to connect every potential area with roads to ease transportation of produces resulting in heavy burden for farmers and cultivators.

Village Authorities will be made conscious of the importance of connectivity to the potential project areas. They will make fund available for construction of road connectivity under every available schemes. This will ease transportation of produces, reduce the cost of transportation and market price of the produce, it will also decrease time taken for the produces to reach markets.

12 Marketing of

produces

Even though the produces of the locality is of small quantity, it became too much for local consumption, but too little for outside market.

Produces will be quantified at least three-folded in each item to enable the farmers to sell outside the locality. Transportation arrangement will be made at watershed committee level to ensure that those produces reach the market within 24 hours.

38

13 Storage of produces.

Due to lack of storage facilities for storing Horticulture products in local area, the products became rotten in a short span of time, then farmers and cultivators not only losses but are also demoralized.

Cold storage facilities will be applied in the concerned Department under the Government of Mizoram where every beneficiary will deposit their produces before sending them to the market.

14 Credit Linkage

Due to lack of Banking infrastructure in remote villages, credit linkage and banking assistance are out of reach for the rural populace.

Bank officials will be made to participate more in the implementation of the project where they could fetch a good return. The dormancy of service area of each banks will be made to revive, in return, the loanees will be made to recover their loans in regular intervals so that the bank, the loanees and SHG will be more profitable.

15

Lack of Training

Infrastructure and

Institutional Support and Sponsorship

There are only a few training facilities and institutions for the rural artisans, even though the existing ones are almost out of reach for them due to lack of sponsorship and financial support for upgradation of skills.

Recent establishment of R-SETI at Zemabawk, KVK Lengpui and Farmers Training Centre at Selesih will help upgrade the rural artisans, farmers and micro entrepreneurs. Sponsorship will be done from training and capacity building fund of the project. Whenever possible, private trainers will be engaged to impart in – house/Door Step training to old aged pensioner, widows and handicapped persons. Up-gradation of skill will enable the produces of rural artisans to compete in the open markets.

16 Sparodic wild

fire

Due to Bamboo flowering in 2007, 2008 &2009, vast bamboo forest was covered with dried bamboos. Some miscreants used to set fire causing destruction of new young plants coming up.

Focus will be set to those areas selected under the project to control wild fire, controlled burning and watch of wild fire will be introduced. Comprehensive Plan will be evolved at Village Level to create awareness. Village Level Authority will be encouraged to punish and fine those who caused such wild fire.

39

PROJECT INTERVENTION PLAN

FALKAWN

PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL DETAILS

Sl.N Name of works % Physical in No.&

Ha Allocation in

rupees

1 Preparation of DPR 1 1 105000

2 Entry Point Activities 4 4 420000

3 Institution & Capacity Building 5 11 525000

Existing livelihood 6.5 62.3 682500 4

Productivity Enhancement Livestock group 6.5 62.3 682500

5 Livelihood for Asset less 10 95.8 1050000

6 Natural Resources Management 50 479.6 5250000

7 Monitoring & Evaluation 2 NA 210000

8 Consolidation Phase 5 NA 525000

9 Administration 10 4 1050000 100 TOTAL 10500000

40

PREPARATORY PHASE

AIZAWL DISTRICT : MIZORAM

NAME OF THE PROJECT : Aibawk – I

Name of Village

Amount earmarked for EPA

EPA Planned Estimated

Cost Expenditure

incurred Balance

Expected outcome

Actual Outcome

(i) Waiting Shed near Referral Hospital 120000 120000 42000 1 1 Falkawn 420000 (ii) MHIP Building 258000 258000 - 1 1

(i) Waiting Shed 120000 120000 42000 1 1 Kelsih 420000 (ii) MHIP Building 258000 258000 - 1 1

* As on 15th July, 2010

41

CROP PRODUCTION

Sl no

Farmer type

variety

Average land

holding (Ac)

Land type

(R/I/H/F/etc)

Major crops sown

Production (kgs/acre)

Major Gaps identified Possible interventions proposed under Adoptive

& infrastructure of PE

No. of units

required

Cost per unit

Proposed cost

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

High yield 2.5 R Paddy

700 83 10950 908850 1

SF

Less yield 2.5 R Paddy

600 382 10950 4182900

High yield - - - - 2

MF

Less yield 5 R Paddy

600 14.6 10950 158250

3 BF High yield - - -

1. Sparodic clearing of jhum land and burnt destroyed vegetative barrier resulting lost of top soil and fertility.

2. Burning of jhum land not only affected the jhum area, but also the wild fire destroyed the young vegetative plants in the adjoining areas.

3. Shifting cultivation resulted in destruction of natural vegetative barriers.

4. Destruction of vegetative barrier speed up the run off speed of rain water which decreases the chance of recharging water table.

5. Lost of top soil resulted less yield.

6. Lack of technical, financial and infra-development for practicing permanent jhuming for cultivators and farmers.

1. Introduction of Permanent jhuming in the project area for which land development activities like Bench Terracing, Terracing, WRC, Contour Trench and Half moon terrace and other moisture conservation works will be taken up.

2. Tapping all water sources for irrigating the project area.

3. Harvesting rain water during monsoon for utilization during dry season.

4. Introduction of quality planting materials of improved variety.

5. Planting of Horticulture cash crops like Orange,Nimbu,Hatkora,Banana, avocado, Pine-apple etc in those areas with slope % of 10-45

6. Leveling of nearly slope areas for WRC 7. Preparation of Canopy area for

regeneration of forest 8. Introduction of climbers like passion fruit

and grapes in those areas above 4000 feet from MSL.

- - -

i. Besides Paddy and Banana major crop shown in the area are Citrus fruit, Ginger, Sugar Cane, Papaya, Turmeric and Passion fruit

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR CROP PRODUCTION (WATERSHED MANANGEMENT WORKS)

PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs.

1 72 7,88,400 135 14,78,250 114.6 12,53,250 86 9,41,700 72 7,88,400 479.6 52,50,000

42

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK-UP OF WORKS FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT WORKS

(Physical and Financial)

Sl.N Name of Activity

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Surface Water Resources

No Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost

(a) Tanks 8 8 160 87600 8 8 160 87600 2 2 40 21900 2 2 40 21900 2 2 40 21900 22 22 440 240900

(b) Ponds 2 2 40 21900 2 2 40 21900 8 8 160 87600 8 8 160 87600 8 8 160 87600 28 28 560 306600

(c) Channel

1

(d) Gravity pipe line

10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 50 50 1000 547500

20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 100 100 1500 1095000

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL Recharging Ground Water

Resources No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost 2

Dug out Ponds 5 5 54750 5 5 54750 9.6 9.6 103500 5 5 54750 5 5 54750 29.6 29.6 322500

1

st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL Executing Agency Engineering Structure Treatment

No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost

Land Development in Private land. Contour bunding 2 21900 2 21900 2 21900 6 65700 Land Holder

Bench Terracing 8 87600 5 54750 5 54750 5 54750 5 54750 28 306600 Land Holder A

Earthen Checkdam 2 21900 2 21900 Land Holder

Land Development in Community land

Contour bunding 2 21900 1 10950 2 21900 2 21900 2 21900 9 98550 UG

Bench Terracing 2 21900 1 10950 1 10950 4 43800 UG

3

B

Earthen Checkdam 1 10950 1 10950 UG

43

Vegetative Cover 1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Executing Agency

Ridge Area Treatment in Community land

Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost

(i) Afforestation 5 1000 54750 10 2000 109500 10 2000 109500 3 600 32850 7 1400 76650 35 7000 383250 WC A

(ii) Regeneration 2 400 21900 10 2000 109500 10 2000 109500 4 800 43800 2 400 21900 28 5600 306600 WC

Land Development in Private Land

(I) Afforestation Land Holder

(ii) Horticulture 22 3960 240900 60 1080 657000 50 9000 547500 40 7200 438000 22 3960 240900 194 34920 2124300 Land Holder

B

(iii) WRC 10 NA 109500 10 NA 109500 Land Holder

Land Development in Community Lands

(i) Afforestation 2 400 21900 10 2000 109500 5 1000 54750 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 21 4200 229950 UG (ii) Regeneration 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 6 1200 65700 UG

(iii) Pasture 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 4 800 43800 UG

4

C

(iv) Nursery raising 2 30000 21900 2 30000 21900 UG

* The Norms of Aided Natural Regeneration (Ministry of Environment & Forest) have been followed under Afforestation and Regeneration i.e. 200 Plants/Ha

44

PROPOSED INTERVENTION FOR EXISTING LIVELIHOODS

Problem typology Sl No

Homogenous group

Type of activity

Average income

per month

Procurement

Production Service

Marketing Skills Proposed interventions

Units required

Unit cost

Total cost

1 Micro-

Enterprises Petty trade 1200 Sufficient Minimal Available 5 10950 54750

2 Handicraft 1300 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

3 Food Processing 1100 Sufficient Minimal Available 7 10950 76650

4 Mombati Making 1100 Sufficient Minimal Available 10 10950 109500

5 Handloom 1200 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

6 Broom Stick making

1000 Sufficient Minimal Available 10 10950 109500

7 Agarbati Stick making/Bamboo processing

1000 Sufficient Minimal Available 16.3 10950 178800

8 Knitting 1000 Sufficient Minimal Available 3 10950 32850

9 Tailoring 1500 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

10 Mechanic 2500 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

11

Artisans

&

Other

livelihoods

Carpentry 2500 Sufficient Minimal Available

Since, most of the targeted groups are without proper training and exposure outside their own village. Their skill i.e. Presentation for marketing their produces in the open market is difficult. Besides, the quality of their produces are always inferior to those available in the market, Quality of work should be upgraded in order to compete with others. Therefore, up gradation of skills of rural micro entrepreneur and artisans need to be focused.

Training for upgradation of skill will be provided for rural artisans by collaborating with KVK Lengpui, RSETI Zemabawk and other renown training institutes, for capacity building SIRD Kolasib and ETC Thingsulthliah will be engaged. Financial support will be provided from the project fund at the rate of Rs.10950 per unit or beneficiary. During the consolidation phase, those units which are identified to be weak should be provided the second dose of financial assistance.

3 10950 32850

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR EXISTING LIVELIHOOD (MICRO ENTERPRISE)

PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs.

1 10 109500 15.3 167850 14 153300 13 142350 10 109500 62.3 682500

45

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK-UP OF WORKS FOR EXISTING LIVELIHOODS

(Physical and Financial)

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No. Name of the Activity of

the SHG

No.of SHG to be

formed No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs.

1 Petty Trade 5 54750 5 54750

2 Handicraft 2 21900 2 21900

3 Food Processing 1 6 65700 1 10950 7 76650

4 Mombati making 1 10 109500 10 109500

5 Handloom 2 21900 2 21900

6 Broom Stick Cultivation 1 10 109500 10 109500

7 Agarbati Stick making/Bamboo processing

2 10.3 113100 6 65700 16.3 17850

8 Knitting 3 32850 3 32850

9 Tailoring 2 21900 2 21900

10 Motor Mechanic 2 21900 2 21900

11 Carpentry 3 32850 3 32850

TOTAL 5 10 109500 15.3 167850 14 153300 13 142350 10 10950 62.3 688500

46

LIVESTOCK GROUP

Problem typology (Describe) S. N

Type of Animal

No. of animals

with rearers

Animal Reproduction

Animal Health

Animal management

(feed etc)

Marketing / trading

Skills in management

Any other (specify)

Proposed interventions Units

required Unit cost

Proposed cost

1 Milch Animals

9 1/ 1.5 years Good Available Minimal 8 10950 87600

2 Draught animals

8 1/ 1.5 years Good Available Minimal 5 10950 54750

3 Small ruminants

2 1/ years Good Available Minimal 8 10950 87600

4 Pig rearing 65 8/ pig Good Available Minimal 19.3 10950 211650

5 Poultry 29 20/ Hen Good Available Minimal 18 10950 197100

6 Pisciculture - NA Good Available Minimal 3 10950 32850

7 Bee keeping - NA Good Available Minimal

The local rearers are

without technical

knowledge and skill;

however, by sharing their experience, they can do

their respective

activity smoothly.

Since, the livestock farming is

done in small scales; it can only meet the local demand

and consumption.

Hence, the incomes of rearers are very limited.

1. The local rearers will be encouraged to enhance their activity; the no. of animals will be doubled or tripled.

2. Infrastructure like Pig-sty, Poultry shed etc will be provided from the project fund.

3. Training will be conducted at various identified Institution to enhance their capacity.

4. Technical assistance will be made available in their door-steps.

5. The dropping of such animals will be processed for manures.

6. Marketing facilities will be provided.

1 10950 10950

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR LIVESTOCK GROUP (PRODUCTION SYSTEM) PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs.

1 13 147350 15.3 167850 14 153300 10 109500 10 109500 62.3 682500

47

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK UP OF WORKS FOR LIVESTOCK GROUP

(ALLIED AND OTHER ACTIVITIES) Physical and Financial

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year Total

Sl.No Name of Activity No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs.

Other Livestock.

(a) Cow/She Buffalo 3 32850 5 54750 8 87600

(b) Ox/He Buffalo 3 32850 2 21900 5 54750 1

(c) Pig Rearing 7 76650 8.3 91200 4 43800 19.3 211650

2 Small Ruminants Goat/Sheep rearing

8 87600 8 87600

3 Poultry (Backyard) 2 21900 8 87600 8 87600 18 197100

4 Pisiculture (Fisheries) 1 10950 2 21900 3 32850

5 Bee-Keeping 1 10950 1 10950

TOTAL 13 142350 15.3 167850 14 153300 10 109500 10 109500 62.3 682500

OUTCOMES

Income (In Rs.) Mandays Generated No.of Beneficiaries

Pre - Project Post - Project ST Women Total ST Women Total

21000 40000 3114 934 3114 62 17 62

48

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS FOR NEW LIVELIHOODS

Analysis of the opportunities for New IGAs Sl. No

Scope for new IGA activities

Type of activity Constraints for not

taking up the activity

Potential members to benefit, if constraints are

addressed

Annual Income possible

Proposed interventions Units

required

Unit cost

Total cost

1 Petty Trade 35000 15 10950 164250

2 Handicraft 38000 5 10950 54750

3 Food Processing 25800 10 10950 109500

4 Handloom 35000 10 10950 109500

5 Carpentry 35000 5 10950 54750

6 Shoe repair 30000 2 10950 21900

7 Broom stick making 35000 18 10950 197100

8 Motor Mechanic 40000 2 10950 21900

9 Mobile Phone repair

40000 2 10950 21900

10 Floriculture 45000 11.8 10950 130200

11

Untapped

skills

available,

natural

resources,

services and

market

opportunities

. Agarbati Stick making /Bamboo processing

1. Lack of fund for starting the trade.

2. Lack of skill and training

3. Lack of support from the local people

4. Lack of vision 5. Lack of raw-

material for processing

1. Landless and Asset less

2. BPL families 3. Widows 4. Old-aged pensioner 5. Handicapped persons 6. Any other who are

willing to take up these identified activities needing financial support

35000

1. Special Training and capacity building for identified persons at various training institutes as per the activity selected.

2. Provision of infrastructure whenever required

3. Financial support 4. Provision of Marketing

facility 5. Upgradation of skills for

those skilled workers. 6. Door-step training for

Old-aged and Handicapped persons.

7. Provision of raw material and other necessary tools and equipments.

15 10950 164250

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR NEW LIVELIHOOD (ASSETLESS)

PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs.

1 14 153300 25.8 283500 25 273750 16 175200 15 164250 95.8 1050000

49

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK-UP OF WORKS FOR NEW LIVELIHOODS (Physical and Financial)

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No. Name of the Activity of

the SHG

No.of SHG to be

formed No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs.

1 Petty Trade 1 5 54750 5 54750 5 54750 15 164250

2 Handicraft 5 54750 5 54750

3 Food Processing 1 5 54750 5 54750 10 109500

4 Handloom 1 10 109500 10 109500

5 Carpentry 5 54750 5 54750

6 Shoe-repair 2 21900 2 21900

7 Broom Stick processing

1 18 197100 18 197100

8 Motor Mechanic 2 21900 2 21900

9 Mobile Phone Repair 2 21900 2 21900

10 Floriculture 1 11.8 130200 11.8 130200

11 Agarbati Stick making/ Bamboo processing

1 2 21900 2 21900 1 10950 10 109500 15 164250

TOTAL 6 14 153300 25.8 283500 25 273750 16 175200 15 164250 95.8 1050000

50

KELSIH

PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL DETAILS

Sl.No Name of works % Physical in No.& Ha

Allocation in rupees

1 Preparation of DPR 1 1 105000

2 Entry Point Activities 4 4 420000

3 Institution & Capacity Building 5 11 525000

Existing livelihood

6.5 62.3 682500

4 Productivity Enhancement

Livestock group 6.5 62.3 682500

5 Livelihood for Asset less 10 95.8 1050000

6 Natural Resources Management 50 479.6 5250000

7 Monitoring & Evaluation 2 NA 210000

8 Consolidation Phase 5 NA 525000

9 Administration 10 4 1050000

100 TOTAL 10500000

51

CROP PRODUCTION

Sl no

Farmer type

Variety

Average land

holding (Ac)

Land type

(R/I/H/F/etc)

Major crops sown

Production

(kgs/acre)

Major Gaps identified Possible interventions proposed under Adoptive &

infrastructure of PE

No. of units

required

Cost per unit

Proposed cost

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

High yield 2.5 R Paddy

700 108.6 10950 1187550 1

SF

Less yield 2.5 R Paddy

600 310 10950 3394500

High yield - - - - 2

MF

Less yield 5 R Paddy

600 61 10950 667950

3 BF High yield - - -

1. Sparodic clearing of jhum land and burnt destroyed vegetative barrier resulting lost of top soil and fertility.

2. Burning of jhum land not only affected

the jhum area, but also the wild fire destroyed the young vegetative plants in the adjoining areas.

3. Shifting cultivation resulted in destruction of natural vegetative barriers.

4. Destruction of vegetative barrier speed up the run off speed of rain water which decreases the chance of recharging water table.

5. Lost of top soil resulted less yield. 6. Lack of technical, financial and infra-

development for practicing permanent jhuming for cultivators and farmers.

1. Introduction of Permanent jhuming in the project area for which land development activities like Bench Terracing, Terracing, WRC, Contour Trench and Half moon terrace and other moisture conservation works will be taken up.

2. Tapping all water sources for irrigating the

project area. 3. Harvesting rain water during monsoon for

utilization during dry season.

4. Introduction of quality planting materials of improved variety.

5. Planting of Horticulture cash crops like Orange,Nimbu,Hatkora,Banana, avocado, Pine-apple etc in those areas with slope % of 10-45

6. Leveling of nearly slope areas for WRC 7. Preparation of Canopy area for regeneration of

forest 8. Introduction of climbers like passion fruit and

grapes in those areas above 4000 feet from MSL.

- - -

* Besides Paddy and Banana major crop shown in the area are Citrus fruit, Ginger, Sugar Cane, Papaya, Turmeric and Passion fruit

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR CROP PRODUCTION (WATERSHED MANANGEMENT WORKS)

PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs. Phy. Ha Fin. in Rs.

1 72 7,88,400 135 14,78,250 114.6 12,53,250 86 9,41,700 72 7,88,400 479.6 52,50,000

52

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK-UP OF WORKS FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT WORKS

(Physical and Financial)

Sl.N Name of Activity

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Surface Water Resources

No Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost No. Ha Capa city

Cost

(a) Tanks 8 8 160 87600 8 8 160 87600 2 2 40 21900 2 2 40 21900 2 2 40 21900 22 22 440 240900

(b) Ponds 2 2 40 21900 2 2 40 21900 8 8 160 87600 8 8 160 87600 8 8 160 87600 28 28 560 306600

(c) Channel

1

(d) Gravity pipe line

10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 10 10 200 109500 50 50 1000 547500

20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 20 20 300 219000 100 100 1500 1095000

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL Recharging Ground Water

Resources No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost No Ha Cost 2

Dug out Ponds 5 5 54750 5 5 54750 9.6 9.6 103500 5 5 54750 5 5 54750 29.6 29.6 322500

1

st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL Executing Agency Engineering Structure Treatment

No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost No./rtm Cost

Land Development in Private land.

Contour bunding 2 21900 2 21900 2 21900 6 65700 Land Holder Bench Terracing 8 87600 5 54750 5 54750 5 54750 5 54750 28 306600 Land Holder

A

Earthen Checkdam 2 21900 2 21900 Land Holder

Land Development in Community land

Contour bunding 2 21900 1 10950 2 21900 2 21900 2 21900 9 98550 UG

Bench Terracing 2 21900 1 10950 1 10950 4 43800 UG

3

B

Earthen Checkdam 1 10950 1 10950 UG

53

Vegetative Cover 1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Executing Agency

Ridge Area Treatment in Community land

Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost Ha No.of Plants

Cost

(i) Afforestation 5 1000 54750 10 2000 109500 10 2000 109500 3 600 32850 7 1400 76650 35 7000 383250 WC A

(ii) Regeneration 2 400 21900 10 2000 109500 10 2000 109500 4 800 43800 2 400 21900 28 5600 306600 WC

Land Development in Private Land

(I) Afforestation Land Holder

(ii) Horticulture 22 3960 240900 60 1080 657000 50 9000 547500 40 7200 438000 22 3960 240900 194 34920 2124300 Land Holder

B

(iii) WRC 10 NA 109500 10 NA 109500 Land Holder

Land Development in Community Lands

(i) Afforestation 2 400 21900 10 2000 109500 5 1000 54750 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 21 4200 229950 UG

(ii) Regeneration 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 6 1200 65700 UG

(iii) Pasture 2 400 21900 2 400 21900 4 800 43800 UG

4

C

(iv) Nursery raising 2 30000 21900 2 30000 21900 UG * The Norms of Aided Natural Regeneration (Ministry of Environment & Forest) have been followed under Afforestation and Regeneration i.e. 200 Plants/Ha

54

PROPOSED INTERVENTION FOR EXISTING LIVELIHOODS

Problem typology Sl No

Homogenous group

Type of activity

Average income

per month

Procurement Production

Service Marketing Skills

Proposed interventions Units

required Unit cost

Total cost

1 Micro-

Enterprises Petty trade 1200 Sufficient Minimal Available 3 10950 32850

2 Handicraft 1300 Sufficient Minimal Available 4 10950 43800

3 Food Processing 1100 Sufficient Minimal Available 10 10950 109500

4 Mombati Making 1100 Sufficient Minimal Available 7 10950 76650

5 Handloom 1200 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

6 Broom Stick making

1000 Sufficient Minimal Available 10.3 10950 113100

7 Agarbati Stick making/ Bamboo processing

1000 Sufficient Minimal Available 16 10950 175200

8 Knitting 1000 Sufficient Minimal Available 3 10950 32850

9 Tailoring 1500 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

10 Mechanic 2500 Sufficient Minimal Available 2 10950 21900

11

Artisans

&

Other

livelihoods

Carpentry 2500 Sufficient Minimal Available

Since, most of the targeted groups are without proper training and exposure outside their own village. Their skill i.e. Presentation for marketing their produces in the open market is difficult. Besides, the quality of their produces are always inferior to those available in the market, Quality of work should be upgraded in order to compete with others. Therefore, up gradation of skills of rural micro entrepreneur and artisans need to be focused.

Training for upgradation of skill will be provided for rural artisans by collaborating with KVK Lengpui, RSETI Zemabawk and other renown training institutes, for capacity building SIRD Kolasib and ETC Thingsulthliah will be engaged. Financial support will be provided from the project fund at the rate of Rs.10950 per unit or beneficiary. During the consolidation phase, those units which are identified to be weak should be provided the second dose of financial assistance.

3 10950 32850

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR EXISTING LIVELIHOOD

(MICRO ENTERPRISE) PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs.

1 10 109500 15.3 167850 14 153300 13 142350 10 109500 62.3 682500

55

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK-UP OF WORKS FOR EXISTING LIVELIHOODS

(Physical and Financial)

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No. Name of the Activity of

the SHG

No.of SHG to be

formed No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs.

1 Petty Trade 3 32850 3 32850

2 Handicraft 4 43800 4 43800

3 Food Processing 1 5 54750 5 54750 10 109500

4 Mombati making/ Vermicompost

1 7 76650 7 76650

5 Handloom 2 21900 2 21900

6 Broom Stick Cultivation/ Medicinal Plantation

1 10.3 113100 10.3 113100

7 Agarbati Stick making/ Bamboo processing

2 6 65700 10 109500 16 175200

8 Knitting 3 32850 3 32850

9 Motor Mechanic 2 21900 2 21900

10 Tailoring 2 2 21900

11 Carpentry 3 32850 3 32850

TOTAL 5 10 109500 15.3 167850 14 13 142350 10 109500 62.3 682500

56

LIVESTOCK GROUP

Problem typology (Describe) S. No

Type of Animal

No. of animals

with rearers

Animal Reproducti

on

Animal Health

Animal manageme

nt (feed etc)

Marketing /

trading

Skills in management

Any other (specify)

Proposed interventions Units

required Unit cost

Proposed cost

1 Milch Animals 4

1/ 1.5 years

Good Available Minimal 5 10950 54750

2 Draught animals

4

1/ 1.5 years

Good Available Minimal 8 10950 87600

3 Small ruminants

17 1/ years Good Available Minimal 8 10950 87600

4 Pig rearing 62 8/ years Good Available Minimal 18 10950 197100

5 Poultry 78 24/ Hen Good Available Minimal 19.3 10950 211650

6 Pisciculture 1 NA Good Available Minimal 2 10950 21900

7 Bee keeping 1 NA Good Available Minimal

The local rearers are without technical knowledge and skill; however, by sharing their experience, they can do their respective activity smoothly.

Since, the livestock farming is done in small scales; it can only meet the local demand and consumption. Hence, the incomes of rearers are very limited.

1. The local rearers will be encouraged to enhance their activity; the no. of animals will be doubled or tripled.

2. Infrastructure like Pig-sty, Poultry shed etc will be provided from the project fund.

3. Training will be conducted at various identified Institution to enhance their capacity.

4. Technical assistance will be made available in their door-steps.

5. The dropping of such animals will be processed for manures.

6. Marketing facilities will be provided.

2 10950 21900

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR LIVESTOCK GROUP (PRODUCTION SYSTEM) PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs.

1 10 109500 15.3 167850 14 153300 13 142350 10 109500 62.3 682500

57

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK UP OF WORKS FOR LIVESTOCK GROUP (ALLIED AND OTHER ACTIVITIES)

Physical and Financial

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year Total

Sl.No Name of Activity No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs.

Other Livestock.

(a) Cow/She Buffalo 3 32850 2 21900 5 54750

(b) Ox/He Buffalo 4 43800 4 43800 8 87600 1

(c) Pig Rearing 3 32850 9 98550 6 65700 18 197100

2 Small Ruminants Goat/Sheep rearing

4 43800 4 43800 8 87600

3 Poultry (Backyard) 9.3 102150 10 109500 19.3 211650

4 Pisiculture (Fisheries) 2 21900 2 21900

5 Bee-Keeping 1 10950 1 10950 2 21900

TOTAL 10 109500 15.3 167850 14 153300 13 142350 10 109500 62.3 685000

OUTCOMES

Income (In Rs.) Mandays Generated No.of Beneficiaries

Pre - Project Post - Project ST Women Total ST Women Total

21000 40000 3114 934 3114 62 17 62

58

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS FOR NEW LIVELIHOODS

Analysis of the opportunities for New IGAs

Sl. No

Scope for new IGA activities

Type of activity Constraints for not

taking up the activity

Potential members to benefit, if constraints

are addressed

Annual Income possibl

e

Proposed interventions Units

required Unit cost

Total cost

1 Petty Trade 35000 10 10950 109500

2 Handicraft 38000 10 10950 109500

3 Food Processing 25800 15 10950 164250

4 Handloom 35000 5 10950 54750

5 Carpentry 35000 2 10950 21900

6 Shoe repair 30000 2 10950 21900

7 Broom stick making 35000 21.8 10950 239700

8 Mechanic 40000 2 10950 21900

9 Mobile Phone repair 40000 2 10950 21900

10 Floriculture 45000 10 10950 109500

11

Untapped skills

available, natural

resources, services

and market opportuniti

es. Agarbati Stick

making/ Bamboo

processing

1. Lack of fund for starting the trade.

2. Lack of skill and training

3. Lack of support from the local people

4. Lack of vision 5. Lack of raw-

material for processing

1. Landless and Asset less

2. BPL families 3. Windows 4. Old-aged pensioner 5. Handicapped person 6. Any other who are

willing to take up these identified activities needing financial support

35000

1. Special Training and capacity building for identified persons at various training institutes as per the activity selected.

2. Provision of infrastructure whenever required

3. Financial support 4. Provision of Marketing facility 5. Upgradation of skills for those

skilled workers. 6. Door-step training for Old-aged

and Handicapped persons. 7. Provision of raw material and

other necessary tools and equipments.

16 10950 175200

YEAR – WISE INTERVENTION PLAN FOR NEW LIVELIHOOD

(ASSETLESS) PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL

1

st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs. Phy. No. Fin. in Rs.

1 15 164250 25 273750 25.8 283500 16 175200 14 153300 95.8 1050000

59

YEAR WISE AND COMPONENT WISE BREAK-UP OF WORKS

FOR NEW LIVELIHOODS (Physical and Financial)

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year 4

th Year 5

th Year TOTAL

Sl.No. Name of the Activity of

the SHG

No.of SHG to be

formed No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs. No. Rs.

1 Petty Trade 1 5 54750 5 54750 10 109500

2 Handicraft 1 5 54750 5 54750 10 109500

3 Food Processing 2 10 109500 5 54750 15 164250

4 Handloom 5 54750 5 54750

5 Carpentry 2 21900 2 21900

6 Shoe-repair 2 21900 2 21900

7 Broom Stick processing

2 11.8 130200 10 109500 21.8 239700

8 Motor Mechanic 2 21900 2 21900

9 Mobile Phone Repair 2 21900 2 21900

10 Floriculture 1 10 109500 10 109500

11 Agarbati Stick making/ Bamboo processing

2 10 109500 6 65700 16 175200

TOTAL 9 15 164250 25 273750 25.8 283500 16 175200 14 153300 95.8 1050000

60

DPR PLAN ABSTRACT (Rs. In Lakhs)

1 year 2nd

year 3rd

year 4th year 5

th year 6

th year 7

th year Total

S. No Component Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs.)

1 Entry Point Activities (4%) 10 8.4

10 8.4

2 Institution & Capacity Building (5%) 6 2.1 6 2.1 6 2.1 6 2.1 6 2.1

30 10.5

3 Productivity Enhancement (13%) 43 4.7085 61.2 8.904 56 6.132 49 5.3655 20 2.19

249.2 27.30

4 Livelihoods for Asset less (10%) 19 2.0805 50.8 6.12 50.8 6.12 32 3.504 29 3.1755

191.6 21.0

5 Natural Resource Management (50%) 144 15.768 270 29.565 229.2 25.065 172 18.834 144 15.768

959.2 105.0

6 Consolidation phase (5%) 48 5.25 48 5.25 96 10.5

7 Administration 10% 4 3.0 4 3.0 4 3.0 4 3.0 4 3.0 4 3.0 4 3.0 4 21.0

FINANCIAL TOTAL : 203.7

* Monitoring 1% + Evaluation 1% + DPR Preparation 1% = Total : 3% : 6.3 GRANT TOTAL : 210.0

61

CONSOLIDATION & WITHDRAWAL PHASE AIZAWL DISTRICT: MIZORAM

NAME OF THE PROJECT : AIBAWK – I : COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES

TARGET ACHIEVEMENT

Mandas Name of Village

Activity Proposed

Target Area under the activities Ha

Estimate Expenditure

Expected no of Beneficiaries

Estimated WDF

Contribu-tion

Area Treated under

the activity

Expenditure incurred

Actual no of

Benefic-iaries

TOTAL WOMEN

WDF Collected

Falkawn Kelsih

MIS-TABLE-M(PA) C1

After completion of the Project, all the common properties within the project area under Watershed Management

Works i.e. Gravity pipeline, Open – Irrigation Channel, Water Harvesting Structures should be entered in this table during

consolidation phase. Contribution toward Watershed Development Fund which is 5% of the expenditure incurred in that

particular area should be collected from the beneficiaries.

This fund will be utilized for maintenance, repair, renovation of the Assets (CPR) created under the project fund after exit protocol. This MIS-table is an Assets Register of the project; therefore, entry should be correct in all respects.

62

INSTITUTION AND CAPACITY BUILDING PLAN NAME OF THE PROJECT: AIBAWK – I

Name of Institution & Activities identified

Year Sl.N Target Group Targeted

Beneficiaries SIRD Kolasib ETC Thingsulthliah DWCDC Aizawl &

SLNA Mizoram KVK Lengpui & Farmer Training Centre Selesih

R-SETI Zemabawk & ITI Aizawl. Weaving Centre

Luangmual.

1 PIA & WDT 4 Concept of IWMP

2 Watershed Committee 50 Concept of IWMP

3 SHG & UG 120 Concept of IWMP

4 Beneficiaries 958 Concept of IWMP

Mobilization of Resources

Management & Convergence

I

5 PIA, WDT & WC 174 Concept of IWMP

1 Rural Artisans 20 Formation of SHG Skill upgradation &

Management of products

2 Livestock Farmers 20 Formation of SHG Skill upgradation and

Animal Husbandry

3 Gardening & Crop Production

207 Formation of SHG Multiple Cropping &

Crop Husbandry

4 Micro Entrepreneurs & Petty Trade

30 Formation of SHG

II

5 Watershed Committee 50 Formulation of Action Plan Formation of SHG

Marketing, Skill upgradation & Skill

development

1 Rural Artisans 9 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Skill upgradation &

Management of products

2 Livestock Farmers 14 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Skill upgradation and

Animal Husbandry

3 Gardening & Crop Production

114 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Multiple Cropping &

Crop Husbandry

4 Micro Entrepreneurs 3 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG

III

5 Petty Trade 27 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG

Marketing, Skill upgradation & Skill

development

63

1 Rural Artisans 15 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Skill upgradation &

Management of products

2 Livestock Farmers 13 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Skill upgradation and

Animal Husbandry

3 Gardening & Crop Production

86 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Multiple Cropping &

Crop Husbandry

4 Micro Entrepreneurs 10 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG

Marketing, Skill upgradation & Skill

development

IV

5 Petty Trade 4 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG

1 Rural Artisans 10 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Skill upgradation &

Management of products

2 Livestock Farmers 10 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Skill upgradation and

Animal Husbandry

3 Gardening & Crop Production

72 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Multiple Cropping &

Crop Husbandry

4 Micro Entrepreneurs 10 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG

5 Petty Trade 4 Credit linkage and Resources mobilization Formation of SHG Marketing, Skill

upgradation & Skill development

V

6 PIA & Watershed Committee

55 Consolidation of Project Exit protocol, withdrawal mechanism

* The PIA of the Project and Watershed Committee concerned will sponsored trainees to KVK, FTC, R-SETI and ITI Aizawl as per the rate prescribe by

the institution * PIA & WC are advised to arranged training at their locality for handicapped, old aged, widows etc by engaging trainers.

64

BASIC PROFILE OF THE LOCATION

Location of the watershed

Name of the district Aizawl Name of the Mandal/Block Aibawk-I

Name of the Gram Panchayat (s)

Falkawn, Kelsih Name of the habitations Falkawn, Kelsih

Longitudes 920 42’ 10’’ to 92

0 46’ 24’’E Latitude 23

0 38’ 17” to 23

0 43’ 13”

N

Elevation from MSL:

Highest elevation in the watershed (above MSL)

875 Lowest elevation in the watershed (above MSL)

344 Relief/ Height difference (mt) 531

65

66

67

68

69

INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS AND AGREEMENTS

District Level: At the district level, District Watershed Cell & Data Center

(DWCDC) headed by a Project Manager has been constituted

by the SLNA which will function as per the guidelines issued by

Government of India. The Project Manager will be assisted by 3

to 4 Subject Matter Specialists of different discipline like

agriculture, water management social Mobilization, preparation

of DPR for implementation of watershed management

programme in districts treatable area of more than 25,000 ha on

the basis of district perspective and strategic plan prepared by

DWCDC.

Project Level: At the project level, the PIA is responsible for implementation of

IWMP with the help of WDT members of different disciplines.

The PIA will be selected by the DWCDC and will be approved by

the SNLA on the basis of criteria laid down in the guidelines.

Micro Watershed

Level: At the Micro Watershed level, respective Watershed Committees

are to be constituted by Gram Sabhas/traditional village

councils. The Watershed Committees are directly responsible for

implementation of various schemes as per DPR the Micro

Watershed with technical guidance of WDT members. The

Watershed Committee will take the help of SHGs of the

respective Micro-Watershed while implementing the earmarked

schemes.

70